2012-Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose Martin E. Rosen - Colorado

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2012-Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose Martin E. Rosen - Colorado"

Transcription

1 2012-Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose Martin E. Rosen - Colorado I. Summary of Law Colorado applies the accidental result test to determine if a death or an injury is an accident under an accidental death or dismemberment policy. Thus, under Colorado law, a voluntary act can be an accident where the consequence of the act is unforeseen or unexpected. But where a policy does not define the term accident, Colorado Courts will construe the term based on the reasonable expectations of the insured. Where an insurer could have easily defined the circumstances at issue to be excluded from the policy, but chose not to, Colorado courts have construed policies to provide coverage. Additionally, in determining whether an accident caused a death or injury, Colorado law focuses on whether the death or injury is the proximate result of the accident. For example, where intoxication or a pre-existing condition causes an accident which in turn causes the insured s death (e.g., car crash or fall) the death is the result of an accident because the accident is the proximate cause of the death (unless the policy specifically excludes coverage for accidents resulting from intoxication or preexisting conditions). II. Relevant Statutes and Regulations C.R.S , a workers compensation statute, defines accident as follows: Accident means an unforeseen event occurring without the will or design of the person whose mere act causes it; an unexpected, unusual, or undesigned occurrence; or the effect of an unknown cause or, the cause, being known, an unprecedented consequence of it. 3 CCR restricts the definition of accident that can be used in a Medicare supplement policy or certificate: No policy or certificate may be advertised, solicited or issued for delivery in this state as a Medicare supplement policy or certificate unless such policy or certificate contains definitions or terms that conform to the requirements of this section. A. Accident, accidental injury, or accidental means shall be defined to employ result language and shall not include words which establish an accidental means test or use words such as external, violent, visible wounds or similar words of description or characterization. 1. The definition shall not be more restrictive than the following: Injury or injuries for which benefits are provided means accidental bodily injury sustained by the insured person which is the direct result of an

2 accident, independent of disease or bodily infirmity or any other cause, and occurs while insurance coverage is in force. C.R.S , provides that the preclusion from enforcing a general suicide exclusion clause after a specified time period does not preclude an insurer from asserting that a suicide is not accidental under an accidental death or injury policy: The suicide of a policyholder after the first policy year of any life insurance policy issued by any life insurance company doing business in this state shall not be a defense against the payment of a life insurance policy, whether said suicide was voluntary or involuntary, and whether said policyholder was sane or insane. Nothing in this section is intended or shall be construed to apply to any accident insurance policy insuring against accidental death or death by accidental means or to those parts or provisions of any life insurance policy insuring specifically against accidental death or death by accidental means. III. Case Law a. What is an Accident? In the context of accidental death and injury policies, Colorado rejects the accidental means test in favor of an accidental results analysis. See Carroll v. CUNA Mutual Insurance Society, 894 P. 2d 746, 753 (Colo. 1995). Thus, under Colorado law, a voluntary act that causes an unforeseeable, unintended, or unexpected result can be considered an accident. Id. (although coverage was denied based on other policy limitations, the decedent s brain aneurysm, which was triggered by sexual intercourse, was deemed an accident under the policy because it was an unexpected result of the sexual intercourse); see also Bobier v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Company, 570 P.2d 1094, 1096 (Colo. App. 1977) ( [D]eath by accident in Colorado is not restricted to cases in which the injury is initially incurred through accidental means. Rather, it applies as well to those situations in which an unusual or unanticipated result flows from a common cause) (Emphasis in original). Where accident is undefined in an insurance policy, Courts will construe the term based on the reasonable expectations of the insured. LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, 605 F.3d 789, 806 (10th Cir. 2010); Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Cutrone, 448 F. Supp. 2d 1226, 1230 (D.C. Colo. 2006) (construing accident in an uninsured motorist policy from the standpoint of the insured where the term was not defined in the policy). b. Drunk Driving May Be Considered Accidental Under ERISA LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, 605 F.3d 789 (10th Cir. 2010). Decedent was driving his truck 20 mph over the speed limit while intoxicated. The vehicle veered off the road and rolled over four and one-quarter times. Decedent and his passenger were both ejected from the truck and pronounced dead at the scene. It was determined

3 that Decedent s BAC was.227, almost three times the legal limit of.08 in Colorado. Decedent s death certificate indicated that the cause of his death was head and internal injuries due to blunt force trauma. Id. at Decedent was a participant in his employer s group coverage for accidental death and dismemberment and life insurance. His parents were the beneficiaries under the plan. They submitted claims to the insurer for life insurance benefits and accidental death and dismemberment benefits. The insurer paid the life insurance benefits but denied the claim for accidental death and dismemberment benefits on the grounds that: 1) due to Decedent s intoxication, the accident was not the sole cause of his death; 2) because the crash was a reasonably foreseeable result of driving while intoxicated, it was not an accident; and 3) benefits were not payable under the plan because Decedent injured himself on purpose by driving while intoxicated. Id. at 795. The district court, reviewing the insurer s claim determination de novo, held that Decedent s crash was an accident under the plan. The Tenth Circuit affirmed, relying on its earlier decision in Kellogg v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 549 F.3d 818 (10th Cir. 2008). The Court first considered whether the crash was the sole cause of Decedent s death. In Kellogg, the Tenth Circuit held that a Decedent s car accident was the sole cause of his death even though the accident was caused by a seizure. Refusing to apply an exclusion for losses caused by physical illness, the Kellogg Court noted that the plan did not exclude losses due to accidents caused by physical illnesses. Thus, because Kellogg died from the car accident rather than directly from the seizure his loss was not excluded under the Plan. Similarly, because the decedent in LaAsmar died from the car crash, and not from alcohol intoxication, the Tenth Circuit reasoned that the sole cause of his death under the plan language was the crash. Id. at 802. The Court next considered whether the crash was an accident under the plan s terms. In doing so, the Court expressly refused to adopt a blanket rule that all vehicle crashes involving intoxicated drivers were either accidents or not accidents. Id. Rather, the Court reasoned that because the term accident was ambiguous in the plan, it had to construe the term based on what a reasonable person in Decedent s position would have expected the term to mean. Id. at 803. The Court also noted that [i]t is not too much to ask of ERISA insurers to set forth explicitly what is and is not an accident covered by their AD&D policy, and to state unambiguously whether death and disability caused by the insured s drunk driving is accident. Id. The Court further observed that an insured s own actions often contribute to their injuries, but they are still nonetheless considered accidents (e.g., speeding, talking on a cell phone, driving while sleepy, turning around to talk to a child, etc.). The Court then concluded that an insured would reasonably expect that the term accident included an unintended death resulting from a vehicle crash where the driver had a blood alcohol content of 2.8 times the legal limit. Id. at 808.

4 Finally, the Court concluded that Decedent s death did not fall under the Plan s exclusion for purposefully inflicted injuries because there was nothing in the record suggesting that Decedent intended to injure himself on purpose on the night of the vehicle crash. Id. at 814.; see also Meek V. Zurich North America Insurance Company, 704 F. Supp. 2d 1069, 1076 (D.C. Colo. 2010) (where plan did not define accident, the plan s exclusion for self-inflicted injuries did not apply on de novo review where the decedent died in motorcycle accident while intoxicated). c. Pre-Existing Illness May Not Bar Recovery Under ERISA Pavicich v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (D.C. Colo. September 27, 2010). Decedent was a participant in his employer s life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance plan. Id. at *2. He was on bipolar medication and had been hospitalized multiple times due to suicide attempts. Id. at *3-4. He suffered a seizure, likely due to his medication, which caused him to fall, hit his head and injure his spine. Id. at *5. The fall rendered him a quadriplegic, and he underwent C-spine fusion surgery. A week later he died from cardiac arrest and renal failure while still hospitalized. Id. Decedent s death certificate indicated that he died from Complications of cervical spine injury sustained during seizure activity. Id. at *7. Decedent s wife submitted a claim for life insurance benefits and accidental death and dismemberment benefits. Aetna paid the life insurance claim but denied the accidental death and dismemberment claim on the grounds that the loss was excluded because Decedent s death was caused by or contributed to by a bodily infirmity, disease and medical treatment. Id. at *9-10. Reviewing Aetna s decision under the abuse of discretion standard of review, the district court nonetheless held that the loss was covered. Id. at * The district court relied on the Tenth Circuit decision in Kellog, supra, stating that the phrase loss caused or contributed by means only where the illness causes the hospitalization and death and not where the illness causes an accident that causes the death. Id. at *25. In other words, coverage is excluded where the illness directly causes the death, but not where the illness indirectly causes death by causing an accident that sets forth a chain of events leading to death. Id. at *26. Quoting Kellogg, the Court noted that courts have long rejected attempts to preclude recovery on the basis that the accident would not have happened but for the insured s illness. Id. The Court then concluded that the loss was covered because Decedent s illness caused the accident, but the accident itself caused his death. As in LaAsmar, the Court noted that if the insurer wanted to exclude coverage under these facts, it could have articulated such an exclusion in the Plan. Id. at *30. Compare Pirkheim v. First Unum Life Insurance Company, 229 F. 3d 1008 (10th Cir. 2000). There, Decedent had a congenital heart defect that was corrected with surgery but required implantation of a pacemaker to control cardiac arrhythmias that

5 resulted from the surgery. Decedent died when his pacemaker stopped working as a result of battery depletion. At the time of his death, he was insured for accidental death under an ERISA-governed group insurance coverage purchased through his father s employer. Id. The plan provided coverage when the death resulted from accidental bodily injury that occurred independently of all other causes. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, holding that the plan language was unambiguous and that Decedent s bodily injury was not independent of all other causes. Id. at The Tenth Circuit affirmed, holding that the accidental bodily injury did not result independently of all other causes because the death was due to Decedent s cardiac arrhythmias that occurred after the pacemaker stopped functioning. Id. at (Or perhaps the result may be rationalized as consistent with the Kellogg court s kind of analysis: The accident caused the pacemaker to stop working, but it was the resultant arrhythmias that caused the death.) d. Intentional Reckless Conduct May Bar Recovery Baldwin v. Stonebridge Life Insurance Co., 283 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D.C. Colo. 2003). Decedent died when she jumped from a vehicle moving 55 mph during a heated argument with her husband. Id. at The insurer denied the claim for accidental death benefits on the grounds that the policy excluded coverage for intentionally selfinflicted injuries. Id. Decedent s husband sued the insurer, and the insurer moved for summary judgment. Id. The district court denied the motion, holding that there was a disputed issue of fact as to whether Decedent intended to exit the vehicle while it was moving. Id. at General American Life Insurance Company v. Priest, 301 F. 3d 390 (10th Cir. 1962) (interpreting Missouri law). Decedent s death was determined to be accidental when he was shot by his wife after he pointed a gun at her. Id. at 392. The general rule is that when [an] insured assaults another and is killed as a consequence of his attack, his death is accidental unless it was a natural and probable result of his own actions, reasonably foreseeable by him or a reasonably prudent man in his position. Id. at 394. e. Suicide Withey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (March 7, 1994). Decedent died from a self-inflicted gun shot wound following a heated argument with his wife. Id. at *3. Plaintiff made a claim for group accidental death benefits. She alleged that the death was accidental because the gun was always kept unloaded and Decedent would have been operating under the belief that the gun was unloaded. Id. at *3-4. The police department and coroner determined that the death was a suicide. Id. * Applying the abuse of discretion standard of review, the Court held that it was reasonable for the claim administrator to rely on the police report and coroner report, especially because the only contradictory evidence came from the plaintiff s self-serving declarations. Id.

6 f. Exclusions Krane v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, 698 F. Supp. 220 (D.C. Colo. 1988). Decedent died during surgical exploration of a parathyroid gland. His official cause of death was cardiac arrest while under general anesthesia. Decedent was insured under an accidental death and dismemberment policy, and his beneficiaries sued the insurer after their claim was denied. Id. at 221. His policy excluded coverage for death or injury resulting from medical or surgical treatment, unless the operation was made necessary by an injury otherwise covered under the policy. Id. at The insurer moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the summary judgment, holding that the plain language of the policy excluded coverage, even if the physicians acted negligently. Id. at 222.

2012 - Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose William J. Gallwey, III Oregon OREGON

2012 - Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose William J. Gallwey, III Oregon OREGON 2012 - Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose William J. Gallwey, III Oregon OREGON I. SUMMARY OF LAW Under Oregon law, where an insurance policy provides benefits for death caused

More information

2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose. Richard S. Maselli, Esq. Delaware

2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose. Richard S. Maselli, Esq. Delaware 2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose Richard S. Maselli, Esq. Delaware I. Summary of Law Delaware case law focuses on the proximate cause of the death in determining whether

More information

(2) Any group or blanket policy, except as provided in ss. 627.648-627.6499.

(2) Any group or blanket policy, except as provided in ss. 627.648-627.6499. 2012 ACCIDENTAL DEATH CLAIMS: ILLNESS, MEDICAL MISHAP, AND OVERDOSE LEONOR M. LAGOMASINO Florida I. SUMMARY OF LAW The absence of a definition for key operative terms such as illness, sickness, or accident

More information

FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE

FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE FLOYD-TUNNELL V. SHELTER MUT. INS. CO.: WRONGFUL DEATH CLAIMS AND UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE INTRODUCTION Rebecca Floyd-Tunnell and Doris Floyd ( Appellants ) filed suit against Shelter Mutual Insurance

More information

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NEW YORK, NEW YORK

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NEW YORK, NEW YORK METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICYHOLDER: Group Policy Form No: GPNP12-AX (Referred to as the Group Policy ) Certificate Form No: GCERT12-AX (Referred to as the Certificate )

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc MORRIS JONES and ) PAMELA BROWN, ) ) Appellants/Cross-Respondents, ) ) vs. ) No. SC89844 ) MID-CENTURY INSURANCE CO., ) ) Respondent/Cross-Appellant. ) Appeal from the

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14-3282

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14-3282 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-3282 NOT PRECEDENTIAL JOHN GUTHRIE, as Beneficiary of an Accidental Death Insurance Policy Issued in the Name of Corey Guthrie, deceased, Appellant

More information

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013)

Recent Case Update. Insurance Stacking UIM Westra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 13 AP 48, June 18, 2013) Recent Case Update VOL. XXII, NO. 2 Summer 2013 Insurance Summary Judgment Stacking UIM Saladin v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Court of Appeals, 12 AP 1649, June 4, 2013) On August 26, 2010,

More information

Employee Benefits Law

Employee Benefits Law Employee Benefits Law Drunk Driving Fatality Determined Not Accidental Under ERISA-Governed Insurance Plan Stamp v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 531 F.3d 84 (1st Cir. 2008) Federal common law governs

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION THREE GERALD J. BAMBERGER, et al., ) No. ED92319 ) Appellants, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. ) of St. Louis County ) 08SL-CC01435 CHARLES

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO FRANCIS GRAHAM, ) No. ED97421 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) ) Honorable Steven H. Goldman STATE

More information

2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose David Koth, Jeanette Bartley Tennessee

2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose David Koth, Jeanette Bartley Tennessee 2012 Accidental Death Claims: Illness, Medical Mishap and Overdose David Koth, Jeanette Bartley Tennessee I. SUMMARY OF THE LAW Tennessee courts use a proximate cause test to determine whether a preexisting

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-60049 Document: 00512660335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT LINDSEY GREEN; BRENDA GREEN, v. Plaintiffs-Appellants, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

Indiana Supreme Court

Indiana Supreme Court ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS George M. Plews Sean M. Hirschten Plews Shadley Racher & Braun LLP Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR AMICUS CURIAE THE INSURANCE INSTITUTE OF INDIANA, INC. John C. Trimble Richard

More information

https://advance.lexis.com/pages/contentviewprintablepage.aspx

https://advance.lexis.com/pages/contentviewprintablepage.aspx Page 1 of 5 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24928 Manfredi v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24928 (Copy citation) United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit December 17, 2013,

More information

2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 05/03/12. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2012 IL App (5th) 100579-U NO. 5-10-0579

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-20512 Document: 00512673150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2014 Lyle W.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al. : Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #82] After

More information

MAPPING THE UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED WILDERNESS: Liability Coverage for Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists. Neil Schonert

MAPPING THE UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED WILDERNESS: Liability Coverage for Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists. Neil Schonert MAPPING THE UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED WILDERNESS: Liability Coverage for Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists I. Introduction Neil Schonert II. III. IV. Determining Initial UM/UIM Limits Calculating UIM

More information

UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE - HISTORY

UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE - HISTORY 59202 Prepared by the North Dakota Legislative Council staff for the Transportation Committee March 2004 UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE - HISTORY This memorandum reviews the law on uninsured

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0308n.06 Filed: April 21, 2005. No. 04-5393

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0308n.06 Filed: April 21, 2005. No. 04-5393 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0308n.06 Filed: April 21, 2005 No. 04-5393 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EDWIN HOLLENBECK and BRENDA HOLLENBECK, UNPUBLISHED June 30, 2011 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 297900 Ingham Circuit Court FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE LC No. 09-000166-CK

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION 2002 WI App 237 Case No.: 02-0261 Complete Title of Case: KENNETH A. FOLKMAN, SR., DEBRA J. FOLKMAN AND KENNETH A. FOLKMAN, JR., Petition for Review filed.

More information

2015 IL App (1st) 150714-U. No. 1-15-0714 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

2015 IL App (1st) 150714-U. No. 1-15-0714 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2015 IL App (1st) 150714-U SIXTH DIVISION September 30, 2015 No. 1-15-0714 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited

More information

American National General Insurance Company, Colorado Certificate of Authority No. 1885,

American National General Insurance Company, Colorado Certificate of Authority No. 1885, COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No.: 06CA0381 Colorado Division of Insurance OAC Case No. IN 2004-006 American National General Insurance Company, Colorado Certificate of Authority No. 1885,

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

since recovered the policy limits of both the automobile driver s insurance, and the underinsured motorist benefits covering

since recovered the policy limits of both the automobile driver s insurance, and the underinsured motorist benefits covering IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION OF AMERICA, AN ILLINOIS : STOCK CORPORATION : Plaintiff, : : v. : : KEVIN BEAUCHAMP

More information

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 0309. September Term, 2001 GAIL ANN COSTELLO, ET AL. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 0309. September Term, 2001 GAIL ANN COSTELLO, ET AL. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0309 September Term, 2001 GAIL ANN COSTELLO, ET AL. v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Eyler, James R. Adkins, Wenner, William W., (Retired,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DAVID L. TAYLOR THOMAS R. HALEY III Jennings Taylor Wheeler & Haley P.C. Carmel, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: DOUGLAS D. SMALL Foley & Small South Bend, Indiana

More information

A SUMMARY OF COLORADO UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW April 2004

A SUMMARY OF COLORADO UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW April 2004 A SUMMARY OF COLORADO UNINSURED AND UNDERINSURED INSURANCE COVERAGE LAW April 2004 By: Mark Kane and HayDen Kane By reviewing this document the reader acknowledges that he or she has reviewed, understands

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: OCTOBER 12, 2012; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-001454-MR TAMRA HOSKINS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM LINCOLN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JEFFREY T.

More information

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-1343 AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation,

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-1343 AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 6, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court CITY CENTER WEST, LP, a Colorado limited partnership,

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Huizenga v. Auto-Owners Insurance, 2014 IL App (3d) 120937 Appellate Court Caption DAVID HUIZENGA and BRENDA HUIZENGA, Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE,

More information

uninsured/underinsured motorist ( UM or UIM respectively) coverage of $100,000 per claimant. Under the Atkinson policy,

uninsured/underinsured motorist ( UM or UIM respectively) coverage of $100,000 per claimant. Under the Atkinson policy, PRESENT: All the Justices LENNA JO DYER OPINION BY v. Record No. 031532 JUSTICE G. STEVEN AGEE APRIL 23, 2004 DAIRYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY Herbert C. Gill,

More information

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BRYAN F. LaCHAPELL, Individually and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF KARIN MARIE LaCHAPELL, UNPUBLISHED May 24, 2016 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 326003 Marquette

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross-motions for Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross-motions for Summary CASE 0:12-cv-02855-PAM-FLN Document 117 Filed 01/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Case No. 12-cv-2855 (PAM/FLN) Plaintiff,

More information

No. 99-C-2573 LEE CARRIER AND HIS WIFE MARY BETH CARRIER. Versus RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 99-C-2573 LEE CARRIER AND HIS WIFE MARY BETH CARRIER. Versus RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY Ed. Note: Opinion Rendered April 11, 2000 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 99-C-2573 LEE CARRIER AND HIS WIFE MARY BETH CARRIER Versus RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-13338 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-13338 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. Case: 13-13338 Date Filed: 01/13/2014 Page: 1 of 6 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-13338 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-03858-WBH MERITPLAN

More information

Automobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen Car

Automobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen Car The Ohio State University Knowledge Bank kb.osu.edu Ohio State Law Journal (Moritz College of Law) Ohio State Law Journal: Volume 22, Issue 3 (1961) 1961 Automobile Liability Policy Held to Cover Stolen

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 15-1100. FRANCIS J. GUGLIELMELLI Appellant STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 15-1100. FRANCIS J. GUGLIELMELLI Appellant STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 15-1100 FRANCIS J. GUGLIELMELLI Appellant v. NOT PRECEDENTIAL STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROL DEMIZIO AND ANTHONY : CIVIL ACTION DEMIZIO in their own right and as : ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE : NO. 05-409 OF MATTHEW

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY. Honorable William E. Hickle REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY. Honorable William E. Hickle REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART SHELTER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. No. SD33552 JEANIE VASSEUR, Filed: May 19, 2015 MATTHEW VASSEUR, by and thru his Guardian ad Litem, ADAM VASSEUR, CHARLOTTE VASSEUR, JACKIE STRYDOM,

More information

Accidental Death Policies

Accidental Death Policies Accidental Death Policies Do They Cover Death Due to Alcohol or Drug Use? By Eric Hulett Accidents are one of the five leading causes of deaths in the United States, surpassed only by heart disease, cancer,

More information

LECOMTE, EMANUELSON and DOYLE

LECOMTE, EMANUELSON and DOYLE 155 SOUTH MAIN STREET PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 02903 (401) 454-3111 PLEASE RESPOND TO QUINCY OFFICE LECOMTE, EMANUELSON and DOYLE ATTORNEYS AT LAW BATTERYMARCH PARK II ONE PINE HILL DRIVE, SUITE 101 QUINCY,

More information

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS REL: 12/09/2005 STATE FARM v. BROWN Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ. Case: 13-15213 Date Filed: 06/17/2014 Page: 1 of 10 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-15213 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-00238-GRJ

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, UNPUBLISHED August 20, 2015 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellee, v No. 320710 Oakland Circuit Court YVONNE J. HARE,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -BGS Francis v. Anacomp, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT FRANCIS, CASE NO.cv BEN (BGS) Plaintiff, ORDER: vs. ANACOMP, INC. ACCIDENTAL DEATH AND DISMEMBERMENT

More information

O R D E R. This insurance coverage dispute came before the Supreme Court on February 2,

O R D E R. This insurance coverage dispute came before the Supreme Court on February 2, Supreme Court No. 2004-125-Appeal. Toby Gregelevich et al. : v. : Progressive Northwestern Insurance Company. : O R D E R This insurance coverage dispute came before the Supreme Court on February 2, 2005,

More information

Cancer Insurance. Provides Lump Sum Benefits For First Diagnosis of Cancer. Loyal American Supplemental Series SM

Cancer Insurance. Provides Lump Sum Benefits For First Diagnosis of Cancer. Loyal American Supplemental Series SM Loyal American Supplemental Series SM Cancer Insurance Provides Lump Sum Benefits For First Diagnosis of Cancer Including Our Cancer Recurrence Benefit And Options for Added Flexibility LOYAL-7-0001-BRO-GN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CHARLES MCDEVITT v. Civil No. JFM-08-3431 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OPINION Charles McDevitt has brought this action against

More information

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK John C. Morrison, Jr., Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether an exclusion in an

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK John C. Morrison, Jr., Judge. In this appeal, we consider whether an exclusion in an PRESENT: All the Justices VIRGINIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Record No. 081900 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 4, 2009 VIRGINIA C. WILLIAMS, AN INFANT WHO SUES BY HER FATHER

More information

Supreme Court of Missouri en banc

Supreme Court of Missouri en banc Supreme Court of Missouri en banc MARK KARSCIG, Appellant, v. No. SC90080 JENNIFER M. MCCONVILLE, Appellant, and AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PETTIS

More information

Michael Hoetzel, ALHC Life Claims Manager Farmers New World Life Insurance Company Robert R. Pohls Pohls & Associates Los Angeles, California

Michael Hoetzel, ALHC Life Claims Manager Farmers New World Life Insurance Company Robert R. Pohls Pohls & Associates Los Angeles, California Michael Hoetzel, ALHC Life Claims Manager Farmers New World Life Insurance Company Robert R. Pohls Pohls & Associates Los Angeles, California Craig Williamson, CFE, ALHC Special Unit Manager Farmers New

More information

NO. 5-07-0468 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT

NO. 5-07-0468 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT NOTICE Decision filed 07/13/10. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the NO. 5-07-0468 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS disposition

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Safeway Insurance Co. v. Hadary, 2014 IL App (1st) 132554 Appellate Court Caption SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. JEFFREY

More information

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA No. 95-CC-1456 JULIA MCCARTHY, WIFE OF JAMES MCCARTHY Versus WILLIAM BERMAN, D.C., NATIONAL CHIROPRACTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIT OF CERTIORARI

More information

Illinois Official Reports

Illinois Official Reports Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Acuity v. Decker, 2015 IL App (2d) 150192 Appellate Court Caption ACUITY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DONALD DECKER, Defendant- Appellee (Groot Industries, Inc., Defendant).

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 06-3601 J.E. Jones Construction Co.; The Jones Company Custom Homes, Inc., Now known as REJ Custom Homes, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Appeal from

More information

Insurance: Applicability of the Missouri Suicide Statute to Accident Policies and Double Indemnity Provisions of Life Insurance Policies

Insurance: Applicability of the Missouri Suicide Statute to Accident Policies and Double Indemnity Provisions of Life Insurance Policies Washington University Law Review Volume 1959 Issue 2 January 1959 Insurance: Applicability of the Missouri Suicide Statute to Accident Policies and Double Indemnity Provisions of Life Insurance Policies

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. JOYNER, J. July, 2000

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. JOYNER, J. July, 2000 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. : CIVIL ACTION : vs. : : NO. 99-CV-4871 THOMAS A. RIDDER, JR. : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOYNER,

More information

AG Accident Choice Plus

AG Accident Choice Plus ABOUT 41 MILLION ARE TREATED IN HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOMS FOR TRAUMA EACH YEAR. 1 Think you re covered? Major medical could leave you with more expenses than you can afford. AG Accident Choice Plus Accidental

More information

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice NORTHBROOK PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY OPINION BY JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, v. Record No. 951919 September

More information

TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant.

TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant. Circuit Court of Illinois. County Department Chancery Division Cook County TERRENCE and Marie Domin, Plaintiffs, v. SHELBY INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant. No. 00CH08224. 2008. Answer

More information

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Hassell, Keenan and Koontz, JJ.

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Hassell, Keenan and Koontz, JJ. Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, * Hassell, Keenan and Koontz, JJ. Lacy, MICHAEL F. HAISLIP OPINION BY JUSTICE LEROY R. HASSELL, SR. v. Record No. 962214 September 12, 1997 SOUTHERN HERITAGE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Docket No. 107472. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. KEY CARTAGE, INC., et al. Appellees. Opinion filed October 29, 2009. JUSTICE BURKE delivered

More information

Reed Armstrong Quarterly

Reed Armstrong Quarterly Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors

More information

S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter

S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter 295 Ga. 487 FINAL COPY S13G1048. CARTER v. PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE. HINES, Presiding Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Carter v. Progressive Mountain Ins.,

More information

Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9

Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Case 1:13-cv-00796-RPM Document 23 Filed 02/18/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 13-cv-00796-RPM MICHAEL DAY KEENEY, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior

More information

Homeowner's insurance usually covers the following when they are due to accident or specific

Homeowner's insurance usually covers the following when they are due to accident or specific Insurance TYPES OF POLICIES There are as many types of insurance policies as there are risks. During a disaster people may draw upon health, property and casualty and life insurance. These types of policies

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS NAZHAT BAHRI, and Plaintiff, DR. LABEED NOURI and DR. NAZIH ISKANDER, UNPUBLISHED October 9, 2014 APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION December 9, 2014 9:15 a.m. Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants,

More information

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0331n.06. No. 12-1887 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0331n.06. No. 12-1887 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0331n.06 No. 12-1887 ARTHUR HILL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT v. CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

More information

INSURANCE AND MISSOURI LAW

INSURANCE AND MISSOURI LAW INSURANCE AND MISSOURI LAW After suffering a significant injury, most people understandably concentrate on the relatively straightforward elements of damages and liability. In doing so, however, injured

More information

(Filed 19 December 2000) 1. Insurance--automobile--parent s claim for minor s medical expenses--derivative of child s claim

(Filed 19 December 2000) 1. Insurance--automobile--parent s claim for minor s medical expenses--derivative of child s claim ROBERTA HOLT, Guardian Ad Litem for MARY ELIZABETH HOLT, a minor; and ROBERTA HOLT, Plaintiffs, v. ATLANTIC CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant No. COA99-1481 (Filed 19 December 2000) 1. Insurance--automobile--parent

More information

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT

2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U. No. 1-13-3918 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT 2016 IL App (1st) 133918-U No. 1-13-3918 SIXTH DIVISION May 6, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

Prepare today. Play tomorrow.

Prepare today. Play tomorrow. Prepare today. Play tomorrow. Illinois Life & Disability Plans 14.02.107.1-IL (12/04) Part of any financial plan is protection against life s unexpected events. Aetna s Life and Disability products raise

More information

By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation)

By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation) Tiara Condominium: The Demise of the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation and Impact on the Property Damage Requirement in a General Liability Policy By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, DEFENDANT.

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, DEFENDANT. 2000 WI App 171 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0776 Complete Title of Case: RONNIE PROPHET AND BADON PROPHET, V. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY, INC.,

More information

TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER DEC 14 2004. Clerk RONALD A. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, No. 03-1186 (D.C. No. 01-MK-1626) (D. Colo.

TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER DEC 14 2004. Clerk RONALD A. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, No. 03-1186 (D.C. No. 01-MK-1626) (D. Colo. F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 14 2004 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk RONALD A. PETERSON, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY

More information

HARRIS v AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION. Docket No. 144579. Argued March 6, 2013 (Calendar No. 7). Decided July 29, 2013.

HARRIS v AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASSOCIATION. Docket No. 144579. Argued March 6, 2013 (Calendar No. 7). Decided July 29, 2013. Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus This syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. Chief

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-10510 Document: 00513424063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 15, 2016 Lyle W.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHAREN W. WELLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED May 24, 2011 v No. 294394 Lake Circuit Court HARRY LEE MCCULLOUGH, LC No. 09-007559-NI and Defendant, HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE

More information

TRINITY V. COWAN: MENTAL ANGUISH IS NOT BODILY INJURY AND AN INTENTIONAL TORT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT

TRINITY V. COWAN: MENTAL ANGUISH IS NOT BODILY INJURY AND AN INTENTIONAL TORT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT TRINITY V. COWAN: MENTAL ANGUISH IS NOT BODILY INJURY AND AN INTENTIONAL TORT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT By David Plaut Hanna & Plaut, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law 106 E. 6th Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701 Phone

More information

DIVISION ONE. SALLY ANN BEAVER, a single woman, Plaintiff/Appellee,

DIVISION ONE. SALLY ANN BEAVER, a single woman, Plaintiff/Appellee, IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE SALLY ANN BEAVER, a single woman, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

Volunteers Insurance Service Association, Inc.

Volunteers Insurance Service Association, Inc. Volunteers Insurance Service Association, Inc. CONTENTS Message To Volunteers Excess Accident Medical Coverages Accidental Death and Dismemberment Coverage Exclusions to Accident Insurance Personal Liability

More information

Dissecting the Professional Services Exclusion in a Commercial General Liability Policy

Dissecting the Professional Services Exclusion in a Commercial General Liability Policy Dissecting the Professional Services Exclusion in a Commercial General Liability Policy Lewis S. Wooton December 15, 2010 Most commercial general liability policies contain a professional services exclusion

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TERRY E. BLUM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:03CV401 CDP ) ALLSTATE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON COUNTY ) ) BETTY CHRISTY, ) ) ) )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON COUNTY ) ) BETTY CHRISTY, ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON COUNTY BETTY CHRISTY, Plaintiff, vs. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No: 0-0-L ORDER ON PLAINTIFF

More information

CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE

CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE AND WORKERS COMPENSATION Melissa Healy INTRODUCTION In Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the Arizona Supreme Court

More information

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Keyser, 2011 IL App (3d) 090484 Appellate Court Caption ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES W.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ESTATE OF TIMOTHY HUGHES, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 23, 2007 v No. 259987 Oakland Circuit Court CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 2000-024949-CZ and Defendant/Cross-Defendant-

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-148 (HL) ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-148 (HL) ORDER Case 7:12-cv-00148-HL Document 43 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 11 CHRISTY LYNN WATFORD, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY : MAY TERM, 2004 & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, : No. 0621

More information

Summary Plan Description NEA Complimentary Life Insurance (DUES-TAB) (Revised September 2008)

Summary Plan Description NEA Complimentary Life Insurance (DUES-TAB) (Revised September 2008) NEA Members Insurance Trust The National Education Association sponsors the NEA Members Insurance Trust Summary Plan Description NEA Complimentary Life Insurance (DUES-TAB) This is to certify that, as

More information

A Voluntary Personal Accident Insurance Program designed for the Eligible Employees of Unity Health System

A Voluntary Personal Accident Insurance Program designed for the Eligible Employees of Unity Health System A Voluntary Personal Accident Insurance Program designed for the Eligible Employees of Unity Health System IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Program provides ACCIDENT insurance only. It does NOT provide basic hospital,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:01 CV 726 DDN VENETIAN TERRAZZO, INC., Defendant. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Pursuant

More information

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the

Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information