Efficient Risk Sharing with Limited Commitment and Hidden Storage


 Ambrose French
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Efficien Risk Sharing wih Limied Commimen and Hidden Sorage Árpád Ábrahám and Sarola Laczó March 30, 2012 Absrac We exend he model of risk sharing wih limied commimen e.g. Kocherlakoa, 1996) by inroducing boh a privae nonconracible and/or nonobservable) and a public sorage echnology. We firs show ha agens Euler consrains are violaed a he consrainedefficien allocaion of he basic model under general condiions. We hen sudy a problem where agens defaul and saving incenives are boh aken ino accoun. We show ha when he planner and he agens have access o he same ineremporal echnology, agens no longer wan o sore a he consrainedefficien allocaion. The reason is ha he planner has more incenive o save, because she inernalizes he posiive effec of aggregae asses on fuure risk sharing by relaxing paricipaion consrains. Public sorage is posiive even when here is no aggregae uncerainy and he reurn on sorage is below he discoun rae. This is in conras o he case where hidden income or effor is he deep fricion ha limis risk sharing e.g. Cole and Kocherlakoa, 2001). We also show ha asses remain sochasic whenever only moderae risk sharing is implemenable in he long run, bu become consan if high bu sill imperfec risk sharing is he longrun oucome. However, if he reurn on he ineremporal echnolgy is as high as he discoun rae, perfec risk sharing is always selfenforcing in he long run. Furher, higher consumpion inequaliy implies higher public asse accumulaion. In erms of consumpion dynamics, we overurn hree counerfacual predicions of he basic limied commimen model. In paricular, he amnesia and persisence properies do no hold in our model when asses are sochasic in he long run. Furher, agens Euler inequaliies hold by consrucion. Keywords: risk sharing, limied commimen, hidden sorage, dynamic conracs JEL codes: E20 We hank Andy Akeson, Hugo Hopenhayn, Yang K. Lu, Alessandro Mennuni, Raffaele Rossi, and seminar and conference paricipans a SAET in Faro, Bank of Hungary, ESEM in Oslo, Universia Auònoma de Barcelona, UCLA, Universiy of Bonn, Insiue for Economic Analysis IAECSIC), RES PhD Meeing in London, Universia Pompeu Fabra, Paris School of Economics, Cardiff Business School, Federal Reserve Bank of S. Louis, and Universiy of Rocheser for useful commens and suggesions. All errors are our own. European Universiy Insiue, Deparmen of Economics, Villa San Paolo, Via della Piazzuola 43, Firenze FI), Ialy. Universiy of California, Los Angeles, Deparmen of Economics, Bunche Hall 9367, Los Angeles, CA 90095, Unied Saes. 1
2 1 Inroducion In he exising models of risk sharing wih limied commimen, agens incenive o deviae from he consrainedefficien allocaion by saving is ignored. A he same ime, i has been shown ha hidden sorage reduces risk sharing in environmens wih privae informaion fricions, see Allen 1985), Cole and Kocherlakoa 2001), and Ábrahám, Koehne, and Pavoni 2011). To our knowledge, only observable and conracable saving has been considered in he limied commimen framework, see Ligon, Thomas, and Worrall 2000). In ha environmen, he opimal allocaion is condiioned on individual asse holdings, while his is no possible when savings are hidden. In several economic conexs where he model of risk sharing wih limied commimen has been applied, agens are likely o have a way o save, using some backyard echnology or simple sorage. In he conex of village economies Ligon, Thomas, and Worrall, 2002), households may keep grain or cash around he house for selfinsure purposes. Households in he Unied Saes Krueger and Perri, 2006) may keep savings in cash or hide heir asses abroad. Spouses wihin a household Mazzocco, 2007) may also keep savings for personal use. In all hese examples he amoun of privae savings is no observable and/or conracible. This paper exends he lieraure on risk sharing wih limied commimen by inroducing a privae nonconracible and/or nonobservable) sorage echnology ha agens have access o, as well as a public sorage echnology. Our saring poin is he wosided lack of commimen framework of Kocherlakoa 1996), ha we will ofen refer o as he basic model hereafer. Agens are infiniely lived, risk averse, and exane idenical. They receive a risky endowmen each period. We assume ha here is no aggregae uncerainy. Agens may make ransfers o each oher in order o smooh heir consumpion. These ransfers are subjec o limied commimen, i.e. each agen mus be a leas as well off as in auarky a each ime and sae of he world. The sorage echnology we inroduce allows agens o ransfer consumpion from one period o he nex and earn a ne reurn r. 1 Borrowing is no allowed. Access o hidden sorage no only changes he value of auarky, bu i may also enlarge he se of possible deviaions along he equilibrium pah. Tha is, agens could defaul, or sore, or boh a he same ime or in differen periods. We firs sudy under wha condiions agens have an incenive o sore a he consrainedefficien allocaion of he basic model when sorage yields zero ineres. We refer o his 1 The reurn r can ake any value such ha 1 r 1 β 1, where β is he subjecive discoun facor. If r = 1, we are back o he basic model. We say ha he sorage echnology is efficien if r = 1 β 1. 2
3 ineremporal echnology as pure sorage. We show ha if income akes a leas hree values, he possibiliy of hidden pure sorage will affec he consrainedefficien allocaion direcly, i.e. agens Euler consrains will be violaed, whenever he soluion is no oo close o full insurance. Aferwards, we show ha whenever risk sharing is parial, here exiss a hreshold reurn on sorage, r < 1 1, above which he Euler consrain binds a he consrainedefficien allocaion. This means ha whenever he reurn on privae sorage is high β enough where some r 0 can be high enough), and he basic limied commimen model exhibis relaively lile risk sharing, he consrainedefficien allocaion in he basic model is no incenive compaible if agens have access o hidden sorage. In oher words, hidden sorage maers under general condiions. 2 The key inuiion is ha, in he consrainedopimal allocaion, agens wih high curren income and consumpion face a decreasing ineremporal paern of consumpion. canno be incenive compaible. If he reurn on sorage is high enough, his consumpion pah Aferwards, we describe our model, where agens incenive o defaul on ransfers and heir incenive o save are boh aken ino accoun, unlike in he previous lieraure. This means ha, in addiion o he paricipaion/enforceabiliy consrains ha make sure ha agens will no defaul, he Euler inequaliies of boh agens become consrains o rule ou deviaions by sorage, under he firsorder condiion approach. 3 We allow he social planner o save using he same ineremporal echnology as he agens. Wihou allowing he social planner o sore, he feasible se may be empy when agens have access o sorage in auarky. Public savings are also relevan for applicaions. Think of communiy grain sorage faciliies in developing counries or he European Financial Sabiliy Faciliy and he proposed European Sabiliy Mechanism for he euro area. In he res of his paper, we focus on he consrainedefficien allocaions in his environmen. Wih agens Euler inequaliies as consrains, he emporary Pareo weighs Marce and Marimon, 2011) or promised uiliies Abreu, Pearce, and Sacchei, 1990) are no longer sufficien saisics o summarize he pas hisory of income realizaions. In models wih a dynamic moral hazard problem, hidden sorage can be accommodaed in a recursive manner using he agen s marginal uiliy as a cosae variable Werning, 2001; Ábrahám and Pavoni, 2008). In our environmen, his approach would raise serious racabiliy issues, because we would need wo more coninuous cosae variables, in addiion o keeping rack of individ 2 Noe ha his resul does no hinge on how exacly agens ouside opion is specified. In paricular, hey may or may no be allowed o sore in auarky, and hey may or no face addiional punishmen for defauling. 3 We will laer show ha he firsorder condiion approach is valid. 3
4 ual asse holdings and he cosae variable needed o make he paricipaion consrains recursive. Insead of adding hese sae variables, we analyze he social planner s problem ignoring agens Euler consrains. This provides an imporan resul: if he social planner s Euler consrain is saisfied, which is a necessary condiion of opimaliy, agens no longer have an incenive o save. Therefore, he soluion of his simpler problem is idenical o he one where agens have a hidden sorage opporuniy. In oher words, hidden sorage no longer maers. The inuiion behind his resul is ha he planner has more incenive o save han he agens. Firs, he planner sores for he agens hereby eliminaing heir incenives o use he hidden ineremporal echnology, and second, sorage by he planner makes i easier o saisfy agens paricipaion consrains in he fuure. This is due o he fac ha, by increasing asses, he planner increases oal fuure consumpion available for agens if hey say in he risk sharing arrangemen. Since agens are excluded from he benefis of he public asse afer defaul, he higher he amoun of accumulaed public asses is, he lower agens incenives o defaul are. In oher words, he planner inernalizes he posiive effec of aggregae asses on fuure risk sharing, while he agens do no. I follows ha whenever hidden sorage maers, i.e. agens Euler consrains are violaed a he consrainedefficien soluion of he basic model wih sorage in auarky, he social planner uses he available sorage echnology, a leas when income inequaliy is highes. This happens even hough here is no aggregae uncerainy and he sorage echnology is inferior, i.e. he reurn on sorage is lower han he discoun rae or, β1 + r) < 1). Sorage by he planner makes he marke more complee in his environmen. Noe ha his is in conras o he case where privae informaion is he deep fricion ha limis risk sharing Cole and Kocherlakoa, 2001; Ábrahám and Pavoni, 2008). There, sorage by he planner would worsen he informaion revelaion problem, herefore i does no occur in equilibrium. We furher show ha whenever hidden sorage maers in he basic model wih sorage in auarky, he sock of public asses is someimes nonzero and is bounded in he long run. If β1 + r) < 1, asses remain sochasic in he long run if risk sharing is considerably limied in he sense ha paricipaion consrain of each agen binds a more han one income level. We show ha in his case here exiss an ergodic disribuion of asses, ha may or may no include zero. Oherwise, asses converge o a sricly posiive finie value. Furher, given inheried asses, sorage will always be higher when crosssecional consumpion inequaliy is higher. This paern holds for shorrun asse dynamics in general, i.e. also when asses are consan in he long run. The inuiion for hese resuls is ha he planner s and 4
5 agens ) saving incenives depend on he consumpion disribuion. Whenever each agen s paricipaion consrain binds for more han one income level in he long run, hese incenives vary over ime as he consumpion disribuion varies over ime. This is no rue when he paricipaion consrain binds only a he highes income level for each agen, hence asses converge o a seadysae level in ha case. If β1 + r) = 1, i is opimal for he planner o fully complee he marke by sorage in he long run. Tha is, perfec risk sharing is selfenforcing in he long run in his case. This is because he radeoff beween imperfec insurance and an inefficien ineremporal echnology is no longer presen. The inroducion of sorage has ineresing implicaions for he dynamics of consumpion prediced by he model. Firs, he amnesia propery, i.e. ha he consumpion disribuion only depends on he curren income of he agen wih a binding paricipaion consrain and is independen of he pas hisory of shocks whenever a paricipaion consrain binds Kocherlakoa, 1996), does no hold when asses are sochasic in he long run. The inuiion behind his resul is ha he curren consumpion disribuion depends on boh curren income and inheried asses, even when a paricipaion consrain binds. In oher words, he pas hisory of income realizaions affecs curren consumpions hrough aggregae asses. Second, he persisence propery of he basic model, i.e. ha he consumpion allocaion does no change for small changes in he income disribuion, does no hold eiher when asses are sochasic in he long run. Even hough he sharing rule deermining he consumpion allocaion is he same as in he previous period when neiher paricipaion consrain binds, consumpion is only consan if ne savings are idenical in he previous and he curren period. This does no happen when asses are sochasic in he long run.s Daa on household income and consumpion suppor neiher he amnesia, nor he srong persisence propery of he basic model see Broer 2011) for an exensive analysis). Hence, hese differences are seps in he righ direcion for his framework o explain consumpion dynamics. Third, he Euler consrain, a leas in is inequaliy form, canno be rejeced in micro daa from developed economies once labor supply decisions and demographics are appropriaely accouned for Aanasio, 1999). Since in our model he agens Euler inequaliies are saisfied by consrucion, we bring limied commimen models in line wih his observaion as well. In his paper, we also propose an algorihm o solve he model numerically. Using our algorihm, we presen some compued examples o illusrae he effecs of he availabiliy of sorage on risk sharing. We also invesigae he consequences of changing he discoun facor and he reurn on sorage on he dynamics of asses and consumpion. We, however, leave 5
6 sudying he quaniaive implicaions of sorage for he dynamics of consumpion o fuure work. The res of he paper is srucured as follows. Secion 2 inroduces and characerizes he basic model wihou access o any ineremporal echnology. Secion 3 sudies wheher and under wha condiions Euler consrains are binding a he consrainedefficien allocaion of he basic model. Secion 4 inroduces hidden and public sorage and derives he main resuls of he paper. Secion 5 presens some compued examples. Secion 6 concludes. 2 The basic model wihou sorage We consider an endowmen economy wih wo ypes of agens, i = {1, 2}, each of uni measure, who are infiniely lived and risk averse. All agens are exane idenical in he sense ha hey have he same preferences and are endowed wih he same exogenous random income process. Agens in he same group are expos idenical as well, meaning ha heir income realizaions are he same a each ime. 4 Le u) denoe he uiliy funcion, ha is sricly increasing, sricly concave, and coninuously differeniable. Assume ha he Inada condiions hold. Le s denoe he income sae realized a ime and s he hisory of income realizaions, ha is, s = s 1, s 2,..., s ). Given s, agen 1 has income ys ), while agen 2 has income equal o Y ys )), where Y is aggregae income. Noe ha here is no aggregae uncerainy by assumpion. We furher assume ha income has a discree suppor, ha is, s { s 1,..., s j,..., s N} wih ys j ) < ys j+1 ), and is independenly and idenically disribued i.i.d.), ha is, Pr s = s j ) = π j,. The wo ypes of agens framework ogeher wih he no aggregae uncerainy assumpion imposes some symmery on boh he income realizaions and he probabiliies. In paricular, ys j ) = Y ys N j+1 ) and π j = π N j+1. The i.i.d. assumpion can be relaxed as long as weak posiive dependence is mainained, i.e. he expeced ne presen value of fuure lifeime income is weakly increasing in curren income. Suppose ha risk sharing is limied by wosided lack of commimen o risk sharing conracs, i.e. insurance ransfers have o be volunary, or, selfenforcing, as in Thomas and Worrall 1988), Kocherlakoa 1996), and ohers. Each agen may decide a any ime and sae o defaul and rever o auarky. This means ha only hose risk sharing conracs are susainable which provide a lifeime uiliy a leas as grea as auarky afer any hisory 4 We will refer o agen 1 and agen 2 below. Equivalenly, we could say ype1 and ype2 agens, or agen belonging o group 1 and group 2. 6
7 of income realizaions for each agen. We assume ha he punishmen for deviaion is exclusion from risk sharing arrangemens in he fuure. This is he mos severe subgameperfec punishmen in his conex. In oher words, i is an opimal penal code in he sense of Abreu 1988). The consrainedefficien risk sharing conrac is he soluion o he following opimizaion problem: where λ i max c i s ) 2 i=1 λ i =1 s β Pr ) s u c )) i s, 1) is he iniial) Pareoweigh of agen i, β is he discoun facor, Prs ) is he probabiliy of hisory s occurring, and c i s ) is he consumpion of agen i when hisory s has occurred; subjec o he resource consrains, and he paricipaion consrains, r= s r 2 c ) i s Y, s, 2) i=1 β r Pr s r s ) u c i s r )) Ui au s ), s, i, 3) where Prs r s ) is he condiional probabiliy of hisory s r occurring given ha hisory s occurred up o ime, and Ui au s ) is he expeced lifeime uiliy of agen i when in auarky if sae s has occurred oday. In mahemaical erms, and U au 1 s ) = u ys )) + β 1 β U au 2 s ) = u Y ys )) + β 1 β N π j u ys j ) ) 4) j=1 N π j u ys j ) ). Noe ha he main qualiaive resuls would remain he same under differen punishmens as long as he sric monooniciy of he auarky value is mainained. For example, agens could save in auarky as in Krueger and Perri, 2006), or hey migh endure addiional punishmen for defauling from he communiy as in Ligon, Thomas, and Worrall, 2002). j=1 2.1 Characerizaion of he basic model This model has been well sudied in he lieraure. We briefly derive and describe he main characerisics, in paricular hose which urn ou o be imporan for our analysis of he 7
8 ineracion beween limied commimen and hidden sorage. Our characerizaion is based on he recursive Lagrangian approach of Marce and Marimon 2011). However, he same resuls can be obained using he promised uiliy approach see a exbook descripion in Ljungqvis and Sargen, 2004). Le β Pr s ) µ i s ) denoe he Lagrange muliplier on he paricipaion consrain, 3), and le β Pr s ) γ s ) be he Lagrange muliplier on he resource consrain, 2), when hisory s has occurred. Then, he Lagrangian can be wrien as L = β Pr ) { [ 2 s λ i u c )) i s =1 s r= s r i=1 +µ ) i s β r Pr )] s r s ) u c i s r )) Ui au s ) =1 +γ s ) Y i c i s ))}. Using he ideas of Marce and Marimon 2011), we can wrie he Lagrangian in he form L = β Pr ) { 2 [ ) s Mi s u c )) i s µ ) i s Ui au s ) ] =1 s i=1 +γ s ) Y i c i s ))}, where M i s ) = M i s 1 ) + µ i s ) and M i s 0 ) = λ i. The necessary firsorder condiion 5 wih respec o agen i s consumpion when hisory s has occurred is L c i s ) = M ) i s u c )) i s γ s ) = 0. Combining such firsorder condiions for agen 1 and agen 2, we have x s ) M 1 s ) M 2 s ) = u c 2 s )) u c 1 s )). 5) Here x s ) is he emporary Pareo weigh of agen 1 relaive o agen 2. 6 Defining υ i s ) = µ i s ) /M i s ) and using he definiions of x s ) and M i s ), we can obain he law of moion of x as x s ) = xs 1 ) 1 υ 2 s ) 1 υ 1 s ). 6) 5 Under general condiions, hese condiions are also sufficien ogeher wih he paricipaion and resource consrains. 6 To reinforce his inerpreaion, noice ha if no paricipaion consrain binds in hisory s for eiher agen, i.e. µ 1 s τ ) = µ 2 s τ ) = 0 for all subhisories s τ s, hen x s ) = λ 1 /λ 2 is he iniial relaive Pareo weigh of agen i. 8
9 Noice ha given c 2 s ) = Y c 1 s ), he sric concaviy of he uiliy funcion implies ha boh consumpion levels are uniquely deermined by x s ) defined in equaion 5). In paricular, we have ha c 1 s ) is a sricly increasing funcion of x s ). Noe also ha whenever neiher agen s paricipaion consrain binds, i.e. υ 1 s ) = υ 2 s ) = 0, hen he emporary relaive Pareo weigh, x, and consequenly he consumpion levels, remain consan. This implies ha for small changes in he income disribuion which do no rigger a binding paricipaion consrain he consumpion allocaion does no respond. This propery is ofen called an exreme form of persisence. In conras, when a paricipaion consrain binds, he relaive Pareo weigh is adjused. In paricular, he relaive posiion of he agen wih a binding consrain will improve, i.e. υ 1 s ) > 0 implies x s ) > xs 1 ), and υ 2 s ) > 0 implies x s ) < xs 1 ). Moreover, noice ha a his poin we jump o a new relaive Pareo weigh which makes him jus indifferen beween defauling or no given his curren level of income. I is easy o see ha his relaive Pareo weigh only depends on his curren income and no he pas hisory. This implies ha when he Pareo weighs, and hence consumpions, change beween periods, he new levels are solely deermined by he income level of he agen whose paricipaion consrain is currenly binding. The lieraure ofen refers o his propery as amnesia. The soluion of he model is fully characerized by a se of saedependen inervals on he relaive Pareo weigh, x, which give he possible relaive weighs in each income sae for agen 1. Denoe he inerval for sae s j by [ x j, x j]. x j is defined as he lowes relaive Pareo weigh such ha agen 1, wih income ys j ), is willing o say in he risk sharing arrangemen, and x j is he highes relaive Pareo weigh such ha agen 2, wih income Y ys j )), is indifferen beween paricipaing and defauling. In oher words, a he lower limi of hese inervals agen 1 s paricipaion consrain is binding, while a he upper limi agen 2 s paricipaion consrain is binding. Denoe by x he new relaive Pareo weigh of agen 1 o be found a ime. Suppose ha las period he raio of marginal uiliies was x 1, and oday he income sae is s j. The relaive weigh of agen 1 oday is deermined by he following updaing rule: x j if x 1 > x j x = x 1 if x 1 [ x j, x j]. 7) x j if x 1 < x j This means ha he raio of marginal uiliies is kep consan for any wo agens whenever his does no violae he paricipaion consrain of eiher of hem. When he paricipaion consrain binds for agen 1, he relaive Pareo weigh moves o he lower limi of he opimal inerval, jus making sure ha his agen is indifferen beween saying and defauling. 9
10 Similarly, when agen 2 s paricipaion consrain binds, he relaive Pareo weigh moves o he upper limi of he opimal inerval. Thereby i is guaraneed ha as much risk sharing as possible is achieved while saisfying he paricipaion consrains. Given ha consumpion of agen 1 is a sricly increasing funcion of x, exacly he same characerizaion holds for consumpion dynamics. Hence, nex we analyze he dynamics of consumpion direcly. Define he limis of he opimal consumpion inervals as c j : x j = u Y c j) u c j) and cj : x j = u Y c j ). u c j ) I is easy o see ha, unless auarky is he only implemenable allocaion, we have ha c j > c j, for some j. 7 Moreover, given ha he value of auarky is increasing in curren income see 4)), i is easy o see ha c j > c j 1 and c j > c j 1, for all 1 < j N. Finally, noe ha symmery implies ha c j found in Ljungqvis and Sargen 2004). = c N j+1. The proofs of all hese saemens can be Given hese resuls, we will illusrae he dynamics of consumpion using a graphical represenaion. We will focus on scenarios where he longrun equilibrium is characerized by imperfec risk sharing. We do his boh because here is overwhelming evidence from several applicaions households in a village or in he Unied Saes, spouses in a household, counries) abou less han perfec risk sharing, and because ha case is heoreically no ineresing, as i is equivalen o he wellknown unconsrained) efficien allocaion of consan individual consumpions over ime. Using our noaion, perfec risk sharing is obained in he long run if x 1 x N, or, equivalenly, if c 1 c N. In oher words, if here exiss a Pareo weigh where neiher agen s paricipaion consrain is violaed for all income saes. Hence, we assume from now on ha c 1 < c N, i.e. risk sharing is imperfec in he long run. I is no difficul o see ha he law of moion described by 7) will imply ha risk sharing arrangemens subjec o limied commimen are characerized by a finie se of consumpion values deermined by he limis of he opimal consumpion inervals. I urns ou ha, for boh he benchmark model and our model wih hidden sorage, considering wo disinc scenarios is enough o describe he general picure: i) each agen s paricipaion consrain is binding only when his income is highes, and ii) each agen s paricipaion consrain is binding in more han one sae. Furher, o describe he consrainedefficien allocaions in hese wo scenarios, i is sufficien o consider hree income saes, i.e. N = 3. 7 If in auarky agens simply consume heir curren income every period, hen some risk sharing implies c j > c j, j. If sorage is allowed in auarky, hen i migh be ha no ransfer is made when crosssecional income inequaliy is high, bu insurance ransfers do occur in saes when inequaliy is low. 10
11 Consider an endowmen process where each agen ges y h, y m, or y l unis of he consumpion good, wih y h > y m > y l, wih probabiliies π h, π m, and π l, respecively. Symmery implies ha y m = y h + y l )/2 and π e π h = π l = 1 π m )/2, where he upper index e refers o he mos exreme, i.e. mos unequal, income disribuion. We will refer o a sae s j when agen 1 has income y j. Given he uiliy funcion and he income process, he inervals for differen saes may overlap or no depending on he discoun facor, β. If β is sufficienly large, hen perfec risk sharing is selfenforcing by a sandard folk heorem Kimball, 1988). In his case, c l c h, and perfec risk sharing is implemenable in he long run. If β is sufficienly small, here does no exis any nonauarkic allocaion ha is susainable wih volunary paricipaion. In his case, each consumpion inerval collapses o one poin, y j, j = {l, m, h}. For inermediae levels of he discoun facor, parial insurance occurs. If parial insurance occurs, here are wo possible scenarios depending in he level of he discoun facor. For higher levels of β, c m c h > c l c m. This means ha he consumpion inerval for sae s m overlaps wih he inervals associaed wih boh he s h and he s l sae. This is he case where each agen s paricipaion consrain binds for he highes income level only. Figure 1 presens an example saisfying hese condiions. Suppose curren consumpion of agen 1 is below c h. When agen 1 draws a high income realizaion which occurs wih probabiliy 1 in he long run), his consumpion jumps o c h. Then i says a ha level unil his income jumps o he lowes level. A ha period, agen 2 s paricipaion consrain binds, because he has high income, and consumpion of agen 1 will drop o c l. Then we are back o where we sared from. This implies ha consumpion akes only wo values, c h and c l in he long run. When consumpion changes, i always moves beween hese wo levels, and he pas hisory of income realizaions does no maer. This is he way he aforemenioned amnesia propery presens iself in his case. When sae s m occurs afer sae s h or sae s l, he consumpion allocaion remains unchanged. Tha is, consumpion does no reac a all o his small change in income. This is he aforemenioned persisence propery. Noe ha consumpion also remains unchanged over ime if he sequence h, m, h) or he sequence l, m, l) akes place. Anoher key observaion here is ha, alhough individuals face consumpion changes over ime, he consumpion disribuion is consan over ime. In every period, half of he agens consume c h and he oher half consume c l. Finally, noe ha exacly his case occurs for any N if c 2 c N > c 1 c N 1. For lower levels of β, none of he hree inervals overlap, i.e. c h > c m > c m > c l. Figure 2 11
12 Figure 1: The inerval for sae s m overlaps wih he inervals for sae s h and sae s l shows an example of his second case. When all hree inervals are disjunc, consumpion akes four values in he long run. To see his, noice ha he paricipaion consrain of agen 1 binds boh for medium and high level of income. Tha is, whenever his income changes his consumpion will change as well, and similarly for agen 2. In his second case, in sae s m he pas hisory deermines which agen s paricipaion consrain binds, herefore consumpion is Markovian. Curren incomes and he ideniy of he agen wih a binding paricipaion consrain fully deermine he consumpion allocaion. The dynamics of consumpion exhibi amnesia in his sense here. Furher, consumpion responds o every income change, hence he persisence propery does no manifes iself. The key observaion for laer reference is ha he consumpion disribuion changes beween {c m, c m } and { c l, c h}. Tha is, he crosssecional disribuion of consumpion is differen whenever sae s m occurs from when an unequal income sae, s h or s l, occurs. If here are N > 3 income saes, he crosssecional consumpion disribuion changes over ime whenever c 2 < c N and c 1 < c N 1. Depending on he number of income saes and 12
13 Figure 2: The saedependen inervals are all disjunc he number of saes where a paricipaion consrain binds, he persisence propery may appear. 3 Does hidden sorage maer? In his secion, we sudy wheher and under wha condiions agens would save a he consrainedefficien soluion of he basic model. We assume ha parial insurance occurs a he soluion he ineresing case). If Euler consrains are violaed, he soluion is no robus o deviaions when hidden sorage is available. We firs sudy he case where he ineremporal echnology is pure sorage, defined as an ineremporal echnology ha yields zero ineres. Then, we consider he oher benchmark case where he ineres rae is as high as he rae of ime preference, i.e. β1 + r) = 1, as well as he general case of any reurn on sorage. 13
14 3.1 Pure sorage When he available ineremporal echnology is pure sorage, i.e. r = 0, we sudy he wo cases we have idenified in he previous secion: i) only wo consumpion levels occur in he long run, i.e. he level of risk sharing is high, and ii) a paricipaion consrain binds for more han one income level for each agens, or, more han wo consumpion levels occur in equilibrium, i.e he level of risk sharing is more moderae. We show ha hey are indeed qualiaively differen, as hidden pure sorage will maer in he laer bu no in he former case Two consumpion levels in he long run Assume ha we are in a siuaion where, alhough income can ake N values, he opimal allocaion of he basic model feaures only wo levels of consumpion, c h > c l. This means ha a paricipaion consrain binds only when income inequaliy is highes. In paricular, if he agen s curren consumpion is c h, hen i remains c h as long as he oher agen s income does no reach he highes level. This happens when agen 1 s income level is lowes. Hence, he probabiliy of swiching o c l is equal o he probabiliy of he lowes income sae, denoed again by π e. Therefore, given ha an agen s consumpion is c h oday, π e is he probabiliy of swiching o c l, and 1 π e ) is he probabiliy ha his consumpion remains c h. I is easy o see ha agens would have an incenive o save/sore only if hey have high consumpion oday, because a ha poin hey face a consumpion profile which is weakly decreasing. Hence, hidden sorage maers a he consrainedopimal allocaion if agens Euler consrains are violaed when hey consume c h, ha is, if we have u c h ) < β [ 1 π e ) u c h ) + π e u c l ) ]. 8) Given ha c l = Y c h, i is clear ha here exiss a level of high consumpion, ĉ h, where 8) is saisfied wih equaliy: u ĉ h ) = β [ 1 π e ) u ĉ h ) + π e u Y ĉ h ) ]. 9) This is he case, because, on he one hand, as c h is approaching Y/2 and consequenly c l ), he lef hand side of inequaliy 8) is higher, given β < 1. On he oher hand, as c h is geing close o Y and consequenly c l o 0), he righ hand side of inequaliy 8) is higher, because lim c l 0 u c l ) = by he relevan Inada condiion. Hence, agens would like o use he pure sorage echnology in equilibrium if and only if c h > ĉ h. In wha follows we will show ha his never happens. 14
15 In order o do his, we firs show ha ĉ h is also he level of high consumpion which provides he highes lifeime uiliy, given ha he agen sars wih high consumpion. Lemma 1. ĉ h maximizes welfare for he agen wih high consumpion oday across all possible consumpion values if consumpion akes only wo values. Proof. The expeced lifeime uiliy of an agen who receives he high consumpion, denoed by θ h, a ime is V θ h) = u θ h) + β [ τ Pr c +τ = θ h) u c h) + 1 Pr c +τ = θ h)) u Y θ h)] τ=1 = u θ h) + V θ h) [ β1 π e ) + ] β τ π e ) 2 1 π e ) τ 2 τ=2 + u Y θ h) β τ π e 1 π e ) τ 1. τ=1 Then, V θ h) can be expressed as V θ h) = 1 1 β 1 β1 π e )) u θ h) + βπ e u Y θ h). 1 β1 2π e ) The level of consumpion, denoed by c h, which maximizes her lifeime uiliy is given by c h = arg max θ h 1 1 β 1 β1 π e )) u θ h) + βπ e u Y θ h). 1 β1 2π e ) The necessary and sufficien firsorder condiion for his problem is u c h ) = β [ 1 π e )u c h ) + π e u Y c h ) ]. 10) Comparing 9) and 10) he resul follows. Given his resul, i is inuiive ha i should never be opimal o implemen any consumpion level higher han ĉ h = c h. The following proposiion proves his saemen formally. Proposiion 1. If consumpion akes only wo values in he long run a he soluion of he basic model, hen agens have no incenive o use a pure sorage echnology. Proof. The proof is by conradicion. Assume ha c h > c h. Then we can consruc an alernaive allocaion which makes boh agens beer off and does no violae any paricipaion consrain. The alernaive conrac is given by c h. By consrucion, his level of consumpion makes he agen wih high consumpion oday beer off, since c h maximizes his lifeime 15
16 uiliy. The agen wih low consumpion is also clearly beer off, because he enjoys boh higher consumpion currenly, since c h > c h implies ha Y c h > Y c h, and a reducion of risk in he fuure, since he allocaion c h, Y c h ) is a mean preserving spread of c h, Y c h ). We have increased he lifeime uiliy of boh agens, herefore he paricipaion consrains canno be violaed. This implies ha we canno have a consrainedefficien allocaion such ha c h > c h. Then Lemma 1 and equaion 9) imply ha agens will no have an incenive o use a pure sorage echnology. Proposiion 1 means ha he opimal allocaion will always implemen such a low level of consumpion variaion ha agens will have no incenive o use a pure sorage echnology. I is worh noing ha he N = 2 case will always fall ino his caegory, because here canno be more han wo levels of consumpion in he longrun equilibrium. Second, as we discussed above, more generally his case represens risk sharing siuaions where a considerable amoun of risk sharing is achieved. Proposiion 1 shows ha his amoun of risk sharing is sufficien o eliminae agens sorage incenives, and asses are a heir firsbes level, zero, in his environmen wih no aggregae risk More han wo consumpion levels in he long run Le us now consider he case where he paricipaion consrain binds for a leas wo income levels for each agen. Considering hree income saes is sufficien o derive our main resul. We use he noaion which was inroduced in Secion 2. The key assumpion here is ha a paricipaion consrain is binding in he inermediae sae s m as well, in addiion o he exreme saes, s h and s l, in he longrun equilibrium, see Figure 2. Consider now he following hypoheical consumpion allocaion: he high low) income agen consumes θ h Y θ h ) and in sae s m boh agens consume ȳ = Y/2. Le us now define ĉ h as he high consumpion level for which he agen s Euler holds wih equaliy if he consumes θ h, ȳ, and Y θ h in saes s h, s m, and s l, respecively. In mahemaical erms, ĉ h is he soluion o u ĉ h ) = β [ π e u ĉ h ) + π m u ȳ) + π e u Y ĉ h ) ]. 11) Noe ha his also means ha agens would use he pure sorage echnology in auarky as long as y h > ĉ h. Similarly, le us now define c h as he high consumpion level ha maximizes he lifeime uiliy of his agen. The firsorder condiion ha characerizes c h is u c h ) = β [ π e u c h ) + π e u Y c h ) ]. 12) The following lemma will be useful o esablish wheher he Euler consrain may bind a he soluion of he basic model wih hree income saes. 16
17 Lemma 2. ĉ h < c h when income akes hree values. Proof. I is enough o verify ha he Euler inequaliy is no saisfied a c h. The righ hand side of equaion 11) includes an addiional posiive erm, π m u ȳ), compared o equaion 12), hus he Euler consrain is violaed a c h. Noe ha his resul differs from wha we have found in he case where consumpion akes only wo values. In paricular, agens would use he ineremporal echnology no jus for consumpion levels above he level ha yields he maximum lifeime uiliy, c h, bu also below i as long as θ h > ĉ h. Using his resul for he consumpion process θ h, π e ; ȳ, π m ; Y θ h, π e), we can now sae he main resul of his subsecion. Proposiion 2. Assume ha income akes hree values, parial insurance occurs, and y h is sufficienly close o c h. Then, he Euler consrain binds a he consrainedefficien soluion of he basic model, even when he ineremporal echnology yields no ineres. Proof. Parial insurance occurs if y h > c h and U au s h ) > uȳ)/1 β). This follows from Krueger and Perri 2006), whose resuls for he wosaes case are easy o generalize o hree saes. For y h > c h close o c h, c h < c h is in a small neighborhood of c h, and consumpion in sae s m is in a small neighborhood of ȳ. The resul follows from Lemma 2 by coninuiy. I is naural ha, if for some high consumpion level agens would deviae from he consrainedefficien allocaion by using he pure sorage echnology, hen his happens when he soluion is close o auarky, i.e. when saeconingen insurance ransfers are small, and agens bear a lo of consumpion risk. This resul concerning pure sorage is ineresing because i is hard o exclude ha such a echnology is available o agens in several economic conexs ha he risk sharing wih limied commimen model has been applied o. For example, hink of households in poor villages or members of a household who can hide grain or cash. 3.2 Sorage wih any reurn In his secion we firs consider he benchmark case where agens have access o an efficien ineremporal echnology, i.e. sorage earns a reurn r such ha β1+r) = 1. Aferwards, we sudy he general case. As above, we only examine wheher agens would use he available hidden ineremporal echnology a he consrainedefficien soluion of he basic model. We do no make any assumpion abou he number of income saes, excep ha income may ake a finie number of values, and he suppor of he income disribuion is bounded. 17
18 Lemma 3. Suppose ha parial insurance occurs and he hidden sorage echnology yields a reurn r such ha β1 + r) = 1. Then he Euler consrain is violaed a he consrainedefficien allocaion when an agen receives he highes possible income, y N. Proof. If parial insurance occurs, as opposed o full insurance, hen i mus be ha here exiss some sae s j where he agen consumes c j < c N. Then, u c N ) < Prs j )u c j ), s j ha is, he Euler consrain is violaed. Proposiion 3. There exiss r < 1/β 1 such ha for all r > r, agens Euler consrains are violaed a he consrainedefficien allocaion of he basic model. Proof. r is defined as he soluion o u c N ) = β1 + r) Prs j )u c j ). 13) s j For r close o 1, he righ hand side is close o zero. By Lemma 3, he righ hand side is greaer han he lef hand side if r = 1 1. I is obvious ha he righ hand side is increasing β in r. Therefore, here is a unique r solving equaion 13), and agens Euler consrain is violaed for higher values of r. Having esablished ha Euler consrains bind for a sufficienly high r, where high can mean r = 0, in he nex secion we urn o he general problem o find he consrainedefficien risk sharing conrac saisfying boh paricipaion and Euler consrains. 4 The model wih sorage In his secion, we provide he formulaion and analyical characerizaion of our model wih limied commimen and hidden sorage. We add agens Euler consrains o he problem given by he objecive funcion 1) and he consrains 2) and 3). We also modify he resource consrain o allow he social planner o use he same ineremporal echnology as he agens. We mainain he assumpion of no aggregae uncerainy o exclude he precauionary moive for saving a he aggregae level, and o hus isolae he saving incenive in limied commimen models due o endogenously incomplee markes. 18
19 The social planner s problem is P1 ) max {c i s ),Bs )} s.. 2 i=1 λ i =1 s 2 c ) i s i=1 r= s r β Pr ) s u c )) i s 14) 2 y i s ) r)b s 1) B s ), s, 15) i=1 β r Pr s r s ) u c i s r )) Ũ i au s ), s, i, 16) u c i s )) β1 + r) s +1 Pr s +1 s ) u c i s +1 )), s, i, 17) B s ) 0, s. 18) The social planner chooses he consumpion of each agen given any possible hisory of income saes, c i s ), i, and curren gross sorage given any possible hisory of income saes, B s ), and maximizes a weighed sum of agens lifeime uiliies. The firs consrain, 15), is he resource consrain, where B s 1 ) denoes asses inheried from he previous period. The nex consrain, 16), is he paricipaion consrain, where Ũ i au s ) is he value funcion of auarky when sorage is allowed. Equaion 17) is agens Euler consrain. Finally, 18) is he planner s borrowing consrain. A few remarks are in order abou his srucure before we urn o he characerizaion of consrainedefficien allocaions. Firs, agens can sore in auarky, bu hey lose access o he benefis of he public asse. 8 This implies ha Ũ i au defined as Vi au s j, b ) = max b { uy i s j ) r)b b ) + β s j ) = V au i N k=1 s j, 0), where Vi au s j, b) is π k Vi au s k, b )}, 19) where b denoes privae savings. Since V au i s j, 0) is increasing decreasing) in j for agen 1 2), i is obvious ha if we replace for he auarky value in he basic model inroduced in Secion 2 wih he one defined here, he same characerizaion holds, given ha a soluion exiss. Second, we allow for public sorage exacly in order o assure ha a soluion exiss. In oher words, his assumpion makes sure ha he feasible se is nonempy. If neiher he social planner nor he agens can sore in he opimal conrac, bu agens can and would sore in auarky, hen no feasible soluion exiss for sufficienly low βs, i.e. when he soluion 8 This is he same assumpion as in Krueger and Perri 2006), where agens lose access o he benefis of a ree afer defauling. 19
20 of he basic model is close o auarky. Noe, however, ha since he reurn on public and privae sorage is he same, public sorage can replicae any allocaion which agens can achieve using privae sorage. Furher, equaion 19) implicily assumes ha public sorage does no affec he value of auarky. As menioned above, when agens defaul hey are no only excluded from fuure risk sharing bu also from he benefis of he public asse. This implies ha public sorage has an addiional benefi: i makes defaul a relaively less aracive opion. Las bu no leas, public sorage is relevan for applicaions as well. One example is he exising communiy grain sorage faciliies in lowincome villages. Anoher example is he European Financial Sabiliy Faciliy and he European Sabiliy Mechanism o be launched), which can faciliae risk sharing across counries wihin he euro area. If a counry lef he euro area, i would lose access o hese resources. Third, we use a version of he firsorder condiion approach FOCA) here. Tha is, we only check single deviaions. In paricular, we check wheher he agen is beer off saying in he risk arrangemen or defauling given ha he does no sore condiion 16)), and we check wheher he is happy wih no soring given ha he does no defaul condiion 17)). I is no obvious wheher hese condiions are sufficien. 9 In principle, i is possible ha he agen sores in he curren period o increase his value of auarky in fuure periods, and defauls in a laer period. Our consrains do no ake such deviaions ino accoun. For now his is an assumpion. Given his assumpion, we will characerize he soluion. Aferwards, we will show ha agens indeed have no incenive o use hese more complex deviaions in Secion 4.2. Fourh, boh he paricipaion consrains 16) and he Euler consrains 17) involve fuure decision variables. Given hese wo ypes of forwardlooking consrains, a recursive formulaion using eiher he promised uiliies approach Abreu, Pearce, and Sacchei, 1990) or he Lagrange mulipliers approach Marce and Marimon, 2011) is difficul. Euler consrains have been deal wih in models wih moral hazard and hidden sorage using he agen s marginal uiliy as a cosae variable, see Werning 2001) and Ábrahám and Pavoni 2008). In our environmen, his could raise serious racabiliy issues, since we would need wo more coninuous cosae variables, in addiion o he sae variables o keep rack of individual asse holdings. In his paper, we follow a differen approach ha avoids hese complicaions. In paricular, we solve he problem ignoring agens Euler consrains firs. Then we verify ha he soluion of he simplified problem saisfies hose Euler consrains. Tha is, insead of Problem P1, 9 In fac, Kocherlakoa 2004) shows ha in an economy wih privae informaion and hidden sorage he firsorder condiion approach can be invalid. 20
21 we solve he following simpler problem: max {c i s ),Bs )} P2 ) s.. 2 i=1 λ i =1 s 2 c ) i s i=1 r= s r β Pr ) s u c )) i s 2 y i s ) r)b s 1) B s ), s, i=1 β r Pr s r s ) u c i s r )) Ũ i au s ), s, i, B s ) 0, s. Nex, we wrie Problem P2 in a recursive form. Le β Pr s ) µ i s ) denoe he Lagrange muliplier on he paricipaion consrain, 16), and le β Pr s ) γ s ) be he Lagrange muliplier on he resource consrain, 15), when hisory s has occurred, as in Secion 2. Then, he Lagrangian is L = β Pr ) { [ 2 s λ i u c )) 2 i s =1 s r= s r i=1 +µ ) i s β r Pr )] s r s ) u c i s r )) Ũ i au s ) +γ s ) 2 yi s ) c )) i s r)b s 1) B s ))} i=1 Similarly as for he basic model, we can rewrie he Lagrangian as L = β Pr ) { 2 [ s M ) i s u c )) i s µ ) ] i s Ũi au s ) =1 s i=1 +γ s ) 2 yi s ) c )) i s r)b s 1) B s ))}. i=1 where M i s ) = M i s 1 ) + µ i s ) and M i s 0 ) = λ i, as before. This Lagrangian is recursive wih curren income realizaions, inheried asses, and he relaive Pareo weigh from las period serving as sae variables, and he curren relaive Pareo weigh and sorage serving as conrols. 4.1 Characerizaion The firsorder condiion wih respec o agen i s consumpion when hisory s has occurred is i=1 L c i s ) = M ) i s u c )) i s γ s ) = 0. 20) 21
22 Combining such firsorder condiions for agen 1 and agen 2, and using he definiions of M i s ) and of x s ), we have x s ) = M 1 s ) M 2 s ) = u c 2 s )) u c 1 s )). 21) Remember ha υ i s ) = µ i s ) /M i s ). Then, he law of moion of x is as in he basic model. x s ) = xs 1 ) 1 υ 2 s ) 1 υ 1 s ), 22) The planner s Euler consrain, i.e. he opimaliy condiion for B s ) is γ s ) β1 + r) s +1 β Pr s +1 s ) γ s +1), 23) which, using 20), can also be wrien as M i s ) u c i s )) β1 + r) s +1 Pr s +1 s ) M i s +1 ) u c i s +1 )). Then, using 21) and 22), he planner s Euler becomes u c i s )) β1 + r) s +1 Pr s +1 s ) u c i s +1 )) 1 υ i s +1 ), 24) where 0 υ i s +1 ) 1. Given he definiion of υ i s +1 ) and equaion 22), i is easy o see ha 23) represens exacly he same mahemaical relaionship for boh agens. Comparing he planner s Euler, 24), o he sandard Euler consrains for he agens gives he following resul: Proposiion 4. When he planner s Euler is saisfied, he agens Eulers are saisfied as well. Therefore, he soluion of he model wih hidden sorage, P1, corresponds o he soluion of he simplified problem, P2. Proof. The planner s Euler is 24), while he agens Euler is u c i s )) β1 + r) s +1 Pr s +1 s ) u c i s +1 )). 25) The righ hand side of 24) is bigger han he righ hand side of 25), for i = {1, 2}, since 0 υ i s +1 ) 1, s +1. Therefore, 24) implies 25). Corollary 1. The planner sores in equilibrium whenever an agen s Euler consrain is violaed a he consrainedefficien allocaion of he basic model wih sorage in auarky. 22
23 Noe ha he public sorage echnology is used even hough here is no aggregae uncerainy and he echnology is inferior r < 1/β 1). Inuiively, his is opimal for wo inerrelaed reasons. Firs, given ha an agen would have an incenive o sore, he planner can eliminae i by public sorage. Noe ha when an agen has he highes level of consumpion, he planner s Euler is idenical o he agen s Euler. This is easy o see comparing 24) and 25). Hence, in his case, he only reason for public asse accumulaion is o sore for he highincome agen. This also implies ha his will be he only reason for using he available ineremporal echnology in he case wih a high level of risk sharing, i.e. where only wo consumpion levels occur in he long run. Second, sorage by he planner makes i easier o saisfy he paricipaion consrains nex period, hus i improves risk sharing in he fuure. This is he case whenever a paricipaion consrain binds in oher saes as well, no jus when income inequaliy is highes. Comparing 24) and 25) again, i is obvious ha he planner has more incenive o save han he agens in he oher saes. In paricular, he presence of 1/ 1 υ i s +1 ) 1 in he planner s Euler exacly indicaes how increasing asses helps he planner o relax fuure paricipaion consrains, and hereby improve fuure risk sharing. Given Proposiion 4, we can focus on solving problem P2, which will also give us he soluion of problem P1. Nex, we inroduce some useful noaion and show more precisely he recursive formulaion of P2, which we will use o solve he model numerically. Le y denoe he curren income of agen 1, and V ) denoe he value funcion. The following sysem is recursive using X = y, B, x) as sae variables: x X) = u Y r)b B X) c 1 X)) u c 1 X)) x X) = x 1 υ 2X) 1 υ 1 X) u c 1 X)) β1 + r) y Pr y ) u c 1 X )) 1 υ 1 X ) 26) 27) 28) u c 1 X)) + β y Pr y ) V X ) Ũ au y) 29) u Y r)b B X) c 1 X)) + β y Pr y ) V Y y, B, 1/x ) Ũ au Y y) 30) B X) 0. 31) The firs equaion, 26), says ha he raio of marginal uiliies beween he wo agens has o be equal o he curren relaive Pareo weigh, and where we have used he resource 23
24 consrain o subsiue for c 2 X). Equaion 27) is he law of moion of he cosae variable, x. Equaion 28) is he social planner s Euler consrain, which we have derived above. Equaions 29) and 30) are he paricipaion consrains of agen 1 and agen 2, respecively, where Ũ au y) = Ũ au 1 s j ) and Ũ au Y y) = Ũ au 2 s j ), wih y = y j = y 1 s j ). Finally, equaion 31) is he planner s borrowing consrain. Given he recursive formulaion above, and noing ha he ouside opions Ũ au y) and Ũ au Y y) are monoone in y and ake a finie se of values, he soluion can be characerized by a se of saedependen inervals, as in he basic model. This is sraighforward in he for now hypoheical) case of consan and posiive level of public savings, B > 0. In his case, we can repea he same analysis as in Secion 2 wih only wo differences: i) he auarky value is Ũ i au ) insead of Ui au ), and ii) aggregae consumpion is given by Y + rb insead of Y. This implies ha he same updaing rule applies as in he basic model, see 7). In he case where public asses are no consan, he consumpion inervals naurally become a funcion of he changing level of available aggregae resources, Y r)b. Neverheless, opimal saedependen inervals on he relaive Pareo weigh sill characerize he soluion, bu hey depend on B as well, no jus on curren income realizaions. To see his, noe ha we can express he value funcion in erms of he end of he period relaive Pareo weigh and he inheried asse level only. This is wihou loss of generaliy because of equaion 27). I follows ha he following condiions define he lower and upper bound of hese inervals: V y j, x j B), B) = Ũ au y j) and V ) Y y j 1, x j B), B = Ũ au Y y j). Hence, given he inheried Pareo weigh, x 1, and accumulaed asses, B, he updaing rule 7) needs o be modified as follows: x j B) if x 1 > x j B) x = x 1 if x 1 [ x j B), x j B) ] x j B) if x 1 < x j B). 32) Since his updaing rule is pracically he same as he one for he basic model compare 7) and 32)), we can deermine he level of risk sharing in his model as well, given B, by checking how much hese inervals overlap. Despie he fac ha he ransiion rules are remarkably similar o he benchmark case, here is a very imporan difference: as he aggregae sorage level changes, hese inervals also change over ime, which implies ha we do no necessary say a he limis of he opimal inervals even in he long run. To see his, noice ha whenever B > B, he relaive araciveness of auarky is reduced, hence 24
Optimal Investment and Consumption Decision of Family with Life Insurance
Opimal Invesmen and Consumpion Decision of Family wih Life Insurance Minsuk Kwak 1 2 Yong Hyun Shin 3 U Jin Choi 4 6h World Congress of he Bachelier Finance Sociey Torono, Canada June 25, 2010 1 Speaker
More informationThe Transport Equation
The Transpor Equaion Consider a fluid, flowing wih velociy, V, in a hin sraigh ube whose cross secion will be denoed by A. Suppose he fluid conains a conaminan whose concenraion a posiion a ime will be
More informationStochastic Optimal Control Problem for Life Insurance
Sochasic Opimal Conrol Problem for Life Insurance s. Basukh 1, D. Nyamsuren 2 1 Deparmen of Economics and Economerics, Insiue of Finance and Economics, Ulaanbaaar, Mongolia 2 School of Mahemaics, Mongolian
More informationGraduate Macro Theory II: Notes on Neoclassical Growth Model
Graduae Macro Theory II: Noes on Neoclassical Growh Model Eric Sims Universiy of Nore Dame Spring 2011 1 Basic Neoclassical Growh Model The economy is populaed by a large number of infiniely lived agens.
More informationPROFIT TEST MODELLING IN LIFE ASSURANCE USING SPREADSHEETS PART ONE
Profi Tes Modelling in Life Assurance Using Spreadshees PROFIT TEST MODELLING IN LIFE ASSURANCE USING SPREADSHEETS PART ONE Erik Alm Peer Millingon 2004 Profi Tes Modelling in Life Assurance Using Spreadshees
More informationDuration and Convexity ( ) 20 = Bond B has a maturity of 5 years and also has a required rate of return of 10%. Its price is $613.
Graduae School of Business Adminisraion Universiy of Virginia UVAF38 Duraion and Convexiy he price of a bond is a funcion of he promised paymens and he marke required rae of reurn. Since he promised
More informationA OneSector Neoclassical Growth Model with Endogenous Retirement. By Kiminori Matsuyama. Final Manuscript. Abstract
A OneSecor Neoclassical Growh Model wih Endogenous Reiremen By Kiminori Masuyama Final Manuscrip Absrac This paper exends Diamond s OG model by allowing he agens o make he reiremen decision. Earning a
More informationRandom Walk in 1D. 3 possible paths x vs n. 5 For our random walk, we assume the probabilities p,q do not depend on time (n)  stationary
Random Walk in D Random walks appear in many cones: diffusion is a random walk process undersanding buffering, waiing imes, queuing more generally he heory of sochasic processes gambling choosing he bes
More informationNiche Market or Mass Market?
Niche Marke or Mass Marke? Maxim Ivanov y McMaser Universiy July 2009 Absrac The de niion of a niche or a mass marke is based on he ranking of wo variables: he monopoly price and he produc mean value.
More informationANALYSIS AND COMPARISONS OF SOME SOLUTION CONCEPTS FOR STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS
ANALYSIS AND COMPARISONS OF SOME SOLUTION CONCEPTS FOR STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS R. Caballero, E. Cerdá, M. M. Muñoz and L. Rey () Deparmen of Applied Economics (Mahemaics), Universiy of Málaga,
More informationOption PutCall Parity Relations When the Underlying Security Pays Dividends
Inernaional Journal of Business and conomics, 26, Vol. 5, No. 3, 22523 Opion Puall Pariy Relaions When he Underlying Securiy Pays Dividends Weiyu Guo Deparmen of Finance, Universiy of Nebraska Omaha,
More informationDYNAMIC MODELS FOR VALUATION OF WRONGFUL DEATH PAYMENTS
DYNAMIC MODELS FOR VALUATION OF WRONGFUL DEATH PAYMENTS Hong Mao, Shanghai Second Polyechnic Universiy Krzyszof M. Osaszewski, Illinois Sae Universiy Youyu Zhang, Fudan Universiy ABSTRACT Liigaion, exper
More informationChapter 7. Response of FirstOrder RL and RC Circuits
Chaper 7. esponse of FirsOrder L and C Circuis 7.1. The Naural esponse of an L Circui 7.2. The Naural esponse of an C Circui 7.3. The ep esponse of L and C Circuis 7.4. A General oluion for ep and Naural
More informationEconomics Honors Exam 2008 Solutions Question 5
Economics Honors Exam 2008 Soluions Quesion 5 (a) (2 poins) Oupu can be decomposed as Y = C + I + G. And we can solve for i by subsiuing in equaions given in he quesion, Y = C + I + G = c 0 + c Y D + I
More informationOptimal Stock Selling/Buying Strategy with reference to the Ultimate Average
Opimal Sock Selling/Buying Sraegy wih reference o he Ulimae Average Min Dai Dep of Mah, Naional Universiy of Singapore, Singapore Yifei Zhong Dep of Mah, Naional Universiy of Singapore, Singapore July
More informationWorking Paper No. 482. Net Intergenerational Transfers from an Increase in Social Security Benefits
Working Paper No. 482 Ne Inergeneraional Transfers from an Increase in Social Securiy Benefis By Li Gan Texas A&M and NBER Guan Gong Shanghai Universiy of Finance and Economics Michael Hurd RAND Corporaion
More informationAnalysis of Pricing and Efficiency Control Strategy between Internet Retailer and Conventional Retailer
Recen Advances in Business Managemen and Markeing Analysis of Pricing and Efficiency Conrol Sraegy beween Inerne Reailer and Convenional Reailer HYUG RAE CHO 1, SUG MOO BAE and JOG HU PARK 3 Deparmen of
More informationMTH6121 Introduction to Mathematical Finance Lesson 5
26 MTH6121 Inroducion o Mahemaical Finance Lesson 5 Conens 2.3 Brownian moion wih drif........................... 27 2.4 Geomeric Brownian moion........................... 28 2.5 Convergence of random
More informationIndividual Health Insurance April 30, 2008 Pages 167170
Individual Healh Insurance April 30, 2008 Pages 167170 We have received feedback ha his secion of he e is confusing because some of he defined noaion is inconsisen wih comparable life insurance reserve
More informationPresent Value Methodology
Presen Value Mehodology Econ 422 Invesmen, Capial & Finance Universiy of Washingon Eric Zivo Las updaed: April 11, 2010 Presen Value Concep Wealh in Fisher Model: W = Y 0 + Y 1 /(1+r) The consumer/producer
More informationJournal Of Business & Economics Research September 2005 Volume 3, Number 9
Opion Pricing And Mone Carlo Simulaions George M. Jabbour, (Email: jabbour@gwu.edu), George Washingon Universiy YiKang Liu, (yikang@gwu.edu), George Washingon Universiy ABSTRACT The advanage of Mone Carlo
More informationMorningstar Investor Return
Morningsar Invesor Reurn Morningsar Mehodology Paper Augus 31, 2010 2010 Morningsar, Inc. All righs reserved. The informaion in his documen is he propery of Morningsar, Inc. Reproducion or ranscripion
More informationThe Greek financial crisis: growing imbalances and sovereign spreads. Heather D. Gibson, Stephan G. Hall and George S. Tavlas
The Greek financial crisis: growing imbalances and sovereign spreads Heaher D. Gibson, Sephan G. Hall and George S. Tavlas The enry The enry of Greece ino he Eurozone in 2001 produced a dividend in he
More informationWhy Did the Demand for Cash Decrease Recently in Korea?
Why Did he Demand for Cash Decrease Recenly in Korea? Byoung Hark Yoo Bank of Korea 26. 5 Absrac We explores why cash demand have decreased recenly in Korea. The raio of cash o consumpion fell o 4.7% in
More information17 Laplace transform. Solving linear ODE with piecewise continuous right hand sides
7 Laplace ransform. Solving linear ODE wih piecewise coninuous righ hand sides In his lecure I will show how o apply he Laplace ransform o he ODE Ly = f wih piecewise coninuous f. Definiion. A funcion
More information11/6/2013. Chapter 14: Dynamic ADAS. Introduction. Introduction. Keeping track of time. The model s elements
Inroducion Chaper 14: Dynamic DS dynamic model of aggregae and aggregae supply gives us more insigh ino how he economy works in he shor run. I is a simplified version of a DSGE model, used in cuingedge
More informationThe Application of Multi Shifts and Break Windows in Employees Scheduling
The Applicaion of Muli Shifs and Brea Windows in Employees Scheduling Evy Herowai Indusrial Engineering Deparmen, Universiy of Surabaya, Indonesia Absrac. One mehod for increasing company s performance
More informationTHE FIRM'S INVESTMENT DECISION UNDER CERTAINTY: CAPITAL BUDGETING AND RANKING OF NEW INVESTMENT PROJECTS
VII. THE FIRM'S INVESTMENT DECISION UNDER CERTAINTY: CAPITAL BUDGETING AND RANKING OF NEW INVESTMENT PROJECTS The mos imporan decisions for a firm's managemen are is invesmen decisions. While i is surely
More informationSinglemachine Scheduling with Periodic Maintenance and both Preemptive and. Nonpreemptive jobs in Remanufacturing System 1
Absrac number: 050407 Singlemachine Scheduling wih Periodic Mainenance and boh Preempive and Nonpreempive jobs in Remanufacuring Sysem Liu Biyu hen Weida (School of Economics and Managemen Souheas Universiy
More informationChapter 8: Regression with Lagged Explanatory Variables
Chaper 8: Regression wih Lagged Explanaory Variables Time series daa: Y for =1,..,T End goal: Regression model relaing a dependen variable o explanaory variables. Wih ime series new issues arise: 1. One
More informationChapter 10 Social Security 1
Chaper 0 Social Securiy 0. Inroducion A ypical social securiy sysem provides income during periods of unemploymen, illhealh or disabiliy, and financial suppor, in he form of pensions, o he reired. Alhough
More informationHedging with Forwards and Futures
Hedging wih orwards and uures Hedging in mos cases is sraighforward. You plan o buy 10,000 barrels of oil in six monhs and you wish o eliminae he price risk. If you ake he buyside of a forward/fuures
More informationCHARGE AND DISCHARGE OF A CAPACITOR
REFERENCES RC Circuis: Elecrical Insrumens: Mos Inroducory Physics exs (e.g. A. Halliday and Resnick, Physics ; M. Sernheim and J. Kane, General Physics.) This Laboraory Manual: Commonly Used Insrumens:
More informationARCH 2013.1 Proceedings
Aricle from: ARCH 213.1 Proceedings Augus 14, 212 Ghislain Leveille, Emmanuel Hamel A renewal model for medical malpracice Ghislain Léveillé École d acuaria Universié Laval, Québec, Canada 47h ARC Conference
More informationCooperation with Network Monitoring
Cooperaion wih Nework Monioring Alexander Wolizky Microsof Research and Sanford Universiy November 2011 Absrac This paper sudies he maximum level of cooperaion ha can be susained in perfec Bayesian equilibrium
More informationForecasting and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Under QuasiARMA Demand
Forecasing and Informaion Sharing in Supply Chains Under QuasiARMA Demand Avi Giloni, Clifford Hurvich, Sridhar Seshadri July 9, 2009 Absrac In his paper, we revisi he problem of demand propagaion in
More informationABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Markov chain, Regulation of payments, Linear regulator, Bellman equations, Constraints. 1. INTRODUCTION
QUADRATIC OPTIMIZATION OF LIFE AND PENSION INSURANCE PAYMENTS BY MOGENS STEFFENSEN ABSTRACT Quadraic opimizaion is he classical approach o opimal conrol of pension funds. Usually he paymen sream is approximaed
More informationCooperation with Network Monitoring
Cooperaion wih Nework Monioring Alexander Wolizky Microsof Research and Sanford Universiy February 2012 Absrac This paper sudies he maximum level of cooperaion ha can be susained in perfec Bayesian equilibrium
More informationPrice Controls and Banking in Emissions Trading: An Experimental Evaluation
This version: March 2014 Price Conrols and Banking in Emissions Trading: An Experimenal Evaluaion John K. Sranlund Deparmen of Resource Economics Universiy of MassachusesAmhers James J. Murphy Deparmen
More informationMeasuring macroeconomic volatility Applications to export revenue data, 19702005
FONDATION POUR LES ETUDES ET RERS LE DEVELOPPEMENT INTERNATIONAL Measuring macroeconomic volailiy Applicaions o expor revenue daa, 1970005 by Joël Cariolle Policy brief no. 47 March 01 The FERDI is a
More informationChapter 1.6 Financial Management
Chaper 1.6 Financial Managemen Par I: Objecive ype quesions and answers 1. Simple pay back period is equal o: a) Raio of Firs cos/ne yearly savings b) Raio of Annual gross cash flow/capial cos n c) = (1
More information4. International Parity Conditions
4. Inernaional ariy ondiions 4.1 urchasing ower ariy he urchasing ower ariy ( heory is one of he early heories of exchange rae deerminaion. his heory is based on he concep ha he demand for a counry's currency
More informationA Note on Using the Svensson procedure to estimate the risk free rate in corporate valuation
A Noe on Using he Svensson procedure o esimae he risk free rae in corporae valuaion By Sven Arnold, Alexander Lahmann and Bernhard Schwezler Ocober 2011 1. The risk free ineres rae in corporae valuaion
More informationPricing FixedIncome Derivaives wih he ForwardRisk Adjused Measure Jesper Lund Deparmen of Finance he Aarhus School of Business DK8 Aarhus V, Denmark Email: jel@hha.dk Homepage: www.hha.dk/~jel/ Firs
More informationTerm Structure of Prices of Asian Options
Term Srucure of Prices of Asian Opions Jirô Akahori, Tsuomu Mikami, Kenji Yasuomi and Teruo Yokoa Dep. of Mahemaical Sciences, Risumeikan Universiy 111 Nojihigashi, Kusasu, Shiga 5258577, Japan Email:
More informationPATHWISE PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE BOUNDS FOR A PERISHABLE INVENTORY SYSTEM
PATHWISE PROPERTIES AND PERFORMANCE BOUNDS FOR A PERISHABLE INVENTORY SYSTEM WILLIAM L. COOPER Deparmen of Mechanical Engineering, Universiy of Minnesoa, 111 Church Sree S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455 billcoop@me.umn.edu
More informationPrice elasticity of demand for crude oil: estimates for 23 countries
Price elasiciy of demand for crude oil: esimaes for 23 counries John C.B. Cooper Absrac This paper uses a muliple regression model derived from an adapaion of Nerlove s parial adjusmen model o esimae boh
More informationLongevity 11 Lyon 79 September 2015
Longeviy 11 Lyon 79 Sepember 2015 RISK SHARING IN LIFE INSURANCE AND PENSIONS wihin and across generaions Ragnar Norberg ISFA Universié Lyon 1/London School of Economics Email: ragnar.norberg@univlyon1.fr
More informationLEASING VERSUSBUYING
LEASNG VERSUSBUYNG Conribued by James D. Blum and LeRoy D. Brooks Assisan Professors of Business Adminisraion Deparmen of Business Adminisraion Universiy of Delaware Newark, Delaware The auhors discuss
More informationTEMPORAL PATTERN IDENTIFICATION OF TIME SERIES DATA USING PATTERN WAVELETS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS
TEMPORAL PATTERN IDENTIFICATION OF TIME SERIES DATA USING PATTERN WAVELETS AND GENETIC ALGORITHMS RICHARD J. POVINELLI AND XIN FENG Deparmen of Elecrical and Compuer Engineering Marquee Universiy, P.O.
More informationMarkov Chain Modeling of Policy Holder Behavior in Life Insurance and Pension
Markov Chain Modeling of Policy Holder Behavior in Life Insurance and Pension Lars Frederik Brand Henriksen 1, Jeppe Woemann Nielsen 2, Mogens Seffensen 1, and Chrisian Svensson 2 1 Deparmen of Mahemaical
More informationUSE OF EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY IN ENGLISH CLASSES
USE OF EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY IN ENGLISH CLASSES Mehme Nuri GÖMLEKSİZ Absrac Using educaion echnology in classes helps eachers realize a beer and more effecive learning. In his sudy 150 English eachers were
More informationOptimal Monetary Policy When LumpSum Taxes Are Unavailable: A Reconsideration of the Outcomes Under Commitment and Discretion*
Opimal Moneary Policy When LumpSum Taxes Are Unavailable: A Reconsideraion of he Oucomes Under Commimen and Discreion* Marin Ellison Dep of Economics Universiy of Warwick Covenry CV4 7AL UK m.ellison@warwick.ac.uk
More informationSupplementary Appendix for Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect RiskTaking?
Supplemenary Appendix for Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affec RiskTaking? Ulrike Malmendier UC Berkeley and NBER Sefan Nagel Sanford Universiy and NBER Sepember 2009 A. Deails on SCF
More informationRisk Modelling of Collateralised Lending
Risk Modelling of Collaeralised Lending Dae: 4112008 Number: 8/18 Inroducion This noe explains how i is possible o handle collaeralised lending wihin Risk Conroller. The approach draws on he faciliies
More informationII.1. Debt reduction and fiscal multipliers. dbt da dpbal da dg. bal
Quarerly Repor on he Euro Area 3/202 II.. Deb reducion and fiscal mulipliers The deerioraion of public finances in he firs years of he crisis has led mos Member Saes o adop sizeable consolidaion packages.
More informationThe Real Business Cycle paradigm. The RBC model emphasizes supply (technology) disturbances as the main source of
Prof. Harris Dellas Advanced Macroeconomics Winer 2001/01 The Real Business Cycle paradigm The RBC model emphasizes supply (echnology) disurbances as he main source of macroeconomic flucuaions in a world
More informationWorking Paper On the timing option in a futures contract. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 619
econsor www.econsor.eu Der OpenAccessPublikaionsserver der ZBW LeibnizInformaionszenrum Wirschaf The Open Access Publicaion Server of he ZBW Leibniz Informaion Cenre for Economics Biagini, Francesca;
More informationLECTURE: SOCIAL SECURITY HILARY HOYNES UC DAVIS EC230 OUTLINE OF LECTURE:
LECTURE: SOCIAL SECURITY HILARY HOYNES UC DAVIS EC230 OUTLINE OF LECTURE: 1. Inroducion and definiions 2. Insiuional Deails in Social Securiy 3. Social Securiy and Redisribuion 4. Jusificaion for Governmen
More informationBALANCE OF PAYMENTS. First quarter 2008. Balance of payments
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS DATE: 20080530 PUBLISHER: Balance of Paymens and Financial Markes (BFM) Lena Finn + 46 8 506 944 09, lena.finn@scb.se Camilla Bergeling +46 8 506 942 06, camilla.bergeling@scb.se
More informationInductance and Transient Circuits
Chaper H Inducance and Transien Circuis Blinn College  Physics 2426  Terry Honan As a consequence of Faraday's law a changing curren hrough one coil induces an EMF in anoher coil; his is known as muual
More informationMultiprocessor SystemsonChips
Par of: Muliprocessor SysemsonChips Edied by: Ahmed Amine Jerraya and Wayne Wolf Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2005 2 Modeling Shared Resources Conex swiching implies overhead. On a processing elemen,
More informationOn the degrees of irreducible factors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials
ACTA ARITHMETICA LXII.4 (1992 On he degrees of irreducible facors of higher order Bernoulli polynomials by Arnold Adelberg (Grinnell, Ia. 1. Inroducion. In his paper, we generalize he curren resuls on
More informationThe Interaction of Guarantees, Surplus Distribution, and Asset Allocation in With Profit Life Insurance Policies
1 The Ineracion of Guaranees, Surplus Disribuion, and Asse Allocaion in Wih Profi Life Insurance Policies Alexander Kling * Insiu für Finanz und Akuarwissenschafen, Helmholzsr. 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany
More informationAnalysis of Tailored BaseSurge Policies in Dual Sourcing Inventory Systems
Analysis of Tailored BaseSurge Policies in Dual Sourcing Invenory Sysems Ganesh Janakiraman, 1 Sridhar Seshadri, 2, Anshul Sheopuri. 3 Absrac We sudy a model of a firm managing is invenory of a single
More informationNetwork Effects, Pricing Strategies, and Optimal Upgrade Time in Software Provision.
Nework Effecs, Pricing Sraegies, and Opimal Upgrade Time in Sofware Provision. YiNung Yang* Deparmen of Economics Uah Sae Universiy Logan, UT 84322353 April 3, 995 (curren version Feb, 996) JEL codes:
More informationA general decomposition formula for derivative prices in stochastic volatility models
A general decomposiion formula for derivaive prices in sochasic volailiy models Elisa Alòs Universia Pompeu Fabra C/ Ramón rias Fargas, 57 85 Barcelona Absrac We see ha he price of an european call opion
More informationTable of contents Chapter 1 Interest rates and factors Chapter 2 Level annuities Chapter 3 Varying annuities
Table of conens Chaper 1 Ineres raes and facors 1 1.1 Ineres 2 1.2 Simple ineres 4 1.3 Compound ineres 6 1.4 Accumulaed value 10 1.5 Presen value 11 1.6 Rae of discoun 13 1.7 Consan force of ineres 17
More informationUNDERSTANDING THE DEATH BENEFIT SWITCH OPTION IN UNIVERSAL LIFE POLICIES. Nadine Gatzert
UNDERSTANDING THE DEATH BENEFIT SWITCH OPTION IN UNIVERSAL LIFE POLICIES Nadine Gazer Conac (has changed since iniial submission): Chair for Insurance Managemen Universiy of ErlangenNuremberg Lange Gasse
More informationOptimalCompensationwithHiddenAction and LumpSum Payment in a ContinuousTime Model
Appl Mah Opim (9) 59: 99 46 DOI.7/s45895 OpimalCompensaionwihHiddenAcion and LumpSum Paymen in a ConinuousTime Model Jakša Cvianić Xuhu Wan Jianfeng Zhang Published online: 6 June 8 Springer Science+Business
More informationTrading on ShortTerm Information
428 Trading on ShorTerm Informaion by ALEXANDER GÜMBEL This paper shows ha invesors may wan fund managers o acquire and rade on shorerm insead of more profiable longerm informaion. This improves learning
More informationON THE PRICING OF EQUITYLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS IN GAUSSIAN FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT
Teor Imov r.amaem.sais. Theor. Probabiliy and Mah. Sais. Vip. 7, 24 No. 7, 25, Pages 15 111 S 949(5)6344 Aricle elecronically published on Augus 12, 25 ON THE PRICING OF EQUITYLINKED LIFE INSURANCE
More informationI. Basic Concepts (Ch. 14)
(Ch. 14) A. Real vs. Financial Asses (Ch 1.2) Real asses (buildings, machinery, ec.) appear on he asse side of he balance shee. Financial asses (bonds, socks) appear on boh sides of he balance shee. Creaing
More informationMathematics in Pharmacokinetics What and Why (A second attempt to make it clearer)
Mahemaics in Pharmacokineics Wha and Why (A second aemp o make i clearer) We have used equaions for concenraion () as a funcion of ime (). We will coninue o use hese equaions since he plasma concenraions
More informationDOES TRADING VOLUME INFLUENCE GARCH EFFECTS? SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE GREEK MARKET WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BANKING SECTOR
Invesmen Managemen and Financial Innovaions, Volume 4, Issue 3, 7 33 DOES TRADING VOLUME INFLUENCE GARCH EFFECTS? SOME EVIDENCE FROM THE GREEK MARKET WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BANKING SECTOR Ahanasios
More informationDebt management and optimal fiscal policy with long bonds 1
Deb managemen and opimal fiscal policy wih long bonds Elisa Faraglia 2 Alber Marce 3 and Andrew Sco 4 Absrac We sudy Ramsey opimal fiscal policy under incomplee markes in he case where he governmen issues
More informationAppendix D Flexibility Factor/Margin of Choice Desktop Research
Appendix D Flexibiliy Facor/Margin of Choice Deskop Research Cheshire Eas Council Cheshire Eas Employmen Land Review Conens D1 Flexibiliy Facor/Margin of Choice Deskop Research 2 Final Ocober 2012 \\GLOBAL.ARUP.COM\EUROPE\MANCHESTER\JOBS\200000\22348900\4
More informationChabot College Physics Lab RC Circuits Scott Hildreth
Chabo College Physics Lab Circuis Sco Hildreh Goals: Coninue o advance your undersanding of circuis, measuring resisances, currens, and volages across muliple componens. Exend your skills in making breadboard
More informationThe Impact of Surplus Distribution on the Risk Exposure of With Profit Life Insurance Policies Including Interest Rate Guarantees.
The Impac of Surplus Disribuion on he Risk Exposure of Wih Profi Life Insurance Policies Including Ineres Rae Guaranees Alexander Kling 1 Insiu für Finanz und Akuarwissenschafen, Helmholzsraße 22, 89081
More informationTask is a schedulable entity, i.e., a thread
RealTime Scheduling Sysem Model Task is a schedulable eniy, i.e., a hread Time consrains of periodic ask T:  s: saring poin  e: processing ime of T  d: deadline of T  p: period of T Periodic ask T
More informationWorking Paper Social security systems, human capital, and growth in a small open economy
econsor www.econsor.eu Der OpenAccessPublikaionsserver der ZBW LeibnizInformaionszenrum Wirschaf The Open Access Publicaion Server of he ZBW Leibniz Informaion Cenre for Economics Kaganovich, Michael;
More informationDETERMINISTIC INVENTORY MODEL FOR ITEMS WITH TIME VARYING DEMAND, WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION DETERIORATION AND SHORTAGES KUNSHAN WU
Yugoslav Journal of Operaions Research 2 (22), Number, 67 DEERMINISIC INVENORY MODEL FOR IEMS WIH IME VARYING DEMAND, WEIBULL DISRIBUION DEERIORAION AND SHORAGES KUNSHAN WU Deparmen of Bussines Adminisraion
More informationThe Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
WEALTH ADVISORY Esae Planning Sraegies for closelyheld, family businesses The Granor Reained Annuiy Trus (GRAT) An efficien wealh ransfer sraegy, paricularly in a low ineres rae environmen Family business
More informationUnemployment Insurance Fraud and Optimal Monitoring
Unemploymen Insurance Fraud and Opimal Monioring David L. Fuller, B. Ravikumar, and Yuzhe Zhang June 2014 Absrac An imporan incenive problem for he design of unemploymen insurance is he fraudulen collecion
More informationOptimal Life Insurance Purchase, Consumption and Investment
Opimal Life Insurance Purchase, Consumpion and Invesmen Jinchun Ye a, Sanley R. Pliska b, a Dep. of Mahemaics, Saisics and Compuer Science, Universiy of Illinois a Chicago, Chicago, IL 667, USA b Dep.
More informationThe Impact of Surplus Distribution on the Risk Exposure of With Profit Life Insurance Policies Including Interest Rate Guarantees
1 The Impac of Surplus Disribuion on he Risk Exposure of Wih Profi Life Insurance Policies Including Ineres Rae Guaranees Alexander Kling Insiu für Finanz und Akuarwissenschafen, Helmholzsraße 22, 89081
More informationUsefulness of the Forward Curve in Forecasting Oil Prices
Usefulness of he Forward Curve in Forecasing Oil Prices Akira Yanagisawa Leader Energy Demand, Supply and Forecas Analysis Group The Energy Daa and Modelling Cener Summary When people analyse oil prices,
More informationDynamic Contracting: An Irrelevance Result
Dynamic Conracing: An Irrelevance Resul Péer Eső and Balázs Szenes Sepember 5, 2013 Absrac his paper considers a general, dynamic conracing problem wih adverse selecion and moral hazard, in which he agen
More informationOptimal Consumption and Insurance: A ContinuousTime Markov Chain Approach
Opimal Consumpion and Insurance: A ConinuousTime Markov Chain Approach Holger Kraf and Mogens Seffensen Absrac Personal financial decision making plays an imporan role in modern finance. Decision problems
More informationTowards Optimal Capacity Segmentation with Hybrid Cloud Pricing
Towards Opimal Capaciy Segmenaion wih Hybrid Cloud Pricing Wei Wang, Baochun Li, and Ben Liang Deparmen of Elecrical and Compuer Engineering Universiy of Torono Absrac Cloud resources are usually priced
More informationResearch on Inventory Sharing and Pricing Strategy of Multichannel Retailer with Channel Preference in Internet Environment
Vol. 7, No. 6 (04), pp. 365374 hp://dx.doi.org/0.457/ijhi.04.7.6.3 Research on Invenory Sharing and Pricing Sraegy of Mulichannel Reailer wih Channel Preference in Inerne Environmen Hanzong Li College
More informationINSTRUMENTS OF MONETARY POLICY*
Aricles INSTRUMENTS OF MONETARY POLICY* Bernardino Adão** Isabel Correia** Pedro Teles**. INTRODUCTION A classic quesion in moneary economics is wheher he ineres rae or he money supply is he beer insrumen
More informationDistributing Human Resources among Software Development Projects 1
Disribuing Human Resources among Sofware Developmen Proecs Macario Polo, María Dolores Maeos, Mario Piaini and rancisco Ruiz Summary This paper presens a mehod for esimaing he disribuion of human resources
More informationA Reexamination of the Joint Mortality Functions
Norh merican cuarial Journal Volume 6, Number 1, p.166170 (2002) Reeaminaion of he Join Morali Funcions bsrac. Heekung Youn, rkad Shemakin, Edwin Herman Universi of S. Thomas, Sain Paul, MN, US Morali
More informationINTEREST RATE FUTURES AND THEIR OPTIONS: SOME PRICING APPROACHES
INTEREST RATE FUTURES AND THEIR OPTIONS: SOME PRICING APPROACHES OPENGAMMA QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH Absrac. Exchangeraded ineres rae fuures and heir opions are described. The fuure opions include hose paying
More information1. y 5y + 6y = 2e t Solution: Characteristic equation is r 2 5r +6 = 0, therefore r 1 = 2, r 2 = 3, and y 1 (t) = e 2t,
Homework6 Soluions.7 In Problem hrough 4 use he mehod of variaion of parameers o find a paricular soluion of he given differenial equaion. Then check your answer by using he mehod of undeermined coeffiens..
More informationTime Consistency in Portfolio Management
1 Time Consisency in Porfolio Managemen Traian A Pirvu Deparmen of Mahemaics and Saisics McMaser Universiy Torono, June 2010 The alk is based on join work wih Ivar Ekeland Time Consisency in Porfolio Managemen
More informationLIFE INSURANCE WITH STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE. L. Noviyanti a, M. Syamsuddin b
LIFE ISURACE WITH STOCHASTIC ITEREST RATE L. oviyani a, M. Syamsuddin b a Deparmen of Saisics, Universias Padjadjaran, Bandung, Indonesia b Deparmen of Mahemaics, Insiu Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia Absrac.
More informationDoes Option Trading Have a Pervasive Impact on Underlying Stock Prices? *
Does Opion Trading Have a Pervasive Impac on Underlying Sock Prices? * Neil D. Pearson Universiy of Illinois a UrbanaChampaign Allen M. Poeshman Universiy of Illinois a UrbanaChampaign Joshua Whie Universiy
More informationOption Pricing Under Stochastic Interest Rates
I.J. Engineering and Manufacuring, 0,3, 889 ublished Online June 0 in MECS (hp://www.mecspress.ne) DOI: 0.585/ijem.0.03. Available online a hp://www.mecspress.ne/ijem Opion ricing Under Sochasic Ineres
More information