Ground Water Level Monitoring Survey Results

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Ground Water Level Monitoring Survey Results"

Transcription

1 Ground Water Level Monitoring Survey Results Alabama...2 Arizona...6 Arkansas...10 California...14 Colorado...18 Connecticut...22 Delaware-1 (Delaware Department of Agriculture)...24 Delaware-2 (Delaware Geological Survey)...28 Florida-1 (Florida Department of Environmental Protection)...32 Florida-2 (Southwest Florida Water Management District)...36 Georgia...40 Hawaii...44 Illinois...48 Indiana...52 Kansas...56 Louisiana...60 Maine...64 Maryland...66 Massachusetts...70 Minnesota...74 Mississippi...78 Missouri...82 Montana...86 Nebraska...90 Nevada...94 New Hampshire...98 New Jersey New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio -1 (Ohio Dept of Natural Resources, Division of Water) Ohio-2 (Miami Conservancy District) Oklahoma Oregon Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Texas Utah Vermont Virginia 1 (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality) Virginia-2 (Virginia Department of Environmental Quality) Washington Wisconsin Wyoming...173

2 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Alabama 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State Geological Survey 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based 2

3 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Irrigation wells Public water supply wells Springs 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 450 with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY:

4 15. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Owner Driller Aquifer code Land surface elevation Method of measuring elevation Date drilled Well type Well depth Source of depth Type of pump Type of power for the pump Primary water use Water level available Measuring point information Construction method Completion method Depth of open or screened interval Casing depths Casing diameter 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) U.S. Geological Survey 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government 4

5 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? c. Data for some wells are available on the Internet 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Blakeney Gillett Agency Geological Survey of Alabama Address P. O. Box City Tuscaloosa State Alabama Zip Phone bgillett@gsa.state.al.us 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? 5

6 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Arizona 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? How much ground water is currently being used? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Department of Water Resources 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds We receive some matching Federal funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Based on physiography Based on designated groundwater basins 6

7 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Irrigation wells Public water supply wells Remote sensing devices 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI- ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY:

8 16. Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Source of coordinates Owner Driller Land surface elevation Method of measuring elevation User code Date drilled Well type Well depth Source of depth Type of pump Type of power for the pump Pump horsepower Primary water use Secondary water use Tertiary water use Water level available Water quality available Measuring point information Well log available Construction method Completion method Screen material Depth of open or screened interval Casing material Casing depths Casing diameter 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the statewide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government U.S. Geological Survey 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the statewide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 8

9 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? a. Yes, all data 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. Name Teri Davis Agency Arizona Department of Water Resources Phone tddavis@azwater.gov 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Dale Mason Agency Arizona Department of Water Resources Address 3550 North Central Ave. City Phoenix State Arizona Zip Phone damason@azwater.gov 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? There are a number of other agencies that maintain water level monitoring sites with the state. They include: City of Tucson, City of Phoenix, The Salt River Project, the Bureau of Land Management (in the San Pedro National Riparian Conservation Area) 9

10 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Arkansas 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network One or more regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring networks An interstate ground water level monitoring network, a portion of which is in the state 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? How much ground water is currently being used? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? How much ground water is currently being used? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Department of Natural Resources Also, USGS and NRCS 10

11 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? About federal and state 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Irrigation wells Public water supply wells Springs industrial wells 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 1100 with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY):

12 14. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees USGS staff NRCS employees 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Source of coordinates Aquifer code Land surface elevation Method of measuring elevation Well type Well depth Source of depth Water level available Water quality available Casing depths 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) U.S. Geological Survey 12

13 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) U.S. Geological Survey 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? a. Yes, all data 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Tony P. Schrader Agency USGS Address 401 Hardin Rd City Little Rock State AR Zip Phone tpschrad@usgs.gov 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. Name Jim Battreal Agency Arkansas Natural Resources Commission Phone jim.battreal@arkansas.gov 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? 13

14 1. For what state, do your responses apply? California 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network One or more regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring networks One or more regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring networks are being considered for development An interstate ground water level monitoring network, a portion of which is in the state 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? What is the ground water quantity contribution to surface water, and vice versa? What type(s) of uses (e.g. domestic, irrigation, livestock, industrial, etc.) is ground water suitable for? land subsidence due to gw withdrawal 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? What is the age of ground water within an aquifer? What is the ground water quantity contribution to surface water, and vice versa? What type(s) of uses (e.g. domestic, irrigation, livestock, industrial, etc.) is ground water suitable for? How much ground water is currently being used? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Department of Water Resources Regional or local government agency 14

15 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based Watershed based Based on physiography Based on political subdivisions of the state 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Irrigation wells Public water supply wells Stream baseflow measurements 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: 42,916 8, Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 12. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): 13. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): 14. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY: 15. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: 16. Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED):

16 17. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees Regional or local government employees Water providers USGS staff 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Source of coordinates Owner Driller Land surface elevation Method of measuring elevation Date drilled Well type Well depth Source of depth Type of pump Type of power for the pump Primary water use Water level available Water quality available Measuring point information Well log available Construction method Completion method Screen material Depth of open or screened interval Casing material Casing depths Casing diameter not all info available for all wells 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No written SOP's for data collection 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No written SOP's for data management and storage 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes Some 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? c. Data for some wells are available on the Internet 16

17 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Eric Senter Agency California Department of Water Resources Address PO Box City Sacramento State CA Zip Phone Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? We don't track the measurement frequency of wells, so no response to questions Might be able to query the DB to figure this out if it were really important - let me know. 17

18 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Colorado 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) No state-wide ground water level monitoring network One or more regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring networks 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. Regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? What is the ground water quantity contribution to surface water, and vice versa? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State Engineer's Office 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based Watershed based 18

19 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Irrigation wells Public water supply wells Former oil and gas production wells 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 1200 with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY:

20 15. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees Regional or local government employees Water providers USGS staff Groundwater Management Districts 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Source of coordinates Owner Aquifer code Land surface elevation Well depth Water level available Measuring point information 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No written SOP's for data collection 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No written SOP's for data management and storage 20

21 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? a. Yes, all data 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Michael Schaubs Agency Division of Water Resources-Office of State Engine Address 1313 Sherman Street Room 818 City Denver State Colorado Zip Phone michael.schaubs@state.co.us 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? 21

22 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Connecticut 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) No state-wide ground water level monitoring network 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. Other, please specify No program 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) No program 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) No program 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level network 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: 11. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 12. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): 22

23 13. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): 14. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY: 15. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: 16. Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): 17. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": 18. Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring program 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? e. No state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? Information provide by Corinne Fitting with Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection 23

24 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Delaware-1 (Delaware Department of Agriculture) 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State Geological Survey Department of Agriculture 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly federal funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells 24

25 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 102 with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY:

26 16. Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Aquifer code Land surface elevation Date drilled Well type Well depth Water level available Water quality available Depth of open or screened interval Casing diameter 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) Do not know 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 26

27 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name Laura Mensch Agency Delaware Department of Agriculture Address 2320 South DuPont Hwy. City Dover State Delaware Zip Phone Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. Name Scott Andres Agency Delaware Geological Survey Phone Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? The Delaware Department of Agriculture (DDA) maintains a network of dedicated monitoring wells, used mainly for monitoring for pesticide residues. Water levels are taken quarterly for almost all wells. The DDA's network is not the sole well network for the state, however; the network maintained by the Delaware Geological Survey is probably more comprehensive, as I believe some wells have real time water level sensors in place. Also, a note about the website containing the water level information from the network: the data are no longer being updated (most current year is 2003). Hopefully this will change and we will be able to post all the current data. 27

28 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Delaware-2 (Delaware Geological Survey) 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? What is the ground water quantity contribution to surface water, and vice versa? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) How effective are ground water management programs in managing ground water withdrawals? What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? What are the impacts to ground water levels due to over-pumping of aquifers? What is the age of ground water within an aquifer? What is the ground water quantity contribution to surface water, and vice versa? How much ground water is currently being used? Support flow model development, calib., valid. 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State Geological Survey 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds 28

29 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based Watershed based Based on physiography Based on political subdivisions of the state 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Stream baseflow measurements Unused water quality monitoring wells Former public water supply wells (pumps removed 10. (NOTE: Questions are designed to determine the number of wells or observation points in your network, the frequency of measurement, and the length of available historic record. Please respond with that in mind.) Responses for TOTAL WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS IN YOUR NETWORK: Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST ONCE PER YEAR: 85 with at least 5 years of measurements Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST TWICE PER YEAR (SEMI-ANNUAL): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST 4 TIMES PER YEAR (QUARTERLY): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST MONTHLY:

30 15. Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST WEEKLY: Response for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY (INSTRUMENTED): Responses for WELLS OR OBSERVATION POINTS MEASURED AT LEAST DAILY, AND AVAILABLE IN "REAL TIME": Who collects ground water level data for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) State government employees 19. What information is typically available for wells or observation points in the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Well number/name County code Latitude/Longitude Source of coordinates Owner Driller Aquifer code Land surface elevation Method of measuring elevation User code Date drilled Land use in the area Weather/climate at time of sampling Well type Well depth Source of depth Primary water use Water level available Water quality available Measuring point information Well log available Construction method Completion method Screen material Depth of open or screened interval Casing material Casing depths Casing diameter geophys log, site notes, site photo 20. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for FIELD DATA COLLECTION for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government U.S. Geological Survey 30

31 21. The written Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) used for DATA MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network were developed by: (check all that apply) State government U.S. Geological Survey 22. Are the data collected for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network routinely entered/maintained in a computer data base? Yes 23. Are the data available on a website accessible to the public? c. Data for some wells are available on the Internet 24. If you are NOT the contact person for additional information on the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network, please provide his/her contact information below. 25. Contact information for the person completing this survey. Name A. Scott Andres Agency Delaware Geological Survey Address University of Delaware City Newark State DE Zip Phone asandres@udel.edu 26. Are you aware of other individuals who may be able to provide information on other ground water level monitoring programs in your state, either state-wide or regional? If so, please provide name and contact information. 27. Please share any additional comments on state-wide or regional ground water level monitoring networks in your state? USGS has virtually abandoned the gw level monitoring network for DE and have stopped accepting state provided data for inclusion in NWIS and hence, all USGS research efforts. 31

32 1. For what state, do your responses apply? Florida-1 (Florida Department of Environmental Protection) 2. Please consider throughout the survey that (1) the interest is in identifying monitoring networks that are NOT targeted to known contaminated sites, e.g. Superfund sites and (2) the term "regional" is meant to refer to monitoring networks that cover large, multi-county areas within a state. Given points 1 and 2, does your state have: (check all that apply) A state-wide ground water level monitoring network One or more regional (large, multi-county area within the state) ground water level monitoring networks 3. Please select one from the following list. Then answer questions 4 through 24 based on the specific network you selected. If you are responsible for both a state-wide and regional ground water level monitoring network and do not have time to take the survey twice to cover both, we ask that you complete the survey for the state-wide network. State-wide ground water level monitoring network 4. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network IS INTENDED TO provide ground water level data to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? 5. Please indicate whether the existing state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network COULD BE USED to answer the following questions: (check all that apply) What are the trends in ground water levels over time? What are the effects of drought/climate change? How/why do ground water levels change over time? What is the current background (ambient) ground water level condition? 6. Who manages the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Department of Environmental Protection/Environmental Quality 7. How is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network funded? Mostly state and/or county and/or local government funds 8. Is the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network designed based on: (check all that apply) Aquifer based Watershed based 9. What wells or other observation points are used for the state-wide/regional ground water level monitoring network? (check all that apply) Dedicated water level monitoring wells Domestic wells or other private wells Public water supply wells Unused water quality monitoring wells 32

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution

Public School Teacher Experience Distribution. Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Mode Alabama Percent of Teachers FY Public School Teacher Experience Distribution Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile

More information

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access

Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Three-Year Moving Averages by States % Home Internet Access Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana

More information

Impacts of Sequestration on the States

Impacts of Sequestration on the States Impacts of Sequestration on the States Alabama Alabama will lose about $230,000 in Justice Assistance Grants that support law STOP Violence Against Women Program: Alabama could lose up to $102,000 in funds

More information

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability

Workers Compensation State Guidelines & Availability ALABAMA Alabama State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Alabama 1-2 Weeks ALASKA ARIZONA Arizona State Specific Release Form Control\Release Forms_pdf\Arizona 7-8 Weeks by mail By Mail ARKANSAS

More information

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST

NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST NON-RESIDENT INDEPENDENT, PUBLIC, AND COMPANY ADJUSTER LICENSING CHECKLIST ** Utilize this list to determine whether or not a non-resident applicant may waive the Oklahoma examination or become licensed

More information

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena)

MAINE (Augusta) Maryland (Annapolis) MICHIGAN (Lansing) MINNESOTA (St. Paul) MISSISSIPPI (Jackson) MISSOURI (Jefferson City) MONTANA (Helena) HAWAII () IDAHO () Illinois () MAINE () Maryland () MASSACHUSETTS () NEBRASKA () NEVADA (Carson ) NEW HAMPSHIRE () OHIO () OKLAHOMA ( ) OREGON () TEXAS () UTAH ( ) VERMONT () ALABAMA () COLORADO () INDIANA

More information

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees:

Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Chex Systems, Inc. does not currently charge a fee to place, lift or remove a freeze; however, we reserve the right to apply the following fees: Security Freeze Table AA, AP and AE Military addresses*

More information

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State

High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State High Risk Health Pools and Plans by State State Program Contact Alabama Alabama Health 1-866-833-3375 Insurance Plan 1-334-263-8311 http://www.alseib.org/healthinsurance/ahip/ Alaska Alaska Comprehensive

More information

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms.

Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Englishinusa.com Positions in MSN under different search terms. Search Term Position 1 Accent Reduction Programs in USA 1 2 American English for Business Students 1 3 American English for Graduate Students

More information

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES Small Business Ownership Description Total number of employer firms and self-employment in the state per 100 people in the labor force, 2003. Explanation Business ownership

More information

American C.E. Requirements

American C.E. Requirements American C.E. Requirements Alaska Board of Nursing Two of the following: 30 contact hours 30 hours of professional nursing activities 320 hours of nursing employment Arizona State Board of Nursing Arkansas

More information

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011

State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & Regulations. As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 State Pest Control/Pesticide Application Laws & As Compiled by NPMA, as of December 2011 Alabama http://alabamaadministrativecode.state.al.us/docs/agr/mcword10agr9.pdf Alabama Pest Control Alaska http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20aac%2090.pdf

More information

Licensure Resources by State

Licensure Resources by State Licensure Resources by State Alabama Alabama State Board of Social Work Examiners http://socialwork.alabama.gov/ Alaska Alaska Board of Social Work Examiners http://commerce.state.ak.us/dnn/cbpl/professionallicensing/socialworkexaminers.as

More information

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network

Net-Temps Job Distribution Network Net-Temps Job Distribution Network The Net-Temps Job Distribution Network is a group of 25,000 employment-related websites with a local, regional, national, industry and niche focus. Net-Temps customers'

More information

State Tax Information

State Tax Information State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither

More information

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans

I have been asked to pose the following questions to the list serve regarding disaster recovery plans Topic: Question by: : Disaster Recovery Plan Scott W. Anderson Nevada Date: November 19, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District

More information

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements

State-Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Effective 10/16/11: Producers holding a life line of authority on or before 10/16/11 who sell or wish to sell

More information

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State

NAIC ANNUITY TRAINING Regulations By State Select a state below to display the current regulation and requirements, or continue to scroll down. Light grey text signifies states that have not adopted an annuity training program. Alabama Illinois

More information

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS

STATE-SPECIFIC ANNUITY SUITABILITY REQUIREMENTS Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Annuity Training Requirement Currently Effective Initial 8-Hour Annuity Training Requirement:

More information

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11

State Specific Annuity Suitability Requirements updated 10/10/11 Alabama Alaska Ai Arizona Arkansas California This jurisdiction has pending annuity training legislation/regulation Initial 8 Hour Annuity Training Requirement: Prior to selling annuities in California,

More information

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year

Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year Page 1 of 7 (https://www.insidehighered.com) Data show key role for community colleges in 4-year degree production Submitted by Doug Lederman on September 10, 2012-3:00am The notion that community colleges

More information

State Tax Information

State Tax Information State Tax Information The information contained in this document is not intended or written as specific legal or tax advice and may not be relied on for purposes of avoiding any state tax penalties. Neither

More information

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement

State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement State by State Summary of Nurses Allowed to Perform Conservative Sharp Debridement THE FOLLOWING ARE ONLY GENERAL SUMMARIES OF THE PRACTICE ACTS EACH STATE HAS REGARDING CONSERVATIVE SHARP DEBRIDEMENT

More information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption Real Progress in Food Code Adoption August 27, 2013 The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food

More information

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption

Real Progress in Food Code Adoption Real Progress in Food Code Adoption The Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO), under contract to the Food and Drug Administration, is gathering data on the progress of FDA Food Code adoptions by

More information

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1

Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1 Supplier Business Continuity Survey - Update Page 1 Supplier Business Continuity Survey A response is required for every question General Information Supplier Name: JCI Supplier Number: Supplier Facility

More information

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL

What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules. John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Bradley University, Peoria, IL What to Know About State CPA Reciprocity Rules Paul Swanson, MBA, CPA Instructor of Accounting John Gillett, PhD, CPA Chair, Department of Accounting Kevin Berry, PhD, Assistant Professor of Accounting

More information

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service

Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service Schedule B DS1 & DS3 Service SCHEDULE B Private Line Data Services DS1 & DS3 Service... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, New Jersey... 2 DS-1 Local Access Channel, Out-of-State...

More information

IT Spending Comparison. Date: February 28, 2013. [IT Spending Comparison] [February 28, 2013]

IT Spending Comparison. Date: February 28, 2013. [IT Spending Comparison] [February 28, 2013] Topic: Question by: : IT Spending Comparison Jenny Acker Wisconsin Date: February 28, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District

More information

********************

******************** THE SURETY & FIDELITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA 1101 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 800 Washington, D. C. 20036 Phone: (202) 463-0600 Fax: (202) 463-0606 Web page: www.surety.org APPLICATION Application

More information

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1

In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1 In-state Tuition & Fees at Flagship Universities by State 2014-15 Rank School State In-state Tuition & Fees Penn State University Park Pennsylvania 1 $18,464 New New Hampshire 2 Hampshire $16,552 3 Vermont

More information

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by Specific Alabama Alaska 10/16/2011 TBD Arizona Arkansas If you obtained a life insurance license prior to 10/16/11, you must complete the NAIC course by 4/16/12.

More information

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds

List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds List of State Residual Insurance Market Entities and State Workers Compensation Funds On November 26, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-297,

More information

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION

NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY [STATE] LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION NOTICE OF PROTECTION PROVIDED BY This notice provides a brief summary of the [STATE] Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association (the Association) and the protection it provides for policyholders. This

More information

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based

Attachment A. Program approval is aligned to NCATE and is outcomes/performance based Attachment A The following table provides information on student teaching requirements across several states. There are several models for these requirements; minimum number of weeks, number of required

More information

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State

NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by State NAIC Annuity Suitability Requirements by Specific Alabama Alaska 10/16/2011 TBD Arizona Arkansas If you obtained a life insurance license prior to 10/16/11, you must complete the NAIC course by 4/16/12.

More information

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

More information

Current State Regulations

Current State Regulations Current State Regulations Alabama: Enacted in 1996, the state of Alabama requires all licensed massage therapists to * A minimum of 650 classroom hours at an accredited school approved by the state of

More information

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF

STATE DATA CENTER. District of Columbia MONTHLY BRIEF District of Columbia STATE DATA CENTER MONTHLY BRIEF N o v e m b e r 2 0 1 2 District Residents Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2010 By Minwuyelet Azimeraw Joy Phillips, Ph.D. This report is based on data

More information

July 2012 (1) States With Negative Growth 22 States With Positive Growth 25

July 2012 (1) States With Negative Growth 22 States With Positive Growth 25 Respondent Coverage: 100% July 2012 Current Month Current Month New England 9.5% Connecticut -3.3% Maine 3.6% Massachusetts 24.1% New Hampshire -0.1% Rhode Island 13.3% Vermont -0.3% Middle Atlantic -3.5%

More information

Use of "Mail Box" service. Date: April 6, 2015. [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015]

Use of Mail Box service. Date: April 6, 2015. [Use of Mail Box Service] [April 6, 2015] Topic: Question by: : Use of "Mail Box" service Kathy M. Sachs Kansas Date: April 6, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District

More information

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production.

SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS. or branches outside of its home state primarily for the purpose of deposit production. SECTION 109 HOST STATE LOAN-TO-DEPOSIT RATIOS The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the agencies)

More information

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES

GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES GOVERNMENT-FINANCED EMPLOYMENT AND THE REAL PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE 50 STATES BY KEITH HALL AND ROBERT GREENE November 25, 2013 www.mercatus.org 0.7 2.4 4.2 FEDERAL CONTRACT FUNDED PRIVATE-SECTOR JOBS AS

More information

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION

2014 INCOME EARNED BY STATE INFORMATION BY STATE INFORMATION This information is being provided to assist in your 2014 tax preparations. The information is also mailed to applicable Columbia fund non-corporate shareholders with their year-end

More information

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC.

We do require the name and mailing address of each person forming the LLC. Topic: LLC Managers/Members Question by: Jeff Harvey : Idaho Date: March 7, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Arizona requires that member-managed LLCs

More information

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273

STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 STATISTICAL BRIEF #273 December 29 Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 28 Beth Levin Crimmel, M.S. Introduction Employees of state and

More information

$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants

$7.5 appropriation $6.5 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016. Preschool Development Grants School Readiness: High-Quality Early Learning Head Start $10.5 $9.5 $10.1 +$1.5 +17.7% $8.5 $7.5 +$2.1 +27.0% $6.5 for fiscal year 2010 Included in the budget is $1.078 billion to ensure that every Head

More information

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, 2013. [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013]

Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Date: July 29, 2013. [Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C)] [July 29, 2013] Topic: Question by: : Low-Profit Limited Liability Company (L3C) Kevin Rayburn, Esq., MBA Tennessee Date: July 29, 2013 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado

More information

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List

Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List Recruitment and Retention Resources By State List Alabama $5,000 rural physician tax credit o http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/alcode/40/18/4a/40-18-132 o http://adph.org/ruralhealth/index.asp?id=882 Area Health

More information

Overview of School Choice Policies

Overview of School Choice Policies Overview of School Choice Policies Tonette Salazar, Director of State Relations Micah Wixom, Policy Analyst CSG West Education Committee July 29, 2015 Who we are The essential, indispensable member of

More information

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010

LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010 Renewable Energy LPSC Renewable Energy Pilot y RFPs issued by Utility Companies by Order of Commission, November 2010 y Searching for various forms of renewable energy and their actual cost in Louisiana

More information

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009

Census Data on Uninsured Women and Children September 2009 March of Dimes Foundation Office of Government Affairs 1146 19 th Street, NW, 6 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Telephone (202) 659-1800 Fax (202) 296-2964 marchofdimes.com nacersano.org Census Data on Uninsured

More information

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA

(In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES FECA LHWCA (In effect as of January 1, 2004*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES Full Medical Benefits** Alabama Indiana Nebraska South Carolina Alaska Iowa Nevada South Dakota

More information

COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES. Selected Business Costs for Each State. Workers Compensation Rates

COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES. Selected Business Costs for Each State. Workers Compensation Rates COMPARE NEBRASKA S BUSINESS CLIMATE TO OTHER STATES Selected Business Costs for Each State Workers Compensation Rates Unemployment Insurance Costs Electricity Rates Gas Rates Average Hourly Earnings in

More information

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide Overview of AHA RACTrac Survey Results, 4 th Quarter 2010 For complete report go to: http://www.aha.org/aha/issues/rac/ractrac.html Agenda

More information

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers

The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers The Obama Administration and Community Health Centers Community health centers are a critical source of health care for millions of Americans particularly those in underserved communities. Thanks primarily

More information

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013

recovery: Projections of Jobs and Education Requirements Through 2020 June 2013 recovery: Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through June 2013 Projections of Jobs and Requirements Through This report projects education requirements linked to forecasted job growth by state and the

More information

Q1 2009 Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009

Q1 2009 Homeowner Confidence Survey. May 14, 2009 Q1 2009 Homeowner Confidence Survey Results May 14, 2009 The Zillow Homeowner Confidence Survey is fielded quarterly to determine the confidence level of American homeowners when it comes to the value

More information

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon)

States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon) States Ranked by Alcohol Tax Rates: Beer (as of March 2009) Ranking State Beer Tax (per gallon) Sales Tax Applied 1 Wyoming $0.02 4% 2 4 8 10 Missouri $0.06 4.225% Wisconsin $0.06 5% Colorado $0.08 2.9%

More information

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor

A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Original Medicare Claims Processor A/B MAC Jurisdiction 1 Jurisdiction 1 - American Samoa, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada and Northern Mariana Islands Total Number of Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries: 3,141,183 (as of Total Number of Beneficiaries

More information

State Government Subsidies for Retirement Plans Sponsored by Local Governments. National Conference of State Legislatures, January 2010

State Government Subsidies for Retirement Plans Sponsored by Local Governments. National Conference of State Legislatures, January 2010 Government Subsidies for Retirement Plans Sponsored by Local Governments National Conference of State Legislatures, January 2010 In many states, city and county governments, independent school districts,

More information

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota

Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act. Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger. William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota Topic: Question by: : Question for the filing office of Texas, Re: the Texas LLC act Professor Daniel S. Kleinberger William Mitchell College of Law, Minnesota Date: March 18, 2012 Manitoba Corporations

More information

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY

THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY THE 2013 HPS SALARY SURVEY Stephen L. Bump Introduction The 2013 Health Physics Society (HPS) survey data was collected by having health physicists (HPs) submit their responses to survey questions on a

More information

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010

IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner. Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds. Date: 5 August 2010 Topic: IRS Request for Assistance re New EIN and True Owner Question by: Sarah Steinbeck on behalf of Leslie Reynolds Jurisdiction: Colorado/NASS Date: 5 August 2010 Jurisdiction Question(s) Have you spoken

More information

US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program. Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official

US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program. Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official US Department of Health and Human Services Exclusion Program Thomas Sowinski Special Agent in Charge/ Reviewing Official Overview Authority to exclude individuals and entities from Federal Health Care

More information

Full Medical Benefits**

Full Medical Benefits** (In effect as of January 1, 2006*) TABLE 5a. MEDICAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATUTES Full Medical Benefits** Alabama Indiana Nebraska South Carolina Alaska Iowa Nevada South Dakota

More information

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York

Acceptable Certificates from States other than New York Alabama 2 2 Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Teacher Yes Professional Educator Certificate 5 Years Support Services Yes Alaska 2 Regular Certificate, Type A 5 Years, renewable Teacher Yes At least

More information

Please contact test@test.com if you have any questions regarding this survey.

Please contact test@test.com if you have any questions regarding this survey. 1. Which of the following best describes your position within the company? - CEO/owner - Partner/senior executive - Professional (consultant, legal, medical, architect) - Finance/accounting/purchasing

More information

LLC Domestications. Date: March 23, 2015. [LLC Domestication] [March 23, 2015]

LLC Domestications. Date: March 23, 2015. [LLC Domestication] [March 23, 2015] Topic: Question by: : LLC Domestications Earl B. Weaver, Jr. Illinois Date: March 23, 2015 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Alabama has removed the term domestication from our Code for

More information

NCSL Capitol Security Survey (2009 2010)

NCSL Capitol Security Survey (2009 2010) NCSL Capitol Security Survey (2009 2010) 1. Please list your state Alabama 2 3% Alaska 1 2% Arizona 0 0% Arkansas 1 2% California 1 2% Colorado 3 5% Connecticut 0 0% Delaware 1 2% Florida 1 2% Georgia

More information

County - $0.55/$500 - $.75/$500 depending on +/- 2 million population 0.11% - 0.15% Minnesota

County - $0.55/$500 - $.75/$500 depending on +/- 2 million population 0.11% - 0.15% Minnesota 22-Apr-13 State Deed Transfer and Mortgage Tax Rates, 2012 Alabama State Tax Description Transfer Fee Rate Deeds $0.50/$500 0.10% Mortgages $0.15/$100 0.15% Alaska Arizona $2 fee per deed or contract Flat

More information

LLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin. Jurisdiction. Date: 01 March 2011. LLC Member/Manager Disclosure 2011 March 01

LLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin. Jurisdiction. Date: 01 March 2011. LLC Member/Manager Disclosure 2011 March 01 Topic: LLC Member/Manager Disclosure Question by: Cathy Beaudoin : Maine Date: 01 March 2011 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Our statement of information (aka annual

More information

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011 Nurse Aide Training Requirements, 2011 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified

More information

Registered Nurses in Wyoming Fact Sheet Prepared for Statewide Nursing Summit University of Wyoming - June 18, 2004

Registered Nurses in Wyoming Fact Sheet Prepared for Statewide Nursing Summit University of Wyoming - June 18, 2004 Data Prepared by 307.473.3837 william.glover@state.wy.us Publications Relevant to Data Presented Glover, W. (2003), Nursing in Wyoming Part III. Wyoming Labor Force Trends. April 2003,, Research & Planning,

More information

Alabama Statewide. Arkansas Statewide

Alabama Statewide. Arkansas Statewide Alabama Statewide Alabama generally follows the guidelines of the or ICC, which in turn recognizes the American Society of Sanitary Engineering (ASSE) 1055 requirements, and consequently Alabama s IPC

More information

2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014

2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report. Section 3 Billing Rates. Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter 2014 2015 National Utilization and Compensation Survey Report Section 3 Billing s Based on Data Collected: 4 th Quarter Copyright 2015 Reproduction of this report or portions thereof without express written

More information

Consent to Appointment as Registered Agent

Consent to Appointment as Registered Agent Consent to Appointment as Registered Agent This form is used by the person or business entity that agrees to act as the registered agent for a limited liability company. Every person or business entity

More information

Fuel Taxes: December 2012. A State-by-State Comparison

Fuel Taxes: December 2012. A State-by-State Comparison Fuel Taxes: A -by- Comparison December 2012 The 18th Amendment to the Washington Constitution dedicates motor fuel tax collections to highway purposes. Strategic Planning and Finance Number of s Fuel

More information

OPT Extension Application Process 11/22/2010

OPT Extension Application Process 11/22/2010 OPT Extension Application Process 11/22/2010 Step One: Request an I-20 recommending OPT Extension from Designated School Officer (DSO) (Pi-Shin pishin@npu.edu or Bill wjw@npu.edu or Jessie jessie@npu.edu)

More information

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435

STATISTICAL BRIEF #435 STATISTICAL BRIEF #435 April 2014 Premiums and Employee Contributions for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance: Private versus Public Sector, 2012 Karen E. Davis, MA Introduction Employer-sponsored health

More information

Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA 92173 (619)

Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA 92173 (619) Prepared by : Michael R. Fowlkes CBP / Fraudulent Document Officer San Ysidro Port of Entry 720 E. San Ysidro Blvd. San Ysidro, CA 92173 (619) 662-7342 Social Security Facts: The Social Security act was

More information

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014

Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014 Nurse Aide Training Requirements, October 2014 Background Federal legislation (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and associated regulations (42 CFR 483.152) require that Medicare- and Medicaid-certified

More information

Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report

Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report Sample/Excerpts ONLY Not Full Report Contents at a Glance CONTENTS AT A GLANCE... 2 HOME AUTOMATION USA MARKET... 4 DESCRIPTION... 4 KEY BENEFITS... 4 KEYWORDS... 4 REGION-BASED HOME AUTOMATION MARKET

More information

FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS. 46 states have felony DUI. Charts 1 and 2 detail the felony threshold for each of the 46 states analyzed.

FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS. 46 states have felony DUI. Charts 1 and 2 detail the felony threshold for each of the 46 states analyzed. FELONY DUI SYNOPSIS The information in the following charts was compiled by examining the felony DUI laws in all 50 sates and the District of Columbia. The analysis focuses on the felony DUI threshold,

More information

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006

State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006 State Individual Income Taxes: Treatment of Select Itemized Deductions, 2006 State Federal Income Tax State General Sales Tax State Personal Property Tax Interest Expenses Medical Expenses Charitable Contributions

More information

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY

THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY THE 2012 HPS SALARY SURVEY Gary Lauten Introduction The 2012 Health Physics Society (HPS) survey data was collected by having health physicists (HPs) submit their responses to survey questions on a webbased

More information

Verizon Wireless Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance in Five Regions; AT&T Ranks Highest in One Region

Verizon Wireless Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance in Five Regions; AT&T Ranks Highest in One Region Reports: Tablet and Mobile Broadband Devices Generate Increased Data Quality Issues as Usage Patterns and Customer Expectations Impact Problem Incidence Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance

More information

Forestry Reading Room

Forestry Reading Room University of Arkansas School of Law Division of Agriculture www.nationalaglawcenter.com Forestry Reading Room Compilation of State Forestry Organizations Rusty W. Rumley Staff Attorney and Nastasya Knyazhishcheva

More information

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013

14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013 14-Sep-15 State and Local Tax Deduction by State, Tax Year 2013 (millions) deduction in state dollars) claimed (dollars) taxes paid [1] state AGI United States 44.2 100.0 30.2 507.7 100.0 11,483 100.0

More information

Liquor Wine Beer Other taxes

Liquor Wine Beer Other taxes 6-Feb-5 State Alcohol Excise Tax Rates 205 State Tax Rate ($ per gallon) Sales tax applied? Liquor Wine Beer Tax Rate Sales tax Tax Rate Sales tax ($ per gallon) applied? ($ per gallon) applied? Alabama

More information

Question by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, 2012. [LLC Question] [2012-03-29]

Question by: Karon Beyer. Date: March 28, 2012. [LLC Question] [2012-03-29] Topic: LLC Question Question by: Karon Beyer : Florida Date: March 28, 2012 Manitoba Corporations Canada Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Arizona uses "manager" or "member," but not

More information

PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION

PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY COMPENSATION Background After concerns were raised about the level of compensation being paid to some public housing authority (PHA) leaders, in August 2011 HUD reached out to

More information

Connecticut s Insurance Industry: Economic Impacts & Contributions

Connecticut s Insurance Industry: Economic Impacts & Contributions Connecticut s Insurance Industry: Economic Impacts & Contributions Prepared by: Connecticut Economic Resource Center, Inc. December 2006 2006 Insure Connecticut s Future, Connecticut Insurance and Financial

More information

Facing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value

Facing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value w Reports: Health Insurance Marketplace Exchange Enrollment Satisfaction Improves Significantly in Second Year Facing Cost-Sensitive Shoppers, Health Plan Providers Must Demonstrate Value WESTLAKE VILLAGE,

More information

J.D. Power Reports: Strong Network Quality Performance Is Key to Higher Customer Retention for Wireless Carriers

J.D. Power Reports: Strong Network Quality Performance Is Key to Higher Customer Retention for Wireless Carriers Kw J.D. Power Reports: Strong Network Quality Performance Is Key to Higher Customer Retention for Wireless Carriers Ranks Highest in Wireless Network Quality Performance in All Six Regions WESTLAKE VILLAGE,

More information

Internet Prescribing Summary

Internet Prescribing Summary Internet Prescribing Summary, Minnesota,,, South Dakota and Wisconsin (July 2011) Advancements in medicine and technology have transformed the way health care is delivered to patients. However, laws governing

More information

Compulsory Auto Insurance and Financial Responsibility Laws State Reporting Programs

Compulsory Auto Insurance and Financial Responsibility Laws State Reporting Programs NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES EMPLOYMENT AND INSURANCE PROGRAM Compulsory Auto Insurance and Laws State Reporting Programs 1 Alabama 32-7-6 32-7A-6 2000 32-7A-7 32-7A-7 Alaska 28.20 28.22.011

More information

22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy

22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy 22 States do not provide access to Chapter 9 Bankruptcy -Georgia explicitly denies access to municipal bankruptcy. (GA Code 36 80-5) States with No Statutes: Alaska Delaware Hawaii Indiana Kansas Maine

More information

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State

State Tax of Social Security Income. State Tax of Pension Income. State State Taxation of Retirement Income The following chart shows generally which states tax retirement income, including and pension States shaded indicate they do not tax these forms of retirement State

More information