STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE
|
|
- Melvyn Reed
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE HARRY O. LUTZ AND PAULA G. LUTZ; Hon. Case No. v ONE WEST, a successor in interest to INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B.; TITLE SOURCE, INC.; THE MORTGAGE EXCHANGE, INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. / JASON Q. WILSON (P59284) WILSON LAW GROUP, PLC Attorney for Plaintiffs 2000 Town Center Suite 1900 Southfield, MI (248) / COMPLAINT NOW COME the Plaintiffs HARRY O. LUTZ AND PAULA G. LUTZ (hereinafter referred to collectively as Plaintiffs ), by and through WILSON LAW GROUP, PLC and for their Complaint allege as follows: JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff's Harry and Paula Lutz are residents of the City of Plymouth in the County of Wayne for the State of Michigan. 2. IndyMac, FSB was a California Corporation, doing business in the State of Michigan.
2 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant One West is the successor in interest to IndyMac, FSB. 4. Defendant Stewart Michigan Title is a Michigan Corporation, doing business in the County of Oakland in the State of Michigan. 5. Defendant Mortgage Exchange Inc. is an Illinois Corporation, doing business in the State of Michigan. 6. Defendant Title Source Inc. is a Michigan Corporation, doing business in the State of Michigan. 7. Upon information and belief, the acts, omissions, and transactions relating to the subject matter for this Complaint occurred in the County of Wayne in the State of Michigan. 8. Plaintiffs' former residence at Tournament Drive Northville Michigan, hereinafter referred to in this Complaint as the subject property is located in the County of Wayne in the State of Michigan. 9. Plaintiffs' damages are in excess of $25,000. FACTS 10. Plaintiffs herein reaffirm and re-allege allegations from paragraphs 1 through On or about March 15, 2004 (closing date), Plaintiffs entered into a consumer transaction with Defendant IndyMac by obtaining a $750,000 mortgage loan secured by the subject property. 12. The loan on the subject property was a cash out refinance in the amount of $750, Upon information and belief, the terms of the first loan on the subject property mandated a 30 year repayment on Option ARM terms with a fixed payment for one year. 14. Upon information and belief, the Option ARM terms of the first loan offered the Plaintiffs various repayment options:
3 a. Minimum payments, which would cause an increase in the principal balance owed under the loan; b. Interest only payments, which would neither increase nor decrease the principal balance owed under the loan; c. Fully amortized payments, which would cause a decrease in the principal balance owed under the loan;. 15. Upon information and belief, the first loan contained a negative amortization feature wherein the outstanding principle balance would increase for the first five (5) years, up to 110% of the original loan value ($825,000). 16. Upon information and belief, the initial interest rate was an artificially discounted teaser rate of 1.25%. 17. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs were sold a loan disclosing an interest rate of 1.25%, however, as the loan contains a margin or buffer clause, the initial interest due on the loan was 4.675%. 18. Upon information and belief, the margin rate of 3.45% was excessive and was significantly higher than the industry standard for residential loans. 19. Upon information and belief, the interest rate of the first loan can be changed annually and has a cap of 8.95%, not including the margin of 3.45%. 20. Under the minimum payment option identified above, the initial monthly payment for Plaintiffs was $2, Upon information and belief, abiding by the minimum payment terms, Plaintiffs monthly payment after the initial five (5) year period would be $6, By this point in time, the outstanding balance on the first loan would have inflated to $803, due to the negative amortization feature in the loan terms. 22. Upon information and belief, Defendants knew, or should have known, based upon the
4 information available to them, the Plaintiffs would never be able to repay the loan securing their home. 23. The loan on the Plaintiffs' property effectively established a short-term lease, until the payments became so unaffordable that the borrowers would be forced into foreclosure and bankruptcy. The loans were structured in a way that made it so Plaintiffs would never be able to own their home free and clear of debt. 24. Upon information and belief, Defendants stepped outside the bounds of good faith and fair dealing and sold Plaintiffs a loan that was never a viable long-term product for the borrowers. Instead, the Defendants packaged loan vehicles which contained interest only, negative amortization payments, and an excessive kick-back to the mortgage broker. 25. Additionally, the Defendants on the first loan prevented Plaintiffs from buying themselves out of the debt by including a prepayment penalty which was not disclosed and exceeded the rate permitted by MCL c(2)(c). 26. Upon information and belief, Defendants acted intentionally, or with sufficient knowledge, in concealing the implications of the loan's terms to Plaintiffs and as a result, Plaintiffs lost their home to the Defendants in a trap set during the loan origination. 27. The terms of the loan were not clear and conspicuous and were based on flawed underwriting procedures, an understated finance charge, and other undisclosed rates, fees and terms which Defendants did not make clear, or deliberately excluded from the disclosures. 28. Upon information and belief, Defendants intentionally, or with requisite knowledge, failed to properly determine the ability of the Plaintiffs to repay their home loan through use of an approval process that used only stated income and the initial interest-only minimum monthly payment. Had Defendants used an appropriate approval process for determining the Plaintiffs' ability to repay the principle and interest of the loan, Plaintiffs would have never qualified for the loan. 29. Upon information and belief, Defendants failed to adequately disclose the terms of the entire loan transaction, including the negative amortization feature, the interest-only penalty, the
5 prepayment penalty, the finance charges of the loan, the calculation of costs and fees, the kick-backs paid to the originating broker, and the inherent volatility of the loan product packaged and sold by Defendants. The fundamental purpose of the loan was for Plaintiffs to own their home free of debt at the end of the repayment terms, a purpose which was knowingly or intentionally thwarted by Defendants' actions. 30. Upon information and belief, the Truth In Lending Disclosure (TILD), was inaccurate, as it disclosed an adjusted payment of only the fully indexed rate, rather than the highest possible rate on a variable rate transaction. 31. Upon information and belief, the approval for the loan was solely based on the loan-tovalue (LTV) ratio of 75%. At the time of loan origination, Plaintiffs were approved based solely upon stated income and a medium to high-risk credit rating. Further, the Plaintiffs had a debt-to-income ratio (DTI) as high as 55.74%. 32. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs' high DTI exceeds customary underwriting standards. 33. Upon information and belief, each of the Defendants were agents, principals, employees, employers, and co-conspirators of each and every other Defendant in this Complaint. 34. Upon information and belief, each of the said Defendants is, and at all relative periods of time, acting within the scope and consent of the remaining Defendants. 35. IndyMac was the original mortgage lender on the loan. 36. Stewart Title was the original title company for the loan. 37. Mortgage Exchange was the original broker for the loan. 38. MERS is believed to claim an undetermined interest in subject property, related to the second loan. 39. The Plaintiffs obtained a HELOC in May of 2006, which was used to pay short-term debt in the amount of $77,
6 40. From the date of origination of the first loan to the date of origination of the HELOC, the subject property suffered a significant loss in value, resulting in a new LTV of 88.24%. 41. Upon information and belief, when the negative amortization of the first loan took effect in the fifth (5 th ) year, the current LTV would have become 96.22%, assuming arguendo that the property did not continue to lose value. 42. Plaintiffs' income decreased between the origination date of the first loan and the origination date of the HELOC. At the time the HELOC was issued, even making only the minimum payment available under the terms of their loans, the Plaintiffs' DTI was 72.25%, 43. Upon information and belief, combining the payment values of both the full negatively amortized first loan and HELOC, the Plaintiffs were required to pay $9, per month in loan maintenance alone. Including previously incurred and disclosed debts, the Plaintiffs faced monthly payments exceeding $15,600. The total DTI ratio under this payment structure would equate to %. In laymen's terms, their income would fall short of covering their debts alone, not including standard living expenses. 44. Upon information and belief, Defendants had knowledge of the certainty of default Plaintiffs faced as a result of excessive DTI. COUNT I DEFENDANTS VIOLATED MCL c et seq 45. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through 44 above. 46. MCL c(2)(c) mandates that lenders shall note issue loans with a prepayment penalty in excess of 1% of the total loan value within the first three (3) years of the loan. 47. Defendants packaged a loan mandating a prepayment penalty, effective for the first three years, where if the borrower makes a full or partial repayment, totally more than twenty (20) percent of the original principle amount in any twelve (12) month period. The borrower will pay a prepayment penalty of six (6) months advanced interest on the amount prepaid in excess of twenty (20) percent of the original principle amount.
7 48. Defendants loan was in direct violation of MCL c. 49. The Defendants' violations have directly resulted in damages to Plaintiffs and should be used to rescind the original transaction. Furthermore, upon rescission of the original loan, the Defendants should be required to return all amounts paid under the illegal loan with reasonable interest. Failure to return the amounts paid under the predatory loan will result in unjust enrichment to Defendants. COUNT II DEFENDANTS VIOLATED 15 U.S.C. SECTION 1601 et seq. 50. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through 49 above. 51. Defendants violated 15 U.S.C. Section 1601 et seq. (TILA), by failing to provide Plaintiffs with accurate disclosures which were material to the transaction. 52. Defendants failed to disclose that the quoted 1.5% interest rate was variable and would increase over time. 53. Additionally, Defendants failed to disclose that the loan contained a prepayment penalty, which was in direct violation of MCL c. 54. Defendants' violations resulted in damages to Plaintiffs, including all amounts paid in relation to the transaction, amounts paid in bringing this action for resolution, and any and all other statutory damages arising under TILA, and other statutes herein pled. 55. Any and all statutes of limitations relating to the disclosures and notices, required under TILA, were tolled due to Defendants failure to effectively provide the required disclosures and notices. 56. The Defendants' violations have directly resulted in damages to Plaintiffs and should used to rescind the original transaction. Furthermore, upon rescission of the original loan, the Defendants should be required to return all amounts paid under the illegal loan with reasonable interest. Failure to return the amounts paid under the predatory loan will result in unjust enrichment to Defendants.
8 COUNT III DEFENDANTS VIOLATED 12 U.S.C. SECTION 2601 et seq. 57. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through 56 above. 58. Defendants sold Plaintiffs a federally-regulated mortgage loan, as defined in 12 U.S.C. Section 2601 (RESPA). 59. Upon information and belief, payments made by the lending Defendants to the brokering Defendants on the loan were not reasonably related to the goods, facilities, or services rendered, as required under RESPA. 60. Upon information and belief, Defendant Exchange was paid unearned fees by Defendant IndyMac, resulting in a mutual and wrongful benefit to the Defendants. These unearned fees were not disclosed to Plaintiffs and caused benefit to the Defendants at the expense of the Plaintiffs. 61. Upon information and belief, Defendant Exchange was paid 2.56% of the loan amount in fees, including a mortgage broker compensation of $18,750 from Defendant IndyMac. 62. Upon information and belief, to earn the mortgage broker compensation the broker inflated the interest rate that Plaintiffs were required to pay. 63. Under RESPA, 12 C.F.R. Section 226.4(a), , (c)(1)(iii) and (d), Defendants have enjoyed the benefits of unjust enrichment and unearned fees, as there was no separate fee agreement regarding the excessive mortgage broker compensation paid. 64. Defendants' violations resulted in damages to Plaintiffs, including all amounts paid in relation to the transaction, amounts paid in bringing this action for resolution, and any and all other statutory damages arising under RESPA, and other statutes herein pled. 65. The Defendants' violations should be used to rescind the original transaction. Furthermore, upon rescission of the original loan, the Defendants should be required to return all amounts paid under the illegal loan with reasonable interest. Failure to return the amounts paid under the predatory loan will result in unjust enrichment to Defendants.
9 COUNT V NEGLIGENCE 66. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through Defendants owed a duty to Plaintiffs to provide a loan vehicle which would not put them directly into harm's way. 68. Defendants, to satisfy this duty, should have performed a diligent and meaningful underwriting process for the origination of the Plaintiffs' loan. 69. Defendants failed to perform a diligent underwriting process in the origination of Plaintiffs' loan. 70. Defendants owed a duty to advise or notify Plaintiffs of their likelihood of defaulting on the loan, where the Defendants knew or should have know that defaulting on the loan was likely to occur. 71. Defendants breached this duty by approving the Plaintiffs for a loan which maximized the Defendants profits, violated consumer protection statutes, and was originated with no regard for the Plaintiffs. 72. Defendants breached their duties to Plaintiffs by issuing the subject loan, and have caused damages to Plaintiffs in an amount exceeding $25,000. The Defendants' negligence should be used to rescind the original transaction. Furthermore, upon rescission of the original loan, the Defendants should be required to return all amounts paid under the illegal loan with reasonable interest. Failure to return the amounts paid under the predatory loan will result in unjust enrichment to Defendants. COUNT VI UNJUST ENRICHMENT 73. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through Defendants directly benefited from the origination of a loan to Plaintiffs, which called for compensation to the Defendants either at origination or over the life of the loan. 75. Plaintiffs expected in return for the Defendants benefit a loan vehicle that was
10 accurately and thoroughly disclosed, not directly adverse to their long-term financial health, and not calculated in a manner which would lead to inevitable default. 76. The Defendants received significant compensation for issuing Plaintiffs an inequitable loan transaction which directly violated consumer protection statutes. 77. These violations are a demonstration of Defendants disregard of the principals of good faith and fair dealing. 78. As a result of the Defendants actions, Plaintiffs had a forced sale of their home. 79. Defendants retained all the benefits under the loan at the expense of Plaintiffs. 80. The Defendants' violations have directly resulted in benefits being retained by the Defendants at the expense of Plaintiffs. Defendants should be required to return all amounts paid under the illegal loan with reasonable interest. Failure to return the amounts paid under the predatory loan will result in unjust enrichment to Defendants as the benefits were obtained through violations of consumer protection laws.
11 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 81. Plaintiffs herein reassert and re-allege paragraphs 1 through Plaintiffs request the rescission of the original loan, with the return of all amounts paid under the mortgage, plus reasonable interest. 83. Plaintiffs request further, that Defendants be required to pay all costs, fees, and expenses associated with the foreclosure of the subject property, as the foreclosure was a result of the Defendants failure to properly underwrite the loan sold to Plaintiffs and the Defendants failure to properly disclose the terms of that loan. 84. Plaintiffs request further, that Defendants be required to pay all costs, fees, and expenses associated with this litigation. Respectfully Submitted: WILSON LAW GROUP, PLC JASON Q. WILSON (P59284) WILSON LAW GROUP, PLC Attorney for Plaintiffs 2000 Town Center Suite 1900 Southfield, MI (248) PROOF OF SERVICE Pursuant to MCR 2.107(D) the undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the attorneys of record of all parties to the above cause at their respective business addresses as disclosed by the pleadings of record herein on of 2010, by Hand Delivery Overnight Mail X U.S. Mail Express Mail Facsimile Further, I declare under penalty of perjury that the statement above is true to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. Joseph M. Jacoby
1. Only 20 days to file answer or other responsive pleading to summons and complaint in foreclosure action.
PREDATORY MORTGAGE LENDING FORECLOSURE DEFENSE Attorney Catherine M. Doyle Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee 521 N. 8 th Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 (414) 727-5331 cdoyle@lasmilwaukee.com I. MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE
More informationBROKER AGREEMENT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter contain, the parties agree as follows:
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into in the State of California this day of 2006, between Crestline Funding Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Crestline Funding, and, hereinafter referred to as Broker.
More informationQUICK REFERENCE GUIDE TO DISCLOSURES TRUTH IN LENDING ACT AND REGULATION Z (1) (CLOSED-END HOME MORTGAGE TRANSACTIONS)
QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE TO DISCLOSURES TRUTH IN LENDING ACT AND REGULATION Z (1) (CLOSED-END HOME MORTGAGE TRANSACTIONS) Type of (2) Contents of Truth in Lending Statements 226.17 226.36 Early s 226.19(a)(1)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Stanzer Knox, Plaintiff, vs. Homestead Mortgage Corporation, HomeComings Financial, LLC., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.,
More informationHelping Elderly Homeowners Victimized by Predatory Mortgage Loans
Helping Elderly Homeowners Victimized by Predatory Mortgage Loans Equity-rich, cash poor elderly homeowners are an attractive target for unscrupulous mortgage lenders. Many elderly homeowners are on fixed
More informationCOLORADO CONSUMER EQUITY PROTECTION ACT July 1, 2011
COLORADO CONSUMER EQUITY PROTECTION ACT July 1, 2011 Table of Contents COLORADO CONSUMER EQUITY PROTECTION ACT... 1 PART 1 OBLIGOR PROTECTION... 1 5-3.5-101. Definitions.... 1 5-3.5-102. Protection of
More information2:12-cv-13917-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN -- SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-13917-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN -- SOUTHERN DIVISION EBOREE LARKIN on behalf of herself and a class of similarly
More informationReal Estate Principles Chapter 12 Quiz
Real Estate Principles Chapter 12 Quiz 1. A prudent lender who is deciding whether or not to make a real estate loan to a prospective borrower will ensure that: A. the market value of the property is greater
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410
More informationGlossary of Lending Terms
Glossary of Lending Terms Adjustable Rate Loan or Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) A loan with an interest rate that changes during the term of the loan. The payments generally increase or decrease with
More informationReverse Mortgage Specialist
ADVISOR/LENDER APPLICANT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT This ADVISOR/LENDER APPLICANT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made this day of, 200_ by and between Oaktree Funding Corporation, a California Corporation
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 30TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT INGHAM COUNTY
STATE OF MICHIGAN CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 30TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT INGHAM COUNTY JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE No. 02-1969-CH OF MICHIGAN, AND FRANK M. FITZGERALD, COMMISSIONER OF THE
More informationAMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. KIM WALLANT and LOUIS BOREK, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, FREEDOM
More information1:12-cv-12580-TLL-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 01/11/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 545 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
1:12-cv-12580-TLL-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 01/11/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 545 DAVID SALEWSKE and SHARON SALEWSKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiffs, Case Number
More informationCONSUMER. Helping Elderly Homeowners Victimized by Predatory Mortgage Loans
CONSUMER Information for Advocates Representing Older Adults National Consumer Law Center Helping Elderly Homeowners Victimized by Predatory Mortgage Loans Equity-rich, cash poor, elderly homeowners are
More informationMORTGAGE LOAN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN PRODUCT (ONE TO FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS (RE885) INFORMATIONAL SHEET
MORTGAGE LOAN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN PRODUCT (ONE TO FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS (RE885) INFORMATIONAL SHEET WHEN TO USE THIS FORM NONTRADITIONAL LOAN PRODUCTS
More informationMEMORANDUM MORTGAGE PREQUALIFICATION VS MORTGAGE PREAPPROVAL
ATTORNEYS MICHAEL A. KUS MICHAEL J. RYAN MARSHA J. GRECO JEFFREY S. HOROWITZ ANTHONY E. VALENTINE DANA K. PEZNOWSKI OF COUNSEL JAMES C. ROSE THOMAS G. SCHLUENTZ This publication is for information purposes
More informationHow To Understand The Law Of The Landline Phone
Mortgage Lending P&P 100-Question Final Exam Answer Key 1. C 2. B 3. A 4. B 5. A 6. C 7. C 8. C 9. D 10. C 11. D 12. B 13. D 14. A 15. D 16. D 17. B 18. D 19. A 20. C 21. D 22. D 23. B 24. D 25. A 26.
More informationCh. 46 PROPER CONDUCT OF LENDING 10 46.1 CHAPTER 46. PROPER CONDUCT OF LENDING AND BROKERING IN THE MORTGAGE LOAN BUSINESS
Ch. 46 PROPER CONDUCT OF LENDING 10 46.1 CHAPTER 46. PROPER CONDUCT OF LENDING AND BROKERING IN THE MORTGAGE LOAN BUSINESS Sec. 46.1. Definitions. 46.2. Proper conduct of lending and brokering in the mortgage
More information9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA INTRODUCTION
9:10-cv-01756-MBS Date Filed 07/06/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON xxxxxxxxxxxdivision BEAUFORT ) Jonathon Rowles, individually
More informationMortgage Terms Glossary
Mortgage Terms Glossary Adjustable-Rate Mortgage (ARM) A mortgage where the interest rate is not fixed, but changes during the life of the loan in line with movements in an index rate. You may also see
More informationPlaintiffs, V. AP #01-2104. Defendants. BACKGROUND. On May 17, 2001, Penny R. Nunn (the Debtor ) filed a
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: PENNY R. NUNN, CASE NO. 01-21920 Debtors. DECISION & ORDER PENNY R. NUNN, IMC MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiffs, V. AP #01-2104 Defendants.
More informationFlorida Mortgage Laws and Regulations. Introduction. LegalEase was asked to review and summarize any legislation since January of 2007
23400 Michigan Avenue, Suite 101 Dearborn, MI 48124 Tel: 1-(866) 534-6177 (toll-free) Fax: 1-(734) 943-6051 Email: contact@legaleasesolutions.com www.legaleasesolutions.com Florida Mortgage Laws and Regulations
More informationVA Authorized Agent Agreement
VA Authorized Agent Agreement This VA Authorized Agent Agreement (the Agreement ), entered into this day of, 20 (the Effective Date ) by and between Data Mortgage Inc., d/b/a Essex Mortgage ( Lender )
More informationMORTGAGE LOAN DISCLOSURE STATEMENT GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN PRODUCT (ONE TO FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS (RE885) INFORMATIONAL SHEET
The fields in this document are filled in by Mortgage+Care Loan Origination Software. Please contact us at (800)481-2708 or www.mortcare.com for a list of mergeable documents. MORTGAGE LOAN DISCLOSURE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
ROBERT L. MITCHELL (Admitted in California) MitchellR@sec.gov LLOYD A. FARNHAM (Admitted in California) FarnhamL@sec.gov HELANE L. MORRISON (Admitted in California) 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 San
More informationThe Law of First Impressions A Practical Guide to Mortgage Applicants
The Law of First Impressions A Practical Guide to Mortgage Applicants Increased Importance of Borrower Financial Statements For Commercial Real Estate Financing Robert T. Gibney Real estate investors prepare
More informationDOCUMENT REQUEST - COMPLIANCE REVIEWS - LENDING
Please prepare the Summary of Information items. Electronic format is preferred. () to be provided Pre-Exam () - to be available upon rrival COMPLINCE REVIEWS General Provide the names, titles, e-mail
More informationMORTGAGE BROKER AGREEMENT
MORTGAGE BROKER AGREEMENT This Mortgage Broker Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between: ST. CLOUD MORTGAGE, a California Corporation (the "Lender"), and (the "Mortgage Broker") as of
More informationMORTGAGE TERMS. Assignment of Mortgage A document used to transfer ownership of a mortgage from one party to another.
MORTGAGE TERMS Acceleration Clause This is a clause used in a mortgage that can be enforced to make the entire amount of the loan and any interest due immediately. This is usually stipulated if you default
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff, v. GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. / COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
More informationCase: 3:14-cv-00152-JZ Doc #: 26 Filed: 09/18/14 1 of 8. PageID #: <pageid>
Case: 3:14-cv-00152-JZ Doc #: 26 Filed: 09/18/14 1 of 8. PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Dolores Gorsuch, Individually and on behalf
More informationDISTRICT COURT, FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO. 136 Justice Center Rd. Canon City, CO 81212 THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT, FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO 136 Justice Center Rd. Canon City, CO 81212 THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff, v. INDEPENDENCE PLANNING LLLP dba ALTERNATIVE LENDING OF COLORADO, a Colorado limited
More informationA Guide to Mortgage Products. A Glossary of Lending Terms and. True. Know Before You Go...To Get A Mortgage. False. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
A Guide to Mortgage Products A Glossary of Lending Terms and True Know Before You Go...To Get A Mortgage False or? Federal Reserve Bank of Boston The purpose of this guide is to provide general mortgage
More informationAN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; ENACTING THE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CONSULTANT FRAUD PREVENTION ACT; IMPOSING PENALTIES.
AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; ENACTING THE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE CONSULTANT FRAUD PREVENTION ACT; IMPOSING PENALTIES. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO: Section 1. SHORT TITLE.--This
More informationSelected Text of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 1681v) With a special Focus on the Impact to Mortgage Lenders
Selected Text of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 1681v) as Amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (Public Law No. 108-159) With a special Focus on the Impact to
More informationAdjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) a mortgage with a variable interest rate, which adjusts monthly, biannually or annually.
Glossary Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM) a mortgage with a variable interest rate, which adjusts monthly, biannually or annually. Amortization the way a loan is paid off over time in installments, detailing
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION WAYNE WILLIAMS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, PROTECT SECURITY, LLC. Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 of 5 7/6/2007 11:19 AM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR COMPENSATORY
More informationChapter 2d Utah High Cost Home Loan Act
Chapter 2d Utah High Cost Home Loan Act 61-2d-101 Title. This chapter is known as the "Utah High Cost Home Loan Act." 61-2d-102 Definitions. As used in this part: (1) "Accelerate" means a demand for immediate
More informationUsing the Services of a Mortgage Broker
WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW: Using the Services of a Mortgage Broker Real Estate MATTERS DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE August 2011 WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW: Using the Services of a Mortgage Broker (Revised by the DRE,
More informationBlispay Card agreement
Blispay Card agreement 1. Definitions 2. How Blispay Card works 3. Making payments 4. Fees and interest 5. When things go wrong 6. Arbitration Provision 7. Legal 8. Communications and information sharing
More informationVariable Names & Descriptions
Variable Names & Descriptions Freddie Mac provides loan-level information at PC issuance and on a monthly basis for all newly issued fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) PC securities issued after
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 100 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Attorneys for Plaintiff PLAINTIFF SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND
More informationOverview of Financial Products and Consumer Protections
Overview of Financial Products and Consumer Protections Presented by the Consumer and Mortgage Lending Division, House Financial Institutions Committee January 23, 2014 Role of the CML Division The Consumer
More informationMortgage Lending laws and how it affects you, the REALTOR. Presented by Anders Hostelley and Leonard Loventhal
Mortgage Lending laws and how it affects you, the REALTOR. Presented by Anders Hostelley and Leonard Loventhal Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act Title V of P.L. 110-289, the Secure
More informationBUSINESS CASH RESERVE AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2016
BUSINESS CASH RESERVE AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2016 This Business Cash Reserve Agreement ("Cash Reserve Agreement"), Borrower's Application for Business Cash Reserve (Business Overdraft Protection),
More informationImplications of the Federal Right of Rescission for Lenders and Borrowers
Implications of the Federal Right of Rescission for Lenders and Borrowers An Interactive Day of Building an Effective Community Response to Foreclosures in Wisconsin December 12, 2007 Disclaimer The views
More information2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County. No. CV05-045 (A)L. June 12, 2006. Second Amended Complaint
2006 WL 6142740 (Miss.Cir.) (Trial Pleading) Circuit Court of Mississippi. Lee County Charlene DUNN, Plaintiff, v. John A. MURPHY, Future Benefits, Inc. American Equity Investment Life Insurance Company,
More informationTennessee Good Funds Law (as amended)
Tennessee Good Funds Law (as amended) 47-32-101 Short Title This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Residential Closing Funds Distribution Act of 2005". 47-32-102 Chapter Definitions (1) "Agricultural
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) SHARON PETTWAY, and ) MARSHA HUBBARD ) ) individually and on behalf of all ) others similarly situated, ) ) Civil Action No. ) 03-10932-RCL Plaintiffs,
More informationILLINOIS LOAN APPROVAL NOTICE
Date: Lender: Borrower(s): Property Address: TYPE OF MORTGAGE: Purchase Refinance Fixed Rate Adjustable We are please to advise you that your application for a mortgage loan on the above-captioned property
More informationCase 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 3:08-cv-00920-JAP-JJH Document 1 Filed 02/20/2008 Page 1 of 13 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 236 Tillou Road South Orange, NJ 07079 Telephone: (973 313-1887 Fax: (973 833-0399 lrosen@rosenlegal.com
More informationCONFERENCE OF STATE BANK SUPERVISORS AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REGULATORS GUIDANCE ON NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE PRODUCT RISKS
CONFERENCE OF STATE BANK SUPERVISORS AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE REGULATORS GUIDANCE ON NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE PRODUCT RISKS I. INTRODUCTION On October 4, 2006, the Office of the Comptroller
More informationNORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY Like Clockwork. www.nat.com/cfpb
NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY Like Clockwork www.nat.com/cfpb UNDERSTANDING THE NEW LOAN ESTIMATE AND CLOSING DISCLOSURE FORMS American Title, we want to make sure all of our customers have the information
More informationAssumable mortgage: A mortgage that can be transferred from a seller to a buyer. The buyer then takes over payment of an existing loan.
MORTGAGE GLOSSARY Adjustable Rate Mortgage (ARM): A mortgage loan with payments usually lower than a fixed rate initially, but is subject to changes in interest rates. There are a variety of ARMs that
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. Defendants.
Case 1:13-cv-01817-WSD Document 1 Filed 05/30/13 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More informationCase 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-03620-D Document 1 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, Case
More informationNew Loan Origination and Mortgage Servicing Rules
5/15/ New Loan Origination and Mortgage Servicing Rules Personal Finance Seminar for Professionals University of Maryland Extension Presenter: Diane Cipollone, Esq. Director of Training National Fair Housing
More informationFirst Central Credit Union Texas Equity Questionnaire
First Central Credit Union Texas Equity Questionnaire 1. Is your property within the limits of an incorporated city? 2. Is your property a rural homestead? A homestead is rural if it is not in a city or
More informationTip Sheet. Keep in mind we are not a law firm and this is not legal advice. All advertising should be reviewed by an attorney prior to distribution.
Mortgage Acts and Practices Act (MAP) Advertising Rule (Regulation N) Tip Sheet Keep in mind we are not a law firm and this is not legal advice. All advertising should be reviewed by an attorney prior
More informationPRIVATE MORTGAGE INSURANCE DISCLOSURES AND DOCUMENTS
PRIVATE MORTGAGE INSURANCE DISCLOSURES AND DOCUMENTS By Michael H. Patterson Peirson & Patterson, L.L.P. 1111 W. Arkansas Lane Arlington, Texas 76013 (817) 461-5500 mike@ppdocs.com Presented to Independent
More informationFILED THE HONORABLE MARY YU HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
FILED AUG PM 1: THE HONORABLE MARY YU HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER KING COUNTY, SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: ---1 SEA 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
More informationTitle 9-A: MAINE CONSUMER CREDIT CODE
Maine Revised Statutes Title 9-A: MAINE CONSUMER CREDIT CODE Article : 8-506. ENHANCED RESTRICTIONS ON CERTAIN CREDITORS In addition to the compliance requirements of section 8-504, subsection 1, unless
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF
............... Attorneys for Estate Representative SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF Estate of CASE NO... WAIVER OF ACCOUNTING AND PETITION.., FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION; STATUTORY
More informationv. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE
Present: All the Justices SETTLEMENT FUNDING, LLC v. Record No. 061373 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 8, 2007 CARLA VON NEUMANN-LILLIE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY M. Langhorne Keith,
More informationTerms of Business. Regulated Activities Our principal business is mortgage lending and this activity is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.
Terms of Business Provided in accordance with the Consumer Protection Code 2012 issued by the Central Bank of Ireland and can be found on the Central Bank s website www.centralbank.ie About Us Our legal
More informationCFPB s RESPA TILA Integrated Disclosure. Finley P. Maxson NAR Senior Counsel fmaxson@realtors.org (312) 329-8381
CFPB s RESPA TILA Integrated Disclosure Finley P. Maxson NAR Senior Counsel fmaxson@realtors.org (312) 329-8381 RESPA-TILA Integrated Disclosure A. Background I. Impetus for change a. Dodd-Frank directed
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, Court File No. 12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM INTRODUCTION
CASE 0:12-cv-01236-RHK-JSM Document 50 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Bryana Bible, SECOND AMENDED CLASS Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationALTERATIONS, MODIFICATIONS OR AMENDMENTS ARE ACCEPTED TO THIS AGREEMENT.
TPO Approval Checklist For Business Purpose Loans ***(This Broker Package is for Brokers who will only be Brokering Commercial Real Estate Loans or Residential Business Purpose Loans)*** NO ALTERATIONS,
More informationOutstanding mortgage balance
Using Home Equity There are numerous benefits to owning your own home. Not only does it provide a place to live, where you can decorate as you want, but it also provides a source of wealth. Over time,
More informationCase 15-02065 Doc 1 Filed 04/07/15 Entered 04/07/15 11:42:31 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Document Page 1 of 13 George Hoffman (10005) Benjamin J. Kotter (9592) Adam H. Reiser (13339) COHNE KINGHORN, P.C. 111 East Broadway, 11 th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 363-4300 Facsimile:
More informationWelcome. 1. Agenda. 2. Ground Rules. 3. Introductions. Your Own Home 2
Your Own Home Welcome 1. Agenda 2. Ground Rules 3. Introductions Your Own Home 2 Objectives If you are a pre-homebuyer: Explain the advantages and disadvantages of renting versus owning a home Identify
More informationKentucky Housing Corporation Closing Agent Agreement
Kentucky Housing Corporation Closing Agent Agreement Kentucky Housing Corporation ( KHC ) has established required standards of performance and conduct for any closing agent ( Closing Agent ) conducting
More informationCONSULTING SERVICES and CONTRACT LABOR AGREEMENT
CONSULTING SERVICES and CONTRACT LABOR AGREEMENT This Consulting Services and Contract Labor Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of the day of, 20 (the Effective Date ) by and between Volkswagen
More informationWHAT TO DO WHEN YOU CAN'T PAY YOUR BILLS: MANAGING YOR DEBT
This material is provided to answer general questions about the law in New York State. The information and forms were created to assist readers with general issues and not specific situations, and, as
More informationDODD FRANK ACT UPDATE SELLER FINANCING RESTRICTIONS & EXCEPTIONS
DODD FRANK ACT UPDATE SELLER FINANCING RESTRICTIONS & EXCEPTIONS By: Attorney Kevin F. Jursinski, B.C.S. September 2015 This Article will update revisions to the Dodd Frank Act and the previous Article
More informationMLO COMPENSATION, REGULATION Z, AND DODD-FRANK ACT
MLO COMPENSATION, REGULATION Z, AND DODD-FRANK ACT Vermont Mortgage Bankers Association & Mortgage Bankers/Brokers Association of NH Mortgage Compliance Conference Thursday, March 3, 2011 Sean P. Mahoney
More informationHomeowners Protection Act. I. Background
Homeowners Protection Act I. Background The Homeowners Protection Act of 1998 (the Act) was signed into law on July 29, 1998, and became effective on July 29, 1999. The Act was amended on December 27,
More informationThe Adjustable Rate Loan, the Graduated Payment Loan, and Other Loan Arrangements
Chapter 43 The Adjustable Rate Loan, the Graduated Payment Loan, and Other Loan Arrangements INTRODUCTION When interest rates are generally stable from year to year, the fixed-rate amortized loan works
More informationLesson 13: Applying for a Mortgage Loan
1 Real Estate Principles of Georgia Lesson 13: Applying for a Mortgage Loan 2 Choosing a Lender Types of lenders Types of lenders include: savings and loans commercial banks savings banks credit unions
More informationExamination Procedures Mortgage Origination
These Examination Procedures ( Procedures ) consist of modules covering the various elements of the mortgage origination process; each module identifies specific matters for review. Examiners will use
More informationSECURED DEMAND NOTE COLLATERAL AGREEMENT
SECURED DEMAND NOTE COLLATERAL AGREEMENT This Secured Demand Note Collateral Agreement (the "Agreement") is effective as of the day of, 20 by and between the "Lender") and (the "Borrower"), who mutually
More informationUncertainty Regarding Fed Proposal and CFPB Action on Minimum Underwriting Standards for Consideration of a Consumer s Ability to Repay
June 2011 Uncertainty Regarding Fed Proposal and CFPB Action on Minimum Underwriting Standards for Consideration of a Consumer s Ability to Repay BY KEVIN L. PETRASIC, HELEN Y. LEE & AMANDA M. JABOUR Comments
More informationAssembly Bill No. 344 CHAPTER 733
Assembly Bill No. 344 CHAPTER 733 An act to amend Sections 4970, 4973, 4974, 4975, 4977, 4978, 4978.6, 4979, and 4979.7 of the Financial Code, as added by Assembly Bill 489 of the 2001-02 Regular Session,
More information(Space Above This Line For Recording Data) SECOND MORTGAGE
This document was prepared by: When recorded, please return to: Illinois Housing Development Authority 401 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 700 Chicago, IL 60611 Attn: Home Ownership Programs (Space Above This
More informationATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES
109 N. Palafox Street Telephone (850) 434-8904 Pensacola, Florida 32502 Fax (850) 434-8922 ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES THIS FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES ("Contract")
More information4 HOUR NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE TYPES
NMLS Approved Provider ID 1400051 353 West 48th St, Suite 333, New York, NY 10036 4 HOUR NONTRADITIONAL MORTGAGE TYPES Course Approval: 1156/1008/1699 Course Material Date: 10/26/2015 Course Approval Date:
More informationChapter 9 6/16/2010. Two Elements of a Mortgage Loan
Some Effects of Mortgage Debt McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 9 Real Estate Finance: The Laws and Contracts 9-1 Copyright 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. More households can own
More informationAdvantage Education Loan Promissory Note
Promissory Note with Kentucky Higher Education Student Loan Corporation in Louisville, KY In this Promissory Note ( Note ) the words I, me, my, and we mean the borrower and cosigner(s) who have signed
More informationMortgage Fraud. Table of Contents. Home Equity Scams Choosing a Loan Home Equity Dos Home Equity Don ts
Mortgage Fraud Table of Contents Home Equity Scams Choosing a Loan Home Equity Dos Home Equity Don ts Reverse Mortgages Home Loan Law HOEPA Prevents For more information on Mortgage Fraud visit: You could
More information1/22/2013. Mortgage U, Inc. Copyright 2012 Mortgage U, Inc. Copyright 2012 Mortgage U, Inc. Copyright 2012 Mortgage U, Inc.
Mortgage U, Inc Compliance Is A New World Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Qualified Mortgage QM final rule Points and fees amendment High Cost Mortgage Rules High Cost Appraisal Rules ECOA & HMDA
More informationCase 2:14-cv-00244 Document 1 Filed 02/19/14 Page 1 of 9
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DR. A. CEMAL EKIN, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCONSUMER MORTGAGE PROTECTION ACT Act 660 of 2002. The People of the State of Michigan enact:
CONSUMER MORTGAGE PROTECTION ACT Act 660 of 2002 AN ACT to prohibit certain lending practices; to require disclosure of certain information for home loans; to prescribe certain duties and obligations of
More informationPRE-FORECLOSURE SALE ADDENDUM (FHA-Insured Loan)
PRE-FORECLOSURE SALE ADDENDUM (FHA-Insured Loan) Borrower: Loan Number: Address of Property: Date of Purchase Contract: / / Please type or print the following information: Seller Name Buyer Name Seller
More informationHOUSE BILL No. 2235. AN ACT regulating vehicle title loans.
Session of 0 HOUSE BILL No. By Committee on Commerce and Economic Development - 0 0 AN ACT regulating vehicle title loans. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section. (a) Except as
More informationHOUSE BILL 2242 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 6, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING CHAPTER 16; RELATING TO REVERSE MORTGAGES.
Senate Engrossed House Bill State of Arizona House of Representatives Forty-ninth Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING CHAPTER ; RELATING
More informationMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Revised 9/19/2013 MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT In consideration of the covenants herein contained (hereinafter called "Owner") and Rudulph Real Estate, Inc. (hereinafter called "Agent"), agree as follows: 1. EMPLOYMENT:
More informationESCROW ACCOUNT OPTION NOTICE TO BORROWER
ESCROW ACCOUNT OPTION NOTICE TO BORROWER The mortgage interest rate and discount points agreement which you are entering into with Mission Mortgage is based on the assumption that you will be making monthly
More information