Cloud Broker for Reputation-Enhanced and QoS based IaaS Service Selection
|
|
- Emil Dennis
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Communication, Network, and Computing, CNC Cloud Broker for Reputation-Enhanced and QoS based IaaS Service Selection Ruby Annette.J 1, Dr. Aisha Banu.W 2 and Dr.Sriram 3 1 B.S Abdur Rahman University, Chennai, India rubysubash2010@gmail.com 2 B.S Abdur Rahman University, Chennai, India {aisha, sriram}@bsauniv.ac.in Abstract Cloud brokering service is gaining momentum as a promising area of research and business opportunity. As cloud computing enables the user to obtain the infrastructure, platform and software required as a service, there is no need to invest huge amount as the capital to run the business and hence more and more companies are moving to the cloud. But collecting the information from the multiple cloud service providers and comparing the various services in order to zero down the right service provider is a time consuming task given the plethora and the variety of cloud service offerings. As many cloud service providers are entering the market, the users look for the cloud brokers who could help them in the dynamic selection and aggregation of services based on their Quality of Service (QoS) requirements and the cost. The other important aspects considered by the users while selecting the service provider is their reputation. This paper introduces a Cloud Broker Service (CBS) framework that facilitates the dynamic selection of the IaaS service providers based on the QoS requirements, cost and the reputation of the service providers. The proposed CBS framework provides a ranking mechanism that evaluates the services offered by the various IaaS service providers like Amazon EC2, Rackspace etc., for various Quality of Service requirements based on the Service Measurement Index (SMI) and the reputation of the company. The evaluation of the services using the Service Measurement Index proposed by CSMIC (Cloud Service Measurement Index Consortium) to identify the various measurement indexes that are important for evaluating a cloud service enables to zero down the right service provider who could satisfy the user s requirements. The applicability of the ranking algorithm and the cloud broker frame work is shown using a case study. Index Terms Cloud Broker Service, Service Measurement Index (SMI), Reputation, IaaS Services Ranking Algorithm. I. INTRODUCTION Elasticity is the beauty of the cloud computing paradigm. Cloud computing enables the user to scale-up or scale-down the resources utilization as per the requirement of the hour. Thus, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) no longer have to invest large capital in hardware to deploy their services, since the additional resources required can be acquired from the public cloud providers on demand. Though, there are a lot of Elsevier, 2014
2 advantages in terms of CPEX ( Capital Expenditure) converted to OPEX (Operating Expenses), one of the main challenges faced by the SME s is to select the right service provider who can fulfill their QoS requirements at minimum cost. Dealing with a cloud service provider requires knowledge of its operating environment, security levels, data recovery approaches, and the service terms and conditions. Collecting these information for multiple cloud service providers is not an easy task for service consumers given the plethora and the variety of cloud services offerings. Thus, Cloud service brokers (CSBs) play a vital role in helping the SME s identify the right service providers. The National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST), identifies the Cloud Broker as the actor which is in charge of service intermediation, service aggregation, and service arbitrage in its Cloud Computing Reference Model [1], [2]. According to Gartner [3], "The future of cloud computing will be permeated with the notion of brokers negotiating relationships between providers of cloud services and the service customers. In this context, a broker might be a software, appliances, platforms or suites of technologies that enhance the base services available through the cloud. Enhancement will include managing access to these services, providing greater security or even creating completely new services, ". Thus, Cloud service brokers (CSBs) are the entities that act in between the user and the service providers to provide their expertise and other value-added services like SLA negotiation process, monitoring and assessing the implementation of SLAs to assist the service consumers [4]. Various works have been carried out to enable service consumers to compare the cloud services being offered. For example, the Service Measurement Index (SMI) proposed by the Cloud Service Measurement Index Consortium (CSMIC)[5] identifies the various measurement indexes that are important for evaluating a Cloud service. These measurement indexes can be used by customers to compare different Cloud services. Other examples include, the Cloudstone [6] which is a multi-platform, multi-language benchmark and measurement tools for web 2.0, Cloudharmony [7] and the CloudCmp [8]. S. K. Garg, et al [9] proposed a frame work for ranking the cloud services named the SMICloud. The SMICloud enables the users to compare different Cloud offerings along several dimensions, priorities and select the services that are appropriate to their needs. But the reputation of the service providers is not considered during the selection of services in the SMICloud. Reputation is the public s opinion about the character or standing (such as honesty, capability, reliability) of an entity, which could be a person, an agent, a product or a service. It is objective and represents a collective evaluation of a group of people/agents. The reputation based service discovery is a widely explored topic in web services discovery [10], [11], [12],[17]. The Cloud Broker framework proposed in this work enables the cloud service users to select the right service provider based on the QoS requirements and reputation. The Service Measurement Index (SMI) is used for comparing the QoS requirements of users and the services offered by the various cloud service providers. The reputation of the cloud service providers is calculated using the consumer s feedback. The proposed service matching, ranking and selection algorithm is used to select the prospective service providers who s services adhere to the QoS requirements of the users. The customer is given the option to select a service provider based on the dominant QoS requirement and reputation or to service that offers a better QoS/Cost ratio.the service matching, ranking and selection algorithm are based on a matching algorithm proposed by Ziqiang Xu et al [13], Rajendran et al [14]. However, since it is framed for the selection of the web services, it doesn t address various other unique criteria in cloud like elasticity, VM size etc, and is different from this proposed work. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: The next session presents an overview of the proposed cloud broker framework. This session also explains in detail the algorithm used for ranking the services and the calculation of reputation of the service providers. In Section 3, the case study is explored in detail to determine the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. A detailed discussion on the results obtained for the various kinds of user requirements and the services selected accordingly is given in section 4. The conclusion and the future work are given in section 5. II. CLOUD BROKER FRAMEWORK In the proposed Cloud Broker Framework, the user selects the SMI attributes which are the QoS requirements of the users that are to be met by the cloud service providers. The SMI attributes are designed based on International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards by the Consortium [5]. It consists of a set of business-relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPI s) that provide a standardized method for measuring and comparing a business service. The advantage of using the SMI attributes is that, they provide a holistic view of QoS needed by the customers for selecting a Cloud service provider based on various 816
3 measures like the Accountability, Agility, Assurance of Service, Cost, Performance, Security and Privacy, and Usability. The SMI attribute selected by the users are called the Key Performance Indicators (KPI s). In the proposed cloud broker framework, the SMI Calculator/Evaluator daemon evaluates the services of the various cloud service providers based on the KPI s chosen by the user and selects the prospective service providers. Once the service providers are evaluated in the SMI evaluator, the QoS based ranking system ranks the potential service providers based on the KPI s of the users and provides the LS1. The proposed Cloud Broker Framework is given in the figure 1. Figure 1 Cloud Broker Framework The Reputation manager in the cloud broker framework estimates the reputation of the service provider using the feedback of the consumer s who have already used the cloud services from the providers. The feedback from the users are collected and stored in a database and the reputation manager uses the information in the database to calculate the reputation of each service provider and creates a ranking list LS2 of the service providers based on their reputation. The service selector daemon in the cloud broker framework provides the choice to the customer to select the service provider based on only the QoS ranking and reputation or the Quality to Cost ratio. The Quality to Cost ratio enables the user to select the service provider who provides the best service for the amount paid. The data flow diagram of the proposed frame work is given in figure 2. Figure 2 Data Flow Diagram of the Cloud Broker Framework 817
4 A. SMI calculator/estimator As discussed earlier, the SMI attributes provides a holistic view of QoS needed by the customers for selecting a Cloud service provider based on: Accountability, Agility, Assurance of Service, Cost, Performance, Security and Privacy. Accountability it is used to measure various Cloud providers specific characteristics. This is important to build the trust of a customer on any Cloud provider. Agility Agility in SMI is measured as a rate of change metric like elasticity, flexibility and adaptability. Elasticity in turn is the scalability of the resources during the peak time which is defined by two attributes: mean time taken to expand or contract the service capacity, and maximum capacity of service. The capacity is the maximum number of compute unit which can be provided at peak times. Cost Cost depends on two attributes: acquisition and on-going. It is not easy to compare different prices of services as they offer different features and thus have many dimensions thus the approach used in the SMI Cloud Framework [9] is used in this work to calculate the cost as a volume based metric. i.e. the cost of one unit of CPU, storage, RAM, and network bandwidth. Therefore, if a VM is priced at p for cpu cpu units, net network, data data, RAM for RAM, then the cost of the VM is Where a, b, c, and d are weights for each resource attribute and a + b + c + d = 1. The weight of each attribute can vary from application to application. Generally users need to transfer data which also incurs cost. Therefore, the total on-going cost can be calculated as the sum of data communication, storage and compute usage for that particular Cloud provider and service. Performance Performance is measured in terms of functionality, service response time in the cloud computing environment. The efficiency of service availability can be measured in terms of the response time. The service response time depends on various sub-factors such as average response time, maximum response time promised by the service provider, and the percentage of time this response time level is missed. Average Response Time is given by, Σ i T i /n Where T i is time between when user i requested for an IaaS service and when it is actually available and n is the total number of IaaS service requests. Maximum Response Time is the maximum promised response time by the Cloud provider for the service. Response Time Failure is given by the percentage of occasions when the response time was higher than the promised maximum response time. Assurance it indicates the likelihood of a Cloud service performing as expected or promised in the SLA. Reliability, availability and service stability are important factors in selecting Cloud services. Availability is the percentage of time a customer can access the service. It is given by: (Total service time) (Total time for which service was not available) / Total service time Security and Privacy data protection and privacy are important includes many attributes such as protecting confidentiality and privacy, data integrity and availability. The SMI Evaluator estimates the values of the KPI s selected by the user from the above mentioned SMI attributes for the various service providers. The QoS based ranking daemon uses this estimation to rank the service providers based on the QoS requirements of the users. B. QoS based Ranking System The QoS based ranking system in the cloud broker lets the user to select any one of the SMI attributes like Accountability, Agility, Assurance of Service, Cost, Performance, Security and Privacy as the dominant QoS attribute and the reputation score based on which the services have to be ranked. If customer specifies none, then the Average response time is considered as the default dominant QoS attribute. This type of ranking based one dominant QoS attribute is more convenient and realistic for the users as the user has to just decide upon just one QoS attribute instead of giving separate weights for all various QoS attributes. The calculation of QoS scores of services is performed based on the equation given below, 818
5 where QoSScorei is the QoS score of service i, i being the position of the service in the list of matched services, DominantQoSi is the value of the dominant QoS attribute of service i, BestDominantQoS is the highest or lowest value of the dominant QoS of the matched services when the dominant attribute is monotonically increasing or decreasing, respectively. A monotonically increasing QoS attribute means increases in the value reflects improvements in the quality, while monotonically decreasing means decreases in the value reflects improvements in the quality. After the broker receives the KPI s from the user, it contacts the SMI calculator or estimator to find services that match the customer s functional requirements, and retrieves their QoS information. The broker then uses the service matching, ranking and selection algorithm described in the service selector section to select the top M services (M is specified by the customer in the discovery request) to return to the customer. If the user specifies only the QoS requirements based ranking, the ranking is done based on the calculated QoSScorei, according to the formulae given above and the service providers list is stored in LS1. If no service is found, the broker returns an empty result to the customer. C. Reputation manager The reputation manager collects and processes service ratings from consumers and stores the service reputation scores in a RatingDatabase (Rating DB), and provides the scores when requested by the service selector. The reputation manager collects feedback regarding the QoS of the cloud services from the service consumers, calculates reputation scores, and updates these scores in the Rating DB. For this work, we assume that all ratings are available, objective and valid. Service consumers provide a rating indicating the level of satisfaction with a service after each interaction with the service. A rating is simply an integer ranging from 1 to 10, where 10 means extreme satisfaction and 1 means extreme dissatisfaction. Our service rating storage system is similar to the one proposed by Ziqiang Xu et al. [13]. A local database contains the reputation information which consists of service ID, consumer ID, rating value and a timestamp. Only the most recent rating by a customer for a service is stored in the table. New ratings from the same customers for the same service replace older ratings. The timestamp is used to determine the aging factor of a particular service rating. The reputation score (U) of a service is computed as the weighted average of all ratings the service receives from customers, where: N is the number of ratings for the service, Si is the ith service rating, λ is the inclusion factor, 0 < λ < 1, di is the age of the ith service rating in days. The inclusion factor λ is used to adjust the responsiveness of the reputation score to the changes in service activity. A smaller λ means that the more recent ratings have a larger impact on the reputation score and a larger λ means more of the ratings affect the score. Reputation is built from the aggregation of consumer ratings of a service based on historic transaction records. New services with no reputation are endorsed by trustworthy service providers or consumers before their reputation is established. D. The Service Selector The Service selector enables the customer to specify the request criteria. The service consumer has the choice to specify only QoS requirements in the request, or both QoS and reputation requirements. The Service 819
6 selector uses the services matching, ranking and selection algorithm to select the appropriate service provider. The services matching, ranking and selection algorithm proposed is given below in Figure 3. Figure: 3 Services Matching, Ranking and Selection Algorithm When the broker receives a request, it executes find services (line1) to identify the services that meet the QoS or the KPI requirements. If KPI requirements are specified, KPIMatch (line 3) is executed next on the set of services and it returns a subset of services LS1 that meet the KPI requirements. selectservices(line 5) always returns a list of M services to the customer where M denotes the maximum number of services to be returned. If KPI requirements are not specified, selectservices returns M randomly selected services. If only one service satisfies the selection criteria, it returns this service to the customer. In case, no reputation requirement is specified, qosrank (line 10) calculates QoS scores of the services and returns a list of services LS1 where the services are sorted in descending order based on their QoS scores only. The QoS score is calculated in the range of 0 to 1 for each service based on the dominantqos attribute value. The service with the bestdominant QoS value is assigned a score of 1. From LS3, selectservices (line 12) returns the top M services to the customer. If M is not specified, one service is randomly selected and returned from LS3 whose QoS score is greater than the user-specified thresholdlowlimit. For example, if LowLimit is 0.9, it means all services whose QoS score is greater than 0.9 will be considered in the random selection. The random selection prevents the service with the highest QoS score from always being selected, and thus helps to balance the workload among the services that provide the same functionality and similar QoS. In the case where a reputation requirement is specified, reputationrank (line 7) calculates reputation scores of the services and returns a filtered list of services LS2 containing only those services that have a reputation score equal to or above the specified required value. E. QoS /cost ratio As cost is one of the major criteria to be considered for selecting a service, the service consumer is given a QoS / Cost ratio based ranking of the service providers. The QoS / Cost ratio helps to filter the service providers who provide a better Quality of Service for a much less price than their competitors. The list LS4 gives the set of services ranked based on the QoS/ Cost ratio. III. CASE STUDY In this section, we present a case study example of the ranking mechanism presented in the previous section. The QoS data is collected from various evaluation studies for three IaaS Cloud providers: Amazon EC2 (S1), Windows Azure (S2), and Rackspace (S3) [8],[15],[16]. The unavailable data such as security level is 820
7 randomly assigned to each Cloud service. User weights are also randomly assigned to each QoS service attribute. The top level QoS groups are Accountability, Agility, Assurance, Cost, Performance and Security, Reputation. The reputation score is obtained from the reputation manager. The Table 1 gives the attributes and the values used in the case study for the above mentioned SMI attributes. The users are requested to select their required KPI s from these SMI attributes and the potential service providers are identified by the SMI Evaluator. TABLE I. ATTRIBUTES AND VALUES USED IN CASE STUDY TABLE II. CONSUMER / USER REQUIREMENTS The Table 2 gives the details of the user requirements (KPI s) selected by the users. The customer is assigned a customer id and is requested to select the dominant QoS attribute desired by the user from the SMI attributes given in the table 1 and the reputation level are also obtained from the user. The values for each KPI s given by the user is matched with the SMI attribute values evaluated for service provider in the SMI Evaluator and the reputation manager. The potential service providers are selected based on the results obtained from the IaaS services matching, ranking and selection algorithm as explained in the previous section. Figure: 4 Service Response Time of the Cloud Service Providers 821
8 Figure: 5 Upload Time of the Cloud Service Providers Figure: 6 Elasticity of the Cloud Service Providers Figure: 7 Security of the Cloud Service Providers Figure: 8 Reputation of the Cloud Service Providers 822
9 Figure: 9 Quality/ Cost ratio of the Cloud Service Providers The graphs given above, gives the SMI attributes evaluated in the SMI evaluator for the three service providers considered in the case study namely: Amazon EC2 (S1), Windows Azure (S2), and Rackspace (S3). Some examples of the SMI attributes evaluated in the SMI evaluator are: The service response time (Fig: 4), Upload time (Fig: 5), Elasticity (Fig: 6), Security (Fig: 7), Reputation (Fig: 8) and the Quality/Cost ratio (Fig: 9). The services that best match the QoS requirements of the user get a score of one. A comparison of the service response time of the three service providers considered is given in the graph (Fig: 4) and it could be clearly seen that the Rackspace (S3) offers a better service response time compared to Amazon EC2 (S1) and Windows Azure (S2). Whereas Amazon EC2 (S1) offers the least upload time and is faster than the other two service providers. From figure 6, one can conclude that Amazon EC2 (S1) is not only faster but also has high elasticity than Windows Azure (S2) and Rackspace (S3). Thus the users who require high speed and elasticity will prefer Amazon EC2 (S1) than the other two services. But the users who insist on the security than speed and elasticity would prefer Windows Azure (S2), since the security level is high in Windows Azure (S2) according to the (Fig: 7). Figure 8, gives a comparison of the reputation of the three service providers. Both Windows Azure (S2) and Rackspace (S3) score high in reputation than Amazon EC2 (S1). Note that Windows Azure (S2) scores high in both security and reputation. The Quality / Cost ratio helps the user to identify the service provider who gives the best value for money. From figure 9, it could be seen clearly that Rackspace (S3) has the highest Quality/ Cost ratio compared to Amazon EC2 (S1) and Windows Azure (S2). To conclude, the service provider with less service response time is S3 and the service that does not take much time to upload the files and hence with good speed is S1. Further it could also be clearly seen that the service with high scalability / elasticity is S1 and that with high security is S2. Both S2 and S3 have high reputation scores and S3 has the highest Quality/ Cost ratio. The discussion about the various QoS requirements given by the users and the services matching, ranking and selection process according to the proposed algorithm is given briefly in the next session. IV. DISCUSSION Based on the service consumers requirements given in the Table 2 and the QoS, Reputation and the Quality/ Cost ratio computations given in the graphs above, the services that would be selected for each customer are determined as follows: Since the Customer C1 has not mentioned any Dominant QoS and Reputation value, all the service providers namely S1, S2, S3 will be selected and the user will be given the option to select any of the three services providers. The Customer C2 has the Dominant QoS value as Cost and no preference for Reputation value. Hence, S1 service provider with the least cost and the S3 service provider who provides a better ratio of Quality to Cost will be promising candidates. Here the user is given the option to between the S1 least cost or S3 who provides a better ratio of Quality to Cost. The Dominant QoS and Reputation value of the Customer C3 are Performance and 8. Thus, The S3 service provider will be selected for C3. C4 has the Elasticity as the dominant QoS but no reputation preferences; hence, S1 and S3 are ideal services. The last customer C5 wants performance and the service provider with a reputation value of 9, thus S3 service provider will be selected for C5. 823
10 V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK Cloud computing has become an important paradigm for acquiring the required resources on demand. Currently, many Cloud providers offer different Cloud services with different QoS and SLAs. To find out the best Cloud services is the biggest challenge faced by Cloud customers. The comparison of the various cloud service providers based on certain QoS parameters is a time consuming job and the users should be able to compare them dynamically, according to the changing QoS demands to be met by them. One of the important step towards this is the SMI framework proposed by the Cloud Service Measurement Index Consortium (CSMIC). The aim of this consortium is to define each of QoS attributes given in the framework and provide a methodology for computing a relative index for comparing different Cloud services. In this context, this work presents the cloud broker framework, to systematically measure all the QoS attributes proposed by CSMIC and rank the Cloud services based on these attributes. We proposed an service matching, ranking and selection mechanism which can evaluate the Cloud services based on different applications depending on QoS requirements. Our proposed mechanism also addresses the challenge of evaluating the reputation of the service providers and thus enables the user to select the service provider based on three different requirements namely: Dominant QoS requirements only, Dominant QoS requirements and reputation and Quality / Cost ratio. According to Gartner, the Cloud Brokering Services (CBS) is a booming business and efficient services ranking, selection algorithms and value added services that could bring about new dimensions in providing the services is the need of the hour. The proposed cloud broker frame work is one of the initiatives in that line of thought. In the future we have planned to enhance the framework for various other value added services like auditing, security etc. REFERENCES [1] R. Bohn, J. Messina, F. Liu, and J. Tong, NIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture, InProc. Of the 2011 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES 2011), pp , [2] P. Mell and T. Grance, "The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing," National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication , [3] Gartner, "Gartner Says Cloud Consumers Need Brokerages to Unlock the Potential of CloudServices," [4] R. Buyya, C. Yeo, S. Venugopal, J. Broberg, I. Brandic, Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility, Future Generation Computer Systems, [5] Cloud Service Measurement Index Consortium (CSMIC), SMI framework. servicemeasurementinex. [6] W. Sobel, S. Subramanyam, A. Sucharitakul, J. Nguyen, H. Wong, S. Patil, A.Fox, D. Patterson, Cloudstone: multiplatform, multi-language benchmark and measurement tools for web 2.0, in: Proceedings of Cloud Computing and its Application, Chicago, USA, [7] C. Harmony, Cloudharmony.com, February 2012., [8] A.Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, M. Zhang, CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers, in: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Internet Measurement, Melbourne, Australia, [9] S. K. Garg, et al., "Smicloud: A framework for comparing and ranking cloud services," In proc. Of the 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), pp , [10] Majithia, S., Shaikhali, A., Rana, O., and Walker, D.(2004). Reputation-based Semantic Service Discovery. InProc. Of the 13th IEEE Intl. Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), pp , Modena, Italy. [11] Maximilien, E.M. & Singh, M.P. (2002). Reputation and Endorsement for Web Services. ACM SIGecomExchanges, Vol. 3(1), pp [12] Wishart, R., Robinson, R., Indulska, J., and Josang, A.(2005). SuperstringRep: Reputation-enhanced Service Discovery. In Proc. of the 28th Australasian conf. on Computer Science, Vol. 38, pp [13] Ziqiang Xu, Patrick Martin, Wendy Powley and Farhana Zulkernine, Reputation-Enhanced QoS-based Web Services Discovery.In ICWS, pages , 2007 [14] Rajendran Thangavel and Balasubramanie Palanisamy, (2009). Efficient Approach towards an Agent-Based Dynamic Web Service Discovery Framework with QoS Support. International Symposium on Computing, Communication, and Control, Proc. Of CSIT Vol.1 (2011) Singapore. [15] J. Schad, J. Dittrich, J. Quiane-Ruiz, Runtime measurements in the cloud: observing, analyzing, and reducing variance, Proceedings of the VLDBEndowment vol. 3, no.1-2, pp , 2010 [16] A. Iosup, N. Yigitbasi, D. Epema, on the performance variability of production cloud services, in: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud, and Grid Computing, CA, USA, [17] Vu, L., Hauswirth, M., and Aberer, K. (2005). QoS based service selection and ranking with trust and reputation management. In Proc. of the Intl. conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), Agia Napa, Cyprus. 824
RANKING THE CLOUD SERVICES BASED ON QOS PARAMETERS
RANKING THE CLOUD SERVICES BASED ON QOS PARAMETERS M. Geetha 1, K. K. Kanagamathanmohan 2, Dr. C. Kumar Charlie Paul 3 Department of Computer Science, Anna University Chennai. A.S.L Paul s College of Engineering
More informationSMICloud: A Framework for Comparing and Ranking Cloud Services
2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing SMICloud: A Framework for Comparing and Ranking Cloud Services Saurabh Kumar Garg, Steve Versteeg and Rajkumar Buyya Cloud Computing
More informationK.Niha, Dr. W.Aisha Banu, Ruby Anette
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 4, April-2015 41 A Cloud Service Providers Ranking System Using Ontology K.Niha, Dr. W.Aisha Banu, Ruby Anette Abstract Cloud
More informationA Proposed Framework for Ranking and Reservation of Cloud Services Based on Quality of Service
II,III A Proposed Framework for Ranking and Reservation of Cloud Services Based on Quality of Service I Samir.m.zaid, II Hazem.m.elbakry, III Islam.m.abdelhady I Dept. of Geology, Faculty of Sciences,
More informationAn Efficient WS-QoS Broker Based Architecture for Web Services Selection
An Efficient WS-QoS Broker Based Architecture for Web Services Selection T.Rajendran AP cum Research Scholar Department of CSE SNS College of Technology Dr.P.Balasubramanie Professor Department of CSE
More informationA Cloud Service Measure Index Framework to Evaluate Efficient Candidate with Ranked Technology
A Cloud Service Measure Index Framework to Evaluate Efficient Candidate with Ranked Technology Shruthi Shirur 1, Annappa Swamy D. R. 2 1 M. Tech, CSE Department, Mangalore Institute of Technology & Engineering
More informationFuture Generation Computer Systems
Future Generation Computer Systems 29 (2013) 1012 1023 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Future Generation Computer Systems journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fgcs A framework for
More informationFEDERATED CLOUD: A DEVELOPMENT IN CLOUD COMPUTING AND A SOLUTION TO EDUCATIONAL NEEDS
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Applications, Volume VIII, Issue II, November 14 FEDERATED CLOUD: A DEVELOPMENT IN CLOUD COMPUTING AND A SOLUTION TO EDUCATIONAL NEEDS Saju Mathew 1, Dr.
More informationRANKING OF CLOUD SERVICE PROVIDERS IN CLOUD
RANKING OF CLOUD SERVICE PROVIDERS IN CLOUD C.S. RAJARAJESWARI, M. ARAMUDHAN Research Scholar, Bharathiyar University,Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Assoc. Professor, Department of IT, PKIET, Karaikal,
More informationOptimal Service Pricing for a Cloud Cache
Optimal Service Pricing for a Cloud Cache K.SRAVANTHI Department of Computer Science & Engineering (M.Tech.) Sindura College of Engineering and Technology Ramagundam,Telangana G.LAKSHMI Asst. Professor,
More informationAn Effective Approach To Find a Best Cloud Service Provider Using Ranked Voting Method
An Effective Approach To Find a Best Cloud Service Provider Using Ranked Voting Method Vidyashree C.N M.Tech, Dept of CSE PESCE, Mandya vidyashreec.n57@gmail.com V Chetan Kumar Asst.Prof, Dept of CSE PESCE,
More informationSLA BASED SERVICE BROKERING IN INTERCLOUD ENVIRONMENTS
SLA BASED SERVICE BROKERING IN INTERCLOUD ENVIRONMENTS Foued Jrad, Jie Tao and Achim Streit Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany {foued.jrad, jie.tao, achim.streit}@kit.edu
More informationPERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PaaS CLOUD COMPUTING SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF PaaS CLOUD COMPUTING SYSTEM Akmal Basha 1 Krishna Sagar 2 1 PG Student,Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, India. 2 Associate
More informationAn enhanced QoS Architecture based Framework for Ranking of Cloud Services
An enhanced QoS Architecture based Framework for Ranking of Cloud Services Mr.K.Saravanan #1, M.Lakshmi Kantham #2 1 Assistant Professor, 2 PG Scholar Department of Computer Science and Engineering Anna
More informationHow To Understand Cloud Usability
Published in proceedings of HCI International 2015 Framework for Cloud Usability Brian Stanton 1, Mary Theofanos 1, Karuna P Joshi 2 1 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD,
More informationEstimating Trust Value for Cloud Service Providers using Fuzzy Logic
Estimating Trust Value for Cloud Service Providers using Fuzzy Logic Supriya M, Venkataramana L.J, K Sangeeta Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering Kasavanahalli,
More informationKeywords: Cloudsim, MIPS, Gridlet, Virtual machine, Data center, Simulation, SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, VM. Introduction
Vol. 3 Issue 1, January-2014, pp: (1-5), Impact Factor: 1.252, Available online at: www.erpublications.com Performance evaluation of cloud application with constant data center configuration and variable
More informationA BROKER-BASED WEB SERVICE ARCHITECTURE FOR SERVICE REGISTRATION AND DISCOVERY WITH QOS
A BROKER-BASED WEB SERVICE ARCHITECTURE FOR SERVICE REGISTRATION AND DISCOVERY WITH QOS Dr. T.Rajendran Professor and Dean, Department of CSE &IT, Angel College of Engineering and Technology, Tirupur,
More informationProfit Maximization Of SAAS By Reusing The Available VM Space In Cloud Computing
www.ijecs.in International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science ISSN: 2319-7242 Volume 4 Issue 8 Aug 2015, Page No. 13822-13827 Profit Maximization Of SAAS By Reusing The Available VM Space In Cloud
More informationComparison of Trust Values using Triangular and Gaussian Fuzzy Membership Functions for Infrastructure as a Service
Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Communication, Network, and Computing, CNC Comparison of Trust Values using Triangular and Gaussian Fuzzy Membership Functions for Infrastructure as a Service A. Supriya
More informationA Study on Analysis and Implementation of a Cloud Computing Framework for Multimedia Convergence Services
A Study on Analysis and Implementation of a Cloud Computing Framework for Multimedia Convergence Services Ronnie D. Caytiles and Byungjoo Park * Department of Multimedia Engineering, Hannam University
More informationHierarchical Trust Model to Rate Cloud Service Providers based on Infrastructure as a Service
Hierarchical Model to Rate Cloud Service Providers based on Infrastructure as a Service Supriya M 1, Sangeeta K 1, G K Patra 2 1 Department of CSE, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,
More informationCLOUD SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS Meeting Customer and Provider needs
CLOUD SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS Meeting Customer and Provider needs Eric Simmon January 28 th, 2014 BACKGROUND Federal Cloud Computing Strategy Efficiency improvements will shift resources towards higher-value
More informationA Trust Evaluation Model for QoS Guarantee in Cloud Systems *
A Trust Evaluation Model for QoS Guarantee in Cloud Systems * Hyukho Kim, Hana Lee, Woongsup Kim, Yangwoo Kim Dept. of Information and Communication Engineering, Dongguk University Seoul, 100-715, South
More informationA Framework to Improve Communication and Reliability Between Cloud Consumer and Provider in the Cloud
A Framework to Improve Communication and Reliability Between Cloud Consumer and Provider in the Cloud Vivek Sridhar Rational Software Group (India Software Labs) IBM India Bangalore, India Abstract Cloud
More informationThe Hidden Extras. The Pricing Scheme of Cloud Computing. Stephane Rufer
The Hidden Extras The Pricing Scheme of Cloud Computing Stephane Rufer Cloud Computing Hype Cycle Definition Types Architecture Deployment Pricing/Charging in IT Economics of Cloud Computing Pricing Schemes
More informationProfit Based Data Center Service Broker Policy for Cloud Resource Provisioning
I J E E E C International Journal of Electrical, Electronics ISSN No. (Online): 2277-2626 and Computer Engineering 5(1): 54-60(2016) Profit Based Data Center Service Broker Policy for Cloud Resource Provisioning
More informationCloud deployment model and cost analysis in Multicloud
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) ISSN: 2278-2834, ISBN: 2278-8735. Volume 4, Issue 3 (Nov-Dec. 2012), PP 25-31 Cloud deployment model and cost analysis in Multicloud
More informationAn Efficient Frame of Reference for the Selection of Best Cloud Service Provider
An Efficient Frame of Reference for the Selection of Best Cloud Service Provider Bhushan N B M. Tech, CSE Department, MSRIT College, Bangalore, India Abstract: The recent technology term Cloud computing
More informationSLA-aware Resource Scheduling for Cloud Storage
SLA-aware Resource Scheduling for Cloud Storage Zhihao Yao Computer and Information Technology Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47906 Email: yao86@purdue.edu Ioannis Papapanagiotou Computer and
More informationA Load Balancing Model Based on Cloud Partitioning for the Public Cloud
International Journal of Information & Computation Technology. ISSN 0974-2239 Volume 4, Number 16 (2014), pp. 1605-1610 International Research Publications House http://www. irphouse.com A Load Balancing
More informationTowards Comparative Evaluation of Cloud Services
Towards Comparative Evaluation of Cloud Services Farrukh Nadeem Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Abstract:
More informationSLA Aware Cost based Service Ranking in Cloud Computing
SLA Aware Cost based Service Ranking in Cloud Computing Princy Bathla 1, Sahil Vashist 2 1 M.Tech Student, Department of Computer Science, CEC, Landran.Punjab(India) 2 Assisatant Professor, Department
More informationA Study on the Cloud Computing Architecture, Service Models, Applications and Challenging Issues
A Study on the Cloud Computing Architecture, Service Models, Applications and Challenging Issues Rajbir Singh 1, Vivek Sharma 2 1, 2 Assistant Professor, Rayat Institute of Engineering and Information
More informationPermanent Link: http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/r?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=154091
Citation: Alhamad, Mohammed and Dillon, Tharam S. and Wu, Chen and Chang, Elizabeth. 2010. Response time for cloud computing providers, in Kotsis, G. and Taniar, D. and Pardede, E. and Saleh, I. and Khalil,
More informationEFFECTIVE DATA RECOVERY FOR CONSTRUCTIVE CLOUD PLATFORM
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REVIEWS ON RECENT ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE EFFECTIVE DATA RECOVERY FOR CONSTRUCTIVE CLOUD PLATFORM Macha Arun 1, B.Ravi Kumar 2 1 M.Tech Student, Dept of CSE, Holy Mary
More informationA Broker Based Trust Model for Cloud Computing Environment
A Broker Based Trust Model for Cloud Computing Environment Chaitali Uikey 1, Dr. D. S. Bhilare 2 1 School of Computer Science & IT, DAVV, Indore, MP. India 2 Computer Center, DAVV, Indore, MP. India Abstract
More informationVirtual Cloud Bank: Cloud Service Broker for Intermediating Services Based on Semantic Analysis Models
UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP 2015 Virtual Cloud Bank: Cloud Service Broker for Intermediating Services Based on Semantic Analysis Models Joonseok Park Research Institute of Logistics Innovation and Networking
More informationDesign of Customer-Oriented Cloud Products
Design of Customer-Oriented Cloud Products Gülfem Isiklar Alptekin, S. Emre Alptekin Abstract Cloud computing is defined as a scalable services consumption and delivery platform that allows enterprises
More informationDynamic Resource Pricing on Federated Clouds
Dynamic Resource Pricing on Federated Clouds Marian Mihailescu and Yong Meng Teo Department of Computer Science National University of Singapore Computing 1, 13 Computing Drive, Singapore 117417 Email:
More informationQoS based Cloud Service Provider Selection Framework
Abstract Research Journal of Recent Sciences ISSN 2277-2502 QoS based Cloud Service Provider Selection Framework Kumar N. and Agarwal S. Department of Computer Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University,
More informationVOL. 4, NO. 2, March 2014 ISSN 2222-9833 ARPN Journal of Systems and Software 2009-2014 AJSS Journal. All rights reserved
Ranking Approaches for Cloud Computing Services Based on Quality of Service: A Review 1 Leyli Mohammadkhanli, 2 Arezoo Jahani * 1 Associate professor, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University
More informationResource Provisioning in Clouds via Non-Functional Requirements
Resource Provisioning in Clouds via Non-Functional Requirements By Diana Carolina Barreto Arias Under the supervision of Professor Rajkumar Buyya and Dr. Rodrigo N. Calheiros A minor project thesis submitted
More informationFull Length Research Article
Available online at http://www.journalijdr.com International Journal of DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH ISSN: 2230-9926 International Journal of Development Research Vol. 4, Issue, 5, pp. 1035-1040, May, 2014 Full
More informationEfficient Algorithm for Predicting QOS in Cloud Services Sangeeta R. Alagi, Srinu Dharavath
Efficient Algorithm for Predicting QOS in Cloud Services Sangeeta R. Alagi, Srinu Dharavath Abstract Now a days, Cloud computing is becoming more popular research topic. Building high-quality cloud applications
More informationNIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture
NIST Cloud Computing Reference Architecture Version 1 March 30, 2011 2 Acknowledgements This reference architecture was developed and prepared by Dr. Fang Liu, Jin Tong, Dr. Jian Mao, Knowcean Consulting
More informationResource Allocation Avoiding SLA Violations in Cloud Framework for SaaS
Resource Allocation Avoiding SLA Violations in Cloud Framework for SaaS Shantanu Sasane Abhilash Bari Kaustubh Memane Aniket Pathak Prof. A. A.Deshmukh University of Pune University of Pune University
More informationProfit-driven Cloud Service Request Scheduling Under SLA Constraints
Journal of Information & Computational Science 9: 14 (2012) 4065 4073 Available at http://www.joics.com Profit-driven Cloud Service Request Scheduling Under SLA Constraints Zhipiao Liu, Qibo Sun, Shangguang
More informationDESIGN OF AGENT BASED SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND CONTROLLING SLA IN CLOUD ENVIRONMENT
International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science www.ijates.com DESIGN OF AGENT BASED SYSTEM FOR MONITORING AND CONTROLLING SLA IN CLOUD ENVIRONMENT Sarwan Singh 1, Manish Arora
More informationExploring Resource Provisioning Cost Models in Cloud Computing
Exploring Resource Provisioning Cost Models in Cloud Computing P.Aradhya #1, K.Shivaranjani *2 #1 M.Tech, CSE, SR Engineering College, Warangal, Andhra Pradesh, India # Assistant Professor, Department
More informationInfrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) (ENCS 691K Chapter 4) Roch Glitho, PhD Associate Professor and Canada Research Chair My URL - http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~glitho/ References 1. R. Moreno et al.,
More informationAuto-Scaling Model for Cloud Computing System
Auto-Scaling Model for Cloud Computing System Che-Lun Hung 1*, Yu-Chen Hu 2 and Kuan-Ching Li 3 1 Dept. of Computer Science & Communication Engineering, Providence University 2 Dept. of Computer Science
More informationSERVICE BROKER ROUTING POLICES IN CLOUD ENVIRONMENT: A SURVEY
SERVICE BROKER ROUTING POLICES IN CLOUD ENVIRONMENT: A SURVEY Rekha P M 1 and M Dakshayini 2 1 Department of Information Science & Engineering, VTU, JSS academy of technical Education, Bangalore, Karnataka
More informationPerformance Gathering and Implementing Portability on Cloud Storage Data
International Journal of Information & Computation Technology. ISSN 0974-2239 Volume 4, Number 17 (2014), pp. 1815-1823 International Research Publications House http://www. irphouse.com Performance Gathering
More informationCloud Computing Service Models, Types of Clouds and their Architectures, Challenges.
Cloud Computing Service Models, Types of Clouds and their Architectures, Challenges. B.Kezia Rani 1, Dr.B.Padmaja Rani 2, Dr.A.Vinaya Babu 3 1 Research Scholar,Dept of Computer Science, JNTU, Hyderabad,Telangana
More informationA COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECURE SEARCH PROTOCOLS IN PAY- AS-YOU-GO CLOUDS
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SECURE SEARCH PROTOCOLS IN PAY- AS-YOU-GO CLOUDS V. Anand 1, Ahmed Abdul Moiz Qyser 2 1 Muffakham Jah College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, India 2 Muffakham Jah College
More informationSimulation-based Evaluation of an Intercloud Service Broker
Simulation-based Evaluation of an Intercloud Service Broker Foued Jrad, Jie Tao and Achim Streit Steinbuch Centre for Computing, SCC Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT Karlsruhe, Germany {foued.jrad,
More informationCloud Computing Architectures and Design Issues
Cloud Computing Architectures and Design Issues Ozalp Babaoglu, Stefano Ferretti, Moreno Marzolla, Fabio Panzieri {babaoglu, sferrett, marzolla, panzieri}@cs.unibo.it Outline What is Cloud Computing? A
More informationPRIVACY PRESERVATION ALGORITHM USING EFFECTIVE DATA LOOKUP ORGANIZATION FOR STORAGE CLOUDS
PRIVACY PRESERVATION ALGORITHM USING EFFECTIVE DATA LOOKUP ORGANIZATION FOR STORAGE CLOUDS Amar More 1 and Sarang Joshi 2 1 Department of Computer Engineering, Pune Institute of Computer Technology, Maharashtra,
More informationSecured Storage of Outsourced Data in Cloud Computing
Secured Storage of Outsourced Data in Cloud Computing Chiranjeevi Kasukurthy 1, Ch. Ramesh Kumar 2 1 M.Tech(CSE), Nalanda Institute of Engineering & Technology,Siddharth Nagar, Sattenapalli, Guntur Affiliated
More informationSurvey on important Cloud Service Provider attributes using the SMI Framework
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia Technology 9 (2013 ) 253 259 CENTERIS 2013 - Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems / ProjMAN 2013 - International Conference on Project
More informationAugmented Reality Application for Live Transform over Cloud
International Journal of Research in Information Technology (IJRIT) www.ijrit.com ISSN 2001-5569 Augmented Reality Application for Live Transform over Cloud Mr. Udaykumar N Tippa 1 Dr. Sujata Terdal 2
More informationSaving Mobile Battery Over Cloud Using Image Processing
Saving Mobile Battery Over Cloud Using Image Processing Khandekar Dipendra J. Student PDEA S College of Engineering,Manjari (BK) Pune Maharasthra Phadatare Dnyanesh J. Student PDEA S College of Engineering,Manjari
More informationMinimal Cost Data Sets Storage in the Cloud
Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology IJCSMC, Vol. 3, Issue. 5, May 2014, pg.1091
More informationPrivacy-Aware Scheduling for Inter-Organizational Processes
Privacy-Aware Scheduling for Inter-Organizational Processes Christoph Hochreiner Distributed Systems Group, Vienna University of Technology, Austria c.hochreiner@infosys.tuwien.ac.at Abstract Due to the
More informationFramework for Ranking Service Providers of Federated Cloud using Fuzzy Logic Sets
Framework for Ranking Service Providers of Federated Cloud using Fuzzy Logic Sets #1 Ms. L. Aruna *2 Dr. P.A. Abdul Saleem #3 Dr. M. Aramudhan 1 Research scholar,periyar University,Karaikal,T.N. 2 Professor
More informationWhat are you paying for? Performance benchmarking for Infrastructure-as-a-Service offerings
2011 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing What are you paying for? Performance benchmarking for Infrastructure-as-a-Service offerings Alexander Lenk, Michael Menzel, Johannes Lipsky, Stefan
More informationHeterogeneous Workload Consolidation for Efficient Management of Data Centers in Cloud Computing
Heterogeneous Workload Consolidation for Efficient Management of Data Centers in Cloud Computing Deep Mann ME (Software Engineering) Computer Science and Engineering Department Thapar University Patiala-147004
More informationAn Overview on Important Aspects of Cloud Computing
An Overview on Important Aspects of Cloud Computing 1 Masthan Patnaik, 2 Ruksana Begum 1 Asst. Professor, 2 Final M Tech Student 1,2 Dept of Computer Science and Engineering 1,2 Laxminarayan Institute
More informationAgent Based Framework for Scalability in Cloud Computing
Agent Based Framework for Scalability in Computing Aarti Singh 1, Manisha Malhotra 2 1 Associate Prof., MMICT & BM, MMU, Mullana 2 Lecturer, MMICT & BM, MMU, Mullana 1 Introduction: Abstract: computing
More informationFig. 1 WfMC Workflow reference Model
International Journal of Information & Computation Technology. ISSN 0974-2239 Volume 4, Number 10 (2014), pp. 997-1002 International Research Publications House http://www. irphouse.com Survey Paper on
More informationIntroduction to Track on Engineering Virtualized Services
Introduction to Track on Engineering Virtualized Services Reiner Hähnle 1 and Einar Broch Johnsen 2 1 Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany haehnle@cs.tu-darmstadt.de 2 Dept. of Informatics, University
More informationA Survey on Cloud Computing
A Survey on Cloud Computing Poulami dalapati* Department of Computer Science Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra Ranchi, India dalapati89@gmail.com G. Sahoo Department of Information Technology Birla
More informationOptimized Resource Allocation in Cloud Environment Based on a Broker Cloud Service Provider
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2013 1 Optimized Resource Allocation in Cloud Environment Based on a Broker Cloud Service Provider Jyothi.R.L *, Anilkumar.A
More informationHow to Do/Evaluate Cloud Computing Research. Young Choon Lee
How to Do/Evaluate Cloud Computing Research Young Choon Lee Cloud Computing Cloud computing is a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 4, April-2015 36 ISSN 2229-5518
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 6, Issue 4, April-2015 36 An Efficient Approach for Load Balancing in Cloud Environment Balasundaram Ananthakrishnan Abstract Cloud computing
More informationSecurity Considerations for Public Mobile Cloud Computing
Security Considerations for Public Mobile Cloud Computing Ronnie D. Caytiles 1 and Sunguk Lee 2* 1 Society of Science and Engineering Research Support, Korea rdcaytiles@gmail.com 2 Research Institute of
More informationSECURITY IN SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS FOR CLOUD COMPUTING
SECURITY IN SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS FOR CLOUD COMPUTING Karin Bernsmed, Martin Gilje Jaatun SINTEF Information and Communication Technology, Trondheim, Norway Karin.Bernsmed@sintef.no, Martin.G.Jaatun@sintef.no
More informationDynamic Resource Distribution Across Clouds
University of Victoria Faculty of Engineering Winter 2010 Work Term Report Dynamic Resource Distribution Across Clouds Department of Physics University of Victoria Victoria, BC Michael Paterson V00214440
More informationQOS Based Web Service Ranking Using Fuzzy C-means Clusters
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 10(9): 1045-1050, 2015 ISSN: 2040-7459; e-issn: 2040-7467 Maxwell Scientific Organization, 2015 Submitted: March 19, 2015 Accepted: April
More informationPayment minimization and Error-tolerant Resource Allocation for Cloud System Using equally spread current execution load
Payment minimization and Error-tolerant Resource Allocation for Cloud System Using equally spread current execution load Pooja.B. Jewargi Prof. Jyoti.Patil Department of computer science and engineering,
More informationOptimizing the Cost for Resource Subscription Policy in IaaS Cloud
Optimizing the Cost for Resource Subscription Policy in IaaS Cloud Ms.M.Uthaya Banu #1, Mr.K.Saravanan *2 # Student, * Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science and Engineering Regional Centre
More informationFederation of Cloud Computing Infrastructure
IJSTE International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering Vol. 1, Issue 1, July 2014 ISSN(online): 2349 784X Federation of Cloud Computing Infrastructure Riddhi Solani Kavita Singh Rathore B. Tech.
More informationAEIJST - June 2015 - Vol 3 - Issue 6 ISSN - 2348-6732. Cloud Broker. * Prasanna Kumar ** Shalini N M *** Sowmya R **** V Ashalatha
Abstract Cloud Broker * Prasanna Kumar ** Shalini N M *** Sowmya R **** V Ashalatha Dept of ISE, The National Institute of Engineering, Mysore, India Cloud computing is kinetically evolving areas which
More informationC-Meter: A Framework for Performance Analysis of Computing Clouds
9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid C-Meter: A Framework for Performance Analysis of Computing Clouds Nezih Yigitbasi, Alexandru Iosup, and Dick Epema Delft University
More informationA Trust-Evaluation Metric for Cloud applications
A Trust-Evaluation Metric for Cloud applications Mohammed Alhamad, Tharam Dillon, and Elizabeth Chang Abstract Cloud services are becoming popular in terms of distributed technology because they allow
More informationCloud Computing and Software Agents: Towards Cloud Intelligent Services
Cloud Computing and Software Agents: Towards Cloud Intelligent Services Domenico Talia ICAR-CNR & University of Calabria Rende, Italy talia@deis.unical.it Abstract Cloud computing systems provide large-scale
More informationCustomer Security Issues in Cloud Computing
Available Online at www.ijcsmc.com International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing A Monthly Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology ISSN 2320 088X IJCSMC, Vol. 2, Issue.
More informationA QoS-Aware Web Service Selection Based on Clustering
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2014 1 A QoS-Aware Web Service Selection Based on Clustering R.Karthiban PG scholar, Computer Science and Engineering,
More informationInternational Journal of Engineering Research & Management Technology
International Journal of Engineering Research & Management Technology March- 2015 Volume 2, Issue-2 Survey paper on cloud computing with load balancing policy Anant Gaur, Kush Garg Department of CSE SRM
More informationSupply Chain Platform as a Service: a Cloud Perspective on Business Collaboration
Supply Chain Platform as a Service: a Cloud Perspective on Business Collaboration Guopeng Zhao 1, 2 and Zhiqi Shen 1 1 Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798 2 HP Labs Singapore, Singapore
More informationRound Robin with Server Affinity: A VM Load Balancing Algorithm for Cloud Based Infrastructure
J Inf Process Syst, Vol.9, No.3, September 2013 pissn 1976-913X eissn 2092-805X http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/jips.2013.9.3.379 Round Robin with Server Affinity: A VM Load Balancing Algorithm for Cloud Based
More informationInformation Security Management System for Cloud Computing
ICT Innovations 2011 Web Proceedings ISSN 1857-7288 49 Information Security Management System for Cloud Computing Sashko Ristov, Marjan Gushev, and Magdalena Kostoska Ss. Cyril and Methodius University
More informationAN IMPLEMENTATION OF E- LEARNING SYSTEM IN PRIVATE CLOUD
AN IMPLEMENTATION OF E- LEARNING SYSTEM IN PRIVATE CLOUD M. Lawanya Shri 1, Dr. S. Subha 2 1 Assistant Professor,School of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore-632014
More informationCloudAnalyst: A CloudSim-based Visual Modeller for Analysing Cloud Computing Environments and Applications
CloudAnalyst: A CloudSim-based Visual Modeller for Analysing Cloud Computing Environments and Applications Bhathiya Wickremasinghe 1, Rodrigo N. Calheiros 2, and Rajkumar Buyya 1 1 The Cloud Computing
More informationComparative Study of Resource Provisioning in Clouds by an administrator to deploy applications
International Journal of Advanced Computer Communications and Control Vol. 02, No. 01, January 2014 Comparative Study of Resource Provisioning in Clouds by an administrator to deploy applications P.R.S.M.
More informationCost Effective Approach for Automatic Service Provider Selection in Cloud Computing
Cost Effective Approach for Automatic Service Provider Section in Cloud Computing Preeti Gulia 1, Sumedha Sood 2 1,2 (Department of Computer Science and Applications, M.D. University, Rohtak, Haryana,
More informationHave We Really Understood the Cloud Yet?
1 Have We Really Understood the Cloud Yet? Plethora of Definitions Hype? Range of Technologies and business models What really clicks in the Cloud? Pay per use no capex only opex! Meet seasonal loads elasticity
More informationCOMBINE DIFFERENT TRUST MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUE: RECOMMENDATIONAND REPUTATION IN CLOUD SERVICE. B.Brithi #1, K. Kiruthikadevi *2
COMBINE DIFFERENT TRUST : RECOMMENDATIONAND REPUTATION IN CLOUD SERVICE B.Brithi #1, K. Kiruthikadevi *2 1 P.G Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Nandha College of Technology, Erode.
More information