Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No. 076519 Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No. 176766. Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT"

Transcription

1 GIBBS & FUERSTttr 600 B STREET, SUITE 2300 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE ( FACSIMILE ( Michael T. Gibbs, State Bar No Kevin L. Borgen, State Bar No Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH COUNTY DIVISION VICTORIA MUNOZ RICHART, Plaintiff, vs. MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT; GLORIA CARRANZA; JUDY STRATTAN; JACQUELINE SIMON; and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants ~ Case No CU-OE-NC Assigned for All Purposes to: Hon. Jacqueline M. Stem, Dept. N-27 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER Hearing Date: March 27, 2015 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: N-27 Action Filed: Trial Date: January 14, 2011 April 10, 2015 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The Ex Parte Application of Defendant MiraCosta Community College District ("District" came on for hearing on March 27, 2015, before the Honorable Judge Jacqueline M. Stem. Plaintiff appearing by counsel Robert P Ottilie, Esq. The District appearing by counsel Michael T. Gibbs, Esq. The Individual Defendants appearing by counsel Anthony R. Taylor, Esq. of the Law Firm of Aleshire & Wynder, LLP NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER

2 The court accepted the Ex Parte Application and accepted the executed Settlement Agreements provided with the Ex Parte Application as Exhibits "A" and "B" for filing in the court records. DATED: March 27, 2015 GIBBS & FUERST, LLP By r11~~r:td?j MiCAEL'CGIBBS Attorneys for Defendant MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER

3 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE A This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release ("Agreement" is made by MIRA COST A COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ("MiraCosta" and DR. VICTORIA MUNOZ RICHART ("Dr. Richart ". MiraCosta and Dr. Richart are hereinafter sometimes individually referenced as "Party" and collectively referenced as the "Parties." 1 RECITALS This Agreement is executed with reference to the following facts and circumstances. 1.1 On January 14, 2011, Dr. Richart filed an action in the San Diego Superior Court, framed in ten causes of action and naming as defendants MiraCosta, Gloria Carranza, Judy Strattan, and Jacqueline Simon (Carranza, Strattan and Simon may be referred to as "Individual Defendants", Case No CU-OE-NC ("Richart Litigation", which is incorporated herein by reference, but which included the following claims Dr. Richart entered into an employment agreement ("Employment Agreement" with MiraCosta effective July 2004 in which she was to have served as the Superintendent/ President at MiraCosta for four years. On two subsequent occasions, the Parties entered into new employment agreements, with the latest agreement having been entered into on July 18, On or about June 20, 2007, MiraCosta and Dr. Richart, along with all seven individual MiraCosta Trustees, entered into a Compromise Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement ("Settlement Agreement". Dr. Richart has contended that agreement was intended to resolve all issues and/or claims among the parties thereto and, among other things, obligated Dr. Richart to vacate the office of Superintendent/President of MiraCosta upon payment of certain

4 consideration and to release MiraCosta of her employment rights after working through December 31, Subsequent to execution of the Settlement Agreement, a taxpayer, Leon James Page ("Page", filed an action against MiraCosta and Dr. Richart in San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-WM-NC ("Page Litigation" in which he contended that MiraCosta had violated the law in entering into the Settlement Agreement with Dr. Richart, naming Dr. Richart only in the sixth cause of action for unjust enrichment in which he sought the return of consideration received by Dr. Richart that she was not otherwise entitled to receive under the law or her employment agreement (as requested specifically in Page Complaint, ~ Final judgment in the Page Litigation was entered on October 7, 2010 by the Honorable William S. Dato ("Dato Judgment" in which Judge Dato returned the Parties to the "status quo ante" that existed prior to the 2007 Settlement Agreement Subsequent to the Dato Judgment, Dr. Richart asserted restoration of her employment rights. MiraCosta disputed Dr. Richart's asserted employment rights In the first through ninth causes of action, Dr. Richart alleged claims for: violation of constitutional property interests (including a 1983 claim; violation of constitutional liberty interests; breach of contract; retaliation under California's Labor Code; retaliation under California's Government Code whistleblower statute; common law wrongful termination; and violation of California Civil Code 52.1 (Bane Act, claiming defendants attempted to, and actually, interfered with her constitutional and statutory rights. Dr. Richart's alternative theories of liability in her complaint were premised upon identical facts incorporated into each cause of action and which were premised upon her claim that the conduct directed at her was for asserting rights allowed by law and in retaliation for taking the described actions specifically as required and permitted by law. Specifically, Dr. Richart contended that actions were taken against her for 2

5 reasons that included, but were not limited to: her role in reporting and overseeing an investigation into allegations of misconduct and malfeasance at MiraCosta; reporting that information to the Trustees of MiraCosta; in taking personnel actions arising therefrom; reporting the conduct to the San Diego County District Attorney; and, cooperating in an investigation by the office of the District Attorney In the tenth cause of action for declaratory relief, Dr. Richart sought a declaration from the court to resolve a dispute between the Parties with respect to the sums Dr. Richart owed to MiraCosta as a result of the Dato Judgment. Dr. Richart there asked the court to formally determine the amount she owed to MiraCosta and asked that the sum be declared as $785,000, minus $10,000 in payments already made, for a total of $775,000. At the conclusion of the Page Litigation, the Honorable Timothy Casserly had ruled that the Dato Judgment was not a monetary judgment and therefore not subject to collection. In his ruling on a motion for a writ of execution, Judge Casserly ruled that the amount of repayment to Mira Costa by Dr. Richart would be resolved in the tenth cause of action in the Richart Litigation, already on file at the time of Judge Casserly' s ruling. 1.2 MiraCosta and the other defendants have denied the allegations of Dr. Richart's complaint. In addition to the rights and remedies Mira Costa claims to hold by virtue of the amended order and judgment in the Page Litigation, MiraCosta represents that Leon James Page assigned to MiraCosta all rights and remedies he held as against Dr. Richart by virtue of the Amended Order and Judgment in the Page Litigation. That assignment was executed on about January 25, The facts and circumstances alleged by the Parties in 1.1 through 1.2 above shall be referred to as the "Incident." 1.4 Prior to filing the Richart Litigation, Dr. Richart filed four distinct claims under 3

6 the California Tort Claims Act, claims which cumulatively totaled in excess of 120 pages. Since 2011, the Parties have engaged in extensive discovery regarding the claims and defenses underlying Dr. Richart's claims. This included multiple sets of written discovery exchanged between the five Parties and 35 percipient depositions, not including experts. MiraCosta responded to 15 related Public Records Act requests. Discovery in the case, even with a stay in the middle of the litigation, extended over more than two years. Seven experts were cumulatively designated by the Parties. Almost 10,000 pages of documents have been exchanged. Trial estimates range up to eight weeks. 1.5 MiraCosta challenged Dr. Richart's claims through multiple dispositive motions, including a motion under California's Anti-SLAPP statute, an appeal from the court's SLAPP ruling to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and three summary judgment motions. The three individual defendants filed a demurrer and their own summary judgment motion. All but one of these motions have been ruled upon by the court. All causes of action but one survived the motions. 1.6 The Parties utilized three different mediators beginning in 2010 in an attempt to resolve their disputes. This included the Honorable Leo S. Papas, attorney Timothy Corcoran, and Thomas E. Sharkey who oversaw the final mediation and has overseen the Parties' settlement as reflected herein. The Parties mediated over at least eight different days, over five years. The settlement included herein has been recommended by mediator Thomas E. Sharkey This Agreement is intended to resolve, without any admission of wrongdoing, any and all claims and potential claims the Parties hereto (MiraCosta and Dr. Richart may have against one another as of the date of this Agreement except as to specific exemptions set forth in and herein. The Parties acknowledge that the terms set forth below are sufficient consideration for the Agreement. 4

7 1.8 The effective date of this Agreement shall be deemed to be the date of the approval or acceptance of this Agreement by the Honorable Jacqueline M. Stem of the San Diego Superior Court. Alternatively, if Judge Stem declines to rule on the Agreement because she determines she does not have jurisdiction to accept and/or approve the Agreement, then the effective date will be the date last executed by a Party herein. 1.9 After years of dispute and litigation, the Parties desire to have a global settlement that resolves all claims and as against all Parties and ends all of the litigation, and do so in a manner which is consistent with the law. To respond to concerns raised by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in the Page Litigation, and out of an abundance of caution, the Parties hereto (Richart and MiraCosta intend to enter into two distinct agreements. This Agreement is intended to resolve Dr. Richart's claimed ongoing employment relationship with MiraCosta and alleged contract-based claim for termination of that contract, with the" exempted issues" addressed in below to be resolved in a separate agreement. In the separate agreement between these same Parties, and for independent consideration, the Parties intend to address the exempted issues, which will effectuate a release of all remaining claims Dr. Richart has against MiraCosta as set forth therein Further, consistent with the Parties' desire to have a global settlement and resolve all litigation, the Parties here acknowledge that Dr. Richart is independently negotiating a settlement with the three Individual Defendants, Gloria Carranza, Judy Strattan and Jacqueline Simon, who are represented by separate counsel, the law firm of Aleshire & Wynder. If those efforts are successful, that settlement will be reflected in an independent settlement agreement. However, it is a contingency of this Agreement that this Agreement will be binding upon the Parties only when all of the payments in all three of the contemplated settlements have both been made and all settlement funds negotiated. If any Party to any of the three agreements fails to 5

8 make any payment within the time specified herein, or if funds do not exist for the satisfactory negotiation of the checks provided, then this Agreement, and the other two, will be void whether or not the Parties have all executed the agreements and whether or not all other payments required hereunder have been made. In the event a failure of consideration results in the voiding of this and the other Agreement as set forth herein, the Parties will meet with Judge Stem and promptly set the Richart Litigation for trial as against all of the defendants and on all remaining causes of action, not just the Parties hereto. 2 SETTLEMENT In settlement of all claims alleged by Dr. Richart against MiraCosta in the Richart Litigation arising from Dr. Richart's claimed ongoing employment relationship with MiraCosta and alleged contract-based claim for termination of that contract, with the "exempted issues" identified in to be resolved in a separate agreement between these same Parties, the Parties hereto agree as follows. 2.1 MiraCosta shall pay to Dr. Richart the sum of $387,500, payable as set forth herein. 2.2 Dr. Richart shall pay MiraCosta the sum of $387,500, which represents the return to MiraCosta of one-half of the compensation or its equivalent monetary value received by Dr. Richart under the Parties' 2007 Settlement Agreement. For purposes herein, calculation of the total amount of the compensation or its equivalent monetary value to be returned by Dr. Richart, which is the full amount she had pied in her declaratory relief action, is as follows: The return of a $650,000 payment to Dr. Richart received in June 2007 as partial settlement of her claims released in the June 20, 2007 Settlement Agreement; Repayment of a $45,000 payment made by MiraCosta for Dr. Richart in 6

9 August 2007 to a 403(b account held by Dr. Richart as partial payment made by MiraCosta under the Parties' 2007 Settlement Agreement; Repayment of a $45,000 payment made by MiraCosta for Dr. Richart in January 2008 to a 403(b account held by Dr. Richart as partial payment made by Mira Costa under the Parties' 2007 Settlement Agreement; Repayment of a $45,000 payment made by MiraCosta for Dr. Richart in January 2009 to a 403(b account held by Dr. Richart as partial payment made by MiraCosta under the Parties' 2007 Settlement Agreement; Deduction for two payments totaling $10,000 already made by Dr. Richart by trust account checks (numbered 1041and1042 sent in December 2010 and January 2011 from attorney Michael O'Halloran, checks that were cashed bymiracosta in With the deductions, the remaining sum owed is $775,000, one-half of which is paid here. 2.3 Given that the total sum to be paid by MiraCosta in its two agreements is the same as the amount the Parties have agreed herein Dr. Richart owes to MiraCosta, MiraCosta will not actually pay Dr. Richart any money under this Agreement. Instead, it will offset $387,500 of the $775,000 Dr. Richart owes MiraCosta against money that would otherwise be paid to Dr. Richart under this Agreement, resulting in no net payment by either Party under this Agreement. 2.4 Dr. Richart shall file a request for dismissal with prejudice of San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-OE-NC, as to MiraCosta within five (5 business days of: complete execution of both agreements with MiraCosta, execution of an agreement with the other defendants, delivery of all monetary payments contemplated under all three Agreements, and satisfactory negotiation of those payments. Dr. Richart agrees to cooperate by promptly depositing those checks and confirming that the checks have been satisfactorily negotiated by the 7

10 financial institutions into which they are deposited. The Parties acknowledge that failure to timely receive and successfully negotiate all consideration called for in all three agreements voids this, and the other, Agreement(s and allows Dr. Richart to set this matter for trial as against all defendants on all issues. 2.5 It is expressly understood that each party hereto shall bear its or her own costs and attorney's fees incurred in San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-OE-NC and with respect to all other claims released herein. 2.6 Neither Party makes any representation to the other regarding the taxability or legal effect of the amounts paid under this Agreement, and neither Party is relying on any statement or representation from the other Party in this regard. Each Party shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes and penalties assessed on the settlement amounts, if any. 2.7 As further consideration for this Agreement, the Parties enter into mutual releases as set forth below Dr. Richart hereby releases and forever discharges MiraCosta, its agents, principals, employers, employees, officers, officials, trustees, attorneys, insurers, joint powers insurance authority, indemnitors, predecessors, successors, assigns, directors, shareholders, parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates (collectively "Releasees" from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, suits at law or equity, debts, sums of money, accounts, controversies, rights, damages, penalties, fines, costs, attorney's fees, losses, expenses, contracts, agreements, promises or liabilities whatsoever, known or unknown, suspected to exist, or not suspected to exist, that arise from Dr. Richart's claimed ongoing employment relationship with MiraCosta and alleged contract-based claim for termination of that contract, as those specific claims are asserted in San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-OE-NC, up to and including the date of 8

11 the execution of this Agreement; provided, however, this release does not extend to MiraCosta's specific obligations pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, nor does it extend to the three Individual Defendants as described in below or the exempted issues described in below MiraCosta hereby releases and forever discharges Dr. Richart, her agents, principals, employers, employees, officers, officials, trustees, attorneys, insurers, indemnitors, predecessors, successors, assigns, directors, shareholders, parents, subsidiaries, or affiliates (collectively "Releasees" from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, suits at law or equity, debts, sums of money, accounts, controversies, rights, damages, penalties, fines, costs, attorney's fees, losses, expenses, contracts, agreements, promises or liabilities whatsoever, known or unknown, suspected to exist, or not suspected to exist, described in San Diego Superior Court Case No CU-OE-NC or this Agreement or otherwise related to the Parties' relationship as described in 1.1 to 1.8 above that arise from Dr. Richart's claimed ongoing employment relationship with MiraCosta and alleged contract-based claim for termination of that contract, up to and including the date of the execution of this Agreement; provided, however, this release does not extend to Dr. Richart's specific obligations pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, nor does it extend to the exempted issues described in below. 2.8 This section is intended to address the sole exceptions from the releases provided above Specifically excluded from the release provided by Dr. Richart in and above are the Individual Defendants Gloria Carranza, Jacqueline Simon, and Judith Strattan. Dr. Richart intends to enter into a separate settlement agreement and release 9

12 with the Individual Defendants, and any release provided to them will be addressed therein Specifically excluded from this release are the exempted issues which will be all other claims Dr. Richart has against MiraCosta arising from the Incident and as alleged in the Richart Litigation, and as specifically released in of the Parties' other agreement. 2.9 The Parties hereto have read and understand California Civil Code MiraCosta and Dr. Richart both specifically waive and relinquish all rights and benefits afforded to each of them under California Civil Code 1542, which provides as follows: A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor This release and Agreement includes any and all claims and liens for medical services, government benefits, legal services, or liens of any kind whatsoever, whether actual or asserted, present or prospective, any claims, causes of action, or rights to attorney's fees, penalties, fines, interest, and costs incurred, whether actual or asserted, present or prospective. Dr. Richart waives any private cause of action that she may now or at any later time have against any other Party or Releasees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1395y in relation to the Incident. Dr. Richart further agrees for herself, her heirs, agents, executors, administrators, and assigns to fully and expressly indemnify, save and hold harmless and defend MiraCosta and Releasees from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, damages, costs and losses, and liabilities arising out of any lien or claim described herein. In the event of any claim, lien, demand, or cause of action described herein, Dr. Richart agrees to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information or documents. 10

13 2.11 The Parties acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts or circumstances different from, or in addition to, those that they now know or believe to be true with respect to this Agreement and/or the released claims, and the Parties agree that this Agreement shall nevertheless be and remain fully effective in all respects. Each Party recognizes the risk that compensation to be paid under this Agreement may be challenged as illegal. Each Party represents that it has independently evaluated the risk and has come to its own conclusion regarding the legality of this Agreement. Each Party agrees that it will not initiate, or encourage or cause to be initiated, any challenge to the legality of this Agreement The Parties hereto represent and warrant that they have not heretofore assigned, transferred or purported to assign or transfer, and covenant that they will not assign, transfer or purport to assign or transfer, to any person or entity, any liability, claim, demand, action, cause of action, defense, and right which is herein released and discharged as set forth in paragraphs and above; and, the Parties hereto shall indemnify and defend each person and entity released and discharged by the provisions of paragraphs and above, and their respective agents, assigns, transferees, representatives, attorneys, insurers, and each of them, and shall defend and hold them harmless, from and against: (i any liability, claim, demand, or action, cause of action or right assigned or transferred contrary to the foregoing warranty; and (ii any and all loss, expense and/or liability arising directly or indirectly out of any breach of the foregoing warranty by any party hereto. As addressed in paragraph 1.2 in the Recitals above, MiraCosta represents that it has received a full assignment of any and all rights possessed by Page in the Page Litigation and under the Dato Judgment, and that Page has no further rights as all have been transferred to MiraCosta. This warranty contained herein is also intended to encompass any rights previously held by Page which have been assigned to MiraCosta. All of the defense and indemnity provisions herein shall apply to MiraCosta to the extent of any claim 11

14 by Page or other Page assignees acting under the rights claimed in the Page Litigation or Dato Judgment Each Party, upon receipt of the payments directed to them as provided herein, shall file a Satisfaction of Judgment with San Diego County providing that the Dato Judgment has been satisfied in full by the paying Party. Satisfaction of Judgments, by both Parties, shall be filed within ten (10 days of the satisfactory negotiation of the settlement funds transferred hereunder, and satisfactory negotiation of the settlement funds received by Dr. Richart from the Individual Trustees. As addressed above, this Agreement shall be void if all payments by all parties are not made and no Satisfaction of Judgment shall be filed until all payments and satisfactorily made and negotiated This Agreement is a compromise of disputed claims, and nothing contained herein, including the furnishing of any consideration, shall be construed as an admission of any liability or wrongdoing by any person, firm, association or corporation Each of the Parties to this Agreement shall hereafter execute all documents and do all acts necessary, convenient or desirable, in the reasonable opinion of the other party, to effect the provisions of this Agreement This Agreement shall be governed by California law and the San Diego Superior Court, specifically the Honorable Jacqueline M. Stem, shall retain jurisdiction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and to enforce performance in full of this Agreement, until performance in full of this settlement has occurred. The Parties agree that any further action related to this Agreement shall be in San Diego County The Parties to this Agreement have each been represented by independent legal counsel in negotiating the settlement reflected by this Agreement and in drafting this Agreement. 12

15 They and their attorneys have made such investigations of the facts concerning this Agreement as the Parties have felt was necessary. Each Party has relied upon their own and their own legal counsel's investigations and not upon any representations of the other Parties in deciding to enter into this Agreement, except for the representations expressly set forth in this Agreement In an action brought to enforce this Agreement, an action which claims a breach of this Agreement, or an action wherein this Agreement is successfully raised as a defense, the prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs. In any action filed by a third party challenging the legality of this Agreement, each Party hereto, if named as a defendant, shall bear its own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. This provision is not intended to affect or restrict a Party seeking to recover attorney's fees, costs and expenses from the third party who files the challenge The terms of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of each of the Parties, Releasees, their respective attorneys, directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, heirs, successors, assigns, and any other person or entity claiming an interest through any of the Parties Except as expressly stated herein, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to confer any right, power, or privilege upon any non-party to this Agreement. Except as expressly stated herein, this Agreement shall not be construed as creating any obligation by any Party in favor of a non-party to this Agreement The language of this Agreement is the product of the mutual effort of the Parties and their respective legal counsel. This Agreement shall be construed fairly as to all Parties, and it shall not be construed for or against any Party on this basis to which that Party participated in drafting it This Agreement may be pleaded or asserted by or on behalf of the Parties or Releasees as a defense and bar to any action or claim that may be brought against a Party or 13

16 Releasee by anyone with respect to any of the matters within the scope of this Agreement, excepting only the obligations of this Agreement This Agreement constitutes a single, integrated contract expressing the Parties' entire Agreement concerning its subject matter. All prior discussions and negotiations concerning the subject matter of this Agreement have been merged and integrated into, and are superseded by, this Agreement. This Agreement may not be modified except by writing signed by all Parties to be bound by the modification This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, including facsimile and electronically submitted counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument The captions by which the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Agreement are identified are for convenience only and shall have no effect whatsoever upon its interpretation Both Dr. Richart and MiraCosta agree that neither of them, nor their agents, will discuss content of settlement negotiations or mediation-privileged communications The Parties recognize that MiraCosta is a public entity subject to the Public Records Act. 3 COURT APPROVAL 3.1 A contingency of this Agreement is to submit this executed Agreement and release to the Honorable Jacqueline M. Stern by ex parte application at the earliest available date, to make the settlement a part of the official court record and/or to obtain approval of the settlement from Judge Stern. 3.2 The effective date of this Agreement shall be deemed to be the date of either approval or acceptance of this Agreement by the Honorable Jacqueline M. Stern of the San Diego 14

17 Superior Court. Alternatively, if Judge Stern declines to rule on the Agreement because she determines she does not have jurisdiction to accept and/or approve the Agreement, then the effective date will be the date last executed by a Party herein. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. THIS AGREEMENT CONTAINS A RELEASE OF ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CLAIMS TO THE DATE OF ITS EXECUTION. MIRACOSTA AND DR. RICHART ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THEY HA VE BEEN ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS A BINDlNG AND LEGAL DOCUMENT AND THAT THEY HA VE ACTED VOLUNTARILY AND HA VE NOT RELIED UPON ANY REPRESENTATION MADE BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR ANY OTHER PARTY'S EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS (EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT'S SUBJECT MATTER AND/OR EFFECT. MJRACOSTA AND DR. RICHART HA VE READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS AGREEMENT AND VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ITS TERMS. AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD: Dated: 3 ~ Q6-15 ~C!r~~ VICTORIA MUNOZ RJCT MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ~ /JENNES l'in6n L_p_re{ident, Board of Trustees 15

18 Superior Court. Alternatively, if Judge Stem declines to rule on the Agreement because she determines she does not have jurisdiction to accept and/or approve the Agreement, then the effective date will be the date last executed by a Party herein. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. THIS AGREEMENT CONTAINS A RELEASE OF ALL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN CLAIMS TO THE DATE OF ITS EXECUTION. MIRACOSTA AND DR. RICHART ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THEY HA VE BEEN ADVISED THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS A BINDING AND LEGAL DOCUMENT AND THAT THEY HA VE ACTED VOLUNTARILY AND HAVE NOT RELIED UPON ANY REPRESENTATION MADE BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR ANY OTHER PARTY'S EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS (EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED HEREIN REGARDING THIS AGREEMENT'S SUBJECT MATTER AND/OR EFFECT. MIRACOSTA AND DR. RICHART HAVE READ AND FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS AGREEMENT AND VOLUNTARILY AGREE TO ITS TERMS. AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD: Dated: Date~~ ;(~, M/5 I VICTORIA MUNOZ RICHART MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 15

19 , Approved as to form: Dated: 3 - :2' -f '5 By~_._,~~+-~~-=-~, ~~~~~ ROBERT P. OTTILIE Attorney for VICTORIA MUNOZ RICHART GIBBS & FUERST, LLP By~di~ ichael GIBBS Attorneys for MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JONATHAN DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 14 CV 01232 ) vs. ) ) Honorable Michael M. Mihm THE CITY OF PEORIA, et al.,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SETTLEMENT OFFICER INFORMATION: _ Telephone: 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case No: RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Date: Time: :0 a.m. Case Assigned

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Prince was employed as KSU s head football coach between December 5, 2005 and December 31, 2008; and

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE. WHEREAS, Prince was employed as KSU s head football coach between December 5, 2005 and December 31, 2008; and SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into this 6 th day of May, 2011, by and between Kansas State University ( KSU ) and

More information

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement.

Employee Settlement and Release Agreement. Form: Description: Release: No Disparagement: References: Review by Counsel: Employee Settlement and Release Agreement. This is a sample form agreement for the settlement of any claims by an employee against

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Cheryl Coryea ( Coryea or Plaintiff ), and Rochester Independent School District

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE is hereby entered into as of the

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE. THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE is hereby entered into as of the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE is hereby entered into as of the 3 rd day of September 2015, by and between MALIA KIM BENDIS ( PLAINTIFF ) and SERGEANT NICK LIBERIO,

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,

More information

Case 2:06-cv-00532-FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11

Case 2:06-cv-00532-FCD-KJM Document 220 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 11 Case :0-cv-00-FCD-KJM Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 EDMUND G. BROWN JR., State Bar No. 00 Attorney General of California PAUL REYNAGA, State Bar No. Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELIZABETH A.

More information

THIRD AMENDMENT TO DOMESTIC FACTORING AGREEMENT

THIRD AMENDMENT TO DOMESTIC FACTORING AGREEMENT THIRD AMENDMENT TO DOMESTIC FACTORING AGREEMENT Exhibit 10.139 This Third Amendment to Domestic Factoring Agreement ( Amendment ) made as of April 29, 2004 by and between Pacific Business Funding, a division

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE RECITALS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (the "Agreement") is made as of December 5, 2007 (the "Effective Date"), by and between RELIABLE HEALTH CARE SERVICES,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between The LAPD Newton Area Police Activities League, Inc. ( Plaintiff ) and the City of

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (hereinafter "the Agreement") is entered into by and between Plaintiff, CITY OF PIEDMONT, CALIFORNIA, and its respective City entities,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into as of and on the last date set forth herein below by and between/among: "Plaintiff":

More information

Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release

Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release Settlement Agreement & Mutual Release This agreement is useful for completing the renegotiation of a deal perhaps you offer to pay a reduced amount of a long-standing invoice perhaps you have a complex

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE. This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Release ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between George Liberman Enterprises, Inc. ( Liberman ), on one

More information

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED

More information

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:

Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: Case 1:12-cv-01203-VEC Document 206 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 10 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 10/15/2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITY OF

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the "Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into this day of, 2015, by and between: "Claimant" "Defendant" "Insurer" Recitals

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND JEFF SCHMIDT THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into as of February 20, 2006, by and between the American Institute

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. to herein individually as a Party and collectively as the Parties. RECITALS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of this 10th day of August, 2011, by, between, and among the following undersigned parties: The Federal Deposit

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the "Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into by and between: "Plaintiffs" "Defendants" Insurer Recitals A. Plaintiffs filed

More information

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.

As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement And Release Of All Claims ( Agreement ) is made and entered by and between [EMPLOYEE] and the Municipality of Anchorage and [MUNICIPAL

More information

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement

REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement IN THE MATTER OF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA AND SOUTHLAND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS REGULATORY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Regulatory Settlement Agreement ) is entered

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION BEFORE THE FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION COMBUSTION STORE LIMITED, Complainant, V Docket No. 15-02 UNIGROUP WORLDWIDE, INC., Respondent. OFFER OF JUDGMENT COMES NOW, Respondent UNIGROUP WORLDWIDE, inc. and,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 1 In re LONGS DRUG STORES CORP. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. C-0-0 CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT

More information

AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES

AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of December 1, 2003, by and between the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, a body corporate and politic

More information

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by the States

THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by the States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the STATES OF CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, NEVADA, VIRGINIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and STATE

More information

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Courtroom: 19 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO City and County Building, Room 256 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiff: RAYMOND AND SALLY MILLER, ET AL., on behalf of themselves and all

More information

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

~INAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 1:12-cv-06677-JSR Document 110 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EDWARD ZYBURO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, NCSPLUS

More information

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS

STANDARD CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS Notice: This Agreement is not valid unless signed and accepted by an officer of The Feldman Law Firm, P.C., who will make the sole decision whether to accept your case. This Agreement may be digitally

More information

Reverse Mortgage Specialist

Reverse Mortgage Specialist ADVISOR/LENDER APPLICANT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT This ADVISOR/LENDER APPLICANT ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made this day of, 200_ by and between Oaktree Funding Corporation, a California Corporation

More information

r usnc srii~v~ - - ---

r usnc srii~v~ - - --- Case 1:10-cv-07838-PAC Document 91 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:10-cv-07838-PAC Document 90-2 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN HILL, Individually

More information

INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT

INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT INVESTMENT ADVISER REPRESENTATIVE AGREEMENT This investment adviser representative agreement ( Agreement ), made as of, 20, is between Partners for Prosperity, Inc., a Nevada corporation, with the principal

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREF.MENT. CFDIC-R"), on the une hand, and Group One Mmtgage, Inc., ("the Settling Defendant")

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREF.MENT. CFDIC-R), on the une hand, and Group One Mmtgage, Inc., (the Settling Defendant) SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREF.MENT This Settlement and Release Agreement C 1 Agreement") is made as of this th day of December, 2013, by, between, and among the following undersigned parties: The Plaintiff

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and the United States

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and the United States SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into among the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and the United States Attorney s Office

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 2:03-cv-01500-KOB -TMP Document 1718 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 FILED 2010 Jul-26 PM 02:01 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

More information

CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement

CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement CLS Investments, LLC Instructions for the Solicitor Application and Agreement Please complete all fields on page 1 of the Solicitor Application and Agreement. Some general guidelines are set forth below.

More information

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG14722983 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG14722983 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG14722983 MUTUAL This Release and Settlement Agreement ("AGREEMENT") is entered into by and between Defendant

More information

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case 3:07-cv-01886-JAG-SCC Document 473 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO SAMUEL HILDENBRAND, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly

More information

Information or instructions: Contingency fee agreement for personal injury cases PREVIEW

Information or instructions: Contingency fee agreement for personal injury cases PREVIEW Information or instructions: Contingency fee agreement for personal injury cases 1. The following form is a written contingency fee agreement that may be used to employ the attorney to handle the personal

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS is entered into this day of 2012, by and between Michael Lacey (hereinafter "Lacey "'Employee")

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement ) is entered into by SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (hereafter Agreement is entered into by and between the American Academy of Actuaries (the Academy and Bruce D. Schobel ( Mr. Schobel. The Academy and Mr.

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE There is no one size fits all. However, there are some general terms that are usually in the agreement. Payment Terms. Parties should agree on the amount if money

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN MARK LONG AND THE STATE OF OREGON RECITALS A. Mark Long (hereinafter Plaintiff ) is an employee with the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services. The

More information

COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, INC. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, INC. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE AGREEMENT COLUMBIA GAS OF OHIO, INC. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Agreement made this day of, 2, ( Agreement ) by and between, located at ( Supplier ) and Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. ( Company ), 290

More information

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust ("Trust").

A. Arizona School Risk Retention Trust (Trust). SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("the Settlement Agreement") is made and entered into by and among the following parties as of the dates in which they signed this

More information

Case4:13-cv-05618-KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5

Case4:13-cv-05618-KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5 Case4:13-cv-056-KAW Document64 Filed12//14 Page1 of 5 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 1312 1 United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN 1548 2 Chief, Civil Division REBECCA A. F ALK (CSBN 6798 3 Assistant United States

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:12-CV-1179 STEVEN HEWETT, Plaintiff, v. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF KING Defendant, And THE AMERICAN LEGION AND AMERICAN

More information

2572-022cv UHL30.1 02.336176.1

2572-022cv UHL30.1 02.336176.1 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE CONVENTION CENTER PHASE III EXPANSION AND EXPANSION HOTEL PROJECT BY AND BETWEEN: CITY OF SAN DIEGO BRIGETTE BROWNING SERGIO GONZALES UNITE HERE LOCAL 30 2572-022cv UHL30.1

More information

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others

More information

State of California Department of Corporations

State of California Department of Corporations STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS Allied Cash Advance California, LLC dba Allied Cash Advance File # 0- and 0 locations NW th Street, Suite 00 Doral,

More information

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on

APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District

More information

BROKER AGREEMENT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter contain, the parties agree as follows:

BROKER AGREEMENT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of promises, covenants and agreements hereinafter contain, the parties agree as follows: THIS AGREEMENT is entered into in the State of California this day of 2006, between Crestline Funding Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Crestline Funding, and, hereinafter referred to as Broker.

More information

SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the

SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Separation Agreement and General Release ( this Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between ( Employee ) and ( the Agency ) (collectively, the Parties

More information

ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES

ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES 109 N. Palafox Street Telephone (850) 434-8904 Pensacola, Florida 32502 Fax (850) 434-8922 ATTORNEY CONSULTATION AND FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES THIS FEE CONTRACT FOR CONTINGENCY CASES ("Contract")

More information

CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:99-md-01309-PAM Document 490 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Lutheran Brotherhood Variable Insurance Products Company Sales Practices Litigation

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS AGREEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of Seattle ("City") and the Seattle Times Company ("Seattle Times"). Together, the Seattle Times and the City are

More information

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12

Case3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12 Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS ("the Settlement Agreement") is entered into this /-I day of February, 2015, by and between Sampson Contracting,

More information

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT COLLABORATION AGREEMENT This Collaboration Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Microryza Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ) and, a Delaware Corporation (the University ) (together with

More information

Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients

Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Agreement for Advisors Providing Services to Interactive Brokers Clients This Agreement is entered into between Interactive Brokers Hong Kong Ltd ("IB") and the undersigned

More information

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10

Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,

More information

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246

In re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 18, 2015 In re CRM Holdings, Ltd Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 CRH *P-CRH-POC/1* Control No: Claim

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.

More information

I (the "Policy"), which insured Hatfield according

I (the Policy), which insured Hatfield according I i SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of this {G/

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and on behalf of the Department of

More information

F.S.B. v. Equity Title of Nevada; Case No.2: 12-cv-00829 ("Action''). The Settling Defendant

F.S.B. v. Equity Title of Nevada; Case No.2: 12-cv-00829 (Action''). The Settling Defendant SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Settlement and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is made by, between, and among the following undersigned parties: The Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Fairness

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMEWHERE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 Harvey C. Berger (SBN POPE & BERGER 0 West "C" Street, Suite 0 San Diego, California 1 Telephone: (1-1 Facsimile: (1 - Marc D. Roberts (SBN LAW OFFICES OF MARC D. ROBERTS & ASSOCIATES 01 Centrelake

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This settlement agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between Wells Fargo

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This settlement agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between Wells Fargo SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This settlement agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between Wells Fargo Investments, LLC ( WFI ) and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, successor by merger to Wells Fargo Brokerage Services,

More information

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS

NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee

More information

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim

Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim As submitted to the Missouri Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Committee October 2004 Drafted by a Committee working group comprised

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245

More information

CLEARING MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT

CLEARING MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT CLEARING MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT DATED between LCH.CLEARNET LLC and LCH.CLEARNET LIMITED 17 State Street, 28th floor, New York, NY 10004 Telephone: +1 (212) 513-8282 Website: www.lchclearnet.com In consideration

More information

1. CLAIMANTTHE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for McINTOSH COMMERCIAL BANK its heirs, successors and assigns ("FDIC-R").

1. CLAIMANTTHE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for McINTOSH COMMERCIAL BANK its heirs, successors and assigns (FDIC-R). STATE OF TEXAS ) ) COUNTY OF DALLAS ) RELEASE DEFINITIONS 1. CLAIMANTTHE Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver for McINTOSH COMMERCIAL BANK its heirs, successors and assigns ("FDIC-R"). 2.

More information

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365

Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 Case: 1:12-cv-10064 Document #: 137 Filed: 07/29/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1365 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CAPITAL ONE TELEPHONE CONSUMER

More information

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT, LLC

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT, LLC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENT, LLC A MemberManaged Limited Liability Company OPERATING AGREEMENT THIS OPERATING AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective, 20, by and among: [list the

More information

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT

EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT Case 12-30885-hdh7 Doc 72 Filed 11/22/13 Entered 11/22/13 11:07:32 Page 15 of 27 EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT ALL PERSONS WHO PAID MONEY FOR A MEMBERSHIP IN LULLY S, INC. d/b/a THE RIGHT

More information

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368

Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW

More information

Agent Agreement WITNESSETH

Agent Agreement WITNESSETH PATRIOT NATIONAL UNDERWRITERS, INC. Agent Agreement THIS AGENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Patriot National Underwriters, Inc., a Texas corporation ( Patriot ), and

More information

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF YORK ) SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF YORK ) SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF YORK SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Rikki and Susan H. Terry, vs. Plaintiffs Matthew D. Lincoln; Jenna M. Lincoln; and J. Ramsey Enterprises,

More information

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :0-cv-00-LRS Document - Filed // 0 Toby J. Marshall, WSBA # Erika L. Nusser, WSBA #0 Attorneys for the Plaintiffs Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: tmarshall@tmdwlaw.com Email: enusser@tmdwlaw.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are a current or former user of PayPal in the United States who had an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November

More information

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM

United States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: All persons and entities which have paid the City of Ferndale (the City ) for water and sanitary sewage disposal services between January 22, 2008 and December

More information

RETAIL SALES FINANCING AGREEMENT. Dealer Name: Dealer Address: RECITALS

RETAIL SALES FINANCING AGREEMENT. Dealer Name: Dealer Address: RECITALS NATIONAL AUTO ACCEPTANCE RETAIL SALES FINANCING AGREEMENT This Retail Sales Financing Agreement ( Agreement ) between National Auto Acceptance, LLC ( National Auto ), a Louisiana limited liability company,

More information

Independent Contractor Agreement (Long Form)

Independent Contractor Agreement (Long Form) Independent Contractor Agreement (Long Form) This Agreement is made between Babson College ("College"), a Massachusetts non-profit corporation with a principal place of business at 231 Forest Street, Babson

More information

CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN RICHARD PENNER SELLER. and S&W SEED COMPANY BUYER

CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN RICHARD PENNER SELLER. and S&W SEED COMPANY BUYER EXHIBIT 10.1 CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN RICHARD PENNER as SELLER and S&W SEED COMPANY as BUYER CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS CUSTOMER LIST PURCHASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement )

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE Must Be Postmarked No Later Than November 6, 2015 In re Delcath Systems, Inc Securities Litigation c/o Garden City Group, LLC PO Box 10189 Dublin, OH 43017-3189 1-888-470-0243 wwwdelcathsecuritieslitigationcom

More information

Cash Advance Agreement (Case ID: )

Cash Advance Agreement (Case ID: ) Cash Advance Agreement (Case ID: ) THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this date,, between (hereinafter Seller ), residing in and Peacock Lending (hereinafter Purchaser ). Purchaser and Seller are collectively

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. PARTIES. This Settlement Agreement and Release ("the Settlement Agreement") is made by

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. PARTIES. This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement) is made by SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. PARTIES This Settlement Agreement and Release ("the Settlement Agreement") is made by and among (1) the United States Government, through the Department of Justice (the

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE 1.Definition of Terms. This Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Agreement or Release ) is executed by and between Isabel Santa ( Santa ) and Project Veritas,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE 1.Definition of Terms. This Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Agreement or Release ) is executed by and between Isabel Santa ( Santa ) and Project Veritas,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel., ) MELISSA THEIS and MELISSA THEIS, ) Individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 09 C 1943 v. ) )

More information

THESE FORMS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL ADVICE.

THESE FORMS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL ADVICE. DISCLAIMER The forms provided on our site were drafted by lawyers with knowledge of equine and contractual matters. However, the forms are not State specific. THESE FORMS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL

More information

SOLICITOR APPLICATION

SOLICITOR APPLICATION Date: / / SOLICITOR APPLICATION General Information Name: Birth Date: / / Office Address: City: State: Zip: E-mail address: Business phone: ( ) - Fax number: ( ) - Assistant s Name: Registered Investment

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF. Case No.

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF. Case No. FORM 10A.71 INTERIM FACTORING FINANCING ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF In re: In Proceedings Under Chapter 11 Case No. Debtor. INTERIM ORDER APPROVING SECTION 364 FINANCING

More information

Master Software Purchase Agreement

Master Software Purchase Agreement Master Software Purchase Agreement This Master Software Purchase Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into as of Wednesday, March 12, 2014 (the Effective Date ) by and between with principal offices at (

More information