1 1 APPENDIX A The PSID Sample and Family Income The sample for this analysis is 2,367 individuals who were between the ages of 0 and 18 in 1968 and have been tracked into adulthood through the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), an annual survey collecting information on family income and other characteristics. The PSID core sample includes an oversampling of low-income households (commonly referred to as the Survey of Economic Opportunity (SEO) sample) in addition to a regular cross-sectional national sample (the Survey Research Center (SRC) sample). Both components of the sample were included in the analysis, although twothirds of the low-income sample observations were dropped from the sample in 1997 as a cost-savings measure and thus were excluded from the analysis. The unit of analysis is the individual child. Individual survey weights were used to adjust for the likelihood of sample selection (given the purposeful oversampling of low-income households and the subsequent sample reduction) and also to adjust for non-random attrition. Despite these adjustments, the sample may suffer from non-random attrition, that is, individuals who have dropped out of the sample may differ from those who remain in the sample. The sample does not include immigrants who entered the country since 1968, nor does the analysis focus on generations born before 1950 or after Family cash income is the focus of the analysis, including taxable income (such as earnings, interest and dividends) and cash transfers (such as Social Security and welfare) of the head, spouse and other family members. The PSID definition of family, used in this analysis, includes single-person families and unmarried cohabiting couples who share resources, in addition to families related by blood, marriage or adoption. As discussed in Appendix B, family cash income does not include the value of non-cash compensation such as employer contributions to health insurance and retirement benefits, nor does it include the effect of taxes or non-cash benefits such as food stamps. All incomes are reported in 2006 dollars, using the CPI-U-RS to adjust for inflation. Parental family income is based on total family income averaged over five years, , following family income for the head of the family in which the child resided in This income is referred to as the child s parents income, although the sample includes children living with grandparents or other relatives and it includes income of all members of the family (head, spouse, and other family members). Average age of the children s parents was 40.9 at the time of survey interview ( ). Five-year averages are used as a proxy for lifetime income. Children s adult income is based on total family income (of the family in which the adult child resides), averaged over five years of income. Because the PSID shifted from annual to biennial data collection in the mid 1990s, the five years of data are collected over a seven-year interval (income in 1995, 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002). Family income data are collected at ages for the youngest children in the sample (those born in 1968) and ages for the oldest children (those 18 in 1968). Average age of the children was 39.4 at the time of survey interview ( ). Negative and zero incomes are bottom-coded to $1, and individuals with missing data for two or more years in either five-year period were dropped. As noted above, this restriction resulted in dropping the portion of the SEO sample that was discontinued in 1997.
2 2 APPENDIX B Non-Cash Contributions to Family Economic Well-Being Economic mobility is measured in this series by tracking changes in families cash income. While more comprehensive than earnings, family cash income does not account for fringe benefits, taxes, non-cash assistance and other factors affecting economic well-being. To what extent would mobility trends differ if these contributions were included? Absolute mobility would be higher with inclusion of the value of fringe benefits such as employer-provided health insurance, retirement benefits, vacation and sick leave. Employer contributions to retirement and health insurance were higher in the children s generation than the parents generation, totaling 7 percent of wages and salaries in and 13 percent in according to aggregate national data. 1 The inclusion of these benefits would increase upward mobility the most for those at the top; jobs at the top of the income distribution are more likely to provide these health and retirement benefits. Workers in the bottom half of the distribution have suffered from substantial declines in health insurance and pension coverage since Overall mobility is largely unchanged after an adjustment for federal taxes, but inequality is somewhat lessened. Taxes reduce disposable income, with the effect varying by family income. On average, federal taxes reduced average family income by 22.4 percent in the time period, varying from 27.5 percent for the top fifth to 5.7 percent for families in the bottom fifth, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The effective federal tax rate has fluctuated somewhat over time, but was roughly the same in 1979, the earliest year in the CBO study as in (22.2 compared to 22.4 percent). In other words, overall mobility is largely unchanged after adjustment for federal taxes, but inequality is somewhat lessened. Families at the bottom have experienced the largest reduction in tax rate, due to the expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit. 3 State and local sales, property and income taxes take a further bite out of family income, with a tax burden that is more evenly distributed across the income distribution. 4 Non-cash transfers, such as food stamps and subsidized housing, increase disposable income for the poorest families. Federal spending on food and housing benefits increased dramatically during the five-year period in which parental income was measured ( ) and has continued to grow since then. Spending per household on food and housing benefits grew by 53 percent between 1973 and 2003, a growth rate slightly higher than that for family incomes in the PSID sample. 5 In 2002, 5.6 percent of households received food stamp benefits averaging $1,784 over the year, 7.1 percent of households received a school lunch benefit averaging $695 and 4.6 percent of households received housing assistance averaging $2, Other adjustments that are included in some measures of disposable income can be both positive (such as returns to home equity and capital gains) and negative (such as child care and other work expenses). In sum, these additional measures add some refinement to the mobility picture. Comprehensive measures that include fringe benefits and non-cash government benefits suggests slightly higher growth rates than seen from cash income alone. In addition, post-tax, post-transfer measures suggest somewhat less inequality than depicted by pre-tax measures. 1 Council of Economic Advisers, 2007, Table B-28, p If one adds in employer contributions to government insurance, the ratio of non-wage compensation to wage compensation rises from 11.6 percent in to 20.7 percent in See Katz and Autor, 1998, Section 2.3, Total Compensation Inequality vs. Wage Inequality ; see also Pierce, Congressional Budget Office, McIntyre et al., Author s calculations based on expenditures from Congressional Research Service, 2006, Table 5 and population data from Census Bureau, 2007, Table Census Bureau, Table 7. Income of Households from Specified Sources, by Poverty Status: 2002.
3 3 However, the broader income measures show similar trends to cash income measures, namely, average family incomes have grown between the generations, with the most rapid income growth at the top fifth of the income distribution. For example, the CBO measure of after-tax, comprehensive household income shows a growth in annual income of 41 percent between 1979 and 2004, with a rate of 69 percent for the top fifth and 6 percent for the bottom fifth. Mean household income under CBO s disposable income measure was $62,900 in 2004, ranging from $14,700 for the bottom fifth to $155,200 for the top fifth. 7 7 Congressional Budget Office, Incomes are reported in 2004 dollars. The after-tax measure incorporates the effects of four major federal sources of revenue: individual income taxes, social insurance (payroll) taxes, corporate income taxes, and excise taxes. Comprehensive cash income is the sum of wages, salaries, self-employment income, rents, taxable and nontaxable interest, dividends, realized capital gains, cash transfer payments, and retirement benefits plus taxes paid by businesses (corporate income taxes and the employer s share of Social Security, Medicare, and federal unemployment insurance payroll taxes) and employee contributions to 401(k) retirement plans. Other sources of income include all in-kind benefits (Medicare, Medicaid, employerpaid health insurance premiums, food stamps, school lunches and breakfasts, housing assistance, and energy assistance).
4 4 APPENDIX C Four-Part Typology of Economic Mobility of Sons and Daughters It is important to demonstrate how men and women move beyond their parents in both absolute and relative terms. As shown in the Chapter V Economic Mobility of Men and Women, sons are slightly more likely than daughters to surpass the family incomes of their parents (69 percent compared to 64 percent), and there are fewer differences between men and women in relative movement up and down the income distribution. These two measures of mobility are integrated in a four-part mobility typology, presented in the table on the next page. It shows the following: About one-third of both sons and daughters are upwardly mobile in the sense of both getting ahead of their parents family income and moving ahead of their parents income ranking (36 percent of sons and 33 percent of daughters). Another one-fourth of sons and daughters are riding the tide and are making more than their parents but remain in the same economic position (27 percent of sons and 26 percent of daughters). As with all children, there is a small percentage (5 to 6 percent) of both sons and daughters who are falling despite the tide; although they have more income than their parents they fall behind their parents economic position. Daughters appear to be slightly more likely to be downwardly mobile than sons. More than one-third (36 percent) of daughters make less than their parents income and fall behind or remain at their parents economic position, compared to 31 percent of sons. Much of the observed differences between men and women are concentrated in the experiences of children in the bottom fifth. Almost two-thirds of men born to parents in the bottom fifth are upwardly mobile, while only half of women are.
5 5 Children s Chances of Experiencing both Absolute and Relative Mobility, by Parents Family Income and Gender (Percent in Each Category) MEN Parents Family Income Rank Bottom Second Middle Fourth Top All Children Upwardly Mobile Higher income and up 1 or more quintiles 65 % 55% 35% 27% N/A 1 36% Riding the Tide Higher income and same quintile Falling Despite the Tide Higher income and down 1 quintile N/A Downwardly Mobile Lower income and lower/same quintile Total WOMEN Parents Family Income Rank Bottom Second Middle Fourth Top All Children Upwardly Mobile Higher income and up 1 or more quintiles 53 % 49% 37% 25 % N/A 1 33 % Riding the Tide Higher income and same quintile Falling Despite the Tide Higher income and down 1 quintile N/A Downwardly Mobile Lower income and lower/same quintile Total Source: Brookings tabulations of PSID data. Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. 1 Those in the top quintile cannot meet this definition, because there is no quintile above the top quintile. 2 Those in bottom quintile cannot meet this definition, because there is no quintile below the bottom quintile. 3 Any observation with income exactly equal to parents is also classified as downwardly mobile. Source: PSID tabulations.
6 6 APPENDIX D Four-Part Typology: Economic Mobility of White and Black Families As a supplemental step in the analysis, the absolute and relative mobility measures presented in Chapter VI, Economic Mobility of Black and White Families, were integrated in a combined view to describe more fully how black and white Americans experience economic mobility. When the data are not controlled for income, there is not much difference in the mobility experiences of black and white Americans. 1 Overall, slightly more than one-third of both black and white children are upwardly mobile in the double sense of rising above their parents in dollar levels and moving up at least one income quintile, as shown in the table below. About one-fourth of both racial groups are riding the tide, that is, rising above parental income levels in inflationadjusted dollars, but without moving up an income quintile. A small group of individuals (6 percent of white children and 2 percent of black children) are falling despite the tide. They get ahead of their parents income in absolute terms but fall back one quintile. Finally, one-third or more are downwardly mobile, dropping below parents in both income level and income quintile. However, within income groups, there are large differences, with white children more upwardly mobile than black children. This contrast is illustrated by comparing children in the middle-income group. More than one-third of white children whose parents are in the middle quintile are upwardly mobile and one-third are downwardly mobile. Among black children from the middle quintile, however, only 17 percent are upwardly mobile and more than two-thirds (69 percent) are downwardly mobile. Similarly, white children in other income groups have higher rates of upward mobility than black children, while black children fall more heavily into the downwardly mobile category. 2 How is it possible for blacks to be so similar to whites in the overall mobility findings when they lag behind whites in upward mobility within income groups? As noted when discussing mobility findings in the chapter, the positive mobility results for all black children are driven by the large number of children in the bottom fifth of the income distribution, where likelihood of exceeding low parental income is fairly high for both racial groups. 1 There is no statistical significance between blacks and whites in the overall column, with the exception of the falling despite the tide category, where 2 percent of blacks is statistically different from 6 percent of whites. 2 The differences between blacks and whites in both upward mobility and downward mobility are statistically significant for every quintile except the fourth, where, as noted, estimates are imprecise due to small sample size.
7 7 White and Black Children s Chances of Experiencing both Absolute and Relative Mobility, by Parents Family Income (Percent Children in Each Category) WHITES Parents Family Income Rank Bottom Second Middle Fourth Top All Children Upwardly Mobile Higher income and up 1 or more quintiles 69% 58 % 37 % 26 % N/A (1) 34 % Riding the Tide Higher income and same quintile Falling Despite the Tide Higher income and down 1 quintile N/A (2) Downwardly Mobile Lower income and lower/same quintile (3) Total BLACKS Parents Family Income Rank Bottom Second Middle Fourth Top All Children Upwardly Mobile Higher income and up 1 or more quintiles 46% 26% 17% 11*% ** 37 % Riding the Tide Higher income and same quintile * ** 24 Falling Despite the Tide Higher income and down 1 quintile N/A (2) * ** 2 Downwardly Mobile Lower income and lower/same quintile (3) * ** 37 Total Source: Brookings tabulations of PSID data. Note: Totals may not add due to rounding. * Interpret data with caution due to small sample size. ** Too few observations to report. (1) Those in the top quintile cannot meet this definition of upwardly mobile, because there is no quintile above the top quintile. (2) Those in bottom quintile cannot meet this definition of downwardly mobile, because there is no quintile below the bottom quintile. (3) Any observation with income exactly equal to parents is also classified as downwardly mobile.
8 8 APPENDIX E Research Literature on Black-White Differences in Intergenerational Income Mobility How do the findings in this study on Black and White mobility compare to results of other researchers? And does multivariate research indicate whether the differences observed in simple cross-tabulations would remain if the analysis controlled not just for income, but also for a host of other parental characteristics? Preliminary responses to these questions are provided in the following brief review of the literature on black-white differences in intergenerational mobility. Economist Tom Hertz (2005, 2006) finds similar relative mobility patterns to those displayed in Figure 6, in Chapter VI, Economic Mobility of Black and White Families. In fact, his analyses, which include all individuals in the PSID who were born between 1942 and 1972, show even larger racial disparities, particularly with regard to black children being trapped in the bottom of the income distribution. From this pattern, he concludes that much of the overall intergenerational persistence of poverty in America is driven by the experience of black children. More generally, he argues that a key channel for the overall transmission of economic status from parents to children in the United States is the passing down of skin color and other characteristics that are correlated with race and that have social and economic consequences for their children. Two new studies also report large differences in relative mobility between black and white families. Debopam Bhattacharya and Bhashkar Mazumder (2007) find that blacks are less likely than whites to transition out of the bottom of the income distribution, based on analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Dalton Conley (forthcoming) reports on upward as well as downward mobility by race, and, consistent with this study, finds substantial downward mobility among black families with high incomes. Two studies of sibling correlations in earnings provide somewhat conflicting evidence about mobility differences by race. Anders Björklund and colleagues (2002) find that correlations in the United States drop from 0.43 to 0.32 (a drop of 0.11), when moving from the full PSID sample to a white-only sample, suggesting that race explains a sizable amount of the similarity of income between brothers in the United States. In a similar analysis of data from the National Longitudinal Surveys, David Levine and Bhashkar Mazumder (2007) find a somewhat smaller drop (of 0.04 to 0.07 depending on the time period), suggesting a smaller impact of race. With regard to the possible factors contributing to black-white differences in income mobility, Hertz (2006) finds that the income gap between blacks and whites in the second generation is reduced, but only from 33 percent to 28 percent, when controlling for a vast array of parental attributes not just parental income, but also parental education, family structure, annual hours worked by parents, homeownership, and parental attitudes and behaviors, among many others. After a number of different analyses, Hertz concludes that race itself is helping to determine economic outcomes for black children. He notes that he cannot distinguish whether this is a result of outright labor market discrimination, differences in quality of schooling, differential attitudes of children, or other unobserved factors. Bhattacharya and Mazumder (2007) find that cognitive skills of the second generation measured during adolescence explain much of the mobility gap between races, although they note their analysis does not explain the source of this difference in test scores. Drawing on the studies of Hertz and Björklund et al., Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis (2002) argue that race, along with wealth and schooling, is one of the three largest channels of intergenerational status transmission in the United States. In a review of literature from the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, Mary Corcoran (1995) also finds some evidence that lowincome status is passed down from black parents to black children, with race-based differences in economic outcomes only somewhat reduced when controlling for various background characteristics. Dalton Conley (1999) argues that the wealth gap between black and white families explains much of the persistence of other inequalities that persist across generations. Not only do blacks have much fewer assets than whites, but intergenerational transmission of wealth from parents to children is the largest factor explaining why whites have higher levels of wealth than blacks. This brief literature review is limited to the literature on intergenerational income mobility and race; the interested reader is also referred to the much larger literature on black-white differences in economic outcomes more generally.
ECONOMIC MOBILITY OF BLACK AND WHITE FAMILIES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The dream that one can rise up from humble beginnings and achieve a comfortable middle-class living, if not attain great wealth, transcends
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Percent 70 The Distribution of Household Income and Federal Taxes, 2008 and 2009 60 50 Before-Tax Income Federal Taxes Top 1 Percent 40 30 20 81st
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE 5:00 PM JULY 9, 2012 Pursuing the American Dream: Economic Mobility Across Generations The PEW Charitable Trusts Economic Mobility Project July 2012 The Pew Charitable Trusts is driven
MEASURING INCOME FOR DISTRIBUTIONAL ANALYSIS Joseph Rosenberg Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center July 25, 2013 ABSTRACT This document describes the income measure the Tax Policy Center (TPC) uses to analyze
VI ECONOMIC MOBILITY OF BLACK AND WHITE FAMILIES BY JULIA B. ISAACS, The Brookings Institution The belief that one s child will be better off than oneself is a foundation of the American Dream. The dream
MICHIGAN EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis Michigan Department of Treasury February 2015 MICHIGAN EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis Michigan Department
Technical Series Paper #09-03 Trends in Household Wealth Dynamics, 2005-2007 Elena Gouskova and Frank Stafford Survey Research Center - Institute for Social Research University of Michigan September, 2009
EMBARGOED UNTIL MAY 29, 2008 UPWARD INTERGENERATIONAL ECONOMIC MOBILITY IN THE UNITED STATES BY DR. BHASHKAR MAZUMDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is a product of the Economic Mobility Project and authored
Income Measurement in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Jessica S. Banthin and Thomas M. Selden Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No. 06005 July 2006 Suggested citation: Banthin
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey STATISTICAL BRIEF #40 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality May 2004 Health Insurance Coverage and Income Levels for the U.S. Noninstitutionalized Population under
How Much Do Americans Pay in Federal Taxes? April 15, 2014 One of the most hotly debated issues of our time is the fairness of our federal tax system. But too often, discussions are clouded and confused
Statistical Bulletin The Effects of Taxes and Benefits on Household Income, 2011/12 Coverage: UK Date: 10 July 2013 Geographical Area: UK and GB Theme: Economy Theme: People and Places Key points There
THE MAGNITUDE AND CAUSES OF ARIZONA S LOW PER CAPITA INCOME February 2010 Dennis Hoffman, Ph.D. Professor, Department of Economics; Director, L. William Seidman Research Institute; and Director, Office
Wealth and Demographics: Demographics by Wealth and Wealth by Demographics using the Survey of Consumer Finances *** DRAFT March 11, 2013 *** Jeff Thompson* Economist Microeconomic Surveys Federal Reserve
Online Appendix for Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality? by Mark Aguiar and Mark Bils In this appendix we describe construction of the variables in our data set and the impact of sample
RESEARCH SUMMARY Effects of Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Costs on Social Security Taxable Wages by Gary Burtless and Sveta Milusheva* The increasing cost of employer contributions for employee health
The Research SUPPLEMENTAL POVERTY MEASURE: 2010 Consumer Income Issued November 2011 P60-241 INTRODUCTION The current official poverty measure was developed in the early 1960s, and only a few minor changes
IWPR Publication #D487 March 2010 Social Security: Vital to Retirement Security for 35 Million Women and Men Jeff Hayes, Heidi Hartmann, and Sunhwa Lee This Briefing Paper examines major sources of income
cepr CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH briefing paper Defaulting on The Social Security Trust Fund Bonds: Winner and Losers Dean Baker 1 July 23, 2001 SUMMARY The United States government has never
The Effect of Taxes and Transfers on Income and Poverty in the United States: 2005 Consumer Income Issued March 2007 P60-232 INTRODUCTION losses, and work expenses) varies at a This report examines how
Liquidity Constraints in the U.S. Housing Market Denis Gorea Virgiliu Midrigan May 215 Contents A Income Process 2 B Moments 4 C Mortgage duration 5 D Cash-out refinancing 5 E Housing turnover 6 F House
Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S.: By Marina Vornovitsky, Alfred Gottschalck, and Adam Smith Household net worth, or wealth, is an important indicar of economic well-being in the United States.
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 firstname.lastname@example.org www.cbpp.org Revised February 27, 2014 Introduction to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Program
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate July 2006 EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS Improved Outreach
September 2012 No. 376 Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2012 Current Population Survey By Paul Fronstin, Ph.D., Employee Benefit Research Institute
Catalogue no. 75-001-XIE ON LABOUR AND INCOME JUNE 2002 Vol. 3, No. 6 HOUSING: AN INCOME ISSUE PENSIONS: IMMIGRANTS AND VISIBLE MINORITIES Statistics Canada Statistique Canada Sophie Lefebvre HOUSING IS
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 5.888 million Men: 2.842 million (48.3% of total) 3.046 million (51.7% of total) Married women: 3 1.646 million (28.0% of total; 54.0% of women) Unmarried
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 6.857 million Men: 3.204 million (46.7% of total) 3.654 million (53.3% of total) Married women: 3 1.850 million (27.0% of total; 50.6% of women) Unmarried
Occasional Studies A Comparative Analysis of Income Statistics for the District of Columbia ACS Income Estimates vs. DC Individual Income Tax Data Jayron Lashgari Office of Revenue Analysis Office of the
May 2015 United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Retirement Security, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, U.S. Senate
For release 10:00 a.m. (EDT) Tuesday, March 31, 2015 USDL-15-0528 Technical information: (202) 691-7410 email@example.com www.bls.gov/nls Media contact: (202) 691-5902 PressOffice@bls.gov NUMBER OF JOBS
How Financially Secure Are Young Retirees and Older Workers? FIGURE 1 Financial Status of People Age 51 to 59, by Work Status THOUSS OF DOLLARS 14 1 8 6 $82 RETIREES WORKERS $99 4 $41 $24 MEDIAN MEDIAN
The Risk of Losing Health Insurance Over a Decade: New Findings from Longitudinal Data Executive Summary It is often assumed that policies to make health insurance more affordable to the uninsured would
The Impact on Inequality of Raising the Social Security Retirement Age David Rosnick and Dean Baker April 2012 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Building assets and avoiding excessive debt can help low-income families insure against unforeseen disruptions, achieve economic independence, and improve socio-economic status. Assets
Issue Brief August 2015 Young Black America Part Four: The Wrong Way to Close the Gender Wage Gap By Cherrie Bucknor* Young blacks in America have had significant improvements in educational attainment
MASSACHUSETTS Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Massachusetts. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research on Higher Education, Graduate
Profile of Rural Health Insurance Coverage A Chartbook R H R C Rural Health Research & Policy Centers Funded by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy www.ruralhealthresearch.org UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN
ARTICLE OCTOBER 2013 Marriage and divorce: patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79), this article examines s and divorces
Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States (Updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates) Emmanuel Saez March 2, 2012 What s new for recent years? Great Recession 2007-2009 During the
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 firstname.lastname@example.org www.cbpp.org September 14, 2011 POVERTY RATE SECOND-HIGHEST IN 45 YEARS; RECORD NUMBERS LACKED HEALTH
ICI RESEARCH PERSPECTIVE 1401 H STREET, NW, SUITE 1200 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 202-326-5800 WWW.ICI.ORG OCTOBER 2014 VOL. 20, NO. 6 WHAT S INSIDE 2 Introduction 2 Which Workers Want Retirement Benefits? 2
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 email@example.com www.cbpp.org January 5, 2011 DESPITE DEEP RECESSION AND HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT EFFORTS INCLUDING
Middle-Income Tax Rates: Trends and Prospects By Troy A. Davig and C. Alan Garner Benjamin Franklin observed that nothing in life is certain except death and taxes. But he was referring to the existence
September 2013 No. 390 Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2013 Current Population Survey By Paul Fronstin, Ph.D., Employee Benefit Research Institute
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters February 2006 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION Employer Spending on Benefits Has Grown Faster Than Wages, Due Largely to Rising
Making Jobs Good John Schmitt and Janelle Jones April 2013 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net CEPR Making Jobs
First draft September 29, 2009 Health Care, Health Insurance, and the Distribution of American Incomes by Gary Burtless THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Washington, DC Pavel Svaton L ÉCOLE D ÉCONOMIE DE TOULOUSE
An Equity Profile of the Kansas City Region PolicyLink and PERE An Equity Profile of the Kansas City Region Summary Overview Across the country, regional planning organizations, community organizations
Child Support Computation 03EN025I Purpose of form The purpose of the Child Support Computation form is to calculate a child support obligation pursuant to 43 O.S. Sections 118A 118I, effective July 1,
September 2010 No. 347 Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2010 Current Population Survey By Paul Fronstin, Employee Benefit Research Institute LATEST
Middle Income Households, 1977-2010/11 Coverage: UK Date: 18 March 2013 Geographical Area: UK Theme: Economy Theme: People and Places Key points This short article analyses some of the key trends affecting
Where Have All the Good Jobs Gone? John Schmitt and Janelle Jones July 2012 Center for Economic and Policy Research 1611 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20009 202-293-5380 www.cepr.net
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 13.879 million Men: 6.551 million (47.2% of total) 7.327 million (52.8% of total) Married women: 3 3.689 million (26.6% of total; 50.4% of women) Unmarried
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 3.732 million Men: 1.849 million (49.5% of total) 1.883 million (50.5% of total) Married women: 3 1.053 million (28.2% of total; 55.9% of women) Unmarried
Lesson Description The lead article in the spring 2010 issue of Inside the Vault discusses the redistribution of wealth through taxation. In this lesson, students use different household scenarios to examine
Economic inequality and educational attainment across a generation Mary Campbell, Robert Haveman, Gary Sandefur, and Barbara Wolfe Mary Campbell is an assistant professor of sociology at the University
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2016 RETIREMENT SECURITY Better Information on Income Replacement Rates Needed to Help Workers Plan for Retirement
Education and Wage Differential by Race: Convergence or Divergence? * Tian Luo Thesis Advisor: Professor Andrea Weber University of California, Berkeley Department of Economics April 2009 Abstract This
Working Beyond Retirement-Age Kelly A. Holder and Sandra L. Clark U.S. Census Bureau Housing and Household Economics Division Labor Force Statistics Branch Presented at the American Sociological Association
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 15 Volume Author/Editor: James M. Poterba, editor Volume
Why Some Tax Units Pay No Income Tax Rachel Johnson, James Nunns, Jeffrey Rohaly, Eric Toder, Roberton Williams Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center July 2011 ABSTRACT About 46 percent of American households
The government s economic objective of equity in the distribution personal income basically means that it is striving for a fair, but not necessarily equal, share of income to be distributed to all members
The 2006 Earnings Public-Use Microdata File: An Introduction by Michael Compson* This article introduces the 2006 Earnings Public-Use File (EPUF) and provides important background information on the file
Research perspective 1401 H Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005 202/326-5800 www.ici.org November 2010 Vol. 16, No. 2 A Look at Private-Sector Retirement Plan Income After ERISA Key Findings Retirement
A Guide to Planning for Retirement INVESTMENT BASICS SERIES It s Never Too Early to Start What You Need to Know About Saving for Retirement Most of us don t realize how much time we may spend in retirement.
Statement of Linda J. Blumberg, Ph.D. Senior Fellow The Urban Institute Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations United States House of Representatives Hearing: The
Men retiring early: How retiring are they doing? early: How are they doing? Dave Gower During the first half of this century, men generally stayed in the labour force until at least age 65. In the second
IWPR #C411 January 2014 How Equal Pay for Working Women would Reduce Poverty and Grow the American Economy* Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D., Jeffrey Hayes, Ph.D., and Jennifer Clark Persistent earnings inequality
Iowa s Earned Income Tax Credit Tax Credits Program Evaluation Study December 2011 Revised February 2012 By Zhong Jin Bob Rogers Tax Research and Program Analysis Section Iowa Department of Revenue Preface
The Effects of ACA on Income Eligibility for Medicaid and Subsidized Private Insurance Coverage: Income Definitions and Thresholds across CPS and Administrative Data Ithai Z. Lurie * Office of Tax Analysis
HEALTH ECONOMICS PROGRAM Health Insurance Coverage in Minnesota: Results from the 2015 Minnesota Health Access Survey FEBRUARY 29 2016 As Minnesota and the nation saw increases in health insurance coverage
Income Real Mean and Median Income, Families and Individuals, 1947-2012, and Households, 1967-2012 (Reported in $2012). $80,000 $60,000 Median Family Income Mean Family Income Median Household Income Mean
Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2011 Current Population Reports By Timothy Grall Issued October 2013 P60-246 IntroductIon This report focuses on the child support income that custodial
4. Work and retirement James Banks Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London María Casanova Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London Amongst other things, the analysis
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 13.611 million Men: 6.460 million (47.5% of total) 7.150 million (52.5% of total) Married women: 3 3.237 million (23.8% of total; 45.3% of women) Unmarried
Employment-Based Health Insurance: 2010 Household Economic Studies Hubert Janicki Issued February 2013 P70-134 INTRODUCTION More than half of the U.S. population (55.1 percent) had employment-based health
1 I. Population, 18 years and older, 2014 2 Total: 16.844 million Men: 8.076 million (47.9% of total) 8.767 million (52.1% of total) Married women: 3 4.443 million (26.4% of total; 50.7% of women) Unmarried
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 1-7-2009 Pension Issues: Lump-Sum Distributions and Retirement Income Security Patrick Purcell Congressional
MARCH 2012 Updated Estimates for the Insurance Coverage Provisions of the Affordable Care Act In preparing the March 2012 baseline budget projections, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the staff
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT ENTRY-LEVEL, HOURLY EMPLOYEES? Families and Work Institute November 2006 Supporting Entry-Level, Hourly Employees is a project of the Families and Work Institute (FWI) and the Institute
John Keel, CPA State Auditor A Report on State Employee Benefits as a Percentage of Total Compensation Report No. 14-704 A Report on State Employee Benefits as a Percentage of Total Compensation Overall
Chair Pomeroy and Members, Social Security has met the social insurance promise to ensure workers will not have to live in old age poverty. This promise needs to be guaranteed for current and future workers.
Technical Series Paper #12-02 Mortgage Distress and Financial Liquidity: How U.S. Families are Handling Savings, Mortgages and Other Debts Frank Stafford, Bing Chen and Robert Schoeni Survey Research Center,
September 2015 Would a significant increase in the top income tax rate substantially alter income inequality? William G. Gale, Melissa S. Kearney, and Peter R. Orszag Executive Summary The high level of
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.