1 Towards a Fragmented Neighbourhood: Policies of the EU and Russia and their consequences for the area that lies in between Laure Delcour and Hrant Kostanyan No. 17 / 17 October 2014 T he ongoing crisis in Ukraine not only challenges the country s stability, sovereignty and integrity, it is also the culmination of the increasingly open rivalry between the European Union and Russia over their common neighbourhood. Competition between Brussels and Moscow has crystallised in the region around two mutually exclusive integration projects, the Eastern Partnership and the Eurasian Customs Union. The current crisis involves much more than just the rivalry between two economic integration projects, however. It has its roots in two interconnected factors. First, the (mis-) perceptions that developed between Russia and the West (the EU, especially NATO and the US) after the collapse of the USSR paved the way for confrontation rather than cooperation. Second, the crisis stems from actions taken by Russia as a result of these perceptions. In other words, Russia has made systematic attempts to destabilise the countries seeking closer integration with the EU and NATO, and has increasingly used coercion to safeguard its influence in the post-soviet space. While the outcome of current events in Ukraine remains uncertain, the escalation of the conflict is not only likely to damage the EU-Russia partnership, it will also lead to a loselose situation in the region that divides countries between those choosing EU integration and those engaging in the Russian-led Eurasian integration project. Laure Delcour is a Senior Research Fellow and IRIS (Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques) Scientific coordinator, EU-FP7 project Exploring the Security-Democracy Nexus in the Caucasus, CASCADE (www.cascade-caucasus.eu). Hrant Kostanyan is an Associate Research Fellow at CEPS and a Special Research Fund Fellow at the Centre of EU Studies at Ghent University. CEPS Essays offer scholarly observations and personal insights into topics of critical importance in European affairs. The views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. Available for free downloading from the CEPS website (www.ceps.eu) Laure Delcour and Hrant Kostanyan, 2014 Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1 B-1000 Brussels Tel: (32.2)
2 2 DELCOUR & KOSTANYAN The EU-Russia common neighbourhood has never truly been a shared neighbourhood. Over the past year, it seems to have already turned into a divided neighbourhood where partner countries are compelled to choose between two actors competing for influence. But ultimately, the Ukrainian crisis is likely to turn the area into a fragmented neighbourhood; a highly unstable and volatile region with changing and overlapping external influences and shifting loyalties. From suspicion to confrontation in the common neighbourhood: Russian and EU (mis)perceptions The newly appointed EU foreign affairs chief, Federica Mogherini, indicated recently that because of its role in the Ukrainian crisis Russia is no longer a strategic partner for the EU. 1 But has Russia ever been a strategic partner in the common neighbourhood? While the confrontation between the EU and Russia came to a head in Ukraine last year, Russia has not always acted with intent to thwart the EU s initiatives in the post-soviet space and the former Eastern bloc. In particular, Russia initially perceived the EU as being decoupled from other Western organisations widely viewed as hostile, such as NATO. After the collapse of the USSR, while NATO was viewed as an unnecessary legacy of the past, the EU came to be seen as a major partner in Russia s reform process. True, even before the EU s 2004 enlargement was complete Russia pointed out the possible negative consequences of EU expansion for its economic interests, and viewed its impact with ambivalence. 2 However, while Russia fiercely opposed NATO s enlargement towards its borders, it did not resist the expansion of the EU with the same degree of vehemence. Instead, in the early 2000s Moscow showed considerable interest in developing a strategic partnership with the EU. 3 Russia s interests were not confined to trade and energy. Clearly, by that time the EU was also perceived in Moscow as a potential partner to establish an effective system of collective security in Europe on the basis of equality without dividing lines ; 4 something that in Russia s view has failed to happen since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Nevertheless, the partnership that developed with Brussels in the early 2000s was underpinned by false premises 5 and misperceptions. From the outset the EU-Russia strategic partnership has been fraught with inherent tensions and misperceptions regarding the common neighbourhood. From the EU side, it was based on the assumption that Russia was a soon-to-be democracy sharing EU values and interests and that it could act as a responsible partner in the common neighbourhood. From Russia s side, it was premised on two connected postulates: the weakness of the EU as a security actor and its low profile in the post-soviet space. The creation of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) in Mogherini: Russia is no longer the EU s strategic partner, Euractiv, 02 September 2014 (http://www.euractiv.com/sections/global-europe/mogherini-russia-no-longer-eus-strategicpartner ). 2 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (1999), Russia s Middle-Term Strategy towards the EU ( ). 3 Ibid. and Joint Statement of the EU-Russia Summit, Saint-Petersburg, 31 May 2003 (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/er/75969.pdf). 4 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (1999), Russia s Middle-Term Strategy towards the EU ( ). 5 H. Haukkala (2008), False Premises, Sound Principles: The Way Forward in EU-Russia relations, FIIA Briefing Paper No. 20.
3 TOWARDS A FRAGMENTED NEIGHBOURHOOD 3 was the first blow to the latter. Russia initially criticised the ENP for being founded on EU norms and conditionality, which the country has clearly rejected in its own relationship with the EU. The Rose, and especially the Orange, revolutions set off alarm bells in Russia, signalling a loss of influence in the post-soviet sphere and a corresponding (in Moscow s eyes) Western assertiveness in the region. The ENP thus came to be seen as an intrusion into Russia s near abroad an area that the country was clearly not prepared to discuss with the EU under the Roadmap on External Security established in 2005 as part of the strategic partnership. The Eastern Partnership clearly marked a shift in Russia s perceptions of the EU. The initiative was launched by Poland and Sweden in 2008 in a context of marked deterioration in relations between Russia, the US and NATO over the latter s possible expansion to Georgia and Ukraine; the independence of Kosovo; and finally the war in Georgia. Against this backdrop, the shift to hard-law integration under the Eastern Partnership has been perceived in Moscow as a bold move bearing potential regional integration effects. This is because Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTAs) and many sectoral chapters of the Association Agreements (AAs), in particular, imply a drastic shift towards the EU s legal framework, and ultimately integration into the EU s internal market. Clearly, the breadth and depth of the integration process foreseen by the Eastern Partnership has been a major source of concern to Russia ever since the initiative was launched. For Russia, converging with the acquis also means a shift away from what ties these countries have with Moscow. The EU thus became increasingly coupled with NATO in Russia s perception. When the Eastern Partnership s offer materialised, with the negotiation of four AAs and DCFTAs, Russia adopted an overtly confrontational position vis-à-vis the EU. Russia s policies in the common neighbourhood: from reluctant observer to active saboteur In recent years, Russia s actions in Ukraine, Moldova and the South Caucasus have been driven by one overarching goal: retaining influence in the former Soviet Republics. Yet the way in which Moscow has sought to achieve this goal has substantially evolved in response to the EU s growing attractiveness. A decade ago, when the EU was still a newcomer in the region, Russia did little more than rely on existing ties between post-soviet countries to maintain its stronghold. In contrast to the 1990s and early 2000s, Russia is now systematically using these ties coercively, either as a mechanism to block further progress in the integration process with the European Union, or as a lever to induce post-soviet countries into the Eurasian integration project. In essence, over the past few months Russia has been creating instability in countries of the common neighbourhood with a view to (re)gaining long-term control over the region, inter alia through Eurasian integration. Russia s hegemony in the post-soviet space: embedded in the past Arguably, retaining its hold over the former Soviet Republics should be an easy task for Moscow. As a result of their shared tsarist and Soviet past, Russia is immensely influential in the region. The Russian language is still, and will remain for some time, the lingua franca there. Its predominance is further sustained by the widespread dissemination of Russian media. Russia is a key trading partner for most, if not all, post-soviet states. At present, its market is broadly accessible to countries that share the legacy of Soviet standards and struggle to meet World Trade Organisation (WTO) requirements. Mobility and migration are still other instruments of Russian influence. Over the past two decades Russia s neighbourhood has largely remained visa-free and Russia s labour market is attractive both
4 4 DELCOUR & KOSTANYAN because of its size and the lack of obstacles to mobility. Remittances from migrants working in Russia significantly contribute to their countries economies, as is the case in Armenia, Moldova and Tajikistan, for instance. Last but not least, Russia has a military presence in a number of post-soviet countries, including in most countries of the common neighbourhood. In essence, Russia could effectively maintain its hegemony by doing nothing more than rely upon its capital of influence. While the bulk of this capital derives from the past, in the common neighbourhood path dependence provides Russia with a strong lever compared to the EU. Beyond the narrow circle of policy-makers and experts who negotiated the association agreements, citizens in partner countries actually know very little of the EU, whereas they are wholly familiar with Russia. In contrast to the EU, the lack of the abovementioned obstacles to trade and mobility (i.e. different standards, quotas, visas) makes it (theoretically) very easy for these countries to export to Russia and to travel there. In other words, EU trade and mobility barriers, as well as exacting requirements in the short term are only likely to result in boosting Russia s immediate leverage over its partner countries. Nevertheless, Russia has little credibility in the region as a model of development a feature that is also connected to the shortcomings of its own transformation process; this is precisely what the EU offers to the common neighbourhood with the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. 6 While these initiatives do not include a membership perspective at the moment, they could have a transformative effect and offer guidance and support in the reform process. In the region, the EU is thus widely seen as a template for modernisation and prosperity, 7 while Russia has little legitimacy in this respect. In Moscow s view, this gap constitutes a threat, since the EU s growing attractiveness entails (from Russia s perspective) decreasing Russian influence. Eurasian integration as a long-term project to (re)gain control over the post- Soviet space This has moved the issue of the post-soviet region to the very top of Russia s foreign policy agenda and prompted the Kremlin to give a strong impetus to its own integration project, namely the Customs Union and the future Eurasian Economic Union. In essence, the Customs Union (initiated in 2006 and launched in 2010) 8 is a major turning point in Russia s policies in its neighbourhood. Whereas until then Russia conducted pragmatic policies driven by short-term motivations and instruments, the future Eurasian Economic Union 9 was conceived as a long-term project meant to cement ties among post-soviet countries 6 L. Delcour and K. Wolczuk (2013), Beyond the Vilnius Summit. Challenges for deeper economic integration with Eastern Europe, European Policy Centre, Brussels. 7 See e.g. the discourse by President Sargsyan at the Eastern Partnership Vilnius summit: Building and strengthening Armenian nationhood upon a European model has been the conscious choice of ours and that process is hence irreversible. Our major objective is to form such mechanisms with the European Union that on the one hand would reflect the deep nature of our social-political and economic relationship, and on the other would be compatible with other formats of co-operation. Speech at the 3rd Eastern Partnership Summit, Vilnius, 29 November 2013 (http://www.president.am/en/press-release/item/2013/11/29/president-serzh-sargsyan-speechat-the-third-eastern-partnership-summit/). 8 N. Popescu (2014), Eurasian Union: the Real, the Imaginary and the Likely, Chaillot Paper No. 132, September. 9 The Treaty creating the Eurasian Economic Union was signed on 29 May The Union will be launched in January 2015.
5 TOWARDS A FRAGMENTED NEIGHBOURHOOD 5 through wide-ranging and far-reaching integration. In other words, it is an initiative that draws upon post-soviet legacies and ties, yet embeds them in the present to build a common future. 10 Undoubtedly, the Customs Union differs in scope, depth and pace from previous attempts at regional cooperation in the post-soviet sphere. 11 It aims to create a Eurasian Economic Union only five years after the Customs Union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan was launched and three years after the Common Economic Space between the three countries came into force. While much remains to be done to consolidate and expand Eurasian integration, the way in which Russia has tried to expand the Customs Union is undoubtedly an attempt to thwart the EU s Eastern Partnership. Indeed, the Eurasian Customs Union cannot be combined with DCFTAs. In principle, the countries in the EU-Russia common neighbourhood can sign the DCFTA with the EU and negotiate and sign another free trade agreement with the Russianled Customs Union. However, the Kremlin pressured post-soviet countries for full membership of the Eurasian Customs Union instead of a mere free trade agreement. Yet, full membership in the Customs Union and a DCFTA with the EU are mutually exclusive. This is primarily because membership of the Customs Union implies a loss of sovereignty of member countries over trade policy and sets common tariffs that are incompatible with the elimination of tariffs planned under the DCFTA. With the Eurasian integration project Russia is de facto compelling countries in the common neighbourhood to choose between the two projects. Coercion at the core of Russian power The Eurasian project adopted the language of the EU integration process, yet differences are substantial in terms of institutions, legal bases and policies. An assessment of background, formation and process conditions of economic integration reveals that conditions for EU-like integration are not favourable in the post-soviet region. 12 However, the main difference between the two projects lies in the method of, and approach to, integration. The European integration process has been of a voluntary nature and enlargement, in particular, derives from the EU s attractiveness for non-members. In contrast, Russia has extensively used coercion to induce new members to join and to deter Eastern partners from progressing further towards EU integration. Clearly, the Kremlin does not run the Eurasian integration process as a mutually beneficial partnership for all member states. While Russia is in principle constrained by multilateral arrangements, since it cannot impose any decisions alone, the Customs Union is to a large extent asymmetrical. Even though Belarus and Kazakhstan have a say in the Eurasian Customs Union s institutional arrangements, they have de facto limited latitude to oppose Russia, given the latter s leverage both in the Eurasian Customs Union s multilateral framework and in its bilateral relations with Astana and Minsk. Yet while participation in the Customs Union may ultimately lead to some economic modernisation for Belarus (owing to the adoption of WTO-compliant standards), it results in increased tariffs and some 10 V. Putin (2011) «Новый интеграционный проект для Евразии будущее, которое рождается сегодня», [ New integration project for Eurasia A future born today ], 3 October (http://izvestia.ru/news/502761). 11 R. Dragneva and K. Wolczuk (2012), The Eurasian Customs Union and the EU: Cooperation, Stagnation or Rivalry?, Chatham House Briefing Paper. 12 S. Blockmans, H. Kostanyan and E. Vorobiov (2012), Towards a Eurasian Economic Union: The challenge of integration and unity, CEPS Special Report No. 75, Brussels, December.
6 6 DELCOUR & KOSTANYAN evidence of trade diversion 13 for Kazakhstan. Both Minsk and Astana are also reluctant to lose their political autonomy and opposed the inclusion of political clauses in the Treaty of the Eurasian Economic Union, scheduled to kick off on 1 January Moreover, the quest to expand the membership of the Eurasian Customs Union has also been driven by Russia s power vis-à-vis prospective members. This is particularly the case in Central Asia. In principle, Russia is in a good position to induce Bishkek and Dushanbe to join the Customs Union. It can rely upon powerful leverages, inter alia the remittances of Tajik and Kyrgyz migrant workers from Russia, which in 2012 amounted to 19.6% and 45% of their GDP respectively. Yet in December last year Kyrgyzstan made it clear that it would not join the Customs Union based upon a roadmap that was prepared without its involvement 14, thus implying that the document was imposed by Moscow. Kyrgyzstan requested a new roadmap, taking into account the country s interests. Nowhere has Russia used more coercion than in its common neighbourhood. In the run-up to the Vilnius summit, tangible progress toward EU integration (with negotiations for Association Agreements and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements being finalised with Armenia, Georgia and Moldova, signature expected with Ukraine) prompted Russia to destabilise these countries with a view to actively undermining the Eastern Partnership. Generating instability in the common neighbourhood Armenia, whose president signed an agreement to join the Eurasian Economic Union on 10 October 2014, has drastically altered its foreign policy under Russian pressure. The country successfully negotiated an Association Agreement including the DCFTA with the EU, which was supposed to act as a blueprint for modernisation. However, Russia s leverage (based on a combination of its role as security guarantor for Armenia and as an insecurity-provider through massive arms deliveries to Azerbaijan, the threat of increased energy prices and political pressures on the Armenian president) was instrumental in the country s decision to join the Eurasian Customs Union instead. Armenia will now have to increase its external tariff from an average 2.9 % to 7.02 % after its entry into the Eurasian Economic Union; it will also have to reconsider its WTO commitments. The Armenian government asked for almost 900 exemptions from external tariffs. This high number reflects Armenian concerns about the economic consequences of Eurasian Union accession. Moreover, if the exemptions are not granted, Armenian membership to the Russia-led Custom Union will greatly add to its economic difficulties. In the run-up to, and in the wake of, the Vilnius summit Russia has also used pressure to undermine further progress of EU integration in Georgia, such as through threatening to suspend the 1994 free trade agreement and through borderisation, namely the construction of barricades along the administrative border with South Ossetia and the gradual expansion of the territory by moving the fences. For Moldova the pressure amounts to introducing an embargo on Moldovan wine in September 2013, and on fruit and vegetables in July 2014; supporting the organisation of a referendum on EU integration and Eurasian Customs Union in the autonomous region of Gagauzia in February 2014; instrumentalising the Transnistrian conflict and introducing amendments to migration law that may result in the return of the Moldovan migrants working in Russia. 13 I. Dreyer and N. Popescu (2014), The Eurasian Customs Union: the economics and the politics, EUISS Brief No Kyrgyz President Rejects Current Customs-Union Road Map, RFERL, 08 October 2014 (http://www.rferl.org/content/kyrgyzstan-rejects-customs-union-map/ html).
7 TOWARDS A FRAGMENTED NEIGHBOURHOOD 7 But it is in Ukraine that Russia has pushed the destabilisation process to its limits. As early as in August 2013 Moscow started deploying instruments (custom checks, trade blockades) to push Ukraine towards joining the Eurasian Customs Union and to counter what it perceived as Ukraine s irreversible move towards the EU through the signature of the Association Agreement. Yet with the ousting of President Yanukovych and the appointment of an interim government perceived to be hostile, Russia changed tactics and shifted towards undermining the country s integrity and sovereignty first by annexing Crimea and second by providing military support to separatists in south-eastern regions. Clearly, destabilisation has borne fruit in the short term. Russia has been able to counter the EU integration process in Armenia; it acts as a spoiler in Georgia and especially in Moldova and it has deeply undermined Ukraine s stability and sovereignty. As a result the common neighbourhood now looks deeply divided between EU and Russian regional initiatives. In response to the signature of Association Agreements with the EU, Russia has retaliated by banning Moldovan meat and Ukrainian dairy products. Yet the methods currently used by Moscow are ultimately likely to damage Russia s main instrument to (re)gain control in the long term, i.e. the Eurasian integration process. By using coercion Russia also alienates those partner countries (e.g. Georgia and Moldova) that have so far been able to resist its pressure to further engage in the European integration process. By resorting to punitive measures like embargos and deporting migrants, Russia also endangers the existing ties with post-soviet countries, which are forced to look for new markets elsewhere. 15 And by cutting off gas supplies to Ukraine, it prompts the country to diversify energy sources (e.g. by studying the feasibility of reverse flows from the EU) and to engage further in energy savings. Moscow s involvement in the war in Ukraine and the manipulation of the crisis allowed the Kremlin to force Kyiv to divert resources away from the implementation of reforms agreed with the EU. Meanwhile, the ceasefire remains fragile and is under daily threat of collapse. More importantly, through the Minsk Memorandum the Kremlin even managed to push Kyiv and Brussels into an agreement to delay the implementation (in part) of the DCFTA. Having obtained this concession, Moscow insisted that any future reform in Ukraine in line with the DCFTA would be considered as a violation of the Minsk Memorandum. The Kremlin was successful in annexing Crimea and stirring up conflict in parts of Donbas. However, the upcoming elections in Ukraine are likely to result in an anti-russian parliament and Russia s relationship with Ukraine has been severely damaged. In sum, by fomenting instability in Ukraine and the rest of the neighbourhood in the short term, Russia may act against its own interests in the long term. Victory in several small battles may well result in the loss of the war. A two dimensional strategy for the EU in its Eastern Neighbourhood The EU should respond to Russia s role as a spoiler through becoming both more selfcritical; more reflexive vis-à-vis its own policies and more responsive vis-à-vis Russia s initiatives. 15 D. Cenusa, M. Emerson, T. Kovziridse and V. Movchan (2014), Russia s Punitive Trade Policy Measures towards Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia, CEPS Working Document No. 400, Brussels.
8 8 DELCOUR & KOSTANYAN A more flexible EU A key parameter for the effectiveness of the ENP/EaP is for the EU to critically analyse both the effects of its policies on partner countries and the way in which they interact with existing regional ties. The Eastern Partnership initiative comes laden with a massive legal approximation with EU acquis under the AAs/DCFTAs, requiring the adoption of more than 300 EU directives and regulations, including most of the EU trade-related acquis communautaire. 16 However, the requirements put forward by the EU carry broader economic and societal implications for the countries where the level of development is significantly lower. For instance, while likely to result in increased food security and modernisation for the agricultural sector over the long term, EU demands in terms of food safety standards also imply a complete transformation of partner countries approach to food safety in a very short time span. 17 Clearly, both the focus on regulatory approximation and the substance of EU requirements are not well suited to partner countries current development needs. The acquis was designed by EU member states for their own needs, i.e. for economies with a different level of development. Therefore, its effectiveness beyond the enlargement context - i.e. as a foreign policy tool - may be questioned if it is used without flexibility towards partner countries. Moreover, the EU s financial support and technical assistance are not likely to offer sufficient compensation for the short-term losses. The amount of EU aid per capita (ENPI commitments, ) ranges from between approximately 3 for Ukraine and 19 for Moldova annually; 18 and the main recipients have been partner countries administrations, while the private sector (which has to implement most of DCFTA obligations) has been overlooked. 19 This mismatch actually weakens the EU s offer and only makes it more vulnerable to domestic shifts or regional pressure. Domestically the shortterm costs to be incurred as part of the reforms might create socio-economic problems for the current political elites among the Eastern neighbours, which in turn will make them more vulnerable to Russian pressure. The EU s lack of sensitivity to domestic needs and contexts only makes it more difficult for partner countries in a complex regional environment. The EU has recently understood this, as demonstrated by the decisions to lift its quotas on Moldovan wines in response to the Russian embargo, as well as all restrictions on the accession of Ukrainian goods to EU markets. Flexibility thus starts with the national context in which EU policies are embedded. Instead of imposing a one-size-fits-all conditionality that does not take into account partners specificities, the EU should aim at a profound diversification of its relations with all the countries in its neighbourhood. Arguably, the Eastern Partnership now includes a degree of differentiation, with three countries having signed AAs and DCFTAs while the three remaining countries have not. Yet this differentiation is still too rough and there are major differences within each group. Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia are at very different stages of economic and political reform and they face different problems. However, the AAs and the DCFTAs signed with them are largely similar and do not take into account the specificities of the partners. This calls for increased EU attention and adjustment during the 16 M. Emerson (2014), Trade policy issues in the wider Europe that led to war and not yet peace, CEPS Working Document No. 398, Brussels. 17 EU-Moldova Association Agreement, Title 5, Chapter L. Delcour (2012), Improving EU Aid to its Neighbours, briefing for the European Parliament AFET Committee. 19 L. Delcour and K. Wolczuk (2013), Beyond the Vilnius Summit, op. cit.
9 TOWARDS A FRAGMENTED NEIGHBOURHOOD 9 implementation phase. Even more striking are differences between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus. Yet they are now lumped together in the group of unwilling Eastern partners, while the factors behind their reluctance differ substantially. Tailored proposals and tangible offers are needed for those Eastern Partnership countries that are unwilling and/or unable to embark on the path of comprehensive association with the EU. The EU will enhance the effectiveness of its policies by taking into account the specific context in which they are embedded. A more responsive EU Ultimately, what the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership offer is a long-term development model. Nonetheless, the EU is likely to be influential in its neighbourhood in the long term only if it is able to constantly adjust to its environment and address short-term challenges in a timely manner. Current developments in the Eastern neighbourhood, either domestically or as a result of Russia s policies, require an immediate response. However, too often the EU sticks to its long-term approach without being able to adjust its policies when developments in the field require either prompt or firm reactions. Ukraine is a case in point. Under the Yanukovych presidency, even though it became increasingly harsh, the EU only belatedly resorted to conditionality in response to the growing authoritarian trends. It was also at a very late stage (second half of February 2014) that it decided to introduce sanctions against the former Ukrainian authorities, while the police had been making an excessive use of force since the Euromaidan started at the end of November This weakened both the EU s leverage over the country s authorities and its credibility among protesters. Presently, the EU s long-term policies towards the neighbourhood and the EU s short-term crisis management and common security and defence policy (CSDP) remain separate and in need of better integration. 20 Clearly, the specific features of EU foreign policy (e.g. its multilateral character) make it more difficult to respond quickly to unanticipated events. Nevertheless, under the ENP, and especially the Eastern Partnership, the EU has both intensified the level of dialogue with Eastern partner governments and introduced new formats of cooperation and dialogue with a wide range of non-governmental actors in partner countries. Without doubt, the EU is now in a better position to monitor developments closely in the field. However, it needs to incorporate the outcomes of such monitoring more effectively and promptly in its policy approach. Conclusions Following the recent crisis in the EU-Russia common neighbourhood, the picture that emerges is one of confrontation, leading to a parting of the ways between the EU and Russia. Firstly, today s Russia and the EU have little in common, while ten years ago their partnership was launched on the premise that the EU s and Russia s common values and shared interests would develop along the same lines. Secondly, both Russia and the EU are increasingly turning to other partners. As a consequence the EU-Russian strategic partnership is bereft of substance, which is likely to remain unchanged for years to come. While the estrangement between the EU and Russia is apparent, an outright split would be much more problematic because of the close interdependence of the two partners. 20 S. Blockmans (2014), Priorities for the Next Legislature: EU external action, CEPS Commentary, Brussels, September.
10 10 DELCOUR & KOSTANYAN Divisions between the EU and Russia have been mirrored by deepening fault lines in their common neighbourhood. Three Eastern Partnership countries signed the Association Agreements including DCFTAs (Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia); others are part of (Belarus) or are planning to join (Armenia) the Eurasian integration project, and a partner (Azerbaijan) shows no interest in either of the integration formats. While this suggests a clear-cut division between those countries favouring deep economic integration with the EU and those remaining inside the Russian hub, the picture in the region is actually much more complex. As a result of Russia s attempts to undermine progress towards further integration with the EU and NATO, in some cases dividing lines pass through partner countries such as Georgia (with South Ossetia and Abkhazia), Moldova (with Transnistria) and Ukraine (with Crimea). Moreover, the lines dividing the neighbourhood are by no means immutable. They are likely to fluctuate as a result of the simultaneous deployment of two competing offers which, to a large extent, are still in the making. Thus, new lines may appear in the future, such as through Gagauzia and eastern/southern Ukraine. In addition, the continuity and solidity of partner countries commitments in either the Eurasian integration or the EU integration process is yet to be ascertained, given the highly volatile domestic and regional environment. There are serious questions about the ability and/or willingness of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia to implement the commitments they have undertaken through signing the Association Agreements and the DCFTAs with the EU. The reluctant participation of Armenia in the Eurasian project, and Belarus and Kazakhstan s opposition to including political aspects in the Eurasian integration are not to be underestimated either. The EU and Russia will remain key powers in all the countries of the increasingly fragmented neighbourhood, yet the extent of their influence and the way in which they exert it will vary considerably across countries. On the one hand, the Kremlin s perception of the AAs and the DCFTAs as tools preparing the ground for the countries of the post-soviet space to join the EU and NATO is likely to continue to drive its policies in the region. On the other hand, in the EU s view the countries included in the Eastern Partnership are sovereign states that are entitled to negotiate and sign agreements with any international actor without the intervention of third countries. For Russia, however, these are merely abstract concepts and it has shown a great willingness to counter what it sees as the Westernisation of its neighbours. In the current volatile climate, the EU needs a strategy towards Russia that goes beyond sanctions. In reviewing the European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership, the EU s incoming leadership should be more sensitive towards the existing political, diplomatic, economic, energy and military ties between Russia and the countries in the common neighbourhood. After all, it is by exploiting these ties that Russia was able to turn the common neighbourhood into an area of destructive competition the primary victim of which is Ukraine. Understanding Russia s perceptions and being sensitive to these longstanding ties does not mean justifying their use by the Kremlin. Nevertheless, factoring these ties into the EU s policies vis-à-vis its Eastern neighbourhood is a prerequisite for more reflective, responsive and effective EU policies.
The Foreign Policy of Ukraine One Year After the Orange Revolution PONARS Policy Memo No. 372 Volodymyr Dubovyk Odessa National University December 2005 It has been a year since the Orange Revolution in
DEEP AND COMPREHENSIVE FREE TRADE AREA EU-MOLDOVA I. What is the DCFTA? Argumentaire The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) is an arrangement between the EU and the Republic of Moldova that
European Council Brussels, 20 March 2015 (OR. en) EUCO 11/15 CO EUR 1 CONCL 1 COVER NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Delegations Subject: European Council meeting (19 and 20 March 2015)
EU Global Strategy: Role and Engagement of Eastern Partners in European Security Conference Report March 2016 Vilnius, Lithuania The International Security Experts Conference EU Global Strategy: Role and
Dr.Karoly Gruber (Szechenyi Istvan University of Gyor, Hungary): The European Union, Central Europe and Russia: Cooperation and/or containment? Perspectives on Political Transformation in Central and Eastern
Wider Europe Initiative Framework Programme for Finland s Development Policy Implementation Plan for 2009 2013 MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS June 2009 CONTENTS: Wider Europe Initiative 3 Priorities of the
INFORMAL BACKGROUND DOCUMENT The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and health General The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) was developed in 2004, with the objective of avoiding the emergence of new
St.-Petersburg, 31 May 2003 9937/03 (Presse 154) EU-RUSSIA SUMMIT (St.-Petersburg, 31 May 2003) JOINT STATEMT 300 th anniversary of St.-Petersburg celebrating three centuries of common European history
RUSSIA CHINA NEXUS IN CYBER SPACE E. Dilipraj Associate Fellow, CAPS On May 08, 2015 Russia and China inked an important agreement in the field of cyber security. This bilateral agreement is the latest
17th EU-Ukraine Summit: Joint Statement 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The 17 th EU-Ukraine Summit took place in Kyiv on 27 April 2015. The European Union was represented by President of the European Council Donald Tusk
Erich Reiter and Johann Frank The European Security Strategy Austrian Perspective The following essay gives the Austrian view on the ESS from a security political perspective and analyses the needs and
Russian National Security Policy in 2000 Celeste A. January 2000 PONARS Policy Memo 102 Harvard University Although signing a decree granting the new National Security Concept the status of law in January
LEGAL AND ILLEGAL MONEY TRANSFERS AS RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY INSTRUMENTS FATIH OZBAY SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER ON FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY, HASEN FATIH OZBAY 128 Migrants who are mostly coming from former
CARIM East Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration Co-financed by the European Union Policy on Migration and Diasporas in Georgia Natia Chelidze CARIM-East Explanatory Note 12/33 Socio-Political
NEGOTIATING FRAMEWORK FOR TURKEY Principles governing the negotiations 1. The negotiations will be based on Turkey's own merits and the pace will depend on Turkey's progress in meeting the requirements
Russia s Eurasian Integration Policies Timofei V. Bordachev, Andrei S. Skriba The Eurasian economic integration regime is a new attempt by Russia and other countries of the region to create a new association,
U.S. POLICY IN THE BLACK SEA REGION From the U.S. point of view, NATO is and will remain the premier provider of security for the Euro-Atlantic region, which includes the Black Sea. Far from seeking to
Home Security: Russia s Challenges A Russian Perspective Andrei Fedorov * Home security: Russia s challenges Home security and the struggle against terrorism is one of the most crucial issues for the Russian
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, COM(2008) 823/4 EASTERN EUROPE and CENTRAL ASIA Meeting doc. 338/08 Origin: Commission Date: 03.12.2008 COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE
Working Paper 5 The Luxembourg Process Five Years On Bernhard Jansen I am very pleased and honoured to have been given the opportunity to write about the subject The Luxembourg Process Five Years On. Rather
12 Globalization and International Trade Globalization refers to the growing interdependence of countries resulting from the increasing integration of trade, finance, people, and ideas in one global marketplace.
Hans Martin Sieg * THE EU S ROLE OR ABSENCE IN FROZEN CONFLICTS IN TRANSNISTRIA AND CAUCASUS In a joint communication by the High Representative (HR) and the Commission in May 2011 the EU announced its
Iris Kempe, Hanna Smith A Decade of Partnership and Cooperation in Russia-EU relations Perceptions, Perspectives and Progress - Possibilities for the Next Decade This paper was produced as the strategy
Framework Australia s Aid Program to Papua New Guinea 21 October 2002 Our Unique Development Partnership our close bilateral ties are reflected in our aid program Enduring ties bind Papua New Guinea with
Sebastian Schäffer, M.A. Presentation résumé for the conference The European Neighbourhood Policy: Aims and Impact Panel: EU/Russia relations and the ENP The EU-Russia relations and the Eastern Partnership
Negotiating a Deep Regional Trade Agreement Simulation Exercise prepared for CUTS training seminar 21-27 October, 2007 Common Facts Northistan and Southistan should be negotiating a free trade agreement,
1 East African Community STATEMENT BY AMB. DR. RICHARD SEZIBERA, SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY AT THE OFFICIAL OPENING CEREMONY OF THE 6 TH EAC MILITARY GAMES AND CULTURAL EVENTS ON 7
Energy Security: Role of Regional Cooperation Traian Chebeleu Today s Conference is dedicated to a topic that has deeply preoccupied the governments and the business communities in the Emerging Europe,
Eurocentrum Praha 4 th October 2007 Portuguese Presidency of the European Union A stronger Europe for a better world A stronger Europe for a better world is the motto of the current Portuguese Presidency.
Doc. GA26/CC25/REP/05 THE TWENTY FIFTH MEETING OF CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT* ON CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF EU ENLARGEMENT: CONSEQUENCES FOR THE BLACK SEA
Brussels, 12 June 2014 Opinion.05 CEEP OPINION ON THE TRANSATLANTIC TRADE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (TTIP) Executive Summary Focus 1: The respect of the EU Treaty Principle and EU political balance on
Chapter 10: The Globalization of Trade and Finance MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. The vicious cycle common to financial panics in Thailand was a result of a. investors deciding to hold off from selling and waiting
Annotated Agenda of the Sherpa meeting 21-11-2013 Main features of Contractual Arrangements and Associated Solidarity Mechanisms At their meeting on 26 November the Sherpas are invited to discuss: General
Food & Farming Focus on Market Safety Nets December 215 Agriculture and Rural Development 1 AGRICULTURAL MARKETS AS A DRIVER FOR EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE The agricultural markets and their prices have evolved
Using More for More: Incentivising Peace in the EU s Neighbourhood Policy Prevention of conflict is one of the key objectives of EU external action as set out in the Lisbon Treaty and as repeatedly stated
Opening statement by Frans Timmermans, First Vice-President designate, in charge of Better Regulation, Inter-Institutional Relations, the Rule of Law and the Charter of Fundamental Rights 7 October 2014
Final Report High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth February 11, 2013 INTRODUCTION As the United States-European Union High Level Working Group on Jobs and Growth (HLWG) noted in its June 19, 2012
The Decree of the President of Ukraine, #622/2011 On the Concept of State Migration Policy With a purpose of creation of proper conditions for realization of state policy in the sphere of migration I hereby
Defense and Intelligence The Meaning of Russia s Campaign in Syria By S.R. Covington Foreword by Kevin Ryan December 2015 Defense and Intelligence The Meaning of Russia s Campaign in Syria By S.R. Covington
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS File No.: 46.H.5.NIRAS.2013-15. Department for Stabilization and Security Policy External Grant Committee Meeting 8 April 2014 Agenda Item No.: 3 1. Title: Peace and Stabilisation
12 Is China Catching Up with the US? Kenneth Lieberthal Opinion Kenneth Lieberthal Is China Catching Up with the US? While China has emerged as a key player in global affairs, significant challenges to
The EU and the Global Convergence in Accounting Standards Since 2000, Europe has led a global movement towards the creation of a single set of accounting standards for companies whose shares are listed
ALDE BLUEPRINT FOR A NEW EUROPEAN AGENDA ON MIGRATION In recent years there have been regular reminders that the EU asylum and migration system is not fit for purpose and needs a fundamental rethink. The
UNDERSTANDING NATO THE ORIGINS OF THE ALLIANCE In the aftermath of the Second World War, East and West Europe found themselves separated by the ideological and political divisions of the Cold War. Eastern
To what extent were the policies of the United States responsible for the outbreak and development of the Cold War between 1945 and 1949? Although the dominant military confrontations of the 20 th century
Explaining Russia s New Normal Chris Weafer of Macro-Advisory This Op- Ed appeared on BNE.eu on September 11 2015 One of the slogans now regularly deployed to describe Russia s current economic condition
MINISTERE DE L ALIMENTATION, DE L AGRICULTURE ET DE LA PECHE Franco German position for a strong Common Agricultural Policy beyond 2013 14.09.2010 - New challenges and expectations for food, biomass and
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.6.2011 COM(2011) 372 final AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET 2012 [STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURE BY SECTION Section III - Commission AMENDING LETTER No 1 TO THE
Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies www.wiiw.ac.at Russian Economic and Integration Prospects Peter Havlik The Vienna Institute
1 Principles of development cooperation between Estonia and Ukraine 2016 Foreword Ukraine has been a priority partner country for Estonia s bilateral development cooperation since 2006. Ukraine was also
Prime Ministers Council of the Baltic Council of Ministers Joint Statement The Prime Minister of Estonia Mr. Taavi Rõivas, the Prime Minister of Latvia Mrs. Laimdota Straujuma and the Prime Minister of
International Conference CALL FOR PAPERS THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WESTERN BALKANS BETWEEN LESSONS LEARNED AND INNOVATIVE WAYS FORWARD 17.06.2015 Bucharest, Romania On July 15 th 2014 Jean-Claude Juncker
Cyber Security Ultimately Is Military Security Reporter: ZUO Xiaoyu You Ji Professor of Macau University, School of Social Sciences. Research Area: national security. With deepening development of cyber
ISSUES PAPER ON COMPLETING THE ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION Introduction The European Council of 29 June 2012 concluded the following: "The report "Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union" presented
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA MISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS 350 EAST 35TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10016 Please Check Against Delivery Statement by H.E. Ambassador Li Baodong Head of the Chinese Delegation at
Expert Seminar Engagement with Non-State Armed Groups in Peace Processes Sept. 14 th and 15 th, 2010, Berlin Background: Non-state armed groups (NSAG) conflict regions. By exercising armed violence and
EDRi s Red lines on TTIP January 2015 European Digital Rights Rue Belliard 20, 1040 Brussels www.edri.org @EDRi tel. +32 (0) 2 274 25 70 ABOUT EDRI European Digital Rights is a network of 34 privacy and
INTRODUCTION This Declaration, prepared within the framework of the Belgian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, is addressed to the Member States of the Council of Europe,
ARTICLES PROBLEMS OF EUROPEAN SECURITY: POSITIONS OF THE POPULATION OF UKRAINE Mikhail PASHKOV, UCEPS leading expert The European continent is undergoing two processes which are important to Ukraine from
The Double Democratic Deficit Parliamentary Accountability and the Use of Force under International Auspices Hans Born, Senior Fellow, DCAF Geneva Brussels, 29 April 2004 Presentation given at the Book
Training Professionals in Trade Policy Development Advocacy and Negotiation - The Training Challenge in Commercial Diplomacy Geza Feketekuty The expansion of trade brought about by the reduction of trade
> > P O L I C Y B R I E F I S S N : 1 9 8 9-2 6 6 7 Nº 92 - AUGUST 2011 Moldova: an EU success story? Jos Boonstra >> Moldova has gone through two turbulent years and is now making some headway in democratic
DISCUSSION PAPER (16 JULY 2014) EU BATTLEGROUPS: USE THEM OR LOSE THEM SUBMITTED BY THE DELEGATION OF THE NETHERLANDS TO THE ITALIAN PRESIDENCY PARLIAMENT OF THE IPC CFSP/CSDP Introduction At the European
This policy brief analyses the EU s positioning at the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The EU does not have a delegation to international organisations in The Hague, but in
Civil Society Organizations From the Republic of Moldova: Development, Sustainability and Participation in Policy Dialogue CHAPTER I. EVOLUTION AND STRUCTURE OF CSOs IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Conceptualization
3 rd Africa Europe Youth Leaders Summit People, Prosperity and Peace 31 March to 1 April 2014 Summit Paper Introduction In 2014 half of the world s population are under 25 years old. In order to give young
1 Declaration on the 20th Anniversary of the Barents Euro-Arctic Cooperation (Kirkenes, Norway, 3 4 June 2013) Prime Ministers and other high-level representatives of the members of the Barents Euro- Arctic
From: Supporting Statebuilding in Situations of Conflict and Fragility Policy Guidance Access the complete publication at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264074989-en Choosing tools for analysis and monitoring
THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IT IS HIGH TIME TO START A REAL PARTNERSHIP Paweł Dariusz Wiśniewski NOVEMBER 2013 THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP IT IS HIGH TIME TO START A REAL PARTNERSHIP Paweł Dariusz Wiśniewski 2013
Regional Strategy for Sweden s Development Cooperation with the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) 2016 2020 MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SWEDEN UTRIKESDEPARTEMENTET MFA 103 39 Stockholm Telephone: +46
9. Major powers and arms control: a Chinese perspective Li Changhe I. Introduction The major powers play a key role in the process of international arms control and disarmament. Their policies and actions
The euro: a new currency for Europe Dinner speech delivered by W. F. Duisenberg, President of the European Central Bank at the Bank of Thailand on 19 December 2000 Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests.
HOW CAN THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM STRENGTHEN ITS ADVOCACY FUNCTION? NATALIA SHAPOVALOVA Associate researcher at FRIDE Paper commissioned by the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum
Sweden s Regional Strategy for the Syria Crisis 2016 2020 MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SWEDEN UTRIKESDEPARTEMENTET MFA 103 39 Stockholm Telephone: +46 8 405 10 00, Web site: www.ud.se Cover: Editorial
MINISTRY FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, SWEDEN UTRIKESDEPARTEMENTET Strategy for Sweden s development cooperation with Rwanda 2015 2019 MFA 103 39 Stockholm Telephone: +46 8 405 10 00, Web site: www.ud.se Cover:
CHAPTER 15. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 15. 1. Introduction The main question addressed in this PhD thesis is whether the restrictions placed by Dutch law on deducting interest for corporate income tax purposes
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 December 2008 16651/1/08 REV 1 AELE 17 EEE 50 N 48 CH 71 ISL 36 FL 43 "I/A" ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Coreper/Council Subject: Draft
The Honorable Michael Froman Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economic Affairs The White House Washington, DC 20504 USA Ambassador Ron Kirk U.S. Trade Representative
Piotr Switalski The OSCE Chairmanship: Development of an Institution 1 Political Executive as the OSCE's Distinctive Feature The institution of the Chairmanship constitutes a central element of the OSCE's
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.