Adaptive Control for Robot Manipulators Under Ellipsoidal Task Space Constraints


 Ralf Sims
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 22 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems October 72, 22. Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal Adaptive Control for Robot Manipulators Under Ellipsoidal Task Space Constraints Keng Peng Tee, Shuzhi Sam Ge, Rui Yan, and Haizhou Li Abstract Motivated by applications in robotassisted physical rehabilitation, this paper presents an adaptive control design for robot manipulators operating in an ellipsoidal constrained region. The ellipsoidal constraint problem is more challenging than the box constraint problem tackled in previous works, since the nonlinear constraint boundary cannot be handled in a decoupled manner along the dimensions of the task space. We introduce a novel Barrier Lyapunov Function (BLF) which contains a quotient of the squared norm of the tracking error over the ellipsoidal task space constraint. This function allows the task space constraint to be handled directly without requiring an intermediate mapping to the error space. We show that, under the proposed BLFbased adaptive control, the endeffector always remains in the constrained region despite the perturbing effects of online parameter adaptation and also the presence of bounded external disturbances. A simulation example illustrates the performance of the proposed control. Fig.. robot constrained task space Ellipsoidal constrained region for robot endeffector. I. INTRODUCTION Robotics applications are moving from factory floors to unstructured human environments. As such, research on the safe control of robot manipulators, in close proximity or direct physical interactions with human users, is gaining importance. In particular, the topic of adaptive interaction control, which aims to reduce dependency on a precise knowledge of the dynamics of the robot and the environment, has seen substantial advancement through works such as adaptive impedance control [], [2], [3], adaptive admittance control [4], adaptive Jacobian tracking [5], and approximationbased impedance control [6], [7]. While adaptive interaction control has received much attention, position constraints in the operating environment are usually neglected in the control design. During physical interactions with humans, the interactive forces can be unpredictable. Therefore, constraints need to be enforced to prevent endangerment to human safety as well as collisions with itself or the surroundings. Consider the example of robotassisted physical rehabilitation [8] for patients who suffer from motor disabilities (Figure ). The motion of the rehabilitation robot needs to be constrained strictly within a subset of the task space to minimize the risk of overstretching and injuring the patient s limb. Depending on the extent of muscle spasticity, abnormal muscle tone, and other conditions, a patient s limb can The corresponding author is K.P. Tee, K.P. Tee, R. Yan, and H. Li are with the Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR, Singapore S. S. Ge is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 7576, and also with the The Robotics Institute, and School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 683, China. exhibit varying movement resistance in different regions and along different directions in the task space. Thus, the motor rehabilitation program needs to customize the constrained region, in terms of size, shape or orientation, according to patient s motor condition and progressive outcome. Given the constrained region, the robot controller needs to guarantee that the endeffector, which is the point of interaction, always stays inside. Furthermore, the controller is required to adaptively compensate for uncertainty in the combined inertia of the coupled system between the patient s limb and the robot manipulator. Based on the practical scenario described above, we see a need for a rigorous guarantee of constrained region satisfaction in adaptive interaction control. Such a constrainedregion control problem, which is concerned with keeping the manipulator inside a region described by inequality constraints, is different from existing works that deal with keeping the manipulator on a surface represented by equality constraints [5]. A promising approach to ensure constrained region satisfaction is to employ Barrier Lyapunov Functions (BLF) when designing the control [9], [], []. The method uses barrier functions that grow to infinity at some finite limits, and designs a control to keep the candidate BLF bounded in the closed loop system, thus guaranteeing that the barriers are not transgressed. Our previous work on BLFbased control of robot manipulator in constrained task space [2] focused on box constraints of a fixed orientation, and was unable to handle more general shapes of constrained regions, such as ellipsoids, in arbitrary orientations. In this paper, we propose a new method of adaptive constrained control design for robot manipulators, based on a novel barrier function that is a quotient of the squared /2/S3. 22 IEEE 67
2 norm of the tracking error over the task space constraint. This function is different from the logarithmic type barrier function of [2], which was formulated in terms of the tracking error only, and necessitated a mapping of the task space constraint to a dynamic error space constraint. Another difference is that [2] only handles box constraints, while the BLF proposed here allows the handling of more general constraints such as ellipsoids. Compared with box constraints, ellipsoidal constraints are harder to deal with, since the constraint boundary is a nonlinear curve or surface in task space, and cannot be handled in a decoupled manner along each dimension of the task space as in the case of box constraints. Our new barrier function simplifies the control design and enables the direct handling of ellipsoidal task space constraints without prior mapping to the error space, which can be a complicated process and can lead to a conservative design. Under a unified framework of BLFbased Lyapunov control synthesis and stability analysis, we show that the endeffector is able to track a desired trajectory while never leaving the ellipsoidal constrained region. II. PROBLEM FORMULATION Throughout this paper, we denote by R the set of real numbers, and the Euclidean vector norm in R m. A. Robot Dynamics Consider a robot manipulator described by: M(q) q + C(q, q) q + G(q) + F( q) = τ + τ e (t) () where M(q) R n n is a symmetric positive definite matrix, C(q, q) q R n the Coriolis and centrifugal forces, G(q) R n the gravitational forces, F( q) R n the frictional forces, q R n the robot joint position, τ R n the input torque, and τ e R n a bounded interaction torque from the environment (or human) satisfying τ e (t) τ e, t, with τ e a constant. The terms M(q), C(q, q), F( q) and G(q) contain uncertain dynamic parameters. To track a desired trajectory in task space, the joint space dynamics () are transformed into task space dynamics [3]: M x ẍ + C x ẋ + G x + F x = f + f e (t) (2) via the forward kinematics and the Jacobian: x = Ω(q), ẋ = Ω q =: J(q) q (3) q where x = [x,,...,x m ] T is a vector of task variables, and the coefficient matrices are defined as M x = J T MJ, G x = J T G, F x = J T F C x = J T (C MJ J)J, f = J T τ, f e = J T τ e (4) Note that the external force f e is bounded by a constant f e, i.e. f e (t) f e, t. For simplicity, we consider only nonredundant (m = n) nonsingular manipulators with known Jacobian J in this paper. Henceforth, we consider x R n. Furthermore, we consider only positioning of the endeffector (i.e. n 3), although our method can be easily modified to control endeffector orientation too. The following properties hold [3]. Property : The inertia matrix M x is symmetric positive definite. Property 2: The matrix Ṁx 2C x is skew symmetric. Property 3: The lefthandside expression of (2) can be linearly parameterized in terms of the robot system parameters as follows: M x φ + C x φ 2 + G x + F x = ψ(φ,φ 2,x,ẋ)θ (5) for any φ,φ 2 R m, where θ R l are constant parameters and ψ R l is a known regressor function. B. Control Objective The control objective is to ensure that the endeffector position x = [x,...,x n ] T tracks a desired trajectory x d = [x d,...,x dn ] T while always satisfying position constraints imposed on the endeffector. Specifically, the endeffector is required to satisfy position constraints, which involve always staying in the interior of an ellipsoidal region x T Sx =, where S is a positive definite symmetric matrix. Thus, the position constraint set can be described by x Ω x, where Ω x = {x R n : x T Sx < } (6) In other words, the controller needs to ensure that x(t) Ω x t >, given that x() Ω x. Assumption : The desired trajectory x d (t) Ω x t, and there exist positive constants Y and Y 2 such that ẋ d (t) Y and ẍ d (t) Y 2, t. III. CONTROL SYNTHESIS USING A BARRIER LYAPUNOV FUNCTION Denote the error variables as: z = [z,...,z n ] T = x x d w = [w,...,w n ] T = ẋ α (7) where α = [α,...,α n ] T is a stabilizing function to be designed shortly. Then, we define the following constraint functions: (x) = x T Sx (8) For system (2), consider the Barrier Lyapunov Function (BLF) candidate V (z,x,w,q, θ) = V z (z,x) + V w (w,q) + V θ ( θ) (9) z T z V z (z,x) = () 2 (x) V w (w,q) = 2 wt M x w () V θ ( θ) = 2 θ T Γ θ (2) where σ = [σ,...,σ n ] T, Γ is a positive definite matrix, θ = ˆθ θ is the error between θ and its estimate ˆθ, and () is 68
3 a quotient of mixed variables z and x. It can be shown that V is positive definite and continuously differentiable in the set x Ω x. We employ adaptive backstepping procedure [4] to design the controller. For the robot manipulator (), the procedure consists of 2 steps. Step First, we design the stabilizing function. To this end, we obtain the partial derivatives of V z (z,x) as follows: V z (z,x) z V z (z,x) = z T (x) = zt z 2g 2 s(x) (x) Thus, the timederivative of V z in () is given by V z = where = z T zt z 2g 2 s(x) (3) (x) (w + α) (x) (w + α ẋ d) z T (x) [h(z,x)(w + α) ẋ d] (4) h(z, x) = ( (x) = xt Sx d x T Sx ) z 2 (x) We design the stabilizing function α as follows: α(z,x,ẋ d ) = (5) h(z,x) ( K zz + ẋ d ) (6) where K z is a positive definite matrix. By substituting (6) into (4), we obtain: V z = zt K z z + h(z,x)zt w (7) The following lemma shows that h(z,x) is bounded away from in the set x,x d Ω x, which is important for ensuring that α(z,x,ẋ d ) is bounded for x,x d Ω x and bounded ẋ d. Lemma : The term h(z, x), defined in (5), satisfies h(z,x) > in the set x,x d Ω x. Proof: By completion of squares, we obtain the inequality: 2x T Sx d x T Sx + x T d Sx d (8) Furthermore, in the set x,x d Ω x, we have x T Sx < and x T d Sx d <. Then, it is clear, from (8), that x T Sx d < (9) Finally, from (5), it follows that h(z,x) > in the set x,x d Ω x. Step 2 In this step, we design the adaptive control torque and the adaptation law. Similar to Step, we obtain the timederivative of V w from (2) and () as: V w = w T ( C x ẋ G x F x + f + f e M x α) + 2 wt Ṁw (2) Substituting ẋ = w + α and using Property 2, we eliminate the last term on the right hand side and obtain V w = w T ( C x α G x F x + f + f e M x α) (2) Then, based on Property 3, we can rewrite V w such that the robot dynamics are linearly parameterized: V w = w T ( ψ( α,α,x,ẋ)θ + f + f e ) (22) where ψ is a known regressor. Then, we obtain the timederivative of the Lyapunov function candidate (9) as V = zt K z z + w T ( ψ( α,α,x,ẋ)θ + f + f e ) + θ T Γ ˆθ (23) Now, we design the control as f = ψ( α,α,x,ẋ)ˆθ K w w h(z,x)z (24) τ = J T (q)f (25) where K w > I/2 is a positive definite matrix. For robust adaptation of the parameter estimate ˆθ, we employ the following adaptation law: ˆθ = Γ( ψ( α,α,x,ẋ)w µˆθ) (26) where µ is a positive constant. The leakage term provides robustness against unmodelled disturbances and noisy force measurements. Substituting (24) and (26) into (23), it can be shown that V zt K z z w T (K w 2 I)w + 2 f 2 e µ 2 θ 2 + µ 2 θ 2 ρv + c (27) in the set x Ω x, where ρ = { min 2λ min (K z ), 2λ min(k w 2 I) } µ, λ max (M x ) λ max (Γ ) (28) c = 2 f 2 e µ 2 θ 2 + µ 2 θ 2 (29) The closed loop error system is given by: ż = h(z,x) ( K zz + ẋ d ) + w ẋ d ( ẇ = Mx ψ( α,α,x,ẋ) θ K w w h(z,x)z ) θ = Γ( ψ( α,α,x,ẋ)w µ( θ + θ)) (3) which can be rewritten in the form ξ = h(t,ξ) (3) where ξ = [z,w, θ] T, h(t,ξ) is piecewise continuous in t and locally Lipschitz in ξ, uniformly in t, in the set ξ Ψ = {ξ R 2n+l : > } (32) 69
4 Thus, (27) and (3) allow us to establish the existence and uniqueness of the solution ξ(t) t [, ), according to [5]. In the following result, we establish the fact that x(t) remains in the constrained set Ω x t >, as well as the convergence properties of z(t). Theorem : Consider the robot manipulator () under Assumption, control torque (25), and parameter adaptation law (26). For initial condition x() Ω x, the following properties hold: i) The tracking error z(t) is bounded by: ( z(t) 2 V t= + c ), t > (33) ρ ii) The state x(t) remains, for all t >, in the constrained set Ω x. iii) The stabilizing function α(t) and control torque τ(t) are bounded t >. Proof: i) From (27), we obtain that V t V t= + c/ρ in the set x Ω x. Since initial condition x() Ω x, we have V t V t= + c/ρ t >. Then, using the fact that V t z(t) 2 /2, we thus arrive at z(t) 2 2(V t= + c/ρ), which leads to (33). ii) Using proof by contradiction, we first assume that there exists some t = T such that x(t) T Sx(T) = (34) starting from the initial condition x() Ω x. Then, using (), we rewrite the result V t=t V t= + c/ρ t > as z(t) 2 (x(t)) V t= + c ρ (35) Now, substituting (34), the left hand side becomes infinite, contradicting the boundedness result V t=t V t= + c/ρ t >. As such, x(t) T Sx(t) (36) for all t >. Then, since x() Ω x, it is clear that x(t) Ω x t >. iii) Since V t V t= + c/ρ, we know that ˆθ(t) and w(t) are bounded t >. Based on Lemma, we know that h(z,x) > for all x,x d Ω x. Thus, we see, from (6), that the stabilizing function α(t) is bounded too. This leads to the boundedness of ẋ(t), since ẋ = w + α. We can also show that α is bounded by noting the boundedness of the partial derivatives of α(z,x,ẋ d ) in the set x Ω x. Since f is a continuous function of bounded signals in the set x Ω x, we know that f(t) is bounded t >. Since the Jacobian J is nonsingular in the constrained work space, τ(t) = J T f(t) is bounded t >. Corollary : Consider the robot manipulator () in the special case of f e. Then the control law (6), (24) (25), and adaptation law ˆθ = Γψ T v, with initial condition x() Ω x, ensure that the tracking error z(t) converges to zero asymptotically, i.e., x(t) x d (t) as t. Proof: Substituting (24), f e, and ˆθ = Γψ T v into (23) yields V = zt K z z =: (z,x) (37) (z,x) Since V, we can show that (z(t),x(t)) > t >, using a similar approach as the proof of Theorem (ii). t Thus, it can be shown that lim t (τ) dτ and (t) are bounded. Then, we invoke Barbalat s Lemma [6] to show that (z(t),x(t)) as t. Since (z,x) = only if z =, we conclude that z(t) as t. IV. SIMULATION To illustrate the performance of the proposed controller, we consider a simple example of a twolink frictionless robot moving in a horizontal plane subject to a ellipsoidal constraint in the task space. All units are S.I. The robot dynamics are modeled by [7] τ = m 2 l 2 2( q + q 2 ) + m 2 l l 2 c 2 (2 q + q 2 ) τ e +(m + m 2 )l 2 q m 2 l l 2 s 2 q 2 2 2m 2 l l 2 s 2 q q 2 τ 2 = m 2 l2( q 2 + q 2 ) + m 2 l l 2 c 2 q + m 2 l l 2 s 2 q 2 τ e2 (38) where c i = cos(q i ), s i = sin(q i ), s ij = sin(q i + q j ), and c ij = cos(q i + q j ). The uncertain parameters are m and m 2, whose true values are.5kg and.kg respectively. The lengths of the links are l = l 2 =.35m. The ellipsoidal constraint region is described by x T Sx = where S =.224, S 2 = S 2 = , and S = This ellipse has major length.35m, minor length.25m, and is rotated anticlockwise by 3deg. The origin of the task space x = [x, ] T is at [,.32] T m with respect to the position of the base joint. Initially, the endeffector is at rest at the origin. We apply the proposed BLFbased adaptive controller (24)(26), with design parameters K z =.5I, K w = 8I, Γ = 5I, and µ = 4. The parameter estimates are initialized as ˆθ () = ˆθ () =.75. To test the ability of the controller to maintain the endeffector within the constrained region in the presence of disturbances, we apply, on the endeffector, an interaction force (in N) that is proportional to the desired setpoint/trajectory: f e (t) = kx d (t) (39) where k is a positive constant. These are indicated by the arrows emanating from the center in Figure 2. Then, the interaction torque τ e = [τ e,τ e2 ] T is given by τ e = J T f e. For comparison purpose, we also simulate a conventional adaptive controller without BLFbased constraint satisfaction, described by: α = K z z + ẏ d f = K w w + ψˆθ z ˆθ = Γ( ψw µˆθ) (4) 7
5 A. Setpoint Reaching The setpoint reaching task requires that the robot endeffector, starting from the center of the elliptic constrained region, reach a set of 8 target points near the boundary. The interaction force (39) is set with k = 2.5Nm. z with BLF z time [s] Fig. 3. Trajectories of the endeffector under BLFbased control for the setpoint reaching task. N x without BLF.3.2 parameter estimate ˆθ ˆθ x Fig. 2. Traversed paths of the endeffector with (top) and without (bottom) BLFbased control for the setpoint reaching task. The grey ellipse represents the boundary of the constrained region. Figure 2 shows that the proposed BLFbased adaptive controller succeeds in preventing the endeffector from transgressing the boundary of the ellipse, despite the fact that the target points are very close to the boundary and a constant outward force is trying to pushing the endeffector out of the constrained region. Online parameter adaptation contribute an additional source of transient perturbation, but the proposed control is able to ensure that the targets are reached accurately without ever leaving the constrained region. By examining Figure 3, it is clear that the BLFbased control provides good error convergence properties. The parameter estimates ˆθ and ˆθ 2,, as well as the control torque τ, are always bounded and converge quickly to steady values, as shown in Figure 4. However, for the conventional adaptive controller without BLFbased constraint satisfaction, the endeffector escapes the constrained region and is unable to converge to any of the target points due to the bias force disturbance, as shown in Figure 2. N control torque [Nm] time [s] Fig. 4. Evolution of parameter estimates (top) and control torques (bottom) for a representative movement in the setpoint reaching task. B. Trajectory Tracking The trajectory tracking task requires the endeffector to track a desired trajectory lying on an ellipse within the constrained region. The trajectory is described by: x d (t) = Acos ( π 4 + ωt ), x d2 (t) = A 2 sin( π 4 + ωt) (4) The interaction force (39) is set with k =.Nm. As observed in Figure 5, the endeffector starts from the origin and tracks the desired trajectory in the presence of model uncertainty and interaction force (39), progressively reducing its tracking error with the help of the adaptive controller. With our proposed BLFbased constraint satisfaction mechanism, the endeffector never leaves the constrained region despite the fact that the desired trajectory almost touches the boundary of the constrained region at some points. In contrast, the traversed path corresponding to the conventional adaptive controller (4) transgresses the boundary of the constrained region substantially. Figure 6 shows that the endeffector trajectory under our proposed BLFbased control eventually converges to the desired trajectory. τ τ 2 7
6 with BLF x without BLF x Fig. 5. Traversed paths of the endeffector with (top) and without (bottom) BLFbased control for the trajectory tracking task. The grey ellipse represents the boundary of the constrained region. x time [s] Fig. 6. After parameter adaptation, the endeffector trajectory (solid) under BLFbased control tracks the desired trajectory (dotted) closely. V. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we have presented the design of an adaptive controller for nonredundant robot manipulators operating in a virtually constrained task space. Specifically, we deal with the class of ellipsoidal constrained regions, which constitute a more difficult problem compared with rectangular constrained regions that have been handled in previous works. We have used a barrier function that explicitly contains the ellipsoidal task space constraint. This has allowed the simultaneous satisfaction of tracking and constraint requirements without the need to, first, map the ellipsoidal constraint from the task space to the error space. This mapping process, though successfully applied for the box constraint problem in [2], cannot be easily extended to the ellipsoidal constraint problem, because the nonlinear ellipsoidal surface cannot be treated in a decoupled manner along each dimension of the task space, as had been done in [2]. Hence, the barrier function proposed in this paper provides a relatively simple way to circumvent the difficulties associated with the existing approach. Using Lyapunovbased control synthesis and stability analysis, we have proven theoretically that the tracking error and control signals are bounded, and that the ellipsoidal task space constraints are always met. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work is supported by the A*STAR Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC) Grant No REFERENCES [] R. Kelly, R. Carelli, M. Amestegui, and R. Ortega, On adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics & Automation, (Scottsdale,Arizona), pp , 989. [2] R. Colbaugh, H. Seraji, and K. Glass, Direct adaptive impedance control for robot manipulators, J. Robotic Systems, vol., no. 2, pp , 993. [3] H. Park and J. Lee, Adaptive impedance control of a haptic interface, Mechatronics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp , 24. [4] H. Seraji, Adaptive admittance control: an approach to explicit force control in compliant motion, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics & Automation, (San Diego, CA), pp , 994. [5] C. C. Cheah, Y. Zhao, and J. J. E. Slotine, Adaptive Jacobian motion and force tracking control for constrained robots with uncertainties, in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, (Orlando, Florida), pp , May 26. [6] L. Huang, S. S. Ge, and T. H. Lee, Neural network based adaptive impedance control of constrained robots, in Proc. IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Control, pp , 22. [7] M. C. Chien and A. C. Huang, Adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators based on function approximation technique, Robotica, vol. 22, no. 4, 24. [8] H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M. L. Aisen, and B. T. Volpe, Robotaided neurorehabilitation., IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng, vol. 6, no., pp , 998. [9] K. P. Tee, S. S. Ge, and E. H. Tay, Adaptive control of electrostatic microactuators with bidirectional drive, IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp , 29. [] K. P. Tee, S. S. Ge, and E. H. Tay, Barrier Lyapunov functions for the control of outputconstrained nonlinear systems, Automatica, vol. 45, no. 4, pp , 29. [] K. P. Tee, B. Ren, and S. S. Ge, Control of nonlinear systems with timevarying output constraints, Automatica, vol. 47, no., pp , 2. [2] K. P. Tee, R. Yan, and H. Li, Adaptive admittance control of a robot manipulator under task space constraint, in IEEE Conference on Robotics & Automation, pp , 2. [3] M. W. Spong and M. Vidyasagar, Robot Dynamics and Control. New York: Wiley, 989. [4] M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. V. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. New York: Wiley and Sons, 995. [5] E. D. Sontag, Mathematical Control Theory. Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems, Volume 6 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Second edition. New York: SpringerVerlag, 998. [6] J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control. Englewood Cliff, NJ: PrenticeHall, 99. [7] J. J. Craig, P. Hsu, and S. S. Sastry, Adaptive control of mechanical manipulators, in Proc. IEEE International Conf. Robotics & Automation, pp. 9 95,
Example 4.1 (nonlinear pendulum dynamics with friction) Figure 4.1: Pendulum. asin. k, a, and b. We study stability of the origin x
Lecture 4. LaSalle s Invariance Principle We begin with a motivating eample. Eample 4.1 (nonlinear pendulum dynamics with friction) Figure 4.1: Pendulum Dynamics of a pendulum with friction can be written
More informationResearch Article EndEffector Trajectory Tracking Control of Space Robot with L 2 Gain Performance
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 5, Article ID 7534, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/.55/5/7534 Research Article EndEffector Trajectory Tracking Control of Space Robot with L Gain Performance Haibo
More informationVéronique PERDEREAU ISIR UPMC 6 mars 2013
Véronique PERDEREAU ISIR UPMC mars 2013 Conventional methods applied to rehabilitation robotics Véronique Perdereau 2 Reference Robot force control by Bruno Siciliano & Luigi Villani Kluwer Academic Publishers
More informationDesignSimulationOptimization Package for a Generic 6DOF Manipulator with a Spherical Wrist
DesignSimulationOptimization Package for a Generic 6DOF Manipulator with a Spherical Wrist MHER GRIGORIAN, TAREK SOBH Department of Computer Science and Engineering, U. of Bridgeport, USA ABSTRACT Robot
More informationOperational Space Control for A Scara Robot
Operational Space Control for A Scara Robot Francisco Franco Obando D., Pablo Eduardo Caicedo R., Oscar Andrés Vivas A. Universidad del Cauca, {fobando, pacaicedo, avivas }@unicauca.edu.co Abstract This
More informationMotion Control of 3 DegreeofFreedom DirectDrive Robot. Rutchanee Gullayanon
Motion Control of 3 DegreeofFreedom DirectDrive Robot A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Rutchanee Gullayanon In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Engineering
More informationKinematics and Dynamics of Mechatronic Systems. Wojciech Lisowski. 1 An Introduction
Katedra Robotyki i Mechatroniki Akademia GórniczoHutnicza w Krakowie Kinematics and Dynamics of Mechatronic Systems Wojciech Lisowski 1 An Introduction KADOMS KRIM, WIMIR, AGH Kraków 1 The course contents:
More informationForce/position control of a robotic system for transcranial magnetic stimulation
Force/position control of a robotic system for transcranial magnetic stimulation W.N. Wan Zakaria School of Mechanical and System Engineering Newcastle University Abstract To develop a force control scheme
More informationLecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.243j (Fall 2003): DYNAMICS OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Lecture 7: Finding Lyapunov Functions 1
More informationACTUATOR DESIGN FOR ARC WELDING ROBOT
ACTUATOR DESIGN FOR ARC WELDING ROBOT 1 Anurag Verma, 2 M. M. Gor* 1 G.H Patel College of Engineering & Technology, V.V.Nagar388120, Gujarat, India 2 Parul Institute of Engineering & Technology, Limda391760,
More informationDynamics. Basilio Bona. DAUINPolitecnico di Torino. Basilio Bona (DAUINPolitecnico di Torino) Dynamics 2009 1 / 30
Dynamics Basilio Bona DAUINPolitecnico di Torino 2009 Basilio Bona (DAUINPolitecnico di Torino) Dynamics 2009 1 / 30 Dynamics  Introduction In order to determine the dynamics of a manipulator, it is
More informationCommunication on the Grassmann Manifold: A Geometric Approach to the Noncoherent MultipleAntenna Channel
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 48, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2002 359 Communication on the Grassmann Manifold: A Geometric Approach to the Noncoherent MultipleAntenna Channel Lizhong Zheng, Student
More informationA CooperatedRobot Arm Used for Rehabilitation Treatment with Hybrid Impedance Control Method
A CooperatedRobot Arm Used for Rehabilitation Treatment with Hybrid Impedance Control Method Jingguo Wang and Yangmin Li Department of Electromechanical Engineering, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More informationCONTROLLABILITY. Chapter 2. 2.1 Reachable Set and Controllability. Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation
Chapter 2 CONTROLLABILITY 2 Reachable Set and Controllability Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation ẋ Ax + Bu (2) x() x Consider the following problem For a given vector x in
More informationBy choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.
This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of Helsinki University of Technology's products or services Internal
More informationBilateral Teleoperation over the Internet: the Time Varying Delay Problem 1
Bilateral Teleoperation over the Internet: the Time Varying Delay Problem 1 Nikhil Chopra and Mark W. Spong Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign 14 S. Mathews Avenue
More informationThe dynamic equation for the angular motion of the wheel is R w F t R w F w ]/ J w
Chapter 4 Vehicle Dynamics 4.. Introduction In order to design a controller, a good representative model of the system is needed. A vehicle mathematical model, which is appropriate for both acceleration
More informationA Control Scheme for Industrial Robots Using Artificial Neural Networks
A Control Scheme for Industrial Robots Using Artificial Neural Networks M. Dinary, AbouHashema M. ElSayed, Abdel Badie Sharkawy, and G. Abouelmagd unknown dynamical plant is investigated. A layered neural
More informationLOOP TRANSFER RECOVERY FOR SAMPLEDDATA SYSTEMS 1
LOOP TRANSFER RECOVERY FOR SAMPLEDDATA SYSTEMS 1 Henrik Niemann Jakob Stoustrup Mike Lind Rank Bahram Shafai Dept. of Automation, Technical University of Denmark, Building 326, DK2800 Lyngby, Denmark
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN. E.V. Grigorieva. E.N. Khailov
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Supplement Volume 2005 pp. 345 354 OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A COMMERCIAL LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN E.V. Grigorieva Department of Mathematics
More information4 Lyapunov Stability Theory
4 Lyapunov Stability Theory In this section we review the tools of Lyapunov stability theory. These tools will be used in the next section to analyze the stability properties of a robot controller. We
More informationSolving Simultaneous Equations and Matrices
Solving Simultaneous Equations and Matrices The following represents a systematic investigation for the steps used to solve two simultaneous linear equations in two unknowns. The motivation for considering
More informationRobust Fault Diagnosis and Accommodation for a Robotic Manipulator under Human Interaction
Memorias del XVI Congreso Latinoamericano de Control Automático, CLCA 214 Octubre 1417, 214. Cancún, Quintana Roo, México Robust Fault Diagnosis and Accommodation for a Robotic Manipulator under Human
More informationIntelligent Mechatronic Model Reference Theory for Robot Endeffector
, pp.165172 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2015.8.1.15 Intelligent Mechatronic Model Reference Theory for Robot Endeffector Control Mohammad sadegh Dahideh, Mohammad Najafi, AliReza Zarei, Yaser
More informationAdaptive Friction Compensation for Servo Mechanisms
Adaptive Friction Compensation for Servo Mechanisms J.Wang,S.S.Ge,andT.H.Lee Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576 Email: elegesz@nus.edu.sg
More informationA Direct Numerical Method for Observability Analysis
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL 15, NO 2, MAY 2000 625 A Direct Numerical Method for Observability Analysis Bei Gou and Ali Abur, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract This paper presents an algebraic method
More informationManipulator Kinematics. Prof. Matthew Spenko MMAE 540: Introduction to Robotics Illinois Institute of Technology
Manipulator Kinematics Prof. Matthew Spenko MMAE 540: Introduction to Robotics Illinois Institute of Technology Manipulator Kinematics Forward and Inverse Kinematics 2D Manipulator Forward Kinematics Forward
More informationDevelopment of Easy Teaching Interface for a Dual Arm Robot Manipulator
Development of Easy Teaching Interface for a Dual Arm Robot Manipulator Chanhun Park and Doohyeong Kim Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, 156, GajeongbukRo,
More informationINPUTTOSTATE STABILITY FOR DISCRETETIME NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
INPUTTOSTATE STABILITY FOR DISCRETETIME NONLINEAR SYSTEMS ZhongPing Jiang Eduardo Sontag,1 Yuan Wang,2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Polytechnic University, Six Metrotech Center, Brooklyn,
More informationNEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK September 2014 Authorized for Distribution by the New York State Education Department This test design and framework document
More informationLecture 13 Linear quadratic Lyapunov theory
EE363 Winter 289 Lecture 13 Linear quadratic Lyapunov theory the Lyapunov equation Lyapunov stability conditions the Lyapunov operator and integral evaluating quadratic integrals analysis of ARE discretetime
More informationSystems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions
Chapter 6 Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions Facts that are recalled in the problems wt) = ut) + 1 c A 1 s ] R c t s)) hws) + Ks r)wr)dr ds. 6.1) w = w +
More informationUnderstanding and Applying Kalman Filtering
Understanding and Applying Kalman Filtering Lindsay Kleeman Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Monash University, Clayton 1 Introduction Objectives: 1. Provide a basic understanding
More informationMixedÀ¾ Ð½Optimization Problem via Lagrange Multiplier Theory
MixedÀ¾ Ð½Optimization Problem via Lagrange Multiplier Theory Jun WuÝ, Sheng ChenÞand Jian ChuÝ ÝNational Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology Institute of Advanced Process Control Zhejiang University,
More informationQuasistatic evolution and congested transport
Quasistatic evolution and congested transport Inwon Kim Joint with Damon Alexander, Katy Craig and Yao Yao UCLA, UW Madison Hard congestion in crowd motion The following crowd motion model is proposed
More informationAnalysis of Load Frequency Control Performance Assessment Criteria
520 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 16, NO. 3, AUGUST 2001 Analysis of Load Frequency Control Performance Assessment Criteria George Gross, Fellow, IEEE and Jeong Woo Lee Abstract This paper presents
More informationLINE INTEGRALS OF VECTOR FUNCTIONS: GREEN S THEOREM. Contents. 2. Green s Theorem 3
LINE INTEGRALS OF VETOR FUNTIONS: GREEN S THEOREM ontents 1. A differential criterion for conservative vector fields 1 2. Green s Theorem 3 1. A differential criterion for conservative vector fields We
More informationDimension Theory for Ordinary Differential Equations
Vladimir A. Boichenko, Gennadij A. Leonov, Volker Reitmann Dimension Theory for Ordinary Differential Equations Teubner Contents Singular values, exterior calculus and Lozinskiinorms 15 1 Singular values
More informationUsing the Theory of Reals in. Analyzing Continuous and Hybrid Systems
Using the Theory of Reals in Analyzing Continuous and Hybrid Systems Ashish Tiwari Computer Science Laboratory (CSL) SRI International (SRI) Menlo Park, CA 94025 Email: ashish.tiwari@sri.com Ashish Tiwari
More informationA Passivity Measure Of Systems In Cascade Based On Passivity Indices
49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 57, Hilton Atlanta Hotel, Atlanta, GA, USA A Passivity Measure Of Systems In Cascade Based On Passivity Indices Han Yu and Panos J Antsaklis Abstract
More informationA Theoretical Model for Mutual Interaction between Coaxial Cylindrical Coils Lukas Heinzle
A Theoretical Model for Mutual Interaction between Coaxial Cylindrical Coils Lukas Heinzle Page 1 of 15 Abstract: The wireless power transfer link between two coils is determined by the properties of the
More informationOptimal Design of αβ(γ) Filters
Optimal Design of (γ) Filters Dirk Tenne Tarunraj Singh, Center for Multisource Information Fusion State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo, NY 426 Abstract Optimal sets of the smoothing parameter
More informationNetwork Traffic Modelling
University of York Dissertation submitted for the MSc in Mathematics with Modern Applications, Department of Mathematics, University of York, UK. August 009 Network Traffic Modelling Author: David Slade
More informationAdaptive Control Using Combined Online and Background Learning Neural Network
Adaptive Control Using Combined Online and Background Learning Neural Network Eric N. Johnson and SeungMin Oh Abstract A new adaptive neural network (NN control concept is proposed with proof of stability
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationIntroduction to Engineering System Dynamics
CHAPTER 0 Introduction to Engineering System Dynamics 0.1 INTRODUCTION The objective of an engineering analysis of a dynamic system is prediction of its behaviour or performance. Real dynamic systems are
More informationOn Motion of Robot EndEffector using the Curvature Theory of Timelike Ruled Surfaces with Timelike Directrix
Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences 8(2): 89204 (204) MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES Journal homepage: http://einspem.upm.edu.my/journal On Motion of Robot EndEffector using the Curvature
More informationSynthesis of Constrained nr Planar Robots to Reach Five Task Positions
Synthesis of Constrained nr Planar Robots to Reach Five Task Positions Gim Song Soh Robotics and Automation Laboratory University of California Irvine, California 96973975 Email: gsoh@uci.edu J. Michael
More informationLimit processes are the basis of calculus. For example, the derivative. f f (x + h) f (x)
SEC. 4.1 TAYLOR SERIES AND CALCULATION OF FUNCTIONS 187 Taylor Series 4.1 Taylor Series and Calculation of Functions Limit processes are the basis of calculus. For example, the derivative f f (x + h) f
More informationTD(0) Leads to Better Policies than Approximate Value Iteration
TD(0) Leads to Better Policies than Approximate Value Iteration Benjamin Van Roy Management Science and Engineering and Electrical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 bvr@stanford.edu Abstract
More informationCBE 6333, R. Levicky 1 Differential Balance Equations
CBE 6333, R. Levicky 1 Differential Balance Equations We have previously derived integral balances for mass, momentum, and energy for a control volume. The control volume was assumed to be some large object,
More informationEXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL
EXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL Exit Time problems and Escape from a Potential Well Escape From a Potential Well There are many systems in physics, chemistry and biology that exist
More informationMidterm Solutions. mvr = ω f (I wheel + I bullet ) = ω f 2 MR2 + mr 2 ) ω f = v R. 1 + M 2m
Midterm Solutions I) A bullet of mass m moving at horizontal velocity v strikes and sticks to the rim of a wheel a solid disc) of mass M, radius R, anchored at its center but free to rotate i) Which of
More informationProblem 1 (10 pts) Find the radius of convergence and interval of convergence of the series
1 Problem 1 (10 pts) Find the radius of convergence and interval of convergence of the series a n n=1 n(x + 2) n 5 n 1. n(x + 2)n Solution: Do the ratio test for the absolute convergence. Let a n =. Then,
More informationMean Value Coordinates
Mean Value Coordinates Michael S. Floater Abstract: We derive a generalization of barycentric coordinates which allows a vertex in a planar triangulation to be expressed as a convex combination of its
More informationPredictive Control Algorithms: Stability despite Shortened Optimization Horizons
Predictive Control Algorithms: Stability despite Shortened Optimization Horizons Philipp Braun Jürgen Pannek Karl Worthmann University of Bayreuth, 9544 Bayreuth, Germany University of the Federal Armed
More informationA PAIR OF MEASURES OF ROTATIONAL ERROR FOR AXISYMMETRIC ROBOT ENDEFFECTORS
A PAIR OF MEASURES OF ROTATIONAL ERROR FOR AXISYMMETRIC ROBOT ENDEFFECTORS Sébastien Briot, Ilian A. Bonev Department of Automated Manufacturing Engineering École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS), Montreal,
More information6 J  vector electric current density (A/m2 )
Determination of Antenna Radiation Fields Using Potential Functions Sources of Antenna Radiation Fields 6 J  vector electric current density (A/m2 ) M  vector magnetic current density (V/m 2 ) Some problems
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More informationThe Heat Equation. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/88
The Heat Equation Lectures INF232 p. 1/88 Lectures INF232 p. 2/88 The Heat Equation We study the heat equation: u t = u xx for x (,1), t >, (1) u(,t) = u(1,t) = for t >, (2) u(x,) = f(x) for x (,1), (3)
More informationFuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability
Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, 1(2) (2001) 111 119 Fuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability V. Lakshmikantham 1 and S. Leela 2 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida
More informationEnhancing the SNR of the Fiber Optic Rotation Sensor using the LMS Algorithm
1 Enhancing the SNR of the Fiber Optic Rotation Sensor using the LMS Algorithm Hani Mehrpouyan, Student Member, IEEE, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Queen s University, Kingston, Ontario,
More informationOverview of Math Standards
Algebra 2 Welcome to math curriculum design maps for Manhattan Ogden USD 383, striving to produce learners who are: Effective Communicators who clearly express ideas and effectively communicate with diverse
More informationObservability Index Selection for Robot Calibration
Observability Index Selection for Robot Calibration Yu Sun and John M Hollerbach Abstract This paper relates 5 observability indexes for robot calibration to the alphabet optimalities from the experimental
More informationFigure 2.1: Center of mass of four points.
Chapter 2 Bézier curves are named after their inventor, Dr. Pierre Bézier. Bézier was an engineer with the Renault car company and set out in the early 196 s to develop a curve formulation which would
More information15 Limit sets. Lyapunov functions
15 Limit sets. Lyapunov functions At this point, considering the solutions to ẋ = f(x), x U R 2, (1) we were most interested in the behavior of solutions when t (sometimes, this is called asymptotic behavior
More informationPOWER SETS AND RELATIONS
POWER SETS AND RELATIONS L. MARIZZA A. BAILEY 1. The Power Set Now that we have defined sets as best we can, we can consider a sets of sets. If we were to assume nothing, except the existence of the empty
More informationWe call this set an ndimensional parallelogram (with one vertex 0). We also refer to the vectors x 1,..., x n as the edges of P.
Volumes of parallelograms 1 Chapter 8 Volumes of parallelograms In the present short chapter we are going to discuss the elementary geometrical objects which we call parallelograms. These are going to
More informationDESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND COOPERATIVE COEVOLUTION OF AN AUTONOMOUS/TELEOPERATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A SERPENTINE ROBOTIC MANIPULATOR
Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Ninth Topical Meeting on Robotics and Remote Systems, Seattle Washington, March 2001. DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND COOPERATIVE COEVOLUTION OF AN AUTONOMOUS/TELEOPERATED
More informationOrbits of the LennardJones Potential
Orbits of the LennardJones Potential Prashanth S. Venkataram July 28, 2012 1 Introduction The LennardJones potential describes weak interactions between neutral atoms and molecules. Unlike the potentials
More informationNonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion
Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion P. CoolenSchrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK email: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk
More informationMOBILE ROBOT TRACKING OF PREPLANNED PATHS. Department of Computer Science, York University, Heslington, York, Y010 5DD, UK (email:nep@cs.york.ac.
MOBILE ROBOT TRACKING OF PREPLANNED PATHS N. E. Pears Department of Computer Science, York University, Heslington, York, Y010 5DD, UK (email:nep@cs.york.ac.uk) 1 Abstract A method of mobile robot steering
More informationDetermination of the normalization level of database schemas through equivalence classes of attributes
Computer Science Journal of Moldova, vol.17, no.2(50), 2009 Determination of the normalization level of database schemas through equivalence classes of attributes Cotelea Vitalie Abstract In this paper,
More informationt := maxγ ν subject to ν {0,1,2,...} and f(x c +γ ν d) f(x c )+cγ ν f (x c ;d).
1. Line Search Methods Let f : R n R be given and suppose that x c is our current best estimate of a solution to P min x R nf(x). A standard method for improving the estimate x c is to choose a direction
More informationThe Fourth International DERIVETI92/89 Conference Liverpool, U.K., 1215 July 2000. Derive 5: The Easiest... Just Got Better!
The Fourth International DERIVETI9/89 Conference Liverpool, U.K., 5 July 000 Derive 5: The Easiest... Just Got Better! Michel Beaudin École de technologie supérieure 00, rue NotreDame Ouest Montréal
More informationLinköping University Electronic Press
Linköping University Electronic Press Report Wellposed boundary conditions for the shallow water equations Sarmad Ghader and Jan Nordström Series: LiTHMATR, 0348960, No. 4 Available at: Linköping University
More informationApplications to Data Smoothing and Image Processing I
Applications to Data Smoothing and Image Processing I MA 348 Kurt Bryan Signals and Images Let t denote time and consider a signal a(t) on some time interval, say t. We ll assume that the signal a(t) is
More informationChapter 3 Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
Chapter 3 Nonlinear Model Predictive Control In this chapter, we introduce the nonlinear model predictive control algorithm in a rigorous way. We start by defining a basic NMPC algorithm for constant reference
More informationAlgebra 2 Chapter 1 Vocabulary. identity  A statement that equates two equivalent expressions.
Chapter 1 Vocabulary identity  A statement that equates two equivalent expressions. verbal model A word equation that represents a reallife problem. algebraic expression  An expression with variables.
More informationLattice Point Geometry: Pick s Theorem and Minkowski s Theorem. Senior Exercise in Mathematics. Jennifer Garbett Kenyon College
Lattice Point Geometry: Pick s Theorem and Minkowski s Theorem Senior Exercise in Mathematics Jennifer Garbett Kenyon College November 18, 010 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Primitive Lattice Triangles 5.1
More informationSome stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model
Some stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model D. Düvelmeyer Technische Universität Chemnitz, Fakultät für Mathematik, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany Abstract In this paper we discuss
More informationDURING automatic vehicle following, the control objective
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 48, NO. 1, JANUARY 1999 319 Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control Using Front and Back Information for Tight Vehicle Following Maneuvers Y. Zhang, Elias
More informationFlatness based Control of a Gantry Crane
9th IFAC Symposium on Nonlinear Control Systems Toulouse, France, September 46, 213 ThB2.5 Flatness based Control of a Gantry Crane Bernd Kolar Kurt Schlacher Institute of Automatic Control Control Systems
More informationBrief Paper. of discretetime linear systems. www.ietdl.org
Published in IET Control Theory and Applications Received on 28th August 2012 Accepted on 26th October 2012 Brief Paper ISSN 17518644 Temporal and onestep stabilisability and detectability of discretetime
More informationAnalysis of MeanSquare Error and Transient Speed of the LMS Adaptive Algorithm
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOL. 48, NO. 7, JULY 2002 1873 Analysis of MeanSquare Error Transient Speed of the LMS Adaptive Algorithm Onkar Dabeer, Student Member, IEEE, Elias Masry, Fellow,
More informationMedical Robotics. Control Modalities
Università di Roma La Sapienza Medical Robotics Control Modalities The HandsOn Acrobot Robot Marilena Vendittelli Dipartimento di Ingegneria Informatica, Automatica e Gestionale Control modalities differ
More informationA Network Flow Approach in Cloud Computing
1 A Network Flow Approach in Cloud Computing Soheil Feizi, Amy Zhang, Muriel Médard RLE at MIT Abstract In this paper, by using network flow principles, we propose algorithms to address various challenges
More informationNotes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory. 1 Walrasian Equilibrium and Excess Demand
Notes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory In this lecture we go on considering a general equilibrium model of a private ownership economy. In contrast to the Notes IV, we focus on positive issues such
More informationSolving Nonlinear Equations Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Solving Nonlinear Equations Using Recurrent Neural Networks Karl Mathia and Richard Saeks, Ph.D. Accurate Automation Corporation 71 Shallowford Road Chattanooga, Tennessee 37421 Abstract A class of recurrent
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationUNIT 2 MATRICES  I 2.0 INTRODUCTION. Structure
UNIT 2 MATRICES  I Matrices  I Structure 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Objectives 2.2 Matrices 2.3 Operation on Matrices 2.4 Invertible Matrices 2.5 Systems of Linear Equations 2.6 Answers to Check Your Progress
More informationA New Natureinspired Algorithm for Load Balancing
A New Natureinspired Algorithm for Load Balancing Xiang Feng East China University of Science and Technology Shanghai, China 200237 Email: xfeng{@ecusteducn, @cshkuhk} Francis CM Lau The University of
More informationFurther Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1
Further Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1 J. Zhang Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing
More informationPrincipal Rotation Representations of Proper NxN Orthogonal Matrices
Principal Rotation Representations of Proper NxN Orthogonal Matrices Hanspeter Schaub Panagiotis siotras John L. Junkins Abstract hree and four parameter representations of x orthogonal matrices are extended
More informationBANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW
BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but
More informationChapter 7: Polarization
Chapter 7: Polarization Joaquín Bernal Méndez Group 4 1 Index Introduction Polarization Vector The Electric Displacement Vector Constitutive Laws: Linear Dielectrics Energy in Dielectric Systems Forces
More informationFunctional Optimization Models for Active Queue Management
Functional Optimization Models for Active Queue Management Yixin Chen Department of Computer Science and Engineering Washington University in St Louis 1 Brookings Drive St Louis, MO 63130, USA chen@cse.wustl.edu
More informationLinear Programming for Optimization. Mark A. Schulze, Ph.D. Perceptive Scientific Instruments, Inc.
1. Introduction Linear Programming for Optimization Mark A. Schulze, Ph.D. Perceptive Scientific Instruments, Inc. 1.1 Definition Linear programming is the name of a branch of applied mathematics that
More informationSolutions for Review Problems
olutions for Review Problems 1. Let be the triangle with vertices A (,, ), B (4,, 1) and C (,, 1). (a) Find the cosine of the angle BAC at vertex A. (b) Find the area of the triangle ABC. (c) Find a vector
More information