COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
|
|
- Tobias Norris
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY,COLORADO Boulder County Justice Center 1777 Sixth Street. Boulder CO STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, v. YONGBRO CORPORATION D/B/A TOBACCO KING, SANG LEAMING, INDIVIDUALLY Defendants. JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General JAY B. SIMONSON, 24077* First Assistant Attorney General JEFFREY M. LEAKE, Assistant Attorney General Ralph L. Carr Judicial Center 1300 Broadway, 10 th Floor Denver, CO Telephone: (720) FAX: (720) *Counsel of Record COURT USE ONLY Case No. COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION 1. This is an action brought by the State of Colorado pursuant to the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, et seq., C.R.S. (2013) ( CCPA ), to enjoin and restrain Defendants from engaging in certain unlawful deceptive trade practices, for restitution to injured consumers, for statutorily mandated civil penalties, for disgorgement, and other relief as provided in the CCPA. PARTIES 2. Defendant YONGBRO CORPORATION operates a tobacco store located in Longmont, Colorado doing business as Tobacco King ( TOBACCO KING ). Defendant Sang Leaming ( LEAMING ) is the owner of TOBACCO KING. 1
2 ACTS OF AGENTS 3. Whenever reference is made in this Complaint to any act or practice of Defendants, such allegation shall be deemed to mean that the principals, owners, employees, independent contractors, agents, and representatives of such Defendants performed, directed, or authorized such act or practice on behalf of said Defendants, while actively engaged in the scope of their duties. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. Pursuant to C.R.S and , this Court has jurisdiction to enter appropriate orders prior to and following an ultimate determination of liability. 5. The violations alleged herein occurred, in part, in Boulder County. Therefore, venue is proper in Boulder County, Colorado, pursuant to C.R.S and Colo. R. Civ. P. 98 (2013). RELEVANT TIMES 6. This action is timely brought pursuant to C.R.S in that it is brought within three years of the date on which Defendants engaged in false, misleading, and deceptive acts which violate the CCPA, and the Defendants continue to engage in false, misleading acts and practices which violate the CCPA. PUBLIC INTEREST 7. Through the unlawful practices of their business or occupation, Defendants have deceived, misled, and financially injured numerous consumers. Therefore, these legal proceedings are in the public interest and are necessary to safeguard citizens from Defendants unlawful business activities. GENERAL ALLEGATIONS I. TOBACCO KING sold harmful spice products 8. Synthetic cannabinoids are psychoactive chemicals dissolved in solvent, applied to plant material, and smoked as a drug of abuse. They are sold in head shops and tobacco and convenience stores under labels such as synthetic marijuana, herbal incense, potpourri, and spice. See Exhibit A, Tracy Murphy, M.D. et.al, Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Synthetic Cannabinoid Use-Multiple States, 2012, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Vol. 62, No. 6 (Feb. 15, 2013), at 97. 2
3 9. Synthetic cannabinoids are often packaged in colorful wrappers bearing labels such as not for human consumption or incense, although health professionals and legal authorities know these products are smoked like marijuana. See Exhibit A, at In Colorado, synthetic cannabinoids are commonly referred to as spice by users and law enforcement. See Exhibit B, Affidavit of Investigator Rosipajla, Colorado Department of Revenue, at Synthetic cannabinoids are sometimes referred to as synthetic marijuana. This is a misnomer. Other than the fact that marijuana and synthetic cannabinoids affect the same part of the brain, the chemistry and the effects of synthetic cannabinoids are quite different than marijuana. See Exhibit A, at 97; see also Exhibit I, Affidavit of Chris Holmes, M.D., at On June 28, 2012, Investigators Chelsea Rosipajla and Clyde Anderson of the Colorado Department of Revenue, Alcohol & Tobacco Enforcement conducted a tobacco compliance check at TOBACCO KING, located at 2255 Main Street in Longmont, Colorado. See Exhibit B, at As part of the compliance check, investigators sent an under-aged minor operative into the store to purchase a pack of cigarettes. A female clerk, Yung H. Leaming, sold cigarettes to the minor without asking for any proof of age. See Exhibit B, at When the investigators went into the store they observed two plastic display cases containing products that they suspected were illegal synthetic cannabinoids or spice (hereafter referred to as spice products ). The products were professionally packaged and placed next to legally-sold smoking paraphernalia. See Exhibit B, at When asked by the investigators about the spice products in the display case, Ms. Leaming phoned her son LEAMING. LEAMING is the owner of TOBACCO KING. LEAMING arrived at the store and told the investigators that all of his spice products were legal. He stated he was given a lab report that the products were legal for sale in Colorado. See Exhibit B, at Investigator Rosipajla explained to LEAMING that based on her prior experience with these types of products, she believed that the products contained illegal synthetic cannabinoids. Investigator Rosipajla explained that products labeled as Plant Food, Potpourri, and Not for Human Consumption, and sold alongside glass pipes, rolling papers and lighters frequently test positive for synthetic cannabinoids. Investigator Rosipajla has previously submitted spice 3
4 products to the Colorado Bureau of Investigations ( CBI ) for testing and reviewed the positive lab results. See Exhibit B, at LEAMING also showed the investigators several large boxes containing various brands of spice products located behind the display shelves. The product names included Happy Tiger, Scooby Snax, Cosmic Kratom, Black Magic, Mad Hatter, 2012, High Roller Plant Food, Prism, Jamaican, and Funkey Monkey. See Exhibit B, at The investigators removed the spice products from the store and told LEAMING they would submit samples of the product for testing to the CBI. Investigator Rosipajla told LEAMING that the products would be returned if they were determined to be legal. See Exhibit B, at The investigators removed a total of 1,049 containers or packets of spice products from TOBACCO KING. See Exhibit B, at 12; see also Exhibit D- Evidence/Property Report. 21. Two weeks later, on July 10, 2012, the Longmont Police Department received a complaint from the mother of a teenager who had been smoking a spice product called Black Magic. See Exhibit E-Affidavit of Darren Bloom, Longmont Police Department. 22. The mother observed that her son had been acting crazy while under the effects of Black Magic. The mother had heard that TOBACCO KING was selling Black Magic so she went to TOBACCO KING to verify that the store sold Black Magic. See Exhibit E, at 5. See Exhibit J-Affidavit of Carey Ferguson, at The mother asked a female clerk if the store sold Black Magic. The clerk went to the back room, brought out a package of Black Magic, and sold it to the mother. After purchasing the spice product, the mother called the Longmont Police Department. See Exhibit J, at Officer Darren Bloom went to TOBACCO KING to investigate the mother s complaint. Office Bloom asked about LEAMING s spice products and LEAMING showed Officer Bloom a box containing 51 containers of various spice products, with the same names as the previously removed spice products; Black Magic, Funkey Monkey, 2012, and Jamaican. See Exhibit E, 25. Officer Bloom removed the 51 containers of spice products. LEAMING showed Officer Bloom a purported laboratory report for some of the spice products 4
5 stating that the spice products did not contain illegal synthetic cannabinoids. See Exhibit E, at 8, 11. See Exhibit K-AI BioTech letter. 26. Investigator Rosipajla submitted samples to CBI of all the products removed on June 25, CBI tested five of the products. The products labeled as Happy Tiger, Scooby Snax and Black Magic tested positive as containing an illegal analog of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018. The sample of Cosmic Kratom did not contain any controlled substances, however, the High Roller Plant Food tested positive for an analog of a controlled substance, Schedule II amphetamines. See Exhibit B, at See Exhibit F-Affidavit of M. Scott Webb. See Exhibit C- Colorado Bureau of Investigations lab report. II. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING failed to disclose to consumers that their spice products were potentially illegal. 27. Synthetic cannabinoids were added to the definition of a controlled substance under Colorado law, effective July 1, C.R.S (5). 28. Synthetic cannabinoid means any chemical compound that is chemically synthesized and either: (I) has been demonstrated to have binding activity at one or more cannabinoid receptors; or (II) is a chemical analog or isomer of a compound that has been demonstrated to have binding activity at one or more cannabinoid receptors. C.R.S (34.5). 29. Synthetic cannabinoid includes, but is not limited to the following substances:.(iii) JWH-018 C.R.S (34.5)(b). 30. [A]nalog means any chemical that is substantially similar in chemical structure to a chemical compound that has been determined to have binding activity at one or more cannabinoid receptors. C.R.S (34.5)(d). 31. Colorado made the distribution of synthetic cannabinoids a class 5 felony, effective July 1, C.R.S Colorado made the possession of synthetic cannabinoids a class 2 misdemeanor, effective January 1, C.R.S LEAMING and TOBACCO KING sold spice products to consumers without warning consumers that the contents of the packages could contain illegal synthetic cannabinoids. 34. LEAMING provided law enforcement with a purported lab report claiming to show that the spice products were legal. The lab report was produced by a company called AI Biotech at the request of Smart Smokes, LLC, a company 5
6 from Albany, New York that sold the spice products to TOBACCO KING. See Exhibit E, at 8, 12. See Exhibit K. See Exhibit L-Smart Smokes invoice. 35. The AI Biotech lab report states that the lab tested Bag A containing Dead Man Walking Prism, Extreme, Dead Man Walking, Funky Monkey and Jamaican. See Exhibit K. 36. The AI Biotech lab report states that the listed spice products were tested for the presence of thirty-four (34) synthetic cannabinoids, including five (5) synthetic cannabinoids compounds designated as illegal controlled substances by the Drug Enforcement Agency ( DEA ). The lab report states that none of the 34 listed synthetic cannabinoids were detected. Id. 37. The lab report does not contain any reference to Colorado law. Under Colorado law, all synthetic cannabinoids are illegal, not merely those designated by federal law. Id. 38. The lab report does not refer to analogs of synthetic cannabinoids that have been specifically designated as illegal under federal and Colorado law. The lab report claims that the lab tested for the presence of JWH-018, an illegal synthetic cannabinoid, under federal and Colorado law. Three of TOBACCO KING S spice products that were analyzed by the CBI tested positive as containing an illegal analog of JWH-018. See Exhibit K. See Exhibit C. 39. The report references potential criminal, civil and administrative penalties arising from the distribution of illegal synthetic cannabinoids. See Exhibit K. 40. The report further advises that the Illinois Attorney General s office does not accept the laboratory results as valid and that the results shall not be used as evidence of compliance with the Illinois Controlled Substances Act. Id. 41. The AI Biotech lab report is effectively a warning to distributors that spice products are under the scrutiny of the DEA and other law enforcement agencies, and could be potentially illegal. 42. Consumers, on the other hand, had no warning that TOBACCO KING s spice products were potentially illegal. The contents of the AI Biotech report were not shared with consumers. 43. To the contrary, TOBACCO KING sold spice products that were professionally packaged and labeled in a manner that made them appear to be presumptively legal. Additionally, TOBACCO KING prominently displayed spice 6
7 products along with legal smoking accessories, such as cigarette lighters, further strengthening the representation that the spice products were unquestionably legal. 44. Black Magic is one of the eleven different brands of spice products that Tobacco King sold. The packaging for Black Magic is a professionally designed and manufactured plastic foil type packet. The outside of the package states that the product is JWH-018 Free, suggesting that the product is legal. In fact, Black Magic contained an analog of the illegal synthetic cannabinoid, JWH-018. TOBACCO KING prominently displayed the spice products for sale along with other legal items. 45. Possession of synthetic cannabinoids, including analogs of designated synthetic cannabinoids such as JWH-018, is a Class 2 Misdemeanor. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING were essentially selling potential misdemeanors to consumers who presumed that the spice products being sold by LEAMING and TOBACCO KING were legal. III. LEAMING and the TOBACCO KING failed to disclose to consumers that their spice products came with a great risk of adverse health consequences. 46. In addition to being potentially illegal, the spice products sold by LEAMING and TOBACCO KING were potentially harmful to consumers. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING would have no idea what chemicals were sprayed onto the spice products they sold. The packaging for the spice products does not state the contents. 47. The packaging for Black Magic told consumers that the spice product was JWH-018 Free. The packaging did not tell consumers that Black Magic contained an equally dangerous JWH-018 analog. 48. Three of the spice products sold by LEAMING and TOBACCO KING (Happy Tiger, Scooby Snax and Black Magic) contained an illegal analog of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018. See Exhibit C. 49. Various state public health departments and poison centers have described the adverse health effects associated with smoking synthetic cannabinoids. See Exhibit A; see Exhibit H-Affidavit of Sarah Bruhn, Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center. 50. In Colorado, the Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center ( RMPDC ) is a call center which receives medical inquiries on how to best diagnose and treat 7
8 exposures to poison and drugs. RMPDC routinely receives calls about synthetic cannabinoid ingestion. See Exhibit H, at 3, From January 1, 2011 to September 16, 2013, RMPDC received 154 calls where patients were exposed to synthetic cannabinoids in Colorado. Id. at out of 154 patients (45%) were less than 20 years old. Twelve patients were under the age of 15, including one accidental exposure in a two-year old. 142 out of 154 patients (92%) were already in a hospital when RMPDC was contacted, or were referred to a hospital for treatment. Id. at The majority of calls regarding patients who had ingested synthetic cannabinoids reported symptoms such as agitation/irritability, increased heart rate, drowsiness/lethargy, confusion, and hallucinations/delusions. Id. at RMPDC also had a cluster of five patients who attended the same party where they had smoked a spice product. All five suffered acute kidney damage. Id. at Kidney damage is evidenced by increased accumulation of waste products in the blood. If this waste is not removed, patients feel extremely ill. Continued use of spice products can lead to kidney failure. During acute kidney failure, the kidneys are operating at less than 10 percent of normal function. Acute kidney failure can be fatal and requires intensive treatment. Id. at On February 15, 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC ) reported that synthetic cannabinoid use has been associated with acute kidney injury after examining a cluster of 16 reported cases that occurred between March and December 2012 in six states (Wyoming, Oregon, Rhode Island, New York, Kansas). See Exhibit A. 57. The CDC found that no single synthetic cannabinoid compound explained all 16 cases of acute kidney injury. However, several of the cases involved a previously unknown synthetic cannabinoid, XLR-11. Id. at The CDC s study highlights the fact that unknown chemical compounds in spice products, such as XLR-11, are just as likely to harm consumers as known illegal synthetic cannabinoids such as JWH LEAMING and TOBACCO KING could not be sure what chemicals were sprayed on the spice products they sold. They knew, however, that consumers purchase the spice products to get high. They knew that purchasers would ingest the unknown chemicals despite the not for human consumption labeling. Despite deceptive labeling of the products as plant food or incense or potpourri, 8
9 LEAMING and TOBACCO KING knowingly sold the products for human consumption. 60. Almost all of the spice products that were removed from LEAMING and TOBACCO KING had packaging which stated that the product was Not for Human Consumption. 61. Wording such as Not for Human Consumption, Plant Food or Potpourri are so common on spice products that the wording essentially identifies these products as spice products, particularly when the product is placed alongside drug paraphernalia. 62. By placing spice products alongside accessories for smoking the spice products, LEAMING and TOBACCO KING clearly promoted the products to consumers as being intended for consumption. 63. Despite knowledge that Spice products are potentially harmful to consumers, LEAMING and TOBACCO KING sold their spice products without any disclosures. 64. Neither LEAMING, nor TOBACCO KING, nor the packaging of the products they sold, advised consumers about what chemicals were sprayed on the spice products. Neither LEAMING, nor TOBACCO KING nor the packaging of the products they sold, disclosed to the consumer that the chemicals were unknown and potentially dangerous. The Black Magic packaging was particularly misleading because it advised consumers that it was JWH-018 Free and yet it was sprayed with an equally illegal and equally dangerous JWH-018 analog. 65. The prominent display, the professional packaging, the wording on the packages, combined with LEAMING and TOBACCO KING s willingness to sell the spice products, misled consumers to believe that the spice products were legal and safe. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Represents that goods, food, services, or property are of a particular standard, quality, or grade, or that goods are of a particular style or model, if he knows or should know that they are of another) C.R.S (g) 66. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all allegations contained in paragraphs 1 65 of this Complaint. 67. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING presented and sold spice products to consumers as if they were legal and safe when they knew that they had very little 9
10 information regarding the spice products legality, and that the spice products they were selling were likely to be illegal. 68. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING presented and sold spice products to consumers as if they were legal and safe when they had no knowledge as to what chemicals were sprayed on the spice products, including synthetic cannabinoids, placing consumers at obvious risk of potential health problems and physical injury. 69. By means of the above-described conduct, Defendants have deceived, misled, and unlawfully acquired money from the public. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Failure to disclose material information concerning goods, services, or property which information was known at the time of an advertisement or sale if such failure to disclose such information was intended to induce the consumer to enter into a transaction.) C.R.S (u) 70. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all allegations contained in paragraphs 1 69 of this Complaint. 71. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING failed to disclose that the spice products they were selling might contain synthetic cannabinoids and could cause adverse health effects when ingested. 72. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING failed to disclose the contents and ingredients of the spice products they sold. 73. By means of the above-described conduct, Defendants have deceived, misled, and unlawfully acquired money from the public. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Knowingly makes a false representation as to the characteristics, ingredients, uses, benefits, alterations, or quantities of goods, food, services, or property or a false representation as to the sponsorship, approval, status, affiliation or connection of a person therewith. C.R.S (e). 74. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all allegations contained in paragraphs 1 73 of this Complaint. 75. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING falsely represented that the spice products it sold were for purposes other than consumption. Defendants knew that their products would not be used as incense, plant food, or potpourri and instead would be ingested. 10
11 76. By means of the above-described conduct, Defendants have deceived, misled, and unlawfully acquired money from the public. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Knowingly makes a false representation as to the source, sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods, services, or property) C.R.S (b) 77. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference all allegations contained in paragraphs 1 76 of this Complaint. 78. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING sold product labeled as JWH-018 Free and misrepresented their spice products as legal and safe. 79. LEAMING and TOBACCO KING sold spice products to consumers through the use of professional packaging and placement with other legal smoking products to falsely represent that the spice products were legal and safe. 80. By means of the above-described conduct, Defendants have deceived, misled, and unlawfully acquired money from the public. RELIEF REQUESTED WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and for the following relief: A. An order declaring Defendants above-described conduct to be in violation of the CCPA, C.R.S (1)(g),(u),(e) and (b). B. An order permanently enjoining Defendants, their officers, directors, successors, assigns, agents, employees, and anyone in active concert or participation with Defendants with notice of such injunctive orders, from selling spice products and engaging in any deceptive trade practices as defined in and proscribed by the CCPA and as set forth in this Complaint. C. Additional appropriate orders necessary to prevent Defendants continued or future deceptive trade practices. D. A judgment in an amount to be determined at trial for restitution, disgorgement, or other equitable relief pursuant to (1), C.R.S. (2012). E. An order requiring Defendants to forfeit and pay to the General Fund of the State of Colorado, civil penalties in an amount not to exceed $2000 per 11
12 violation pursuant to (1)(a), C.R.S. (2012), or $10,000 per violation pursuant to (1)(c), C.R.S. (2012). F. An order requiring Defendants to pay damages and the costs and expenses of this action incurred by the Attorney General, including, but not limited to, Plaintiff s attorney fees, pursuant to , C.R.S. (2012). G. Any such further orders as the Court may deem just and proper to effectuate the purposes of the CCPA. Dated this 30th day of September, JOHN W. SUTHERS Attorney General s/ Jeffrey M. Leake JEFFREY M. LEAKE, 38338* Assistant Attorney General JAY B. SIMONSON, 24077* First Assistant Attorney General Consumer Protection Section Attorneys for Plaintiff *Counsel of Record 12
COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO MARTINEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL EFILED Document CO Denver County District Court 2nd
STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. LEGAL AID d/b/a LEGAL AID US, a Colorado
How To Sue A Magazine Publisher In Cocolorado
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE FILED: April 29, 2013 5:19 PM
COURT USE ONLY COMPLAINT
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. Jennifer Proffitt-Payne,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO COURT USE ONLY 1427 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, LAURA UDIS, Administrator of the
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, v. THE FINEST DUCT CLEANING, INC; AMERICA
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. 1437 Bannock Street. Denver, Colorado 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street DATE FILED: June 6, 2013 3:16 PM FILING ID: 46EB94C2244D1 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY
Plaintiff, GREEN RIVER MORTGAGE, INC., and DIMITRY YAKUBOVICH, individually.
DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO 7325 S. Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, EFILED Document CO Arapahoe County District Court
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, DATE FILED: January 4, 2016 12:02 PM FILING
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Man From Selling A Car To A Woman
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. GARY E. MAES, individually and d/b/a
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO DATE FILED: June 25, 2013 8:07 PM FILING ID: F12A81C47581E 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS,
ex rel. BILL LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
BILL LOCKYER Attorney General of the State of California RICHARD M. FRANK Chief Assistant Attorney General DENNIS ECKHART Senior Assistant Attorney General MICHELLE L. FOGLIANI Deputy Attorney General
COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO COURT USE ONLY 1427 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. Plaintiff, Toyota
Case 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-00273-CMA -CBS Document 1 Filed 02/02/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. MIKHAIL MATS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MAZIN;
CAUSE NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL PETITION, APPLICATION FOR EX PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, AND TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS JACOB R. HORN; BENTON RAWLON BARBER (A.K.A. RANDY BARBER); d/b/a 1 DAY ROOF; ROOF ALL TEXAS; JUDICIAL DISTRICT ROOFTEAMS
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) CASE NO. ATTORNEY GENERAL ) MICHAEL DEWINE ) JUDGE 30 E. Broad St., 14 th Floor ) Columbus, Ohio 43215 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) V.
DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL,
DISTRICT COURT. EL PASO COUNTY. COLORADO 270 S. Tejon Colorado Springs, Colorado 80901 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOH1. W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, V. IMMIGRATION CENTER alk/a U.S. IMMIGRATION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, COLORADO. 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401
DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, COLORADO 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401 EFILED Document CO Jefferson County District Court 1st JD Filing Date: Jul 26 2010 2:44PM MDT Filing ID:
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, v. ROCIO TRUJILLO (a/k/a ROCIO ORTIZ); ANTHONY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, ) Attorney General, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. ACCESS RESOURCE SERVICES, )
PARTIES JURISDICTION AND VENUE
DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, Colorado 80306 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO CHILDREN S ASSISTANCE CENTER, a Colorado
MEDVED DALE DECKER & DEERE, LLC; FOOTHILLS TITLE AND ESCROW, INC.; TONI M.N. DALE; HOLLY L. DECKER; and HEATHER L. DEERE,
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO; and JULIE ANN MEADE,
STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and LAURA E. UDIS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNIFORM CONSUMER CREDIT CODE, Plaintiffs,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER CITY AND COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and LAURA E. UDIS, ADMINISTRATOR, UNIFORM CONSUMER
How To File A Lawsuit Against A Corporation In California
1 2 3 4 5 [ATTORNEY NAME] (ATTORNEY STATE BAR NUMBER) [ATTORNEY EMAIL ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM NAME] [LAW FIRM STREET ADDRESS] [LAW FIRM CITY/STATE/ZIP CODE] [LAW FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER] [LAW FIRM FAX NUMBER]
Case 2:13-cv-00279-TOR Document 1 Filed 07/30/13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
0 JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN General Counsel ROBERT J. SCHROEDER Regional Director NADINE SAMTER, WA Bar # JENNIFER LARABEE, CA Bar # nd Ave., Suite Seattle, WA ( 0- (Samter; ( 0-0 (Larabee Email: nsamter@ftc.gov;
Plaintiffs, FREEDOM STORES, INC. d/b/a FREEDOM FURNITURE & ELECTRONICS, MILITARY CREDIT SERVICES, LLC, and FREEDOM ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION,
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO, and JULIE ANN MEADE,
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - CENTRAL DIVISION. Plaintifl. Defendants.
1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California CATHERINE Z. YSRAEL Supervising Deputy Attorney General JUDITH FIORENTINI Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 1 West A Street, Suite 10 San Diego,
COMPLAINT PARTIES. 2. COGA promotes the expansion of oil and gas supplies, markets, and transportation infrastructure.
DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO 1777 Sixth Street Boulder, CO 80302 Plaintiff: COLORADO OIL & GAS ASSOCIATION v. Defendant: COURT USE ONLY Case No. Division/Courtroom: CITY OF LAFAYETTE, COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Case 1:14-cv-12193-WGY Document 1 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATE BUSINESS JETS, L.L.C. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. PRVT, Inc. Defendant. COMPLAINT
) CIVIL NO. v. ) WORLD CLASS NETWORK, INC., ) a Nevada corporation; ) COMPLAINT FOR ) RELIEF. DANIEL R. DIMACALE, an individual; )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN Federal Trade Commission 100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite Los Angeles, California 00 ( -00 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED,
STEPHEN CALKINS General Counsel CAROLE A. PAYNTER (CP 4091) Federal Trade Commission 150 William Street, 13th floor New York, New York 10038 (212) 264-1225 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY STATE OF IOWA ex rel. ) THOMAS J. MILLER, ) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA, ) Equity No. 99AG25112, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC.) PETITION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANTHONY ALEXIS, DC Bar # Email: anthony.alexis@cfpb.gov Phone: (0) - JEFFREY PAUL EHRLICH, FL Bar # Email: jeff.ehrlich@cfpb.gov Phone: (0) - JOHN C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff People of the State of California FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE. Defendants.
BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California HERSCHEL T. ELKINS Senior Assistant Attorney General ALBERT NORMAN SHELDEN Supervising Deputy Attorney General HOWARD WAYNE (State Bar No. ) Deputy
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 WILLIAM E. KOVACIC General Counsel KATHERINE ROMANO SCHNACK THERESE L. TULLY Federal Trade Commission East Monroe Street, Suite Chicago, Illinois 00 (1 0- [Ph.] (1 0-00 [Fax] FAYE CHEN
Plaintiffs, JANEWAY LAW FIRM, P.C. and LYNN M. JANEWAY,
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO; and JULIE ANN MEADE,
JOHN THANH HOANG, individually and ) L0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA FILED ALEXANDRIA DIVISION» ^ _8 p ^ Qq UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CLERK us D!3TR1CT CGURT ) ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA Plaintiff, ) )
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY
IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY STATE OF IOWA ex rel. THOMAS J. MILLER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF IOWA v. Plaintiff, LA JAMES COLLEGE OF HAIRSTYLING INC. OF FORT DODGE, d/b/a LA JAMES INTERNATIONAL
Case 2:09-cv-00064-GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 2:09-cv-00064-GZS Document 1 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. ) DONNA L. HAMILTON,
Case: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-05781 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/30/15 Page 1 of 21 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and ) ) STATE OF
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO. 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. AUHLL AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, d/b/a
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 LAKESHORE LAW CENTER Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 0 Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite 0-0 Yorba Linda, CA --0 --0 (fax jeff@lakeshorelaw.org Attorney and Plaintiff
violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act ( DTPA ). 1 The
violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Consumer Protection Act ( DTPA ). 1 The DTPA grants authority to the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of its
Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:06-cv-15766-JF-SDP Document 69 Filed 02/25/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MAZZONI
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 THE STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. DONALD STERLING WHITLOCK and
Case4:15-cv-04219-DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)
Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:10-cv-00168-JBS -KMW Document 1 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SMART VENT INC., : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: : : : USA FLOODAIR VENTS,
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff VS. LIFESTREAM PURIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC. DALLAS COUNTY, T E X A S Defendant. JUDICIAL DISTRICT FINAL JUDGMENT AND AGREED PERMANENT INJUNCTION
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, BASS PRELITIGATION
13cv8257 Judge Virginia M. Kendall Magistrate Jeffrey T. Gilbert
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RECEIVED NOV 1 8 2013 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. v. MODERN TECHNOLOGY INC., a Wyoming corporation, also doing
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:11-cv-00434 Document 1 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Plaintiff, U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Defendant.
FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION AND COLLECTIVE COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
District Court, Denver County, Colorado 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 GUILLERMO ARTEAGA-GOMEZ, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DATE FILED: January 22, 2015 6:02
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Andrew W. Stavros (8615) Austin B. Egan (13203) STAVROS LAW P.C. 11693 South 700 East, Suite 200 Draper, Utah 84020 Tel: (801) 758.7604 Fax: (801) 893.3573 Email: andy@stavroslaw.com austin@stavroslaw.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-60 REAL WEALTH, INC., a corporation, also d/b/a American Financial
STATE OF WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. Attorney General, and Audrey L. Udashen, Assistant Attorney General, brings this action
1 1 1 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, V. STATE OF WASHINGTON SNOHOMISH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, MICHAEL'S OFFICE LLC; MYKHAYLO BENDZAR a/k/a MICHAEL BENDZAR, in his individual capacity and d/b/a MICHAEL'S
Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-00946-BNB Document 1 Filed 04/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. HUGEDOMAINS.COM, LLC, a Colorado limited liability
How To Get A Court Order To Stop A Fraudster From Selling Securities In Idaho
ALAN G. LANCE ATIORNEY GENERAL STATE OF IDAHO MARY E. HUGHES Deputy Attorney General State of Idaho Department of Finance P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720-0031 Telephone: (208) 332-8092 Facsimile: (208)
APPLICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 24-72-204(6)(A), C.R.S. 2013
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 Denver, Colorado 80202 JOHN W. SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Colorado Attorney General, Applicant,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
05-1-1356-07 SSM COMPLAINT
JEFFREY E. BRUNTON #2833 Office of Consumer Protection 235 South Beretania Street, Room 801 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-2437 Telephone: 586-2636 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff,
No. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, V. THE CAPELLA GROUP, INC., D/B/A CARE ENTRÉE; EQUAL ACCESS HEALTH, INC., TRAVIS COUNTY, T E X A S D/B/A HEALTH BENEFITS OF AMERICA, E A H, EA HEALTH,
Plaintiffs, LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL P. MEDVED, P.C.; WISE POSTS, LLC; MICHAEL P. MEDVED; TRACIE D. CASTANON; BETH A. MALONEY; and PATRICK R.
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, Colorado 80202 STATE OF COLORADO ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO; and JULIE ANN MEADE,
4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in
4. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is a Texas Corporation whose principal office in this state is 601 North Lamar Blvd, Austin, Texas 78703. It may be served with process by serving CT Corporation System, 1021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and STEVE C. LEE, Acting Director of the New
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974
Case 6:14-cv-00008-JA-DAB Document 53 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID 1974 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, and STATE OF FLORIDA,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
David W. Lincicum (California Bar No. 223566) Burke W. Kappler (D.C. Bar No. 471936) Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Stop NJ-8122 Washington, D.C. 20580 dlincicum@ftc.gov bkappler@ftc.gov
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
1416-CV14463. 1. Plaintiff is a resident of Jackson County, Missouri and is the biological mother of
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR JACKSON COT]NTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE TAMMY BRYANT, Natural Mother of Kevin'Wahlers, Deceased, vs. Plaintiff ASRA, LLC dlbla 40 HIGHV/AY SINCLAIR Serve Registered Agent: Rizwan
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. COMPLAINT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, and THE OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY
- "'. --, ,-~ ') " UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Federal Trade Commission,
- "'. --, -.:li ') " :::; ),-~ --' DA VlD SHONKA Acting General Counsel 2 BARBARA Y.K. CHUN, Cal. BarNo. 0 3 JOHN D. JACOBS, Cal. Bar No. 1344 Federal Trade Commission 4 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 00 Los Angeles,
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00652 Document 1 Filed 07/14/14 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION * FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, * * Civil Case No. Plaintiff, * * v.
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES *** This document reflects changes current through all laws passed at the First Regular Session of the Sixty-Ninth General Assembly of the State of Colorado (2013) *** TITLE 18.
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM Document 285 Filed 07/29/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01396-RBJ-KLM FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. JOHN W. SUTHERS, ATTORNEY
Case 1:15-cv-00179-RDB Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-00179-RDB Document 1 Filed 01/22/15 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU 1700 G Street NW Washington,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 ANTHONY ALEXIS Enforcement Director CARA PETERSEN Deputy Enforcement Director for Litigation NINA H. SCHICHOR, MD Bar (no assigned number) (E-mail: nina.schichor@cfpb.gov) (Phone: --0) LAURA SCHNEIDER,
-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. CHELSEA WARNE, by and through her next friend, MENDA WARNE, Plaintiff,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. CHELSEA WARNE, by and through her next friend, MENDA WARNE, v. Plaintiff, GREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE, INC., a Colorado
Case 1:16-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 116-cv-00320-CBA-PK Document 1 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID # 1 Frank J. Martinez (FJM-2149) THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC 55 Washington Street, Suite 253-C Brooklyn, New York 11201 718.797.2341 Telephone
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. WEBVIPER, LLC; d/b/a Yellow Web Services; and TIGERHAWK, LLC; d/b/a Yellow
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Division DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a municipal corporation, 441 4th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20001, v. Plaintiff, STUDENT AID CENTER, INC., a corporation,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
JAMES C. STURDEVANT (SBN 94551 JESPER I. RASMUSSEN (SBN 121001 THE STURDEVANT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 475 Sansome Street, Suite 1750 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415 477-2410
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch
Case 1:12-cv-02555-RPM Document 37 Filed 11/22/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 12-cv-02555-RPM STEPHEN BERKEN, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPlAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ZOIS FILED JUL -I A 10: 38 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Plaintiff, v. Intersections Inc., Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 EVAN CONKLIN PLUMBING AND HEATING INC., a Washington corporation d/b/a SEATTLE PLUMBING
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
MARK K. SCHONFELD (MS-2798) REGIONAL DIRECTOR Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Northeast Regional Office 3 World Financial Center New York, New York 1028 1 (212) 336-0077 (Gizzi)
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
1 TERRY GODDARD The Attorney General Firm No. 00 Sandra R. Kane, No. 00 Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division 1 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 00 Telephone: (0) - CivilRights@azag.gov Attorneys
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of Michael Millen Attorney at Law (#) Calle Marguerita Ste. 0 Telephone: Fax: (0) -0 mikemillen@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEAN KUMANCHIK, vs. Plaintiff, Case No.: UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD d/b/a UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, a Florida
SCREEN SPECIALISTS and RICHARD REUSCH, individually, stipulate that the ultrasound. are prescription devices as cleared for marketing by the
CAUSE NO. STATE OF TEXAS, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS VS. HEALTH SCREEN SPECIALISTS OF SAN ANTONIO, INC. d/b/a/ HEALTH SCREEN SPECIALISTS, and RICHARD REUSCH, Individually,
CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:12-cv-02397-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA QUALITY BICYCLE PRODUCTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, BIKEBARON, LLC SINCLAIR IMPORTS, LLC and
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION.
FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE U.SD.C M1l'lta JUN 022011 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT j~~e~_1atten, CLERK FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 6(flY Deputy Clerk ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12
4:10-cv-00701-TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
Case: 1:10-cv-06123 Document #: 4 Filed: 09/24/10 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7
Case: 1:10-cv-06123 Document #: 4 Filed: 09/24/10 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND. of police reports in bad faith. Plaintiff claims that Defendants acted willfully, wantonly and in
Weld County, Colorado, District Court, 901 9 th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970.351.7300 Plaintiff: vs. Defendants: JENNIFER BELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BRADLEY PETROLEUM,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEBRA WONG YANG United States Attorney GARY PLESSMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Fraud Section California State Bar No. 1 Room 1, Federal Building 00 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles,
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-01414-RBW Document 21 Filed 01/29/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20580, Plaintiff, v. Case
Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL
Case 1:15-cv-03199-MHC Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 12 ORIGH~~AL EXECSUMMITS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILEDINCLERK'Sorn NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA u.s.o.c. -A~nCE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. NATIONAL HOMETEAM SOLUTIONS, LLC; NATIONAL FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC; COMPLAINT