Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:

Transcription

1 Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Payment and Performance Surety Bonds and Subguard Insurance in Construction Projects Asserting and Defending Surety Bond Claims and Exploring a Cost Effective Alternative for Owners, Contractors and Sureties to Protect Rights or Maximize Recovery TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Lawrence Melton, Partner, Nexsen Pruet, Columbia, S.C. Jonathan Burwood, Partner, Hinshaw Culbertson, Boston Ira Schulman, Partner, Pepper Hamilton, New York The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions ed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10.

2 Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial and enter your PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

3 FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the SEND button beside the box

4 If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the + sign next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.

5 Surety Bonds and Subcontractor s Default Insurance October 23, 2012 Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012

6 Lawrence C. Melton Nexsen Pruet, LLC Columbia, South Carolina Jonathan Burwood Hinshaw Culberston Boston, Massachusetts Ira Schulman Pepper Hamilton, LLP New York, New York Strafford Seminar October 23,

7 Strafford Seminar October 23,

8 1976 J.D. Washington & Lee Law School Admitted: Virginia, DC, South Carolina 1979 Representing Contractors on D.C. Metro System 1997 Returned to South Carolina 1998 Teaching Construction Law at University of South Carolina School of Law 2001 Joined Nexsen Pruet 7 offices in North and South Carolina; General Commercial Practice; 12 in construction practice group 2005 Published South Carolina Construction Law- 2ed Strafford Seminar October 23,

9 Wants Building Has Money Can Build Wants Money Owner Contractor Strafford Seminar October 23,

10 Build First Pay Later Pay First Build Later Owner Contractor Strafford Seminar October 23,

11 Negotiated Schedule of Values, e.g. AIA A201 (2007) 9.2 Applications for Payment Based on % of Completion Architect s Certificate of Payment Retainage/Substantial Completion/Punch List/Final Acceptance Strafford Seminar October 23,

12 Owner Bill based on % of work in place Payment based on approved % of work less retainage GC (self performs 0% of work) Subs and suppliers invoice full price. GC paid for work in place less retainage. GC never has enough to pay subs/ suppliers in full. GC subject to Prompt Payment Acts. Subs may agree to retainage Suppliers probably will not agree to retainage Owner may agree to pay upfront: mobilization; general conditions; special equipment acquisition Owner will not agree to front end loading GC Subject to False Claims Acts (31 U.S.C et seq.) 29 States and D.C. Subs Survey Clearing & Grading Foundation Rebar Concrete Framing Electrical Mechanical Roofing Painting Landscaping Etc. Suppliers Equipment Redi-mix Steel Windows Tile Paint Bricks Etc. Strafford Seminar October 23,

13 Every construction contract or subcontract is an extension of credit. Strafford Seminar October 23,

14 Subs/suppliers GC Owner Eliminate Risks Manage the Risk Risk not getting paid/not paid on time Risk of subs/suppliers filing liens/nonperformance/failure/bankruptcy Risk of GC non-performance; technical incompetence; underbidding; dishonesty; mismanagement; liens tie up financing Do Not build Bonds and Insurance Strafford Seminar October 23,

15 Mechanics Liens: An American Solution to a Universal Problem: Laws of Maryland 1791, Chap. XLV, X :... for all sums due and owing, on written contracts, for the building of any house in the said city... the undertaker... employed by the person for whose use the house shall be built, shall have a lien on the house and the ground on which the same is erected... and shall have the remedy as upon a mortgage... Mechanics Liens do not apply to Government projects absent express waiver of sovereign immunity. Strafford Seminar October 23,

16 Being surety has ruined many men who were prosperous... Ecclesiasticus, 29:18 (circa 180 B.C.) 3 Parties: Owner (bond obligee) Contract for construction GC (bond principal) promise to pay GAI premiums Surety (Bond Obligor) Strafford Seminar October 23,

17 INSURANCE - A contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay a specified amount upon determinable contingencies. S.C. Code Funded by a pool of premium paying risk takers Underwriting based on actuarial tables No indemnity of insurer by insured SURETY BOND - Promise to pay the debt of another Funded by the Bond Principal Underwriting based on performance record of Bond Principal and personal assets Principal indemnifies the Surety General Agreement of Indemnity ( GAI ) Strafford Seminar October 23,

18 PAYMENT BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to pay subs/suppliers if not paid by GC PERFORMANCE BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to complete project in event of GC default SUB-CONTRACTOR DEFAULT INSURANCE: 2 PARTY AGREEMENT Insurer reimburses the contractor for the direct costs incurred arising from subcontractor or supplier default. Strafford Seminar October 23,

19 STATUTORY BONDS MILLER ACT: Act of August 24, 1935, 49 Stat. 793 (40 U.S.C. 3131, formerly 40 U.S.C. 270a). Applies to projects > $100K. LITTLE MILLER ACTS: See, Bransdorfer s 50-State Little Miller Act Compilation (bransdorfer.net) or contact the American Subcontractor s Association, (asa.org), in Alexandria, VA. NOTE: Some States have more than one Little Miller Act, e.g., S. C. has three, (payment bonds required on all State projects), (payment & performance bonds required on most contracts by agencies subject to State Consolidated Procurement Code), (SC DOT Bonds). Strafford Seminar October 23,

20 The Miller Act Bond: FAR A Standard Form 25-A, Payment Bond: OBLIGATION: We, the Principal and Surety(ies), are firmly bound to the United States of America (hereinafter called Government) in the above penal sum. For payment of the penal sum, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally. However, where the Sureties are corporations acting as co-sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in such sum jointly and severally as well as severally only for the purpose of allowing a joint action or actions against any or all of us. For all other purposes, each Surety binds itself, jointly and severally with the Principal for the payment of the sum shown opposite the name of the Surety. If no limit of liability is indicated, the limit of liability is the full amount of the penal sum. CONDITIONS: The above obligation is void if the Principal promptly makes payment to all persons having a direct relationship with the Principal or a subcontractor of the Principal for furnishing labor, material or both in the prosecution of the work provided for in the contract identified above, and any authorized modifications of the contract that subsequently are made. Notice of those modifications to the Surety(ies) are waived. Strafford Seminar October 23,

21 2. If the Contractor promptly makes payment of all sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract, then the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond. 3. If there is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety s obligation to the Owner under this Bond shall arise after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the surety of claims, demands, liens or suits against the Owner or the Owner s property by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Surety. Strafford Seminar October 23,

22 3. If there is no Owner Default [defined in 16.4 as non-payment] under the Construction Contract... after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Surety... 5 Notice requirements for subcontractors and remote claimants claim must be for work done/material furnished within ninety (90) days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the Claim NOTE 15 Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of this Bond, the Contractor and Owner shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made. DON T WAIT UNTIL THE INVOICE IS OVERDUE TO REQUEST A COPY OF THE BOND!!!! Also NOTE definitions of Claim 7.1 [Surety to respond within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Claim] 7.3 Bond obligee (Owner) entitled to attorneys fees if Surety fails to pay amounts agreed to be owed 8 Surety s obligation limited to amount of the Bond 10 Surety not liable for obligations unrelated to the Construction Contract 12 One year statute of limitations (not enforceable in many states, e.g. SC) CAVEAT: PRIVATE BONDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATION AS TO NOTICE, ETC., e.g., S.C. CODE Strafford Seminar October 23,

23 1. RTB!! Read the Bond. 2. RTS!! Read the Statute. 3. RTB2!! Read the Book. See, Kevin L. Lybeck, et al., The Law of Payment Bonds (2d ed.), ABA (2011). 921 Pages!!!! Strafford Seminar October 23,

24 A. Coverage: Miller Act Strafford Seminar October 23,

25 Who can make a claim on Miller Act projects? Prime Contractor Materialman (proper bond claimant) 1st Tier Subcontractor (proper bond claimant) Subcontractor (NOT a proper bond claimant) Materialman (NOT a proper bond claimant) 2nd Tier (Remote Claimant) Sub-Subcontractor (proper bond claimant provided notice to Prime Contractor within 90 days of last work) Materialman (proper bond claimant provided notice to Prime Contractor within 90 days of last work) Proper Bond Claimant 3rd Tier Sub-Sub- Subcontractor (NOT a proper bond claimant) Materialman (NOT a proper bond claimant) Materialman (NOT a proper bond claimant) Never a Proper Bond Claimant (i.e., out of luck) 25

26 AIA A , 16.2 definition of Claimant includes: any individual or entity that has rightfully asserted a claim under an applicable mechanic s lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located. B. BONDING CAPACITY (NOT EVERBODY HAS IT). C. INSOLVENCY OF THE SURETY. D. TIMELINESS OF THE SURETY S RESPONSE. E. CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO SURETY DEFENSES: 1. OWNER DEFAULT. 2. OWNER OVERPAYMENT (POTENTIAL LIABILITY FOR A/E) 3. SUBROGATION: RIGHT TO ASSERT PRINCIPAL S DEFENSES, E.G. NON-PERFORMANCE, POOR PERFORMANCE, FAILURE TO MITIGATE DAMAGES. 4. LACK OF NOTICE F. PENAL SUM IS LIMIT OF LIABILITY. Strafford Seminar October 23,

27 Strafford Seminar October 23,

28 Strafford Seminar October 23,

29 Strafford Seminar October 23,

30 Lawrence C. Melton Nexsen Pruet, LLC Strafford Seminar October 23,

31 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS INTRODUCTION & GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Surety Insurance The Tripartite Relationship The Indemnity Agreement 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 31

32 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS RT(F)B: READ BOND! Bonds Are Contracts Public Projects & Statutory Bonds Federal Miller Act State Little Miller Acts Private Projects Terms of the Bond Control 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 32

33 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIMS: MAGIC WORDS? NOTICE DEFAULT TERMINATION 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 33

34 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS DEFAULT/NOTICE: L&A Contracting Company v. Southern Concrete Services, Inc., 17 F.3d 106 (5 th Cir. 1994). Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc. v. Colonial Ornamental Iron Works, Inc., 986 F.Supp. 82 (D.Conn. 1997). Dragon Construction, Inc. v. Parkway Bank & Trust, 678 N.E.2d 55 (Ill.App.Ct. 1997). TERMINATION: Elm Haven Const. v. Neri Const., LLC, 281 F.Supp.2d 406 D.Conn. 2003); Enter. Capital, Inc. v. The San-Gra Corp., 284 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.Mass. 2003) Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 34

35 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS BASIC SURETY OPTIONS: CHOOSE WISELY Surety Options SURETY INVESTIGATION Takeover Tender Do Nothing 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 35

36 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS IMPORTANT ECONOMIC ISSUES Financing The Principal The Contract Proceeds Liquidated Damages Bond Penal Sum 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 36

37 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS COMMON SURETY DEFENSES Principal Defenses Coverage Issues Conditions Precedent Limitations Provisions Impairment of Collateral 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 37

38 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS BEST PRACTICES: CLAIMANTS Read The Bond / Read The Contract Satisfy All Conditions Clear & Unequivocal Communication Preserve The Contract Funds 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 38

39 SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS BEST PRACTICES: SURETIES Read The Bond / Read The Contract Investigate & Document Be Aware of the Penal Sum Secure The Contract Funds 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 39

40 Jonathan C. Burwood Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP Office Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 40

41 An Introduction To Subcontractor s Default Insurance ( SDI ) Ira M. Schulman October 23, 2012

42 Background A surety bond is a three-way agreement whereby the surety guarantees to one party the performance and/or payment of another party. SDI (issued by Zurich Insurance under the name of SubGuard) is a two-party agreement between the contractor and the insurer that reimburses the contractor for the direct costs incurred arising from subcontractor or supplier defaults. With SDI the contractor prequalifies the subcontractor/suppliers providing the contractor with flexibility and control unavailable with surety bonds. 42

43 Candidates For SDI High Annual subcontractor volume Financial strength, management expertise, and willingness to accept the financial risk associated with SDI. Successful history of project completion 43

44 Surety Bonds Bid, performance, and payment bonds. The bonding rate is calculated based upon contract amount Protection in the event of a refusal or failure to perform Potential refusal of surety to take over work of defaulted contractor Negative Impact to project schedule and budget Personal assets put at risk 44

45 Advantages of Surety Bonds Objective prequalification Available to lower tier subcontractors/suppliers Penal Sum Limits No Deductible Established body of law regarding interpretation and implementation Available to entities that may otherwise not qualify for SDI 45

46 Concerns Regarding SDI It s the new kid on the block No guarantee of Project Completion Expensive deductibles Only available to high performing general contractors or at-risk construction managers Provides post-default funding that can prevent dominostyle project-wide delays Limit of liability may not be congruent with total subcontract exposure 46

47 Subcontractor Default Insurance Shifts burden of defaulting contractor to the insurance company Covers all subcontractors for the project Reimburses all direct costs incurred to complete the defaulting subcontractor s work, including the cost of attorneys and consultant fees incurred to remedy the default Policy exclusions The contractor absorbs the deductible No coverage for third-party injury claims 47

48 Contractor Advantages Coverage limit Flexibility Potential Cost Savings Reimbursement of Attorney s fees and other non-brick and mortar costs that are not covered by standard surety bonds Allows use of Subcontractors that may not have established bonding lines Avoids waiting for outcome of dispute resolution before reimbursement of costs to complete 48

49 Contractor Disadvantages Financial Risk Increased Responsibility Absence of settled case law Subcontractor waryness 49

50 Subcontractor/Supplier Perspective Preservation of Bonding line No indemnity required Default without termination Continuation of payments Potential vendex issue (re: default) 50

51 Owner Perspective Many owners do not fully understand SDI Large lending Institutions favor SDI SDI helps keep the Project on time Subcontractor Defaults do not impact project budget SUMMARY 51

52 Firm Facts Established in 1890 More than 500 lawyers Twelve offices in seven states (PA, NJ, DE, NY, MA, MI and CA) and the District of Columbia Practice is approximately 36% commercial / 53% litigation / 11% intellectual property National and international practice (including active client matters in Europe, the UAE, the Near East, the Far East, South America, Canada and other parts of the world)

53 Firm Structure Commercial Corporate & Securities Corporate Restructuring & Bankruptcy Employee Benefits Financial Services Real Estate Tax Trusts & Estates Intellectual Property Patent Litigation Patent Prosecution Litigation and Dispute Resolution Commercial Litigation Construction Environmental Health Effects Litigation Labor & Employment

54 Our Locations Pepper has expanded from its Philadelphia origins to 12 locations. BERWYN 400 Berwyn Park 899 Cassatt Road Berwyn, PA FAX BOSTON 15 th Floor Oliver Street Tower 125 High Street Boston, MA FAX DETROIT Suite Town Center Southfield, MI FAX HARRISBURG Suite Market Street P.O. Box 1181 Harrisburg, PA FAX LOS ANGELES Suite South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA FAX NEW YORK The New York Times Building 37th Floor, 620 Eighth Ave New York, NY FAX ORANGE COUNTY Suite Park Plaza Irvine, CA FAX PHILADELPHIA 3000 Two Logan Square Eighteenth and Arch Streets Philadelphia, PA FAX PITTSBURGH Suite Grant Street Pittsburgh, PA FAX PRINCETON Suite Carnegie Center Princeton, NJ FAX WASHINGTON Hamilton Square 600 Fourteenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC FAX WILMINGTON Hercules Plaza, Suite Market Street P.O. Box 1709 Wilmington, DE FAX

55 For more information, visit Ira M. Schulman Pepper Hamilton, LLP The New York Times Building 620 Eighth Avenue-37 th Floor New York, NY