Blended Learning Environments
|
|
- Leo Dickerson
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 23 Blended Learning Environments Charles R. Graham Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Charles Dziuban University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida CONTENTS Introduction Learning Effectiveness Transformational Potential Completion Rates and Academic Performance Assessment Access Cost Effectiveness Student Satisfaction Faculty Satisfaction Organizational Considerations Research Directions Institutional Research Faculty Adoption Models for Support and Training Learning Effectiveness Research Conceptual Frameworks and Models Role of Live Interaction vs. Computer-Mediated Communication Role of Learner Choice and Self-Regulation Conclusions References ABSTRACT In recent decades, rapid technological innovation has facilitated a convergence between traditional face-toface and distributed (or technology-mediated) learning environments. These blended learning environments try to take advantage of the strengths of both archetypal learning environments (Graham, 2006). The emergence of blended learning is highlighted in higher education and in industry training literature. The Chronicle of 269
2 Charles R. Graham and Charles Dziuban Higher Education reports that the President of Pennsylvania State University regards the convergence between online and residential instruction as the single greatest unrecognized trend in higher education today (Young, 2002, p. A33). Similarly, the American Society for Training and Development identifies blended learning as one of the top ten emergent trends in the knowledge delivery industry (Finn, 2002). Yet, surprisingly, we understand little about the nature of blended learning systems. This chapter identifies core issues and research about blended learning using the Sloan Consortium s five pillars (learning effectiveness, student satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, cost effectiveness, and access) as an organizing framework (Lorenzo and Moore, 2002). The authors also discuss future directions in blended learning research. KEYWORDS Blended learning environment: A learning environment that combines face-to-face instruction with technology-mediated instruction. Hybrid learning environment: Alternative term for blended learning environment. INTRODUCTION The term blended learning is relatively new in higher education and in corporate settings (the terms hybrid and blended can be used interchangeably). An ongoing discussion has ensued on the precise meaning of the term (Driscoll, 2002; Graham et al., 2003; Jones, 2006; Laster, 2004; Masie, 2006; Oliver and Trigwell, 2005; Osguthorpe and Graham, 2003), however, the most common position is that blended learning environments combine face-to-face instruction with technology-mediated instruction (Graham, 2006; Graham et al., 2003). Traditional face-to-face instruction involves interactions between instructors and learners who are in the same place, whereas technology-mediated instruction uses information and communication technologies (ICT) to mediate the learning experience and interactions without requiring that learners and instructors be located together. Research suggests three primary reasons for adopting a blended approach to instruction: (1) improved learning effectiveness, (2) increased access and convenience, and (3) greater cost effectiveness (Graham, 2006). Most often, educators adopt blended learning approaches to explore gains and tradeoffs in comparison with strictly traditional settings or entirely distributed environments. This chapter identifies core issues and research in the blended learning format using the Sloan Consortium s five pillars (learning effectiveness, student satisfaction, faculty satisfaction, cost effectiveness, and access) as an organizing framework (Lorenzo and Moore, 2002). We also provide some directions for future research. We have chosen to focus on blended learning environments in a higher education context, while acknowledging that significant innovations also occur in informal, military, and corporate contexts (Collis et al., 2005; Harris, 2005; Kirkley and Kirkley, 2005, 2006; Lewis and Orton, 2006; Newton and Ellis, 2005; Wenger and Ferguson, 2006; Wisher, 2006). LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS Key questions with regard to the effectiveness of blended environments include: What are the affordances of face-to-face and technology-mediated contexts and how can the strengths of each be used to improve teaching and learning? How do short-term student learning outcomes interact with more systemic longer term student outcomes? What are the emerging models for assessing learning outcomes in the blended learning environment? What is the appropriate role for students becoming involved in the assessment of their own learning effectiveness? Transformational Potential Researchers recognize the potential for transforming learning when combining both face-to-face and technology-mediated instruction (Garrison and Kanuta, 2004; Graham, 2006; Graham and Robison, 2007). Many allude to this potential when they state that blended learning capitalizes on the best of both worlds. The simple elegance of the blended learning concept can also be a weakness, however, if the focus is entirely on the mode of instruction rather than the holistic nature of the learning experience. For example, instructors commonly state that their course is a blend that consists of x% online and y% face-to-face, which is not informative without knowing the nature of the activities occurring in the distinct learning environments and how the course effectively uses the affordances of the two environments (Cross, 2006). For blended learning to reach its full transformational potential, the primary goal should be rethinking and 270
3 Blended Learning Environments redesigning the teaching and learning relationship (i.e., improved pedagogy) with efficiency and convenience as possible secondary benefits (Garrison and Kanuta, 2004, p. 99). Blended learning must capitalize on the strengths of both online and face-to-face modalities to create a more active learning environment (Graham and Robison, 2007). Completion Rates and Academic Performance Current studies on learning effectiveness in blended courses and programs concentrate on measures such as grades and withdrawal rates that are highly sensitive to factors such as course level, college, and department. This instability suggests that using course mode as an effect in comparison studies is not a particularly viable line of inquiry; however, some studies have been directed toward learning effectiveness in blended environments. Rochester Institute of Technology s pilot program reported that completion rates were approximately 95% (Humbert and Vignare, 2004; Starenko et al., 2007), and Reasons and colleagues (Reasons, 2004; Reasons et al., 2005) found that fully online students succeed at rates higher than those in face-toface or blended courses. Additional studies have shown comparable success in blended courses, yet others report them as superior regarding learning effectiveness (Boyle et al., 2003; Cottrell and Robinson, 2003; Dowling et al., 2003; O Toole and Absalom, 2003; Riffell and Sibley, 2004). In larger data-mining studies of several thousand student registrations, researchers at the University of Central Florida found that blending learning courses produced comparable or superior success rates compared to face-to-face or fully online modes when college and gender contributions are removed (Dziuban et al., 2006). Assessment At present, most assessment mechanisms in blended learning remain traditional, as they are objective, noncontextual, and inauthentic; however, as the initiative matures, student assessment will, by necessity, become interpretive, contextual, and authentic. Brown et al. (2007) identified several important student perceptions about the efficacy of assessment techniques in the blended environment. They found that novice learners believe that traditional measures such as multiple-choice tests better reflect their learning status than more interpretive measures. More experienced learners, however, report confidence in assessment activities that involve collaborative work and interactive feedback. These findings give credence to developing theories that incorporate the nexus of information literacy, technology literacy, and critical thinking into a broader concept of information fluency a foundation for assessment in blended learning (University of Central Florida, 2005). ACCESS Key questions with regard to access include: How does the enhanced accessibility afforded by blended learning impact completion rates in higher education? How does blended learning impact the educational opportunities for under-represented populations? How does accessibility interact with quality of learning? The issue of learner access is fundamental to blended learning and includes access to institutions, access to programs, and access to courses (Mayadas, 2001). The issue of quality is critical when considering the goal of access. Shea (2007, pp ) asserts: If quality suffers, increased access is of no benefit. Students don t want access to low quality programs, faculty do not wish to teach in such programs, and alumni do not wish to support such programs. Three student populations appear to have particular needs with regard to access: those far from campus, those near campus, and those on campus. The issue for these populations hinges on determining the degree to which faculty and students need alternative instructional modalities (Otte, 2005). In addition, instructional modalities such as blending might facilitate access to educational opportunities for students with disabilities. Rochester Institute of Technology provides an excellent example of how blended courses can increase educational opportunities and learning effectiveness for hearingimpaired students (Starenko et al., 2007). Fundamentally, economic principles (e.g., reduced opportunity costs and comparative advantage) yield advantages for students who are either on or near campus. COST EFFECTIVENESS Key questions regarding cost effectiveness include: What are some effective models for assessing cost effectiveness in blended learning? For which contexts (high enrollment courses, specific disciplines) is cost effectiveness accepted and valued by stakeholders? What relationships exist between cost effectiveness and student learning outcomes? 271
4 Charles R. Graham and Charles Dziuban The Center for Academic Transformation (Twigg, 2003) developed the primary models for cost effectiveness in blended learning. Using these models, several institutions have demonstrated that it is possible to improve quality and reduce costs, typically through reduced dependence on human resources. Robinson (2005) demonstrated that, by adding technology to the instructional design, quality increases, and in most cases costs are comparable or somewhat lower than face-to-face offerings. The University of Central Florida has reported cost savings, improved facilities utilization, improved learning, and continued program growth (Dziuban et al., 2006); however, return on investment cannot be determined via a simple spreadsheet calculation. Many less tangible factors contribute, including increased success rates, reduced number of drop outs, and improved faculty and student skills. Depending on the institutional context and the model chosen, cost savings may or may not be realized. Blended learning, however, offers real potential for a positive return on investment. STUDENT SATISFACTION Key research questions pertaining to student satisfaction include: What components in a blended learning environment contribute most to student satisfaction? In what contexts is student satisfaction a viable outcome measure for learning quality? How is student satisfaction impacted when students are given a range of options regarding the nature of the blend in a course? Student issues in blended learning emerge from the traditional academy and from the burgeoning online environments in higher education. Prensky (2001a,b) suggested that digital natives (the millennial generation), who expect the immediacy of technology, collaborative learning opportunities, and active learning environments, force faculty and administrators to adopt more effective pedagogies. Oblinger and Oblinger (2005) claim that for these students computers and personal technologies are a way of life. The Internet is more important to them than television, and they learn primarily through the processes of trial and error (Bisoux, 2002; Oblinger and Oblinger, 2005). We should not be surprised, therefore, that some tension exists between the millennial generation s preferred learning styles and what higher education currently offers even in blended courses (Aviles et al., 2005). Several issues mediate student satisfaction with blended learning. Some studies report consistently high satisfaction levels for blended courses (Dziuban et al., 2004), while others indicate somewhat less positive attitudes (Utts et al., 2003). Some studies indicate that students with an intuitive cognitive style experience a lower sense of community in their blended courses than students with analytic approaches to learning (Graff, 2003). Conversely, studies such as those conducted by Rovai and Jordan (2004) have revealed a greater sense of community in blended courses when compared with face-to-face and fully online courses. Even though investigators report conflicting results about student satisfaction, most studies with substantial and stable samples have found predominately positive reactions; the majority indicate that convenience, flexibility, and the reduced opportunity costs involved in the learning process are the primary factors (Vignare, 2002). These elements tend to be independent of several potentially biasing factors, such as class size and discipline. FACULTY SATISFACTION Key research questions with regard to faculty satisfaction with blended learning include: What factors lead to faculty satisfaction in blended learning? What models do we have for supporting faculty adoption of blended learning? How do faculty workloads relate to satisfaction with blended learning in the context of tenure and promotion? Faculty satisfaction is an important element that supports or detracts from the adoption of blended learning. The University of Central Florida reported that 88% of the faculty who taught blended courses were satisfied with the course and would teach in a blended format again in the future, but only 41% of the faculty in the Rochester Institute of Technology Blended Learning Pilot Project expressed a similar interest (Dziuban et al., 2004; RIT Online Learning Department, 2005). Many documented factors influence faculty satisfaction (Hartman et al., 2000). Three major elements are (1) impact on learning, (2) impact on workload, and (3) recognition that faculty efforts are valued. Many faculty members adopt blended learning because they believe it will improve learning effectiveness; some also believe that it will add convenience and improve their efficiency. 272
5 Blended Learning Environments Increasingly, faculty are acquiring new technological skills and assuming new role expectations associated with those skills (Dziuban et al., 2006; Kaleta et al., 2007). In blended learning, the faculty must master the skills of both the face-to-face instructor and the online facilitator; thus, most research reports that implementing blended learning requires additional faculty time and effort (Kaleta et al., 2007; Lee and Im, 2006; Lefoe and Hedberg, 2006). The faculty time investment can be reduced through properly designed professional development and instructional support services such as training opportunities and performance support systems. Many faculty members incur the additional workload costs because they see the benefits for student learning (Starenko et al., 2007) or because they view the extra workload as a cost that will diminish as they become more comfortable with the new technological tools. Although research cites faculty recognition and compensation as key elements in successful blended programs, only one fifth of higher education institutions report providing formal recognition and rewards for technology integration (Green, 2004). ORGANIZATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS Key research questions with regard to organizational considerations and their impact on blended learning include: What organizational components should be in place for blended learning to become a systemic initiative? How will blended learning manifest itself in different organizational contexts such as community colleges, metropolitan research universities, and liberal arts colleges? What impact is blended learning having on the traditional academy? Institutional support mechanisms play a vital role in the success of blended courses and programs. In considering an optimal institutional climate, Hartman (2005) suggested that the organizational foundation should be built on theories of practice where the academic units are able find a common ground for instructional development. He specified that the elements of those theories should address instructional models, faculty development issues, course development structures, and effective assessment designs, both institutional and at the course level. Further, an effective institutional model should undergo continuous refinement and development while the institution develops increased organizational capacity. Hartman argued that an effective institutional approach demands up-front executive buy-in and early infusion into the colleges and departments. Further prerequisites involve facultyand student-centered approaches that make blended learning something the institution is rather than something it does (Hartman, 2005). RESEARCH DIRECTIONS We now focus on two important areas for future research: institutional research and learning effectiveness research. Institutional Research Faculty Adoption Ultimately, the success or failure of blended approaches hinges on widespread faculty adoption of effective practices. We know relatively little about why faculty adopt and implement a specific blended instructional model and how they are making the instructional choices involved in course redesign (Kaleta et al., 2007). Some course redesign efforts are systemic in nature, such as the 30 projects supported by the Center for Academic Transformation (Twigg, 2003). The majority of change, however, is occurring through a process that Collis and van der Wende (2002) refer to as stretching the mold. In a campus-wide survey of faculty, Graham and Robison (2007) found that over one third of the faculty reported having taught a blended course, but many of the blends only made small enhancements to practice and did not change teaching and learning in significant or transformative ways. We need to learn how to avoid some of the traps historically associated with the adoption of technology-rich solutions, such as embracing rigid practices, status quo adherence, or a tendency for educational systems to preserve themselves by domesticating new technologies to support old practices (Beckwith, 1988; Salomon, 2002). Models for Support and Training Research supports the supposition that institutional support is necessary for mainstream faculty and students to adopt blended learning. Issues that require investigation include: (1) how to minimize increased demands on faculty and student time; (2) how to provide instructors and learners with the necessary skills to succeed, particularly in the technology-mediated environment; and (3) how to change the organizational culture into one willing to accept innovations such as 273
6 Charles R. Graham and Charles Dziuban blended learning. Other research might investigate models for faculty support and training in blended environments and what aspects of the models are transferable to other contexts. Learning Effectiveness Research Conceptual Frameworks and Models Design problems, such as creating a blended environment, are highly context dependent, with an almost infinite number of possible solutions. Researchers should better articulate conceptual frameworks that will serve blended contexts (Shea, 2007). The community of inquiry model is one possible framework (Garrison et al., 2000; Garrison and Vaughan, 2007), but it would be more helpful to have a range of rich blended learning models so designers could design tradeoffs in their own specific contexts. Role of Live Interaction vs. Computer-Mediated Communication Under what conditions is human interaction important to the learning outcomes and learner satisfaction with the experience? When and why should we be considering human interaction such as collaboration and learning communities (Alavi and Dufner, 2005)? How does live interaction vs. low-fidelity asynchronous interaction affect the learning experience? These questions are just a few that are directly relevant to deciding when to have face-to-face or technology-mediated interactions between participants or with a nonhuman instructional system. Some evidence indicates that learners in blended environments place greater value or emphasis on the face-to-face components, while other findings suggest that the face-to-face elements are unnecessary (Graham, 2006). Research related to better understanding the nature of human interaction in blended learning environments is a promising direction of inquiry (Shea, 2007). Role of Learner Choice and Self-Regulation How are learners making choices about the kinds of blends in which they are participating? Are choices being made primarily on the basis of convenience and flexibility? How much information and guidance are being provided to learners to help them make decisions about how different blends will affect their learning experience? Online components are perceived as requiring a greater amount of discipline for learners to succeed (Allen and Seaman, 2005), so how can blended environments be designed to support increasing learner maturity and capabilities for self-regulation? CONCLUSIONS Learning environments have affordances that facilitate or constrain different types of interactions and activities. Although much can be learned and synthesized from research in both distance and traditional learning environments, blended environments provide a paradigm that is different than just a linear combination of the two; for example, reactions to the use of computer-mediated discussions can be quite different in a course that also meets face-to-face vs. a completely online course (An and Frick, 2006; Schweizer et al., 2003; Yanes, 2004). In a completely online course, the computer-mediated discussion may be valued as the only means of human interaction, while in the blended context learners might perceive it as a low-fidelity, time-consuming channel for communication. Faculty and learners will take advantage of the opportunities in their learning environments based on their expectations, goals, and understanding of the learning possibilities within the environment. Currently, only a small (but growing) body of research is specifically related to blended environments. We need more research on the design of blended environments and how instructors and learners engage in the act of teaching and learning in these environments. REFERENCES Alavi, M. and Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: a research perspective. In Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, edited by S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman, pp Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Allen, I. E. and Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. An, Y.-J. and Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses [electronic version]. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun., 11, Article 5 ( an.html). Aviles, K., Phillips, B., Rosenblatt, T., and Vargas, J. (2005). If higher education listened to me. EDUCAUSE Rev., 40(5), Beckwith, D. (1988). The future of educational technology. Can. J. Educ. Commun., 17(1), Bisoux, T. (2002). Rethinking IT. BizEd, Jan./Feb., Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., and Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success in learning to program. J. Educ. Media, 28(2 3), Brown, G., Smith, T., and Henderson, T. (2007). Student perceptions of assessment efficacy in online and blended classes. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Collis, B. and van der Wende, M. (2002). Models of Technology and Change in Higher Education: An International Comparative Survey on the Current and Future Use of ICT in Higher Education. Enschede, the Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies, University of Twente. 274
7 Blended Learning Environments Collis, B., Bianco, M., Margaryan, A., and Waring, B. (2005). Putting blended learning to work: a case study from a multinational oil company. Educ. Commun. Inform., 5(3), * Cottrell, D. M. and Robinson, R. A. (2003). Blended learning in an accounting course. Q. Rev. Distance Educ., 4(3), Cross, J. (2006). Foreword. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp. xvii xxiii. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.* Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., and Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students learning outcomes? Account. Educ., 12(4), Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: let s get beyond the hype [electronic version]. e-learning, 54 ( com/ltimagazine/article/articledetail.jsp?id=11755). Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J., and Moskal, P. D. (2004). Blended learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Res. (ECAR) Res. Bull., 2004(7), Dziuban, C. D., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P. D., and Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.* Dziuban, C., Shea, P., and Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Faculty roles and satisfaction in asynchronous learning networks. In Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, edited by S. R. Hiltz and R. Goldman, pp Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Finn, A. (2002). Trends in e-learning [electronic version]. Learning Circuits, 3 ( nov2002/finn.htm). Garrison, D. R. and Kanuta, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet Higher Educ., 7(2), * Garrison, D. R. and Vaughan, N. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer-conferencing in higher education. Internet Higher Educ., 11(1), Graff, M. (2003). Individual differences in sense of classroom community in a blended learning environment. J. Educ. Media, 28(2 3), Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.* Graham, C. R. and Robison, R. (2007). Realizing the transformational potential of blended learning: comparing cases of transforming blends and enhancing blends in higher education. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., and Ure, D. (2003). Blended Learning Environments: A Review of the Research Literature, Green, K. C. (2004). Campus Computing 2004: The 15th National Survey of Computing and Information Technology in American Higher Education. Encino, CA: The Campus Computing Project. Harris, P. (2005). Training s new wave. Train. Dev., 59(8), Hartman, J. (2005). Online@UCF. Paper presented at the Sloan- C Workshop on Blended Learning, April 17 19, Chicago, IL. Hartman, J., Dziuban, C., and Moskal, P. (2000). Faculty satisfaction in ALNs: a dependent or independent variable? J. Asynchr. Learn. Netw., 4(3), Humbert, J. and Vignare, K. (2004). RIT introduces blended learning successfully. In Engaging Communities: Wisdom from the Sloan Consortium, edited by J. C. Moore, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Jones, N. (2006). e-college Wales, a case study of blended learning. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K., and Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Kirkley, S. E. and Kirkley, J. R. (2005). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends, 49(3), Kirkley, J. R. and Kirkley, S. E. (2006). Expanding the boundaries of blended learning: transforming learning with mixed and virtual reality technologies. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Laster, S. (2004). Blended learning: driving forward without a definition. In Engaging Communities: Wisdom from the Sloan Consortium, edited by J. C. Moore. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Lee, O. and Im, Y. (2006). The emergence of the cyber-university and blended learning in Korea. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Lefoe, G. and Hedberg, J. G. (2006). Blending on and off campus: a tale of two cities. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Lewis, N. J. and Orton, P. Z. (2006). Blended learning for business impact. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Lorenzo, G. and Moore, J. C. (2002). The Sloan Consortium Report to the Nation: Five Pillars of Quality Online Education [electronic version], pillarreport1.pdf. Masie, E. (2006). The blended learning imperative. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.* Mayadas, F. (2001). Testimony to the Kerrey Commission on Web-based education. J. Asynchr. Learn. Netw., 5(1), Newton, D. and Ellis, A. (2005). Effective implementation of e-learning: a case study of the Australian army. J. Workplace Learn., 17(5/6), Oblinger, D. G. and Oblinger, J. L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation, Oliver, M. and Trigwell, K. (2005). Can blended learning be redeemed? E-learning, 2(1),
8 Charles R. Graham and Charles Dziuban Osguthorpe, R. T. and Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning systems: definitions and directions. Q. Rev. Distance Educ., 4(3), * O Toole, J. M. and Absalom, D. J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: is there room on the horse for two? J. Educ. Media, 28(2 3), Otte, G. (2005). Using blended learning to drive faculty development (and visa versa). In Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, Vol. 6, edited by J. Bourne and J. C. Moore, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On Horizon, 9(5), 1 6. Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 2. Do they really think differently? On Horizon, 9(6), 1 6. Reasons, S. G. (2004). Hybrid courses: hidden dangers? Distance Educ. Rep., 8(7), 3 7. Reasons, S. G., Valadares, K., and Slavkin, M. (2005). Questioning the hybrid model: student outcomes in different course formats. J. Asynchr. Learn., 9(1), Riffell, S. K. and Sibley, D. F. (2004). Can hybrid course formats increase attendance in undergraduate environmental science courses? J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ., 33, 1 5. RIT Online Learning Department. (2005). Blended Learning Pilot Project [electronic version], Robison, R. (2005). The business of online education: are we cost competitive? In Elements of Quality Online Education: Engaging Communities, edited by J. Bourne and J. C. Moore, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Rovai, A. P. and Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: a comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Dist. Learn., 5(2), 13. Salomon, G. (2002). Technology and pedagogy: why don t we see the promised revolution? Educ. Technol., 42(2), Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., and Weidenmann, B. (2003). Blended learning as a strategy to improve collaborative task performance. J. Educ. Media, 28(2 3), Shea, P. (2007). Towards a conceptual framework for learning in blended environments. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Starenko, M., Vignare, K., and Humbert, J. (2007). Enhancing student interaction and sustaining faculty instructional innovations through blended learning. In Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, edited by A. G. Picciano and C. D. Dziuban, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Twigg, C. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: new models for online learning. EDUCAUSE Rev., 38(Sept./Oct.), University of Central Florida. (2005). Quality Enhancement Program: Information Fluency Initiative, Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, M. W., Maher, M. W., and Matthews, H. R. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. J. Stat. Educ., 11(3), Vignare, K. (2002). Longitudinal success measures of online learning students at the Rochester Institute of Technology. In Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, Vol. 4, edited by J. Bourne and J. C. Moore, pp Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Wenger, M. S. and Ferguson, C. (2006). A learning ecology model for blended learning from Sun Microsystems. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Wisher, R. A. (2006). Blended learning in military training. In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, pp San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing. Yanes, M. J. (2004). Distance education in traditional classes: a hybrid model. Q. Rev. Distance Educ., 5(4), Young, J. R. (2002). Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. Chron. High. Educ., March 22, A-33.* * Indicates a core reference. 276
The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework And The Five Pillars. By Janet C. Moore
The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework And The Five Pillars By Janet C. Moore Copyright 2005 by Sloan-C All rights reserved. Published 2005 THE SLOAN CONSORTIUM QUALITY FRAMEWORK AND THE FIVE PILLARS Janet
More informationThe impact of blended and traditional instruction in students performance
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Technology 1 (2012 ) 439 443 INSODE 2011 The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students performance Nikolaos Vernadakis a, Maria Giannousi
More informationA New Force to Push Universities in the U.S. to Go Online
73 International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 73-79, January 2015 A New Force to Push Universities in the U.S. to Go Online Dr. Noah Kasraie University of
More informationTeaching a Blended Supply Chain Management Course to Marketing Majors
Atlantic Marketing Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 Innovations in Teaching Article 6 2014 Teaching a Blended Supply Chain Management Course to Marketing Majors Ahren Johnston Missouri State University, ahrenjohnston@missouristate.edu
More informationReview of Literature Blended Learning: Using ALN to Change the Classroom Will it Work? Summer Workshop 2006. Karen Vignare Michigan State University
Blended Learning 1 Review of Literature Blended Learning: Using ALN to Change the Classroom Will it Work? Summer Workshop 2006 Karen Vignare Michigan State University Abstract Blended learning also known
More informationStudent Engagement in Blended Learning: A Three Year Study. Ron Owston, PhD
Student Engagement in Blended Learning: A Three Year Study Ron Owston, PhD Abstract 1 Student engagement is a growing concern as postsecondary institutions seek ways to improve learning, satisfaction,
More informationReady to Teach Online?: A Continuum Approach
Ready to Teach Online?: A Continuum Approach Raejean C. Young Program Coordinator/Adjunct Instructor, Department of Adult Education Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis Mary A. Chamberlin
More informationBlended Learning: What Does This Trend in Higher Education Mean to WPI?
Blended Learning: What Does This Trend in Higher Education Mean to WPI? Stephen Flavin Amy Ricci February 13, 2007 What is Blended Learning? Some face-to-face learning is replaced by online learning, making
More informationCharles R. Graham. Brigham Young University, USA. The term blended learning is being used with increased frequency in both
CHAPTER 1.1 BLENDED LEARNING SYSTEMS: DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Charles R. Graham Brigham Young University, USA The term blended learning is being used with increased frequency
More informationWhat Faculty Learn Teaching Adults in Multiple Course Delivery Formats
What Faculty Learn Teaching Adults in Multiple Course Delivery Formats Karen Skibba, MA Instructional Design Specialist University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Doctoral Candidate University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
More informationUW Colleges Student Motivations and Perceptions About Accelerated Blended Learning. Leanne Doyle
UW Colleges Student Motivations and Perceptions About Accelerated Blended Learning Leanne Doyle Abstract: Nationwide, both online and blended learning enrollments are causing a paradigm shift in higher
More informationE-learning at the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business: A Survey of Faculty Members
International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 2009, Vol. 5, Issue 4, p.14-20. E-learning at the Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business:
More informationUsing Research About Online Learning to Inform Online Teaching Practice
Using Research About Online Learning to Inform Online Teaching Practice Rachel Brown, Ph.D., NCSP! Walter Kimball, Ph.D.! Department of Educational Psychology and Exceptionality! School of Education and
More informationThe Role of Community in Online Learning Success
The Role of Community in Online Learning Success William A. Sadera Towson University Towson, MD 21252 USA bsadera@towson.edu James Robertson University of Maryland University College Adelphia, MD USA Liyan
More informationIdentifying Stakeholder Needs within Online Education. Abstract
Bozkurt Identifying Stakeholder Needs 1 Identifying Stakeholder Needs within Online Education Dr. Ipek Bozkurt Assistant Professor Engineering Management Programs School of Science and Computer Engineering
More informationA Longitudinal Comparison of Online Versus Traditional Instruction
A Longitudinal Comparison of Online Versus Traditional Instruction Suzanne C. Wagner Niagara University Niagara University, NY14109 USA scwagner@niagara.edu Sheryl J. Garippo Niagara University Niagara
More informationAccess to Communication for Deaf, Hard-of- Hearing and ESL Students in Blended Learning Courses
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Volume 8, Number 3. ISSN: 1492-3831 November 2007 Access to Communication for Deaf, Hard-of- Hearing and ESL Students in Blended Learning
More informationStudent Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Populations
Student Perceptions of Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Populations Catharina Daniels 1 Pace University School of Computer Science and Information Systems Technology Systems Department New York,
More informationInstructional Design based on Critical and Creative Thinking Strategies for an Online Course
Instructional Design based on Critical and Creative Thinking Strategies for an Online Course Simone Conceição, PhD Assistant Professor, School of Education University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Karen Skibba
More informationTeacher and student perspectives on a blended learning intensive English program writing course
Iowa State University Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate College 2012 Teacher and student perspectives on a blended learning intensive English program
More informationLarge Online Classes: Successful Design and Delivery Strategies
Research Objective The purpose of this experimental, case study based research was to explore how online course redesign might impact instructor and student satisfaction as well as student learning outcomes.
More informationA Delphi Investigation into the Future of Distance Education
Noa Aharony, Jenny Bronstein 7 A Delphi Investigation into the Future of Distance Education Noa Aharony Bar-Ilan University Noa.Aharony@biu.ac.il Jenny Bronstein Bar-Ilan University Jenny.Bronstein@biu.ac.il
More informationDeveloping and Evaluating a Blended Learning Course
Kamla-Raj 2014 Anthropologist, 17(1): 121-128 (2014) Developing and Evaluating a Blended Learning Course Bulent Dos Faculty of Education, Zirve University, Gaziantep 27260, Turkey E-mail: bulent.dos@zirve.edu.tr
More informationA Conceptual Framework for Online Course Teaching and Assessment in Construction Education
A Conceptual Framework for Online Course Teaching and Assessment in Construction Education Namhun Lee Department of Manufacturing and Construction Management Central Connecticut State University With the
More informationUsing Quality Assurance Strategies for Online Programs
Lee, J., & Dziuban, C. (2002). Using quality assurance strategies for online programs. Educational Technology Review, [Online serial], 10(2), 69-78. Using Quality Assurance Strategies for Online Programs
More informationAn Examination of Institutional and Faculty Barriers to Distance Education - Thomson. References
References Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from The Sloan Consortium website: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/annual-surveys
More informationModel for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran
Model for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran Jafar Yaghoubi 1 and Iraj Malekmohammadi 2 1. Assistant Professor, Zanjan University, Iran, Jafar230@yahoo.com 2.
More informationMETU Instructional Technology Support Office: Accelerating Return on Investment Through e-learning Faculty Development
METU Instructional Technology Support Office: Accelerating Return on Investment Through e-learning Faculty Development Tarkan Gürbüz, Fatih Arı, Başak Akteke Öztürk, Okan Kubuş, Kürşat Çağıltay Middle
More informationAs blended learning emerges as perhaps the most prominent delivery mechanism
c01.qxd 11/2/05 03:31 PM Page 1 Y PART ONE INTRODUCTION TO BLENDED LEARNING As blended learning emerges as perhaps the most prominent delivery mechanism in higher education, business, government, and military
More informationFACULTY SELF-STUDY RESEARCH PROJECT: EXAMINING THE ONLINE WORKLOAD
FACULTY SELF-STUDY RESEARCH PROJECT: EXAMINING THE ONLINE WORKLOAD Melody M. Thompson Email: mmt2@psu.edu Director, Quality & Planning, Penn State World Campus and Director, American Center for the Study
More informationMERGING WORLDS: WHEN VIRTUAL MEETS PHYSICAL AN EXPERIMENT WITH HYBRID LEARNING *
MERGING WORLDS: WHEN VIRTUAL MEETS PHYSICAL AN EXPERIMENT WITH HYBRID LEARNING * Esmail Bonakdarian, Todd Whittaker, and Daniel Bell Franklin University 201 S. Grant Ave Columbus, OH 43215 {esmail whittakt
More informationFACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE ADOPTION OF HYBRID COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
International Journal of Case Method Research & Application (2008) XX, 2 2008 WACRA. All rights reserved ISSN 1554-7752 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE ADOPTION OF HYBRID COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION Helen Wittmann
More informationA Systems Engineering Framework for Online Course Design and Delivery
A Systems Engineering Framework for Online Course Design and Delivery Ipek Bozkurt, Ph.D. Assistant Professor University of Houston Clear Lake School of Science and Computer Engineering Engineering Management
More informationAn Effective Blended Learning Solution Overcoming Pedagogical and Technological Challenges in a Remote Area A Case Study
36 An Effective Blended Learning Overcoming Pedagogical and Technological Challenges in a Remote Area An Effective Blended Learning Overcoming Pedagogical and Technological Challenges in a Remote Area
More informationElements of Quality Online Education
Elements of Quality Online Education Engaging Communities Edited by John Bourne and Janet C. Moore Volume 6 in the Sloan-C Series SLOAN C The Sloan Consortium A Consortium of Institutions and Organizations
More informationA Quantitative Hybrid Course Model for Addressing the Online Student Success Gap
A Quantitative Hybrid Model for Addressing the Online Student Success Gap Constance A. Lightner Department of Management, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, NC, 28311, e-mail: clightner@uncfsu.edu
More informationA STUDY OF BLENDED LEARNING AT A METROPOLITAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY
A STUDY OF BLENDED LEARNING AT A METROPOLITAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY by LINDA S. FUTCH B.A. University of Central Florida, 1973 M. A. University of Central Florida, 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial
More informationRelationship Between Sense of Community and Learning in Online Learning Environments
Relationship Between Sense of Community and Learning in Online Learning Environments Peggy A. Ertmer Department of Curriculum and Instruction Purdue University United States pertmer@purdue.edu Donald A.
More informationUsing Asynchronous Online Discussions in Blended Courses: Comparing Impacts Across Courses in Three Content Areas
Using Asynchronous Online Discussions in Blended Courses: Comparing Impacts Across Courses in Three Content Areas James Lehman Jennifer Richardson Peggy Ertmer Timothy Newby Xi Cheng Chris Mong Ayesha
More informationHow to Teach Online/Distance Education Courses Successfully. Sunah Cho
How to Teach Online/Distance Education Courses Successfully Sunah Cho Instructional Designer/Project Manager & Instructor Centre for Teaching, Learning and Technology University of British Columbia Introduction
More informationIS BLENDED LEARNING THE SOLUTION TO WEB-BASED DISTANT ENGINEERING EDUCATION?
IS BLENDED LEARNING THE SOLUTION TO WEB-BASED DISTANT ENGINEERING EDUCATION? Nadire Cavus 1 Dogan Ibrahim 2 1 Department Of Computer Information Systems 2 Department Of Computer Engineering Near East University,
More informationPreprint: To appear in The Learning Curve. Lowenthal, P. R., & Parscal, T. (2008). Teaching presence. The Learning Curve, 3(4), 1-2, 4.
1 Preprint: To appear in The Learning Curve. Lowenthal, P. R., & Parscal, T. (2008). Teaching presence. The Learning Curve, 3(4), 1-2, 4. Teaching Presence Online Facilitates Meaningful Learning Patrick
More informationAssessing Student Interest in Hybrid Course Delivery at the MBA Level
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) AMCIS 2009 Proceedings Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) 1-1-2009 Assessing Student Interest in Hybrid Course Delivery
More informationLearning Management System Self-Efficacy of online and hybrid learners: Using LMSES Scale
Learning Management System Self-Efficacy of online and hybrid learners: Using LMSES Scale Florence Martin University of North Carolina, Willimgton Jeremy I. Tutty Boise State University martinf@uncw.edu
More informationDistance Learning Growth and Change Management in Traditional Institutions
Distance Learning Growth and Change Management in Traditional Institutions Peter J. Shapiro, Ph.D. Director of Instructional Technology and Coordinator of CIT SunGard Higher Education/Bergen Community
More informationFactors Influencing Students Success in an Online Statistics Course at College-level
Factors Influencing Students Success in an Online Statistics Course at College-level R. Indika P. Wickramasinghe, PhD., Abstract Studies about students performance in a class are very important to an instructor,
More informationStudent Involvement in Computer-Mediated Communication: Comparing Discussion Posts in Online and Blended Learning Contexts
The 1 st International Conference on Virtual Learning, ICVL 2006 113 Student Involvement in Computer-Mediated Communication: Comparing Discussion Posts in Online and Blended Learning Contexts Amy M. Bippus
More informationA framework for evaluating online learning in an ecology of sustainable innovation
A framework for evaluating online learning in an ecology of sustainable innovation George Bradford, Ben Kehrwald, and Stuart Dinmore Learning and Teaching Unit University of South Australia In this session,
More informationFrom face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions
From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions Dr Petrea Redmond Digital Learning Research Network Faculty of Education University of Southern Queensland Abstract: This paper will
More informationAssessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective
Internet and Higher Education 9 (2006) 107 115 Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective Andria Young, Chari Norgard 1 University of Houston-Victoria, 3007 N. Ben Wilson, Victoria,
More informationAchieving the Benefits of Blended Learning within a Fully Online Learning. Environment: A Focus on Synchronous Communication
Achieving the Benefits of Blended Learning within a Fully Online Learning Environment: A Focus on Synchronous Communication Janet Groen Qing Li University of Calgary This paper is published in the Educational
More informationFuture of E-learning in Higher Education and Training Environments
1 20th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning Future of E-learning in Higher Education and Training Environments Curtis J. Bonk, Professor Departments of Educational Psychology and Instructional
More informationMaking the Leap: Developing and Implementing Hybrid and Online Courses. Professors John H. Shannon and Susan A. O'Sullivan-Gavin.
Making the Leap: Developing and Implementing Hybrid and Online Courses Professors John H. Shannon and Susan A. O'Sullivan-Gavin June 13, 2012 Ø Why develop an hybrid or online course? Ø What s the difference?
More informationBLENDING WITH PURPOSE: THE MULTIMODAL MODEL
BLENDING WITH PURPOSE: THE MULTIMODAL MODEL Anthony G. Picciano Professor, Graduate Center and Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY) Executive Officer of the Ph.D. Program in Urban Education
More informationDeveloping online discussion forums as student centred peer e-learning environments
Developing online discussion forums as student centred peer e-learning environments Neil Harris and Maria Sandor School of Public Health Griffith University Computer conferencing, most commonly in the
More informationAsynchronous Learning Networks and Student Outcomes: The Utility of Online Learning Components in Hyhrid Courses
Asynchronous Learning Networks and Student Outcomes: The Utility of Online Learning Components in Hyhrid Courses Daniel L. DeNeui and Tiffany L. Dodge The current research focuses on the impact that learning
More informationAssessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical Study
Assessing Online Asynchronous Discussion in Online Courses: An Empirical Study Shijuan Liu Department of Instructional Systems Technology Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana, USA shijliu@indiana.edu
More informationIdentifying the State of Online Instruction in ATE funded Technical Education. Programs at Community Colleges
1 Identifying the State of Online Instruction in ATE funded Technical Education Programs at Community Colleges Brian Horvitz, Ph.D. Western Michigan University brian.horvitz@wmich.edu Richard Zinser, Ed.D.
More informationThe Impact of E-Learning on the Use of Campus Instructional Space
The Impact of E-Learning on the Use of Campus Instructional Space Tatiana Bourlova and Mark Bullen The University of British Columbia, Distance Education & Technology, Centre for Managing and Planning
More informationAsynchronous Learning Networks in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature on Community, Collaboration & Learning. Jennifer Scagnelli
Asynchronous Learning Networks in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature on Community, Collaboration & Learning Jennifer Scagnelli CREV 580 Techniques for Research in Curriculum and Instruction Fall
More informationExplorations in Online Learning using Adobe Connect
99 International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-110, December 2015 Explorations in Online Learning using Adobe Connect Deirdre Englehart University of Central
More informationQuality Indicators for Online Programs at Community Colleges
Quality Indicators for Online Programs at Community Colleges Leo Hirner Director Distance Education Services Metropolitan Community College Kansas City Introduction The phenomenal growth in online education
More informationDOES TEACHING ONLINE TAKE MORE TIME?
DOES TEACHING ONLINE TAKE MORE TIME? Gregory W. Hislop 1 Abstract Many instructors feel that teaching online takes more time, but there is relatively little data available on this issue. This paper discusses
More informationDesigning Effective Online Course Development Programs: Key Characteristics for Far-Reaching Impact
Designing Effective Online Course Development Programs: Key Characteristics for Far-Reaching Impact Emily Hixon, Ph.D. School of Education hixone@calumet.purdue.edu Janet Buckenmeyer, Ph.D. School of Education
More informationCase Study 1 Intercultural collaborative learning: creating and marketing an EFL online application
Case studies Case Study 1 Intercultural collaborative learning: creating and marketing an EFL online application Kosmas Vlachos, Hellenic Open University, Greece Aušra Netikšien, Vilnius College of Higher
More informationWeb Conferencing and ICTs to Enhance Undergraduate Science Teaching
E Learning and Digital Media Volume 8 Number 1 2011 www.wwwords.co.uk/elea Web Conferencing and ICTs to Enhance Undergraduate Science Teaching MANFREDO J. SEUFFERHELD Department of Crop Science, University
More informationPiloting a Blended Approach to Teaching Statistics in a College of Education: Lessons Learned
Piloting a Blended Approach to Teaching Statistics in a College of Education: Lessons Learned Yonghong Jade Xu, University of Memphis Katrina A. Meyer, University of Memphis Dianne Morgan, University of
More informationThe Multifaceted Nature of Online MBA Student Satisfaction and Impacts on Behavioral Intentions
The Multifaceted Nature of Online MBA Student Satisfaction and Impacts on Behavioral Intentions MEGAN L. ENDRES SANJIB CHOWDHURY CRISSIE FRYE EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, YPSILANTI CHERYL A. HURTUBIS ALTA
More informationTHE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING PRESENCE IN ONLINE AND HYBRID CLASSROOMS
Allied Academies International Conference page 7 THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING PRESENCE IN ONLINE AND HYBRID CLASSROOMS Richard Bush, Lawrence Technological University Patricia Castelli, Lawrence Technological
More informationA Hybrid Approach to Teaching Managerial Economics
e-journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 2014, pp: 123-130. http://www.ejbest.org A Hybrid Approach to Teaching Managerial Economics Matthew Metzgar Department of Economics
More informationGraduate students perceptions of online learning
ABSTRACT Graduate students perceptions of online learning LaVonne Fedynich Texas A&M University-Kingsville Karen Sue Bradley Texas A&M University-Kingsville Jack Bradley Texas A&M University-Kingsville
More informationTeaching Construction Management Core Subjects with the Help of elearning
Creative Construction Conference 2014 Teaching Construction Management Core Subjects with the Help of elearning Orsolya Bokor*, Miklós Hajdu PhD Szent István University, Ybl Miklós Faculty of Architecture
More informationBLENDED LEARNING APPROACH TO IMPROVE IN-SERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE THROUGH THE FISTE COMENIUS 2.1. PROJECT
BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH TO IMPROVE IN-SERVICE TEACHER EDUCATION IN EUROPE THROUGH THE FISTE COMENIUS 2.1. PROJECT G. THORSTEINSSON *,1 and T. PAGE 2 1 Department of Design and Craft, Iceland University
More informationBlending Pedagogical Concept and Information Technology in Blended Learning: an Analysis in Sports Physiotherapy Course Abstract Keywords
Blending Pedagogical Concept and Information Technology in Blended Learning: an Analysis in Sports Physiotherapy Course Novita Intan Arovah Health and Recreation Department Faculty of Sports Science Yogyakarta
More informationBLENDED LEARNING AND LOCALNESS: THE MEANS AND THE END
BLENDED LEARNING AND LOCALNESS: THE MEANS AND THE END A. Frank Mayadas Program Officer The Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Anthony G. Picciano Professor, School of Education, Hunter College Doctoral Programs
More informationThe Future of ABC University and Blended Learning
MAY 20, 2008 STEPHEN J. LASTER The Future of ABC University and Blended Learning Eighteen months after joining ABC University (ABC) as chief information officer (CIO), Rob Smith was pleased with the progress
More informationGRADUATE FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING
GRADUATE FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING Sharon Santilli and Vesna Beck Nova Southeastern University The participants for this study were 47 doctoral faculty from Nova Southeastern University Fischler
More informationHow To Train An Online Teaching
Applying Case Study in Preparing to Teach Online Courses in the Higher Education: the Development of Case Studies I-Chun Tsai University of Missouri, United States itch9@mizzou.edu Ching-Hua Wu Tamkang
More informationGraduate Students Perceptions of Online Learning. Authors. Dr. LaVonne Fedynich, Associate Professor. Texas A&M University-Kingsville
Graduate Students Perceptions of Online Learning Authors Dr. LaVonne Fedynich, Associate Professor Texas A&M University-Kingsville Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling Kingsville, Texas
More informationPERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE VERSUS FACE-TO- FACE LEARNING OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP GRADUATE STUDENTS
European Journal of Educational Sciences December 2014 edition Vol.1, No.4 PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE VERSUS FACE-TO- FACE LEARNING OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP GRADUATE STUDENTS Dr. Paulette Harris Dr. Samuel
More informationPam Northrup, Ph.D. Associate Provost, Academic Innovation, Distance and Continuing Education University of West Florida.
Studio e TM : A Professional Development Model for elearning Pam Northrup, Ph.D. Associate Provost, Academic Innovation, Distance and Continuing Education University of West Florida Introduction Online
More informationMeasuring Up Online: The Relationship between Social Presence and Student Learning Satisfaction
Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 6, No. 2, October 2006, pp. 1 12. Measuring Up Online: The Relationship between Social Presence and Student Learning Satisfaction Carol Hostetter 1
More informationCreating Student-Centered Online Courses
Creating Student-Centered Online Courses Anita Samuel University of Wisconsin Milwaukee Enderis 644 P.O.Box 413 Milwaukee WI 53201, USA ajsamuel@uwm.edu ABSTRACT As universities reach out to global audiences
More informationDistance Learning: Facts, Failures, Foibles, and the Future
Session No. 1648 Distance Learning: Facts, Failures, Foibles, and the Future Robert Easton and John Stratton College of Applied Science and Technology Rochester Institute of Technology Abstract: Within
More informationPREDICTING STUDENT SATISFACTION IN DISTANCE EDUCATION AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE April 2007 ISSN 1302 6488, Volume: 8 Number: 2 Article: 9 PREDICTING STUDENT SATISFACTION IN DISTANCE EDUCATION AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS ABSTRACT Ismail
More informationFaculty Strategies for Balancing Workload When Teaching Online
Faculty Strategies for Balancing Workload When Teaching Online Simone C. O. Conceição and Rosemary M. Lehman Abstract: As institutions of higher education increase their online course offerings due to
More informationA Conceptual Model for Engagement of the Online Learner
A Conceptual Model for Engagement of the Online Learner Lorraine M. Angelino, Lander University Deborah Natvig, Lander University Abstract Engagement of the online learner is one approach to reduce attrition
More informationLEARNING EXPERIENCE. at University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce
AN INFRASTRUCTURE FOR HYBRID- LEARNING EXPERIENCE at University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Panuchart Boonyakiat and Porames Songsangterm University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Bangkok Thailand
More informationA Case for Change elearning Integration at York University Summary and Recommended Actions
A Case for Change elearning Integration at York University Summary and Recommended Actions Prepared for: Rhonda Lenton, Vice President Academic and Provost Prepared by the Members of the Academic Technology
More informationInstructional Strategies: What Do Online Students Prefer?
Instructional Strategies: What Do Online Students Prefer? Kristen Cuthrell Assistant Professor East Carolina University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Greenville, NC USA cuthrellma@ecu.edu
More informationBlended Learning W H I T E P A P E R
Blended Learning W H I T E P A P E R INTRODUCTION The use of technology in the classroom to augment teaching and learning has increased over the past decade. This increased access to technology in the
More informationConstructivism: A Holistic Approach to Teaching and Learning
Constructivism: A Holistic Approach to Teaching and Learning Janet Giesen Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center Northern Illinois University Introductions Your name Your department or unit
More informationTeaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University
Teaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between
More informationHybrid Course Overview and Procedures. Prepared by. Dr. Bonnie Grohe. Interim Director of Faculty Development. June 2013
Hybrid Course Overview and Procedures Prepared by Dr. Bonnie Grohe Interim Director of Faculty Development June 2013 Table of Contents OVERVIEW AND RATIONALE... 3 BASIC DEFINITIONS AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS...
More informationHow To Find Out If Distance Education Is A Good Thing For A Hispanic Student
Spring 2010 Students Perceptions and Opinions of Online Courses: A Qualitative Inquiry A Report by South Texas College s Office of Research & Analytical Services South Texas College Spring 2010 Inquiries
More informationUsing Technology to Engage Students and Build Learning Communities to Inform Instructional Decisions
Athens Journal of Education February 2014 Using Technology to Engage Students and Build Learning Communities to Inform Instructional Decisions By Carol Todd Victoria Anyikwa Nancy Ryan Patricia Tobin Nancy
More informationCritical Thinking in Online Discussion Forums
Critical Thinking in Online Discussion Forums Research Notes Bob Loser (rloser@nvcc.edu) Northern Virginia Community College 2012 1 2 Garrison et al. (2000) Summary of the Community of Inquiry (COI) Theory
More informationA BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH TO TEACHING FIRST YEAR ACCOUNTING
A BLENDED LEARNING APPROACH TO TEACHING FIRST YEAR ACCOUNTING Deborah Delaney, Lisa McManus, Chew Ng Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics,Griffith University, Queensland, (AUSTRALIA) d.delaney@griffith.edu.au
More informationSTUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING AND INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS USE OF ONLINE TOOLS
STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE LEARNING AND INSTRUCTIONAL TOOLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS USE OF ONLINE TOOLS Dr. David A. Armstrong Ed. D. D Armstrong@scu.edu ABSTRACT The purpose
More information