Three-Star Composite Rating Method
|
|
- Marcia Chase
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Three-Star Composite Rating Method CheckPoint uses three-star composite ratings to enable consumers to more quickly and easily interpret information about hospital quality measures. Composite ratings combine individual measures into a single rating to summarize the overall quality of care for a specific clinical condition or quality topic. The method used for CheckPoint composite ratings combines the methods used by HealthPartners 1 and The Joint Commission 2. The method uses a four-step process of: Determine whether each measure within the composite is statistically different from the Wisconsin average for that measure; Calculate the Quality Score for each measure, based on the statistical difference; Calculate the Composite Score for the group of measures assigned to the composite; and Assign a three-star Composite Rating. 1) Determine statistical difference for each measure A confidence interval is calculated for each measure and then compared to the state average or a Target Range for that measure. a) Calculation of Confidence Intervals i) Confidence intervals will be calculated for measures with a denominator >25. ii) When a confidence interval is supplied with the data source, that confidence interval is used to determine statistical significance. This includes Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mortality, readmission and infection measures. It also includes mortality and patient safety indicators calculated with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) software. iii) When a confidence interval does not already exist one is calculated using the Wilson Score Interval method. This method is more reliable than the Normal Approximation Interval method, particularly when sample sizes are small and/or the performance level is near 100 or zero. Wilson Score Interval Method Calculation b) Compare to State Average or Target Range i) If the confidence interval was supplied with the data the individual hospital s confidence interval is compared to the state average for that measure. ii) If a confidence interval was calculated using the Wilson Score Method the confidence interval is compared to a Target Range. (1) When the direction of desired improvement is an increase in the measure rate, the target range consists of an upper and lower target limit computed as follows: (a) If the state average is greater than or equal to 0.95 then the upper target limit and lower target limit will both be set to (b) If the state average is less than 0.95 and greater than or equal to 0.90, then the upper target limit is set to 0.95 and the lower target limit is set to the state average. (c) If the state average is less than 0.90, then the lower target limit is set to the state average and the upper target limit is the average of the state average and
2 Examples: State Average Lower Target Limit Upper Target Limit (2) When the direction of desired improvement is a decrease, the then target range consists of an upper target limit and lower target limit computed as follows: (a) If the state average is less than or equal to 0.05 then the upper target limit and lower target limit will both be set to (b) If the state average is greater than 0.05 and less than or equal to 0.10, then the lower target limit is set to 0.05 and the upper target limit is set to the state average. (c) If the state average is greater than 0.10 then the upper target limit is set to the average of the state average and zero, and the lower target limit is set to Examples: State Average Lower Target Limit Upper Target Limit c) Classify the Difference Between Hospital Performance and the State Performance Compare confidence interval for hospital, on each measure, to the state average or target range and classify as No Different, Better Than or Worse Than the overall state performance. i) HCAHPS analysis is based on Always survey responses and utilizes the following logic for comparing each survey domain, overall satisfaction and willingness to recommend 1 : (a) If the hospital score is >75 the hospital is Better Than other hospitals in the state. (b) If the hospital score is >70 or <75 the hospital is No Different from other hospitals in the state. (c) If the hospital score is <70 the hospital is Worse Than other hospitals in the state. ii) For measures where lower performance is better, such as mortality, infections and readmissions, the following logic is used 2 : (a) If the state average or target range for the measure overlaps a hospital s lower and upper confidence intervals the hospital is No Different from other hospitals in the state. (b) If the state average or target range is entirely above a hospital s upper confidence interval the hospital is Better Than other hospitals in the state. If a hospital has a rate of zero, they will be scored as Better Than regardless of the sample size and confidence interval. (c) If the state average or target range is entirely below a hospital s lower confidence interval the hospital is Worse Than other hospitals in the state. 2
3 iii) For measures where higher performance is better, such as process measures, the following logic is used 2 : (a) If the state average or target range for the measure overlaps a hospital s lower and upper confidence intervals the hospital is No Different from other hospitals in the state. (b) If the state average or target range is entirely below a hospital s lower confidence interval the hospital is Better Than other hospitals in the state. If a hospital has a rate of 100 they will be scored as Better Than regardless of their sample size or confidence interval. (c) If the state average or target range is entirely above a hospital s upper confidence interval the hospital is Worse Than other hospitals in the state. 2) Calculate a Quality Score for Each Measure A Quality Score is assigned to each measure based on their statistical difference from the other hospitals in the state. a) Calculation of Raw Quality Score i) Measures that were Better Than other hospitals receive a score of 1.0 ii) Measures that were No Different from other hospitals receive a score of 0.5 3
4 iii) Measures that were Worse Than other hospitals receive a score of 0.0 Example: If Target Range = % Hospital Numerator Denominator Hospital Rate Statistical Difference Raw Quality Score A % No Different 0.5 B % Worse Than 0 C % Better Than 1.0 D % No Different 0.5 E % NA Sample is <25 NA F % Better Than 1.0 b) Weighting of Raw Score i) The weighted score for HCAHPS domains/questions equal the Raw Quality Score x 1.0. ii) The weighted score for process measures equal the Raw Quality Score x 1.0. Process measures are measures that indicate whether the appropriate care was provided. iii) The weighted score for outcome measures equal the Raw Quality Score x 1.5. Outcome measures are measures that reflect the patient s response to care, including mortality, readmissions and hospital acquired conditions. Example for Stroke: Raw Weighted = Measure Quality Score Weight Quality Score STK-2 - Antithrombotics on discharge STK-3 - Anticoag for atrial fib/flutter STK-5 - Early antithrombotics STK-6 Discharged on statins STK-8 Patient education STK-10 Assessed for rehab Stroke mortality Weighted Score ) Calculate a Composite Score for a Group of Measures a) A hospital must participate in all measures that comprise the Composite Rating to receive a composite rating. If a hospital has chosen to not report data for any of the composite measures they will be reported as DNR Did Not Report. b) Each composite will have three or more measures. A list of the measures used for each Composite Rating is provided in Appendix A c) A hospital must have a denominator >25 for the measure to be included in the Composite Score. At least half of the measures must have valid denominators to calculate a Composite Score. If the hospital participates in all of the measures but does not meet the minimum sample size for at least half of the measures their composite will be reported as + Insufficient Sample Sizes to Calculate a Composite. d) The Composite Score is the sum of the weighted scores divided by the total possible weighted points. 4
5 Example for Stroke: Raw Weighted = Measure Quality Score Weight Quality Score STK-2 - Antithrombotics on discharge STK-3 - Anticoag for atrial fib/flutter STK-5 - Early antithrombotics STK-6 Discharged on statins STK-8 Patient education STK-10 Assessed for rehab Stroke mortality Totals Composite Score 0.57 (4.25/7.5) 4) Assign a Composite Rating A three-star rating is assigned using the Composite Score calculated in step 3. a) Composite Scores <0.33 receive a one-star rating b) Composite Scores >0.33 and <0.67 receive a two-star rating c) Composite Scores >0.67 receive a three-star rating Exhibit 3: Composite Ratings Example and Composite Key Weighted Composite Comments Quality Score Rating Hospital A star Hospital B star Hospital C star Hospital D DNR Hospital did not participate in all measures Hospital E + Hospital participates in all measures but did not have a sample size of >25 in at least half of the measures Hospital G NA Hospital does not provide the services rated by this composite References: 1. HealthPartners ; Cost and Quality Assessment Documentation The Joint Commission 2011 Health Care Professional Quality Report User Guide - 5
6 Appendix A Composite Ratings and Component Measures Composite Rating Birth Heart Attack Heart Failure Infections Mortality Patient Satisfaction Pneumonia Readmissions Stroke Component Measures Cesarean section Early elective delivery (PC-01) Newborn Screening Turnaround Time PCI within 90 minutes (AMI-8a) Heart attack 30-Day mortality Heart attack 30-Day readmission Left ventricular failure assessment (HF-2) Heart failure 30-Day mortality Heart failure 30-Day readmission Central line associated blood stream infection Catheter associated urinary tract infection Colon surgery surgical site infection Abdominal hysterectomy surgical site infection Acute stroke mortality Gastrointestinal hemorrhage mortality Abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality (2013 data excluded pending source software issue resolution) Coronary bypass mortality Coronary angioplasty mortality Carotid endarterectomy mortality Craniotomy mortality Hip replacement mortality Hip fracture mortality Pneumonia mortality Heart failure mortality Heart attack mortality Overall satisfaction Patient would recommend hospital Doctor communication Nurse communication Patients received help they needed Staff explained medications Pain control Hospital was quiet at night Patient room was clean Staff provided discharge instructions Appropriate antibiotic (PN-6) Pneumonia 30-Day mortality Pneumonia 30-Day readmission Pneumonia 30-Day readmission Heart failure 30-Day readmission Heart attack 30-Day readmission All Cause Readmission Antithrombotics on discharge (STK-2) Anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation/flutter (STK-3) Early antithrombotics (STK-5) 6
7 Composite Rating Surgery Component Measures Discharged on statin (STK-6) Patient education (STK-8) Assessment for rehabilitation (STK-10) Stroke mortality Antibiotics within 1 hour of incision (SCIP-Inf-1) Appropriate antibiotics (SCIP-Inf-2) Antibiotics stopped within 48 hours of surgery (SCIP-Inf-3) Clot prevention given (SCIP-VTE-2) Urinary catheter removal (SCIP-Inf-9) Perioperative beta blockers (SCIP-CARD-2) 7
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Acute Care Hospital Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 Quality Improvement Program Measures
ID Me asure Name NQF # - (HRRP) ID Me asure Name NQF # - (HRRP) ID Me asure Name NQF # - (HRRP) CMS Measures Fiscal Year 2018 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Acute Care Fiscal Year (FY)
More informationCMS Office of Public Affairs 202-690-6145 MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM
For Immediate Release: Friday, January 07, 2011 Contact: CMS Office of Public Affairs 202-690-6145 MEDICARE PROPOSES NEW HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED PURCHASING PROGRAM OVERVIEW: Today the Centers for Medicare
More informationValue Based Purchasing Hospital Program FY 13 Final Rule
SPECIAL REPORT: Value Based Purchasing Hospital Program FY 13 Final Rule August 7, 2012 Washington Strategic Consulting 1825 Eye Street, NW, Suite #600 Washington, DC 20006 www.wscdc.com www.wscblog.com
More informationNational Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program
National Provider Call: Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program Fiscal Year 2016 Overview for Beneficiaries, Providers and Stakeholders Cindy Tourison, MSHI Lead, Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting
More informationChapter Seven Value-based Purchasing
Chapter Seven Value-based Purchasing Value-based purchasing (VBP) is a pay-for-performance program that affects a significant and growing percentage of Medicare reimbursement for medical providers. It
More informationHospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program
Clinical Process Measures Program Changes for Fiscal Year 2014 Beginning with January 1, 2012 discharges; hospitals will begin data collection and submission for 4 new measures. Hospitals will not be required
More informationCLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FINALIZED FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS BEGINNING WITH FY 2014
CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES FINALIZED FOR ELIGIBLE HOSPITALS AND CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS BEGINNING WITH FY 2014 e 55 0495 2 Emergency Department (ED)- 1 Emergency Department Throughput Median time from
More informationHospital Value-based Purchasing Specifications 2016 Updated August 2015
Description Methodology Measurement Period Allowable Exclusions Total Performance Score Individual measures CMS incentive program for PPS hospitals. The purpose is to achieve value by tying payment to
More informationValue-Based Purchasing Program Overview. Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012
Value-Based Purchasing Program Overview Maida Soghikian, MD Grand Rounds Scripps Green Hospital November 28, 2012 Presentation Overview Background and Introduction Inpatient Quality Reporting Program Value-Based
More informationTime for a Cool Change Measure and Compare
Time for a Cool Change Measure and BRENDA BARTKOWSKI, CMA, CCA, BS HPA M ANAGER, C LINICAL D ATA A BSTRACTION About Amphion Dedicated core measure staff Experienced leadership in healthcare technology
More informationValue-Based Purchasing
Emerging Topics in Healthcare Reform Value-Based Purchasing Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Value-Based Purchasing The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) established the Hospital Value-Based
More informationFY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar
FY 2015 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Provisions Webinar June 2, 2014 AAMC Staff: Scott Wetzel, swetzel@aamc.org Mary Wheatley, mwheatley@aamc.org The AAMC has moved. New Address: 655 K Street, Washington
More informationwhat value-based purchasing means to your hospital
Paul Shoemaker what value-based purchasing means to your hospital CMS has devised an intricate way to measure a hospital s quality of care to determine whether the hospital qualifies for incentive payments
More informationHospital Report Card Reporting Manual
Vermont Department of Health Hospital Report Card Reporting Manual (REVISED May, 206) Issued: May 206 206 HOSPITAL REPORT CARD REPORTING MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 REPORTING SPECIFICATIONS
More informationValue Based Purchasing (VBP) Awareness Brief. FY 2018 Value Based Purchasing Program Domain Weighting
Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Awareness Brief This Awareness Brief provides a high level summary understanding of value based purchasing. The Hospital Value Based Purchasing (VBP) Program adjusts hospitals
More informationAmerica s Hospitals: Improving Quality and Safety
America s Hospitals: Improving Quality and Safety The Joint Commission s Annual Report 2014 Top Performer on Key Quality Measures America s Hospitals: Improving Quality and Safety The Joint Commission
More informationconvey the clinical quality measure's title, number, owner/developer and contact
CMS-0033-P 153 convey the clinical quality measure's title, number, owner/developer and contact information, and a link to existing electronic specifications where applicable. TABLE 20: Proposed Clinical
More informationQuality and Business Intelligence in Healthcare
Quality and Business Intelligence in Healthcare John Neider Siemens Healthcare Solutions Agenda Overview of Quality and Financial Impact. What is the Hospital Impact? Where is Quality Headed? How can Finance
More informationRelevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals
Policy Brief #5 January 0 Relevant Quality Measures for Critical Access Hospitals Michelle Casey MS, Ira Moscovice PhD, Jill Klingner RN, PhD, Shailendra Prasad MD, MPH University of Minnesota Rural Health
More informationEHR Meaningful Use 2014 (Stage 1 & 2) DR Reporting Strategies
EHR Meaningful Use 2014 (Stage 1 & 2) DR Reporting Strategies International MUSE Conference 2013 Educational Session: #1179 Date: Friday May 31 at 3:30 pm Presenter: Glen D Abate Session Agenda CMS EHR
More informationWhat Value Are We Gaining from Value-Based Purchasing?
WHITE PAPER: What Value Are We Gaining from Value-Based Purchasing? Authors: Brooke Palkie, EdD, RHIA and David Marc, MBA, CHDA Copyright 2015 Panacea Healthcare Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved Executive
More informationMU Stage 2: Domains and Details. Anita Karcz MD Chief Medical Officer Institute for Health Metrics February 5, 2014 anita@healthmetrics.
MU Stage 2: Domains and Details Anita Karcz MD Chief Medical Officer Institute for Health Metrics February 5, 2014 anita@healthmetrics.org Welcome to the Webinar If you cannot hear any sound or if you
More informationPatient Experience. The Cleveland Clinic Journey. American Medical Group Association Orlando, Florida March 14, 2013
Patient Experience The Cleveland Clinic Journey American Medical Group Association Orlando, Florida March 14, 2013 James Merlino, MD Chief Experience Officer Overview How did Cleveland Clinic change their
More informationOverview and Legal Context
Impact of ACOs on Physician/Provider Membership Decisions 0 Overview and Legal Context Michael R. Callahan Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP Vice Chair, Medical Staff Credentialing and Peer Review Practice Group
More informationValue Based Purchasing and You
Value Based Purchasing and You David Gourley, RRT, MHA, FAARC Director of Clinical Services and Risk Management Millennium Respiratory Services Whippany, New Jersey Value Based Purchasing and You Overview
More informationHospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program: Part 1 of 4: A Detailed Review of the Final CMS FY 2014 IPPS Rule
Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program: Part 1 of 4: A Detailed Review of the Final CMS FY IPPS Rule - 1 - Welcome and Introductions Vicky Mahn DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ VP Research and Market Insights
More informationOverview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017
Overview of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Bethany Wheeler Hospital VBP Program Support Contract Lead HSAG February 17, 2015 2 p.m. ET Purpose This event will provide an
More informationMedicare s Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, a New Era in Medicare Reimbursement by Daniel J. Hettich
Medicare s Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program, a New Era in Medicare Reimbursement by Daniel J. Hettich Medicare s new hospital inpatient value-based purchasing ( VBP ) program, mandated by the Affordable
More informationMedical Billing, Emar & Prescription Safety
Medication Quality and Health Information Technology Prescribing CPOE Ajit Appari, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Fellow Center for Digital Strategies Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College Hanover, NH
More informationClinical Quality Measures. for 2014
Clinical Quality Measures for 2014 Mission of OFMQHIT To advance the implementation and use of vital health information technology to improve healthcare quality, efficiency and safety by assisting physician
More information2015 Hospital Measures
2015 Hospital Measures Vicki Tang Olson, Stratis Health David Hesse, Minnesota Department of Health Statewide Quality Reporting and Measurement System (SQRMS) Annual Update January 14, 2015 Objectives
More informationPartnership for Healthcare Payment Reform Total Knee Replacement Pilot Quality Report Quarter 1 Quarter 4, 2013
Partnership for Healthcare Payment Reform Total Knee Replacement Pilot Quality Report Quarter 1 Quarter 4, 2013 Introduction This report outlines the total knee replacement pilot quality results for care
More informationAnMed Health Disparities Dashboard
AnMed Health Quick Facts 588 Bed Acute Care System Level II Trauma Center Emergency Department visits: 112,329 Admissions: 23,489 Active Medical Staff: 455 Employees: 3,511 Source : CY2013 Setting the
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES & 42 CFR 412 45 CFR
1 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 42 CFR Part 412 Office of the Secretary 45 CFR Part 170[CMS-1632-P] RIN-0938-AS41 Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient
More informationOpen and Honest Care in your Local Hospital
Open and Honest Care in your Local Hospital The Open and Honest Care: Driving Improvement Programme aims to support organisations to become more transparent and consistent in publishing safety, experience
More informationMeaningful Use (MU) Education
Meaningful Use (MU) Education The 2014 MU training program has been developed to ensure high quality patient outcomes in conjunction with meeting CMS regulatory requirements. The new charting and ordering
More informationHCAHPS, Value-Based Purchasing and A Culture of Always
Objectives HCAHPS, Value-Based Purchasing and A Culture of Always Karen Cook, RN BSN www.studergroup.com 1. Describe the history and current usage of the CAHPS family of surveys and other relevant outpatient
More informationA Review of the Hospital Performance Data Expansion Policy and Outpatient Measures Data Requirements
A Review of the Hospital Performance Data Expansion Policy and Outpatient Measures Data Requirements Theressa Lee, Director, Center for Quality Measurement and Reporting Presented to the HSCRC Performance
More informationHealthcare Reform & Value Based Purchasing: Are You Ready?
Healthcare Reform & Value Based Purchasing: Are You Ready? Premier, Inc Jan Englert, Director-QUEST Poudre Valley Health System Sonja Wulff, VP Center for Performance Excellence Federal Register Statement:
More informationHOSPITAL VALUE- BASED PURCHASING. Initial Results Show Modest Effects on Medicare Payments and No Apparent Change in Quality-of- Care Trends
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees October 2015 HOSPITAL VALUE- BASED PURCHASING Initial Results Show Modest Effects on Medicare Payments and No Apparent
More informationInternational Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures
I-Acute Myocardial Infarction (I-AMI) I-AMI-1 Aspirin at Arrival Aspirin received within 24 hours of arrival to the hospital for patients having an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). I-AMI-2 Aspirin Prescribed
More informationHow We Rate Hospitals
How We Rate Hospitals June 2014 1. Overview....................................................................... 2 2. Patient Outcomes 2.1 Avoiding infections.......................................................
More informationHospital Quality Initiative Overview CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES December 2005
Hospital Quality Initiative Overview CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES December 2005 Background Quality health care is a high priority for the Bush administration, the Department of Health and Human
More informationQuality Scorecard overall heart attack care overall heart failure overall pneumonia care overall surgical infection rate patient safety survival
Quality Scorecard s are required to report quality statistics to the s for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health (DOH). This information is made available at www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov
More informationSpecialty Excellence Award and America s 100 Best Hospitals for Specialty Care 2013-2014 Methodology Contents
Specialty Excellence Award and America s 100 Best Hospitals for Specialty Care 2013-2014 Methodology Contents Introduction... 2 Specialty Excellence Award Determination... 3 America s 100 Best Hospitals
More informationNational Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual
National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual Release Notes Version: 5.0 Release Notes Completed: March 9, 2015 Guidelines for Using Release Notes The Release Notes Version
More informationHospital Compare Downloadable Database Data Dictionary
System Requirements Specification Hospital Compare Downloadable Database Data Dictionary Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services https://data.medicare.gov/data/hospital-compare of Contents Introduction...
More informationFY 2016 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Issues May 21, 2015
FY 2016 Inpatient PPS Proposed Rule Quality Issues May 21, 2015 AAMC Staff: Scott Wetzel, swetzel@aamc.org Mary Wheatley, mwheatley@aamc.org Agenda Summary of key quality and payment IPPS provisions Cross-cutting
More informationEvidence Based Practice to. Value Based Purchasing. Barb Rogness BSN MS Building Bridges May 2013
Evidence Based Practice to Value Based Purchasing Barb Rogness BSN MS Building Bridges May 2013 Why this topic? Value based Purchasing is here and not going away. It will grow by leaps and bounds. The
More informationMedical Assistance EHR Incentive Program MAPIR Application. 2014 EH Stage 2 Screen Shots
Medical Assistance HIT Initiative Medical Assistance EHR Provider Incentive Program Eligible Hospital Provider Manual v.3.1 Medical Assistance EHR Incentive Program MAPIR Application 2014 EH Stage 2 Screen
More informationPatient Care Services Quality Report Evaluation of 2013 Outcomes August 2014
Patient Care Services Quality Report Evaluation of 2013 Outcomes August 2014 Submitted by, Carol A Dwyer, MSN, MM, RN, CENP Vice President, Patient Care Services Chief Nursing Officer 1 Index INTRODUCTION...3
More informationThe Flex Program MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Office of Rural Health Policy 2012 Rural Health Information Technology Network Development Grantee Meeting The Flex Program MEDICARE BENEFICIARY QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Paul Moore, DPh Senior Health
More informationQuality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov
Quality Star Ratings on Medicare.gov August 2015 2015 CMS National Training Program Workshop August 10 11 St. Louis, MO Quality Star Ratings Part of a larger effort at DHHS to transform our health care
More informationFlorida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis
Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis Data Overview for the Commission on Healthcare and Hospital Funding May 20, 2015 1 Office of Data Collection and Quality Assurance Collection of
More informationHEDIS/CAHPS 101. August 13, 2012 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup
HEDIS/CAHPS 101 Minnesota Measurement and Reporting Workgroup Objectives Provide introduction to NCQA Identify HEDIS/CAHPS basics Discuss various components related to HEDIS/CAHPS usage, including State
More informationStroke/VTE Quality Measure Build for Meaningful Use Stage 1
Stroke/VTE Quality Measure Build for Meaningful Use Stage 1 Presented by Susan Haviland, BSN RN Senior Consult, Santa Rosa Consulting Meaningful Use Quality Measures Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
More informationIowa Healthcare Collaborative (IHC) Iowa Report. CY2012 Healthcare-associated Infection (HAI) Data Collection and Reporting Guide
Iowa Healthcare Collaborative () Iowa Report Healthcare-associated Infection (HAI) Data Collection and Reporting Guide Revision Date: January 17, 2013 This document is intended to be a HAI data collection
More informationAdvancing Risk Capability in 2015: MACRA and 2016 Medicare Proposed Rule. May 26, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. EST
Advancing Risk Capability in 2015: MACRA and 2016 Medicare Proposed Rule May 26, 2015 // 12:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. EST Center For Industry Transformation The DHG Healthcare Center for Industry Transformation
More informationReview of the Stroke and VTE Measure Sets
Review of the Stroke and VTE Measure Sets Vicky Agramonte, RN, MSN IPRO Quality Data Reporting and Improvement Project Presentation to NYS Hospitals January 29, 2013 The QIO Program CMS Leads a national
More informationValue Based Care and Healthcare Reform
Value Based Care and Healthcare Reform Dimensions in Cardiac Care November, 2014 Jacqueline Matthews, RN, MS Senior Director, Quality Reporting & Reform Quality and Patient Safety Institute Cleveland Clinic
More informationStroke: Major Public Health Burden. Stroke: Major Public Health Burden. Stroke: Major Public Health Burden 5/21/2012
Faculty Prevention Sharon Ewer, RN, BSN, CNRN Stroke Program Coordinator Baptist Health Montgomery, Alabama Satellite Conference and Live Webcast Monday, May 21, 2012 2:00 4:00 p.m. Central Time Produced
More informationVALUE-BASED PURCHASING-CHANGES IN 2014 OPTIMIZING HEALTHCARE
VALUE-BASED PURCHASING-CHANGES IN 2014 OPTIMIZING HEALTHCARE FEBRUARY 26, 2014 Donna Jennings, RRT, MBA, CPHQ, CPHRM Senior Consultant Nashville, TN HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES Oliver Wyman CHI-HLC11401-003
More informationNational Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual
National Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Measures Specifications Manual Release Notes Version: 4.2 Release Notes Completed: June 25, 2012 Guidelines for Using Release Notes Release Notes 4.2 provide
More informationInpatient Quality Reporting Program
2015 IPPS Final Rule Webinar AM Questions and Answers Transcript Moderator: Deb Price, PhD, MEd, MSPH Educational Coordinator, Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program Speakers: Barbara Choo, RN, FNP,
More informationUnderstanding the Implications of Medicare s Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier
Understanding the Implications of Medicare s Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier D. Louis Glaser Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 525 W. Monroe Chicago, Illinois Agenda Introduction PQRS v. VBPM VBPM Adjustments
More informationCreating a Hybrid Database by Adding a POA Modifier and Numerical Laboratory Results to Administrative Claims Data
Creating a Hybrid Database by Adding a POA Modifier and Numerical Laboratory Results to Administrative Claims Data Michael Pine, M.D., M.B.A. Michael Pine and Associates, Inc. mpine@consultmpa.com Overview
More informationOCM and SCIP Measure Data Submission Process: How to Submit Data through the QualityNet Secure Portal
OCM and SCIP Measure Data Submission Process: How to Submit Data through the QualityNet Secure Portal Henrietta Hight, BA, BSN, RN, CCM, CDMS, CPHQ PCHQR Support Coordinator Inpatient Value, Incentives,
More informationValue Based Purchasing: Combining Cost and Quality
Value Based Purchasing: Combining Cost and Quality Michael T. Rapp, MD, JD, FACEP Director, Quality Measurement and Health Assessment Group Office of Clinical Standards & Quality Centers for Medicare &
More informationCMS Quality Improvement Activities Future of Healthcare in the Insular Areas A Leaders Summit September 29 30, 2008
CMS Quality Improvement Activities Future of Healthcare in the Insular Areas A Leaders Summit September 29 30, 2008 Mary Rydell CMS Region IX Pacific Area Representative San Francisco, Honolulu 1 Topics
More informationMeaningful Use: Moving to Stage 2 and the Leadership Required to Achieve Success
Meaningful Use: Moving to Stage 2 and the Leadership Required to Achieve Success Liz Johnson, MS, FCHIME, FHIMSS, CPHIMS, RN-BC VP of Applied Clinical Informatics, Chief Clinical Informaticist Tenet Healthcare
More information2013 MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE QUALITY AND RESOURCE USE REPORT
2013 MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE QUALITY AND RESOURCE USE REPORT Sample Medical Practice Last Four Digits of Your Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN): 1530 ABOUT THIS REPORT FROM MEDICARE WHAT This Quality
More informationHospital Performance Differences by Ownership
100 TOP HOSPITALS RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS This paper evaluates whether hospital ownership is associated with differing levels of performance on Truven Health 100 Top Hospitals balanced scorecard measures.
More informationWest Virginia Electronic Health Records (EHR) Provider Incentive Program (PIP) For Eligible Hospitals Meaningful Use Attestation Guide
West Virginia Electronic Health Record Provider Incentive Program MEANINGFUL USE - Hospital West Virginia Electronic Health Records (EHR) Provider Incentive Program (PIP) For Eligible Hospitals Guide Date
More informationPreventing Readmissions
Emerging Topics in Healthcare Reform Preventing Readmissions Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Preventing Readmissions The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) contains several provisions intended
More informationX-Plain Hip Replacement Surgery - Preventing Post Op Complications Reference Summary
X-Plain Hip Replacement Surgery - Preventing Post Op Complications Reference Summary Introduction Severe arthritis in the hip can lead to severe pain and inability to walk. To relieve the pain and improve
More information2013 ACO Quality Measures
ACO 1-7 Patient Satisfaction Survey Consumer Assessment of HealthCare Providers Survey (CAHPS) 1. Getting Timely Care, Appointments, Information 2. How well Your Providers Communicate 3. Patient Rating
More informationAccountable Care Organization
Accountable Care Organization April 13, 2011 The Indianapolis Association of Health Underwriters Drivers of Payment Reform Increased attention to regional variation in costs and quality Payment for care
More informationFLORIDA S TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVES
FLORIDA S TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVES Lisa Rawlins, Bureau Chief, Florida Center for Health Information and Policy Analysis, Florida s Agency for Health Care Administration RawlinsL@ahca.myflorida.com Florida
More informationemeasures Transitions
WHITE PAPER 1010100010101010101010101001000011001 10101000101101101000100000101010010000101011001001010110 0101000101101010001010101010101010100100001010 0101000101101010001011011010001000001010100100
More informationThe Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms. Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey
The Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms Scoring Details for Sections 2 9 of the 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Table of Contents 2016 Leapfrog Hospital Survey Scoring Algorithms... 3 Section 2:
More informationMar. 31, 2011 (202) 690-6145. Improving Quality of Care for Medicare Patients: Accountable Care Organizations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Room 352-G 200 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20201 Office of Media Affairs MEDICARE FACT SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
More informationJune 22, 2012. Dear Administrator Tavenner:
Submitted Electronically Marilyn Tavenner Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Department of Health and Human Services Room 445-G Hubert H. Humphrey Building 200 Independence Avenue
More informationCurrent Medicare Fee-for-Service Pay-for-Performance Initiatives for Hospital and Physician Services. July 13, 2015
Current Medicare Fee-for-Service Pay-for-Performance Initiatives for Hospital and Physician Services July 13, 2015 Broad Overview of Payment Policy Direction Current State Future State Current mandatory
More informationCARDIA 288 MONTH FOLLOW-UP SUPPLEMENTAL FORM (FORM B) HOSPITALIZATION CASE #: INTERVIEWER ID FY288BIVID2. Page 1 of 6 FY288BH4CN
HOSPITALIZATION CASE #: 2 8 8 0 H FY288BH4CN Has the participant indicated any of the following reasons for being admitted overnight for this case? 1. Suspected or confirmed problems with the heart, circulation,
More informationPYA. PYALeadership Briefing. Beyond Tactics: Building a Value-Based Culture
PYA PYALeadership Briefing Beyond Tactics: Building a Value-Based Culture May 2012 Beyond Tactics: Building a Value-Based Culture Perhaps because CMS launched the Hospital Compare website over five years
More informationCognos Web-based Analytic Tool Overview
Cognos Web-based Analytic Tool Overview Market, Quality and Physician Data Analysis with Drill-thru Feature Mari Tietze, PhD, RN-BC Director, Nursing Research and Informatics DFWHC ERF 2009 1 UB-04 Source
More informationValue-Based Purchasing An Opportunity for Clinical Nurse Leaders
Value-Based Purchasing An Opportunity for Clinical Nurse Leaders Marjorie S. Wiggins, DNP, MBA, RN, FAAN, NEA-BC Senior Vice President, Patient Care Services/Chief Nursing Officer AACN-CNL Summit, Long
More informationHow To Improve A Hospital'S Performance
FY 16 MHAC Methodology Redesign HSCRC Performance Measurement Work Group February 20, 2014 1 Presentation Contents Background: Reason to change, guiding principles, timing Measurement Methodology Payment
More informationSeptember 2013. Hospital Performance Measures Instruction Manual
September 2013 Hospital Performance Measures Instruction Manual Version 7.0 Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Division of Quality Assurance Revised: 09/03/2013 1 Contents Background... 4 General Data Reporting
More informationFrom the Commissioner
A Message From the Commissioner Welcome to the New Jersey 2011 Hospital Performance Report, the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services eighth annual report on the quality of care in New Jersey
More informationCritical Access Hospitals. Objectives
MeaningfulUse for Critical Access Hospitals Paul Kleeberg, MD, FAAFP, FHIMSS President, The Itinerant CMIO, LLC TASC HIT WEBINAR SERIES Tuesday, April 13, 2010 Objectives Understand the incentives and
More information2016 Hospital National Patient Safety Goals
2016 Hospital The purpose of the is to improve patient safety. The goals focus on problems in Improve staff communication NPSG.02.03.01 Get important test results to the right staff person on time. Use
More informationInterventional Cardiology Peripheral Interventions Rhythm Management
FY2016 Hospital Inpatient Rule (IPPS) Interventional Cardiology Peripheral Interventions Rhythm Management On April 17, 2015 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Hospital Inpatient
More informationMedicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Summary. http://www.cms.gov/ehrincentiveprograms/
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Meaningful Use Stage 1 Requirements Summary 2010 What are the Requirements of Stage 1 Meaningful Use? Basic Overview of Stage 1 Meaningful Use: Reporting period
More informationMethodological Issues in Comparing Hospital Performance: Measures, Risk Adjustment, and Public Reporting
Methodological Issues in Comparing Hospital Performance: Measures, Risk Adjustment, and Public Reporting Harlan M. Krumholz, MD Yale University School of Medicine July 31, 2015 2015 National Forum on Pay
More informationSee page 331 of HEDIS 2013 Tech Specs Vol 2. HEDIS specs apply to plans. RARE applies to hospitals. Plan All-Cause Readmissions (PCR) *++
Hospitalizations Inpatient Utilization General Hospital/Acute Care (IPU) * This measure summarizes utilization of acute inpatient care and services in the following categories: Total inpatient. Medicine.
More informationNorman Regional Health System Case Study
Case Study High-Performing Health Care Organization April 2010 Norman Regional Health System: A City-Owned Public Trust Dedicated to Improving Performance Sha r o n Si l o w-ca r r o l l, M.B.A., M.S.W.
More informationHAI LEADERSHIP PARTNERING FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE
HAI LEADERSHIP PARTNERING FOR ACCOUNTABLE CARE Cepheid s Government Affairs Department Advocating for Patient Access to Molecular Diagnostics in the Era of Healthcare Reform A TEAM APPROACH Legislative
More informationRef: Hospital Quality Star Ratings on Hospital Compare Methodology of Overall Hospital Quality Star Ratings
August 17, 2015 Mr. Andrew M. Slavitt Acting Administrator Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 445-G 200 Independence
More informationHITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations
HITECH Act Update: An Overview of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Regulations The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) was enacted as part of
More information