THE INCREASING RISK OF SANCTIONS FOR ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IN E-DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE
|
|
- Marian McDonald
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 White Paper Series February 2006 THE INCREASING RISK OF SANCTIONS FOR ORDINARY NEGLIGENCE IN E-DISCOVERY COMPLIANCE The law is continuously carving out and redefining the boundaries of electronic document preservation and production requirements. Because of the drastic consequences now being sought from and often granted by courts in electronic discovery, businesses and lawyers need to keep a watchful eye on this evolving landscape. Lately, the spotlight has been on a number of recent high profile decisions severely sanctioning litigants who were guilty of willful or grossly negligent e-discovery conduct. However, the law also has a trap for the unwary severe sanctions can also be assessed for mere ordinary negligence in complying with e-discovery obligations. In this environment, which looming e-discovery changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will make even more hostile, pre-litigation document retention planning and compliance with e-discovery obligations have never been more important. The Willfulness/Gross Negligence Standard In perhaps the most infamous e-discovery sanctions case to date, Coleman (Parent)Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.,1 CPH sued financial giant Morgan Stanley for fraud in connection with CPH's sale of stock, and sought access to Morgan Stanley's internal s. After learning that many relevant s were lost because Morgan Stanley had continued its policy of overwriting s (despite an SEC regulation requiring their retention), the court ordered Morgan Stanley to go to its backup tapes for relevant s. Morgan Stanley partially complied, but its internal team in charge of the project knowingly failed to search many hundreds of backup tapes and falsely certified the production as complete. Morgan Stanley then notified CPH and the court that there were thousands of additional responsive s and that the team was continuing to find additional 1 CPH (Parent) Holdings, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., 2005 WL (Fla. Cir. Ct., Mar. 1, 2005).
2 The Increasing Risk Of Sanctions Page 2 of 5 additional backup tapes and was still searching backup tapes for even more s just a month before trial. To make matters worse, Morgan Stanley's counsel misrepresented facts relating to when the team had found the backup tapes, and equivocated about the timeframe for completion of the searches. The court noted that there was no way to know if all potentially responsive backup tapes had been located, and that responsive s existed that were not produced. It therefore found that relevant evidence had been spoiled and sanctioned Morgan Stanley by providing a detailed factual account of its discovery failings to the jury an adverse inference instruction for spoliation of evidence. Such an adverse inference instruction requires that (1) the spoliator had a duty to preserve the evidence, (2) the spoliator had a "culpable state of mind," and (3) the destroyed evidence was relevant to the opponent's claims or defenses. Importantly, willful misconduct alone will be deemed sufficient to demonstrate the element of relevance. An adverse inference order, which allows the jury to infer that the spoliator destroyed evidence because it knew it was unfavorable, often cannot be overcome and forces an end to litigation. But things got even worse for Morgan Stanley. After the adverse inference order, the court learned that the company had intentionally hidden information about its discovery violations and had coached witnesses not to mention additional problems with the backup tapes. Further, the searches of backup tapes that had been found could not be performed in time for trial. The court catalogued the ample evidence of willful and grossly negligent misconduct, entered a default judgment against Morgan Stanley and deemed the majority of CPH's complaint established. The jury went on to award CPH over $604 million in compensatory damages and $850 million in punitive damages. Morgan Stanley provides an iconic example of the level of willful or grossly negligent conduct that will support a drastic sanctions award. On the other end of the scale, for courts utilizing the same willfulness/gross negligence standard, are decisions refusing to grant drastic sanctions in the absence of clearly intentional or grossly negligent misconduct. For example, Getty Properties Corp. v. Raceway Petroleum, Inc.2 involved responsibility over a gasoline spill which occurred on property owned by Getty and leased by Raceway. Getty sought access to alarm history reports which could show when gasoline tanks were overfilled, but Raceway did not begin creating such reports until three years after the spill occurred. Getty sought sanctions against Raceway, but the Getty court declined to sanction the mere failure to create data. The court denied sanctions, noting that the alarm reports had never been kept in the regular course of business 2 Getty Properties Corp. v. Raceway Petroleum, Inc., 2005 WL (D.N.J. Jun. 14, 2005).
3 The Increasing Risk Of Sanctions Page 3 of 5 business and there was no intentional deletion of documents sufficient to warrant sanctions. Another example of a refusal to grant severe sanctions absent a high level of misconduct is Advantacare Health Partners, LP v. Access IV,3 a case involving use of the plaintiff's trade secrets by former employees. After the plaintiff moved for a TRO against use of the trade secrets and requiring production of the defendant's computer records, the defendant used file deletion software to attempt to delete thousands of the plaintiff's files from his computer. However, subsequent examination revealed that the plaintiff's files remained on the computer's hard drive. The court refused to grant a default judgment as a sanction, on the grounds that such a draconian punishment was not warranted by the defendant's conduct. However, the court granted a lesser sanction, in the form of an evidentiary presumption that the defendant had copied all of the plaintiff's files. The Ordinary Negligence Standard It would be a mistake, however to focus too much attention on sanctions awards arising from willful or grossly negligent e-discovery misconduct. Many courts, including the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, do not set the bar of e- discovery misconduct as high and will award sanctions of comparable severity for merely negligent e-discovery noncompliance. The standard for the award of such sanctions was most prominently articulated in Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC.4 In that case, the defendant had taken steps to impose a "litigation hold" to ensure the retention of s and other documents relevant to the litigation. Despite these steps, its employees deleted potentially relevant s from their computers. In addition, the defendant failed to produce many potentially relevant s that had been retained, and delayed the production of the s that it did produce. The court held that the defendant had willfully destroyed potentially relevant s and deserved the sanction of an adverse spoliation inference an instruction to the jury that the lost s were presumably relevant and damaging to defendant's case which ultimately led to a $ 29.3 million jury verdict against the defendant. However, the Zubulake court also confirmed the rule, set forth in Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp.,5 that ordinary negligence is a sufficiently "culpable state of mind" to support an adverse inference. When destruction of evidence is merely negligent as opposed to willful, the relevance of the destroyed evidence is not presumed. Instead, its relevance must be proven by the party seeking sanctions. 3 Advantacare Health Partners, LP v. Access IV, 2004 WL (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2004). 4 Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). 5 Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2002).
4 The Increasing Risk Of Sanctions Page 4 of 5 The Zubulake ruling is consistent with other decisions from the Second Circuit. For instance, the court in Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Local 100, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Int'l Union,6 sanctioned the defendants by, among other things, entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Although the court found that the defendants had willfully failed to search for, preserve or produce electronic documents, it noted the Residential Funding rule that ordinary negligence in complying with e-discovery establishes the level of culpability needed to support an adverse inference sanction. The ordinary negligence standard has also been applied outside the Second Circuit to support the imposition of adverse inference instructions and other drastic sanctions. For example, in DaimlerChrysler Motors v. Bill Davis Racing, Inc.,7 the defendant's failure to preserve s stemmed from the fact that its computer system automatically deleted s unless steps were taken to retain them, and deleted s could not be recovered. The court observed that while the destruction of the s was not in bad faith, i.e., not willful, a sanction was still proper for what under the circumstances amounted to negligent failure to preserve the s. In this case, that negligence was comprised of the defendant's failure to suspend normal destruction policies in the face of litigation and the failure to make an adequate search of potentially relevant s prior to their deletion. In particular, the defendant failed to ask one of the central witnesses about relevant documents and failed to preserve internal s relating to the parties' disputed agreement. Although there was no deliberate deletion of s and no attempt to cover up failures to preserve evidence or comply with e-discovery obligations as in the Morgan Stanley case, it was clear that the defendant had made no effort to retain potentially relevant s. The court granted an adverse spoliation inference instruction that it could presume that the evidence that was destroyed would have been favorable to the plaintiff. Another application of the ordinary negligence standard came in Thompson v. U.S. Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev.,8 where the defendants failed to produce employee s despite specific requests for their production and a court ruling that they were discoverable. After a sanction in the form of an order barring any defense witness who had generated or received any responsive s, and well after the discovery cutoff, the defendants produced tens of thousands of s. This led to another round of sanctions, including an order barring the defendants from using any of the s at trial or to prepare witnesses. In this context, the court reiterated the rule of Residential Funding that 6 Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Local 100, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Int'l Union, 212 F.R.D. 178 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). 7 DaimlerChrysler Motors v. Bill Davis Racing, Inc., 2005 WL (E.D. Mich. Dec. 22, 2005). 8 Thompson v. U.S. Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev., 219 F.R.D. 93 (D. Md. 2003).
5 The Increasing Risk Of Sanctions Page 5 of 5 ordinary negligence, bad faith and gross negligence are each sufficient to justify sanctions. The lurking menace of crippling sanctions for the merely negligent failure to comply with e-discovery obligations will soon carry an even greater peril, because e- discovery obligations are about to get significantly more substantial and complex. Pending amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that are expected to be approved and go into effect on December 1, 2006 will require, among other things, the production of electronically stored information directly from electronic information and storage systems in response to an ordinary request for documents. Critically, parties and their counsel will also be required to engage in pre-discovery discussion of the parties' respective information and storage systems, the preservation of discoverable information and the form of production of that information. As these evolving standards show, the law will eventually catch up with advancements in technology. Businesses and their counsel should not be caught unprepared. Contacts: Dan P. Sedor mailto:dsedor@jmbm.com Dan P. Sedor is a partner at Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP in Los Angles and a founding member of its Discovery Technology Group. His practice focuses on litigation involving electronic discovery and data management across a broad spectrum of business disputes, including the prosecution and defense of complex contractual disputes, business torts, fraud claims, trade secret and unfair competition claims, and partnership and corporate disagreements and dissolutions. 2006, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP
E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK
E-DISCOVERY: BURDENSOME, EXPENSIVE, AND FRAUGHT WITH RISK If your company is involved in civil litigation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding preservation and production of electronic documents
More informationPretrial Practice Course Syllabus Spring, 2014 Meeting -- Tuesdays 1:30-3:20pm Room -- 432(C)
Pretrial Practice Course Syllabus Spring, 2014 Meeting -- Tuesdays 1:30-3:20pm Room -- 432(C) Professor: Rich Kelsey Telephone: (703) 993-8973 Email: rkelsey@gmu.edu Course Materials Material will be assigned
More informationElectronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production
Electronic Discovery: Litigation Holds, Data Preservation and Production April 27, 2010 Daniel Munsch, Assistant General Counsel John Lerchey, Coordinator for Incident Response 0 E-Discovery Rules Federal
More informationLAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE. COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES THOUGHTS ON THE NOTE TO PROPOSED RULE 37(e) April 25, 2014
LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES THOUGHTS ON THE NOTE TO PROPOSED RULE 37(e) April 25, 2014 Lawyers for Civil Justice ( LCJ ) respectfully submits the following
More informationSeptember Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE September Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationTen Tips for Responding to Litigation Hold Letters
Litigation Holds: Ten Tips in Ten Minutes Stephanie F. Stacy Baylor, Evnen, Curtiss, Grimit & Witt, LLP 1248 O Street, Suite 600 Lincoln, Nebraska 68508 sstacy@baylorevnen.com Introduction A litigation
More informationUNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE. 99 Park Avenue, 16 th Floor New York, New York 10016 www.devoredemarco.com
UNDERSTANDING E DISCOVERY A PRACTICAL GUIDE 1 What is ESI? Information that exists in a medium that can only be read through the use of computers Examples E-mail Word Documents Databases Spreadsheets Multimedia
More informationElements of a Good Document Retention Policy. Discovery Services WHITE PAPER
Elements of a Good Document Retention Policy Discovery Services WHITE PAPER Document retention especially the retention of electronic data has become a hot topic in the legal industry. In the wake of several
More informationHow To Protect A Company Or Law Firm From Being Sanctioned For Violating A Discovery Order
A SCARAB CONSULTING WHITEPAPER January, 2012 Third-party ediscovery Providers = Insulation Against Cold, Harsh Sanctions? Synopsis The risk of sanctions resulting from 1) corporations doing selfcollections
More informationBest Practices for Enforcing Legal Holds on E-Mail and Electronic Data through Proactive Archiving Sponsored by Symantec
WHITE PAPER: Best Practices for legal holds Confidence in a connected world. Best Practices for Enforcing Legal Holds on E-Mail and Electronic Data through Proactive Archiving Sponsored by Symantec Jennifer
More informationINTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES. William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006
INTERNET ISSUES: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS NEW E-DISCOVERY RULES William R. Denny Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP September 26, 2006 Agenda What is a Trade Secret? Tracking Down the Anonymous Blogger Strategies
More informationProposed Changes to Federal Rule 37(e)
Young Lawyers Preservation of Electronically Stored Information By Jennifer Ecklund and Janelle L. Davis Proposed Changes to Federal Rule 37(e) The proposed rule could go a long way toward providing certainty
More informationWhat Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents?
Document Retention and Destruction in Oregon What Happens When Litigation Starts? How Do You Get People Not To Generate the Bad Documents? Timothy W. Snider (503) 294-9557 twsnider@stoel.com Stoel Rives
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:13-cv-00046-CCE-LPA Document 24 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationE-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers
MARCH 7, 2007 E-Discovery: The New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure A Practical Approach for Employers By Tara Daub and Christopher Gegwich News of the recent amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
More informationPROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES
PROPOSED ELECTRONIC DATA DISCOVERY GUIDELINES FOR THE MARYLAND BUSINESS AND TECHONOLOGY CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM JUDGES What follows are some general, suggested guidelines for addressing different areas
More informationHow To Protect Your Electronic Information System From Being Destroyed
E-MAIL LINKS DATABASES SEARCH FIRMS MEMBER PROFILES FORUM VENDORS CALENDAR SEARCH My Dashboard My Messages (1) Firm Menu My Articles My Expert Witnesses My Links My Mediators / Arbiters My News / Updates
More informationediscovery Update February 2010
ediscovery Update February 2010 VEDDERPRICE ediscovery Update Chicago New York Washington, D.C. February 2010 Zubulake Revisited Preservation Obligations and Sanctions Standards Clarifi ed In Pension Committee
More informationThe Benefits of Records and Information Management (RIM) in Electronic Discovery
The Benefits of Records and Information Management (RIM) in Electronic Discovery Challenges The importance of records information management is often underestimated and misunderstood. The absence of solid
More informationBest Practices in Electronic Record Retention
A. Principles For Document Management Policies Arthur Anderson, LLD v. U.S., 544 U.S. 696 (2005) ( Document retention policies, which are created in part to keep certain information from getting into the
More informationBackup Tape E-Discovery
Shedding Light on New strategies for backing up data and the 2006 amendments to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have led to costly e-discovery nightmares for organizations. A few simple steps
More information2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review
2004 E-Discovery Developments: Year in Review Sean Foley, Esq., Legal Consultant Michele C.S. Lange, Esq., Staff Attorney, Legal Technologies January 20, 2005 Presenters Sean Foley, Esq., Legal Consultant
More informationLegal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery
Legal Arguments & Response Strategies for E-Discovery The tools to craft strategic discovery requests & mitigate the risks and burdens of production. Discussion Outline Part I Strategies for Requesting
More informationACADEMIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL ******************************************************************************
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: 8.D DATE: March 15, 2007 ****************************************************************************** SUBJECT: Electronic Records Discovery Electronic records management
More informationGeneral Items Of Thought
ESI PROTOCOLS & CASE LONG BUDGETS General Items Of Thought What s a GB =??? What Are Sources Of Stored Data? What s BYOD mean??? The Human Factor Is At Play! Litigation Hold Duty Arises When? Zubulake
More informationCOALSP 2013 E-Discovery Case Law Update. Drew Unthank Partner Wheeler Trigg O Donnell LLP
COALSP 2013 E-Discovery Case Law Update Drew Unthank Partner Wheeler Trigg O Donnell LLP Agenda Where have we come from? Where are we now? Where are we going? Antacids Where Have We Come From? Litigation
More informationNEWSLETTER FINEX NORTH AMERICA TO INDEMNIFY OR NOT TO INDEMNIFY: THAT WAS THE QUESTION BEFORE THE DELAWARE COURT
FINEX NORTH AMERICA NEWSLETTER May 2012 www.willis.com In this Newsletter we consider the expansive nature of indemnification under Delaware Law, potentially significant changes to the rules of ediscovery,
More informationCyber Tech & E-Commerce
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Cyber Tech & E-Commerce The Duty To Preserve Data Stored Temporarily In Ram: Is The Sky Really Falling? by J. Alexander Lawrence Morrison & Foerster New York, New York A commentary
More informationDiscovery Ethics Course Plan
The Ethics of Pre-Trial Discovery Discovery Ethics Course Plan I. Pre-Trial Discovery II. General Ethical Rules and Personal Mores Governing Discovery III. Ethical Considerations for Obtaining Informal
More informationIn-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum
125 In-House Solutions to the E-Discovery Conundrum Retta A. Miller Carl C. Butzer Jackson Walker L.L.P. April 21, 2007 www.pointmm.com I. OVERVIEW OF THE RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONICALLY- STORED INFORMATION
More informationThe Evolution of Electronic Discovery
CHAPTER 2 The Evolution of Electronic Discovery 2.1 Introduction... 2 1 2.2 The Sedona Principles... 2 2 2.3 The Zubulake Cases... 2 5 2.4 The Morgan Stanley Decisions... 2 8 2.5 The Amendments to the
More informationOutlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions
William Mitchell E-Discovery Symposium Outlaw v. Willow Oral Argument Motions for Sanctions Mary T. Novacheck, Esq. Partner Bowman and Brooke LLP Outlaw's Motion: Cost Shift Vendor Fees to Willow Prior
More informationMinimizing ediscovery risks. What organizations need to know in today s litigious and digital world.
What organizations need to know in today s litigious and digital world. The main objective for a corporation s law department is to mitigate risk throughout the company, while keeping costs under control.
More informationThe Need for Discovery Professionals. by David M. Shub, Esq. VP of Discovery Strategy, DiscoverReady LLC
by David M. Shub, Esq. VP of Discovery Strategy, DiscoverReady LLC 2007, DiscoverReady LLC July 2007 D iscovery, though an essential part of the legal process, has increasingly become the bane of existence
More informationMay 2015 Vol. 44, No. 5 Page 45. Articles Family Law Preservation of Social Media Evidence in a Family Law Context
May 2015 Vol. 44, No. 5 Page 45 Articles Family Law Preservation of Social Media Evidence in a Family Law Context by Kevin C. Massaro, Taylor P. Statfeld Family Law articles are sponsored by the CBA Family
More informationElectronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys
Electronic Discovery and the New Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: A Guide For In-House Counsel and Attorneys By Ronald S. Allen, Esq. As technology has evolved, the federal courts have
More informationThe Duty of Preservation
Session 6 ERM Case Law: The Annual MER Update of the Latest News, Trends, & Issues Hon. John M. Facciola United States District Court, District of Columbia Kenneth J. Withers, Esq. Deputy Executive Director,
More informationEthics and ediscovery
Ethics and ediscovery John Mansfield and Devon Newman January 6, 2012 1 2013, MansfieldLaw ediscovery basics We will cover: Preservation and spoliation Searching and producing documents Supervising lawyers
More informationTop 10 Things We Hate to Hear During an Internal Investigation
Top 10 Things We Hate to Hear During an Internal Investigation June 19, 2015 Thomas J. Kenny Partner Kutak Rock LLP thomas.kenny@kutakrock.com 1. After we heard about the Compliance Hotline Report, we
More informationAvoiding The Pitfalls Of Electronic Discovery
Reprinted By: Avoiding The Pitfalls Of Electronic Discovery by Matthew M. Neumeier, Esq. and Brian D. Hansen, Esq. Jenner & Block, LLC Chicago A commentary article reprinted from the November 2003 issue
More informationElectronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake
Electronic Discovery: Lessons from Zubulake Bruce J. Douglas Daniel J. Ballintine Presented November 29, 2006 to Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd. 1 Introduction What is a Zubulake, anyway, and how do
More informationAmendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP September 25, 2009 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Yours to
More informationELECTRONIC DISCOVERY AND THE DUTY TO PRESERVE ELECTRONIC DATA. Jeremy D. Wright Kator, Parks & Weiser, P.L.L.C. jwright@katorparks.
ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY AND THE DUTY TO PRESERVE ELECTRONIC DATA Jeremy D. Wright Kator, Parks & Weiser, P.L.L.C. jwright@katorparks.com 1 INTRODUCTION THE ELECTRONIC WORKPLACE VOLUME OF ELECTRONIC DATA CREW
More informationThe Importance of Appropriate Record Retention Policies
The Importance of Appropriate Record Retention Policies Copyright 2003 by Document Technologies, Inc. David Shub, Discovery and Records Management Director 1 With HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, and various high-profile
More informationCross-border Challenges for e-discovery
123 Cross-border Challenges for e-discovery Seth Berman* Cross-border electronic discovery (or disclosure as it s called in the UK context) is becoming increasingly common and increasingly fraught with
More informationElectronic documents are no less subject to disclosure than. Electronic Discovery In Arbitration: Privilege Issues and Spoliation of Evidence
A RBITRATION Electronic Discovery In Arbitration: Privilege Issues and Spoliation of Evidence By Irene C. Warshauer Irene C. Warshauer is Of Counsel to Fried & Epstein LLP in New York City and an active
More informationE-Discovery and ESI Recent Decisions and Best Practices
E-Discovery and ESI Recent Decisions and Best Practices Ben Feldman bfeldman@foxrothschild.com 412.391.2428 2014 Fox Rothschild ESI Humor ESI Humor Begs the Question What is ESI? For the purpose of the
More informationNLRB: NxGen Case Management, E-Government and E-Discovery
NLRB: NxGen Case Management, By: James G. Paulsen, Assistant General Counsel, OGC and Bryan Burnett, Chief Information Officer, OCIO, National Labor Relations Board A. Next Generation (NxGen) Case Management
More informationThe Legal Advantages of Retaining Information
WHITE PAPER: CUSTOMIZE WHITE PAPER: BEST PRACTICES FOR ARCHIVING Confidence in a connected world. Best Practices for Defining and Establishing Effective Archive Retention Policies Sponsored by Symantec
More informationKeep your electronic evidence from being flushed down the toilet. Once rare, spoliation cases are growing in number.
An e-discovery guide to spoliation motions Keep your electronic evidence from being flushed down the toilet. Once rare, spoliation cases are growing in number. By Nick Brestoff I have to begin by saying
More informationBest Practices: Litigation Holds and Resolving Spoliation Motions
Best Practices: Litigation Holds and Resolving Spoliation Motions The following Middle Market* insight first appeared in the April 2015 issue of For the Defense magazine, the official publication of DRI,
More informationLegal Developments in ediscovery: Implications for Security Management
Legal Developments in ediscovery: Implications for Security Management Richard S. Swart and Robert F. Erbacher Utah State University richard.swart@usu.edu Robert.Erbacher@usu.edu Abstract This paper defines
More informationVictor Stanley: A Valuable Reference Tool Involving Harsh Sanctions for Intentional Spoliation
Victor Stanley: A Valuable Reference Tool Involving Harsh Sanctions for Intentional Spoliation By Candice McPhillips and Katherine Ruffing Introduction A recent must read opinion in the case of Victor
More informationElectronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments
Electronic Discovery: Understanding Preservation Obligations, the Potential for Cost-Shifting, and Current Developments Electronic Discovery - What s All The Talk About? November 2004 1313 North Market
More informationRecord Retention, ediscovery, Spoliation: Issues for In-House Counsel
Record Retention, ediscovery, Spoliation: Issues for In-House Counsel CCCA Webinar April 1, 2015 Presenters: Gavin Tighe, Partner (Certified Specialist in Litigation) Stephen Thiele, Partner, Director
More informationE-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI):
E-Discovery and Electronically Stored Information (ESI): How Can It Help or Hinder a Case? Rosevelie Márquez Morales Harris Beach PLLC New York, NY Rosevelie Márquez Morales is a partner at Harris Beach
More informationLEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES
LEGAL HOLD OBLIGATIONS FOR DISTRICT EMPLOYEES INSERT YOUR NAME HERE Place logo or logotype here, Otherwise delete this text box. AGENDA.. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure What is a legal hold? What are
More informationLAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE. COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES
LAWYERS FOR CIVIL JUSTICE COMMENT to the ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON CIVIL RULES AT THE FINISH LINE: THE FINAL MODIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO BRING THE COMMITTEE S WORK TO FRUITION AND ENSURE MEANINGFUL RESULTS
More informationA PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
A PRIMER ON THE NEW ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY PROVISIONS IN THE ALABAMA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Effective February 1, 2010, the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to provide for and accommodate
More informationHow To Write A Hit Report On A Lawsuit Against A Company
Everything You Wanted to Know About ESI and E-Discovery but Were Afraid to Ask Jason M. Pistacchio Presented By: Gregory S. Johnson Attorney Attorney/Legal Technologist Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP Paine
More informationE-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011
E-DISCOVERY & PRESERVATION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE Ana Maria Martinez April 14, 2011 This presentation does not present the views of the U.S. Department of Justice. This presentation is not legal advice.
More informationFlorida E-Discovery 2013
Florida E-Discovery 2013 Christopher.Hopkins @Akerman.com Palm Beach Bar Association Employment Law Committee Florida E-Discovery 2013 Download This PPT: InternetLawCommentary.com Palm Beach Bar Association
More informationPlaintiffs, Defendants. x
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK usdc sdn( X DOCUMENT DMAC LLC and FOURMEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., ELF C\ OY 3 Plaintiffs, DATEr -against- CITY OF PEEKSKILL, CITY OF PEEKSKILL MAYOR
More informationKT Designs, LLC Litigation Graphics and Information Design www.kt-designs.org
KT Designs, LLC Litigation Graphics and Information Design www.kt-designs.org Electronic Discovery: The Implications for Trial and Matter Resolution A KT Designs, LLC White Paper Author: Kristin Thomas,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15-1328 NEAL D. SECREASE, JR., v. Plaintiff-Appellant, THE WESTERN & SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal
More informationESI Preservation in Employment Litigation: Counsel s Guide to New FRCP ediscovery Amendments
ESI Preservation in Employment Litigation: Counsel s Guide to New FRCP ediscovery Amendments FEATURED FACULTY: Patricia E. Antezana, Counsel, Reed Smith LLP PAntezana@ReedSmith.com Steven C. Bennett, Partner,
More informationAmendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. electronically stored information. 6 Differences from Paper Documents
Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Electronic Discovery effective Dec. 1, 2006 Copyright David A. Devine GROH EGGERS, LLC Rules amended: 16, 26, 33, 34, 37 & 45 Sources of information: Rules
More informationYou ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit
You ve Been Sued, Now What? A Roadmap Through An Employment Lawsuit California employers facing their first employment lawsuit can be in for a rude awakening. Such lawsuits are a harsh introduction to
More informationDISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,
More informationIn a recent Southern District of California decision, the court sent a
The Qualcomm Decision: Ethics In Electronic Discovery VICTORIA E. BRIEANT AND DAMON COLANGELO A recent decision reinforces the importance of a comprehensive electronic document management plan. In a recent
More informationE-Discovery Best Practices
José Ramón González-Magaz jrgonzalez@steptoe.com E-Discovery Best Practices www.steptoe.com November 10, 2010 Importance of E-Discovery 92% of all data is ESI. Source: Berkeley Study. 97 billion e-mails
More informationUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER ) NOE RODRIGUEZ, ) Complainant, ) 8 U.S.C. 1324b Proceeding ) v. ) OCAHO Case
More informationAppliedDiscovery. WhitePaper. RetentionPolicy
Applied AppliedDiscovery Discovery White WhitePaper Paper Elements ElementsofofaaGood GoodDocument Document Retention RetentionPolicy Policy ByBy Courtney Courtney Ingraffi Ingraffi a Barton, a Barton,
More informationCOURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Fall 2014
COURSE DESCRIPTION AND SYLLABUS LITIGATING IN THE DIGITAL AGE: ELECTRONIC CASE MANAGEMENT (994-001) Professors:Mark Austrian Christopher Racich Fall 2014 Introduction The ubiquitous use of computers, the
More informationDISCOVER E-DISCOVERY BEFORE IT DISCOVERS YOU. By Christine P. Tabbert 1 Fasken Martineau
DISCOVER E-DISCOVERY BEFORE IT DISCOVERS YOU By Christine P. Tabbert 1 Fasken Martineau The electronic age of communication has brought with it a number of unique challenges for litigation counsel and
More informationDefensive Strategies in False Marking Suits After Stauffer and Pequignot
Defensive Strategies in False Marking Suits After Stauffer and Pequignot Contributed by Angie M. Hankins, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP Many companies inadvertently mark their products with expired patents.
More informationNavigating in the Brave New World of E-Discovery: Ethics, Sanctions and Spoliation
NAVIGATING THE NEW WORLD OF E-DISCOVERY Navigating in the Brave New World of E-Discovery: Ethics, Sanctions and Spoliation Allison O. Van Laningham I. INTRODUCTION E-discovery is a fact of life in nearly
More informationElectronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010
Electronic Discovery How can I be prepared? September 2010 Presented by Brian Wilkinson, Director of ediscovery & Computer Forensics brian.wilkinson@us.pwc.com 410-659-3473 Table of Contents Page 1 Electronic
More informationIMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY
IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE DOCUMENT RETENTION POLICY EDWARD E. SHARKEY 4641 MONTGOMERY AVENUE SUITE 500 BETHESDA, MD 20814 (301) 657-8184 ESHARKEY@SHARKEYLAW.COM WWW.SHARKEYLAW.COM CONTENTS The Risks...
More informationHow to Avoid The Biggest Electronic Evidence Mistakes. Ken Jones Senior Technology Architect Pileum Corporation
How to Avoid The Biggest Electronic Evidence Mistakes Ken Jones Senior Technology Architect Pileum Corporation Why is Proper Handling of Electronic Data Important? Most of the evidence in your case isn
More informationNovember/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT. rofessionalism. Ethics Issues. and. Today s. Technology. www.innsofcourt.
November/December 2010 THE MAGAZINE OF THE AMERICAN INNS OF COURT rofessionalism and Ethics Issues in Today s Technology www.innsofcourt.org Transparency in E-Discovery: No Longer a Novel Approach By Michael
More informationREINHART. Labor & Employment E-News E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS:
REINHART E-NEWSLETTER ATTORNEYS: ROBERT K. SHOLL, CHAIR JEFFREY P. CLARK JOHN H. ZAWADSKY LYNN M. STATHAS DAVID J. SISSON CHRISTOPHER P. BANASZAK ROBERT J. MUTEN DARYLL J. NEUSER SUSAN B. WOODS JENNIFER
More informationData Preservation Duties and Protocols
Data Preservation Duties and Protocols November 2008 HOU:2858612.3 Discussion Outline I. The Differences Between Electronic and Paper Discovery II. The Parameters of Electronic Discovery III. Rule 37(e)
More informationSpoliation of Evidence. Prepared for:
Spoliation of Evidence Prepared for: Spoliation Nationwide anti-spoliation trend Cases can be thrown out of court Insurers can be denied subrogation claims An insured who destroys evidence of a claim can
More informationStrategies for Implementing an Effective and Defensible Legal Hold Workflow
Strategies for Implementing an Effective and Defensible Legal Hold Workflow Who should read this paper Corporate Counsel, IT/Legal Liaisons, and Messaging Administrators involved in the preservation of
More informationCommonsense Electronic Discovery Planning: How to Help Your Client Meet Its Electronic Production Obligations
Commonsense Electronic Discovery Planning: How to Help Your Client Meet Its Electronic Production Obligations By Elleanor H. Chin and Scott E. Warnick Reprinted with permission from The Oregon State Bar
More informationE-DISCOVERY AND RECORDS RETENTION PROGRAMS: What Healthcare Administrators Need to Know
E-DISCOVERY AND RECORDS RETENTION PROGRAMS: What Healthcare Administrators Need to Know Christopher A. Myers Holland & Knight LLP Progressive Healthcare Conferences December 19, 2007 The future ain't what
More informationargument, VACATES the hearing, and hereby rules as follows. BACKGROUND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DAVID MOORE, v. Plaintiff, GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., Defendant. / No. C 0-00 SI ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT S
More informationElectronic Discovery
Electronic Discovery L. Amy Blum, Esq. UCLA University of California, Los Angeles 1 Topics Not Covered Best practices for E-mail E use and retention in the ordinary course of business Records Disposition
More information(Previously published in The Legal Intelligencer, November 8, 2011) New Cost Guidelines for E-Discovery by Peter Vaira
(Previously published in The Legal Intelligencer, November 8, 2011) New Cost Guidelines for E-Discovery by Peter Vaira In a recent case in the Eastern District, Judge Legrome Davis upheld court costs of
More informationREALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY
REALITY BYTES: A NEW ERA OF ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY Steven M. Gruskin Carl J. Pellegrini Sughrue Mion, PLLC 2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20037 www.sughrue.com On December 1, 2006, the Federal
More informationBad Faith: Choice of Law Matters
Bad Faith: Choice of Law Matters Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge Insurance and Reinsurance Review - September 2010 Marc S. Voses Choice of law issues cannot be overlooked in insurance bad faith litigation,
More informationCMA Shipping 2015. Ethics and E-Discovery in Shipping Disputes
CMA Shipping 2015 Ethics and E-Discovery in Shipping Disputes March 25, 2015 Vincent J. Foley, Holland & Knight LLP (212) 513-3357 vincent.foley@hklaw.com CMA Shipping 2015 Ethics and E-Discovery for Shipping
More informationWHAT DOES E-DISCOVERY HAVE TO DO WITH RECORDS RETENTION & COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS?
WHAT DOES E-DISCOVERY HAVE TO DO WITH RECORDS RETENTION & COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS? - Martin J. Jaron, Jr., Partner - Suzanne Foster, Associate HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP & - Glenn Martin, Chief Internal Audit &
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00741-GMN-LRL Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-cv-00-GMN-LRL Document 0 Filed 0//0 Page of 0 Michael J. McCue (NV Bar No. 0 Nikkya G. Williams (NV Bar No. Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys for Defendants Jan Klerks and Stichting Wolkenkrabbers
More informationFive Rules for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information
Five Rules for Discovery of Electronically Stored Information Eastern North Carolina Inn of Court Spring Meeting New Bern, NC May 17, 2012 M ARK SCRUGGS C LAIMS COUNSEL L AWYERS MUTUAL 5020 Weston Parkway,
More informationEmerging Topics for E-Discovery. October 22, 2014
Emerging Topics for E-Discovery October 22, 2014 ACEDS Membership Benefits Training, Resources and Networking for the E-Discovery Community! Exclusive News and Analysis! Weekly Web Seminars! Podcasts!
More informationE-DISCOVERY IN THE US
E-DISCOVERY IN THE US A PRIMER Changing legal requirements and growing volumes of electronically stored information have made the discovery process more daunting and costly than ever before. This article
More informationSupreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions. (a) Discovery Methods.
Supreme Court Rule 201. General Discovery Provisions (a) Discovery Methods. Information is obtainable as provided in these rules through any of the following discovery methods: depositions upon oral examination
More informationE-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions
E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions 11 E-Discovery in Employment Litigation: Making Practical, Yet Defensible Decisions Introduction Much has been said about
More information