CHAPTER 13 THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN CAUGHT UP IN THE DIVORCE / SEPARATION OF THEIR PARENTS
|
|
- Kelley Goodman
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHAPTER 13 THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN CAUGHT UP IN THE DIVORCE / SEPARATION OF THEIR PARENTS 13.1 Introduction This Chapter focuses on the care and protection of children who are, or who have been, caught up in the conflict surrounding the divorce or separation of their parents, as a category of children in need of special protection. 1 As these children do have parents who sometimes do go to extreme measures to maintain a relationship with a child, this is one area where the Commission feel a little effort can go a long way to diffuse tension in the family home and improve the well-being of the children involved Improving outcomes for children Hearing children s voices Section 6(4) of the Divorce Act 2 empowers a court to appoint a legal practitioner to represent a child at divorce proceedings and to order the parties or one of them to pay the costs of such representation. The Commission stated that it would like to see this provision being used more often. The Commission also recommended that section 6 of the Divorce Act be amended to give a court the authority to appoint an interested third party, such as a member of the child's (extended) family, to support a child experiencing difficulties during parental separation or divorce in a manner determined by the court. Such support can involve a person being allocated temporary parental rights and responsibilities in respect of the child concerned. 3 While it is one of the key functions of the Family Advocate to canvass and ascertain the genuine wishes of the child and to communicate these to the court, the Mediation in The White Paper for Social Welfare (p.41, para 38 and 39) identifies children of divorced and divorcing parents as a vulnerable group that require special attention. 70 of Par p. 650 of the discussion paper.
2 193 Certain Divorce Matters Act 4 does not require the Family Advocate or the Family Counselor to hear the views of the child. The Commission stated that a simple amendment to the regulations to the Act to provide for the canvassing and recording of the child s views, where appropriate and if the child so wishes, would go a long way towards solving this problem. However, special care must be taken to ensure that children are not forced to choose between their parents. 5 The respondents who commented on this section supported the Commission s recommendations. Some of the respondents also made additional recommendations. Responding to the Commission s recommendation that the court should be empowered to appoint an interested third party, such as a member of the child's (extended) family, to support a child experiencing difficulties during parental separation or divorce, the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope recommended that the appointment of an interested third party should not be restricted to family members, but should include other persons such as psychologists. The Children s Rights Project and Local Government Project (Community Law Centre, UWC) supported the latter recommendation and added that the third party must be chosen with careful consideration and must be someone to whom the child is close. Such a person should also be made aware of the functions and duties of the staff members in both the Department of Social Development and the children s court, so that should a situation arise which might merit the intervention of a social worker or the children s court, such person would know whom to approach. The Commission agrees that the proposed interested third party to support a child experiencing difficulties during parental separation or divorce should not be restricted to family members. However, the appointment of professionals such as psychologists as interested third parties may have cost implications. An option would be to empower the court to order both or one of the parents to pay the fees of an interested third party appointed in his or her professional capacity. The Children s Rights Project and Local Government Project (Community Law Centre, UWC) pointed out that the courts, probably because of the expense that would result to the parties, seldom make use of section 6(4) of the Divorce Act which provides that the court may appoint a legal practitioner to represent a child at the proceedings of Par p.651 of the discussion paper.
3 194 Section 6(4) further stipulates that the court may order one or both of the parents to pay the costs of the legal representative appointed for the child. Thus, only children of the wealthy might be able to afford separate legal representation in divorce proceedings. The respondent proposed that in order to ensure that all children are given a voice in divorce proceedings or are represented by a legal representative; the State must appoint, at state expense, a legal representative. This, in the respondent s view, will be in accordance with the constitutional right of children in section 28(1)(h) of the Constitution, 6 and section 8A of the Child Care Act. 7 Furthermore, guidelines need to be drafted in order to inform the court as to when a child might need separate legal representation. The Commission has given due consideration to the issue of whether children in divorce proceedings should be provided with legal representation at state expense. In light of the comments made by the Children s Rights Project and Local Government Project, the Commission is of the view that the decision whether to appoint a legal representative for a child at divorce proceedings should not be based on whether both or one of the parents can afford to pay for such legal representation, but should be based on whether the court considers the appointment of a legal representative to be in the best interests of the child and whether the lack of legal representation would result in substantial injustice to the child. The Commission accordingly recommends that section 6(4) of the Divorce Act be amended to stipulate that the court may appoint a legal representative for a child at divorce proceedings and may order the parties or any one of them to pay the costs of the representation. However, if the court is satisfied that neither of the parties can afford to pay for such legal representation, the court must appoint a legal representative, at state expense, if substantial injustice would otherwise result. Furthermore, the Commission is of the view that Regulation 4A(1) to the Child Care Act provides adequate guidelines as to when separate legal representation might be needed for a child. The Commission has stated that the need for legal representation does not end with divorce. Changed circumstances may require changes in the original custody and access arrangements. Without someone to help give the children an opportunity to speak about their needs and voice their concerns, these sometimes dangerous situations are allowed to continue, and children are put at risk. Responding to this, the Children s Rights Project and Local Government Project (Community Law Centre, UWC) 6 7 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of of 1983.
4 195 submitted that although they agree with this statement, the Commission needs to make recommendations as to how children who find themselves in such situations can access a legal representative and the courts, and how the original custody or access arrangements can be varied. The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope welcomed the recommendation that section 6 of the Divorce Act be used more frequently. The respondent also supported the recommendation that the regulations should provide for the canvassing and recording of the child s views, where appropriate and if the child so wishes Reducing conflict In its attempt to find ways to reduce conflict between divorcing or separating parents, for the benefit of the children, the Commission recommended that the court should start with the assumption that, in the absence of issues regarding the child's physical, mental or emotional safety, the continued involvement of both parents in the child's life is the desired goal: this involvement ideally should be of the same quality post-separation as pre-separation. While not excluding the possibility of joint custody, the Commission stated that it is not equating the need of the child for the continued involvement of both his or her parents in his or her upbringing with the call for joint custody as the presumptive starting-point in divorce. 8 The use of the words custody, sole custody, guardianship, sole guardianship and access in the Divorce Act promote a potentially damaging sense of winners and losers. The use of more neutral language would help reduce conflict and let both parents focus on their responsibilities rather than their rights. The Commission therefore recommended that the terms custody and access be replaced with the terms care and contact respectively. Furthermore, that the Divorce Act, the Matrimonial Affairs Act, 9 and the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act be amended to add definitions of care and contact that reflect the meanings ascribed to those terms by the Commission. 10 Responding to the latter recommendation, the Law Society of the Cape Par 14.5, p. 652 of the discussion paper. Act 37 of Par 14.5, p of the discussion paper.
5 196 of Good Hope proposed that the Natural Fathers of Children Born out of Wedlock Act 11 and other ancillary Acts such as the General Law Further Amendment Act 12 and the Maintenance Act 13 be similarly amended. The Commission supports this proposal Parenting education The Commission recommended that any parent seeking a divorce should be required to participate in an education programme to help him or her become aware of the post-separation reaction of parents and children, children's developmental needs at different ages, the benefits of co-operative parenting after divorce, parental rights and responsibilities, and the availability and benefits of mediation and other forms of dispute resolution, provided such programmes are available. The Family Advocate is in an ideal position to coordinate such educational programmes. Parents should not be required to attend sessions together. The Commission emphasised that its recommendation in this regard is not aimed at putting hurdles in the way of those who wish to divorce, but to equip parents to be sensitive to the needs of their children during and post the divorce. 14 The Dutch Reformed Church, Pretoria, Ms R van Zyl and Africa Christian Action welcomed the Commission's recommendations. Africa Christian Action recommended that parenting education programmes be operated by family organisations or churches. Some of the respondents who commented on this section were not in favour of the Commission s recommendations. For instance, the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope pointed out that the Commission s recommendations may create practical problems such as further overloading the Family Advocate. The respondent further highlighted the lack of resources to implement the proposed system. Ms Julie Todd submitted that the high case load of the Family Advocate will not allow it to coordinate parenting education programmes. The Commission notes these concerns. However, given the expertise of the Family Advocate, it is best positioned to coordinate the proposed parenting education programmes. Furthermore, the concern of overloading the Family Advocate could be addressed by requiring that the Department of Justice of of of Par 14.5, p. 657 of the discussion paper.
6 197 must, when preparing its draft budget for a coming financial year, include in the draft budget an amount for the purpose of enabling the Office of the Family Advocate to perform the function of coordinating parenting education programmes. Christian Lawyers Association of Southern Africa submitted that the Commission's recommendations with regard to parenting education may be impractical in that the courts cannot force people to be good parents and to take a sincere interest in their children's well-being. The respondent argued that requiring participation in a parenting education programme may be a burden on a single parent who is often overwhelmed with the responsibility of caring for the children - the parent needs more time with the children and should not be required to be away from the children at certain times. The respondent thus recommended that education programmes (such as an advice bureau where parents can be provided with a wide range of advice and assistance) be made available to those who need it, with special support for those who need practical assistance. The Commission is mindful of the fact that requiring parents to participate in an education programme would not instantly convert them into good parents. However, the Commission is of the view that it is in the best interests of children that, for the reasons stated above, parents be required to participate in a parenting education programme before a decree of divorce is granted. CHILDS submitted that some children and their parents should also be required to attend an education workshop to assist them to deal with the separation and/or divorce. This should be completed on a prescribed form Joint custody As stated in the discussion paper, the Commission is of the view that the law should encourage parents to enter into consensual arrangements for shared parenting (joint custody) in the form of parenting plans. The Commission therefore recommended that section 6 of the Divorce Act, section 5 of the Matrimonial Affairs Act and the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act be amended to require that parties applying to a court for a parenting order must file a proposed parenting plan with the court; 15 Christian Lawyers Association of Southern Africa submitted that this 15 The Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope supported this recommendation.
7 198 recommendation overlooks the fact that neither parents might have had a divorce before and although they may have an idea how they are going to deal with parenting jointly, it is often required that the plan be flexible and subject to review. Furthermore, making a parenting plan a requirement would place a formalism and rigidity on the order that is undesirable. The Commission disagrees with Christian Lawyers Association of Southern Africa that it is undesirable to make a parenting plan a requirement when applying to the court for a parenting order. In fact, a parenting plan has the advantage of reducing unnecessary litigation over child issues and helps parents to continue with a healthy parental relationship after separation. The Commission accordingly endorses its preliminary recommendation. The Commission recommended that divorcing parents should be encouraged to develop, on their own or with the help of a trained mediator or through some form of alternative dispute resolution, a parenting plan setting out details about each parent's responsibilities for residence, care, contact, decision-making and financial security for the children, together with the dispute resolution process to be used by the parties. Parenting plans must also require the sharing between parents of health, educational and other information related to the child's development and social activities. All parenting orders should be in the form of parenting plans. Furthermore, the relationships of grandparents, siblings and other extended family members with the children should be recognised as significant and provisions for maintaining and fostering such relationships, where they are in the best interests of those children, should be included in parenting plans. 16 The Commission further recommended as follows: 17 That where allegations of child abuse surface in divorce cases, whether in the affidavits, in evidence, or as a result of the investigations conducted by the Family Advocate, or otherwise, the Court hearing the divorce matter may, of its own accord or upon application, order that the divorce matter stand down and order a children s court enquiry. This should reduce conflict in divorce proceedings by removing the incentive for making false allegations and should Par. 14.5, p.661 of the discussion paper. Par. 14.5, p of the discussion paper.
8 199 provide those children who are at risk of abuse with the protective framework of the new children s statute. That both parents of a child receive information and records in respect of the child's development and social activities, such as school records, medical records and other relevant information. The obligation to provide such information should lie with the parent who has care ( custody ) of the child, unless ordered otherwise by a court. That the word sole be deleted in the wording of section 1 of the General Law Further Amendment Act. This will have the effect of making it a criminal offence for the parent having care of the child to unreasonably refuse the other parent access to their child. It is further recommended that section 1 of the General Law Further Amendment Act 93 of 1962, as then amended, be repealed after having been incorporated in the new children s statute. Mr Stuard McDonald proposed that joint custody should be the point of departure for all divorcing couples. He suggested that clear and concise guidelines on the content of a parenting plan should be made available to mediators and divorcing parents. Such guidelines could also be gazetted. With regard to information in respect of a child s development, Mr McDonald proposed that the non-custodian parent should be able to obtain such information directly from, e.g. the school, hospital, sports club etc. Thus, the non-custodian parent should not have to wait to be provided with such information by the parent who has the care of the child. The Commission does not agree with Mr McDonald s proposal that joint custody should be the starting point in divorce as joint custody may not always be in the best interests of a child. The Commission agrees with Mr McDonald that guidelines on the content of parenting plans should be readily available to divorcing parents. The Commission also supports Mr McDonald s view that the non-custodian parent s access to information in respect of a child s development should not be dependent on being provided with such information by the custodian parent. Thus, where the custodian parent unreasonably withholds such information from the non custodian parent, the child and family court should be able to order that the noncustodian parent be provided direct access to such information. CHILDS suggested that the term joint custody be replaced with the term shared parental responsibility.
9 The maternal preference or tender years rule Until fairly recently, South African courts have tended to apply a so-called maternal preference or tender years principle (namely the principle that the custody of young children - and of girls of any age - should normally be given to the mother in preference to the father, 18 unless the mother s character or past conduct renders her unfit, 19 in the court s view, to have such custody, or unless the father s circumstances enable him to make better provision for the needs and well-being of the child). It has been argued that this maternal preference or tender years principle could be seen as violating the equality clause in the Constitution by discriminating between parents on the grounds of gender (although it is submitted that this would in many instances be justified by courts on the basis of the best interests of the child). 20 With the removal of the concepts of custody and access, the outdated and discredited tender years doctrine or maternal preference rule is clearly no longer useful. The Commission accordingly recommended that the common-law tender years doctrine or maternal preference rule be rejected as a guide for decision-making about parenting. 21 Ms R van Zyl welcomed the Commission s recommendation. CHILDS submitted that the problem of gender bias is far more extensive than in these legal doctrines. The respondent thus recommended that every effort should be made to ensure that the decision-making body is free of gender bias. This can be ensured by, inter alia, basing decisions on established psychological research. Furthermore, decisions should be team-based with equitable representation of male and female Other comments received Adv. G J Van Zyl pointed out that the Commission has missed a crucial point, i.e. that our adversarial system of justice bedevils the issue of custody of children. Also, when See, e.g. Tabb v Tabb 1909 TS 1033 at 1034; Dunsterville v Dunsterville 1946 NDP 594 at 597; Napolitano v Commissioner of Child Welfare, Johannesburg SA 742 (A) at 746C-D; Schwartz v Schwartz SA 467 (A) at 480F-G; Fortune v Fortune SA 348 (A). In Mohaud v Mohaud SA 348 (T) Vieyra J awarded custody of three young children (two of whom were girls) to the father rather than the mother (who had committed adultery on several occasions) in the light of his findings that the mother was a person so immature in character, so emotionally unstable, so lacking in discretion, so confused in her moral ideas that despite the youthfulness of the children, it would not be in their interests to entrust their custody to her. See Van der Linde v Van der Linde SA 509 (O). See also V v V SA 169 (C) at 176F-G and 177B. Par of the discussion paper.
10 201 the custody of children is in issue, a lot of allegations and counter-allegations are made which can traumatise children. He therefore suggested that the custody of children should be adjudicated on an inquisitorial basis separately from the divorce proceedings. Furthermore, in custody proceedings, parents should be able to stake their claims without resort to the traditional manner of allegations and counter-allegations. The Commission does recommend that where issues of possible child abuse surface in divorce proceedings, the court be able to order that the divorce matter stand down and a children s court enquiry be initiated. 22 This, in the Commission s view, will reduce the making of false allegations in divorce proceedings. Adv. Van Zyl submitted that the enforcement of custody orders is notoriously inadequate as parents are reluctant to lay criminal charges against a custodian parent for failure to abide by the terms of a custody order. He suggested that the General Law Further Amendment Act should be amended by deleting the word sole where it appears before the word custody. The Commission agrees with this suggestion. Adv. Van Zyl also referred to a letter published in the De Rebus, 23 in which he suggested a more innovative approach along the lines of the present Domestic Violence Act. He stated that it is not helpful to criminalise refusal of contact by one parent as the child might feel that he or she has been the cause of sending one parent to jail. CHILDS recommended that the following section be added to this chapter: Irretrievable breakdown of marriage when minor children are involved. The respondent suggested that both parents be required to prove the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Parents have to undergo some form of marital/spousal/relationship counselling. A competent counsellor recognised by the community should be required to fill in a prescribed form declaring that the marriage has broken down irretrievably. Such a requirement must be met before a divorce can be granted. The Commission is of the view that it is not desirable to force parents with children to stay married by requiring that both parents should prove the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. In fact, the continuation of a marriage may sometimes not be in the best interests of children as children may be caught between continued marital disputes. Mr Lionel Greenberg, from KID (Kinder In Divorce), submitted that the win-loose See par above. February 1999, p.8.
11 202 scenario is a priority on the agenda of the attorney / advocate. He stated that due consideration should be given to children and that children should be provided with an advocate ad litem by default. Mr Greenberg argued that an order granting a divorce should encourage visitation rather than to limit parental involvement in the life of the child. Thus, the order should be a guideline and not be used to obstruct the father s involvement. Further, the order should set a minimum commitment level and not a maximum Conclusion The Commission is of the view that legislative provisions for the protection of children caught in the separation or divorce of their parents should be provided for in divorce legislation. In light of the research undertaken and the submissions received, the Commission is convinced that the legal position of children in divorce or separation proceedings urgently needs reconsideration. The Commission is therefore considering including in its programme an investigation into these aspects. Obviously, such an investigation would have to go beyond the confines of the Divorce Act to also consider the General Law Further Amendment Act, the Matrimonial Affairs Act, and the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act.
Case no: 183/2013. Date heard: 14.2.2013. Order given: 15.2.2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN Case no: 183/2013 Date heard: 14.2.2013 Order given: 15.2.2013 In the matter between: G J U Applicant and B U (born Van Der Watt) Respondent
More informationIssue Brief. Arizona State Senate LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AND PARENTING TIME INTRODUCTION DETERMINING LEGAL DECISION-MAKING AND PARENTING TIME
Arizona State Senate Issue Brief January 17, 2014 Note to Reader: The Senate Research Staff provides nonpartisan, objective legislative research, policy analysis and related assistance to the members of
More informationThe Family Law Process: Highway to Hell or Road to Resolution?
The Family Law Process: Highway to Hell or Road to Resolution? When a relationship breaks down and separation between spouses is imminent, an array of emotions and counterproductive thoughts drive some
More informationA BRIEF INTRODUCTION INTO DIVORCE LAW: THE BASICS OF OHIO DIVORCE LAW By BETH SILVERMAN, J.D.
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION INTO DIVORCE LAW: THE BASICS OF OHIO DIVORCE LAW By BETH SILVERMAN, J.D. How can a marriage be terminated in Ohio? There are two primary ways to terminate a marriage: Dissolution or
More informationGuidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family
More informationBC Association of Clinical Counsellors THE NEW FAMILY LAW ACT
BC Association of Clinical Counsellors Legal Commentary * THE NEW FAMILY LAW ACT What clinical counsellors need to know about BC s new legislation before they provide counselling services to families undergoing
More informationAN OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN FAMILY LAW
AN OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN FAMILY LAW For the information of clients and prospective clients of Kennedy Partners The breakdown of a marriage or de facto (including same sex) relationship can give rise to
More informationThis submission on the review of the Family Court reflects the views of the National Collective of Independent Women s Refuges.
Family Court Review This submission on the review of the Family Court reflects the views of the National Collective of Independent Women s Refuges. The National Collective of Independent Women s Refuges
More informationIntroduction To Custody
1 2 3 172 4 S H ER MAN A VE, S U ITE 201 E VANS TO N, IL 60201 WWW.JESF AM IL Y L AW. C OM Introduction To Custody By Joshua E. Stern, Esq. It goes without saying that parents value their children s health
More informationAn electronic version of this document is available at: www.extension.umn.edu/parentsforever
1 W1 We Agree: Creating a Parenting Plan Parenting Agreement Worksheet Minnesota Version This worksheet will help parents put together a parenting plan that meets the needs of their children as they parent
More informationFamily Law Handbook. Understanding the legal implications of MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE in Washington State
Family Law Handbook Understanding the legal implications of MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE in Washington State July 2014 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 CHAPTER 1 MARRIAGE IN WASHINGTON STATE... 2 CHAPTER 2
More informationAn Introduction to Child and Family Law. August 12, 2014
An Introduction to Child and Family Law August 12, 2014 Outline Court system Marriage and common-law spouses Breakdown of a marriage or common-law relationship Division of family property Support Custody/access
More informationDivorce Law in Iowa. Iowa Legal Aid. When the Family. Questions and Answers. iowalegalaid.org. About Iowa Law on Divorce Issues
Divorce Law in Iowa When the Family Has Questions and Answers About Iowa Law on Divorce Issues Iowa Legal Aid iowalegalaid.org IMPORTANT NOTICE: READ THIS INFORMATION BEFORE USING ANY PART OF THIS PUBLICATION
More informationADOPTION. The Adoption Law All adoptions filed in the state of Missouri are governed by the same 1123
ADOPTION What is Adoption? Adoption is a legal process that establishes a parent/child relationship between two people who are not otherwise related by blood. There are three sets of participants in an
More informationA Guide for Larimer County Parents
Services Child Protection A Guide for Larimer County Parents This booklet was prepared by the Program Committee of the Larimer County Child Advocacy Center in consultation with the Larimer County Department
More informationINFORMATION ON DIVORCE IN FLORIDA
INFORMATION ON DIVORCE IN FLORIDA CAN YOUR MARRIAGE BE SAVED? Are you sure your marriage cannot be saved? Before you take any legal steps to end your marriage, you may consider possible ways to save it.
More informationGrandparent Custody and Visitation Issues
Chapter 14 Grandparent Custody and Visitation Issues Melody K. Fuller, Esq.* Melody K. Fuller, P.C. SYNOPSIS 14-1. Grandparent Visitation Issues 14-2. Custody of Grandchildren 14-3. Resources This chapter
More informationSTUDENT LEGAL SERVICES CHILD, YOUTH & FAMILY ENHANCEMENT ACT A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER
COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING CHILD, YOUTH & FAMILY ENHANCEMENT ACT version: 2010 STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES OF EDMONTON GENERAL All information is provided for general knowledge
More informationWHEREAS, children caught in the middle of high parental conflict are more likely to be harmed; and
THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 06-1 (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 06-03 IN RE: PARENTING COORDINATION IN FAMILY LAW CASES WHEREAS, children caught in
More informationDIVORCE GUIDANCE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida (813) 828-4422
DIVORCE GUIDANCE IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida (813) 828-4422 ECONOMIC ISSUES REGARDING MARRIAGE AND DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ASSETS
More informationDivorce in Florida CAN YOUR MARRIAGE BE SAVED? Before you take any legal steps to end your marriage, you should make sure that you have tried all possible ways to save it. Do you want professional help
More informationSELF-REPRESENTED UNCONTESTED DIVORCE IN NEW YORK STATE Rural Law Center of New York, Inc.
This material is provided to answer general questions about the law in New York State. The information and forms were created to assist readers with general issues and not specific situations, and, as
More informationAlternatives to court
Chapter 7 Do not use this guide for legal advice. It provides information only, and that information only applies to British Columbian law, services, and benefits. Consult with a lawyer for advice related
More informationNEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT. An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.
NEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of
More informationPractice Guidelines for Custody and Access Assessments
Practice Guidelines for Custody and Access Assessments Guidelines for Social Work Members of the Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers Effective September 1, 2009 2009 Ontario College
More informationIn Your Child s Best Interest
In Your Child s Best Interest A Handbook for Separating/Divorcing Parents Includes information about: Includes information about: Court Ordered Programs Parenting Plan Deploying Military Parents Mediation
More informationPARENT AND CHILD. Chapter Twelve
Chapter Twelve PARENT AND CHILD Every person under the age of 18 is considered a minor in the State of Alaska. Upon your 18th birthday, you reach the age of majority. [AS 25.20.010.] Parents have certain
More informationMen in Charge? Gender Equality and Children s Rights in Contemporary Families
International Day of Families 2015 Observance Men in Charge? Gender Equality and Children s Rights in Contemporary Families Background Note Gender equality and children s rights in family laws Fair legal
More informationNon-Custodial Parent Rights in South Carolina July 2010
Non-Custodial Parent Rights in South Carolina July 2010 The legal information in this publication is designed to help you learn about the laws that apply when you have a child and you are not married to
More informationGUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS FOR CHILDREN IN THE FOURTH DEPARTMENT
NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT HONORABLE HENRY J. SCUDDER PRESIDING JUSTICE GUIDELINES FOR ATTORNEYS FOR CHILDREN IN THE FOURTH DEPARTMENT PREFACE The Departmental Advisory
More informationDivorce. Consumer Pamphlet Series
Divorce Consumer Pamphlet Series Foreword Divorce affects, directly or indirectly, virtually every family in the country. The following information is designed to briefly summarize Georgia s divorce laws.
More informationChild Abuse, Child Neglect. What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated
Child Abuse, Child Neglect What Parents Should Know If They Are Investigated Written by South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center with editing and assistance from the Children s Law Center and the
More informationFamily Law Client Information Package
Family Law Client Information Package The end of a relationship can be very difficult. In addition to the obvious emotional issues, couples are often faced with challenging financial and legal problems.
More informationFAMILY LAW. February 2015
February 2015 CONSIDERING DIVORCE OUR SERVICE stbb smith tabata buchanan boyes is a firm of business-minded lawyers which was established in 1900. At present the firm consists of approximately 90 professionals
More informationAs you read through this book, you will be introduced to topics such as:
Introduction Few situations are more gut-wrenchingly painful for a parent than a child custody dispute that ends up being decided in a courtroom. The rules and procedures established by legislators and
More informationTHE BASICS Getting a Divorce in New York State
THE BASICS Getting a Divorce in New York State Either the wife or the husband can ask a Court for a divorce. In this booklet, we say that the wife is the person who will go to Court to request a divorce
More informationC H A P T E R 9 CHILD CUSTODY. JENNIFER K. DIERINGER, ESQ. Western Massachusetts Legal Services, Springfield
C H A P T E R 9 CHILD CUSTODY JENNIFER K. DIERINGER, ESQ. Western Massachusetts Legal Services, Springfield SUSAN R. ELSEN, ESQ. Massachusetts Law Reform Institute, Boston STEPHANIE E. GOLDENHERSH, ESQ.
More informationWhen Disputes Continue--Are Parenting Coordinators the Answer? Leah Pallin-Hill
When Disputes Continue--Are Parenting Coordinators the Answer? Leah Pallin-Hill You just completed 16 months of litigation in dissolution proceeding. The financial issues paled in comparison to the emotional
More informationPart 1 Interpretation
Part 1 Interpretation This Part defines terms and provides some general principles of interpretation for the Family Law Act. Section 1 Definitions Section 1 changes some definitions and adds others that
More informationFAMILY COURT PRACTICE NOTE LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: SELECTION, APPOINTMENT AND OTHER MATTERS
PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE S CHAMBERS FAMILY COURT PRACTICE NOTE LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: SELECTION, APPOINTMENT AND OTHER MATTERS 1 BACKGROUND 1.1 The terms of this Practice Note have been settled in consultation
More informationSUBPART B: COLLABORATIVE DIVORCE
ONWARD AND UPWARD SECTION B: DISPUTE RESOLUTION CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SUBPART B: COLLABORATIVE DIVORCE By Andrea Vacca, Esq. Collaborative law is a process that can help a couple come
More informationMinistry of Attorney General Justice Services Branch Civil and Family Law Policy Office. Family Relations Act Review. Chapter 12
Ministry of Attorney General Justice Services Branch Civil and Family Law Policy Office Family Relations Act Review Chapter 12 Discussion Paper Prepared by the Civil and Family Law Policy Office August
More informationDIVORCE ACT 70 OF 1979
Page 1 of 12 DIVORCE ACT 70 OF 1979 [ASSENTED TO 8 JUNE 1979] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 1 JULY 1979] (Afrikaans text signed by the Acting State President) as amended by Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984
More informationWelcome. David P. Badanes, esq.
Welcome Thank you for considering me in your divorce. The Badanes Law Office prides itself on recognizing that each divorce is different and that each divorce requires different skills. We understand that
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 8 PARENTING TIME/PARENTING RESPONSIBILITIES ASSESSMENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Practice Note 8 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 8 PARENTING TIME/PARENTING RESPONSIBILITIES ASSESSMENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND APPLICATION.....................................
More informationCHAPTER 50. C.2A:23D-1 Short title. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the New Jersey Family Collaborative Law Act.
CHAPTER 50 AN ACT concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: C.2A:23D-1 Short
More informationEstablishing Court-Ordered Paternity: A Guide for Unmarried Parents
Utah Guidelines Establishing Court-Ordered Paternity: A Guide for Unmarried Parents This information is provided for unmarried parents who seek paternity orders from a Utah court to establish parenting
More informationCollaborative Law Participation Agreement
Form 15-3 Form 15-3 This form is written for a divorce case but may be reworded as appropriate for any other family law situation. Purpose [Name of wife] and [name of husband] (the parties ) have chosen
More informationDivorce in Virginia. What are the Grounds for Divorce?
Divorce in Virginia Given the increase in marital breakdown in our society, almost everyone has been or could be affected in some way by a separation or divorce. Dissolving a marriage often involves property
More informationDIVORCE LAW REFORM A SUMMARY OF THE LAW REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROPOSALS. Legal Assistance Centre 2005
DIVORCE LAW REFORM A SUMMARY OF THE LAW REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PROPOSALS Legal Assistance Centre 2005 This is a summary of a bill proposed by the Law Reform and Development Commission (LRDC).
More informationCustody and guardianship of children
Custody and guardianship of children Felicity!Owoses-/Goagoses Introduction Pursuant to its powers under Article 44 1 of the Namibian Constitution, Parliament 2 enacted the Children s Status Act. 3 The
More informationFamily Violence Reports and Inquiries. Reports and Inquiries
Family Violence Reports and Inquiries Presented by Nicky Davies, Director Family Law Civil Justice and Advice Services, Legal Aid Queensland 28 August 2010 Reports and Inquiries Evaluation of 2006 Family
More informationBy Judith L. Huddart
HIGH-CONFLICT CUSTODY CASES IN CANADA By Judith L. Huddart This paper was originally presented at a conference in 2001 held by the International Society of Family Lawyers in Kingston, Ontario. Are we really
More informationThe Process of Mediation in the Family Court
The Process of Mediation in the Family Court MINISTRY FOR JUSTICE, CULTURE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT 2 The Process of Mediation in the Family Court Information booklet issued by the Law Courts, Malta October
More informationEnhancing Online Safety for Children Bill 2014 and Enhancing Online Safety for Children (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014
Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Environment & Communications PO Box 6100 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 19 January 2015 To Whom It May Concern, Enhancing Online Safety for Children
More informationPost Separation Parenting in Ireland
Post Separation Parenting in Ireland Paper presented at Post Separated families and shared residence Evelyn Mahon Post Separation Parenting a study of Family Law Courts in Ireland 1 National Children s
More informationQuick Reference Guide: Handling Custody Issues in the School
Dallas Independent School District Quick Reference Guide: Handling Custody Issues in the School Office of Legal Services Administration Building, Box 69 972-925-3250 (main) 972-925-3251 (fax) Updated August
More informationSubmission to the Ministry of Justice. Review of the Family Court
Submission to the Ministry of Justice Review of the Family Court 29 February, 2012 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on issues facing the Family Court. We will be pleased to provide further comment.
More informationFIXED FEE DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW SERVICES
01226 210000 www.mkbsolicitors.co.uk info@mkbsolicitors.co.uk Please feel free to telephone the office and request to speak to a member of the family team Page 1 of 12 If your relationship has broken down
More informationDivorce Mediation Myths
Divorce Mediation Myths Debunking divorce mediation myths: Facts about the mediation process. Myth: Mediation allows one spouse to dominate another. Fact: A good mediator pays close attention to the power
More informationCHAPTER 14 THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN CAUGHT UP IN THE DIVORCE / SEPARATION OF THEIR PARENTS
CHAPTER 14 THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN CAUGHT UP IN THE DIVORCE / SEPARATION OF THEIR PARENTS 14.1 Introduction This Chapter focusses on the care and protection of children who are, or who have been, caught
More informationDIVORCE AND SEPARATION
DIVORCE AND SEPARATION What are the reasons for a divorce? In Virginia, you can get a divorce for six reasons. Two reasons don't need a waiting period: Adultery, sodomy or buggery. These are very difficult
More informationCONDUCT FAULT AND FAMILY LAW by Norman A. Katter, Law Book Company, 1987. $24.
296 SYDNEY LAW REVIEW [VOL. 12 CONDUCT FAULT AND FAMILY LAW by Norman A. Katter, Law Book Company, 1987. $24. His Honour, Mr. Justice Selby in Oliver v. Oliver (1969) 13 F.L.R. 397 at 405 said, in the
More informationGUIDELINES FOR INDEPENDENT CHILDREN S LAWYERS
GUIDELINES FOR INDEPENDENT CHILDREN S LAWYERS (6 December 2007) These Guidelines have been endorsed by the Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, and also by the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
More informationIf you are currently involved in a marital dispute, you may be going through a very painful experience.
What to do in a marital dispute? Marriage counselling Separation and divorce Family mediation Negotiation Collaborative Family Law Litigation What to do in a marital dispute? If you are currently involved
More informationGuide to Divorce and Separation
Family Law Web Guide A guide by Guillaumes Solicitors Introduction The breakdown of a relationship can be a difficult and challenging time. The pressure and anxiety of splitting up, applying for divorce,
More informationIN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 B E T W E E N : TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE Plaintiffs - and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN
More informationIn divorce or civil partnership dissolution the court's first consideration is given to the welfare of any children under the age of 18.
How Is A Divorce Settlement Reached? In divorce or civil partnership dissolution the court's first consideration is given to the welfare of any children under the age of 18. In financial proceedings the
More information2015 IL App (2d) 150427-U No. 2-15-0427 Order filed October 15, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT
-U No. 2-15-0427 Order filed October 15, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule
More informationRule 60A - Child and Adult Protection
Rule 60A - Child and Adult Protection Scope of Rule 60A 60A.01(1) This Rule is divided into four parts and it provides procedure for each of the following: (c) (d) protection of a child, and other purposes,
More informationPintar Albiston Las Vegas Family Law Attorneys
HOW DOES THE JUDGE DECIDE CUSTODY ISSUES IN NEVADA? In the state of Nevada, parents who are separating or divorcing are encouraged to work together outside of court to determine who should have custody
More informationSOUTH AFRICAN REQUIREMENTS FOR MINORS TRAVELLING INTERNATIONALLY
SOUTH AFRICAN REQUIREMENTS FOR MINORS TRAVELLING INTERNATIONALLY 1. Background Pursuant to the 2011 amendments to the Immigration Act, 2002 (Act No 13 of 2002) and the subsequent Immigration Regulations
More informationProperty Settlements in the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court
Property Settlements in the Family Court and the Federal Magistrates Court This information is based on the law as at. It is written for the use and benefit of women who contact the Women s Legal Centre
More informationMental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Bill
Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Bill [AS AMENDED AT STAGE 2] Section CONTENTS PART 1 INTRODUCTORY A1 Principles for discharging certain functions B1 Welfare of the child 1 Equal opportunities
More informationNew York State Senate Judiciary Committee. Hearing on Spousal Maintenance Calculations September 24, 2013
New York State Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Spousal Maintenance Calculations September 24, 2013 Written Testimony of the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) Good afternoon and thank you for
More informationGuardianship and Third Party Custody Law Sample Pleadings for Indiana Attorneys (These Documents Should Not be Used by Unrepresented Parties)
Guardianship and Third Party Custody Law Sample Pleadings for Indiana Attorneys (These Documents Should Not be Used by Unrepresented Parties Attachment A: Verified Petition for Appointment of Temporary
More informationDivorce Law in Iowa. Working for Fairness. iowalegalaid.org
Divorce Law in Iowa Working for Fairness Iowa Legal Aid iowalegalaid.org IMPORTANT NOTICE: READ THIS INFORMATION BEFORE USING ANY PART OF THIS PUBLICATION This booklet is a general summary of the law.
More informationCHECKLIST FOR THE PREPARATION AND REVIEW OF A PETITION FOR ADOPTION INVOLVING A DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY ADOPTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A.
FOR ADOPTION INVOLVING A DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY ADOPTIVE PLACEMENT PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. 19-8-4 REV. 07/8/2007 Page 1 of 6 NOTE: This checklist is intended as a guide to the practitioner in the preparation
More informationMediation for Reconciliation
Mediation for Reconciliation The Family Law Act 1996, Part 2, provided for information meetings for parties contemplating divorce. Under provisions which remain on the statute book, the requirements relating
More informationReport of the Matrimonial Law Section on A 6418 / S 2447
Report of the Matrimonial Law Section on A 6418 / S 2447 This report reflects the opinion of the Matrimonial Law Section only. It has not been approved by the Board of the Directors of the New York County
More informationThe Children Act 1989
The Children Act 1989 The Children Act 1989 supplemental guidance: Volume 1 Court Orders For social work practitioners, directors of social services, heads of children s services and local authorities
More informationADOPTION & FAMILY INFORMATION SERVICE. Level 1 45 Wakefield Street Adelaide 5000 South Australia. GPO Box 292 Adelaide 5001 South Australia
Level 1 45 Wakefield Street Adelaide 5000 South Australia GPO Box 292 Adelaide 5001 South Australia Phone: +61 8 8207 0060 Fax: +61 8 8207 0066 Email: adoptions@dfc.sa.gov.au Web: www.adoptions.sa.gov.au
More informationCURRENT CHALLENGES IN THE FAMILY LAW COURTS. I would first like to thank the Department of Justice & Equality and the Minister for
CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THE FAMILY LAW COURTS I would first like to thank the Department of Justice & Equality and the Minister for extending an invitation to me to speak at this important seminar on the
More informationWHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE?
INTRODUCTION As a parent contemplating or going through a divorce, the whole process may seem complex, unintuitive, or just plain absurd. With this report you can begin to get an understanding of the courts
More informationAbout the Collaborative Family Law Institute and the Collaborative Divorce Process
About the Collaborative Family Law Institute and the Collaborative Divorce Process The Collaborative Family Law Institute is an association of skilled, like-minded attorneys, mental health professionals
More informationPresentation of Allan Haubrich, Q.C. Saint Paul's Hospital Foundation Planned Giving Seminar. Substitute Decision Making
Presentation of Allan Haubrich, Q.C Saint Paul's Hospital Foundation Planned Giving Seminar Why is a Substitute Decision Maker Needed Substitute Decision Making 1. Why do we need a substitute decision
More informationPRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT
PRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT 1 INTRODUCTION AND COMMENCEMENT 1.1 This Code of Conduct for lawyers appointed to act for children in Family Court proceedings replaces the previous
More informationFamily Law in the NWT. Rights. Responsibilities. Answers. Information.
Family Law in the NWT. Rights. Responsibilities. Answers. Information. March 2013 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE v Table of Contents Section 1 Family Law in the NWT WHAT IS FAMILY LAW? 1-1 ACTS AND REGULATIONS
More informationUNIFORM COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT S.B. 714: ANALYSIS AS ENACTED
UNIFORM COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT S.B. 714: ANALYSIS AS ENACTED Senate Bill 714 (as enacted) PUBLIC ACT 159 of 2014 Sponsor: Senator Tonya Schuitmaker Senate Committee: Judiciary House Committee: Judiciary
More informationAll Women. One Family Law.
7 Family Law Arbitration ENG 007 FAMILY LAW FOR WOMEN IN ONTARIO All Women. One Family Law. Know your Rights. Family Law Arbitration This booklet is meant to give you a basic understanding of legal issues.
More informationIntroduction to Family Law in Montana
Introduction to Family Law in Montana Table of Contents 1. Warning... 2 2. Where Can I Get Help?... 3 3. How to Use this Packet... 3 4. Introduction to Family Law... 4 A. Dissolution of Marriage... 4 B.
More informationChild Custody and Access Assessments Standards of Practice
Child Custody and Access Assessments Standards of Practice Child Custody and Access Assesments Standards of Practice 2010 First Edition: September 2002 Reprinted: 2010 British Columbia College of Social
More informationPARENT GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT CHIPS PROCESS
PARENT GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT CHIPS PROCESS INTRODUCTION This booklet has been prepared to help parents gain a better understanding of what to expect in Juvenile Court CHIPS proceedings (Chapter 48
More informationSOME THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN FILING FOR CUSTODY OR VISITATION MYTHS AND REALITIES
SOME THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN FILING FOR CUSTODY OR VISITATION MYTHS AND REALITIES The father is the parent responsible for supporting the child. The law states that both parents have an equal obligation
More informationCabinet Member (Finance and Resources) (Gary Layzell)
Agenda Item No. REPORT TO: Cabinet Member (Finance and Resources) DATE: 25 March 2015 SERVICE AREA: REPORTING OFFICER: SUBJECT: WARD/S AFFECTED: FORWARD PLAN REF: Finance Benefits Services Manager (Gary
More informationa complicated court structure. Having their cases handled in this way cost them time and money, led to confusion and jeopardized their safety.
http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/problem_solving/idv/home.shtml Page 1 of 2 Overview PROBLEM-SOLVING COURTS (HOME) Integrated Domestic Court Locations Domestic Drug Treatment Courts Mental Health Courts
More informationDescribe your current employment, including duties, hours, rate of pay and benefits?
CUSTODY INTAKE Name Address Home phone Business phone Cell phone(s) fax e-mail(s) Social Security # other contacts length of marriage (present; and priors) Describe your educational background Describe
More informationChildren and child law guide
Children and child law guide FEBRUARY 2010 For more briefings visit mourantozannes.com This briefing is only intended to give a summary and general overview of the subject matter. It is not intended to
More informationFamily Law Act CHAPTER 27. Reprinted 1999
Family Law Act 1996 CHAPTER 27 First Published 1996 Reprinted 1999 Family Law Act 1996 CHAPTER 27 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRINCIPLES OF PARTS II AND III Section 1. The general principles underlying
More informationPROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 39009
More information