arxiv: v2 [q-fin.mf] 4 Mar 2015

Transcription

1 Phynance Zura Kakushadze 1 arxiv: v [q-fin.mf] 4 Mar 15 Quanigic R Soluions LLC 117 High Ridge Road #135, Samford, CT 695 Deparmen of Physics, Universiy of Connecicu 1 Universiy Place, Samford, CT 691 (May 6, 14 Dedicaed o he memory of my faher Jemal Kakushadze, Ph.D. (194-5 Absrac These are he lecure noes for an advanced Ph.D. level course I augh in Spring a he C.N. Yang Insiue for Theoreical Physics a Sony Brook. The course primarily focused on an inroducion o sochasic calculus and derivaive pricing wih various sochasic compuaions recas in he language of pah inegral, which is used in heoreical physics, hence Phynance. I also included several quiz problems(wih soluions comprised of(pre-inerview quesions quaniaive finance job candidaes were someimes asked back in hose days. The course o a cerain exen follows an excellen book Financial Calculus: An Inroducion o Derivaive Pricing by M. Baxer and A. Rennie. 1 zura@quanigic.com. s poining ou any ypos or oher inadveren errors ha slipped hrough he cracks are more han welcome and will be grealy appreciaed. DISCLAIMER: This address is used by he corresponding auhor for no purpose oher han o indicae his professional affiliaion as is cusomary in publicaions. In paricular, he conens of his paper are no inended as an invesmen, legal, ax or any oher such advice, and in no way represen views of Quanigic Soluions LLC, he websie or any of heir oher affiliaes.

2 Conens 1 Inroducion: How Does Bookie he Crookie Make Money? 4 Bid, Ask and Spread 5 3 Socks, Bonds and Free Markes 6 4 Arbirage Pricing 11 5 Binomial Tree Model Risk-neural Measure An Example: Baseball World Series Maringales The Tower Law Maringale Measure Binomial Represenaion Theorem Self-financing Hedging Sraegies The Self-financing Propery Discree vs. Coninuous Models Brownian Moion Sochasic Calculus Iô Calculus Radon-Nikodym Process Pah Inegral Coninuous Radon-Nikodym Process Cameron-Marin-Girsanov Theorem Coninuous Maringales Driflessness Maringale Represenaion Theorem Coninuous Hedging Change of Measure in he General One-Sock Model Terminal Value Pricing A Differen Formulaion An Insrucive Example The Hea Kernel Mehod European Opions: Call, Pu and Binary 4 1

3 1 The Black-Scholes Model Call Opion Pu Opion Binary Opion Hedging in he Black-Scholes Model Call Opion Pu Opion Binary Opion Price, Time and Volailiy Dependence Call Opion Pu Opion Binary Opion American Opions Upper and Lower Bounds on Opion Prices Early Exercise Equiies and Dividends An Example Periodic Dividends Muliple Sock Models The Degenerae Case Arbirage-free Complee Models Numeraires Change of Numeraire Foreign Exchange 66 The Ineres Rae Marke 67.1 The Heah-Jarrow-Moron (HJM Model Muli-facor HJM Models Shor-rae Models The Ho and Lee Model The Vasicek/Hull-Whie Model The Cox-Ingersoll-Ross Model The Black-Karasinski Model

4 Ineres Rae Producs 77.1 Forward Measures Muliple Paymen Conracs Bonds wih Coupons Floaing Rae Bonds Swaps Bond Opions Bond Opions in he Vasicek Model Opions on Coupon Bonds Caps and Floors Swapions The General Muli-facor Log-Normal Model The Brace-Gaarek-Musiela (BGM Model Foreign Currency Ineres-rae Models 9 5 Quanos A Forward Quano Conrac Opimal Hedge Raio 91 Acknowledgmens 9 A Some Fun Quesions 9 B Quiz 1 9 C Quiz 97 Bibliography 11 Lis of Figures 1 Figure for Problem 3 in Quiz

5 1 Inroducion: How Does Bookie he Crookie Make Money? When odds are quoed in he form n m agains, i means ha he even has probabiliy m/(n + m, and a successful be of $m is rewarded wih $n (plus he sake reurned. Similarly, when he odds are quoed in he form n m on, i is he same as m n agains. Suppose we have wo horses, wih he rue odds n m agains he firs horse. Suppose he gamblers be oal of B 1 on he firs horse, and B on he oher horse. Then if he firs horse wins, he bookmaker makes a ne profi (his could be a gain or a loss of P 1 = B n m B 1, (1 while if he second horse wins, he bookmaker makes a ne profi of The average long-erm profi is P = B 1 m n B. ( P = m n+m P 1 + n n+m P =, (3 so he bookmaker breaks even by quoing he rue odds. To make a long-erm profi, he bookmaker sells more han 1% of he race by quoing somewha differen odds han he rue odds. Thus, le he odds quoed for he firs and he second horses be n 1 m 1 agains and n m on, respecively. Now he average long-erm profi is [ m P = B n ] 1 B 1 + n [ B 1 m ] B = n+m m 1 n+m n [ nb 1 1 mn ] 1 + mb [ 1 nm ]. (4 n+m nm 1 n+m mn Thus, he bookmaker can guaranee posiive P by seing n 1,m 1 and n,m such ha n 1 < n m 1 m, (5 m < m n n. (6 Noe ha he implied probabiliies hen are larger han he rue probabiliies: m 1 > m n 1 +m 1 n+m, (7 n > n n +m n+m, (8 so ha he bookmaker is, in fac, selling more han 1% of he race. As he saying goes, loery is a ax on people who don know mah. 4

6 Bid, Ask and Spread Somehing similar o he bookmaker example discussed above occurs in financial markes. Le s consider a sock XYZ. There are he buyers, and here are he sellers. The buyers quoe heir bids, he sellers quoe heir asks (or offers, ogeher wih how many shares of he sock hey wan o buy/sell. Le B be he highes bid price, and le A be he lowes ask price. The difference S A B is called he bid-ask spread. Typically, S >. If S = (his is called locked marke, hen he lowes ask A is he same as he highes bid B, and a ransacion will occur a ha price P = A = B, where a seller (or sellers will ransfer o a buyer (or buyers heir shares. The number of shares V sold a ha price equals V = min(v Bid,V Ask, where V Bid is he oal number of shares quoed by he buyers a he price P and V Ask is he oal number of shares quoed by he sellers a he price P. If S < (his is called crossed marke, hen he lowes ask is below he highes bid, and a ransacion will also occur, bu he price P a which i occurs will be in he range A P B and i can depend on a variey of facors, e.g., he precise algorihm employed by a given exchange for deermining P can depend on he iming of when various bids and asks where placed ino he queue by he buyers and sellers. In fac, here migh be more han one prices P i a which he ransacions can occur wih varying numbers of shares V i sold a hose prices. Some buyers/sellers may receive wha is known as price improvemen, e.g., a buyer bids 1 shares of XYZ a he price B and his order is filled (his is marke lingo a a beer price P < B. So, one way o make money in he sock marke is o be a marke-maker, consanly selling a he ask and buying a he bid. Assuming he spread S >, if you buy V shares of XYZ a he bid B and hen urn around and sell hem a he ask A, your profi will be V (A B = V S. You have raded V shares (bough V shares and sold V shares, so your profi-per-share is S/. (Typically, he spread is quoed in cens, and he profi-per-share is quoed in cens-per-share. This is known as making half-spread. Similarly, if you go ino he marke and buy a he ask and sell a he bid his is called buying and selling a marke (because you re paying he marke prices hen you re incurring half-spread ransacion cos on your rades, and he marke-makers are making heir half-spread on your ransacions. Noneheless, pleny of people incur half-spread ransacion cos on heir rades because he way hey make money is no by marke-making bu by capializing on sock price movemens ha are larger han he bid-ask spread. There is echnical analysis, which is based on saisical analysis of marke aciviy based on paerns and does no concern iself wih he fundamenals of each company, which in conras is wha fundamenal analysis does i makes invesmen decisions based on he fundamenals of he company, such as growh poenial, earnings, ec. By is very naure, ypically fundamenal analysis operaes on he ime scales which are longer han hose of echnical analysis. Whaever he mehod, he money making moo is Buy low, sell high! In pracice, i s much harder o do han i sounds. 5

7 3 Socks, Bonds and Free Markes Socks and bonds as well as oher financial insrumens are imporan ingrediens of free marke economy. Financial markes and he economy iself are producs of human civilizaion, and, herefore, are no direcly governed by he fundamenal laws of naure (i.e., laws of physics. Noneheless, i is fascinaing ha hey are based on cerain universal principles, and here are reasons why he financial markes have been efficienly inegraed ino he free marke economy nowihsanding he fac ha he sysem is by no means perfec, which someimes resuls in failures such as sock marke bubbles and crashes. One of he mos fundamenal principles of he free marke economy is he inerplay beween supply and demand. Thus, regardless of wha specifically is being raded, wheher i is goods, commodiies, socks or oher valuable insrumens, buyers, who creae demand, drive is price up, while sellers, who are suppliers, drive he price down. The supply and demand hen deermine he price. For insance, if sellers are asking an unreasonably high price no reflecing curren demand levels, rades a his price are unlikely o occur in large quaniies as he buyers will no be willing o pay more han hey have o. Similarly, if he curren supply level is low, hen a buyer bidding a an unreasonably low price canno expec o successfully complee a rade a ha price mos likely here will be oher buyers bidding a higher price levels more accepable o he suppliers. Sock and bond markes as any oher free marke generally are expeced o operae in his way buyers drive sock prices up, while sellers drive hem down. This simple principle does indeed work in he financial markes, bu wha deermines he supply and demand for a given financial insrumen is quie nonrivial and is ofen imes dicaed by cerain imporan deails of how hese markes are srucured, which se he rules of he game. The purpose of his secion 3 is o elucidae some aspecs of financial markes, in paricular, why here exiss demand for socks and bonds, ha is, why invesors are willing o allocae heir funds in hese financial insrumens. Nonrivial, and perhaps even conroversial, issues arise in his regard as here is no fundamenal law of naure ha would dicae ha any of hese insrumens should exis in he firs place. Le us begin wih bonds. There are various ypes of bonds wih differen feaures, and we will no aemp o describe hem all in deail; raher, we will focus on hose ha mos bonds have in common. A bond is an obligaion where he issuer of he bond promises o he purchaser o pay back he so-called face or par value of he bondorsomeoheramounasomelaerimecalledmauriyofhebond. Typically bonds also make periodic (mosly annual or semi-annual coupon paymens o he purchaser. Basically, he issuer of he bond borrows money from he purchaser and makes a promise ha a mauriy his money will bereurned o he purchaser along wih some addiional amoun, some of which migh be paid before mauriy, which 3 This secion (wih minor modificaions appeared some number of years ago as a sandalone aricle in he online magazine Kvali.com. 6

8 is essenially he ineres he purchaser earns. Thus, consider a simple example where a bond, which maures in exacly one year, has a face value of $1,. The purchaser pays his amoun now o acquire he bond, and he issuer promises o pay back $1, a mauriy (ha is, in one year from he purchase dae plus $5 as a one-ime coupon paymen, which is also paid a mauriy. The purchaser s invesmen of $1,, herefore, has 5% annual reurn or yield. Noe ha if for some reason he price o purchase such a bond wen up o, say, $1,5, hen he corresponding yield would go down o 4% (assuming ha he coupon paymen is fixed, while if i dropped down o, say, $5, hen he corresponding yield would go up o 1%. Thus, he higher he price he lower he yield, and vice-versa. Bonds, being obligaions, are ypically relaively low risk invesmens. However, hey do bear some risk, in paricular, credi risk afer all, he bond issuer can someimes defaul, ha is, declare bankrupcy, in which case i migh no always be possible o receive he originally invesed amoun as well as some or all of he promised coupon paymens. Bonds issued by governmens of sable counries such as U.S. Treasury bonds are virually risk free governmen deb is a very low risk invesmen because i is backed by heaxaion power of hegovernmen. 4 Indeed, if he governmen deb is no unreasonably high, he governmen can exercise is abiliy oincrease axesopaydownisdeb. Municipal bondsareissuedbysaeandlocal governmens, ypically o raise money for developing local infrasrucure (building roads, hospials, ec.. Sae issued bonds can also be backed by he axaion power ofasae. InheUniedSaesineresearnedfromsuchbondsisexemp fromsae axes, albei Federal axes mus sill be paid on such ineres income. Sae issued bonds, herefore, ypically have lower yields han oher comparable bonds (wih he same credi risk his is because oherwise i would be more advanageous o inves ino Sae issued bonds han in he comparable bonds as he former earn ineres axed a a lower rae, so increased demand on such bonds would drive heir prices up, and, consequenly, yields down, unil i is no longer more advanageous o inves in he Sae issued bonds over he comparable bonds. Oher Municipal bonds, such as hose issued by local governmens, usually bear higher risk as(a leas parially hey are ypically backed by fuure reurns of he invesmen for which he money is raised by issuing he bonds. For insance, if a own needs o build a new hospial, o raise required funds i could issue bonds backed by fuure reurns from he hospial. However, no all such underakings are always successful, hence higher risk associaed wih such bonds. Higher risk bonds ypically have higher yields. This is an example of a more general principle higher risk invesmens should have higher expeced reurns. Indeed, if one could enjoy he same reurn from a lower risk invesmen as from a riskier one, one would clearly end o choose he former. Since he demand for lower risk invesmens would hen be higher han for heir higher risk counerpars, he price one would end up paying for a lower risk invesmen would also be higher, while he corresponding yield would be lower. 4 Noneheless, S&P s downgrade of he U.S. credi raing from AAA (ousanding o AA+ (excellen on Augus 5, 11 is a fac! 7

9 Pu anoher way, he raio of he reurn over he associaed risk should generally be approximaely he same for all invesmens or else he supply and demand paradigm will evenually make sure ha i is. No only various governmens bu also privae secor corporaions can issue bonds o raise money o develop a new produc, open a new facory plan, ec. Corporae bonds have higher yields as hey are riskier han governmen issued bonds heir credi risk is higher. Corporae bonds are backed by he abiliy of a corporaion o generae earnings from sales of producs and/or services, so if he business is no doing oo well, he credi raing or he corporaion goes down, he prices of is bonds also go down, and he yields go up. Since corporaions can defaul, he abiliy of heir bond holders o collec a leas porions of heir original invesmens in he case of bankrupcy is imporan. In fac, corporae bond holders are he firs ones in line o parially if no compleely ge heir money back from he proceeds of liquidaion of he corporaion afer is defaul. The sock holders, on he oher hand, have lower prioriy in he liquidaion process and may receive nohing even if he bondholders are compleely or parially compensaed. Socks and corporae bonds are differen in many more ways han he one jus menioned. When a corporaion issues bonds, i borrows money from bond holders, ha is, is ousanding bonds coun oward is deb. There is an alernaive and somewha easier way for a corporaion o raise money i can issue sock. There are wo main ypes of sock, preferred sock and common sock. The preferred sock can roughly be hough of as a hybrid beween a corporae bond and he common sock. Inhe following we will mosly focusonhecommon sock, and forhesake of breviy we will omi he adjecive common. Le us, however, menion ha, once he corporaion defauls, in he liquidaion process bond holders, preferred sock holders and common sock holders are compensaed wih he decreasing prioriy. Ousanding sock is no a form of corporae deb, in paricular, socks are no obligaions, hey have no mauriy, and he corporaion does no promise o pay back he sockholders heir originally invesed amoun any ime laer. Insead, sockholders or shareholders are owners of he corporaion in he proporion o he oal sock issued by he corporaion. Some of his sock, which is called reasury sock, can be owned by he corporaion iself. In fac, he oal value of he corporaion, which is referred o as is marke capializaion, is deermined by he number of issued shares muliplied by he curren marke price of one share. The laer, in urn, depends on he free marke supply and demand levels for he shares of he corporaion. I is imporan o noe ha socks can and do become undervalued or overpriced in he free marke, and he reasons for his are manifold. We will reurn o his poin once we discuss some of he facors ha are expeced o deermine wha he fair price of a given sock should be. So, wha compels invesors o allocae heir funds in socks? Thus, unlike bonds, socks do no pay coupons, ha is, shareholders do no earn ineres. Some socks do pay dividends, however. Typically he annualized sock dividend is a low single digi percenage of he curren sock price. Wheher he sock pays a dividend is 8

10 decided by he corporae governing body (he board of direcors, and he amoun of dividend can be changed (including o paying no dividend a all wihou he shareholders approval. For insance, if he business is no doing oo well, he corporaion may decide o no longer pay ou dividends. This usually will resul in a decline in he sock price as he demand for he sock mos likely will decrease. Even hough shareholders do no earn ineres, do no essenially have any guaranees as o recovering heir invesmen in he fuure, and may no even be paid any dividends, hey are (parial owners of he corporaion. This ownership eniles hem o cerain righs such as a righ o voe for various corporae decisions including elecing he board of direcors. Also, if anoher eniy (such as anoher corporaion inends o acquire he corporaion, he curren sock holders can voe for or agains such a akeover depending on wheher i is in heir ineress or no. This is one of he key reasons why some invesors are willing o become shareholders. Thus, imagine ha a corporaion is doing well, and has good revenues as well as earnings. If, for some reason, he marke price for is shares is unreasonably low, anoher eniy could buy enough shares in he open marke and aemp a hosile akeover of he corporaion each share gives his hosile eniy one voe, and all i needs is 51% of he voes for a successful akeover. This migh no be in he ineress of he corporaion, which includes is board of direcors, who are ypically shareholders hemselves, is officers as well as all oher shareholders. The board of direcors, which is expeced o ac in he ineress of a leas mos shareholders (afer all, i was eleced by he majoriy of shareholders voes, in his case is likely o decide ha he corporaion should buy back some of he ousanding shares in he open marke, which will ulimaely resul in an increase in he sock price. This buy-back mechanism hen is expeced o ensure ha he sock price grows as he revenues and more imporanly earnings of he corporaion grow he corporaion mus pay cash o buy back some of is ousanding shares, and he abiliy o do so is direcly linked o is earnings. Thus, i is he earnings of he corporaion ha are expeced o deermine he price for is shares. Therefore, if an invesor believes ha he corporaion has srong fundamenals, i.e., he abiliy o generae earnings in he fuure, he or she migh decide o become a shareholder. Generally, such an invesmen bears higher risk han a comparable bond invesmen. Thus, a ypical sock price has annual volailiy, which is a measure of how much i flucuaes, of 3-35%, while bonds usually have volailiy in he 5-7% range. (These figures can vary depending on he economic cycle. Since socks are higher risk invesmens, hey should have adequaely higher reurns, and hisorically on average his indeed appears o be he case. As we already menioned, even hough he sock marke sysem has worked over many decades, i is by no means perfec. Thus, corporaions are expeced o buy back heir sock if is price falls oo low, bu here is no acual law or rule ha hey mus do so. If such a rule were in place, corporaions would be much less inclined o exaggerae heir earnings. Thus, imagine ha a corporaion had o buy back some of is ousanding sock according o is repored earnings levels (say, in some 9

11 proporion o earnings per share. If i exaggeraed is earnings, he corporaion would hen have o buy back more ousanding sock (and a a higher price as he marke demand on is sock would be arificially inflaed, ha is, he corporaion would have o pay more cash han if i repored is earnings correcly. This would clearly be difficul o do if he corporaion did no acually have he cash. The lack of such a rule (or an analogous regulaion migh be (a leas parially or indirecly conribuing ino sock marke bubbles. Thus, many of he new inerne companies during he.com boom never inended o buy back heir sock, and he sock prices soared o more han unreasonably high levels as many invesors were being heir money on he fuure poenial of hese companies o generae earnings, which was ofen imes exaggeraed by he companies hemselves wihou any eviden srong fundamenals presen a he ime. In fac, in many cases socks rade a prices ha facor in a poenial for growh, and no jus he curren earnings levels. Someimes such opimisic bes do no pay off, and he invesors bear losses. On he oher hand, many companies do mee or even ouperform invesors expecaions (ypically hese are companies wih srong fundamenals, in which case such invesmens pay off well. Anoher imporan poin is ha he sock marke does no like uncerainy. If, for insance, here is a possibiliy ha he economy migh no do well in he neares fuure, or, say, here could be a war and is oucome is somewha uncerain, many invesors end o ge ou of heir sock posiions, which can someimes lead o panic selling, and sock marke crashes. Thus, he sock marke senimen goes a long way, and sock prices are subsanially affeced by wha various invesors hink a any given ime. This is parly responsible for he fac ha socks are more volaile han some oher financial insrumens such as bonds. This volailiy makes he sock marke game raher exciing, a leas for some invesors. In some sense sock marke is analogous o foreign currency exchange corporaions are like counries, and socks are like heir currencies. Trading socks is hen like reallocaing funds beween differen currencies. However, his resemblance does no go all he way here are imporan differences as well. Thus, converible currencies are backed by reserves of he counries as well as by laws ensuring ha hey can be used o purchase goods, services, ec. For insance, all U.S. Federal Reserve Noes (ha is, cash regardless of denominaion have he following crucial saemen on heir faces: This is legal ender for all debs, public and privae. This saemen is backed by he U.S. Federal law. Sockholders do no enjoy such a privilege you canno exchange socks for a bowl of soup a a local deli, you mus firs sell hem on a naional sock exchange for cash! There are many rules and regulaions ha sock markes mus follow. These rules have been evolving by learning from he pas experiences as well as o ensure ha invesors ineress are mos adequaely proeced from poenial fraud, marke manipulaion, misinformaion (such as exaggeraed corporae earnings, ec. The sock marke is an imporan ingredien of he free marke economy. And here is a fine line beween regulaion and overregulaion; i s a balancing ac. 1

12 4 Arbirage Pricing SupposewehaveasockS andacashbondwihconinuouslycompounded 5 consan ineres rae r. Le he sock price a ime = be S. Consider a forward conrac, where one of he wo paries agrees o sell he oher he sock a some fuure ime T (which is known as expiry/delivery dae/mauriy of he conrac for he srike price k on which hey agree now, ha is, a =. The forward price is acually independen of he sock movemens beween = and = T, and is given by: k = S exp(rt. (9 The reason for his is arbirage. Generally, arbirage is a mechanism for making correc marke prices, known as arbirage pricing. In is idealized form arbirage means ha, if he price of somehing is no correc, i.e., i is no priced according o arbirage pricing, here is a risk-free way of making profi. 6 Thus, suppose a bank was offering a forward wih a srike price k > S exp(rt. Then a = we could borrow S dollars by selling cash bonds, and purchase one uni of sock. A ime T we could sell our sock o ha bank for k dollars, repay our deb, which is now S exp(rt, and make a risk-free profi of k S exp(rt dollars. Nex, suppose a bank was offering a forward wih a srike price k < S exp(rt. Then a = we could sell one uni of sock, and buy S worh of cash bonds. A ime T our bonds are worh S exp(rt, and we could buy one uni of sock from ha bank for k dollars, hence making a risk-free profi of S exp(rt k dollars. So, now ha we have figured ou he arbirage pricing for our forward, we come o he simples example of wha is known as hedging, which is invesing o reduce he risk of adverse price movemens in a given asse. Typically, a hedge consiss of aking an offseing posiion in anoher asse. So, suppose a bank eners ino he above forward conrac o deliver he sock a mauriy T a he srike price k = S exp(rt. To hedge is exposure o adverse price movemens of he sock, 5 As menioned in he previous secion, usually bonds pay coupons annually or semi-annually. Coninuous compounding wih consan ineres rae r means ha, if we have $1 a ime, a ime +, where is small, i earns addiional r dollars in ineres, and his occurs coninuously. The ne resul is ha $1 a = urns ino exp(r dollars a ime. The reason why ineres exiss in he firs insance is because of he ime value of money: ypically, barring deflaion, $1 oday is worh more han $1 a year from now. The fundamenal reason for his is relaed o economic growh and he fac ha invesing, e.g., in businesses is expeced o generae reurns which is one reason why ineres raes are low when he economy is bad. More prosaically, he ime value of money can be raced o human moraliy and he fac ha ime is he mos valuable commodiy as i is in finie and raher shor supply for each individual human being all he eerniy nowihsanding. 6 The real life usually is much rickier han he idealized form of arbirage. There are many hings ha can go wrong in reaping his risk-free profi, making i no so risk-free. Furhermore, in real life here are ransacion coss, which are ignored in he argumen below. Even if here was risk-free profi o be made on paper, in real life such profi could be reduced o breaking even or even loss by ransacion coss. In fac, some people make money by essenially exclusively becoming a ransacion cos o ohers rading, an example being noorious high frequency raders. 11

13 which could increase in price by he ime T, he bank would borrow S dollars worh of cash bonds a = and buy he sock a price S wih ha cash. A ime T he bank delivers he sock o he oher pary of he forward conrac, collecs k dollars from said pary, and pays off is deb, which is worh exacly k dollars a ime T because of he accrued ineres. The bank breaks even. Bu banks are for-profi organizaions, hey are no in he business of breaking even. So, how does a bank make money in his paricular example? Jus as he bookmaker, he bank mus charge a premium o make money. So, he effecive srike price in he forward conrac mus be k > k, and he bank makes profi equal he difference k k (in realiy, less any oher ransacion coss, such as hose associaed wih purchasing he sock, and any coss of carry and/or oher expenses he bank has o pay is employees salary, ren, ec. which we will no delve ino here. The difference beween k and k may be srucured as a commission or some oher way in he acual forward conrac. To he oher pary o he conrac, he difference beween k and k is hen basically a ransacion cos. As menioned above, in many cases profi is made in he form of ransacion cos, one way or anoher. Forwards are he simples forward-looking conracs. Complexiy is added once derivaives such as call and pu opions are considered. We will discuss hese in more deail in subsequen secions. Here we simply define he simples of such conracs o moivae furher developing he mahemaical machinery in he subsequen secions. A European call opion is a righ (bu no obligaion o buy a sock a he mauriy ime T for he srike price k agreed on a ime =. The claim for he call opion f c (S T,k = (S T k +. Here (x + = x if x >, and (x + = if x. By he claim we mean how much he opion is worh a mauriy T. If he sock price a mauriy S T > k, hen heopionholder gainss T k (excluding he cos paidforhe opion a =. If he price a mauriy S T k, hen here is no profi o be made from he opion as i makes no sense o exercise i if S T < k (as i is cheaper o buy he sock on he marke and i makes no difference if S T = k all his is assuming no ransacion coss. Similarly, a European pu opion is a righ (bu no obligaion o sell a sock a he mauriy ime T for he srike price k agreed on a ime =. The claim for he pu opion is given by f p (S T,k = (k S T +. To undersand how o price hese and oher derivaives, we need some more mahemaical ools. 5 Binomial Tree Model One such ool is he binomial ree model. A ime = he sock price is S. A ime = δ he sock price can ake wo values: S + and S. A = he bond is worh B, and a ime = δ i is worh B exp(rδ. Suppose we have a clam f, which a ime = δ akes wo values f + and f according o he sock price. 7 We can synhesize his derivaive as follows. Le 7 Here he claim f is compleely arbirary and can correspond o he mos exoic derivaives imaginable. The discussion below is compleely general. 1

14 (φ,ψ be a general porfolio of φ unis of sock S and ψ unis of he cash bond B. Furher, le so ha we have φs + +ψb exp(rδ = f +, (1 φs +ψb exp(rδ = f, (11 φ = f + f S + S, (1 ψ = B 1 exp( rδ S +f S f + S + S. (13 Thus, if we buy his porfolio a =, we will guaranee he correc oucome for he derivaive. The price of his porfolio a ime = is given by V = S φ+b ψ = S f + f S + S +exp( rδ S +f S f + S + S. (14 In he case of a forward we have f = S k, so ha V = S exp( rδk, (15 which vanishes for k = S exp(rδ as i should according o he arbirage pricing. In fac, he above price for a general derivaive f is precisely he arbirage price. This can be seen as follows. Suppose a bank was offering o buy or sell he derivaive for a price P less han V. We can buy he derivaive from ha bank, and sell he (φ,ψ porfolio o exacly mach i wih a ne profi V P. A he mauriy ime he derivaive would exacly cancel he value of he porfolio (which replicaes he claim f regardless of he sock price. So we are making a risk-free profi V P. Similarly, if a bank was offering he above derivaive a a price P > V, we could sell his derivaive o ha bank, and buy he (φ,ψ porfolio. A he end of he day we have a risk-free profi P V. The hedge in replicaing he claim f a ime = δ is in ha one purchases he (φ,ψ porfolio a =, which reproduces he claim f no maer wheher he price goes from S a ime = o S + or S a ime = δ. Pu differenly, arbirage and hedging are wo sides of he same coin. 5.1 Risk-neural Measure We can rewrie he price V as V = exp( rδ[qf + +(1 qf ], (16 where q S exp(rδ S S + S. (17 13

15 The se Q {q,1 q}is called he risk-neural measure. The fac ha q > follows fromhe fac ha oherwise we have S exp(rδ S < S +, which would guaranee unlimied risk-free profi by selling he cash bond and buying sock a =. On he oher hand, we also have q < 1 as oherwise we have S < S + S exp(rδ, which would guaranee unlimied risk-free profi by selling he sock and buying he cash bond a =. Tha is, arbirage pricing requires ha S < S exp(rδ < S +. Thus, as we see, he price of he derivaive is given by he expecaion of he discouned 8 claim exp( rδf wih respec o he risk-neural measure Q: V = V = B B 1 T f Q, (18 where he mauriy ime T = δ. The above resuls are sraighforwardly generalized o he case of a binomial ree wih muliple ime-icks. Saring from he las ime-ick we can reconsruc he claim f a earlier imes via where The rading sraegy is given by: The price of he derivaive is given by f now = exp( rδ[qf up +(1 qf down ], (19 where Q is he corresponding risk-neural measure. q = exp(rδs now S down S up S down. ( φ = f up f down S up S down, (1 ψ = B 1 now [f now φs now ]. ( V = B B 1 T f Q, (3 5. An Example: Baseball World Series Suppose eams play a series of up o (n+1 games hink Baseball World Series wih 7 games in which he firs eam o win (n + 1 games wins he series and hen no oher games are played. Suppose ha you wan o be on each individual game in such a way ha when he series ends you will be ahead $1 if your eam wins he series, or behind by exacly $1 if your eam loses he series, no maer how many games i akes. How much would you be on he firs game? 8 Inuiively, we can undersand why he expecaion is of he discouned claim and no he claim iself from he ime value of money argumen: he claim f is a a fuure ime = T, whereas V is compued a he presen ime =, so we mus discoun he claim o arrive a is curren worh. 14

16 This can be hough of as a derivaive pricing quesion. Indeed, we can view he series as a binomial process wih he known claim a he end of he series. Thus, o solve his problem we can draw a binary ree and work backwards. Le us pu + if our eam wins, and pu if our eam loses. We will pu a he roo of he binary ree (he beginning of he series. The longes branches of he ree have (n + 1 nodes (corresponding o all (n + 1 games played, he node before he las one having n + s and n s, no maer in wha order. If, however, (n+1 + s or s occur before (n+1 games, he corresponding branch is shorer as he series ends. For us i will be convenien o have all branches of he same lengh (ha is, conaining (n + 1 nodes. To achieve his, we will coninue a erminaed branch so ha i has (n+1 nodes, and a he las nodes pu he claim of +$1 or $1 depending upon wheher (n+1 + s or (n+1 s occurred firs in his branch. Nex, noe ha we can confine our aenion o only a half of he binary ree, say, he half ha corresponds o our eam winning he firs game indeed, he oher half is he same as his half up o exchanging + s and s. So, our runcaed ree will now have branches of uniform lengh conaining (n + 1 nodes, and he firs node has + in i, which corresponds o our eam winning. Le X be he be we made on he firs game. Then his is exacly how much money we have in he firs node of he runcaed binary ree (where our eam won he firs game. Thus, we can view X as he value of he claim f(f 1, where i = 1,,...,(n+1 numbers he game, while F i is a paricular filraion (or hisory up o he ih game. Thus, F 1 = {+}, F = {++},{+ }, and so on (we are focusing on he runcaed ree. In paricular, X = f(f 1. On he oher hand, we also know ha f(f n+1 = +$1 if in F n+1 (n+1 + s occur firs, and f(f n+1 = $1 if F n+1 (n+1 s occur firs. Thus, we would like o deduce he iniial value of he claim from he known final values of i so his is indeed a pricing quesion. To deermine X, we do no acually need he deails of he underlying marke insrumens we are rading o replicae he final claim. All we need is he riskneural measure Q. The elemens of his measure are all 1/, in paricular, hey are independen of he acual probabiliies for our eam o win or lose a any given ime (assuming ha hey are neiher nor 1. Indeed, suppose a any given ime we purchase a be for Y dollars (by holding he zero ineres rae cash bond shor Y dollars. If our eam wins, we ge Y dollars back (he reward of Y dollars plus he sake reurned. If our eam loses, we ge nohing back. This implies ha he risk-neural probabiliy for his be is indeed q = 1/. Now we can immediaely wrie down he value of he claim a ime i = 1: X = f(f 1 = f(f n+1 Q = ( n 1 (n! k!(n k! ($1 ǫ k. (4 k= Here (n! k!(n k! (5 15

17 is he number of k + s we can place in n slos in an arbirary order (here we are aking ino accoun ha o specify F n+1 we only need o specify he las n enries as he firs enry is always + for he runcaed ree, and ǫ k = +1 if k n, while ǫ k = 1 if k < n. We hen have: X = (n! $1. (6 n (n! Thus, for n = we have X = $1, for n = 1 X = $5, for n = X = $75/, for n = 3 X = $15/4, and so on. 6 Maringales A filraion F i is he hisory of a sock (or some oher process up unil he ick-ime i on he ree. A claim X on he ree is a funcion of he filraion F T for some horizon ime T. The condiional expecaion operaor Q,Fi is defined along he laer porion of pahs ha have iniial segmens F i. A previsible process φ i is a process on he ree whose values a any ick-ime i depend only on he hisory up o one ick-ime earlier, F i 1. A process M i is a maringale wih respec o a measure P and a filraion F i if M j P,Fi = M i, i j. (7 Noe ha for a maringale is expecaion is independen of ime: ha is, i has no drif. 6.1 The Tower Law Le X = X T be a claim. Then he process is a P-maringale. This follows from he ower law: X P,Fj M j P = M j P,F = M, (8 N j X P,Fj (9 P,F i = X P,Fi, i j. (3 To prove he ower law, le us represen a filraion F i as follows: F i = {ǫ 1,...,ǫ i }, (31 16

18 where ǫ k = ±. Le he probabiliy of he pah saring from he even corresponding o F i and ending wih he even corresponding o F j, i j, be P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j. Then we have: N j P,Fi = P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j N j = ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j P ǫ1,...,ǫ j (ǫ j+1,...,ǫ T X T = ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j ǫ j+1,...,ǫ T ǫ i+1,...,ǫ T P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j P ǫ1,...,ǫ j (ǫ j+1,...,ǫ T X T = ǫ i+1,...,ǫ T P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ T X T = X P,Fi = N i. (3 Here we have used P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ j P ǫ1,...,ǫ j (ǫ j+1,...,ǫ T = P ǫ1,...,ǫ i (ǫ i+1,...,ǫ T. 6. Maringale Measure Le S be he sock process, and B be he cash bond process. Define he discouned sock process Z i B 1 i S i. Le us deermine he maringale measure Q for Z. Under he maringale measure Q we have Z j Q,Fi = Z i, i j. (33 Noe ha by Z i on he r.h.s. we mean he value of Z i corresponding o he filraion F i. Le his value be denoed by Z (F i. In paricular, Z i+1 Q,Fi = Z (F i. (34 Le F i = {ǫ 1,...,ǫ i }, and F ± i+1 = {ǫ 1,...,ǫ i,±}. Then we have Z i+1 Q,Fi = Q Fi (+Z (F + i+1 +Q F i ( Z (F i+1 = On he oher hand, we have (34. Thus, we have Q Fi (+Z (F + i+1 +[1 Q F i (+]Z (F i+1. (35 Q Fi (± = Z (F i Z (F i+1 Z (F ± i+1 Z (F i+1. (36 This deermines Q Fi (ǫ i+1. We can now deermine all he oher Q-probabiliies. Thus, Q Fi (ǫ i+1,ǫ i+ = Q Fi (ǫ i+1 Q Fi+1 (ǫ i+, (37 and so on. 17

19 Finally, le us rewrie he Q-probabiliies in erms of values of S. Le us assume ha B i = B exp(r i, i+1 i δ. Then we have Q Fi (± = exp(rδs (F i S (F i+1 S (F ± i+1 S (F i+1, (38 which is a formula we have derived earlier for he risk-neural measure. Tha is, he risk-neural measure is he maringale measure. 6.3 Binomial Represenaion Theorem Suppose we have a binomial ree wih wo processes S and N. Then we have N i = φ i S i +k i, (39 where N i N i N i 1, S i S i S i 1, and boh φ and k are previsible processes. To show his, consider a paricular filraion F i 1. Le S (F i 1 S, S (F ± i S ±, and similarly for N. Then S i akes wo values S ± S, and N i akes wo values N ± N. Le φ i = N + N S + S. (4 Noe ha φ i is previsible by definiion. We mus now show ha k i is also previsible. To do his, le us show ha k (F + i = k (F i : k (F + i k (F i = [(N + N φ i (S + S ] [(N N φ i (S S ] = (N + N φ i (S + S =. (41 This implies ha k i is indeed previsible. Indeed, a he node i, k i is independen of ±, herefore i depends only on F i 1. Now suppose ha boh S and N are Q-maringales. Then k i is idenically zero. Indeed, since boh φ i and k i are previsible, we have However, N i Q,Fi 1 = φ i S i Q,Fi 1 +k i. (4 N i Q,Fi 1 = N i Q,Fi 1 N i 1 Q,Fi 1 = N i Q,Fi 1 N =, (43 and similarly for S i. This hen implies ha k i. Thus, for any wo Q-maringales S and N we have N i = φ i S i, (44 where φ i is previsible and plays he role of a discree derivaive. This leads o he binomial represenaion heorem for Q-maringales: N i = N + i φ k S k. (45 k=1 18

20 6.4 Self-financing Hedging Sraegies Before going ino he deails of self-financing hedging sraegies, le us menion ha in finance one can ake a long posiion, e.g., by purchasing a sock, and a shor posiion, which means ha one owns a negaive number of shares of he sock o be covered a some laer ime. Wih a long posiion, if he sock price goes up, he posiion has a gain, and if he sock price goes down, he posiion bears a loss. Wih he shor posiion i is he opposie, if he sock price goes up, he posiion bears a loss, and if he sock price goes down, he posiion has a gain. To ake a long posiion, one needs o borrow money o buy sock. When aking a shor posiion, one receives he cash value equivalen o he price of he shored sock a he ime or shoring. In real life here are ransacion coss associaed wih his, e.g., he ineres rae a which he received cash accrues ineres when he sock is shored is ypically lower han he ineres accrued on he borrowed cash when a long posiion is aken. Below we ignore any such discrepancies and ransacion coss and consider he idealized siuaion where long and shor posiions are reaed on an equal fooing. Le us consruc a hedge for he claim X = X T on he sock S in he presence of he cash bond B i. Firs, le us define he discouned sock process Z i B 1 i S i, and he discouned claim Y T B 1 T X T. Le E i Y T Q,Fi. (46 Noe ha E i is a Q-maringale. Moreover, E T = Y T, so a he end of he day E i replicaes he discouned claim Y. Le Q be he maringale measure for Z. Then here exiss a previsible process φ such ha E i = E + i φ k Z k. (47 k=1 The previsible process φ is deermined from Nex, define he following previsible process: φ i = E (F + i E (F i S (F + i S (F i. (48 ψ i = E i 1 φ i Z i 1. (49 Finally, define a porfolio Π i = (φ i+1,ψ i+1 consising of holding φ i+1 unis of sock and ψ i+1 unis of he cash bond a ime i. This porfolio is worh V i = φ i+1 S i +ψ i+1 B i = B i E i. (5 If we hold his porfolio across he nex ime-ick, i is worh V i = φ i+1 S i+1 +ψ i+1 B i+1. (51 19

21 Now (noe ha V i+1 is he worh of he porfolio Π i+1, whereas V i is he worh of he porfolio Π i by he ick i+1, V i+1 V i = [φ i+ φ i+1 ]S i+1 +[ψ i+ ψ i+1 ]B i+1 = [φ i+ φ i+1 ]S i+1 +[E i+1 φ i+ Z i+1 E i +φ i+1 Z i ]B i+1 = [φ i+ φ i+1 ]S i+1 +[ E i+1 φ i+ Z i+1 +φ i+1 Z i ]B i+1 = [φ i+ φ i+1 ]S i+1 +[φ i+1 (Z i+1 Z i φ i+ Z i+1 +φ i+1 Z i ]B i+1 = [φ i+ φ i+1 ]S i+1 +[φ i+1 φ i+ ]Z i+1 B i+1 =. (5 Tha is, he value of he porfolio Π i by he end of he nex ime-ick, ha is, by ime i + 1 is precisely he same as ha of he porfolio Π i+1. So we can sell he porfolio Π i a he end of his ime-ick, and buy he porfolio Π i+1 wihou any loss or gain. The worh of he final porfolio Π T is V T = B T E T = B T Y T = X T. (53 So his hedging sraegy replicaes he claim X a he mauriy ime T. On he oher hand, noe ha he price of he porfolio Π is given by V = B E = B B 1 T X Q. (54 This is he arbirage price for he claim X a ime =. 6.5 The Self-financing Propery Le us ake wo arbirary previsible processes φ i and ψ i, and compue he value of he corresponding Π i porfolio: V i = φ i+1 S i +ψ i+1 B i+1. (55 In general he change in his value over one ime-ick is given by: V i V i+1 V i = φ i+1 S i + ψ i+1 B i +φ i+1 S i +ψ i+1 B i, (56 where φ i+1 φ i+ φ i+1, and ψ i+1 ψ i+ ψ i+1. The self-financing propery means ha V i = φ i+1 S i +ψ i+1 B i, (57 ha is, he change in he value of he sraegy is solely due he changes in he sock and bond values, i.e., here is no cash flowing in or ou of he sraegy a any ime. The condiion for he sraegy o be self-financing is hen φ i+1 S i + ψ i+1 B i =. (58 This condiion is saisfied by he sraegy discussed in he previous subsecion.

22 7 Discree vs. Coninuous Models Thus far we considered a binomial ree model, which is discree. While numerically one ofen deals wih discree models, such as binomial/rinomial rees, ec., here is cerain advanage o considering coninuous models. One advanage of coninuous models is ha cerain calculus mehods can be applied, analyic compuaions are more sreamlined, and he inuiive undersanding is more easily developed. This is analogous o he difference beween he pre-newonian physics and a much more sreamlined Newonian descripion based on coninuous mehods and calculus. Consider he following discree model: B = exp(r, (59 S +δ = S exp(µδ+σǫ δ, (6 where ǫ = ±1 wih he equal probabiliies: P(ǫ = 1/ (r,µ,σ are assumed o be consan. I.e., ime akes values in a semi-infinie discree se = kδ, k [,. Le X δ /δ 1 k= ǫ kδ. (61 Noe ha X is nohing bu a random walk on a discree binomial ree. The quaniy X akes values wih binomial disribuion. As δ, X becomes a normal random variable 9 wih mean zero ( X = and variance 1 ( X X = 1 his is he Cenral Limi Theorem. The sock can hen be wrien as S = S exp(µ+σ X. (6 So ln(s is normally disribued wih mean ln(s +µ and variance σ. Le us compue he maringale measure Q. We have: q = S exp(rδ S +δ S + = exp([r µ]δ exp( σ δ +δ S +δ exp(σ δ exp( σ = δ [ 1 1 δ µ+ 1 ] σ r +O(δ. (63 σ Noe ha his measure is independen of. Under his measure we have X Q = /δ 1 δ ǫ kδ Q = k= δ (q 1 = µ+ 1 σ r +O( δ, (64 σ 9 Meaning, is disribuion is Gaussian. 1

23 and X Q X Q = δ /δ 1 k= [ ] ǫ kδ Q ǫ kδ Q = 4q(1 q = 1+O(δ. (65 Thus, ln(s is now normally disribued (w.r.. he maringale measure Q, ha is wih mean ln(s +(r 1 σ and variance σ. This implies ha ( S = S exp σ Z + [r 1 ] σ, (66 wherez isnormallydisribuedwihmeanzeroandvariance1under hemaringale measure Q. 7.1 Brownian Moion Consider he discree process z /δ 1 δ ǫ kδ, (67 where ǫ = ±1, and P(ǫ = 1/. In he limi δ his is Brownian moion. The variable z is normally disribued wih mean zero and variance : P(z, = 1 exp ( z (68 π is he probabiliy disribuion for z a ime. The formal definiion of Brownian moion is as follows: The process W = (W : is a P-Brownian moion if and only if: W is coninuous, and W = ; under P he value of W is disribued as a normal random variable N(, of mean and variance ; he incremen W s+ W s is disribued as a normal N(, under P, and is independen of F s, ha is, of he hisory of wha he process did up o ime s. Le us ask he following quesion: wha is he probabiliy ha saring a z = he Brownian moion z defined above his z by ime T? Wihou loss of generaliy we can assume ha z. Le us firs consider he case where z >. Then our probabiliy is k= P(z = & T : z = z = P(z = & T : z = z & z T z + P(z = & T : z = z & z T z. (69 Noe, however, ha P(z = & T : z = z & z T z = P(z = & T : z = z & z T z. (7

24 Indeed, saring from z a = i is as probable ha we end up wih z T z as wih z T z. Thus, we have P(z = & T : z = z = P(z = & T : z = z &z T z. (71 Nex, noe ha P(z = & T : z = z & z T z = dz P(z = & z T z = exp ( z πt T z, (7 so ha dz P(z = & T : z = z = exp ( z z πt T. (73 For z his probabiliy goes o 1. 8 Sochasic Calculus A sochasic process X is a coninuous process (X : such ha X = X + σ s dw s + where σ and µ are random F-previsible processes 1 such ha µ s ds, (74 [ σ s + µ s ] ds (75 is finie for all (wih probabiliy 1. In he differenial form we have dx = σ dw +µ d. (76 Given a process X, here is only one pair of volailiy σ and drif µ ha saisfies (74 for all. (This uniqueness comes from he Doob-Meyer decomposiion of semimaringales. If σ and µ depend on W only via X (ha is, if σ = σ(x, and µ = µ(x,, where σ(x, and µ(x, are deerminisic funcions, we have which is a sochasic differenial equaion (SDE. dx = σ(x,dw +µ(x,d, (77 1 A coninuous F-previsible process φ s is defined as a process which a ime s is known given he filraion F s, i.e., φ s = φ(f s, so φ s is a funcional of he filraion F s. 3

25 8.1 Iô Calculus We can hink of Brownian moion W as a limi δ of he process Consider he incremen The coninuous version of his is given by: This implies ha In paricular, This implies ha if hen W /δ 1 δ ǫ kδ. (78 k= δw W +δ W = ǫ δ. (79 dw = ǫ (d 1/. (8 (dw n = (ǫ n (d n/. (81 (dw = d. (8 dx = σ dw +µ d, (83 (dx = σ d+o(d3/. (84 This has imporan consequences. Thus, consider a funcion f(x,. We will denoe parial derivaives w.r.. x via a prime: x f(x, f (x,. (85 Then we have (we keep only erms of order dw and d: df(x, = f (X,dX + 1 f (X,(dX + f(x,d = [ σ f (X,dW + µ f (X,+ 1 ] σ f (X,+ f(x, d. (86 As an example consider he funcion Then we have So a soluion o he SDE is given by f(x = exp(x. (87 [ ( df(x = f(x σ dw + µ + 1 ] σ d. (88 ds = S [σ dw + µ d] (89 [ S = S exp σ s dw s + ( µ 1 ] σ d. (9 Noe he difference beween he drif µ in he SDE (89 and in he exponen in (9, which is shifed by σ /. 4