WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 636/92
|
|
- Justina Bates
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 636/92 IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to section 17 of the Workers' Compensation Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. W.11. AND IN THE MATTER OF an action commenced in the Ontario Court (General Division) at the City of Toronto as Action /90. E T W E E N: GARRY ROBBINS Applicant in this application and Defendant in the Ontario Court (General Division) of Ontario Action. - and - FELICE MINNITTI Respondent in this application and Plaintiff in the Ontario Court (General Division) of Ontario Action. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 636/92
2 IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to section 17 of the Worke Compensation Act. AND IN THE MATTER OF an action commenced in the Ontario Court (Gene Division), at the City of Toronto, as Action No /90. B E T W E E N: GARRY ROBBINS Applicant/Defendant - and - FELICE MINNITTI Respondent/Plaintiff WORKERS' COMPENSATION ACT SECTION 17 APPLICATION
3 WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 636/92 This Section 17 Application was heard on September 14, 1992, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: J. Sandomirsky: Vice-Chair, K.W. Preston : Member representative of employers, S. Shartal : Member representative of workers. THE SECTION 17 APPLICATION This Section 17 Application arises out of a lawsuit filed at Toronto in the Ontario Court (General Division) as Action No /90. The Applicant, Garry Robbins, is the Defendant in this action. He seeks a declaration pursuant to section 17 of the Workers' Compensation Act (the "Act") that the right of action of the Plaintiff, Felice Minnitti, the Respondent in this application, is taken away by the Act. The Applicant/Defendant is represented by R.A. Besunder from the law firm Paroian, Raphael, Courey, Cohen & Houston. The Respondent/Defendant is represented by M. Chykaluik from the law firm Ecclestone, Chykaluik, Hamer, Poisson & Neuwald. THE EVIDENCE The Panel marked as exhibits the Applicant and Respondent Section 17 Statements and a copy of Mr. Robbins' employment file. We heard oral evidence from Mr. Minnitti and B. Sanderson the field service manager for Office Equipment Limited ("O.E."), Mr. Minnitti's employer at the time of the accident. We also heard submissions from Mr. Besunder and Mr. Chykaluik. THE NATURE OF THE CASE The Applicant and Respondent were involved in a motor vehicle accident on February 10, At the time of the accident both Mr. Robbins and Mr. Minnitti were employed by Schedule 1 employers. The issue before the Panel is whether they were in the course of their employment at the time of the accident. THE PANELS REASONS (i) The evidence for the Applicant Mr. Robbins was not present at the hearing. Mr. Besunder advised the Panel that Mr. Robbins had no personal interest in the matter as he was not injured and the insurer was handling the case.
4 2 Mr. Besunder reviewed Mr. Robbins' evidence from the Examination for Discovery which took place on June 5, According to that evidence, Mr. Robbins was employed by Dubois Chemical as a sales representative in The documents on his employment file establish that, although he worked as a commissioned salesman, he was an employee of Dubois. He sold soaps, detergent and cleaning supplies to restaurants. His working hours were between eight and five and he did some service calls during the evenings. He was not required to call in to the office at the end of the day. He testified that on the day of the accident, he was prospecting for new accounts. In other words, he was driving around looking for restaurants to drop into to try to sell his products. He did not recall if he went home after the accident or kept looking for restaurants to visit. Mr. Robbins testified that he kept a list of the restaurants he solicited. This list was turned into the company every week. Mr. Robbins was driving his own car. He was responsible for the payment of all expenses on that car. The employer did not reimburse him for any of the costs of operating the vehicle. (ii) The evidence for the Respondent Mr. Minnitti was employed as a field service technician for O.E. His job involved servicing copier machines. Mr. Minnitti described his working day to the Panel. He left his home in Oshawa before 8:00 a.m. and phoned the dispatcher at O.E. when he reached Toronto to get his first service call of the day. After he finished each job he filled out an invoice, phoned the dispatcher and received his next job assignment. His hours of work were roughly 8:30 to 5:00 Monday to Thursday and 8:30 to 4:00 on Friday. According to the evidence of Mr. Minnitti and Mr. Sanderson, the hours varied somewhat depending on the length of time it took to complete the last call. If the call went beyond the end of the working day, the service technicians started later or left earlier the next day. Similarly, if there was a half hour or so left in the work day after a call, and there was not enough time to take another call, the service technicians were was free to go home. Mr. Sanderson testified that, with this type of flexibility, it generally worked out that the service technicians put in their full work week without overtime. O.E. did not pay service technicians for overtime work. The accident occurred on a Friday at approximately 3:30 p.m. Mr. Minnitti had just completed a service call on Eglinton Avenue West and, as it was close to the end of the working day, he proceeded home to Oshawa. He did not call the dispatcher after finishing this service call as he assumed it was the last call of the day. At the time of the accident he was traveling north on Avenue Road to reach Highway 401. Mr. Minnitti was driving a car owned by O.E. He testified that O.E. paid for gas and maintenance of the car. He kept all the tools necessary to do the service work in the car. He also used the car for personal use in the evenings and on week-ends.
5 3 Mr. Sanderson reviewed the computer printout showing Mr. Minnitti's contacts with the dispatcher on February 10 and 13, The printout shows that Mr. Minnitti called the dispatcher on February 10 at 2:12, arrived at his assignment on Eglinton Avenue at 2:45 and completed the assignment at 3:30. The invoice for the service call confirms confirms that the job was completed at 3:30. (iii) The Panel's findings Section 10(9) of the Act bars all lawsuits between two workers of Schedule 1 employers provided that they were in the course of their employment when the accident occurred. Therefore, the issue before the Panel is whether Mr. Robbins and Mr. Minnitti were in the course of their employment at the time of the accident on February 10, Counsel for the parties provided us with a number of Tribunal decisions on the meaning of the phrase "in the course of employment" and its application in similar fact situations. In reviewing these cases, we note that the Tribunal has generally adopted the prevailing rule that travel to and from a fixed work place is not considered to be within the course of employment. However, in cases where a worker does not have a fixed place of employment, and his or her work requires traveling from place to place, different considerations apply. In these cases the Panel must consider whether the worker was involved in an activity reasonably incidental to his employment duties. The evidence in this case is that Mr. Minnitti had completed his work activities at the time of the accident and was on his way home. He testified that, as the job on Eglinton Avenue was completed at 3:30, he assumed that was his last assignment for the day. Mr. Sanderson confirmed that Mr. Minnitti was not required to call the dispatcher at 3:30 on a Friday afternoon. Although the official quitting time was 4:00, a service technician was allowed to go home if he finished a call early. As service technicians were not paid overtime, the extra time compensated for other days when a service call kept the technician beyond the official quitting time. Mr. Minnitti was supplied with a company car. All gas and maintenance was paid by the O.E. However, he also used the car for his personal activities. The mere fact that a worker was using a company vehicle at the time of an accident does not in and of itself put him in the course of his employment. There must be something about the nature of the activity for which the car is used to establish the employment nexus (see Decision No. 382/92, June 12, 1992). In this case the Panel finds that at the time of the accident, Mr. Minnitti was not in the course of his employment. We conclude that the predominate nature of Mr. Minnitti's activity was personal. He was driving home after having completed his days work. Section 10(9) bars a lawsuit where both workers were in the course of their employment at the time of the accident. Therefore, having found that Mr. Minnitti was not in the course of his employment at the time of the accident, there is no need to determine whether Mr. Robbins was in the course of his employment.
6 4 THE DECISION The application is denied. DATED at Toronto, this 8th day of April, SIGNED: J. Sandomirsky, K.W. Preston, S. Shartal.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 106
DECISION NO. 106 IN THE MATTER OF an action commenced in the Supreme Court of Ontario, as Action No. 50-85; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to Section 15 of the Workers' Compensation Act,
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94
WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1015/94 This appeal was heard by conference call between Toronto and Thunder Bay on December 1, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: J.P. Moore:
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1842/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1842/14 BEFORE: J. P. Moore : Vice-Chair M. Christie : Member Representative of Employers M. Ferrari : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationDECISION NO. 4/92. Commutation (vehicle purchase).
DECISION NO. 4/92 Commutation (vehicle purchase). The worker was awarded a 15% pension for an upper back condition resulting from his employment as a security guard. He had previously received a partial
More informationDECISION ON EXPENSES
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: BRADLEY MICHAEL MULHALL Applicant and WAWANESA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON EXPENSES Before:
More informationWCAT WCAT. Legal Action Guide. Section 257 Certificate. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal. Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal
WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal Section 257 Certificate WCAT Workers Compensation Appeal Tribunal This (Section 257 Certificate) answers questions you may have as a defendant or plaintiff/claimant
More informationAND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c. 17; AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT CLAIMS FUND.
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, section 268 and REGULATION 283/95 AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c. 17; AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN: MOTOR
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99. Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1387/99 Pensions (lump sum) (calculation) (discount rate). The worker suffered a back injury in 1989 for which he was granted a 10% pension in 1990. The worker requested payment as
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1119/09 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: June 3, 2009 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 8, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [X] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: [X] (Employer) and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL
More informationAND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c. 17, as amended; CT DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY. - and - LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY DECISION
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c. 17, as amended; AND IN THE MATTER of an Arbitration between: Appearances: Scott W. Densem
More informationSUMMARY. Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1731/99 Earnings basis (seasonal employment); Earnings basis (period of unemployment). The worker appealed a decision of the Appeals Officer regarding the earnings basis for calculation
More informationHONDA CANADA SUSPENSION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND PENDING SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING
HONDA CANADA SUSPENSION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND PENDING SETTLEMENT APPROVAL HEARING This Notice relates to a certified class action in Kathleen Thorpe v. Honda Canada Inc., Q.B.G. No.
More informationCAR ACCIDENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAR ACCIDENT GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction... 1 First Step... 1 Finding and Hiring a Lawyer... 1 Financial Arrangements... 2 Your Claim... 3 Documenting Your Claim... 5 Parties to the Claim...
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1574/99R2
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1574/99R2 BEFORE: E.J. Smith: Vice-Chair M. Christie: Member Representative of Employers D. Broadbent: Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationNOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS
NOTICE TO MONEY CONCEPT (BARRIE) CLIENTS OF EITHER DAVID KARAS OR JAMES STEPHENSON INVOLVED IN LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS NOTICE OF CERTIFICATION AND MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL This is a court authorized
More informationCase Name: Trainor v. Barker
Page 1 Case Name: Trainor v. Barker Between Patricia Trainor, David Bruce Trainor, Carl Phillip Trainor and Deanna Rachael Trainor by her litigation guardian Patricia Trainor, Plaintiffs, and Aaron Gary
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97. Suitable employment.
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 143/97 Suitable employment. The worker slipped and fell in January 1992, injuring her low back and hip. She was awarded a 28% NEL award for her low back condition. The worker appealed
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 940/05
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 940/05 BEFORE: J.P. Moore: Vice-Chair HEARING: At Toronto on May 19, November15, and November16, 2005. Oral DATE OF DECISION: May 29, 2006 NEUTRAL
More informationLiability is admitted
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Date 20080222 Docket M062030 Registry Vancouver Between Sakina Jah Plaintiff And Sik L Cheung Defendant Before The Honourable Madam Justice Bennett Oral Reasons
More informationPROCEDURES FOR PLAINTIFFS IN CIVIL CASES
PROCEDURES FOR PLAINTIFFS IN CIVIL CASES I. INTRODUCTION: If you cannot resolve your differences with another individual or company, then you may consider pursuing your legal remedy by filing a civil lawsuit.
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1292/05
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1292/05 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair D. McLachlan: Member Representative of Employers R.J. Lebert: Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationWorkers Compensation - An Appropriate Method to Calculate the Average Weekly Wage
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BESSEMER DIVISION GREGORY PILKERTON Plaintiff, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: CV 10-276 COOL TEMP, INC., a corporation or other business entity and A,B,C, and D,
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2395/13 BEFORE: A.G. Baker: Vice-Chair HEARING: December 27, 2013 at Toronto Written DATE OF DECISION: May 9, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014 ONWSIAT
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 46854/2009 DATE: 29/04/2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE REPORTABLE: YES/NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2001 ONWSIAT 2499 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 398 01 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on February 16, 2001 by Tribunal Vice-Chair E.J. Sajtos. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
More informationIntroduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum:
Introduction Page to the Appellant s PDF Factum: Note: When you bind your factum, all pages (except for the cover and index) starting with your chronology, should always be on the left-hand side. The righthand
More informationRe: Refusal to Register pursuant to subsection 18 (1) of the Private Career Colleges Act, 2005 (the Act )
Ministry of Training, Ministère de la Formation Colleges and Universities et des Collèges et Universités Private Career Colleges Branch Direction des colleges 9 th Floor, Mowat Block privés d'enseignement
More informationYour Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,
More informationIf you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement. A federal
More informationELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG14722983 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
ELMWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF BERKELEY ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. RG14722983 MUTUAL This Release and Settlement Agreement ("AGREEMENT") is entered into by and between Defendant
More informationVIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
More informationNY PIP Rule Revisions
NY PIP Rule Revisions Effective February 1, 2009 Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) has worked in collaboration with the New York State Insurance Department and the Loss Transfer Committee to incorporate revisions
More informationCase3:12-cv-01377-SI Document89-1 Filed10/09/13 Page1 of 12. A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you are a current or former owner or lessee of
More informationFD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW:
FD: ACN=1004 ACC=R FD: DT:D DN: 609/87 STY:PANEL: Thomas; Robillard; Jago DDATE:23/07/87 ACT: 40(3) [old 41(2)], 40(2)(b) [old 41(1)(b)] KEYW: Temporary partial disability (level of benefits); Availability
More informationIN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MTWCC 13. WCC No. 2015-3545 CAR WERKS, LLC. Petitioner. vs. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND
IN THE WORKERS COMPENSATION COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MTWCC 13 WCC No. 2015-3545 CAR WERKS, LLC Petitioner vs. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND Respondent/Third Party Petitioner vs. JAMES E. GAWRONSKI
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, SETTLEMENT HEARING AND RIGHT TO APPEAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE ROYAL DUTCH/SHELL TRANSPORT SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 04-374 (JAP) (Consolidated Cases) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1025/94 This appeal was heard in Toronto on December 5, 1994, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: R.E. Hartman : Vice-Chair, G.M. Nipshagen: Member representative
More informationS.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth
S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth Historically, at common law, a plaintiff was not obliged to accept a structured settlement,
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2005 ONWSIAT 1489 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 627/05 [1] This appeal was heard in Ottawa on April 1, 2005, by a Tribunal Panel consisting of: B. Alexander: Vice-Chair,
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Appellant: [*] (Worker) Participants entitled to respond to this appeal: The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board) APPEAL DECISION Representatives:
More informationDEFENDANT'S ARBITRATION DISCOVERY REQUESTS PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS. IDENTITY OF PLAINTIFF(s) WITNESSES
,, Plaintiff vs. Defendant IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF McKEAN COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION NO. CD 20 DEFENDANT'S ARBITRATION DISCOVERY REQUESTS PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS These discovery requests
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE October 22, 2007 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE October 22, 2007 Session SHARON P. ADAMS v. CITY OF KINGSPORT, TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court
More informationInstructions for INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION
Instructions for INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION This packet is designed to help you complete an Income and Expense Declaration [FL-150] and it includes a blank Income and Expense Declaration. An Income
More informationDECISION ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: ANDONIETTA ZAYA Applicant and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON A PRELIMINARY
More informationS T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION V DOCKET # 95-0746 OPINION
CLARENCE DeROVEN, PLAINTIFF, 1997 OPINION #261 S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPELLATE COMMISSION AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, INTERVENING PLAINTIFF, V DOCKET # 95-0746 PARAMOUNT
More informationNo. 2007-63-M.P. (05-652) v. : Present: Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, and Robinson, JJ. O P I N I O N
Supreme Court No. 2007-63-M.P. (05-652) William P. McGloin : v. : Trammellcrow Services, Inc. : Present: Suttell, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, and Robinson, JJ. O P I N I O N Chief Justice Suttell, for the
More informationThe two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive
More informationDECISION NO. 94/91. Exposure (asbestos).
DECISION NO. 94/91 Exposure (asbestos). The worker appealed a decision of the Hearings Officer denying entitlement for asbestosis which the worker related to exposure to asbestos when the building in which
More informationSMALL CLAIMS COURT IN ARKANSAS
SMALL CLAIMS COURT IN ARKANSAS Note: The information contained in this publication is designed as a useful guide to remind you of your rights as a citizen of this state. You should not rely totally on
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1617/14 BEFORE: T. Mitchinson: Vice-Chair HEARING: August 29, 2014 at Sudbury Oral DATE OF DECISION: September 4, 2014 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2014
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, s.268, as amended, and REGULATION 283/95;
IN THE MATTER OF THE INSURANCE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, s.268, as amended, and REGULATION 283/95; AND IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION ACT, S.O. 1991, c. 17 as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION;
More informationPLEASE READ THIS NOTICE AND THE ENCLOSED CLAIM FORM CAREFULLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING If You Are a Washington Health Care Provider or a Washington PIP Insured of a USAA Company, and Your Health Care Bills Were Reduced Based on an
More informationDECISION WITH RESPECT TO PRELIMINARY ISSUE
IN THE MATTER of the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I.8, as amended, section 275; AND IN THE MATTER of the Arbitration Act, S.O. 1991, c. 17; AND IN THE MATTER of an arbitration; B E T W E E N : JEVCO
More informationPetitioner, Associated Business Telephone Systems Corporation ( ABTS ), filed a New York City ( City ) Department of Finance
NEW YORK CITY TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION : : In the Matter of the Petition : : DETERMINATION of : : TAT(H) 93-1053(UT) ASSOCIATED BUSINESS TELEPHONE : SYSTEMS CORPORATION :
More informationSUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I. Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement).
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1076/98I Waiver (right to compensation) (settlement). The worker and employer both appealed decisions of the Board regarding ongoing benefits and VR services. After following grievance
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
2001 ONWSIAT 1893 WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 193/00 [1] This appeal was heard in Toronto on September 22, 2000, by Tribunal Vice-Chair N. McCombie. THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, AT JACKSON. July 13, 1999 INTEGON INDEMNITY ) Shelby County Chancery Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, AT JACKSON FILED July 13, 1999 INTEGON INDEMNITY Shelby County Chancery Court CORPORATION, No. 108770-1 R.D. Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellant.
More informationGSX14, GSX16, VSX13, VSX14, GSZ13, GSZ14, VSZ13, VSZ14, GPH, GPC
LIMITED WARRANTY Who Is Providing The Warranty? This warranty is provided to you by Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P. ( Goodman ), which warrants all parts of this heating or air conditioning unit, as
More informationThe CITY OF BAYONNE is soliciting responses/proposals for the provision of the following professional services:
NOTICE POSTED: Decmber 23, 2014 DUE DATE: January 6, 2015 @ 10:00 a.m. prevailing time PUBLIC READING: All responses/proposals will be opened at the City Council Chambers on January 7, 2015 @ 10:00 a.m.
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF HEARING FOR APPROVAL OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Joseph Michael O Neill v. General Motors of Canada Limited Court File No. CV-10-40251500CP PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT
More informationPay Guide - Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2010 [MA000076]
Pay Guide - Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2010 [MA000076] Published 28 June 2016 Pay rates change from 1 July each year, the rates in this guide apply from 01 July 2016. Information
More informationDECISION ON PRELIMINARY ISSUES
BETWEEN: MAURICIO MARIONA Applicant and CANADIAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON PRELIMINARY ISSUES Issues: Mauricio Mariona was injured in a motor vehicle accident on July 17, 1995. He received
More informationMEDICAL-LEGAL MATTERS
MEDICAL-LEGAL MATTERS These fees cannot be correctly interpreted without reference to Preamble Section c, Clause 2. Setting of BCMA Fees - General Considerations The BCMA Fees have been set by the BCMA
More informationThe insurance company is also responsible for reasonable towing or storage charges on your vehicle until you receive written notice otherwise.
If you have been in an automobile accident that is not your fault and your vehicle is damaged, you do have certain rights. If total property damage from the wreck to all damages appears to be over $1,000.00,
More informationbefore the Tribunal. Commissioner Robert J. Firestone did not participate in this Decision.
New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal -----------------------------------------------------------------x : In the Matter of : : DECISION ASSOCIATED BUSINESS TELEPHONE : SYSTEMS CORPORATION : TAT (E) 93-1053(UT)
More informationCrashed your car? Information on claims for damage to your car, in and out of court
Crashed your car? Information on claims for damage to your car, in and out of court 1 After a car accident This brochure will take you through the important steps you need to take if your car is damaged
More informationPersonal Injury Forms (NSW)
Personal Injury Forms (NSW) Form Name Form No. Precedent Code Authorities for Information Authority to Receive Deeds Authority to Receive Hospital Records Authority to Receive Medical Report Authority
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationFrequently Asked Questions About the Honda Odometer Class Action Settlement
Frequently Asked Questions About the Honda Odometer Class Action Settlement The Proposed Honda Odometer Class Action Settlement ( Proposed Settlement ) resolves two lawsuits currently pending in the United
More informationSTATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE DECISION
STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Lynn Santos Mongillo : Complainant vs. : Grievance Complaint #07-0856 Stanley Goldstein : Respondent DECISION Pursuant to Practice Book 2-35, the undersigned, duly-appointed
More informationCase3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12
Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER
More informationand DECISION ON EXPENSES
FSCO A04 000422 BETWEEN: PHILIP SOOBRIAN Applicant and BELAIR INSURANCE COMPANY INC. Insurer DECISION ON EXPENSES Before: Heard: Appearances: January 27, 2006, at the Offices of the Financial Services
More informationHave you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION
Have you or someone you know suffered a personal injury? TIPS TO MAXIMIZE COMPENSATION If you have suffered a personal injury it is important to consider all potential sources of compensation. A personal
More informationDECISION ON A MOTION TO DISMISS
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario BETWEEN: SERGIY ZAPISNOY Applicant and CERTAS DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY Insurer DECISION ON A MOTION TO DISMISS Before:
More informationHomeowner's vs Car Insurer > Subrogation Re: Ontario Car Accident
Friday, April 25, 2014 Page 1 Homeowner's vs Car Insurer > Subrogation Re: Ontario Car Accident The Issue: With homeowner's insurance, if you suffer property damage due to the negligence / fault of someone
More informationCOMMERCIAL WARRANTY. www.daikincomfort.com
COMMERCIAL WARRANTY Who Is Providing The Warranty? This warranty is provided to you by Daikin North America LLC ( Daikin ), which warrants all parts of this heating or air conditioning unit, as described
More informationPRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES
PRIVATE ATTORNEY SERVICES DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT BUREAU OF CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION INTRODUCTION TO BILLING GUIDELINES The Division of Risk Management, Bureau of Claims Administration, (Division) is
More informationNOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL
NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL Applicant: [*] Respondents: [*] et al and The Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia SECTION 29 APPLICATION - PRELIMINARY DECISION Representatives:
More informationQ1: What law regulates the payment of overtime?
Guidance for managing Non-Exempt Staff Q1: What law regulates the payment of overtime? A: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards
More informationDECISION ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE
BETWEEN: TRACY SCHUTT Applicant and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA Insurer DECISION ON A PRELIMINARY ISSUE Before: Heard: Appearances: Joyce Miller Written submissions from both parties were received
More informationClass Action Settlement Notice Long Form Notice From the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Class Action Settlement Notice Long Form Notice From the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio YOU COULD GET MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT RELATED TO THE REMOVAL OF SPARK
More informationEXAMINATION CIVIL PROCEDURE II -- LAW 6213. Section 13 -- Siegel. Spring 2014 INSTRUCTIONS
GWid: EXAMINATION CIVIL PROCEDURE II -- LAW 6213 Section 13 -- Siegel Spring 2014 INSTRUCTIONS 1. This is an open book examination. You may use any written materials that you have brought with you (including
More informationState of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Waukesha County: v. Case No. 2008CF001397. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Results of Blood Test
State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Waukesha County: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008CF001397 Michael Murray, Defendant. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Results of Blood Test Please take notice
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Aliano et al. v. Templeton Rye Spirits, LLC, Case No. 2014-CH-15667 (Cir. Ct. Cook Cnty., Ill.) IF YOU PURCHASED TEMPLETON RYE WHISKEY FROM JANUARY 1, 2006 TO
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH. STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Maureen A. Horgan, Assistant Bar Counsel RE:
~ -- STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE Maureen A. Horgan, Assistant Bar Counsel 287 Main Street Second Floor - Suite Two East Hartford, CT 06118-1885 (860) 568-5157 F ~x
More information****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal
More informationLICENSING AND APPEALS COMMITTEE
LICENSING AND APPEALS COMMITTEE Minutes of a meeting of the Licensing and Appeals Committee of South Norfolk District Council held at South Norfolk House, Long Stratton on Monday 10 January 2005 at 9.30
More informationPRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
More informationCIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION If you received a call on your phone promoting home warranty products from American Residential Warranty ( ARW ) or The Warranty
More information- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Marshall. - and - The Price Partnership Solicitors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 4256 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION Case No: 1HQ/13/0265 1HQ/13/0689 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL BEFORE: Wednesday, 2
More informationOntario Bar Association Conference Pleading Your Causes of Action to Win June 13, 2005
Ontario Bar Association Conference Pleading Your Causes of Action to Win June 13, 2005 Strategies, Approaches and Considerations for a Statement of Claim Richard Bogoroch and Emma Holland* Bogoroch & Associates
More informationCase 2:03-cv-02682-MCE-KJM Document 184 Filed 04/10/08 Page 1 of 5
Case :0-cv-0-MCE-KJM Document Filed 0//0 Page of L ONGYEAR, O DEA American River Drive, Suite 0 Sacramento, California - Tel: --00 Fax: - John A. Lavra, CSB No. Jeri L. Pappone, CSB No. Attorneys for Defendants,
More informationRighting Your New Car s Wrongs
Righting Your New Car s Wrongs Douglas F. Gansler, Attorney General, Maryland Attorney General s Office Your Rights Under Maryland s Lemon Law If your new car spends more time in the repair shop than on
More informationAVOIDING THE PITFALLS WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW YOU NEED TO KNOW FOR YOUR PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE
AVOIDING THE PITFALLS WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW YOU NEED TO KNOW FOR YOUR PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE Presented for the Bar Association Of the City of Richmond February 21, 2001 ".., By: Andrew J. Reinhardt,
More informationHow To Prove Guilt In A Court Case In Texas
CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,
More information