INTRODUCTION TO THE CCC AND THE COUNCIL. July 22, 2015

Transcription

1 INTRODUCTION TO THE CCC AND THE COUNCIL July 22, 2015

2 WHAT WE LL TRY TO COVER Brief history Role and mission of CCC Organizational Details CCC Stakeholders

3 COMPUTING TODAY AND ITS ROLE IN SOCIETY Compu2ng Data Networking

4 COMPUTING TODAY AND ITS ROLE IN SOCIETY Compu2ng People Physical World Data Networking

5 COMPUTING TODAY AND ITS ROLE IN SOCIETY Security Transporta2on Health Privacy Scien2fic Discovery Compu2ng People Physical World Data Networking Societal Compu2ng Manufacturing Robo2cs Smart infrastructure

6 WHAT LED TO THE CCC? In the mid-2000 s, NSF CISE leaders and computing research community leaders had concerns regarding: The Federal commitment to research in general, and to computing research in particular Public and policymaker perception that computer science is yesterday s news Failure to articulate and coalesce around exciting research visions in computer science research visions that would galvanize the public, policymakers, researchers, and students Need to groom leadership for the field Decrease in student interest GENI Project direction

7 A BRIEF HISTORY Established in 2006 as a programmatic committee of the Computing Research Association Initially funded under a cooperative agreement in response to a call from NSF Second Award began in 2012, completed Reverse Site Visit in Spring, 2014 Founding chair Ed Lazowska, co-chair Susan Graham Council and leadership rotation initiated 2013 Hager chair, Mynatt vice-chair since July 2014 Drobnis Executive Director since March 2013

8 THE CCC MISSION The mission of Compu2ng Research Associa2on's Compu2ng Community Consor2um (CCC) is to: catalyze the compu2ng research community and enable the pursuit of innova2ve, high- impact research. CCC conducts ac2vi2es that strengthen the research community, ar6culate compelling research visions, and align those visions with pressing na6onal and global challenges. CCC communicates the importance of those visions to policymakers, government and industry stakeholders, the public, and the research community itself.

9 CCC GOALS Visioning Connec6ng Leadership Communica6on Establish the CCC as a widely accepted catalyst and voice for the compu2ng research community. Bring the compu2ng research community together to envision our future research needs and thrusts. Communicate these challenges, needs and thrusts to the broader na2onal community. Create within the compu2ng research community more audacious thinking. See the ideas developed in the second and fourth points above turned into funded research programs. Workshops and Blue Sky Workshops and Blue Sky Workshops Workshops and workshop CCC ACTIVITIES Workshops and Blue Sky Beth Mynatt July 22, 2014 Workshops White papers reports Workshops Agency engagement LiSPI, Postdocs Council mem Council, visioning leadership CCC Blog, Compu2ng Research in Ac2on CCC Blog Increase the excitement within compu2ng research and use that excitement to aqract students. CI Fellows CCC Blog, Compu2ng Research in Ac2on Inculcate values of leadership and service. CommiQee memberships LiSPI

10 RELATIONSHIP TO COMPUTING RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (CRA) NSF cooperative agreement is with CRA CCC is a programmatic committee of CRA Andy Bernat, CRA Executive Director, is an ex officio member of the CCC Executive Committee Greg Hager, the CCC Chair is a member of the CRA Board of Directors Susan B. Davidson, the CRA chair must consent to CCC Council appointments

11 MORE ON CRA CRA formed over 40 years ago to represent the computing research community Headquartered in DC Members include nearly all research active academic departments, most industrial research laboratories, gov t research laboratories and professional societies CRA's mission is to enhance innovation by joining with industry, government and academia to strengthen research and advanced education in computing. CRA executes this mission by leading the computing research community, informing policymakers and the public, and facilitating the development of strong, diverse talent in the field. CRA works primarily through a committee structure with CRA Board oversight CCC, CRA-W, CRA-E Surveys (Taulbee), Government Affairs, Awards CERP CRA Deans CRA provides support and a community foundation for CCC.

12 ACTIVITIES Visioning Workshops Blue Sky Ideas Conference Tracks Outreach Outputs of Visioning Activities Short Reports / White Papers Task Forces Communicating CCC Blog ( Great Innovative Ideas Computing Research in Action Video Series The Impact of NITRD Symposium Nurturing Next generation of leaders Computing Innovation Fellows (CIFellows) Project Leadership in Science Policy Institute

13 CURRENT ACTIVITIES 2025 Industry Roundtable July 24 th, 2015 Beth Mynatt Engineering Privacy (PbD #3) August 31-September 1 st, 2015 Congressional Fly-in (DC) September th, 2015 Inclusive Access September th, 2015 Liz Bradley Computer-Aided Personalized Ed November th, 2015 Debra Richardson

14 ACTIVITIES Visioning Workshops Blue Sky Ideas Conference Tracks Outreach Outputs of Visioning Activities Short Reports / White Papers Task Forces Communicating CCC Blog ( Great Innovative Ideas Computing Research in Action Video Series The Impact of NITRD Symposium Nurturing Next generation of leaders Computing Innovation Fellows (CIFellows) Project à Postdoc Best Practices Leadership in Science Policy Institute

15 NSF INTERACTIONS CISE Office of the Assistant Director AD: James Kurose Ac2ng DAD: Erwin P. Gianchandani Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (ACI) DD: Irene Qualters Compu2ng and Communica2ons Founda2ons (CCF) DD: Rao Kosajaru DDD: James J. Donlon Computer and Network Systems (CNS) Ac2ng DD: Peter Arzberger Ac2ng DDD: Nina Amla Informa2on and Intelligent Systems (IIS) DD: Lynne E. Parker DDD: Debbie Lockhart Data Algorithmic Founda2ons Computer Systems Research Human- Centered Compu2ng High Performance Compu2ng Communica2ons and Informa2on Founda2ons Networking and Technology Systems Informa2on Integra2on and Informa2cs Networking / Cybersecurity SoZware and Hardware Founda2ons Robust Intelligence SoZware

16 CCC ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Chair, Vice-chair 2 year non-staggered terms Vice-chair is presumptive chair Director, Senior Program Associate, Program Associate Full-time paid positions Executive Committee Chair, Vice-chair, Director 3 at large drawn from Council for 1-year terms CRA Executive Director Council 20 members 3 year terms, at most 2 consecutive terms

17 WHAT DO COUNCIL MEMBERS DO? Shepherd visioning activities Participate in topical subcommittees Examples: Health IT, Sustainability, Robotics, Big Data Develop new activities Examples: CIFellows, LISPI, Post-doc Best Practices Engage with related groups (CISE AC, CSTB, ACM ) Other requests as needed Example: short turnaround white papers Bi-weekly teleconferences Three face-to-face meetings each year

18 WHAT DOES EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE DO? Each member has a major responsibility within the organization Oversees the work of subcommittees and working groups Guides the planning of new activities Oversees the execution of the Strategic Plan Meets weekly by teleconference Meets biweekly with NSF by teleconference

19 THE CCC COUNCIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Greg Hager, Johns Hopkins Univ. (Chair) Beth Mynatt, Georgia Tech (Vice Chair) Liz Bradley, University of Colorado, Boulder Mark Hill, University of Wisconsin, Madison Klara Nahrstedt, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ann Drobnis, Director Andy Bernat, CRA Executive Director

20 THE CCC COUNCIL Terms ending June 2018 Cynthia Dwork, Microsoft Research Kevin Fu, Univ. Michigan Daniel P. Lopresti, Lehigh University Shwetak Patel, Univ. Washington Katherine Yelick, UC Berkeley Terms ending June 2017 Lorenzo Alvisi, UT Austin Vasant Honavar, Penn State Jennifer Rexford, Princeton Debra Richardson, UC Irvine Klara Nahrstedt, UIUC Ben Zorn, Microsoft Research Terms ending June 2016 Liz Bradley, Univ. Colorado Boulder Mark Hill, Univ. Wisconsin Madison Randy Bryant, CMU Limor Fix, formerly Intel Tal Rabin, IBM Daniela Rus, MIT Ross Whitaker, Univ. Utah

21 THE CCC COUNCIL- PAST MEMBERS Greg Andrews, Univ. Arizona Debra Crawford, Drexel Susan Davidson, Univ. PA Joseph Evans, Univ. KS Bill Feiereisen, LANL Stephanie Forrest, Univ. New Mexico Lance Fortnow, Georgia Tech Susan Graham, UC Berkeley Eric Horvitz, Microsoft Research Chris Johnson, Univ. Utah Anita Jones, UVA Frans Kaashoek, MIT Dave Kaeli, Northeastern Dick Karp, UC Berkeley John King, Univ. Michigan Hank Korth, Lehigh Ed Lazowska, Univ. of Washington, CCC Founding Chair Peter Lee, Carnegie Mellon Ran Libeskind-Hadas, Harvey Mudd Andrew McCallum, UMass John Mitchell, Stanford Robin Murphy, Texas A&M Fred Schneider, Cornell Margo Seltzer, Harvard Shashi Shekhar, Univ. MN Bob Sproull, Formally Oracle Karen Sutherland, Augsburg College David Tennenhouse, New Venture Partners Josep Torrellas, UIUC Dave Waltz, Columbia

22 CRA STAFF CCC Director: Ann Drobnis 100% CCC, responsible for day-to-day management of the Organization Senior Program Associate: Helen Wright 100% CCC, responsible for promoting the CCC mission through the website, blog, and social media Program Associate: Khari Douglas ~80% CCC CRA Executive Director: Andy Bernat 20% CCC, responsible for general oversight Other CRA Staff: Peter Harsha, Director of Government Affairs Sandra Corbett Sabrina Jacob

23 CCC AND ITS STAKEHOLDERS

24 ANOTHER STAKEHOLDER VIEW? CS Research Community CCC CCC Research Beneficiaries Research Beneficiaries Research Funders

25 MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS CS research community CRA, CSTB (Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, part of National Research Council), professional societies, academic units, research labs Industry Computer industry, major users of IT Public Government See summary next

26 GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) In White House Executive Office of the President Our primary contacts are Director: John P. Holdren (Harvard) U.S. Chief Technology Officer: Megan Smith Deputy Director for Technology and Innovation: Tom Kalil Assistant Director, Information Technology Research and Development: Randy Bryant (CMU) Assistant Director, Robotics and Cyber-Physical Systems: Richard Voyles (Purdue) Assistant Director, Advanced Manufacturing: Alex Slocum (MIT) Principal Assistant Director for Environment & Energy: Tamara Dickinson

27 GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS 2 President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) Co-chaired by John Holdren and Eric Lander (MIT and Harvard) Members with professional computing-related roles are Susan Graham (Berkeley, CCC) Eric Schmidt (Google) Mark Gorenberg (Zetta Venture Partners) Craig Mundie (Microsoft) Executive Director: Marjory Blumenthal

28 GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS 3 Networking and Information Technology R&D (NITRD) program Legislatively mandated coordination among Federal R&D agencies National Coordinating Office (NCO) facilitates Interagency working groups Coordinating groups Senior steering groups Community of practice Director is Keith Marzullo

29 GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS 4 Agencies important to us NSF strong ties with CISE NIH growing ties with folks interested in Health IT DARPA ties come and go DoE ties with ASCR; interest in ARPA-E Others that are relevant NIST HHS/ONC

30 QUESTIONS?

31 VISIONING

32 CREATING VISIONS FOR COMPUTING RESEARCH The Computing Community Consortium (CCC) solicits proposals that will galvanize the community to define visions and agendas for exciting frontiers of computing research. Create a new community of researchers. Justify a new funding initiative. Help an extant community define a new trajectory.

33 VISIONING PROCESSES Periodic RFP for Community Initiated Activities Historically 3-7 workshops per year Top-down (agency initiated) Bottom-up (open call) Sideways (council initiated, joint with other agencies,.) Robo2cs Spa2al Compu2ng Online Educa2on Privacy R&D Uncertainty in Computa2on

34 SUCCESSFUL VISIONING ACTIVITIES Engage the community and relevant stakeholders Facilitate broad thinking with compelling examples Create new avenues for (interdisciplinary) collaboration Prepare and energize the community for future opportunities Rapidly capture and synthesize ideas from the community. Present ideas and engage possible funders and stakeholders Articulate needs and barriers to research impact Produce tangible products to be used in dissemination efforts: vision statement, summary of key findings, workshop report, slide deck

35 2015 VISIONING ACTIVITIES Extensible Distributed Systems Privacy by Design State of Research and Practice Privacy by Design Privacy Enabling Design Theoretical Foundations for Social Computing Industry Roundtable Privacy by Design Engineering Privacy Promoting Strategic Research on Inclusive Access to Rich Online Content and Services Computer-Aided Personalized Education Privacy by Design Regulation as Catalyst

36 PAST VISIONING ACTIVITIES 2008 Cyber-Physical Systems Summit From Internet to Robotics: The Next Transformative Technology Network Science and Engineering (NetSE) Theoretical Computer Science 2009 Discovery and Innovation in Health Information Technology Cross-layer Reliability (RelXLayer) Global Development Learning Technologies Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) 2010 Advancing Computer Architecture Reseach (ACAR) 2011 Role of Information Sciences and Engineering in Sustainability (RISES)

37 PAST VISIONING ACTIVITIES, CONT Computing for Disaster Management Next Generational Financial Cyberinfrastructre Workshop From GPS and Virtual Globes to Spatial Computing 2020 Computing and Healthcare: New Opportunities and Directions 2013 Convergence of Software Assurance Methodologies and Trustworthy Semiconductor Design and Manufacture (SA+TS) Multidisciplinary Research for Online Education Privacy R&D Workshop (with ITIF) Extreme Scale Design Automation 2 (with ACM) Visions of Theory of Computing (with Simons Institute) Robotics, Automation, and Computer Science (with NSF, OSTP) 2014 Extreme Scale Design Automation 3 (with ACM) Computing Visions 2025: Interacting with the Computers All Around Us (with CISE) Computing Visions 2025: The New Making Renaissance: Programmable Matter and Things (with CISE) Human Computation Roadmap Summit Workshop Aging in Place Uncertainty in Computation BRAIN

38 COMPUTING VISIONS 2025 Joint Venture of NSF CISE Advisory Committee and CCC Articulate future trends and opportunities in computing research. Envision evolution and growth over the next 10 to 15 years. 3 Initial Workshops: Interacting with the Computers All Around Us Looked at how technology could change how computers interface with people and the world around them. The New Making Renaissance: Programmable Matter & Things Explored the way items are designed, programmed, manufactured, and delivered/deployed. Visions 2025 Roundtable Looked at research themes that emerged from the first two 2025 workshops and pulled insights from a number of relevant CCC workshops.

39 WHAT CCC BRINGS TO THIS TABLE Speak with proposers who contact CCC before submitting a proposal Once a proposal is submitted, the Visioning Committee works with proposers to sharpen the idea Full Council reviews proposals, offering suggestions to further strengthen the activity or determine that activity is not feasible (missing the WOW factor) CCC Liaison appointed for each workshop: Becomes part of Organizing Committee Tracks logistics Attends workshop (as an observer) Provides feedback on outputs as they are being produced, and Exerts pressure when outputs are not being produced.

40 THE WORKFLOW Visioning Chair (VC) or delegate iterates with PIs to produce a plausible proposal. Proposal sent to entire CCC. All return short-fuse (i.e. 2 weeks) comments. VC synthesizes feedback and creates the case: yes/no/revise: Includes all reviews, but with identifying information deleted plus a short summary VC sends the case to CCC. VC leads a discussion by CCC of the case. VC sends response to PI s, including anonymized reviews discussion of required changes name of CCC liaison for the case

41 BLUE SKY IDEAS CONFERENCE TRACKS Special Blue Sky Ideas tracks at leading conferences Reach beyond usual papers CCC provides prize money for top 3 papers Papers should be: open-ended outrageous or wacky Present new problems, new application domains or new methodologies Relatively short (4 pages) Published after the conference

42 DETAILS Conference Organizers write a proposal, indicating how papers will be solicited and reviewed Blue Sky Chair and Director read proposals and determine viability Once Track is approved, a CCC liaison is assigned VC Chair or liaison may attend the Conference to present information about the CCC and the awards

43 BLUE SKY IDEAS CONFERENCE TRACKS BuildSys 2012 Computational Sustainability AAAI 2013 Computational Sustainability CHI 2013 Robotics: Science and Systems 2013 Conference on Innovation Data Systems Research (CIDR-2013) Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS-2014) Foundations of Software Engineering (ACM SIGSOFT 2014) Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-15) Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) 2015 Upcoming: Biomedical Data Mining, Modeling, and Semantic Integration BDM Advances in GIS (ACM SIGSPATIAL 2015) Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16)

44 OUTREACH

45 OUTREACH: ROBOTICS 4 meetings during summer 2008 Roadmap published May 2009 Extensive discussions between visioning leaders & agencies OSTP issues directive to all agencies in summer 2010 to include robotics in FY 12 budgets National Robotics Initiative announced in summer 2011 Henrik Chistensen Georgia Tech

46 OUTREACH: BIG DATA

47 OUTREACH: ARCHITECTURE 2010 Josep Torrellas UIUC 2010 Mark Oskin Washington 2012 Mark Hill Wisconsin 2013

48 nsf.gov - Funding - Smart Health and Wellbeing - US National Science Foundation (NSF) OUTREACH: HEALTH IT October 2009 Workshop Computing Community Consortium Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Science Foundation Discovery and Innovation in Health IT Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology National Library of Medicine American Medical Informatics Association National Institute of Standards and Technology Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering SMART HEALTH AND WELLBEING (SHW) CONTACTS See program guidelines for contact information. SYNOPSIS October 2012 Workshop Smart and Connected Health (SCH) (nsf13543) 6/5/13 5:51 AM Information and communications technologies are poised to transform our access to an participation in our own health and well-being. The complexity of this challenge is being Smart by concomitant and Connected transformations Health (SCH) to the fundamental nature of what it means to be health PROGRAM good health SOLICITATION increasingly means managing our long-term care rather than sporadic trea NSF acute conditions; it places greater emphasis on the management of wellness rather tha illness; it acknowledges the role of home, family, and community as significant contribu REPLACES individual DOCUMENT(S): health and wellbeing as well as the changing demographics of an increasingl NSF population; and it recognizes the technical feasibility of diagnosis, treatment, and care b an individual's National Science genetic Foundation makeup and lifestyle. The substrate of 21st century healthcare w computing and networking concepts and technologies whose transformative potential is by unresolved Directorate for core Computer challenges & Information in Science designing & Engineering and optimizing them for applicability in this Division of Computing and Communication Foundations Division of Computer and Network Systems The goal Division of the of Information Smart Health & Intelligent and Systems Wellbeing program is to seek improvements in safe, e efficient, equitable, and patient-centered health and wellness services through innovatio Directorate for Engineering computer and information science and engineering. Doing so requires leveraging the s methods Directorate and for knowledge Social, Behavioral bases & Economic of a broad Sciences range of computing and communication rese perspectives. National Institutes of Health Some illustrative examples are described here. Protecting patient privacy while providi Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development legitimate anytime, anywhere access to health services will require new security and cryptographic National Cancer solutions. Institute Personalized medicine will require advances in information ret mining, and decision support software systems. Continuous monitoring and real-time, c National Human Genome Research Institute feedback on health and behavior will rely on remote and networked sensors and actuat platforms, National novel Institute interactive of Biomedical displays, Imaging and and Bioengineering advances in computing and networking infrast Data collected by sensors, at clinics, and labs need to be anonymized and aggregated National Institute on Aging

49 OUTREACH: 2010 PCAST NITRD REPORT 1/3 of the PCAST NITRD Working Group members were CCC Council Members The report drew extensively on CCC White Papers An excellent roadmap for the field

50 OUTREACH: 2013 PCAST NITRD REPORT ¼ Contributing Members were CCC Council Members An excellent review of progress from 2010 report The challenge now: continuing to translate it into action

51 COMMUNICATING

52 CCC BLOG Top 10 Posts in the Past Year What Computer Science Can Teach Us About Robotics Great Innovative Idea- Machine Teaching Accelerating the Big Data Innovation Ecosystem Capabilities Reincarnated: Compatibility and Better Memory Protection First Person: Life as a NSF Program Director Analysis of Current and Future Computer Science Needs via Advertised Faculty Searches Obama Administration Unveils $200M Big Data R&D Initiative The Algorithm That Runs the World The Future of Computer Architecture Research Big Data and the 2012 Summer Olympics

53 COMPUTING RESEARCH IN ACTION Skin Biophysics Surgical University of Wisconsin- Madison Ubiquitous Compu2ng Lab at the University of Washington SmartGeo at the Colorado School of Mines Vehicle- to- Grid at the University of Delaware Integra2ng Robots with Tac2cal SWAT Teams at Mississippi State University

54 GREAT INNOVATIVE IDEAS Replaced Highlight of the Week Way to showcase Blue Sky Ideas Started April 2015 Once a month Blog post- Highest number of hits

55 NITRD SYMPOSIUM (2/16/2012)

56 NURTURING FUTURE LEADERS

57 LEADERSHIP IN SCIENCE POLICY INSTITUTE (LISPI) To educate a cadre of computing researchers on how science policy in the U.S. is formulated and how our government works November, attendees; 7 women 19 received financial aid Henry Kelly, DoE 24 institutions represented 23 participants from public institutions; 7 from private; 4 from industry; April, attendees; 12 women 6 received financial aid April, aqendees; 5 women 4 received financial aid 27 ins2tu2ons represented 22 from public; 6 from private; 3 from industry 47 institutions represented 40 participants from public institutions; 12 from private; 1 from industry AQendees Milt Corn, NIH

58 CI FELLOWS Computing Innovation Fellows, to keep PhD graduates in the research pipeline during the economic downturn 2009: 60 Fellows, 50 have permanent research positions (33 academic, 16 industry, 1 government) 2010: 47 Fellows, all have permanent positions in research (27 academic, 20 industry) 2011: 20 Fellows, 19 have permanent research positions (15 academic, 3 industry, 1 government) CERP s CI Fellows Evaluation Report April 2014 CI Fellows Workshop May 22-23, 2014

59 CI FELLOWS EVALUATION KEY FINDINGS Compared to Non-fellow Postdocs, CI Fellows Experienced greater independence during their postdoc Were more satisfied with how their postdoc prepared them for balancing work-life responsibilities Received higher postdoc salaries that made it easier to live and relocate Had higher salaries at the time of the survey Postdoc programs in general: Were rated positively in terms of support, opportunities, and skills preparation Could be improved to reduce negative impact of relocating Could be more accommodating of personal and family responsibilities

60 THE CHANGING COMPUTING COMMUNITY Employment of New Ph.D.s in Tenure- Track Faculty, Industry, and Postdoc Posi6ons Source: CRA Taulbee Survey Tenure- Track Faculty Postdocs Industry

61 COMPUTING INNOVATION FELLOWS PROJECT -> POSTDOC BEST PRACTICES Request for Proposals PostDoc Best Practices 9/30/13 11:49 PM Search Request for Proposals (RFP) Implementation of Best Practices for Supporting Postdocs PDF Version In recent years, new PhD s in the CS&E community have increasingly chosen postdoc training assignments in their pursuit of research careers. Large numbers of postdocs in CS&E are a new phenomenon for us. Our community has an opportunity, as a field, to institutionalize a set of best practices, drawn from our own experience and that of postdocs in other fields and to establish a culture that provides postdocs a superb enriching experience that launches their research careers. The Computing Community Consortium (CCC), a committee of the Computing Research Association (CRA), is requesting proposals for research to improve training programs for postdocs in the Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CS&E) community. This RFP seeks proposals to pursue innovations that will make lasting changes to improve the postdoc experience. Innovations

62 POSTDOC BEST PRACTICES 3 Projects began in April, 2014 for 3 years ASCENT: Advancing computer Science Careers through Enhanced Networking and Training Columbia, Cornell, CUNY, NYU, Teacher s College Taking Collective Responsibility for the Postdoc Experience University of Washington A Foundational Model for Postdoctoral Programs in Computer Science & Engineering at Large Universities Arizona State University, with University of Arizona and Northern Arizona University

63 DISCUSSION, QUESTIONS, IDEAS

64 RESEARCH ECOSYSTEM Non- US Ins2tu2ons Research Community The Public Undergrads Masters Research Universi2es PhDs, Postdocs, Papers Industry 4 year colleges and universi2es Na2onal Labs Government

65 CCC ROLES (THUS FAR) Non- US Ins2tu2ons Research Community Events, Web Site etc. The Public Undergrads Masters Research Universi2es CCC Visioning PhDs, Postdocs, Papers Industry CI Fellows 4 year CS Urge colleges and universi2es Workshops White Papers Na2onal Labs Government

66 YOUR IDEAS? What are we doing we might do better/differently? What aren t we doing that we should? Are we missing big pieces of the picture entirely?