1 Shadow Juries Help Lawyers Assess Which Arguments Aren t Working at Trial By Nora Lockwood Tooher Each day of the six-week murder trial of millionaire Charles Durst, four women and one man arrived promptly each morning at the Galveston, Texas courtroom where the trial took place, quietly took their seats in the spectator gallery and began their day s work, Remarkably similar in age, appearance, and occupation to five of the strongest jurors in the case, the spectators listened carefully to both sides opening arguments, viewed exhibits in the case, heard witnesses testimony and closely followed closing arguments. Each day they adjourned to discuss the day s proceedings, and at the end of a trial, when the jury filed out of the courtroom to decide the fate of Durst an eccentric real estate heir who dismembered his neighbor after shooting him the fivesome began their own deliberations in the case. Despite their seemingly passive presence in the courtroom each day, the mysterious spectators played a critical role in helping Durst s attorneys convince the jurors of his innocence, according to the Texas trial consultant Nona Dodson. The five shadowy figures in the case were indeed just that shadow jurors hired by the defense to attend the trial and react to each day s proceedings. Long a secret weapon in trial lawyers arsenals, shadow juries are stepping into the light as a useful tool in trial research. Like mock trials and focus groups, shadow juries give attorneys important insights into how non-lawyers may react to the case themselves, witness presentations and demonstrative evidence. But they do it in real time, through daily feedback that lets the attorneys know how their side is doing in the courtroom. It made a big difference, said Dodson, an associate with Cathy E. Bennett & Associates, a jury consulting firm in Louisville, Texas. There was one lawyer who was kind of loud and in your face, and [the shadow] jurors didn t like that, so we toned him down. Shadow jurors also perceived some tension with the defense team, which the consultant s helped dissipate. The panel also made several negative observations about the defendant s behavior that Dodson and her team were able to correct. For example, shadow jurors noticed that Durst was sitting low in his chair, which they perceived as an attempt to make himself look smaller. While shadow juries remain the least well-known of jury research tools, trial consultants say they can be an invaluable tool in helping lawyers hone their trial presentation.
2 They are very expensive, with total costs averaging $1,000 to $3,000 for each day of trial. That includes payments of $100 to $200 a day to each shadow juror, plus consultant fees for the professionals who analyze their feedback. Costs can run even higher if the consultant has to rent a facility, such hotel conference rooms for nightly de-briefings. Because f their hefty price tags, shadow juries are usually reserved for high-stakes civil and criminal cases. Shadow juries are usually used in bet-the-house, big-time litigation where settlement is an issue, where the stakes are high, where the credibility of witnesses is something to be determinative, said Jason Bloom, a litigation analyst with Courtroom Services in Irving, Texas. They re very expensive propositions and it takes a special kind of case, Dodson agreed. Los Angeles trial consultant Richard Gabriel noted, however, that there are many ways that smaller firms can reduce the costs of shadow juries, including using fewer individuals and limiting the amount of the trial they attend. He added that, despite their costs, lawyers who have used shadow juries say they can be extremely useful in determining whether a tactic, witness or piece of evidence is actually getting across to a group of people similar to the actual jury. Florida trial attorney C. Steven Yerrid agrees that even small firms can make use of shadow juries by using three, two or even just one shadow juror to provide daily feedback on what issues are of concerns to jurors. I find them very effective, said Yerrid, founder of a four-lawyer firm in Tampa, Fla. You don t always have to use it, but at least being exposed to it gives you the opportunity to pick up nuggets that might otherwise remain unmined. Bloom said shadow juries can give lawyers added confidence in their own instinctive impressions. It eliminates the guesswork, he said. A lot of time you see lawyers leave the courtroom after a day of trial either excited or disappointed, but they re really just guessing. It s a reality check, he added. It s a real-time jury research project. Gathering Shadows While each trial consultant has individual methods for organizing a shadow jury, the basic steps are the same. Recruiters, usually from a market research firm, gather a pool of about 30 panelists, and then narrow the group down to anywhere from four to 12 shadow jurors. To control costs, several consultants told Lawyers Weekly USA they generally recommend a panel of four to eight shadow jurors. The shadow jurors should be people who are similar in age, gender, race, education and occupation to jury members who are considered the strongest of the actual jury, based on their occupations, leadership roles or other indications. To ensure they are not influenced in their opinions, the shadow jurors aren t told which side is employing them. During the trial, shadow jurors sit in the spectator gallery, usually separately from each other, rather than as a group. The shadows are spread out so that they are less likely to pass notes and chat with each other, and also so that they appear less conspicuous to actual jurors. Several consultants said they encourage shadow jurors to take notes during the proceedings, so that they have detailed feedback each day of the trial. A facilitator, usually a jury consultant, sits in the courtroom with the shadow jurors. To avoid tipping off the shadows as to who hired them, the facilitator does not speak to the hiring attorneys while the shadow jurors are present. Some consultants inform the court there is shadow jury present, while others leave that decision to their clients. Several consultants told Lawyers Weekly USA they believe the process works better if as few people as possible are aware that a shadow jury is in the courtroom. The most critical aspect of a shadow jury, Dodson said, is that, Shadow jurors only hear what the actual jurors hear. So, when the actual jury is asked to leave the courtroom during the proceedings, the shadow jury also steps outside. Each night, the facilitator debriefs the shadow jurors to get their assessment of the case. Shadow jurors fill out questionnaires and individually answer questions about the trial, such as how attorneys for both sides are doing, how the defendant or plaintiff is coming across, whether the expert witnesses are credible, and whether they understand the themes of the case. The consultant then either turns in a report of meets with the hiring lawyers to discuss the shadow jurors reactions to the day s proceedings. Some lawyers hire shadow juries just for the opening arguments and the first few witnesses so they can get
3 an idea of how the case is starting off. But in high-stakes case, shadow juries sometimes sit through the entire trial, and even deliberate at the end of the trial just as actual jurors do. In the Durst case, the shadow jury deliberated for an hour before finding Durst not guilty, the same verdict delivered four days later by the actual jury. The Shadows Know Ted Donner, a Chicago solo who specializes in business and commercial law for small- and medium-sized businesses, said he finds shadow juries are most useful in long trials. If it s going to be a case that s going to last a few weeks, having a shadow jury can be useful, he said. In a case where the trial lawyers are working until late at night, sleeping in a hotel and rising early, it s easy to lose track of how your case may be coming across to a group of non-lawyers, Donner said. You want to know how it s reading to an audience that s only here during the trial and goes home, he said. That s where shadow juries can be immensely useful, Donner said. When you ve got a lot of evidence in a case, you ve got to be sure that the key points you re going to be hammering in your dosing argument actually came up. For example, shadow jurors may say they don t recall seeing a particular document or piece of evidence. Based on that feedback, the attorney is able to refresh actual jurors memories by asking a witness to look again at an exhibit. Memory is more important than judgment, Donner said. I care a lot less about what they decide from the evidence they hear than I do about whether they actually heard the evidence if they ve gotten the point and they re grappling with it. La Verne Morris, a jury consultant in the Chicago office of Kroll Ontrack-TriaIGraphix, recently had a shadow jury sit through nine months of complex construction litigation in a state court in the Southwest. The exposure level in the case was very high, Morris said. The client was concerned because of the complicated information. [The lawyers] wanted to make sure as they presented their case that it was clear. And also, because of the level of exposure, they wanted to make sure their arguments would resonate. The shadow jury actually helped shorten the proceedings, Morris said. They said they had so much information that Morris s client a plaintiff in the case decided not to put on a rebuttal case. David Graeven, president of San Francisco-based Trial Behavior Consulting, said a shadow jury can help attorneys focus on key factors in a trial, including: Comprehension: Are they understanding our case themes? Expert witnesses: How are our witnesses doing? Attorney performance: They might find one member of a trial team is more effective Client demeanor: How is the client doing at the table? Is the client looking at the jury too much? Risky Business Despite their benefits even proponents of shadow juries say there are risks involved, including: Lawyers may focus too much on the shadow jurors and lose sight of their most important audience the actual jurors. Attorneys may expect a shadow jury to predict the actual outcome of the trial. The actual jurors may figure out there is a shadow jury present and resent their presence. Opposing attorneys may figure out who the shadow juries are and try to intimidate them, thereby tainting the process. In the heat of trial, attorneys can easily become too fixated on responding to shadow jurors daily reactions, Donner said. It s kind of like overnight ratings. If you re hearing from your shadow jurors that they re not believing your expert witness about the economics of the case, there s going to be a tendency to react to that and have the witness focus on the answer that was missing the day before, he said. But by doing so you may be highlighting the shortcomings of your case, rather than paying attention to the big picture, Donner explained. If they re talking about one layer of the case and that s not where your trial theme is, you don t want to fix the bandages on the little problems that come up, he said. You want to get them focused on your theme again. Michael Haggard, a personal injury plaintiff s attorney
4 in Coral Gables, Fla., said he has never used a shadow jury, and described their use as a misplaced science. I would say that you put a lot of energy into an exhibition game, when at the same time you ve got the real game going on, Haggard commented. Even trying to read the actual jury can be a mistake, he noted. Haggard recalled that the jurors in a $104.4 million pool injury case didn t even look at him during his closing argument. Instead, they were focused on a timeline Haggard s team had prepared that showed a series of pool injuries over several decades that were allegedly related to a faulty pool pump. Because the jury didn t make eye contact with him during the dosing argument, Haggard was nervous that the verdict would be unfavorable. But instead, the jury found in favor of his client. As a trial lawyer, you have to go off of what you feel, Haggard said. Defusing Landmines Gabriel, who is president of the American Society of Trial Consultants, conceded that shadow juries have some drawbacks. But, he said, If we can get someone to use it once, chances are they ll use it for a second, third and fourth time. And they re not just for large firms with huge corporate coffers, he said. Smaller firms can amortize the cost of a shadow jury by using it in one case, and then applying the same feedback to similar cases. For example, this would work well in products liability cases, he said. For example, he said, a shadow jury can help attorneys learn how a jury might view an expert witness who will be testifying in several similar cases, such as fenphen lawsuits. The shadow jury may report that the expert witness has an impressive resume, but just doesn t come across as a good communicator, Gabriel said. That gives the trial team a chance to improve the witness s communications skills before the next trial. Although lawyers can reduce costs, by having shadow jurors sit through only a portion of the trial, Gabriel noted that many attorneys find their feedback so useful, they want to hear what verdict they would have delivered in a case. It s very common at the end of the process to conduct a focus group and have them deliberate, Gabriel said. It doesn t do you any good in terms of the trial, because the jury is already deliberating. But, our clients say, We re going to use this in subsequent trials. As for how the shadow jurors verdict compares with the actual jurors, Gabriel said: Although the actual verdict may you can track the issues and find out they track very well. Shadow juries are most often done in conjunction with pre-trial research, but can also be done in lieu of focus groups or mock trials. The difference between shadow juries and pre-mal research is that shadow juries can provide feedback on the innumerable variances in the course of a trial, according to Gabriel. Witnesses may not be doing as well as expected on the stand, or doing better than expected, he said. It s an opportunity for the attorneys to see where the jurors maybe getting confused in the case, what they re focusing on, what they feel is important, what they feel is missing in the case. The feedback enables [the trial team] to make slight adjustments, even in examination, he said. For example, Gabriel said, in a commercial case where the product at issue involves electronic circuitry, shadow jurors may report they don t understand the difference between two electronic circuits the expert witness is testifying about. That gives the trial team the chance to produce a graphic that illustrates the distinction. I think it is the most valuable tool a consultant can offer, Gabriel said. It s real time. Our experience has been that they re fairly accurate, said Daniel Wolfe, a consultant with Kroll Ontrack-TrialGraphix, who has organized about 25 shadow juries over the past 18 years. A shadow jury, he said, is fairly predictive of how jurors will look at certain issues, and ultimately the verdict. Bloom cited one breach of contract case in which his client, the defendant, was very scared of the verdict and was anxiously trying to settle the case. Surprisingly, the shadow jury came back with no liability and zero damages. The general counsel for the defendant had a $40 million check he ripped up, based on the feedback from the shadow jury, Bloom said. Yerrid, the Florida plaintiffs lawyer, had a similar experience with his first shadow jury 20 years ago. He was defense counsel in the case, representing a utility company that had been sued for $63 million by the families of several youths who were seriously injured when their car hit a utility guide wire and flipped over.
5 At the end of the trial, his six shadow jurors deliberated, rendered a verdict for the defense and were a key factor in his decision not the settle the case. The actual jurors soon came back with the real verdict which was also in favor of the defense. Other consultants cautioned, however, that a shadow jury should not be used to predict the outcome of the case. You really have to be careful to tell the clients this is not to predict verdicts, Gabriel said. Clients always ask US how a jury s going to vote. We have to spend time telling them you cannot replicate the exact attitudes and life experiences of the jurors. Instead, he tells them that the feedback from the shadow jury even if it includes a verdict is purely for informational purposes. Given those caveats, he said he tells attorneys that a shadow jury sure gives you a good sense of what the core issues are, and where the landmines are. It s not necessarily to say where the case is going to go, but here are my problems that I better address, Gabriel said.
JUROR S MANUAL (Prepared by the State Bar of Michigan) Your Role as a Juror You ve heard the term jury of one s peers. In our country the job of determining the facts and reaching a just decision rests,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Mock Trial Script The Case of a Stolen Car This mock trial is appropriate for middle and high school students. The script includes a role for a narrator,
CAN JURY CONSULTANTS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE? A Plaintiff s Perspective By: Kathryn Burkett Dickson Dickson Levy LLP 180 Grand Ave., Suite 1300 Oakland, CA 94612 510-318-7706 firstname.lastname@example.org I. Introduction.
Opening Statements Handout 1 Once the jury has been chosen, the attorneys for both sides deliver an opening statement about the case to the jury. Opening statements outline the facts that the attorneys
How to Prepare for your Deposition in a Personal Injury Case A whitepaper by Travis Mayor, Attorney If you have filed a civil lawsuit in your personal injury case against the at fault driver, person, corporation,
VETTING THE EXPERT---YOURS AND THEIRS Too often an attorney will retain an expert on the advice of another attorney or based on a limited amount of time spent searching for the expert. The most important
Common Myths About Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Cases 1 By B. Keith Williams There are several myths about accident cases and the attorneys that handle them. It is important to keep these myths in
SMALL CLAIMS COURT What Is Small Claims Court? Nebraska law requires that every county court in the state have a division known as Small Claims Court (Nebraska Revised Statute 25-2801). Small Claims Court
Attachment No. 2 Proposed Plain Language Revisions to Colorado Criminal Jury Instruction Chapter 1:04 and Chapter 3 The work of the Plain Language Subcommittee is set forth below. For comparison, the redrafted
Scaled Questions During Jury Selection By: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan One of the most crucial tasks a trial attorney must undertake is selecting a pool of jurors that will view her client's case in
Life as a Medical Malpractice Attorney A medical malpractice case lands on your desk. What is your first thought? What is your plan? If you re stumped or not sure where to begin, studying the anatomy of
October 2015 Volume 38 Number 10 chicagolawyermagazine.com Photo by Lisa Predko What do you really know about verdicts and settlements? By Roy Strom T rial lawyers pride themselves on winning over juries.
PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere
Medical Malpractice VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS INTRODUCTION: Tell the jurors that this is a very big and a very important case. Do a SHORT summary of the case and the damages we are seeking. This summary should
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRIMINAL ACTION H-00-0000 DEFENDANT(S) JURY INSTRUCTIONS I. General A. Introduction Members of the Jury:
ROLES TO ASSIGN 1. Judge 2. Courtroom Deputy 3. Prosecutor 1 opening statement 4. Prosecutor 2 direct of Dana Capro 5. Prosecutor 3 direct of Jamie Medina 6. Prosecutor 4 cross of Pat Morton 7. Prosecutor
PEOPLE V. HARRY POTTER THE COURT: Members of the jury, the defendant, Harry Potter, is charged in a one-count information which reads as follows: On or about November 23, 2008, HARRY POTTER, did unlawfully
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA JENNIFER WINDISCH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO: 2007-CA-1174-K JOHN SUNDIN, M.D., RHODA SMITH, M.D., LAURRAURI
Proper Use of Focus Groups in Civil Litigation Rhon E. Jones 1 Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C. Montgomery, Alabama Focus groups are more important to civil litigation than you may think.
CROSS EXAMINATION DEALING WITH CHANGING TESTIMONY: FROM SET UP TO KNOCK DOWN By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Quite often at trial, a witness or a party to an action will offer a different response to
: Crossing the Finish Line First Cynthia R. Cohen, Ph.D. Verdict Success Manhattan Beach, CA THE STARTING LINE: DETERMINING YOUR GOALS Mock trials, often considered expensive because of the professional
The Current Climate For Today s Nursing Home Defendant by Jury awards $20 million in negligence suit against nursing home. Largest verdict in County history, $21.5 million, returned against nursing home.
STEPS IN A TRIAL Note to Students: For a civil case, substitute the word plaintiff for the word prosecution. A number of events occur during a trial, and most must happen according to a particular sequence.
1 Reflecting on Jury Duty I was called last week to be on stand-by for jury duty. I can not complain. I have lived in San Francisco now for six and half years and this was the first time I got called up.
Consumer Awareness How to Keep From Getting Ripped Off by Big Insurance Provided as an educational service by: Anthony D. Castelli, Esq. Concentration in Auto and Work Related Injuries (513) 621-2345 ATTENTION!!!
A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant
Boulder Municipal Court Boulder County Justice Center P.O. Box 8015 1777 6 th Street Boulder, CO 80306-8015 www.bouldercolorado.gov/court JURY READINESS CONFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS You have set your case for
From Classroom to Courtroom JUDGE INSTRUCTIONS The Trial 1. After the bailiff has called the court to order, judge enters courtroom and sits at bench. The judge tells everyone, but the jury, to be seated.
VOIR DIRE FROM THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE BY JAMES C. MORROW MORROW, WILLNAUER & KLOSTERMAN, L.L.C. 44--1 You have been sitting in your chair at counsel table for a good part of the day, perhaps making an
Choosing An Attorney For Your Accident Case By Michael A. Schafer, Attorney at Law 440 South Seventh Street, Ste. 200 Louisville, Kentucky 40203 (502) 584-9511 www.mikeschaferlaw.com CHOOSING AN ATTORNEY
Reptile Theory: A Tail of Two Reptiles Julia B. Semenak If phrases like safety rules and community safety sound familiar, you have likely encountered a plaintiff s lawyer using the strategies set forth
What Happens Next? The Legal Process Roadmap for Personal Injury Cases By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite 1550 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel:
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS I. Purpose of This Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint trial jurors with the general nature and importance of their
Why a Personal Injury Practice Is Different I wrote in the first two editions of this book that starting a personal injury practice is not for the fainthearted. Sadly, that fact is even truer today than
Part I: General Information How was I chosen for jury service? THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE Potential jurors are selected randomly by the jury commissioners using lists designated by the courts, such
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this handbook is to provide answers to some very basic questions that inmates or inmates families might have regarding the processes of the criminal justice system. In no way
You are probably reading this guide because you were recently in an automobile accident. Now you are faced with some difficulties. The tasks of managing your care and your insurance claim can be confusing
IMPROVING SETTLEMENT SAVVY Kathy Perkins Kathy Perkins LLC, Workplace Law & Mediation www.kathy-perkins.com In these difficult economic times, parties may be looking to reduce litigation costs and risk
My detractors on the internet, of which I have many, largely made up of tax lawyers who try to discredit me because I represent a threat their livelihood, and certain people whose ideas on the income tax
Mandatory Arbitration The Alternative To Trial By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law 206-727-4000 Phone: 206-727-4000 Fax: 206-727-4001 email@example.com Copyright 2007 by Christopher Michael
What the Jury Hears in Products Liability Litigation The View From Both Sides and the Middle Theresa Zagnoli, Communications Expert and Jury Consultant Susan T. Dwyer, Defense Lawyer Jeffrey A. Lichtman,
How To Choose A Personal Injury Attorney A Guide to Finding the Right Injury Attorney to Help With Your Personal Injury Lawsuit As an attorney who works regularly on personal injury lawsuits, I know how
Factors Affecting Jury Damages Awards Decisions By Dorothy K. Kagehiro, Ph.D. The use of experts in federal trials has remained fairly consistent across time. In a 1998 survey of 303 United States District
RYAN PACYGA CRIMINAL DEFENSE 333 South 7 th Street, Suite 2850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-339-5844 www.arrestedmn.com More information on the YouTube channel Ryan Pacyga CRIMINAL COURT IN MINNESOTA: Understanding
STEPS IN A MOCK TRIAL 1. The Opening of the Court Either the Clerk of the Court of the judge will call the Court to order. When the judge enters, all the participants should remain standing until the judge
What Do You Do? Developing Your Client-Focused Marketing Messages by Sara Holtz, ClientFocus Imagine you are at a Chamber of Commerce networking event. A man whose name tag identifies him as the President
How to Avoid the Wrong Lawyers for Your Case What You Need to Know about Lawyer Advertising By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite 1550 San
Sexual Assault & The Juvenile Court Process A Guide for Victims/Survivors & Their Families A publication of Connecticut Sexual Assault Crisis Services, Inc. 96 Pitkin Street v East Hartford, CT v 06108
1 THE COURT: You have been selected and sworn to determine the facts and render a verdict in the case of the Commonwealth / 1 of Pennsylvania versus Robert Greene, who is charged with one count of robbery,
Seven Things You Must Know Before Hiring a DUI Attorney Seven Things to Know Before Hiring a DUI Attorney Copyright 2014 SmartWeb Online 1 Introduction Some people don t quite understand the severity of
FREE SPECIAL REPORT WANT TO PROTECT YOUR FAMILY? WHAT YOU ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY HAVE TO KNOW WHEN BUYING CAR INSURANCE. Keep reading to learn What are your chances of having an accident in Kentucky with
Chapter 4 Legal Ethics Yes. You read that right legal ethics. Har de har. Go ahead. Get it out of your system. How about this one? Why do scientists prefer using lawyers over lab rats? There are some things
OPENING STATEMENTS Introduction The opening statement is a most important part of trying a lawsuit. Many lawyers do not treat the opening statement with the importance it deserves. Many opening statements
EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT Publication Date: November 2013 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT In the operation of your child care business you may encounter problems which force you to
TOP TEN TIPS FOR WINNING YOUR CASE IN JURY SELECTION PRESENTED BY JEFF KEARNEY KEARNEY & WESTFALL 2501 PARKVIEW STREET, SUITE 300 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 (817) 336-5600 LUBBOCK CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS
Beyond the Polyester Veil : A Personal Injury Negotiations Case Study I m going to tell you something else almost as useful.i m going to tell you the big secret of handling your personal injury case. For
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 Mock Trial Script: The Case of a Stolen Car SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA-COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 2 Mock Trial Script BAILIFF: All rise. Department One
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES WITH LITIGATION IN MIND Introduction The purpose of this paper is to alert the reader to concepts used in the defense of construction related lawsuits and to suggest how
August 5, 2008 Jury Consulting: Leveraging Social Science Expertise for Successful Voir Dire 2008 Kroll Ontrack Inc. www.trialgraphix.com www.krollontrack.com Slide Materials To download a complimentary
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta Introduction This booklet provides basic information about appearing as a witness in the courts of Alberta. It is designed to explain your role as a witness,
I suggest the following simple ten ways to avoid malpractice in litigation: CONSTRUCTION LAW AND LITIGATION May 2012 IN THIS ISSUE Lawrence J. West gives us a Top 15 List for Preparing the Expert Witness
How to Prepare for Your Civil Trial* IMPORTANT! Remember that the law is always changing. This brochure is not a substitute for talking to an attorney. Civil cases can be complicated, and the judge will
Buyer Beware What You Need To Know About Lawyer Advertising By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law Davis Law Group, P.S. 2101 Fourth Avenue Suite 630 Seattle, WA 98121 206-727-4000 Davis Law Group, P.S.
Current Trends in Litigation Involving the Use of Social Media John B. Kearney Partner and Head, New Jersey Litigation Group Ballard Spahr LLP 1 Introduction Social media now affect all phases of litigation
PROCEDURES FOR PLAINTIFFS IN CIVIL CASES I. INTRODUCTION: If you cannot resolve your differences with another individual or company, then you may consider pursuing your legal remedy by filing a civil lawsuit.
April 2012 LAWYERS NEW ANNOUNCEMENT! Video Studio presents April 2012 Newsletter Gerry s New Book: Secrets of Lawyer Video Marketing in the Age of YouTube I am proud to tell you that I have now finished
A CONSUMER S GUIDE TO A SUCCESSFUL PERSONAL INJURY CLAIM TIPS AND ADVICE TO ENSURE THE BEST OUTCOME FOR YOUR PERSONAL INJURY CASE. MATERIAL PROVIDED BY: DICAUDO & YODER, LLC A CONSUMER S GUIDE TO A SUCCESSFUL
Presentation by: Margaret Pisacano, BSN, JD Director of Risk Management UK Healthcare Basic elements of a medical malpractice claim: DUTY: To act as a reasonably prudent family practice physician under
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 09-00296-03-CR-W-FJG ) ROBERT E. STEWART, ) ) Defendant.
In General: What is a limited action suit? Per chapter 61, Limited Action cases in Kansas are civil cases where the dollar amount does not exceed $25,000.00, unless it is an unsecured debt, in which case
Our Purpose A jury s verdict is based on it s perception of the witnesses and evidence. Understanding jurors attitudes and perceptions about your case can reduce your risks at trial. Our purpose at SheldonSinrich
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA KEYBOARD()DIVISION KEYBOARD(), Plaintiff, v. KEYBOARD(), Defendants. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] CV Members of the Jury: COURT S INSTRUCTIONS
Community Alliance of Tenants Tenant Education Information is for general information purposes only, and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney Small Claims Court Information provided by Oregon
A Seat at the Table: Witness Prep, Trial Examinations and Other Essential Trial Skills for Young Lawyers November 7, 2015 Sponsored by: NAPABA Young Lawyer Network NAPABA Judicial Council NAPABA Litigation
2006 AN OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM OUTCOMES As a result of this lesson, students will be able to: Summarize juvenile court process and procedures Define legal terms used in the juvenile justice
SAN DIEGO DEFENSE LAWYERS 2014 MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES GENERAL INFORMATION 1. The Competition is sponsored by the San Diego Defense Lawyers ( SDDL ). A violation of any of the rules governing
Friday, August 29, 2008 TRIAL ADVOCACY The Art of Jury Selection: Working With Challenges Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan It has been said that the purpose of jury selection is to select a 'fair and impartial'