1 Case :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT DECLARATION OF CAROL A. SOBEL
2 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 McNICHOLAS & McNICHOLAS LLP Matthew S. McNicholas (State Bar No. ) Douglas D. Winter (State Bar No. 0) Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00- Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff KAILYNN G., by and through her guardian ad litem, KANDACE SIMPLIS KANDACE SIMPLIS; KYRA S., by and through her guardian ad litem KANDACE SIMPLIS; and KAILYNN G., by and through her guardian ad litem KANDACE SIMPLIS; KHANDI ROSE, an involuntary plaintiff; DYVONN G., an involuntary plaintiff; DEUJANYE G., an involuntary plaintiff; DAJAYNE G., an involuntary plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, CULVER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF CULVER CITY; CHIEF DON PEDERSEN, in his official and individual capacities; and DOES through 0, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: CV -0-MWF-MANx (Consolidated Case No.: CV -0-JHN-MANx) DECLARATION OF MATTHEW S. McNICHOLAS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES Date: August, 0 Time: :0 p.m. Ctrm: 0 Judge: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
3 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 I, Matthew S. McNicholas, declare as follows:. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all of the courts of the State of California and am a partner at McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP, counsel of record for plaintiff Kailynn G. The matters contained in this declaration are known to me personally, and if called upon to testify as to such matters under oath in a court of law, I could and would do so competently.. I have represented over fifty officers in employment-related matters against various law enforcement agencies, including the Los Angeles Police Department and the Sheriff s Department, and I have spoken with hundreds more concerning potential cases that I ultimately did not take. It is, in my experience, a rule without exception that such cases involve considerable time and labor in order to obtain a successful result for the officer. Whereas in other areas of law, the parties may reach an early settlement, cases against a governmental agency cannot be settled without approval by the City Council, a fact which acts in many instances as a deterrent for plaintiffs attorneys to prosecute such cases and reduces the desirability of such cases.. This case was no exception. Since June, 0, my firm has worked on this matter with a risk of no recovery. Bringing it to a successful resolution required, among other things, the skill and specific institutional knowledge I acquired from representing sworn personnel from patrol divisions throughout greater Los Angeles (which includes people conducting traffic stops, felony stops, and the like), firearms training personnel, air support personnel, bomb squad personnel, K-Unit personnel, SWAT personnel, as well as personnel from clandestine units that track, monitor, and observe other officers. My firm has had to overcome bureaucratic red tape, government hurdles and the pervasive code of silence in order to obtain competent evidence to present at trial, which has led to tremendous insight and knowledge as to
4 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #:0 #: 0 how personnel operate in the field. This was arduous and required perseverance and stamina over more than a decade.. Taking on a case of this nature involves a significant amount of time and precludes me and my firm from accepting other clients.. I have been practicing law for fourteen years and have been associated with McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP since. I clerked for United States District Judge William J. Rea, externed on a full-time basis for United States District Judge John G. Davies, and externed on a full-time basis for Associate Justice Richard Aldrich on the California Court of Appeal. I have been a featured panelist at seminars hosted by Consumer Attorneys Association of California and Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, and am a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates and am currently waiting to be sworn-in to the American College of Trial Lawyers this fall. I have had several articles published and have acted as consultant to several members of print and television media. Currently, I am representing over two dozen sworn personnel in matters against various departments and agencies concerning retaliation, harassment and discrimination all of which requires extensive working knowledge of police departments and police officers.. In 0, I, along with Douglas Winter of my office, tried the matter of Avila v. City of Los Angeles, Case No. CV --SJO (FMOx) (the Avila Matter ), resulting in a jury verdict in favor of our client, Plaintiff Leonard Avila on his claim for FLSA retaliation against the LAPD. As set forth more particularly below, on August, 0, the District Court, Hon. S. James Otero, awarded attorney s fees in favor of Plaintiff in the Avila Matter of approximately $0,000.. In 0, I tried the matter of Romney v. City of Los Angeles, resulting in a verdict of $,,000. As the Court is aware, the Romney matter arose out of the same underlying Maciel trial, in which Romney, like Avila here, was retaliated against for testifying against the LAPD.
5 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0. I tried the matter of Francois v. City of Los Angeles, resulting in a verdict of $,0,000. That case was substantially similar to the instant matter in that it was a retaliation case against the LAPD Bomb Squad.. In April 00, I tried the matter of Melissa Borck v. City of Los Angeles et al., a case involving retaliation and failure to prevent gender harassment by the Los Angeles Police Department that resulted in a jury award of $,,.00 before Judge Hatter.. In 00, I tried the matter of Nagatoshi v. City of Los Angeles, resulting in a jury verdict of $,, Again, the case was similar to the instant matter in that it involved retaliation against a member of the LAPD Metropolitan Division K Unit.. In November 00, I tried the matter of Bender v. City of Los Angeles resulting in a jury verdict of $,0, Once again, the case was similar to the Avila case in that it was a retaliation claim arising out of the plaintiff s support of the lone female LAPD Bomb Detection K handler s reports of harassment.. I also handled Fuller v. City of Los Angeles, on behalf of the female LAPD Bomb Detection K officer whose claims Bender supported. In October 00, that case was resolved in the amount of $,0, I have other substantial results, including, but not limited to: $,000,000 on behalf of a plaintiff against his employer for a brain injury in a single vehicle accident in Chicago; $,00,000 on behalf of special education student against the LAUSD for a one-time sexual assault by another special education student in a school bathroom; $,000,000 on behalf of multiple tenants against their landlord for habitability issues, wherein one young tenant was suffering uveitis leading to partial blindness in one eye; and $,000,000 on behalf of three adult children and their father for the wrongful death of their -year-old mother in San Francisco.
6 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0. In this case, I competently performed necessary work in preparation for trial as well as participated in meetings and strategy for trial. I was lead trial counsel for Plaintiff Kailynn G., and conducted direct and cross-examination of witnesses.. In this matter I spent at least 0.00 hours of my own time (not counting those of my associates). However, this figure does not include numerous telephone conferences, internal meetings conducted and related activities. All of the work undertaken and performed by me on this case was necessary and reasonable.. My reasonable billing rate is $0.00. This is a reasonable rate based upon fourteen years of experience as a plaintiff s attorney, experience as a trial lawyer, the results obtained in jury trials, and my expertise in the area of wrongful termination and retaliation. Moreover, this rate is reasonable because I have recently been retained at rates of $0 per hour and have been awarded fees at an approved hourly rate of $ Specifically, in early 0, I was retained to represent an officer from one of the four largest banks in the United States concerning his employment-related issues and separation from his employer. The representation lasted throughout 0. I was retained on a blended-rate, which included an hourly component and a percentage of the separation package. The hourly rate was $0.00. This was the most recent time I have been retained on an hourly basis. In addition, I have been recently awarded fees with an approved hourly rate of $00.00 in Do Rights Plant Growers v. RSM Equico, Inc., Case No. 0CC00 (0). Previously, in late 0, I was awarded fees with an approved hourly rate of $0.00 in the Romney matter, and was similarly awarded fees with an approved hourly rate of $0.00 in the following cases: Flud et al. v. Spherion Pacific Workforce, LLC, et al., Case No. S-00-CV- SPC (Aug., 0); Jimenez v. Diamond Contract Servs., Case No. BC0 (July, 0); Mendoza v. AKH Company, Inc., Case No. BC (June, 00).
7 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0. Most recently, by Order dated August, 0, the Hon. S. James Otero awarded $,00 in attorney s fees in favor of McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP s prevailing client in a federal FLSA retaliation matter in Avila v. Los Angeles Police Dept., et al., Case No. :-cv-0 SJO (FMOx) - Docket No. 0. Judge Otero s hourly rate determinations were as follows: Matthew McNicholas - $00/hr.; Douglas Winter ( Mr. Winter ) - $00/hr.; Catherine Schmidt - $0/hr.; Alyssa Schabloski - $0/hr.; Cameron Fredman - $0/hr. A true and correct copy of Judge Otero s fee order in the Avila matter is attached hereto as Exhibit. Judge Otero specifically determined that these hourly rates were reasonable based on consideration of each of our attorneys respective experience, prior awards and success, as well as the local legal community. With the exception of a $0/hr. rate increase for me and Mr. Winter, Plaintiff Kailynn G. seeks an award herein based on the same hourly rates as those awarded by Judge Otero last year.. My experience is commensurate with that of a partner at any bluechip law firm such as Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, O Melveny & Meyers, or Latham & Watkins. In fact, I likely have more trial experience than any senior litigator in any of those firms, as evidenced by my membership in the American Board of Trial Advocates. As such, my hourly rate is necessarily on par with that of a senior partner at such a firm defending a discrimination lawsuit on behalf of a corporate client.. I have been assisted in this matter, including in preparation for and at trial, by my associate, Douglas Winter, who joined McNicholas & McNicholas in January, 0. Prior to joining our firm, Mr. Winter was a partner at The Ball Law Firm, LLP (00-0) and at Riley & Reiner (-00). Mr. Winter graduated from U.C. Hastings College of the Law in, and became a member of the California Bar the same year. Prior to beginning his career in private practice, Mr. Winter served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Richard A. Gadbois, Jr.
8 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 0. Mr. Winter has represented clients in a wide variety of litigation matters, and has extensive trial and appellate experience in both state and federal courts. Mr. Winter has successfully tried several cases to decision or verdict, and has been responsible for the successful outcome of significant trademark and copyright litigation at both trial and appellate levels, resulting in published decisions including Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc., F.d (th Cir. 0), and Warner Bros. Entertainment v. X One X Productions, F.d (th Cir. 0).. In this matter, Mr. Winter worked diligently both pre-trial and during trial, and has billed a total of. hours in this case. Included in this amount is the time worked by Mr. Winter preparing the instant motion for fees. All of Mr. Winter s time and professional skills were reasonable and necessary to the successful prosecution of Kailynn G. s case. Mr. Winter s hourly rate is $0.00. Based on Mr. Winter s skill and significant experience, this rate is reasonable and appropriate. Moreover, as discussed above, Judge Otero determined in August, 0 that Mr. Winter s reasonable hourly rate was $00.00 per hour based on Mr. Winter s experience and the prevailing market rates. Further, in 0 and 0, as a partner at The Ball Law Firm, LLP, Mr. Winter customarily charged clients in the range of $00 to $ per hour, depending on the nature of the representation.. Patrick McNicholas prepared for and took the deposition of witness Amanda Medeiros in this matter, expending a total of.0 hours. Mr. McNicholas hourly rate is $00. Mr. McNicholas is a founding partner of McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP and was admitted to the California Bar in after obtaining his J.D. from McGeorge School of Law. Mr. McNicholas has been named a Super Lawyer by Los Angeles Magazine from 00- and a Top 0 lawyer by Superlawyers from Mr. McNicholas is an extremely experienced trial attorney and has won many noteworthy cases, including several multi-million dollar verdicts. Among these successes include a $,00,000 jury verdict in William S. v.
9 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 Bonita Unified School District (molestation by school teacher), a $ million jury verdict in Gray v. The Saxon Group (construction accident), and a $,0,000 jury verdict in Francios v. City of Los Angeles (race discrimination). Mr. McNicholas was recently awarded fees with an approved hourly rate of $0.00 in Do Rights Plant Growers v. RSM Equico, Inc., Case No. 0CC00 (0).. I was also assisted in this matter by my associate, Juan C. Victoria. Mr. Victoria spent no less than.0 hours working on this matter on behalf of Plaintiff Kailynn G. All of Mr. Victoria s time and professional skills were reasonable and necessary to the successful prosecution of Kailynn G. s case. Mr. Victoria graduated from U.C. Hastings College of the Law and was admitted to the California Bar in 00. Mr. Victoria practices in all areas of litigation, including civil rights and personal injury. In 0 and 0, Mr. Victoria was recognized in 0 and 0 as one of the top lawyers under the age of forty in Southern California as listed on the Rising Stars list by Southern California Super Lawyers. Mr. Victoria s hourly rate is $0.00. Based on Mr. Victoria s skill and experience, this rate is reasonable and appropriate. Further, it is reasonable since Judge Otero in August 0 approved a $0.00 hourly rate for Catherine Schmidt, Esq. in the Avila matter (See Exhibit, p. ). Ms. Schmidt and Mr. Victoria have similar background and experience and, until Ms. Schmidt left in early 0 to start her own firm, both were associates together for several years at McNicholas & McNicholas.. I was further assisted in this matter by my associate, Alyssa Kim Schabloski. Ms. Schabloski joined McNicholas & McNicholas in February, 0, after having been an associate with the firm of Michels & Watkins from At the Michels firm, Ms. Schabloski performed plaintiff s contingency litigation work, focusing on catastrophic personal injury and medical malpractice litigation, and her work contributed to the successful resolution of several confidential seven () figure settlements. Ms. Schabloski graduated from U.C.L.A. School of Law with
10 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of Page ID #: #: 0 a joint JD and Masters of Public Health (MPH) degree, and as an American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA) fellow, clerked with the Honorable Victoria Cheney, now an appellate justice at the Second Appellate District Court of Appeals. All of Ms. Schabloski s time and professional skills were reasonable and necessary to the successful prosecution of Avila s case. Ms. Schabloski worked a total of. hours on this matter, at the hourly rate of $0. All of Ms. Schabloski s time and professional skills were reasonable and necessary to the successful prosecution of Kailynn G. s case. Based on Ms. Schabloski s skill and experience, this rate is reasonable and appropriate. Furthermore, as set forth above, Judge Otero determined in August, 0 that $0 per hour was a reasonable rate for Ms. Schabloski based on Ms. Schabloski s experience and the prevailing market rates.. I was assisted in this matter until late 0 by my associate, Cameron Fredman, who joined McNicholas & McNicholas after working in the litigation department at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, where he practiced in the general litigation group and handled cases involving commercial litigation and class actions. He graduated from Loyola Law School magna cum laude and served as Editor-in- Chief of the Loyola Law Review. He served as a full-time judicial extern for the Honorable A. Wallace Tashima at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Mr. Fredman spent 0.00 hours working on this matter. All of Mr. Fredman s time and professional skills were reasonable and necessary to the successful prosecution of Kailynn G. s case. Mr. Fredman s hourly rate is $0.00, which is the same rate Judge Otero determined in August 0 to be his reasonable hourly rate based on his experience and the prevailing market rates.. The successful result in this civil rights case was achieved by Plaintiffs attorneys through diligent and tireless effort, both in the preparing the case for trial and at trial. The work performed by each attorney in furtherance of this action was reasonable and necessary. All of the time was contemporaneously kept and was
11 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 billed was for legitimate, necessary activities such as: () meetings with the client; () drafting pleadings; () preparing for, taking and defending numerous depositions and conducting written discovery; () drafting and opposing motions; () attending court proceedings; () reviewing extensive documentation and evidence; () locating and speaking with witnesses; () preparing pre-trial pleadings, including drafting and opposing numerous motions in limine ; () preparing for trial; and () trial.. The time set forth does not include significant time spent reading and reviewing s, making phone calls, drafting internal memoranda, internal meetings, and various administrative tasks associated with prosecution of a case. As such, the requested time already incorporates a substantial reduction, which I approximate at roughly ten percent (%).. The time described above is accurately summarized in the following table: Attorney Rate Hours Total Amount Matthew S. McNicholas, Esq. $0.00 / Hour 0.00 $,0.00 Douglas D. Winter, Esq. $0.00 / Hour. $,.0 Patrick McNicholas, Esq. $00.00 / Hour.0 $,00.00 Juan C. Victoria, Esq. $0.00 / Hour.0 $,.00 Alyssa K. Schabloski, Esq. $0.00 / Hour. $,.0 Cameron Fredman, Esq. $0.00 / Hour 0.00 $, Sum 0.0 $, A true and correct copy of my firm s detailed billing records itemizing the date, hours and description of the nature of the work performed to date by each of the attorneys in my office, is attached hereto as Exhibit. The Invoice identifies each attorney by their initials.
12 Case :-cv-0-mwf-man :-cv-0-jak-pla Document - - Filed // 0// Page of of Page ID ID #: #: 0 0. The amount described in the preceding paragraph does not include an estimate of hours anticipated on any post-trial motions and/or appeal. My office will appropriately move for post-judgment Attorney Fees, pursuant to the procedures identified in FRCP (a)(). Further, all additional fees incurred in preparing any Reply to the instant motion for fees will be identified in the Reply briefing.. My firm has incurred costs of no less than $0,. in this matter.. The prevailing market rate for lawsuits of this matter in this geographic region is a contingency fee of approximately 0 percent.. To date, my firm has received no compensation in this case and has advanced all costs. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July, 0, at Los Angeles, California. /s/ Matthew S. McNicholas Matthew S. McNicholas
Case3:12-cv-00559-RS Document103-7 Filed05/15/14 Page1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 Leonard B. Simon (State Bar No. 58310) firstname.lastname@example.org LAW OFFICES OF LEONARD B. SIMON 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego,
Case 1:04-cv-01639-RJL Document 1092-20 Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 EXHIBIT 1 s Case 1:04-cv-01639-RJL Document 1092-20 Filed 08/16/13 Page 2 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re
Biographies Attorneys Clement J. Kong (Leads Litigation, General Business, Internal Investigations and EEOC and DFEH Compliance Areas, and Sacramento Office) University of California, Berkeley 1972 (B.A.,
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CHRISTOPHER BALA : ARB Case No. 12-048 Complainant : : v. : : PORT AUTHORITY : TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION : Respondent : DECEMBER 9, 2013 ATTORNEY FEE
Case:-cv-0-CRB Document- Filed0// Page of Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law SBN 0 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, CA 00 Phone: ( 0-0 Fax: ( 0 email@example.com Attorney for David Trinh UNITED STATES
Case :0-cv-00-JWS Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Tara L. Borelli (Pro Hac Vice) LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC. 0 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 00 Atlanta, Georgia 00-0 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Case :-cv-00-fmo-kes Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 STANLEY LAW GROUP MATTHEW J. ZEVIN, SBN: 0 00 Willow Creek Road, Suite 00 San Diego, CA Telephone: () -0 Facsimile: () - e-mail: email@example.com
Case3:07-md-01827-SI Document6657 Filed09/07/12 Page1 of 6 Kevin Wells (Ark. Bar No. 2007-213)* OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 323 Center St., Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Telephone: 501-682-8063
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. ) firstname.lastname@example.org SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. ) email@example.com TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 0) firstname.lastname@example.org GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP Douglass Street San
What Happens Next? The Legal Process Roadmap for Personal Injury Cases By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite 1550 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel:
My Attorney What A Personal Injury Lawyer Can Do For You By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law Davis Law Group, P.S. 2101 Fourth Avenue Suite 630 Seattle, WA 98121 206-727-4000 Davis Law Group, P.S.
Injury Case Roadmap The Legal Process For Personal Injury Cases By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law Davis Law Group, P.S. 2101 Fourth Avenue Suite 630 Seattle, WA 98121 206-727-4000 Davis Law Group,
James J. Banks email@example.com Mr. Banks has practiced law for 30 years, representing private and public sector clients in a variety of litigation matters, and as general counsel. As an outgrowth of
HONORABLE JOSEPH P. SPINOLA New York Joseph P. Spinola is a former Justice of the New York State Supreme Court, Nassau County. He gained a reputation as an eminently qualified and even-handed jurist, who
30 N LaSalle Street Suite 1524 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 262 6700 Facsimile: (312) 262 6710 Attorneys at Law THE FIRM With over 40 years of combined litigation experience, Adria Mossing and Jim
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
The trademark lawyer as brand manager This text first appeared in the IAM magazine supplement Brands in the Boardroom 2005 May 2005 For further information please visit www.iam-magazine.com Feature The
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL BERKELEY * DAVIS * IRVINE * LOS ANGELES * MERCED * RIVERSIDE * SAN DIEGO * SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA * SANTA CRUZ 1111 Franklin
Case :-ml-0-gw-ffm Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #: EXHIBIT Case :-ml-0-gw-ffm Document - Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 Thomas D. Mauriello (Cal. Bar No. ) MAURIELLO LAW FIRM, APC Puerta Del Sol,
RESUMÉ BOYD S. LEMON Attorney and member of the California Bar since 1966; member, Bar of the United States Supreme Court, various United States Courts of Appeals, United States District Courts and United
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : Bogoroch & Associates LLP Sun Life Financial Tower 150 King Street West, Suite 1707 Toronto,
Phone: 310.557.2009 Fax: 310.551.0283 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Parry Cameron has over twenty-three years experience in commercial and business litigation at both the trial and appellate levels. He
Mandatory Arbitration The Alternative To Trial By Christopher M. Davis, Attorney at Law 206-727-4000 Phone: 206-727-4000 Fax: 206-727-4001 email@example.com Copyright 2007 by Christopher Michael
EXHIBIT C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you are not a California resident and you purchased Kashi All Natural / 100% Natural /Nothing Artificial Products between May 3, 2008
United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING This Notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit as described below. You are eligible to receive a portion
Kenneth B. Walton Partner, Chair, Employment Practices Group Member, Executive Committee firstname.lastname@example.org 617-406-4524 direct 617-406-4501 fax Experience Kenneth B. Walton is a Founding Partner
JUNIPER EXH 1026-1 JUNIPER EXH 1026-2 JUNIPER EXH 1026-3 JUNIPER EXH 1026-4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., Petitioner v. BRIXHAM
Case: 10-15113 07/08/2010 Page: 1 of 5 ID: 7398322 DktEntry: 17-1 Appeal No. 10-15113 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APPLE INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PSYSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.
Case :0-cv-0-DDP-VBK Document - #: Filed /0/0 Page of Page ID 0 MOWER, CARREON & DESAI, LLP Aashish Y. Desai (State Bar No. 00 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 0 Irvine, CA Telephone ( -00 Facsimile ( -00 email:
CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: Specialty Products Holdings Corp., et al. Bankruptcy No. 10-11780 Debtor(s) 1 Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) Related to Doc.
Heygood, Orr & Pearson has a proven record of results hundreds of cases of all types and sizes successfully prosecuted or defended for our clients. This long list of results demonstrates our experience
CURRICULUM VITAE OF DARRYL LAMONT LEWIS PERSONAL Born February 23, 1965 in Lexington, Kentucky Married to Salonia L. Lewis Children: Yasmeen Atiya Lewis, born 4/12/93 Taariq Muhammad Lewis, born 1/3/96
CITRON & CITRON 3420 Ocean Park Boulevard Suite 3030 Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 450-6695 (Telephone) (310) 450-3851 (Facsimile) WWW.CITRONLAW.COM *A Martindale Hubbell AV Pre-Eminent Rated Firm* History
THURMAN W. ARNOLD, III, SBN: 1 Certified Family Law Specialist South Civic Drive, Suite 1- PALM SPRINGS, CA TEL: (00-1 FAX: (00-0 Attorney for Respondent, JANE DOE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case 4:04-cv-03526 Document 84 Filed in TXSD on 02/02/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ALEXANDER WARDLAW, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-04-3526
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Capital One, Hibernia, or North Fork, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A
Nancy L. Abell Partner, Employment Law Department email@example.com Nancy Abell is a partner in the Employment Law Department of Paul Hastings. She previously served as the global chair of the
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Ilya Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC554214; Christopher S. DuRee, et al. v.
Shareholder 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 main: (619) 232-0441 direct: (619) 515-1807 fax: (619) 232-4302 firstname.lastname@example.org Focus Areas Discrimination and Harassment Litigation and Trials
Judicial Election Questionnaire - Judge version 1) Your full name: Youlee Yim You 2) Office Address and Phone Number: 1021 SW Fourth Ave., Portland, Oregon 97204 503-988-3404 3) Web site (if applicable):
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.
About Us McLeod Law Group is a boutique civil litigation law firm that is dedicated to providing clients the highest caliber service and representation, while maintaining professionalism, respect and integrity
CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : POTESTIO LAW FIRM 401 Bay Street, Suite 1400 Toronto ON M5H 2Y4 Tel: 905 850 2642 Fax: 905 850 8544 Toll Free:
Sanford Jossen, Esq. T: 877.973.7658 EDUCATION: Southampton College, Long Island University (B.A., English, 1974) University of Hawaii, (1977-1978) University of San Diego, School of Law (J.D., 1980) University
Case 6:10-cv-06134-HO Document 29 Filed 12/21/10 Page 1 of 5 Page ID#: 504 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISON Robert T. DeVaney, et al. v. Plaintiffs, Davis Wright Tremaine
LITIGATING SEXUAL HARASSMENT & SEX DISCRIMINATION CASES By Elizabeth Hubbard and Aaron B. Maduff Managing Editor: Lisa J. Dunne, Esq. Production Editor: Amanda Winkler Editor: Rebecca Aranda Contact us
CURRICULUM VITAE ROBERT J. NAPLETON Firm: MOTHERWAY & NAPLETON, LLP 140 South Dearborn Street Suite 1500 60603 (312) 726-2699 Fax: (312) 726-6851 E-Mail: email@example.com Firm Website: www.mnlawoffice.com
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: SOME DEBTOR, Case No. 11-99999 (Chapter ) Debtor. JUDGE [NAME OF JUDGE] APPLICATION TO EMPLOY [NAME OF LAW FIRM] AS SPECIAL
If you have been sued as a defendant in a civil case...keep reading. Court procedures can be complex. This brochure was developed to help Ohioans who are considering representing themselves in court. It
Kimberlie K. Ryan, Esq. Ryan Law Firm, LLC 283 Columbine St. #157 Denver, CO 80206 (303) 355-0639 firstname.lastname@example.org www.kimberlieryan.com Kimberlie Ryan is in her 18 th year as an attorney and founded the
1055 WEST 7th STREET, 33rd FLOOR PENTHOUSE LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2795 Tel: (213) 627-3113 Fax: (213) 623-9237 FIRM RESUME Child & Marton LLP is a Los Angeles based, AV-rated firm of trial attorneys serving
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN STEVEN OLSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-C-1126 BEMIS COMPANY, INC. et al., Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
Client(s) we represent: # Driver Passenger Left Middle Right Van(L) Van(M) Van(R) Bonar Law Group 1 Centerpointe Dr. Suite #100 La Palma, CA 90623 Telephone: (714) 452-1428 Fax: (714) 452-1418 www.bonarlawgroup.com
Oregon State Bar Special Meeting of the Board of Governors December 23, 2014 9:00 a.m. Conference Call Open Agenda 1. Call to Order 2. Appointment of New Region 4 BOG Member Action Exhibit BOG Open Agenda
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)
CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is and B E T W E E N : Bogoroch & Associates Sun Life Centre 150 King Street West, Suite 1707 P.O. Box 56 Toronto, Ontario M5H
Areas of Concentration Phil is a partner and former co-chair of the Labor and Employment practice group. He represents employers in defending against employment-related claims in both federal and state
TEACHING EXPERIENCE HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLINIC, Hempstead, N.Y. June 2000 through Present Clinical Instructor. Directly supervise law students in all phases of representation
AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENT I, the undersigned client, do hereby retain and employ the Law Offices Of Zarakhovich&Associates, Inc., and, specifically, attorney Mariya Zarakhovich,
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
Mary H. Spillane Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98101 Office: (206) 628-6656 Fax: (206) 628-6611 Email: email@example.com Mary Spillane, a member in the Seattle
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS February 15, 2001 Court of Appeals No. 98CA1099 El Paso County District Court No. 96CV2233 Honorable Theresa M. Cisneros, Judge Carol Koscove, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Bolte,
Your Accident Attorney What a Personal Injury Attorney Can Do For You By Ross A. Jurewitz Injury Accident Attorney, Jurewitz Law Group Jurewitz Law Group 600 B Street Suite San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619-233-5020
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
NINA MARINO 9454 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 500 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Tel: (310) 557-0007 firstname.lastname@example.org EMPLOYMENT Partner, Kaplan Marino, PC Beverly Hills, California 1998-present Solo
What to Expect In Your Lawsuit A lawsuit is a marathon not a sprint. Stewart R. Albertson. There is a saying that the wheels of justice move slowly. That is as true today as when it was initially stated.
Case 2:13-cv-02137-JAR Document 168 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MELISSA STONEBARGER, KIATONA TURNER, AND THERMAN TURNER, JR., Plaintiffs, Case
An Oral Deposition in Texas Litigation Prepared by: Jim L. García Attorney at Law Cersonsky, Rosen & García, P.C. 1770 St. James Place, Suite 150 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: (713) 600-8500/Fax: (713)
Appendix II One Third Contingent Fee Agreement with Waiver of Sliding Scale, 2008 NAME OF CLIENT: DATE OF INJURY: JACOBS, GRUDBERG, BELT, DOW & KATZ P.C. ATTORNEY CONTINGENT FEE AGREEMENT WITH WAIVER OF
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9196 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mark Davidson,
Garrett Kacsuta, et al., v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. Case No. 13-cv-00316-CJC (RNBx) OWNERS OF CERTAIN MODELS OF LENOVO BRAND ULTRABOOK COMPUTERS MAY CLAIM SETTLEMENT BENEFITS. This Class Action Settlement
Firm Overview Founded in 1976, Grimm, Vranjes & Greer LLP is an AV rated law firm located in San Diego, California. Since our founding we have built and maintained strong ties throughout Southern California.
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION NJ TRANSIT BUS OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. NJ TRANSIT MERCER, INC. NJ TRANSIT MORRIS, INC. REGULARLY SCHEDULED BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER
General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance
Case 2:14-cv-01178-MJP Document 35 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 6 The Honorable Marsha J. Pechman UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE A.B.; et al. Plaintiffs, vs. Washington
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to Bank of America, You may be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court authorized