1 Scientific decision support for decision makers in practice through collaborative knowledge management - A systemic approach and a case study integrated flood management - Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree Doctor rer. nat. of the Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany by Tuck Fatt Siew Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany 2009
2 Name of Dean: Prof. Dr. Heinz Rennenberg Name of Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Gerhard Oesten Name of 2 nd Reviewer: Prof. em. Christian Leibundgut Date of thesis defence:
3 i Preface I was, at the beginning of my PhD study, involved in the EU INTERREG IIIB project WaReLa (Water Retention by Land-Use). The transnational project aimed at developing a transnational decision support instrument for spatial planning to decrease flood disasters, which are caused by small and medium-sized rivers, by precautionary land-use in meso-scale catchment areas. As one of the 11 project partners, the Institute of Forestry Economics contributed to the development of an Eco-Efficiency Analysis (EEA) concept. This concept was complementary to the physical process-based decision support systems. The final output was called EEA-DSS (Eco-Efficient Decision Support Systems). This decision support tool should serve the purpose of assisting spatial planners or decision makers in evaluating the impacts and feasibility of potential water retention measures to be implemented in forestry, agriculture and urban sectors. The project has ended but the tool has not been implemented successfully in practice. Reflecting on this experience, a series of questions came across my mind. I asked: Why did it fail?, What was the reason?, How does decision support operate in reality? Bearing these questions in mind, I started to look for the answers through intensive literature research and analysis. I found out that WaReLa is just one of the many examples of normative decision support projects, which produce decision support instruments to objectively support decision-making processes. The normative way of decision support exerts explicitly or implicitly how decision support instruments should operate in practice according to the norms, values, and assumptions of the researchers. From my point of view, decision support researchers lack of understanding about how the prevailing decision support practices in reality are, if not being ignorant. This understanding is related to the social and institutional components as well as the actual needs of the users in practice. The lack of the understanding about these aspects results in a gap between decision support developers and users at the implementation stage. We can argue that doing research is a learning process, which allows for the exploration of scientific innovations and, at the same time, the achievement of academic excellence. We can even say that we must safeguard the solidarity of science. But, if we, as research scientists, are determined to contribute to the management of societal problems, we should genuinely doing so and move beyond the normative way of thinking. Without doing this, decision support efforts remain as academic exercises and research scientists are perpetually trapped in a vicious cycle. This is a cycle, in which researchers compete for big fundings by proposing decision support projects with a list of promised benefits. The projects are launched and are carried out by multidisciplinary research groups. When the projects end after a few years, the promised benefits fail to be achieved, the outputs are not accepted, and new projects are proposed and launched again.
4 ii In this study, I intend to critically analyse how decision support have been and how decision support are. Additionally, I attempt to demonstrate the possibility of promoting the practice of scientific decision support for decision makers in practice through collaborative knowledge management. Freiburg, in February 2009 Tuck Fatt Siew
5 iii Acknowledgements First of all, I am deeply grateful to German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for offering me a great opportunity to pursue a doctorate degree in Germany. The study would not have been possible without its financial support. Besides, I have also been able to explore my life to a great extent in a new environment and be able to fulfil what I have been yearning for under this scholarship programme. I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Gerhard Oesten for accepting me as a student at the Institute of Forestry Economics and for giving me constructive suggestions and comments on my work. My gratitude also goes to Dr. Frank Ebinger, who was my supervising tutor, for sharing his critical thoughts, comments, and understandings. To all my colleagues and other individuals, with whom I become acquainted, I am very thankful for their advice, help, and amicability. Working in a culturally and linguistically diverse environment is certainly challenging, but not less interesting. The experience gained is unforgettable and helps to develop my personality. My special thank is also extended to the staff at the LUWG, especially Mr. Christoph Linnenweber and his former colleague, Mr. Heiko Franke, as well as individuals coming from other institutions, all who rendered assistance during the course of my research. Last but not least, I would like to express invaluable gratefulness to my family and friends for being very supportive and having trust on me. My personal note of appreciation goes specifically to Wolfgang and his family for motivating me, giving me strength, and sharing with me the culture and life in Germany. Life is wonderful!
6 iv Abstract Appropriate scientific outputs, including decision support tools, methods, and knowledge must be effectively produced and transferred through science-management interfaces in order to be applied successfully in the management of societal problems. Often, the implementation of scientific outputs in practice is very limited. The problem has been attributable to the existence of an interface gap between science and management domains. The challenge for scientists is, apart from purposeful innovations, to address the cognitive and socio-cultural differences between and within these domains. This study attempts to address two research questions: What are the reasons for the non-integration of scientific outputs in practice? How should the underlying integration problem in the complex and uncertain decision-making environment be addressed holding on the premise that scientific data, information, knowledge, and wisdom are the fundamental resources in societal decision-making? The main objective of this study is to develop a strategy for promoting scientific decision support for decision makers in practice through collaborative knowledge management. The study adopts a reflexive methodology encompassing the approaches of theoretical analysis of the main issue and model building for addressing the problem concerned, both of which are associated with deductive logic and case study. It is a science of science research. This thesis is arranged in six chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction, including problem statement; Chapter 2: Theoretical background; Chapter 3: Conceptual framework; Chapter 4: Case study; Chapter 5: Conceptual framework reformulation; and Chapter 6: Research outlook. A systemic or systems approach using systems thinking is adopted in this study to address the interrelated issues of the complex problem situation. Applying the holistic thinking, cross-disciplinary literatures of related issues are critically analysed. The scope of the analysis encompasses scientific decision support approaches and innovations, the use for scientific data, information, knowledge, and wisdom as decision support resources, and the challenges to the integration of scientific outputs into practice. With regard to the challenges to integration, the influences of the paradigms of scientists and the rationality of decision makers on knowledge generation and utilisation are analysed. Considering the cognitive and socio-cultural differences between two different knowledge entities, a conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management is presented as a means to promote scientific decision support for decision makers in practice. The concepts and theories of Unbounded Systems Thinking, Knowledge Management Cycle, sense-making, and interfacing agents are applied in the development
7 v of this framework. The conceptual framework is compared with the actual practice of decision support referring to a case study of integrated flood management in Rhineland- Palatinate, Germany. The discrepancies between the theoretically developed conceptual framework and the one derived from the case study are identified. The findings highlight the lack of existing mechanisms both for the articulation of tacit knowledge and for direct feedback between decision support developers and users of Informationspaket. Additionally, the differences between the developers and users as well as between a consultant and a research scientist are also identified using the same case study. The findings of the case study indicate that the management domain does not reject or deny scientific innovation or knowledge. But this domain (constituting different levels of authorities with diverse institutional roles and responsibilities) is rather reluctant to adopt scientific outputs produced by researchers, which could probably be attributable to three main reasons. Firstly, the practitioners cannot associate themselves well with third party products, especially when the products do not meet the pragmatic standard. Being pragmatic emphasises the development of non-complicated models or assessment methods based on the availability of data. Secondly, the practitioners are often not convinced by the results generated by computer models due to incompatible scales. Thirdly, the practitioners, especially those at the implementing level, need intensive personal and professional expertise support. In this respect, getting the contributions of scientists to be recognised and accepted in practice is challenging. There are a number of possible preconditions for promoting successful collaboration between science and management domains, thereby promoting the integration of scientific outputs in decision-making processes. Scientists need to: (1) get strategic partners or champions involved in a project; (2) demonstrate their capabilities, professional competency, and long-term commitment to a project; (3) conform to practical norms; and (4) demonstrate the ability to provide expertise knowledge or scientific wisdom in practice. Whilst fulfilling these preconditions is resource-demanding, changing the quality of the relationship between science and management is a long-term process. A reformulated conceptual framework, together with the best practice of decision support is presented in Chapter 5. The conceptual framework is adaptive and flexible in nature. Its structure can be adjusted based on problem contexts as well as institutional scales and levels. In general, scientists and decision makers must address the institutional barriers and incentives to collaborative knowledge management. Furthermore, it is necessary to continually raise awareness of the importance of having frequent discursive and reflexive dialogues between as well as within scientists and decision makers in promoting mutual learning and reinforcing partnerships. The presentation of the reformulated conceptual framework is followed by the limitations of the study and further research.
8 vi Zusammenfassung Wissenschaftliche Resultate mit entsprechenden Entscheidungsunterstützungsinstrumenten, Methoden und Kenntnissen müssen effektiv produziert und durch Schnittstellen zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis übertragen werden, um das Management der sozialen Probleme zweckmäßig zu unterstützen. Häufig ist die Anwendung der wissenschaftlichen Resultate in der Praxis sehr begrenzt. Das Problem ist dem Schnittstellenabstand zwischen den beiden Bereichen zuzuordnend. Abgesehen von zweckmäßigen Innovationen stellen die kognitiven und sozialkulturellen Unterschiede zwischen und innerhalb dieser Bereiche eine große Herausforderung für die Wissenschaftler dar. Diese Studie versucht zwei wissenschaftliche Fragestellungen zu beantworten: Was sind die Gründe für das Problem, dass die wissenschaftlichen Resultate nicht in die Praxis integriert werden können? Wie sollte auf das zugrunde liegende Integrationsproblem, das in einem komplizierten und ungewissen Entscheidungsfindungsumfeld existiert, eingegangen werden, mit Rücksicht auf die wissenschaftlichen Daten, Informationen, Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen als die grundlegenden Entscheidungsfindungsressourcen? Die Zielsetzung dieser Studie ist, eine Strategie durch kooperatives Wissensmanagement zu entwickeln, um die wissenschaftliche Entscheidungsunterstützung für die Entscheidungsträger in der Praxis zu fördern. Die Studie wendet eine Reflexivmethodologie in Bezug auf den Forschungsprozess an. Die Fragestellungen werden durch die Ansätze von einer theoretischen Analyse und einer Modellbildung, die mit deduktiver Logik und Fallstudie assoziiert ist, beantwortet. Die Forschung ist Wissenschaft der Wissenschaft. Diese Dissertation wird in sechs Kapitel eingeteilt: Kapitel 1: Einleitung, einschließlich Problemstellung; Kapitel 2: Theoretische Grundlage; Kapitel 3: Konzeptioneller Rahmen; Kapitel 4: Fallstudie; Kapitel 5: Darstellung des überarbeiteten konzeptionellen Rahmens; und Kapitel 6: Ausblick. Ein systemisches Vorgehen, nämlich Systemisches Denken, wird in dieser Studie angewandt, um die zusammenhängenden Themen der komplizierten Problemsituation zu erklären. Basierend auf diesem Denken werden interdisziplinäre Literaturen kritisch analysiert. Der Umfang der Analyse zeigt die wissenschaftlichen Entscheidungsunterstützungsansätze und Innovationen, die Anwendung der wissenschaftlichen Daten, Informationen, Kenntnisse und Erfahrungen als Entscheidungsunterstützungsressourcen bzw. die Herausforderungen zur Integration der wissenschaftlichen Resultate in die Praxis. Hinsichtlich der Herausforderungen zur Integration werden die Einflüsse der unterschiedlichen Paradigmen der Wissenschaftler
9 vii auf Wissenserzeugung und die Rationalität der Entscheidungsträger auf die Anwendung des Wissens analysiert. In Betrachtung der kognitiven und soziokulturellen Unterschiede zwischen Wissenschaftlern und Praxis wird ein konzeptioneller Rahmen des kooperativen Wissensmanagements dargestellt. Die Funktion des Rahmens ist es, die wissenschaftliche Entscheidungsunterstützung für die Entscheidungsträger in der Praxis zu fördern. Konzepte und die Theorien wie das Unbegrenzte Systemische Denken, der Wissensmanagementzyklus, das Sensemaking und die Kopplungsagenten werden in der Entwicklung dieses Rahmens angewendet. Der konzeptionelle Rahmen wird mit der Darstellung der Entscheidungsunterstützung in der Praxis - die Ergebnisse einer Fallstudie des integrierten Flutmanagements in Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland - verglichen. Die Diskrepanzen zeigen auf, dass die Mechanismen für eine Umwandlung des Impliziten Wissens und für eine direkte Rückmeldung zwischen Entscheidungsunterstützungsentwicklern und Benutzern des Informationspaketes nicht vorhanden sind. Zusätzlich werden die Unterschiede zwischen den Entwicklern und Benutzern in der Praxis sowie zwischen einem Fachberater und einem Wissenschaftler dargestellt. Die Ergebnisse der Fallstudie zeigen auf, dass der Managementbereich die wissenschaftlichen Innovationen und Erkenntnisse nicht zurückweist. Aber dieser Bereich, der aus verschiedenen Organisationsebenen besteht, hat oft Schwierigkeiten, die wissenschaftlichen Resultate anzunehmen. Das liegt vermutlich an drei Gründen. Erstens können die Entscheidungsträger Fremdprodukte nicht gut annehmen, insbesondere wenn diese nicht die entsprechenden, d.h. von einem pragmatischen Standard abweichenden Produkte sind. Die Entscheidungsträger heben hervor, dass die Wissenschaftler bei der Entwicklung eines Modells oder einer analytischen Methode auf die Verfügbarkeit der Grundlagendaten Rücksicht nehmen sollten. Der Aufbau der Modelle sollte auch nicht kompliziert sein. Zweitens sind die Entscheidungsträger häufig nicht von den Resultaten eines Modells wegen inkompatibler Maßstäbe überzeugt. Drittens benötigen die Entscheidungsträger, insbesondere die auf der Umsetzungsebene sind, intensive persönliche und fachliche Unterstützung. In dieser Hinsicht ist es eine Herausforderung, die Akzeptanz von wissenschaftlichen Resultaten in der Praxis zu fördern. Es gibt einige Voraussetzungen für die Förderung einer erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis, wodurch die wissenschaftlichen Resultate in die Praxis besser integriert werden können. Wissenschaftler sollten: (1) strategische Partner oder Champions in ein Projekt mit einbeziehen; (2) ihre Fähigkeiten, Fachkompetenz und langfristige Verpflichtung zu einem Projekt beweisen; (3) die praktischen Normen berücksichtigen; und (4) die Fähigkeiten, Fachkenntnisse und wissenschaftliche Erfahrungen in der Praxis zur Verfügung stellen. Das Erfüllen dieser Voraussetzungen ist anspruchsvoll und enthält große Ressourcen. Dabei stellt die Förderung eines guten Verhältnisses zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis einen langfristigen Prozess dar.
10 viii Ein neuformulierter konzeptioneller Rahmen, zusammen mit dem bewährten Verfahren der Entscheidungsunterstützung, wird in Kapitel 5 dargestellt. Der konzeptionelle Rahmen ist anpassungsfähig und flexibel. Die Struktur kann an Problemzusammenhänge sowie Institutionsskalen und Ebenen adaptiert werden. Im Allgemeinen müssen die Institutionsbarrieren und die Anreize für ein kooperatives Wissensmanagement zwischen Wissenschaftlern und Entscheidungsträgern in der Praxis beachtet werden. Außerdem ist es notwendig, das Bewusstsein von der Bedeutung der häufigen Diskursiv- bzw. Reflexivdialoge zwischen den sowie innerhalb der Bereiche der Wissenschaftler und Entscheidungsträger kontinuierlich zu fördern, um das gegenseitige Lernen und die Kopplung der beiden Bereiche zu verstärken. Im Anschluss an die Darstellung des neuformulierten konzeptionellen Rahmens werden die Grenzen der Studie und der Forschungsbedarf aufgezeigt.
11 ix Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgements Abstract Zusammenfassung Table of Contents List of Figures List of abbreviations i iii iv vi ix xi xii 1 INTRODUCTION Problem statement Objectives and research questions Structure of argumentation Methodology 5 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND: Decision support in the face of complex societal problems Systems thinking The complexity of societal problems Decision support Post-war development of decision support: from machine age to systems age Decision support vis-à-vis decision-making Decision support tools Decision support process Considerations in decision support tools innovations Scientific data, information, knowledge, and wisdom as decision support resources Data, information, knowledge, wisdom The need for scientific data, information, knowledge, and wisdom in societal decision-making Integrating scientific knowledge into practice The challenges to the integration of scientific outputs into practice Science-management interface The Paradigm Lock in the interface Epistemic community in the science domain Science Epistemic community Bounded rationality in the management domain Summary 37 3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: Scientific decision support for decision makers in practice through collaborative knowledge management Fundamental concepts The Unbounded Systems Thinking Knowledge Management Cycle Sense-making Interfacing agents 47
12 x 3.2 The conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management The organisation The components and their roles The process of knowledge generation, mediation, utilisation, and conversion The interaction between the components and processes 53 4 CASE STUDY: Decision support for integrated flood management in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany Integrated flood management in Rhineland-Palatinate: Aktion Blau Informationspaket Methods 59 Limitations of the case study The participants of Informationspaket State water manager, LUWG Regional water manager, Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektion (SGD) Land manager, DLR Westpfalz The consultants Presentation of results from interviews Interview with the state water manager, LUWG Interviews with the land managers, DLR Westpfalz Interviews with the consultants Findings Depiction of decision support in practice The organisation The components and their roles The process of information flow Discrepancies between conceptualised framework of scientific decision support and decision support in practice The terms information and knowledge The articulation of tacit knowledge The interface Feedback mechanism The differences between decision support developers and users in practice The differences between consultants and research scientists 80 5 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK REFORMULATION Experience derived from the case study The reformulated conceptual framework 86 6 RESEARCH OUTLOOK Limitations of the study Further research 90 Bibliography 91 Appendix 1: Structure of administration Rhineland-Palatinate 98 Appendix 2: Guides on designing and conducting semi-structured interview 99 Appendix 3: Interview guides (in German) 101 3a: State water manager, LUWG 101 3b: Land manager, DLR Westpfalz 103 3c: Consultants 105
13 xi List of Figures Figure 1: Structure of argumentation of the thesis Figure 2: The three dimensions of complex unstructured problems (Kolkman et al., 2005) Figure 3: The interaction between science and management domains in an informal organisation through an interface Figure 4: The paradigm lock illustrated by UNESCO (in Acreman, 2005) Figure 5: The views of managers and scientists about each other (Roux et al., 2006) Figure 6: Theoretical problems at the science-policy intersection and normative requirements for the interfaces (van den Hove, 2007) Figure 7: Characteristics of mode 1 and mode 2 science (Gibbons et al., 1994) Figure 8: Communities of knowledge generation (summarised and adapted from Kolkman et al., 2005) Figure 9: Mitroff/Linstone UST model (Hall et al., 2005) Figure 10: Knowledge management cycle model (King et al., 2008) Figure 11: The Knowing Organization (Choo, 1996) Figure 12: The general layout of the human and technical components of the informal organisation under the perspective of personal, technical and organisational Figure 13: The science loop the process of knowledge generation and the mediation of knowledge utilisation initiated by the science domain Figure 14: The management loop is added to the science loop representing the process of knowledge utilisation in the management domain Figure 15: The complete layout of the conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management by adding the feedback or interaction loop to illustrate the interconnections between personnels Figure 16: Aktion Blau for integrated flood management in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (in German; adapted from LUWG, 2005: p.11) Figure 17: Information and knowledge flow through Informationspaket for integrated flood management in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany Figure 18: The differences between decision support developers and users in practice Figure 19: The differences between a consultant and a research scientist Figure 20: Reformulated conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management
14 xii List of abbreviations CoP DIKW DLR DSS EU GIS HELP ICT IFM IWRM LAWA LUWG MUFV MWVLW NoP OLAP OR PSS R&D SDSS SGD UNESCO UST WFD WMO Communities of Practice Data, information, knowledge, wisdom Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum Decision Support Systems European Union Geographic Information Systems Hydrology for the Environment, Life and Policy Information, communication and technology Integrated Flood Management Integrated Water Resources Management Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Ministerium für Umwelt, Forsten und Verbraucherschutz Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau Networks of Practice On-Line Analytical Processing Operation Research Planning Support Systems Research and Development Spatial Decision Support Systems Struktur- und Genehmigungsdirektionen United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Unbounded Systems Thinking Water Framework Directive World Meteorological Organization
15 INTRODUCTION 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Problem statement Planners and decision makers involving in the management of environmental problems are confronted with planning and decision-making tasks, which entail far-reaching and interconnected consequences on the society, environment, and economics. These tasks are concerned with the design, selection, and implementation of potential alternatives of problem solutions requiring trade-off analysis of often conflicting goals. In the context of integrated flood management, which sits within the broader context of integrated water resource management (UNESCO, 2007), planners or decision makers need to devise plans or make decisions about possible flood mitigating measures. The potential measures aim to reduce human and socio-economic losses from flooding and use of flood plains while increasing social, economic, and ecological benefits. Executing the demanding management tasks requires a resourceful and resource-rich decision-making capacity. This capacity is supported by large bodies of cross-cutting information and knowledge as well as coherent relationships between science, politics, public administrations, and other stakeholders. Considering the needs to manage complex environmental or societal problems 1, research scientists have been striving to develop modelling, simulation or decision support systems to provide better scientific information and knowledge as well as to facilitate decision makers in comprehending problems, analysing decisions, and predicting decision outcomes. Relating to group decision-making, computer-based tools are also designed for facilitating group discussion, and thereby increasing satisfaction and compromise so as to obtain an inclusive, equitable and defendable decision (Walker et al., 2001). Building on the expectations of what decision support tools could achieve, significant amount of money has been invested in decision support projects. At the European level, the European Union Fifth Framework Programme has invested about 250 million Euro in 180 river basin modelling projects to address issues stipulated in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) 2 (Borowski and Pahl-Wostl, 2008). Despite the advanced innovation in computer-based tools, the implementation of the developed tools has, hitherto, limited success 3 in practice. They fail to fulfil expectations across many of the domains in which it has been applied (Walker, 2002). The failure of the end products of the vast number of decision support projects, which are sometimes overlapping (Szaro et al., 1998), are attributable to irrelevance, inflexibility, inaccessibility 1 Environmental problems are defined as being basically social problems (Timmerman and Langaas, 2005). 2 One of the main types of tools available to support the WFD implementation consists of mathematical simulation models for river catchment (Willems and de Lange, 2007). 3 Finlay and Forghani (1998) suggested success is equated with repeat use and user-satisfaction.
16 2 INTRODUCTION of the tools as well as the lack of confidence of the users and institutional barriers. The status quo of decision support tools may reflect what Biswas (1975) reckoned about 30 years ago: the purpose of the models developed could be classified somewhere between dilettantism and academic exercises. The investigation of the failure in decision support projects is rarely conducted. It has been argued that the non-application of decision support tools in practice cannot be described as unsuccessful. Success is difficult to be defined (Todd, 2001 and Moore, 1996; in Janssen et al., 2006). Walker (2002) argued that it is a significant challenge in its own right as failure is rarely reported and analysed. According to Walker (2002), many DSS initiatives that have not resulted in significant operational use have nevertheless been judged to have been successful on the basis of the learning achieved by the developers and users, particularly where development has been highly participatory. This, however, does not justify the doubts of decision makers who require practical tools, credible information and knowledge to deal with the urgency of public decisionmaking. The antagonistic views about the achievement of decision support projects have recently been reflected through the research on science-policy or science-management interface gap. This emerging research is particularly concerned with the comprehension of cognitive and socio-cultural differences between science and practice. It has been debated that these differences have caused the non-delivery and non-adoption of scientific outputs in practice. In light of the importance of addressing this soft aspect, the implementation of decision support tools must embrace procedures that can deal with the complexity of organisational decisions of future and go beyond the technical orientation of previous decision support systems (Courtney, 2001). Courtney (2001) argued that a major overhaul of the conventional DSS scarcely considers anything but the technical perspective. The limitations inherent in the underlying methodologies in the technical or hard approach become one of the barriers to DSS research (Ho and Sculli, 1997). Addressing the interface problem within an organisation, Courtney (2001) voiced out the need for a new decision-making paradigm for DSS by integrating knowledge management. The multiple perspective approach of knowledge management as a strategy for decision support in an informal organisation, in which science and management domains co-exist, has not been explored. The strategy of collaborating decision support and knowledge management should serve three purposes. Firstly, it should bridge the interface gap between science and management domains. Secondly, it should encourage the effective use of scientific outputs in light of the challenges to harmonise the concurrent implementation of different European Directives at the national and local levels, for example the EU Flood
17 INTRODUCTION 3 Directive 4 and the EU Water Framework Directive 5, which are concerned with integrated flood management and water management, respectively. Thirdly, it should encourage the efficient use of human and funding resources. In this respect, this study attempts to answer the following main questions: What are the reasons for the non-integration of scientific outputs in practice? How should the underlying integration problem in the complex and uncertain decision-making environment be addressed holding on the premise that scientific data, information, knowledge, and wisdom are the fundamental resources in societal decision-making? 1.2 Objectives and research questions The main objective of this study is to develop a strategy for promoting scientific decision support for decision makers in practice through collaborative knowledge management. This study does not aim to develop decision support systems for supporting decision-making processes. Instead, it focuses on the integration of science and management domains as well as the application of scientific outputs in practice. The specific objectives of this study are: To seek theoretical explanations for the non-integration of scientific outputs into practice; To propose a conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management as the basis for scientific decision support; To compare the proposed conceptual framework with a practical example using the case of integrated flood management; To recommend best practice for promoting the integration of scientific outputs in practice. The corresponding research questions for achieving the objectives are: What could be the underlying reasons that result in the non-integration of scientific outputs into practice? 4 The EU Flood Directive 2007/60/EC on the assessment and management of floods has been adopted since October 2007 at the EU level. The Directive calls on the member states to establish flood risk management plans by 22 December The plan shall be coordinated at the level of the river basin district or unit of management. The Directive emphasises the quantitative aspect of flood risk management. 5 The EU Water Framework Directive 2000/60/E is a water legislation produced by the European Commission as a driver for achieving sustainable management of water in the Member States. All inland and coastal waters within defined river basin districts must reach at least good status by 2015 through the establishment of environmental objectives and ecological targets for surface waters taking into consideration environmental, economic and social aspects.
18 4 INTRODUCTION What constitutes a conceptual framework of collaborative knowledge management and how does it function? What are the discrepancies between the proposed conceptual framework and the practice of decision support through knowledge management in the case of integrated flood management? What is the best practice for promoting the integration of scientific outputs into practice? 1.3 Structure of argumentation This thesis constitutes altogether six chapters which are illustrated in Figure 1. Chapter 1 introduces the problem to be studied, the objectives to be achieved, the organisation of the thesis, and the methodology used in this study. Chapter 2 provides a theoretical background of the study through cross-disciplinary literature. The problem addressed in this study deals with situations which are bound with system complexity and scientific controversies. The complexity of the problem conveys the notion that the problem is not concerned with the discovery of particular facts, but with the comprehension of the management of an inherently complex reality (Kolkman et al., 2005). The limited or unstructured understanding of the system is a source of dispute and controversy (Slob et al., 2007). Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Theoretical background Chapter 3: Conceptual framework Chapter 4: Case study Chapter 5: Conceptual framework reformulation Chapter 6: Research outlook Figure 1: Structure of argumentation of the thesis.
19 INTRODUCTION 5 Based on these notions, Chapter 2 begins with the introduction on the concept of systems thinking and the characteristics of the complexity of societal problems. The understanding of the concept of systems thinking is imperative as the essence of this thesis constitutes various aspects, which have to be linked in a holistic way. Descriptions on the complexity of societal problems, on the other hand, serve the purpose of providing a broad understanding about the problems associated with decision support and the possibility of capitalising on scientific knowledge to promote scientific decision support for decision makers in practice. Other sections in Chapter 2 focus on providing for critical theoretical analysis pertaining to decision support leading to the analysis of the science-management interface problem. The theoretical analysis is followed by the development of a conceptual model incorporating relevant concepts from the management field (Chapter 3). The second part of the dissertation presents a case study of integrated flood management in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (Chapter 4). This study does not adopt the conventional approach of deriving lessons learned from the involvement in a decision support project initiated by an academic research team. Instead, it synthesises the practical experience gained by the practitioners themselves, who are involved in the development of a decision support instrument for use in practice. Semi-structure interviews were conducted with the practitioners, in addition to document analysis and participation in a workshop. By synthesising the results from the case study, the practice of decision support and knowledge management is formulated and compared with the theoretical conceptual framework. Simultaneously, the case study is also used to find out the differences or similarities between decision support developers and users in practice as well as between consultants and academic researchers. Subsequently, a reformulated conceptual framework is derived and the best practice for decision support is suggested (Chapter 5). The thesis ends with the discussion on the limitations of the study and the recommendations for further research (Chapter 6). 1.4 Methodology Most of the studies addressing the problem of integrating scientific outputs into practice have been conducted in the broader context of integrated water resources management or in other field of natural resources management. Little is known about the science and management interface problem in the context of integrated flood management. Although the contexts of the management issues are different, the nature of the sciencemanagement interface problem encountered in the different types of management is similar. The nature of the problem is also comparable to that in the field of management sciences. This study as a whole is exploratory and reflexive in nature. Reflexive methodology is concerned with the importance and role of interpretation and reflection during the research process (Alvesson and Sköldberg, 2000). This approach aims to produce more
20 6 INTRODUCTION interesting and unexpected research results by re-thinking conventions and open up for more varied and challenging uses of research questions, fieldwork practices, modes of interpretations, and styles of writing. For addressing the research questions, this study adopts the approaches of theoretical analysis of the main issue and model building for addressing the problem concerned, both of which are associated with deductive logic and case study. In general, this is a science of science research to address the need for better tools, methods, and knowledge for encouraging the efficacy and impact of science and technology on societal decision-making.
econstor www.econstor.eu Der Open-Access-Publikationsserver der ZBW Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft The Open Access Publication Server of the ZBW Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Siew, Tuck
STAGE 1 STANDARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ROLE DESCRIPTION - THE MATURE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER The following characterises the senior practice role that the mature, Professional Engineer may be expected
Essay Towards a new paradigm of science in scientific policy advising 2007 Eva Kunseler Kansanterveyslaitos Environment and Health Department Methods of Scientific Thought Prof. Lindqvist Introduction:
LONDON SCHOOL OF COMMERCE Programme Specifications for the Cardiff Metropolitan University MSc in International Hospitality Management 1 Contents Programme Aims and Objectives 3 Programme Learning Outcomes
Executive Doctorate in Higher Education Management Curriculum Guide The Executive Doctorate in Higher Education Management Program consists of six consecutive terms, starting with a late summer term and
FLOOD DAMAGES AND TOOLS FOR THEIR MITIGATION Lenka Camrova, Jirina Jilkova University of Economics, Prague, 2006, pp. 418. ISBN: 80-86684-35-0 English Summary In 1997 and 2002 the Czech Republic was heavily
2012/2013 Programme Specification Data Programme Name Programme Number Programme Award QAA Subject Benchmark Statements Financial Management P10423 MSc/PGDip Business Programme Aims Outcomes: Knowledge
BC Public Service Competencies Competencies that support LEADING PEOPLE For Executive and Directors: Motivating for Peak Performance Motivating for peak performance involves knowledge and skills in using
C:\Ton\DELTA00Mouthaan.doc 0 oktober 00 Competencies of BSc and MSc programmes in Electrical engineering and student portfolios Ton J.Mouthaan, R.W. Brink, H.Vos University of Twente, fac. of EE, The Netherlands
Curriculum for Bachelor s Degree Programme in Procuct Development and Technology Integration September 2011 Table of Contents The purpose of the curriculum is: 4 1. The purpose of the educational programme
London School of Commerce Programme Specification for the Cardiff Metropolitan University Bachelor of Arts (Hons) in Business Studies 1 Contents Page 1. Aims and Objectives 3 2. Programme Learning Outcomes
1 Doctor of Education - Higher Education The University of Liverpool s Doctor of Education - Higher Education (EdD) is a professional doctoral programme focused on the latest practice, research, and leadership
Implementation of a Quality Management System for Aeronautical Information Services -1- Implementation of a Quality Management System for Aeronautical Information Services Chapter IV, Quality Management
SUBJECT-SPECIFIC CRITERIA Relating to the accreditation of Bachelor s and Master s degree programmes in industrial engineering (as of 09 December 2011) The following specifications complement the ASIIN
HENLEY BUSINESS SCHOOL DOCTORAL PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 1 1 CONTENTS Page 1. Award Information and Programme Description 3 2. Educational Aims of the Programme 4 Programme
Adaptive Business Intelligence Bearbeitet von Zbigniew Michalewicz, Martin Schmidt, Matthew Michalewicz, Constantin Chiriac 1. Auflage 2006. Buch. xiii, 246 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 540 32928 2 Format (B
Appendix 2: Intended learning outcomes of the Bachelor IBA Intended international & intercultural learning outcomes are presented in bold. Content related aspects Have knowledge of business administrative
DOCTOR IN EDUCATION COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A. CORE COURSES NEDD 800 Professionalism, Ethics, and the Self This introductory core course will explore and interrogate ideas surrounding professionalism and professionalization.
IB position paper Holistic education: An interpretation for teachers in the IB programmes John Hare International International Baccalaureate Baccalaureate Organization Organization 2010 2010 1 Language
1 11.1 Definitions and Motivation Lot of research and papers in this emerging field: Visual Analytics: Scope and Challenges of Keim et al. Illuminating the path of Thomas and Cook 2 11.1 Definitions and
Smart City event Merging experiences: SCP 2.0 and PLEEC objectives, key fields and monitoring Klima- und Energiefonds, Wien 30 th of June, 2015 Rudolf Giffinger Vienna University of Technology Department
2012/2013 Programme Specification Data Programme Name Public Relations Programme Number Programme Award QAA Subject Benchmark Statements n/a Masters The QAA benchmarking statements for Masters of Business
Registries: An alternative for clinical trials? Prof. Dr. Joerg Hasford, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Call topics 2013 SAF RA joint call on Human and organizational factors including the value of industrial safety September 2013 SAF RA is an ERA-NET on industrial safety funded by the European Commission
2012/2013 Programme Specification Data Programme Name Programme Number Programme Award QAA Subject Benchmark Statements Business Purchasing and Supply Chain Management P11663 BA (Hons) Business/Management
REGULATIONS AND CURRICULUM FOR THE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AALBORG UNIVERSITY SEPTEMBER 2015 Indhold PART 1... 4 PRELIMINARY REGULATIONS... 4 Section 1 Legal
1 2 3 4 5 Specialized Knowledge Broad and Integrative Knowledge Intellectual Skills Applied and Collaborative Learning Civic and Global Learning The Degree Qualifications Profile (DQP) provides a baseline
Future Research Leaders call 2015/16 Guidance notes for non-academic reviewers Introduction... 1 Aims and objectives... 1 Procedure... 3 Peer Review form on Je-S... 3 The decision-making process... 3 Assessment
Kapitel 2 Unternehmensarchitektur III Software Architecture, Quality, and Testing FS 2015 Prof. Dr. Jana Köhler email@example.com IT Strategie Entwicklung "Foundation for Execution" "Because experts
The NBS MBA Programme has two connected parts to the programme. The first is the assessed part of this Masters Programme, the Core Modules, Consultancies, Electives, Business Project Dissertation are listed
G. Schernewski und T. Dolch (Hrsg.): Geographie der Meere und Küsten Coastline Reports 1 (2004), ISSN 0928-2734 S. 177-181 Holistic Systems Analysis for ICZM: The Coastal Futures Approach Andreas Kannen
THE CULTURE OF INNOVATION AND THE BUILDING OF KNOWLEDGE SOCIETIES - Issue Paper - UNESCO, Bureau of Strategic Planning September 2003 1 I. The past and present scope of innovation During the last two decades,
Message from the Chief Executive of the RCM The Midwifery Leadership Competency Framework has been derived from both the NHS Leadership Qualities Framework and the Clinical Leadership Competency Framework.
POSITION PAPER ON SCOPES OF PRACTICE PUBLISHED BY THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORKERS AND SOCIAL SERVICE WORKERS OCTOBER 2008 Published by the OCSWSSW October 2008 2 Ontario College of Social Workers
ON THE ROLE AND RELEVANCE OF AGENCIES IN INTEGRATED MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS: A quantitative study assessing which contributions to an integrated corporate image large Austrian enterprises require from
Short Report Research and development project Communicating the concept of ecosystem services on the basis of the TEEB study Researcher: Project time: Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ August
DEGREE PROGRAMME IN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CURRICULUM 2014-2017 (approved by the faculty council 27.3.2014, updated VAAM044, VAAM045 and VAAM051, VARS030, KTK0006, VARS034 faculty council 26.3.2015)
CHE Competencies Starting in the early 1990s, three national professional organizations the Society for Public Health Education, the American Association for Health Education, and the American Alliance
DESCRIPTOR OF THE STUDY FIELD OF ACOUNTING CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The Descriptor of the study field of Accounting (hereinafter referred to as the Descriptor ) shall govern the special requirements
Integrating Jalopy code formatting in CVS repositories A NOW guide Dr. Wolfgang Thronicke C-LAB Short Report Vol. 1 (2004) No. 2 Cooperative Computing & Communication Laboratory ISSN 1614-1172 C-LAB ist
(Cycle 2, level 4) is a 2 year full-time graduate study program of 120 ECTS credits (4 semesters, 30 ECTS each semester). Students generally take 90 ECTS in specialized courses and a 30 ECTS thesis. In
Staff Guide to Qualification and Level Descriptors for Taught Programmes Issued by the Quality Assurance and Enhancement Unit August 2009 1. Overview This document is designed to assist staff in programme
2012/2013 Programme Specification Data Programme Name Programme Number Programme Award QAA Subject Benchmark Statements Strategic Marketing Communications P10205 MA N/A Programme Aims Our graduates will;
Erich R. Utz Modelling and Measurement Methods of Operational Risk in Banking Herbert Utz Verlag München Schriftenreihe für angewandtes Management herausgegeben von Prof. Dr. Dr. Christian Werner, Fachhochschule
Ph. D. Program in Education Specialization: Educational Leadership School of Education College of Human Sciences Iowa State University The purpose of the doctoral program in Educational Leadership is to
Upgrading Your Skills to MCSA Windows Server 2012 MOC 20417 In dieser Schulung lernen Sie neue Features und Funktionalitäten in Windows Server 2012 in Bezug auf das Management, die Netzwerkinfrastruktur,
Doctor of Clinical Psychology Programme of study for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology 1. The following may be accepted as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology: Graduates
Public Health Foundations Core This module builds upon the nine core competencies of Public Health Practice set out by the Faculty of Public Health UK. The English NHS will form the central empirical case
Outcome Analysis of Bachelor and Master Curricula in Electrical Engineering and Computing Hans-Ulrich Heiss #1, Cornelia Raue *2 # School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, TU Berlin Einsteinufer
SPICE auf der Überholspur Vergleich von ISO (TR) 15504 und Automotive SPICE Historie Software Process Improvement and Capability determination 1994 1995 ISO 15504 Draft SPICE wird als Projekt der ISO zur
Further Education: General and Programme Requirements for the Accreditation of Teacher Education Qualifications In accordance with Section 38 of the Teaching Council Act, 2001 and Regulation Five of the
Abstract Recovery of full cost and pricing of water in the Water Framework Directive D. Assimacopoulos Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, NTUA The Water Framework Directive (EC 2000/60) introduces
International Engineering Alliance Washington Accord Sydney Accord Dublin Accord Engineers Mobility Forum Engineering Technologists Mobility Forum Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies Version
National Occupational Standards National Occupational Standards for Youth Work Contents Introduction 5 Section 1 S1.1.1 Enable young people to use their learning to enhance their future development 6 S1.1.2
Contributions to Management Science Supply Chain and Logistics in National, International and Governmental Environment Concepts and Models Bearbeitet von Reza Zanjirani Farahani, Nasrin Asgari, Hoda Davarzani
Usability Evaluation of Modeling Languages Bearbeitet von Christian Schalles 1. Auflage 2012. Taschenbuch. XXIII, 183 S. Paperback ISBN 978 3 658 00050 9 Format (B x L): 0 x 0 cm Gewicht: 275 g Weitere
August 2009 Curriculum Bachelor of International Sales and Marketing Management Professionsbachelor i international handel og markedsføring Contents Contents... 1 Section 1: General... 3 1 The Course...
Study program Faculty Cycle Software Engineering and Telecommunication (120 ЕCTS) Contemporary Sciences and Technologies Postgraduate ECTS 120 Offered in Tetovo Description of the program This master study
An Coláiste Ollscoile Baile Átha Cliath National University of Ireland, Dublin Ollscoil na héireann, Baile Átha Cliath Regional & Urban Planning Session 2004/05 2 Regional and Urban Planning Contents Introduction:...4
Produktfamilienentwicklung Bericht über die ITEA-Projekte ESAPS, CAFÉ und Families Günter Böckle Siemens CT SE 3 Motivation Drei große ITEA Projekte über Produktfamilien- Engineering: ESAPS (1.7.99 30.6.01),
THE FACULTY OF LAW THE STANDARD FOR DOCTORAL DEGREES IN LAW AT THE FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ Guidelines for the Faculty of Law in Tromsø, adopted by the Faculty Board on 31 May 2010. 1 Background
Exploring the directions and methods of business development A comparative multiple-case study on Ikea and Vodafone Michal Štefan Aalborg University Master thesis for MSc. in International Business Economics
STRATEGIC PLAN 2012-2017 OUR MISSION The mission of the USC Rossier School of Education is to improve learning in urban education locally, nationally and globally. Urban education takes place within many
College of Psychology and Humanistic Studies (PHS) Curriculum Learning Goals and PsyD Program Learning Goals, Objectives and Competencies (GOCs) College of PHS Learning Goals PsyD Program Learning Goals
DoD CIVILIAN LEADER DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK COMPETENCY DEFINITIONS Leading Change Definition: This core competency involves the ability to bring about strategic change, both within and outside the organization,
Module 1 Introduction to Business Education (6 ECTS) F01 BE01 I) Basic ideas and fundamental theories of Educational Sciences Introduction to the Study of Learning Behaviourism Information Processing Theory
Programme Regulations 2015 16 Business Administration with pathways in Human Resource Management, International Business and Marketing BSc Important document please read This document contains important
Theoretical Underpinnings Wolfgang Jonas Rosan Chow 1 What is MAPS? MAPS stands for Matching ANALYSIS PROJECTION SYNTHESIS. MAPS is an intelligent, knowledge-supported online community tool for systematic
Sustaining the Benefits of Action Research in Decision Support Tools Development: Lessons from an Urban Water Utility in Africa Frank Kizito * National Water and Sewerage Corporation Kampala, Uganda Extended
, Territorial págs. Planning 383-388 for the Management of Risk in Europe TERRITORIAL PLANNING FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RISK IN EUROPE Mark Fleischhauer, Stefan Greiving & Sylvia Wanczura Universität Dortmund
HR SLA Page 1 of 9 Communicating and influencing I communicate confidently, professionally, authoritatively and with clarity both verbally and in writing. I use a range of effective communication skills
Experiential Education as a Best Practice Pedagogy for Environmental Education in Teacher Education Volume 1 Barry Law B.PE. M.Ed (Distinction) Dip Tchg Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the
Department 3 Business Studies for Echange Students at HT Berlin Overview of courses lectured in English 25 October 2013 Business Studies for Echange Students in English - (undergraduates) I 1 International
Awards Standards - Generic Higher Education and Training www.qqi.ie July 2014/HS4 QQI Generic Standards The Qualifications (Education & Training) Act 1999 required the Higher Education and Training Awards
Programme Specification Title: Accountancy and Finance Final Award: Bachelor of Arts with Honours (BA (Hons)) With Exit Awards at: Certificate of Higher Education (CertHE) Diploma of Higher Education (DipHE)
INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PROCESS AND THEORY ALLEN F. REPKO The University of Texas at Arlington SAGE Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Detailed Contents Preface Acknowledgments About
Australian ssociation Practice Standards for Social Workers: Achieving Outcomes of Social Workers Australian Association of Social Workers September 2003 Contents Page Introduction... 3 Format of the Standards...
Verfahrenstechnik und Chemieingenieurwesen Qualification Frames and Curricula for Degree Courses for Process Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Biomolecular or Bioprocess Engineering at Universities
Article by Peter Mihailidis, Rad Miletich and Adel Khreich: Peter Mihailidis is an Associate Director with bluevisions, a project and program management consultancy based in Milsons Point in Sydney. Peter
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE Educational Leadership Doctor of Philosophy Degree Major Course Requirements EDU710 (3.0 credit hours) Ethical and Legal Issues in Education/Leadership This course is an intensive