arxiv:condmat/ v2 [condmat.meshall] 3 Jul 2007


 Louise Collins
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Generation of Spin Entanglement in Nonequilibrium Quantum Dots arxiv:conmat/612452v2 [conmat.meshall] 3 Jul 27 Stefan Legel, 1 Jürgen König, 2 Guio Burkar, 3,4 an Ger Schön 1 1 Institut für Theoretische Festkörperphysik an DFGCenter for Functional Nanostructures (CFN), Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany 2 Institut für Theoretische Physik III, RuhrUniversität Bochum, 4478 Bochum, Germany 3 Department of Physics an Astronomy, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH456 Basel, Switzerlan 4 Institut für Theoretische Physik C, RWTH Aachen, D5256 Aachen, Germany (Date: February 5, 28) We propose schemes for generating spatiallyseparate spin entanglement in systems of two quantum ots with onsite Coulomb repulsion weakly couple to a joint electron reservoir. An enhance probability for the formation of spin entanglement is foun in nonequilibrium situations with one extra electron on each ot, either in the transient state after rapi changes of the gate voltage, or in the steay state with applie bias voltage. In both cases socalle Werner states with with spin singlet fielity exceeing 1/2 are generate, which inicates entanglement. PACS numbers: 3.67.Mn,73.23.Hk,73.21.La,73.63.Kv I. INTRODUCTION The entanglement of quantum states is one of the cornerstones of quantum information processing. 1 Entangle photons have been use in experiments in quantum communication an cryptography. 2 For electrons in a solistate environment recent progress has been linke to avances in fabrication technology for nanoscale evices. 3,4 The availability of an electron spin entangler in a solistate environment woul allow the implementation of quantum communication schemes with electron spins. 5,6 Several schemes have been suggeste for the prouction of spatiallyseparate entangle electrons in soli state systems. Many of them rely on extracting the entangle electrons of a Cooper pair from a superconuctor an separate them into two normal leas, 7 Luttinger liquis, 8 or to two leas through two quantum ots. 9 Others are base on separating the electrons forming a spin singlet on a oublequantum ot, 1 using interference effects in a quantum ot in the cotunneling regime, 11 separating a pair of entangle electrons from a singlet state by a triple quantum ot, 12 or scattering off magnetic impurities. 13 In this article we show that a pair of entangle electrons can be create by riving out of equilibrium a system of two quantum ots with onsite Coulomb repulsion an weak coupling to a joint electron reservoir. Specifically we consier the two setups epicte in Fig. 1. Electrons enter the ots from the reservoirs, an we consier the nonequilibrium state with one electron on each ot. In setup a) we stuy the transient behavior after quickly pushing the ot levels from above to below the Fermi energy of the lea, an fin an enhance probability for the singlet state as compare to a triplet. In setup b) we rive the system out of equilibrium by applying a bias voltage between left an right leas. Depening on the polarity of the applie bias, we fin in the steay state an enhance probability of either the singlet or the triplet states. The mixe states with two electrons in FIG. 1: The setups: a) Two quantum ots (u an ) are couple to a joint electron reservoir (L). b) In aition to a), the quantum ots are couple to two inepenent reservoirs (Ru an R) on the right. the two ots represent socalle Werner states. 14 In the case where the electrons entere from the common (left) reservoir we fin regimes where the Werner fielity is larger than 1/2, which implies a high probability for the formation of a singlet state. II. MODEL The Hamiltonian of the system is H = H ots + H leas + H tunnel. (1) The two quantum ots, i = u, (up an own), escribe by H ots = [ ] ε i c iσ c iσ + U c i c i c i c i, (2) i σ contain each a single, spinegenerate energy level ε i. In general the ot levels are etune by ε = ε u ε. We assume strong Coulomb repulsion within each ot, U k B T, ev, Γ which suppresses ouble occupancy of each
2 2 ot. (Our analysis can be generalize to finite interot charging energy, which oes not change the conclusions qualitatively.) The leas H leas = ε rk a rkσ a rkσ, (3) r kσ with r = L, R u, R, serve as equilibrium reservoirs with electrochemical potentials µ r. The tunneling between leas an ots is moele by H tunnel = ( ) t ri c iσ a rkσ + h.c.. (4) r kσi The tunneling strength of quantum ot i to reservoir r is parametrize by Γ ri = 2π t 2 ri N r, where N r enotes the reservoir ensity of states, an we chose a gauge in which all the tunnel amplitues t ri are real. We further efine Γ r i Γ ri/2. For setup a) we have Γ Ru = Γ R =. Our proposal is base on the observation that the states in the common left lea are only couple to a certain linear combination of the two quantum ot states. If Coulomb interaction were absent, U =, filling the ouble ot with two electrons with opposite spin from the common reservoir woul lea to the prouct state ( t Lu c uσ + t Lc σ ) ( t Lu c u σ + t L c σ ) = t 2 Lu σ σ, + t Lu t L ( σ, σ σ, σ ) + t 2 L, σ σ. For strong Coulomb repulsion, however, the parts that involve ouble occupancy of either ot are projecte out, an the final state is, σ, σ σ, σ, no prouct state but a spin singlet. No triplet component, although energetically egenerate to the singlet, is generate. In realistic situations various mechanisms will relax the imbalance between the population of spin singlet an triplet states, e.g., tunnel coupling to the right reservoirs shown in Fig. 1b), or a finite etuning ε. Furthermore, a coupling to an external bath which meiates spinflip processes or creates a phase ifference between the ot states causes an equilibration between singlet an triplet. In this article, we stuy in etail nonequilibrium scenarios characterize by the competition between the creation of singlet an triplet states an the relaxation. III. KINETIC EQUATIONS For this purpose we employ the realtime iagrammatic technique evelope for single quantum ots 15 an extene to multiot systems. 16,17 In this technique the electronic egrees of freeom of the leas are integrate out, which results in an effective escription in terms of the egrees of freeom of the ot subsystem only. The ynamics of the latter is then escribe by a reuce ensity matrix with elements p χ χ χ, where χ an χ χ label the oubleot states, an... enotes quantum statistical expectation values. In the present case, the Hilbert space of the quantumot egrees of freeom is spanne by 9 basis states χ u, χ, with χ i {,, } enoting the occupation of ot i. The time evolution of the reuce ensity matrix in the Markovian limit is governe by the kinetic equations 15 t pχ χ + i(e χ E χ)p χ χ = W χ χ χχ χ χ pχ χ. (5) The energy ifference E χ E χ between states χ an χ leas to a timeepenent phase of the offiagonal matrix elements. Transitions ue to the tunnel coupling to the leas are escribe by the kernels W χ χ χχ, the general form of which are given in Refs. 15,16. In the following we restrict our attention to the limit of weak coupling an small etuning ε, where it is sufficient to evaluate the kernels in first orer in the tunneling strength Γ ri an to zeroth orer in ε. To procee it is convenient to switch to a basis { χ } which reflects the symmetries of the problem. One of the basis states is the emptyots state,. For two electrons, one in each ot, the natural basis states are the spin singlet S (,, )/ 2 an triplet states T +,, T (, +, )/ 2, an T,. The states with one electron in the ouble ot can be characterize by the physical spin σ of the electron, as well as by an isospin efine in the 2 imensional Hilbert space spanne by the two orbital ot levels. One natural quantization axis n for the isospin operator I σ is the one in which the eigenstates of I σ n are + Iσ n σ, an Iσ n, σ, corresponing to the electron in ot u an, respectively. This is motivate by the observation that both the Coulomb interaction an the etuning ε in the Hamiltonian is iagonal in this isospin basis. An alternative choice is the axis m efine by + Iσ m (t Lu σ, + t L, σ )/ t 2 Lu + t2 L an Iσ m (t L σ, t Lu, σ )/ t 2 Lu + t2 L. This reflects the fact that filling the ouble ot by tunneling with one electron from the left lea generates the isospin component + Iσ m only. 18 In this sense, the left lea can, in analogy to magnetism, be viewe as a fully isospinpolarize lea with only + isospinelectron states available. The right reservoirs in setup b), on the other han, correspon to an isospinunpolarize lea. In general, the two axes n an m are not orthogonal, except for the symmetric case when the tunneling strengths to ot u an are equal, as can be seen from n m = (Γ Lu Γ L )/(Γ Lu + Γ L ). The total Hamiltonian is invariant uner rotations in spin space, i.e., spin is a conserve quantum number. Spin symmetry implies I = I I/2 as well as p T = p T = p T+ p T /3, which reuces the number of inepenent ensity matrix elements. Those are the isospin I an p = (p, p 1, p S, p T ), where p 1 iσ p iσ is the probability for single occupation. In this representation, the kinetic equations rea
3 3 t p = r=l,r Γ r [ t I = Γ L 2f L p + r=l,r 4 f r 1 f r 2 2f L 4 f r 1 f r 2 2f r 2 2f r 2 + 4f f r / f r p + Γ L 1 L f (I m) + 2Γ L f L L 1 3f r / f r 3f L ( f L 1 [ ] fl2 )p 1 + (1 f L )p S (1 f L )p T ]m + Γ L 2 p 1 2(1 f L )p S n(m n) (I n)(m n) Γ r (1 + f r )I + ε(n I), (6) where f r = [1 + exp(β(ε µ r ))] 1 is the Fermi istribution of the electrons in lea r. Here we introuce, apart from the etuning ε also the average ε = (ε u + ε )/2 of the ot energies. The level etuning is renormalize[ by( the) tunneling ( an given )] by ε = ε ΓLu Γ L 2π ln βd 1 2π ReΨ 2 + i β(ε µl) 2π, where D is an highenergy cutoff provie by either Coulomb interaction U or banwith of the leas. IV. RESULTS A. Spin Entanglement in Transient States Inspection of Eqs. (6) reveals how an imbalance of singlet an triplet states can occur. When filling the empty ouble ot with one electron, a finite isospin along m is generate. This in turn, blocks the generation of triplet states as oppose to singlet states when filling the ouble ot with a secon electron. This mechanism becomes most transparent for Γ Lu = Γ L, Γ Ru = Γ R = an ε =. In this case, the two equations t p T = 3Γ L f L ( p1 2 I m ) 2Γ L (1 f L )p T (7) ( p1 ) ( t 2 I m p1 ) = 3Γ L f L 2 I m +2Γ L (1 f L )p T, (8) ecouple from the rest. This motivates proposal a) for generating spatiallyseparate spin entanglement. If we prepare the system in an empty state (by tuning the ot levels well above the Fermi energy of the lea) an, then, suenly push the ot levels well below the Fermi energy of the left lea, ε k B T, Γ L, the ouble ot will be charge with two electrons that form a spin singlet, while no triplet component appears. The time epenence of the singlet generation is illustrate in Fig. 2. Coupling to an external bath, which flips the spin of an electron or generates a relative phase between the, an, states, inuces relaxation from the singlet to the triplet state. To moel these processes we introuce phenomenologic relaxation rates Γ S T, Γ S T±, Γ T S, Γ T± S, Γ T T ±, an Γ T± T. To be specific, we choose p S (t) F(t) i) ii) iii) iv) p T (t) FIG. 2: Upper panels: time evolution of the probabilities for a singlet an a triplet state. Lower panel: the corresponing Werner fielity. For the perfectly symmetric setup, ε =, Γ Lu = Γ L, in the absence of spin relaxation, Γ S T =, curve i), we fin F 1. The Werner fielity is reuce for either ii) nonegenerate ot energy levels, ε = Γ L, iii) asymmetric coupling Γ L =.1 Γ Lu, iv) a finite spin relaxation rate Γ S T =.2 Γ L. The highenergy cutoff is set to D = 1 k BT. all of them to be equal, such that we get an effective transition rate Γ S T = Γ T S /3 which conserves the symmetry between the triplets, p T± = p T. (A ifferent choice of these parameters oes not change the conclusions qualitatively.) Furthermore, a finite etuning ε an/or finite asymmetry of the tunnel couplings Γ Lu Γ L, lea to a mixture of singlet an triplet states, proucing a Werner state 14 escribe by the ensity matrix W(F) = F S S + (1 F) 11 4 S S 3. (9) The parameter F efines the Werner fielity. Werner states play a crucial role in entanglement purification protocols, 19,2 an the Werner fielity gives a convenient
4 4 total charge initial triplet initial singlet F Γ R = 2 Γ L Γ R = Γ L Γ R =.5 Γ L.4.2 p S + p T ev/k B T ev/k B T FIG. 3: Time evolution of the total charge uring the ischarging of an initial singlet state compare to an initial triplet state. The system is assume to be perfectly symmetric, Γ Lu = Γ L, ε =. Starting from a singlet the system empties quickly, but it remains singly occupie if we start from a triplet state. FIG. 4: The stationary Werner fielity F vs. bias voltage for ε = an ifferent ratios of the coupling strengths, Γ R/Γ L = 2, 1,.5. The bias is applie symmetrically, µ L = ev/2 = µ Ru = µ R. The inset shows the corresponing stationary overall probabilities p S+p T to fin the system oubly occupie. measure for the possibility to extract entangle states from a set of Werner states by such protocols. It has been further shown that for Werner fielity 1/2 < F 1 there exist purification protocols to extract states with arbitrary large entanglement whereas for F 1/2 the Werner state has to be consiere as unentangle. Solving the kinetic equations for the reuce ensity matrix for system a) we see that Werner states with fielity F = p S /(p S + p T ) > 1/2 are accessible also for asymmetric tunneling, etuning an finite spinflip relaxation, see Fig. 2. For weak etuning ε the probability to generate a triplet scales with p T ( ε/2γ L ) 2. To create an etect an enhance spinsinglet fielity an to measure the relaxation time between singlet an triplet we propose the following scheme that is similar to the experiment performe in Ref. 3. (i) Prepare the system in an empty state. (ii) Push quickly (i.e. on a time scale faster than both the relaxation times for the isospinpolarize state an for the singlettriplet transitions) the ot levels own well below the Fermi level. As explaine above the ouble ot will preferably fill up with two electrons forming a spin singlet. (iii) Wait some given time T. As a function of T, the imbalance between singlet an triplet ecays exponentially on the time scale given by the relaxation rate, an the Werner fielity is reuce, see Fig. 2. To prove that the obtaine state, inee, has an enhance Werner fielity, we analyze how the ouble ot is eplete. Depening on whether the initial state is a singlet or triplet, it is possible or impossible to extract the two electrons by tunneling to the common left lea. This can be seen by realizing that (t Lu c uσ + t L c σ )(t Lu c u σ + t L c σ )( σ, σ σ, σ ) = (1 ± 1)t Lu t L is finite for the singlet but vanishes for the triplet state, i.e., only one of the two electrons form ing the triplet can leave. As a consequence, the propose protocol continues in the following way. (iv) Push the ot levels up well above the Fermi level quickly (again faster than the relaxation rate for the isospinpolarize state). (v) Wait some time larger than 1/Γ L but shorter than the relaxation time of the isospinpolarize state. (vi) Measure the total charge on the ouble ot. If the charge is zero then the oublyoccupie state was a spin singlet, whereas if the measure charge is one, it was a triplet. To illustrate this we show in Fig. 3 the total oubleot charge as a function of time for the two cases that the ouble ot initially accommoate a singlet or a triplet, respectively. The measurement of the total charge on the ouble ot coul be performe by a closeby quantumpoint contact. This oes not introuce an aitional relaxation mechanism for either the isospin or the singlet an triplet states as the quantumpoint contact is only sensitive to the total charge. B. Spin Entanglement for Finite Bias Voltage Spatiallyseparate spin entanglement is foun also in a steaystate situation in the setup b) of Fig. 1. Here we consier the system to be riven out of equilibrium by a bias voltage between the left an the right sie. To keep the iscussion transparent we assume in the following symmetric couplings, Γ Lu = Γ L Γ L an Γ Ruu = Γ R Γ R, equal electrochemical potentials in the right leas µ Ru = µ R, an vanishing etuning of the ot levels ε =. The leas on the right han sie couple to all isospin components in the same way. In a magnetic analogue such a situation correspons to a ot couple to one ferromagnetic an one nonmagnetic lea
5 5 for which, at large bias voltage, spin accumulation occurs. Similarly, in the present moel a finite isospin is accumulate in the ouble ot in the stationary limit. This, again, leas to an imbalance of singlet an triplet state probabilities. The polarity of the bias voltage etermines whether the Werner fielity is larger or smaller than 1/4. If the bias voltage is applie such that the ouble ot is charge from the left an echarge to the right lea the isospin polarization is in + irection, an singlets are preferre. In this regime the Werner fielity saturates at F = (3 Γ L + 2 Γ R )/(6 Γ L + 2 Γ R ) which goes from 1/2 for Γ L Γ R to 1 for Γ L Γ R. We have to remark that the fielity approaches 1 only linearly for Γ L Γ R, whereas the overall probability to fin the oubleot system oubly occupie vanishes quaratically p S +p T 2 (Γ L /Γ R ) 2 at the same time. If the bias voltage is applie in the opposite irection, triplets are more likely. V. CONCLUSIONS For an experimental realization of our proposal one nees to coherently couple two quantum ots to a joint reservoir, as has been emonstrate e.g. in Ref. 21. The spatial separation of the two ots is only limite by the phasecoherence length, which can be several micrometer in typical semiconuctor structures. The formation of an enhance spinsinglet fielity requires tunneling rates larger than the spin ecoherence time. Reporte values 3,22 of T2 of the orer of 1 ns correspon to a lower limit of Γ of the orer of µev. For tunnel couplings Γ larger than k B T higherorer processes such as cotunneling an Konoassiste tunneling become important. These are neglecte in our quantitative analysis but they o not change our preiction qualitatively. In fact, for symmetric tunnel couplings the Hamiltonian acquires a block structure an the Hilbert subspace containing the triplet states ecouples completely from the one for the empty ouble ot. In conclusion, the experimental realization of our proposal shoul be feasible by nowaays technology. In summary, we propose two schemes for the generation of spin entanglement between two spatially separate electrons in a oubleot system riven out of equilibrium. The unerlying mechanism is funamentally ifferent from those that rely on a singlettriplet energy splitting, where entanglement is generate by a relaxation of the system to the spinentangle groun state. In contrast, we suggest two schemes in which entanglement is a consequence of a coherent coupling of two quantum ots to one common lea in combination with a strong onsite Coulomb interaction to prevent ouble occupancy of each iniviual ot. We emphasize that our proposal oes not require a finite singlettriplet splitting. The quick formation of the entangle state on a time scale given by the tunneling instea of a singlettriplet relaxation rate, may be an avantage in the context of quantum information processing. We acknowlege useful iscussions with P.W. Brouwer, J. Weis, J. Martinek, Y. Gefen, T. Löfwaner, an E. Praa. This work was supporte by the Lanesstiftung BaenWürttemberg via the Kompetenznetz Funktionelle Nanostrukturen, DFG via GRK 726 an SFB 491, the Swiss SNF an NCCR Nanoscience, as well as by NSF uner grant PHY C.H. Bennett an D.P. DiVincenzo, Nature 44, 247 (2). 2 N. Gisin, G. Ribory, W. Tittel, an H. Zbinen, Rev. Mo. Phys. 74, 145 (22). 3 J.R. Petta, A.C. Johnson, J.M. Taylor, E.A. Lair, A. Yacoby, M.D. Lukin, C.M. Marcus, M.P. Hanson, A.C. Gossar, Science 39, 218 (25). 4 F.H.L. Koppens, C. Buizert, K.J. Tielrooij, I.T. Vink, K.C. Nowack, T. Meunier, L.P. Kouwenhoven, L.M.K. Vanersypen, Nature 442, 766 (26). 5 G. Burkar, D. Loss, an E.V. Sukhorukov, Phys. Rev. B 61, R1633 (2). 6 G. Burkar an D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 8793 (23). 7 G.B. Lesovik, T. Martin, an G. Blatter, Eur. Phys. J. B 24, 287 (21). 8 P. Recher an D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 65, (22); C. Bena, S. Vishveshwara, L. Balents, an M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 3791 (22). 9 P. Recher, E.V. Sukhorukov, an D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B 63, (21). 1 M. Blaauboer an D.P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 1642 (25). 11 W.D. Oliver, F. Yamaguchi, an Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 3791 (22). 12 D.S. Saraga an D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, (23). 13 A.T. Costa an S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, (21); F. Ciccarello, G.M. Palma, M. Zaracone, Y. Omar, an V.R. Vieira, quantph/ R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 4, 4277 (1989). 15 J. König, H. Schoeller, an G. Schön, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1715 (1996); J. König, J. Schmi, H. Schoeller, an G. Schön, Phys. Rev. B 54, 1682 (1996). 16 J. König an Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3855 (21); Phys. Rev. B 65, (22). 17 T. Pohjola, H. Schoeller, an G. Schön, Europhys. Lett. 54, 241 (21). 18 Such an isospin also plays an important role in the context of coherent population trapping, visible e.g. in the full counting statistics of tripleot system, C.W. Groth, B. Michaelis, an C.W.J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 74, (26). 19 C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, an W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996). 2 N. Linen, S. Massar, an S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett.
6 6 81, 3279 (1998). 21 A.W. Holleitner, C.R. Decker, H. Qin, K. Eberl, an R. H. Blick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, (21); N.J. Craig, J.M. Taylor, E.A. Lester, C.M. Marcus, M.P. Hanson, A.C. Gossar, Science 34, 565 (24); M. Sigrist, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, D. Loss, M. Reinwal, an W. Wegscheier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 3684 (26). 22 F.H.L. Koppens, J.A. Folk, J.M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L.H. Willems van Beveren, I.T. Vink, H.P. Tranitz, W. Wegscheier, L.P. Kouwenhoven, L.M.K. Vanersypen, Science 39, 1346 (25).
Definition of the spin current: The angular spin current and its physical consequences
Definition of the spin current: The angular spin current an its physical consequences Qingfeng Sun 1, * an X. C. Xie 2,3 1 Beijing National Lab for Conense Matter Physics an Institute of Physics, Chinese
More informationAn Introduction to Eventtriggered and Selftriggered Control
An Introuction to Eventtriggere an Selftriggere Control W.P.M.H. Heemels K.H. Johansson P. Tabuaa Abstract Recent evelopments in computer an communication technologies have le to a new type of largescale
More informationCompact Routing on InternetLike Graphs
Compact Routing on InternetLike Graphs Dmitri Krioukov Email: ima@krioukov.net Kevin Fall Intel Research, Berkeley Email: kfall@intelresearch.net Xiaowei Yang Massachusetts Institute of Technology Email:
More informationNew Trade Models, New Welfare Implications
New Trae Moels, New Welfare Implications Marc J. Melitz Harvar University, NBER an CEPR Stephen J. Reing Princeton University, NBER an CEPR August 13, 2014 Abstract We show that enogenous firm selection
More informationMathematical Models of Therapeutical Actions Related to Tumour and Immune System Competition
Mathematical Moels of Therapeutical Actions Relate to Tumour an Immune System Competition Elena De Angelis (1 an PierreEmmanuel Jabin (2 (1 Dipartimento i Matematica, Politecnico i Torino Corso Duca egli
More informationWhich Networks Are Least Susceptible to Cascading Failures?
Which Networks Are Least Susceptible to Cascaing Failures? Larry Blume Davi Easley Jon Kleinberg Robert Kleinberg Éva Taros July 011 Abstract. The resilience of networks to various types of failures is
More information1 HighDimensional Space
Contents HighDimensional Space. Properties of HighDimensional Space..................... 4. The HighDimensional Sphere......................... 5.. The Sphere an the Cube in Higher Dimensions...........
More informationParameterized Algorithms for dhitting Set: the Weighted Case Henning Fernau. Univ. Trier, FB 4 Abteilung Informatik 54286 Trier, Germany
Parameterize Algorithms for Hitting Set: the Weighte Case Henning Fernau Trierer Forschungsberichte; Trier: Technical Reports Informatik / Mathematik No. 086, July 2008 Univ. Trier, FB 4 Abteilung Informatik
More informationAdverse Selection in Annuity Markets: Evidence from the British Life Annuity Act of 1808
Averse Selection in Annuity Markets: Evience from the British Life Annuity Act of 1808 Casey G. Rothschil December 21, 2007 Abstract We look for evience of averse selection using ata from an 1808 Act of
More information11 The Kondo Effect. Frithjof B. Anders Theoretische Physik II Technische Universität Dortmund. Contents
11 The Kondo Effect Frithjof B. Anders Theoretische Physik II Technische Universität Dortmund Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Resistance minimum............................... 3 1.2 Anderson model..................................
More informationRate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability
Rate control for communication networks: shaow prices, proportional fairness an stability F Kelly, AK Maulloo an DKH Tan University of Cambrige, UK This paper analyses the stability an fairness of two
More informationA SPATIAL UNIT LEVEL MODEL FOR SMALL AREA ESTIMATION
REVSTAT Statistical Journal Volume 9, Number 2, June 2011, 155 180 A SPATIAL UNIT LEVEL MODEL FOR SMALL AREA ESTIMATION Authors: Pero S. Coelho ISEGI Universiae Nova e Lisboa, Portugal Faculty of Economics,
More informationCrossOver Analysis Using TTests
Chapter 35 CrossOver Analysis Using ests Introuction his proceure analyzes ata from a twotreatment, twoperio (x) crossover esign. he response is assume to be a continuous ranom variable that follows
More informationSingleElectron Devices and Their Applications
SingleElectron Devices and Their Applications KONSTANTIN K. LIKHAREV, MEMBER, IEEE Invited Paper The goal of this paper is to review in brief the basic physics of singleelectron devices, as well as their
More informationEntanglement analysis of atomic processes and quantum registers
Entanglement analysis of atomic processes and quantum registers InauguralDissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Dr. rer. nat. vorgelegt beim Fachbereich Naturwissenschaften
More informationQuantum Point Contacts
SEMICONDUCTORS AND SEMIMETALS VOL 35 CHAPTER 2 Quantum Point Contacts H. van Hauten and C. W. J. Beenakker PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES EINDHOVEN THE NETHERL \NDS B J. van Wees DEPARTMENT OE APPLIED PHYSICS
More informationThe Hamiltonian Mean Field Model: From Dynamics to Statistical Mechanics and Back
The Hamiltonian Mean Field Model: From Dynamics to Statistical Mechanics and Back Thierry Dauxois 1, Vito Latora 2, Andrea Rapisarda 2, Stefano Ruffo 1,3, and Alessandro Torcini 3,4 1 Laboratoire de Physique,
More information1 OneDimensional Magnetism
1 OneDimensional Magnetism HansJürgen Mikeska 1 and Alexei K. Kolezhuk 1,2 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Hannover, Appelstaße 2, 30167 Hannover, Germany, mikeska@itp.unihannover.de
More informationPhysik Department. Matrix Product Formalism
Physik Department Matrix Product Formalism Diplomarbeit von María Gracia Eckholt Perotti Angefertigt an der Technische Universität München und am MaxPlanckInstitut für Quantenoptik Garching, September
More informationIrreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process
R. Landauer Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process Abstract: It is argued that computing machines inevitably involve devices which perform logical functions that do not have a singlevalued
More informationCurrent Status of TransitionState Theory
J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 1277112800 12771 Current Status of TransitionState Theory Donald G. Truhlar* Department of Chemistry and Supercomputer Institute, UniVersity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
More informationChapter 10 Electronic Wavefunctions Must Also Possess Proper Symmetry. These Include Angular Momentum and Point Group Symmetries
Chapter 10 Electronic Wavefunctions Must Also Possess Proper Symmetry. These Include Angular Momentum and Point Group Symmetries I. Angular Momentum Symmetry and Strategies for Angular Momentum Coupling
More informationMaster Thesis OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS USING CHAOTIC CARRIERS GENERATED BY ELECTROOPTICAL FEEDBACK DEVICES
UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS Master Thesis OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS USING CHAOTIC CARRIERS GENERATED BY ELECTROOPTICAL FEEDBACK DEVICES Author: Romain Modeste NGUIMDO Supervisor: Pere COLET RAFECAS
More informationOBSTACLES ON THE WAY TOWARDS THE QUANTIZATION OF SPACE, TIME AND MATTER and possible resolutions
SPIN2000/20 OBSTACLES ON THE WAY TOWARDS THE QUANTIZATION OF SPACE, TIME AND MATTER and possible resolutions Gerard t Hooft Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Utrecht, Princetonplein 5 3584
More informationBOSCH. CAN Specification. Version 2.0. 1991, Robert Bosch GmbH, Postfach 30 02 40, D70442 Stuttgart
CAN Specification Version 2.0 1991, Robert Bosch GmbH, Postfach 30 02 40, D70442 Stuttgart CAN Specification 2.0 page 1 Recital The acceptance an introuction of serial communication to more an more applications
More informationDatabasefriendly random projections: JohnsonLindenstrauss with binary coins
Journal of Computer an System Sciences 66 (2003) 671 687 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcss Databasefrienly ranom projections: JohnsonLinenstrauss with binary coins Dimitris Achlioptas Microsoft Research,
More informationNot Seeing is Also Believing: Combining Object and Metric Spatial Information
Not Seeing is Also Believing: Combining Object and Metric Spatial Information Lawson L.S. Wong, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, and Tomás LozanoPérez Abstract Spatial representations are fundamental to mobile
More informationBreakdown of Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium...
II Stellar Atmospheres Copyright (2003) George W. Collins, II 15 Breakdown of Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium... Thus far we have made considerable use of the concepts of equilibrium. In the stellar interior,
More informationFirst Draft of a Report on the EDVAC
First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC by John von Neumann Contract No. W 670 ORD 4926 Between the United States Army Ordnance Department and the University of Pennsylvania Moore School of Electrical Engineering
More informationWMR Control Via Dynamic Feedback Linearization: Design, Implementation, and Experimental Validation
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2002 835 WMR Control Via Dynamic Feedback Linearization: Design, Implementation, and Experimental Validation Giuseppe Oriolo, Member,
More information