1 International Civil Aviation Organization SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 South American Regional Office 05/02/15 Seventh Multilateral Meeting of the SAM Región for the transition from AIS to AIM (SAM/AIM/7) Lima,, 23 to 27 March 2015 Agenda Item 3: Implementation of the Quality Management System in AIM units GREPECAS Project G3 Implementation of the Quality Management System in AIM units (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY This working paper presents, for consideration of the Meeting, the status of implementation of GREPECAS Project G3 for the implementation of the quality in aeronautical information services. It also requires the update of the implementation data of the States. References: Annex 15 to the Convention of International Civil Aviation SAM/AIM Multilateral Meetings ICAO Strategic Objetives: A - Safety B - Air navigation capacity and efficiency E Environmental protection 1 Background 1.1 SAM/AIM meetings have developed a robust and well-founded quality implementation Project in which all the deliverables of the Project have been accomplished. 1.2 States have received all the deliverables, including the six documented procedures of standard ISO 9001:2008, which were developed under the administration of Mr. and the SAM/AIM meeting team, and that represent the essential guidance material for the preparation for the certification. 1.3 The delays of some States adversely impact in the Region for the conclusion of Phase 1 of the Roadmap for the Transition from AIS to AIM. 2 Analysis 2.1 Project G3 - Implementation of the Quality Management System in AIM units : As presented in Appendix A, significant progress has been achieved with regard to the completion of all the deliverable results of the Project. Only one activity is pending for the certifications report.
2 SAM/AIM/7-WP/ Analysis of goals achievement based on G3 Project indicators/metrics States certified with QMS ISO 9001: = 4 Estados 2014 = 5 Estados 2.2 Currently, there are five certified States with QMS within the SAM Region: Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, French Guiana and Paraguay. The last update on April 2014 and the progress of each State since 2012 can be observed in the following table: State % of Implementation April 2014 Implementation date % Progress Argentina 50% Sep/ % Bolivia 30% Jul/2015 0% Brazil CERTIFIED Chile CERTIFIED Colombia 90% Sep/ % Ecuador CERTIFIED French Guiana CERTIFIED Guyana 25% Dec/ % Panama 50% Aug/ % Paraguay CERTIFIED % Aug/ % Suriname 45% Aug/ % Uruguay 95% Mar/2015 5% Venezuela 70% Nov/ % 2.3 Currently, from the States that have informed the implementation date for August, September and November 2014, no communication regarding their certification has been received, neither of the status of the implementation plan, nor of the problems encountered during the implementation process. 2.4 More emphasis in the management is required by the experts in order to complete the Certification, which is too far from being a complex process. 2.5 Considering the above, in order to inform the authorities in the meetings of GREPECAS Programmes and Projects Committee, the information regarding the implementation dates should be updated and the reasons for the delay in the programming should be informed, since GREPECAS works under a project management methodology based on results. The latest information received from the States is presented in Appendix B to this working paper. 2.6 States that have not certified QMS in the AIM should present a detailed Action Plan. The experts responsible of the implementation within the AIM Units should consider a detailed description of the tasks, but so far this planning has not been received.
3 - 3 - SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 3. Suggested action: 3.1 The Meeting is invited to: a) update the information regarding the implementation status of the quality system in each State, presented in Appendix B; b) presente a brief report of the reasons for the delay in the implementation; c) present the action plans of the States that have not yet certified the quality and their implementation is under the 80%
4 SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 -A1- APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION (DP) DP N G3 SAM Region Programme Title of the Project Start End AIM Implementation of the quality management systems in the AIM units of SAM States (ICAO Programme Coordinator: Roberto Arca Jáurena) Project coordinator: Experts contributing to the Project: () SAM/AIM IG David Díaz () 03/10/11 01/09/14 Objective Scope Implement guides applicable to the quality management system in a digital/electronic AIM environment in the SAM Region, based on the regional performance objectives of the SAM performance-based implementation plan. The scope of the project contemplates the assessment and identification of implementation levels associated to quality management in AIM services in the Region. Drafting of an action plan and guides for the implementation of QMS in a digital/electronic AIM environment. Metrics Percentage of States with ISO 9001:2008 QMS certification. Goals 50% of States with the ISO standard 9001:2008 implemented by 2013, and certified by Strategy Project activities will be coordinated through communications among project members, the Project Coordinator, and the Programme Coordinator, mainly through teleconferences (GoToMeeting application) and meetings that may be held within other scheduled events, based on the activities of the work programme. The Project Coordinator will coordinate with the Programme Coordinator for the inclusion of additional experts, if warranted by the tasks and work to be performed. The results of the work done will be submitted to the consideration and review of State experts in the form of a final consolidated document for analysis, review, and approval, and for presentation to the GREPECAS PPRC by the Programme Coordinator.
5 -A2- SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 Rationale Related projects The quality management system in AIM services must provide users the required guarantee and assurance that the aeronautical information/data distributed meets quality requirements in terms of accuracy, resolution and integrity. There needs to be a close relationship with other projects in order to collect the operational requirements of the aforementioned applications and their respective tentative dates of implementation. This project is related to Projects G1 Implementation of the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data e-tod and G2 Implementation of Aeronautical Information Exchange Systems (AIXM). Project deliverables Relationship with the performancebased regional plan (PFF) Responsible party Status of implementation* Delivery date Comments Prepare surveys to establish the levels of compliance and implementation of AIM-QMS based on ICAO guides ICAO coordinator 25/11/11 Finalised as scheduled. Circulate surveys to the States ICAO coordinator 17/02/12 Finalised as scheduled. Collect and tabulate the information of the States ICAO coordinator 13/04/12 Finalised on 30/03/12. Description of steps for QMS implementation. SAM/AIM/WG 30/03/12 Finalised as scheduled. QMS selfassessment questionnaire David Diaz RLA/06/901 30/03/12 Finalised as scheduled.
6 SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 -A3- Template with QMS assessment results David Diaz RLA/06/901 30/03/12 Finalised as scheduled. QMS implementation plan David Diaz RLA/06/901 QMS procedures and preventive actions. QMS internal audit procedure. Procedure for controlling AIS service management system records Procedure for drafting QMS documents. Service control procedure QMS non-conforming products. Procedures for controlling the documents of the AIS service management system. SLA with service providers to ensure the quality of the information and the AIM data exchange. Juan J. González Uruguay 19/10/12 Finalised as scheduled.
7 -A4- SAM/AIM/7-WP/05 Collect certifications and produce report on the status of ISO 9001:2008 certifications in the SAM Region ICAO coordinator SAM/AIM Meeting Resources required Designation of experts in the execution of some of the deliverables. More commitment by States to support the designated coordinators and experts. *Grey Green Yellow Red Task not started Activity underway as scheduled Activity started with some delay but expected to be completed on time It has not been possible to implement this activity as scheduled; mitigating measures are required
8 Appendix B to the Report on Agenda Item 3 SAM/AIM/7-NE/05-WP/05 Apéndice B al Informe sobre la Cuestión 3 del Orden del Día 3B-1 APÉNDICE / APPENDIX B ESTADO DE IMPLANTACIÓN DEL QMS EN LA REGIÓN SAM / STATUS OF QMS IMPLEMENTATION IN THE SAM REGION ESTADO/ STATE EN PROCESO/ IN PROCESS IMPLANTADO/ IMPLEMENTED AUDITADO/ AUDITED CERTIFICADO/ CERTIFIED % DE EJECUCIÓN/ % OF EXECUTION FECHA FINAL/ FINAL DATE OBSERVACIONES/ REMARKS Argentina X 50 SEP 2014 Se están identificando y describiendo procesos. / Processes are being identified and described. ARO/AIS Sep Bolivia X 30 JUL 2015 Brasil/ Brazil X X X X NOTAM, AIP y MAP certificado / certified y ARO en proceso / in process. 85% completado / completed Colombia X X X 90 SEP 2014 Actualmente se efectúan auditorías internas de control de la implantación y se ajustan los procedimientos y registros inherentes al proceso AIM. / Currently internal control audits are carried out to control implementation and registrations inherent to AIM are adjusted. Chile X X X ISO 9001:2008
9 Appendix B to the Report on Agenda Item 3 3B-2 Apéndice B al Informe sobre la Cuestión 3 del Orden del Día SAM/AIM/7-NE/05-WP/05 ESTADO/ STATE EN PROCESO/ IN PROCESS IMPLANTADO/ IMPLEMENTED AUDITADO/ AUDITED CERTIFICADO/ CERTIFIED % DE EJECUCIÓN/ % OF EXECUTION FECHA FINAL/ FINAL DATE Ecuador X X X OBSERVACIONES/ REMARKS ISO 9001:2008. En proceso de recertificación para los años 2014 al / ISO 9001:2008. In process of re-certification by 2014 to 2016 Guyana X 25 DIC / DEC 2015 Algo de entrenamiento recibido. / Some training received. Personal temporal. / Temporary Staff. Guayana Francesa / French Guiana X Panamá / Panama X 50 AGO / AUG 2015 Con adquisición de nuevos sistemas automatizados se están efectuando cambios en los procesos y procedimientos. / With the acquisition of new automated systems changes in processes and procedures are being made. Paraguay X X X ISO 9001:2008. Paraguay Re- Certificado 2013 / Paraguay Recertificated Perú / X 60 Suriname X 45 AGO / AUG 2015 AGO / AUG 2014 Se estableció un equipo de trabajo para QMS en el AIM / A work team for QMS has been established at AIM.
10 Appendix B to the Report on Agenda Item 3 SAM/AIM/7-NE/05-WP/05 Apéndice B al Informe sobre la Cuestión 3 del Orden del Día 3B-3 ESTADO/ STATE EN PROCESO/ IN PROCESS IMPLANTADO/ IMPLEMENTED AUDITADO/ AUDITED CERTIFICADO/ CERTIFIED % DE EJECUCIÓN/ % OF EXECUTION FECHA FINAL/ FINAL DATE OBSERVACIONES/ REMARKS Uruguay X 95 MAR 2015 Venezuela X 70 NOV 2014 Información por correo electrónico. / Information through . Fecha de actualización / Date updated: 07/11/2014
PROJECT SOUTH PACIFIC DATA AND INFORMATION NETWORK IN SUPPORT TO INTEGRATED COASTAL AREA MANAGEMENT (SPINCAM) FINAL REPORT December 2011 July 2012 PA/ Contract Nº 4500120859 ADDENDUM Nº2 13/03/2012 Table
Document subject to 4.1 General requirements The organization shall: a) b) establish, document, implement, maintain and improve an EnMS in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard;
EVALUATE AND IMPROVE The WMO Strategy for Service Delivery and Its Implementation Plan DESIGN SERVICES ENGAGE USERS DELIVER WMO-No. 1129 WMO-No. 1129 World Meteorological Organization, 2014 The right of
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Inspector General Office of Audits and Inspections AUDIT REPORT The Department of Energy's Management of Cloud Computing Activities DOE/IG-0918 September 2014 Department
WHO-AIMS WHO-AIMS: REPORT ON MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS IN Latin America and the Caribbean WHO-AIMS:REPORT ON MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Report on the Assessment of Mental Health
Prologue This amendment of The FAA and Industry Guide to Product Certification (CPI Guide) incorporates changes based on lessons learned and supports the broader use of this guide by providing additional
Purpose This quality manual has been prepared to comply with the requirements from the EU ETV pilot programme and the international standard for inspection, ISO/IEC 17020. The quality manual is integrated
UNE ISO 30301. MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FOR RECORDS An implementation example in a fictional company AENOR CTN50/SC1 (translated to English by Cristina Fernández) An Implementation example in a fictional company.
Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews Planning Project Development final report Montana Business Process to Link Planning Studies and NEPA/MEPA Reviews prepared for Montana
Executive Board Hundred and ninety-fourth session 194 EX/22 PARIS, 6 March 2014 Original: English Item 22 of the provisional agenda INTERNAL OVERSIGHT SERVICE (IOS): ANNUAL REPORT 2013 SUMMARY The annual
Final version of 23/02/2009 COCOF 09/0002/01-EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE ON THE CONCEPT OF RELIANCE ON THE WORK OF OTHER AUDITORS DISCLAIMER This is a Working
The Hague, 8 April 2011 File no. 2566-566 Europol Activities in Relation to the TFTP Agreement Information Note to the European Parliament 1 August 2010 1 April 2011 Table of contents 1. Introduction...
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION AUDIT REPORT Audit of OCHA s management of the Haiti Emergency Relief and Response Fund Overall results relating to the management of the Haiti Emergency Relief and Response Fund
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2015 DEFENSE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Further DOD and DOE Actions Needed to Provide Timely Conference Decisions and
Roadmap for the Transition from AIS to AIM First Edition 2009 International Civil Aviation Organization Roadmap for the Transition from AIS to AIM First Edition 2009 International Civil Aviation Organization
Vanderbilt University Medical Center Project Implementation Process (PIP).......... Project Implementation Process OVERVIEW...4 PROJECT PLANNING PHASE...5 PHASE PURPOSE... 5 TASK: TRANSITION FROM PEP TO
4 Guide to Developing a Quality Improvement Plan September 2013 Copyright The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE U.S. Census Bureau Census 2010: Delays in Address Canvassing Software Development and Testing, Help Desk Planning, and Field Office Deployment Have Increased Operational Risk
Department of Health and Human Services OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL NOT ALL RECOMMENDED FRAUD SAFEGUARDS HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN HOSPITAL EHR TECHNOLOGY Daniel R. Levinson Inspector General December 2013
Appendix 3 (normative) High level structure, identical core text, common terms and core definitions NOTE In the Identical text proposals, XXX = an MSS discipline specific qualifier (e.g. energy, road traffic
MRC Clinical Trials Series MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 Medical Research Council MRC GUIDELINES FOR GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE IN CLINICAL TRIALS 1998 MRC GUIDELINES FOR
29 November 2012, Madrid Speaking the same language on noise exposure in Europe: the outcome of phase A of CNOSSOS-EU process Stylianos Kephalopoulos 1 and Marco Paviotti 2 1 European Commission, Joint
ISO/IEC DIR 1 ISO/IEC Directives Part 1 Edition 11.0 2014-05 colour inside CONTAINS THE FINAL VERSION AND THE REDLINE VERSION Procedures for the technical work ISO/IEC DIR 1:2014(EN) THIS PUBLICATION IS
CITY OF SALEM DATA CENTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST SERIES 0854 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST 1 0858 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST 5 0855 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST 2 0859 INFORMATION SYSTEMS