1 2013 Independent Insurance Agents of Houston: Energy Symposium Houston, Texas August 8, 2013 Mary Shaddock Jones Master Service Agreements in the Oil and Gas Industry
2 Agenda Overview of Master Service Agreements in the Oil and Gas Industry Principles of Contractual Indemnity Overview of Anti Indemnity Statute in Texas relating to oil, gas, or water wells, or mines for other minerals. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code et seq. (2012) Exceptions to the Anti Indemnity Ban Impact of Anti Indemnity Statutes in Master Service Agreements in the Oil and Gas Industry Impact of Anti Indemnity it Statutes t t in Master Service Agreements in the Oil and Gas Industry Overview of Anti Indemnity Clauses and Insurance involved in Fracking for Oil and Gas in Texas
3 Master Service Agreements in the Oil and Gas Industry In the Oil and Gas industry, Master Service Agreements (MSAs), establish a contractual relationship to govern ongoing work during exploration, drilling, production and service without having to renegotiate terms and conditions multiple times. The Oil and Gas industry created the MSA to respond to two crucial needs: the necessity to respond quickly to operational changes and the implementation ti of acarefully planned risk ik allocation strategy that is suitable for multiemployer work sites. MSA s allow parties to quickly execute simple Work Orders incorporating, by reference, more extensive provisions contained within previously negotiated and executed agreements.
4 Poorly Drafted MSAs MSA s While the MSA concept provides many contractual advantages, MSA s are often inadequately prepared, used in applications for which they were not designed or kept in service beyond their useful life. Failure to take into account relevant legal requirements and operational necessities can result in a contract that fails to guide the parties through foreseeable circumstances. Similarly, the MSA that fails to address certain geographic locations and jurisdictional differences, can also create an contract which does not meet the mutual intentions of the parties; which usually leads to litigation.
5 Risk Allocation
6 Flowing Down Responsibility A Master Service Agreement allows a company to negotiate acceptable terms and conditions in advance without having to negotiate while work is waiting to be performed. It also allows a consistent approach to risk allocation that allows a company s various MSA s to fit together with other contracts that the company will enter into in the performance of the work. For instance, if a Contractor is required to assume responsibility in the prime contract which is beyond the risk appetite of its company, the Contractor has to transfer that risk in one or more ways. One risk transfer method is to transfer the risk to a Subcontractor with expertise in the area, backed up by an indemnity and insurance provisions. The key will be obtaining pass through responsibility in the Subcontract MSA.
7 Focus on Indemnity Black s law definition (1) A duty to make good any loss, damage or liability another has incurred. (2) The right of an injured party to claim reimbursement for its loss, damage, or liability from a person who has such a duty. (3) Reimbursement or compensation for loss, damage, or liability. Layman s English definition An undertaking by which the indemnifying party ( indemnitor ) agrees to make good any loss or damage that the indemnified party ( indemnitee ) has incurred, or to safeguard the indemnitee against liability.
8 Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Statute Prior to 1973, oil companies and oil well operators would enter into contracts with smaller contractors, and require the smaller contractors to indemnify them not only from the contractor s negligence, but from their own negligence as well. In addition to being unfair, this was placing an undue financial burden on these smaller contractors. In an effort to combat this practice, the Texas legislature passed the Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Statute TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE (the Statute ) ) of the Statute provides that any agreement pertaining to wells for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral which purports to indemnify if a person or entity against liability that t (i) is caused by their sole or concurrent negligence and (ii) arises from personal injury or death; property injury; or any loss, damage or expense that arises from personal injury, death or property p injury is void and unenforceable.
9 Agreement Pertaining to a Well of the Statute defines an agreement pertaining to a well for oil, gas, or water or to a mine for a mineral" as: (1) a written or oral agreement or understanding concerning the rendering of well or mine services or (2) an agreement to perform a part of those services or an act collateral to those services, including furnishing or renting equipment, incidental transportation, or other goods and services furnished in connection with the services, but does not included a joint operating agreement.
10 What is a Well or Mine Service? of the Statute provides that well or mine service : includes: (i) drilling, deepening, reworking, repairing, improving, testing, treating, perforating, acidizing, logging, conditioning, purchasing, gathering, storing, or transporting oil, brine water, fresh water, produced water, condensate, petroleum products, or other liquid commodities, or otherwise rendering services in connection with a well drilled to produce or dispose of oil, gas, other minerals or water; and (ii) designing, i excavating, constructing, ti improving, i or otherwise rendering services in connection with a mine shaft, drift, or other structure intended for use in exploring for or producing a mineral; but does not include: (i) purchasing, selling, gathering, storing, or transporting gas or natural gas liquids by pipeline or fixed associated facilities; or (ii) construction, maintenance, or repair of oil, natural gas liquids, or gas pipelines or fixed associated facilities.
11 Statutory Exceptions of the Statute provides that additional types of indemnity agreements will not be rendered void and unenforceable when: The parties agree in writing that the indemnity obligation will be supported by liability insurance coverage to be furnished by the indemnitor subject to the limitations specified below. With respect to a mutual indemnity obligation, the indemnity obligation is limited to the extent of the coverage and dollar limits of insurance or qualified self insurance each party as indemnitor has agreed to provide in equal amounts to the other party as indemnitee. it With respect to a unilateral indemnity obligation, the amount of insurance required may not exceed $500,
12 Additional Statutory Exceptions of the Statute provides that the following will not be rendered void and unenforceable: insurance contracts and a benefit conferred under the Texas Workers' Compensation statutes of the Statute allows the surface estate owner the right to secure indemnity from a lessee, an operator, a contractor or other persons conducting mineral exploration or production operations on the owner's land.
13 Drafting Enforceable Indemnity Clauses Drafting enforceable indemnity clauses under the Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Statute can be difficult. Although the Statute is broadly worded, a number of courts have interpreted its language g strictly. A thorough understanding of the Statute and the location and type of work are critical in order to ensure that the agreements are technically sound and comply with each section of the Statute. I started out this presentation talking about Indemnity clauses in a Master Service Agreement. However, the first case I want to discuss involves an indemnity clause not in an MSA, but in a work ticket t with standard dterms and conditions.
14 Recent Cases What can go wrong! Expro Ams., LLC v. Sanguine Gas Exploration, LLC, 351 S.W.3d 915 (14 th District Court of Appeals Houston)(October 27, 2011) Sanguine is an Oklahoma based entity which operated an oil andgas lease in Wheeler County, Texas. Sanguine hired Anadarko Consultants, Inc. ("Anadarko") "to design, manage, and directly supervise" a drilling project on the lease. Roy Judd, an employee of Anadarko, worked as "company man" at the well site. In this capacity, Judd frequently requested services and equipment from contractors and signed hundreds of job tickets pertaining to these services. Judd contacted Expro to request "choke flow services. Expro employee Brandon Sh Schreck provided d the requested services and then presented Judd with a job ticket to sign. The reverse side of the ticket was entitled "Rental and Service Agreement Terms and Conditions" and contained eight separate provisions. Provision seven was entitled "RELEASE & INDEMNITY."
15 Recent Cases (continued) According to terms and conditions in the work ticket, the parties agreed to indemnify each other and procure insurance covering their respective indemnity obligations. Schreck did not explain any of the language g or refer Judd to the reverse side of the ticket. Further, Judd signed the ticket without reading the provisions. Sanguine received a copy of the ticket and paid for the services rendered by Expro without objection. Subsequently, Expro was named as a defendant in a lawsuit arising from a fatal accident that occurred at the well site. Expro demanded Sanguine provide defense and indemnity in connection with the underlying suit.
16 Who Are The Players? Operator Contractor Sub Contractor Sanguine Operated doil and Gas Lease Anadarko Hired to Supervise the Drilling Expro America s Hired to perform subcontract Deceased Family of the Deceased
17 Expect to Occur Deceased Family Insurance Sanguine MSA Expro Anadarko MSA
18 Actually Occurred Deceased Family Sanguine (Owner) Work Ticket Expro (Subcontractor of Subcontractor)
19 What are the Issues? Was there a Contract between Expro (Subcontractor) and Sanguine (Operator)? Remember An Employee of Anadarko contacted Expro to request "choke flow services. Sanguine didn t have anything to do with requesting the service from Expro. What did the Rental and Service Agreement Terms and Conditions say? Sanguine is listed as "CUSTOMER" on the Expro job ticket, and Judd (Anadarko Employee) signed the ticket as "CUSTOMER REP." EQUIPMENT LISTED HEREIN RECEIVED; I HAVE READ AND EQUIPMENT LISTED HEREIN RECEIVED; I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND REPRESENT THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS AGREEMENT AS A CUSTOMER'S AGENT
20 Issues relating to Anti Indemnity 1. Is the "Rental and Service Agreement Terms and Conditions an Agreement relating to Wells thus covered by the Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Statute? 2. Did it require one party to indemnify it for its own negligence? 3. Did it comply with the Express Negligence requirement ( a party seeking indemnity from the consequences of that party's own negligence must express that intent in specific terms within the four corners of the contract). 4. Did it comply with the Conspicuousness requirement (something must appear on the face of the [contract] to attract the attention of a reasonable person when he looks at it). 5. Is thereastatutoryexceptionapplicableto theagreement?
22 What did the Court Find? This court has recognized that indemnity provisions included among unrelated terms and conditions on the reverse side of a document generally do not satisfy the conspicuousness requirement when the provision is not set apart by contrasting font or typeface. EQUIPMENT LISTED HEREIN RECEIVED; I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND REPRESENT THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THIS AGREEMENT AS A CUSTOMER'S AGENT Only eight provisions appear on the reserve side of the ticket. Directly above the first provision, is the following bolded, italicized, and underlined language: BOTH PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, BELOW, ARECONSPICUOUS AND AFFORD FAIR AND ADEQUATENOTICE. Provision seven is entitled RELEASE & INDEMNITY, pertains solely to indemnification, and contains a lengthy bolded, italicized, and underlined definition for the phrase Regardless of Cause. Additionally, notwithstanding use of small font and thin, colored paper, the provision is not unreadable. In fact, the capitalized and bolded heading RELEASE & INDEMNITY is prominent because of the small font. Construing the job ticket as a whole, we conclude as a matter of law that the indemnity provision would attract the attention of a reasonable person.
23 What about the Insurance Policy? In Armijo v. Tetra Techs, Inc. a March 27, 2013 case recently decided in the Eastern District of Louisiana the insurance company stated that even if the indemnity agreement was upheld, there was no coverage due to the following exclusions in a Marine GeneralLiability Policy: Exclusion (d) coverage does not apply to obligations under worker s compensation laws, the LHWCA, the Jones Act, General Maritime Law, FELA, or any similar law; Exclusion (e) providing that coverage does not apply to injuries to employees of the insured; Exclusion (g) providing that coverage does not apply to injuries arising out of the use of a watercraft owned, leased or chartered to an insured; and, Endorsement No 2, which excludes coverage for damages with respect to crew members of the insured vessel.
24 Plaintiff seeking damages for personal injury sustained offshore while assisting in a crane operation to remove a dismantled bridge that had connected two sections of an oil production platform in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana. Plaintiff an Employee of Vertex who is the NAMED INSURED on the General Liability Policy Owner of the Platform Contractor/ vessel owner Employer Welding Company General Liability Insurance Policy of Employer.
25 Exclusion (d): (d) The insurance does not apply to any obligation of the insured under a workers compensation, United States Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation, Jones Act, Death on the High SeasAct, General Maritime Law, Federal Employers Liability Act, disability benefits or unemployment compensation or any other similar law. Court found that the exclusion applied to Workers Compensation type liability not general liability claims under general maritime law.
26 Exclusion (e) The is policy does not apply to: Bodily Injury to : (1) An employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of: (a) () Employment by the Insured; or, (b) Performing duties related to the conduct of the insured s business This exclusion applies (1) whether the insured may be liable as an employer or in any other capacity This exclusion does not apply to liability assumed by the insured under an insured contract. The Court found that the plaintiff was NOT an employee of the Insured. (in this case the insured was the additional assured. The plaintiff was anemployee ofthe Named Assured.
27 Exclusion (g) This policy does not apply to: Bodily Injury or Property Damage arising out of: (1) the ownership, maintenance, use or entrustment to others of any watercraft owned, leased, rented or chartered to any insured. Use includes loading and unloading. This exclusion does not apply to (b) liability assumed under any insured contract for the ownership, maintenance or use of watercraft. The Court noted that although one of the entities seeking additional assured status owned the vessel on which the injury occurred, the injury was caused by two sources: (1) negligence and (2) the unseaworthiness of the barge. The exclusion did not apply to the extent the personal injury arose out of negligence, as opposed to the unseaworthiness of the vessel.
28 Endorsement No 2 Endorsement No. 2. stated: In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that this policy excludes any loss, damage, claims or expenses with respects to employees of the Assured and/or members of the crew of the Vessel Insured hereunder. The insurance company claimed that the plaintiff was working on the barge; and was therefore, a member of the crew which triggered the exclusion. h f d h h l ff ld h The Court found that the plaintiff was a welder, who was just asked to work from the barge while performing his welding duties on the job. He was not a member of the crew.
29 Wrap Up: Armijo vs. Tetra Tech (1) Because the job was to remove a walkway on a decommissioned oil and gas platform the Court said that the Oilfield Anti IndemnityStatute didnotapply. (2) The Court found that the Indemnity Clause in the MSAwas valid. (3) The Court found that the indemnitees (platform owner and barge owner) were provided coverage for bodily injury to theemployeeofthenamedinsuredtotheextentthatthe personal injury arose out of the negligence of the indemnitees, and not from the unseaworthiness of the vessel.
30 Recent Case Delahoussaye v. Pisces Energy, LLC United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Decided March 30, 2012 Pisces Energy LLC is the owner of the platform at issue in this case, Mustang Island 739 A (hereinafter MI 739 A ). The MI 739 A is a fixed platform, permanently embedded in the subsoil and seabed in the Gulf of Mexico and adjacent to the coast of Texas on the Outer Continental Shelf. Crescent Drilling and Production, Inc. was hired to furnish a Consultant to manage the workover. In place at this time was a Master Service Agreement between Crescent and Pisces. Pisces had a contract with Warrior Energy Services, whereby Warrior agreed to provide a crew to perform work on the MI 739 A under a MSA Pisces also contracted with Performance Energy Services, LLC for the services of a crane operator to perform work on the MI 739 A under a MSA
31 Who Are The Players? Operator Contractor Sub Contractor Pisces Owner of Platform Crescent Drilling Hiredto Supervise the workover Warrior Energy Services and Performance Hired to perform subcontracts Injured Employee Delahoussaye Employee of Warrior
32 Expect to Occur Injured Employee Of Warrior Insurance Pisces MSA Warrior Crescent MSA
33 Issues relating to Anti Indemnity 1. Does Maritime Law or Texas Law Apply? 2. If Texas law, is the Master Service Agreement an Agreement relating to Wells thus covered by the Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Statute? 3. Did it require one party to indemnify it for its own negligence? 4. Did it comply with the Express Negligence requirement ( a party seeking indemnity from the consequences of that party's own negligence must express that intent in specific terms within the four corners of the contract). 5. Did it comply pywith the Conspicuousness requirement (something must appear on the face of the [contract] to attract the attention of a reasonable person when he looks at it). 6. Is there a statutory exception applicable to the Agreement?
34 Texas Law vs. Maritime Law? The rules are different when determining the law to apply to the claims of the injured party (TORT CLAIM) vs. the law to apply to the validity of an indemnity claim (CONTRACT). To determine the law to apply for the Indemnity Claim where the accident occurred offshore on the Outer Continental Shelf: 1. Are the MSA s Maritime Contracts? 2. If non maritime, then does OCSLA apply? l? 3. If OCSLA applies, then what state law applies? 4. Does the State law conflict with OCSLA or Federal Law? 5. Does a Choice of Law provision override all of the above? The reason that this analysis is crucial to this case, is that federal maritimelaw would uphold the indemnity clause, but OCSLA, federal law, and Texas law may not.
35 Findings By the Court: It is undisputed that the MI 739 A isafixedplatformlocated in the Mustang Island Block 739, in the Gulf of Mexico and adjacent to the coast of Texas on the Outer Continental Shelf, approximately seventy five (75) miles from the coast. Maritime vs. non maritime? Does the Outer Continental Shell Lands Act Apply? The OCSLA generally incorporates the law of the adjacent state as surrogate fd federal llaw. Situs of the WORK covered by OCSLA? Yes, Fixed Platform on OCSLA Federal maritime law must not apply on its own Statelawmustnotbeinconsistent with federal law. The court ultimately determined that because the work was not dependent upon a vessel, that the OCSLA and thus Texas StateLaw applied.
36 Findings By the Court (continued) The Court then turned its attention to discussing the Texas Oilfield Anti Indemnity Act: As a general rule, the TOAIA voids indemnity provisions in agreements pertaining to a well for oil, gas,orwaterortoa mine for a mineral if those agreements seek to indemnify a person for his own negligence. A contract pertains to a well if it requires the rendering of well or mine services. Id. Mores specifically, this includes: the reworking, repairing, improving... or otherwise rendering [of] services in connection with a well drilled to produce or dispose of oil, gas, other minerals or water.
37 Findings By the Court (continued) The Safe Harbor Provision provides that indemnity language in a contract that falls under the TOAIA is not void if the indemnity obligations are reciprocal and if the parties agree in writing that the indemnity obligation will be supported by liability insurance coverage to be furnished by the indemnitor. The Master Service Agreements in place do not contain reciprocal indemnity provisions and they require both Crescent and Performance to procure and maintain insurance to cover its indemnity obligations under the contract. In conclusion, since the insurance requirements of the Safe Harbor Provision are not met, the MSA between Crescent and Pisces and the MSA between Performance and Pisces violates the provisions of the TOAIA.
38 Was the Court Correct? Statutory Exceptions of the Statute provides that additional types of indemnity agreements will not be rendered void and unenforceable when: The parties agree in writing that the indemnity obligation will be supported by liability insurance coverage to be furnished by the indemnitor subject to the limitations specified below. With respect to a mutual indemnity obligation, the indemnity obligation is limited to the extent of the coverage and dollar limits of insurance or qualified self insurance each party as indemnitor has agreed to provide in equal amounts to the other party as indemnitee. it With respect to a unilateral indemnity obligation, the amount of insurance required may not exceed $500,
39 Yes The Court was Correct According to the Court, both the Pisces Crescent and the Pisces Performance MasterServiceAgreements providethe following indemnity language: [Pisces] shall defend, protect, indemnify, and hold harmless Contractor, its employees, subsidiaries, affiliated companies, joint venturers, partners, contractors, agents, invitees, i and all of their respective officers, directors, and employees (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the Contractor Group ) from and against all suits, actions, claims, liabilities, damages, and demands based upon personal injury, death, or property p damage or loss, whenever occurring, suffered by any of the Palm Group, where the claim or loss arises out of, is connected with, incident to, or is directly or indirectly resulting from or relating to the performance of this Agreement or out of any related or unrelated activities in the vicinity thereof, whether the claim is groundless or not, and whether the loss or injury is caused in whole or in part by the negligence or fault of any of the Contractor Group or the condition of any vehicle, vessel, aircraft, or equipment or by defect in any equipment or property of the Contractor Group.
40 Insurance For Pisces Not Required According to the Court, the Master Service Agreements in place do not contain reciprocal indemnity provisions and they require both Crescent and Performance to procure and maintain insurance to cover its indemnity obligations under the contract. The Court does not find the obligations contained in either MSA to be mutual indemnity obligations. Additionally, the Safe Harbor Provision is not met because the MSA contains no requirement for mutual insurance. In fact, this Court notes, there are no insurance requirements of Pisces. The Plaintiff was part of the Pisces Group; therefore, Pisces was required to indemnify if Crescent and Performance for injury or death to the Plaintiff even if Crescent or Performance was negligent. The Court discussed that there was no mutual indemnity, but the TOAIA allows for unilateral indemnity provided insurance is provided by the person owing the indemnity but it is limited to $500,000. The MSA apparently did not require Pisces to have insurance; therefore, the Court was right in its findings; but I believe wrong in the explanation because a unilateral indemnity is allowed provided insurance is required, but the liability is capped at $500,000.
41 Fracking. To discuss if there is sufficient time! If not We will address in the next session.
42 Questions or Comments? Mary Shaddock Jones, LLC Attorney At Law 1508 Hodges St. Lake Charles, LA (Office) (Cell) (Direct Office)
Contractual Risk Allocation in a Post- Macondo Environment Michael A. Golemi William W. Pugh Willis 2012 North America Energy Conference May 16, 2012 A Professional Law Corporation New Orleans Lafayette
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila email@example.com Kevin Hess firstname.lastname@example.org 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 94-41244. Jerry B. HODGEN; Bobby Sue Hodgen, Plaintiffs, v. FOREST OIL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, FOREST OIL CORPORATION; Ronald J. Doucet, Defendants-Third
Marine Insurance Day October 5, 2012 Additional Insureds & Marine Insurance Joe Grasso and Michael Thompson 1 Agenda General Principles Case Studies Takeaways and Q&A 2 Named Insureds v. Additional Insureds
California Senate Bill 474 Impact on Owners & Contractors Beginning January 1, 2013, project owners, general contractors ( GC ), construction managers ( CM ) and any lower tier contractor who employs subcontractors
SHORT FORM STANDARD SUBCONTRACT This Agreement is made this day of, 20, between (Contractor) and (Subcontractor). The work described in Section I below shall be performed in accordance with the prime contract
Indemnity and Risk Allocation: You Can t Always Get What You Want, But it s Good to Know How to Get What You Need William W. Pugh A Professional Law Corporation New Orleans Lafayette Houston 1 Overview
SYLLABUS FOR MARITIME PERSONAL INJURY AND DEATH Spring 2016 PROFFESSOR JOHN F. UNGER 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES The objectives of this course are to teach the substantive law of the subject matter integrated
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT Rice Global E & C Roundtable Houston, Texas By Kerry C. Williams 2005 PROGRAM 1. Bases of Risk 2. Risk Management 3. Special Issues BASES OF RISK LEGAL BASES
-1- -2- -3- -4- -5- INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENTS 1.1 The developer shall obtain and keep in force during the term of the contract, Commercial General Liability insurance policies
Indemnity and Insurance Issues in Commercial Leases and Related Agreements Gary Rachlin William W. Pugh ACC Houston Chapter Meeting May 8, 2012 A Professional Law Corporation New Orleans Lafayette Houston
CALIFORNIA Strict Indemnity Language Contractor (Indemnitor) shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Authority, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all liability,
California Civil Code 2782.05 (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), provisions, clauses, covenants, and agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract and amendments
ATTACHMENT A.6 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ROUTINE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR PROJECTS Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts listed below. A. COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND UMBRELLA
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee
ACC Houston Chapter Meeting Indemnities and Insurance: Managing Risks Via Contracts in the Post-Macondo World April 9, 2013 Panelists Lisa Brown Managing Counsel, Oxy Permian Former outside counsel. Received
STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter
EXHIBIT A (of Request for Proposal) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES This Independent Contractor Agreement for Services ( Agreement ) is made as of, 2016 between the Dublin Unified
Case 3:13-cv-00054 Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 This case is being reviewed for possible publication by American Maritime Cases, Inc. ( AMC ). If this case is published in AMC s book
Administration COUNTY OF PLACER Community Development Resource Agency BUILDING THIRD PARTY CONSULTANT PLAN REVIEW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of, 20, by and between the COUNTY OF PLACER, hereinafter
BENTON COUNTY PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT This is an agreement by and between BENTON COUNTY, OREGON, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, hereinafter called COUNTY, and, hereinafter called CONTRACTOR.
Indemnity Issues in Product Liability Claims arising from Construction Defect Litigation Recent Cases In a recent decision, the Texas Supreme Court held that a subcontractor is a "seller," under Tex. Civ.
Indemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq. Issue: Indemnification provisions in contracts may require the design professional
ABA ICLC 2014 Conference Indemnity, AI, and the BP Oil Spill Tracy Alan Saxe Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Hamden, CT Celia B. Keniry Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Hamden, CT A common misconception regarding
Best Practices to Minimize Action Over Claims David Matthiessen Vice President, Claims Everest National Insurance Company The information presented in this material has been developed from sources believed
AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING CONSULTATION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made as of December 1, 2003, by and between the San Francisquito Creek Joint Powers Authority, a body corporate and politic
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
North Central Texas College Board of Regents Meeting October 20, 2014 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of Approving Fees for Owner s Representative At the December, 2013, meeting of the Board of Regents, the
AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY AND CONTRACTOR FOR GOODS AND SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, effective this 20th day of April in the year, 2015, between: MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, a political subdivision
Liability Insurance Table Of Contents Section Page No. Coverages Coverage 1 Premises/Operations (1A) 4 Incidental Watercraft (1B) 4 Specific Property Of Others-Care, Control Or Custody (1C) 4 Damage To
DATE: Company: ATT: Fax No. : Phone No. : STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR FIELD SERVICE Dear Customer: ITEC is in receipt of your request for on-site service(s) (hereinafter Services ) by an ITEC Field
Risk Transfer: A Strategy to Help Protect Your Business Risk Control Businesses rely on crucial relationships with contractors, subcontractors, vendors and consumers. In these relationships, agreements
ADDENDUM A1 Subcontractor Insurance Requirements Certificates and endorsements must be received and approved prior to the start of any work. No payments will be released until all insurance documents are
In Defense of Insured Contracts July 2007 The term "insured contract" certainly sounds reassuring. As the definition of "insured contract" lists not only certain contracts or agreements (contract for the
MASTER AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of, 2007, by and between the University of Washington ( Owner ) and, ( Project
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0670 444444444444 IN RE DEEPWATER HORIZON, RELATOR 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON CERTIFIED QUESTIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT Please print and fax to: 281-842-9345 Stutes Enterprise Systems, Inc. ("Lessor"), located at 1426 Sens Rd #5, LaPorte, Texas 77571, leases to, ("Lessee"), located
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
Exhibit D CRANE AUCTION INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The insurance requirements below are dependent on the actions to be taken by the successful vendor(s) following the Port of Los Angeles
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT
WC 00 00 00 A (Ed. 4-92) WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY PLEASE READ THE POLICY CAREFULLY. QUICK REFERENCE BEGINNING ON PAGE INFORMATION PAGE GENERAL SECTION... 2 A. The Policy...
Know Your Indemnity Obligation Know Your Risk Know Your Insurance Company by KEVIN R. CARLIN, ESQ. Roadmap Key Points to Take From This Presentation: Type I, Type II &Type III indemnity How to identify
ARIEL AIRPORT OWNERS AND OPERATORS LIABILITY INSURANCE The Insurers hereby agree to the extent and in the manner hereinafter provided, to pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become
NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this Policy, we agree with you as follows. GENERAL
Survey Says: The Feud Over Insurance and Indemnity Provisions in Business Contracts Indemnity and Insurance Provisions in Commercial Contracts Kenneth M. Gorenberg Stefan R. Dandelles Indemnity and insurance
HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNITY, SUBROGATION AND ADDITIONAL INSURED INSURANCE IN TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS By James W. Bryan Nexsen Pruet P.L.L.C. Greensboro, North Carolina 336-373-1600 email@example.com
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF YREKA AND [CONTRACTOR] THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of, 2014, by and between the City of Yreka, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (ICA) (This agreement is not a construction contract within the meaning of Civil Code section 2783, and is not an agreement for the provision of construction services within
Independent Contractor Agreement (Long Form) This Agreement is made between Babson College ("College"), a Massachusetts non-profit corporation with a principal place of business at 231 Forest Street, Babson
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTOR LIABILITY INSURANCE The following are excerpts from Caltrans 2010Standard Specifications. Specifications are subject to change so refer to the project
Certificate of Liability Insurance, Form ACORD25: Following are the insurance requirements of the State of Minnesota acting through its Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities,
RISC Rice Insurance Services Company, LLC We put the Experience and Options in E&O programs 4211 Norbourne Blvd., Louisville, KY 40207 Phone: (502) 897-1876/Toll-free: (800) 637-7319 Fax: (502) 897-7174
Indemnities and Endorsements Protecting the Owner and Developer Click to edit Master title style Update on Indemnification, Anti-Indemnity Statutes and Additional Insured Endorsements CoreNet Global Network
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this policy, we agree with you as follows: General Section A. The Policy
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of this day of, 2010, by and between the CITY OF MONTROSE, State of Colorado, a Colorado home rule municipal corporation, whose
AIA Document A312 - Electronic Format Performance Bond THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES: CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WITH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION. AUTHENTICATION
CONSULTANT CONTRACT Resolution No. - STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, of Dallas County, Texas, (hereinafter
The Duty to Defend Your Client Implications of Two Recent California Court Decisions and the Impact of SB 972 April 2011 By Jeffrey W. Cavignac, CPCU, ARM, RPLU, CRIS President/Principal, Cavignac & Associates
Independent Contractor Agreement This Independent Contractor Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered by and between Vehicle Inspection Pro s, LLC. ( VIP or Company"), a Missouri Limited Liability Company
INDUSTRIAL CARPET CLEANING SERVICES CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT executed on this the day of, 20 by and between (hereinafter "Employer"), and (hereinafter "Contractor") NOW, THEREFORE, FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT and CITY OF RIVERSIDE THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU ) is made and entered into this day of, 2012 ( Effective Date ), by
EXHIBIT 1 Standard Contract Addendum This Standard Contract Addendum ( Addendum ) is between Texas Southern University ( University ) and the other party ( Contracting Party ) indicated in the signature
Heather McCloskey Deputy City Attorney Port of Los Angeles Description of the premises in the lease Permitted Uses Maintenance and Repair Restoration Indemnification and Insurance Port Tariff applicable
STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into in the City of Modesto, State of California, this day of, 20, ( Effective Date ) by and between the CITY OF MODESTO, a municipal
WORKERS CO MPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY ABCDEFGHIJ In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this policy, we agree with you as follows: GENERAL SECTION
INTERLOCAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLE AND CAPE EDUCATIONAL COMPACT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF N.J.S.A. 40:8A-1 ET SEQ. INTERLOCAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLE
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT (On Call Real Estate Broker Services) THIS AGREEMENT (Contract") is made this 14th day of December, 2010, between the Board of County Commissioners of Sumter County, Florida
PRODUCT SALES AGREEMENT This Product Sales Agreement (this Agreement ) is made as of the day of, 201, by and between Georgia Tech Applied Research Corporation, a Georgia non-profit corporation ( Seller
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL OFFICE OF THE NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL GRANTEE- FORECLOSURE RELIEF PROGRAM MAY 20, 2011 SCOPE OF WORK: The Office of the Attorney General (AGO) recently received a settlement from Wells
THE STATE OF TEXAS Neighborhood Matching Grant COUNTY OF TARRANT Program Agreement THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT (hereafter Agreement ) is made and entered into on this day of, 2016,
2014 Texas Indemnity Law Update Presented by James W. Bartlett, Jr. Purpose of an Indemnity Provision Promise to safeguard or hold a party harmless against existing and/or future loss liability In some
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made the day December, 2015, between the County of Currituck (hereinafter County ) and, (hereinafter Contractor ). RECITALS County is a body corporate
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA WAKE COUNTY Rev. 3/14 NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY MASSAGE THERAPIST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made by and between ( Contractor ), and North Carolina State University,
14 TH ANNUAL RISK MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THE LIFE OF AN ACCIDENT AND HOW TO HANDLE IT: CASE STUDY Mark Meyer Cal Burnton 1 POTENTIAL PARTIES (DEEP POCKETS) - Eastpointe Airport - owned airport - erected
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION AND FOR AGREEMENT made this day of, 201_, pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware River Basin Compact, by and between the DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
Page 1 of 9 DOCUMENT 00850 INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT B-1 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS ABOVE $25,000 Indemnity The Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold
Terms and Conditions for Purchase Orders for Recycling Materials This Agreement is made by and between AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corporation with a place of business at Rancho Cordova, California
Business Finance Agent Agreement This Agreement is between The Business Finance Store ("Company") a division of FinanceMark Inc. a Nevada Corporation and you, referred to as Agent from this point forth.
Columbia University Agreement Agreement ( Agreement ) dated as of, 20 (the Effective Date ) between The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York ( Columbia ) and ( Service Provider ). 1.