CIVIL ACTION NO. 414 OF 2001 NASRA KHAN VS- FIJI DEVELOPMENT BANK IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION. Civil Action No.
|
|
- Ophelia York
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION Civil Action No. 414 of 2001 BETWEEN: NASRA KHAN Plaintiff AND: FIJI DEVELOPMENT BANK Defendant Appearances: Mr Suresh Chandra for the plaintiff Mr P. Sharma for the defendant Date of hearing: 26th January, 2012 JUDGMENT 1. The plaintiff her husband had obtained a housing loan from the defendant Bank(Bank) in 1997, in respect of a property at 23,Volavola Road, Tamavua, Suva. They were the joint registered proprietors of that property. In order to secure the loan under a mortgage debt, the property was insured with the Bank under a Mortgage Protection Insurance (MPI) scheme.the MPI policy was issued by Colonial Health Care Fiji Limited, for the insured sum of $71,000. The policy owner was the Bank. Under the MPI scheme, upon the death or permanent disability of any one of the mortgagors, the total loan amount outstanding was to be fully paid by the insurers and the mortgage over the property would be discharged.the premium was paid directly by the Bank in terms of a standing order, and was debited to the accounts of the plaintiff and her husband. The statement of claim proceeds to state that the plaintiff and her husband informed the Bank that they intended to withdraw from the MPI scheme,in future. The Bank was however, not willing to do so, without adequate alternative protection. Meanwhile, on 3rd September, 2000, the plaintiff's husband died. The plaintiff discovered that the Bank had failed to pay the premium, in time. The plaintiff alleges that she suffered loss and damages, as a result of the Bank's negligence in failing to keep the MPI scheme current, at the time of the death of her husband. The primary facts are undisputed. In its statement of defence, the Bank states it had advised its brokers to cancel the insurance,pursuant to the plaintiff and her husband's written notice to the Bank that they desire to withdraw from the MPI scheme. The defendant denies that it was negligent in failing to keep the insurance policy current and states " the premium, for the year 2000 was paid by the Defendant, but the policy was cancelled on the instructions of the Plaintiff and the deceased". 1
2 In her reply to the defence, the plaintiff reiterates that she expected that their joint request to cancel the MPI policy to take effect, in future. The Bank had not accepted her offer to cancel the policy and had requested her to provide further particulars, in order to cancel the insurance. This, she had not complied with. 2. The hearing The plaintiff, in her testimony, stated that she had met Roshni Singh, Loan Officer, of the Bank on 15 August,2000, and expressed her desire to withdraw from the MPI scheme. Roshni Singh had advised her to register her withdrawal in writing and informed her that the Bank will consider her request, after they bring additional security.this is reiterated in the Bank's response of 28 August, 2000,which the plaintiff stated she received, after her husband had died. Mr Tubuna, Insurance Officer of the Bank testified. He stated that the Bank had many clients who had entered into mortgage protection schemes. The Bank had an agreement with the insurance broker to pay the premiums of their clients in "batches", subsequent to the expiry date of the annual insurance policy. The MPI policy of the plaintiff and her husband were cancelled on 24 August,2000, pursuant to the written request of the plaintiff and her husband and the decision made by Roshni Singh and their Manager Industrial, Ms Leqa. Mr Tubuna also referred to a document sent by Mohinish Singh of the Bank to the insurance brokers, Marsh Limited to delete the plaintiff and husband from the listing. By letter dated 21 September,2000, Marsh Limited had acknowledged the Bank's written request and confirmed that the policy was cancelled with effect from 30 June, The premiums for several of the Bank's clients, excluding the plaintiff and her husband for the period 30 June,2000, to 30 June, 2001, were sent to the insurance brokers, Marsh &Mclennan Limited on 19th October, The determination The disputed facts, as recorded at the pre-trial conference, are as follows: Whether the Defendant kept up with the MPI premium payments to the Plaintiff's insurer, up until the deceased's death? Whether the Plaintiff and the deceased, instructed the Defendant to cancel the MPI, prior to the deceased's death? Whether the Defendant is responsible for the loss and damage suffered by the Plaintiff? The starting point of this dispute is the written request made by the plaintiff and her husband by their letter dated 16th August,2000, to the Bank to withdraw from the MPI scheme, which reads as follows: " I refer to my conversation(singh/khan) of 15/8/00 with regards... I wish to advise you that we the joint owners of the above property would like to withdraw from the mortgagee protection insurance scheme.insurance payments 2
3 have been deducted from the mortgage repayments to the Bank. This has added to the mortgage and we have had to pay additional interest to the Bank. With the paycuts for the Civil Servants and downturn in business, we feel that the Mortgage Protection Insurance is an additional burden... I would like to add that in the event of the demise of one of the property owners, we have other securities such as FNPF and other insurance policies that would cover the cost of the mortgage. I request that this matter be treated urgently." (emphasis added) The Bank responded by their letter dated 28 August, 2000, in these terms: "Your letter dated 16 August, 2000 and our telephone conversation (Nazra/Roshni) of 28/8/2000 refers. We advise that the Bank is considering your request for excluding Mortgage Protection Insurance and request if you could provide the Bank with your Life Insurance Policy ( for a sum of at least $ 62,000) in lieu of Mortgage Protection Insurance. We look forward to your co-operation. KIJI LEQA(MRS) MANAGER INDUSTRIAL" (emphasis added) In my judgment, this document manifests that the Bank was considering the request and had asked for a life insurance policy, in lieu of the MPI. I consider that it is acte clair that there has been no acceptance by the Bank. The Bank's reply constitutes a counter-offer,which was not accepted by the plaintiff. This conclusion suffices to decide this case. However, I proceed to consider the arguments of counsel for the Bank, Mr Sharma. Mr Sharma, in his closing submissions, has contended that the plaintiff's assertion that she intended that the MPI policy be cancelled from 30th June,2001, to 30th June,2002, is inconsistent with the written request of the plaintiff and her husband, which provides that the plaintiff and her husband had financial difficulties. Akin to this, it was submitted that the plaintiff and her husband had also requested that this matter be treated urgently, in order that they could save the premium for the period 30th June,2000, to 30th June,2001.Reliance was placed on the plaintiff's evidence, that Roshni Singh had informed her,that the premium for that period had not been paid. I find these contentions irrelevant. The material circumstance is that the written request of the plaintiff and her husband was not accepted by the Bank. The contention that Roshni Singh had informed that the premium for the period in dispute had not been paid, has been taken out of context. In her immediately preceding answer to that statement,the plaintiff unequivocally stated that she understood that the insurance policy was current for the period 30th June,2000, to 30th June,
4 On the question of urgency, the plaintiff, in cross-examination, stated that she had made request that the matter be treated "urgently", in order that Roshni Singh could process their application prior to her resigning, since she was familiar with the plaintiff's account. Roshni Singh was in fact, no longer employed by the Bank. The letter dated 16th August,2000, does not set out the period from when the plaintiff intended to withdraw from the MPI scheme. In the ordinary course of things, the MPI premium for the period 30th June,2000, to 30th June,2001, should have been paid at the commencement of this period. It transpired in Mr Tubuna's testimony that the premium was admittedly not paid by the Bank, in terms of a private arrangement it had with the insurance brokers. Mr Sharma has also founded an argument on an endorsement on an internal report of forwarded by Roshni Singh to the management. This was produced by Mr Tubuna. Mr Sharma contended that irrespective of whether the plaintiff and her husband provided a life insurance policy to replace the MPI policy, Roshni Singh had recommended the exclusion of the MPI policy, and this was endorsed on 23rd August,2000, by the Manager, Industrial of the Bank. The Bank had then, advised the insurance brokers to cancel the MPI scheme on 24th August,2000.The answer to this submission firstly, is that Roshni Singh's recommendation was made on an internal report to the management dated 17th August,2012. Secondly, it was the following recommendation of Roshni Singh that was endorsed on that report: a) We accede to client's request and exclude MPC from our securities. b) Advise client of (a) above via security variation letter.(emphasis added). The subsequent endorsements on the report under review begged the question whether the MPI can be replaced with a deed of defeasance, and required that the matter be discussed with the client. Mr Tubuna explained that a deed of defeasance was a life insurance policy.roshni Singh, in her reply to this minute, states that she had spoken to the client(the plaintiff) regarding this matter. The client had advised her that she would revert to the Bank, after discussing the matter with her husband. Roshni Singh had concluded her minute to the Manager, Industrial by stating "Follow up with client on 30/08/00"(emphasis added). The final endorsement demonstrates the fallacy of the argument propounded. The theme that runs through the internal report is that the MPI could be excluded,provided alternative security was given. This is consistent with the Manager, Industrial's response to the written request of the plaintiff and her husband. Accordingly, I fail to see how the Bank can possibly advance the contention, that it had acted in accordance with the client's letter dated 16th August,2000, and requested the insurance brokers to cancel the policy of the plaintiff and her husband, as it did, by its letter dated 24th August, The internal report dated 8 November, 2000, made to the management consequent to the plaintiff's letter dated 1 November,2000, seeking redress, is also illuminating. This report comments at the outset with the words in "the absence of Roshni the following could be deduced". It is noted that there was no record of the conversation between the plaintiff and Roshni Singh on 15th August,2000.The report then begs the following question: 4
5 "why would Roshni request Mohinish not to renew when she indicated earlier in the schedule to renew? My view of this is only after Khan's request of 15/8 and follow up letter of 16/8 requesting not to renew..." It would appear that the Bank had no record of Roshin Singh's decision to cancel the insurance policy of the plaintiff and her husband. In order to justify its action, the Bank, had to figure out how Roshni Singh reached this decision This, in my view,is most unsatisfactory. In terms of the MPI scheme, upon the death of the plaintiff's husband, the total loan amount outstanding was admittedly to be fully paid by the insurers. The MPI scheme was negligently cancelled by the Bank. Accordingly, in my judgment, the plaintiff is entitled to claim the loss and damages she suffered, as a result of the Bank's negligence. The plaintiff stated the debt due to the Bank, at the time she and her husband made the joint request to the Bank to withdraw from the MPI scheme, was $62, After the cancellation of the MPI by the Bank, the plaintiff states she had paid a sum of $132,247.47, including interest to the Bank. The Bank did not dispute that the plaintiff paid this sum to discharge the mortgage. There will therefore be judgment for the plaintiff against the Bank for the sum owed under the mortgage debt. 4. Orders The plaintiff is entitled to the following reliefs: a) a declaration that the defendant Bank has been negligent in not keeping the MPI policy current. b) judgment against the defendant Bank for the sum owed under the mortgage debt. c) the defendant Bank is not entitled to interest, since the plaintiff's husband's death on 3rd September,2000, d) a sum of $ 3000 is payable by the defendant Bank to the plaintiff as costs, summarily assessed. 10 August, 2012 A.L.B.Brito- Mutunayagam Judge 5
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE. - and
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF EDMONTON Action No. 0403-12898 B E T W E E N : TANYA LABONTE, JESSE STECHYNSKY AND RHONDA MCPHEE Plaintiffs - and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN
More informationLIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION. Civil Action No. HBC 97 OF 2009 BETWEEN : AND:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION Civil Action No. HBC 97 OF 2009 BETWEEN : MATAIASI DRODROLAGI of Qauia Settlement, Lami, Welder as the husband and administrator in the Estate of LITIANA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION. Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI AT SUVA CIVIL JURISDICTION Civil Action No. HBC 137 of 2008 BETWEEN: ATISH CHAND SHARMA of Lot 11, J.P. Maharaj Road, Nakasi, Nasinu, Unemployed. PLAINTIFF AND: HARDWOOD SALES
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION. IN RE: FRANKIE & BETTY MANCLE Case No.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HELENA DIVISION IN RE: FRANKIE & BETTY MANCLE Case No. 2:03-bk-18756 Debtors. Chapter 13 ORDER Hillsboro Financial Services Associates
More informationCASE 0:11-cv-00841-ADM-AJB Document 84 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:11-cv-00841-ADM-AJB Document 84 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Midas Life Settlements, LLC, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. AND ORDER Civil No. 11-841
More informationTHE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION DAVID P. McLAFFERTY, : September Term, 2000 Plaintiff : : No. 3321 v. : : Commerce Case Program
More informationMotor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Resolution) Act 2007 No 95
New South Wales Motor Accidents Compensation Amendment (Claims and Dispute Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 No 41 2 4 Amendment of other
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION à IN RE: CASE NO. 05-83912. Plaintiff, v. ADVERSARY NO.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION à IN RE: CASE NO. 05-83912 William Ralph LaFevor, Debtor. à CHAPTER 7 JUDGE MASSEY Ann Woolner, Plaintiff, v. ADVERSARY NO.
More informationAUTOMART LIMITED V. WAQA ROKOTUINASAU - ERCA NO. 9 OF 2012 JUDGMENT
IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COURT AT SUVA APPELLATE JURISDICTION CASE NUMBER: ERCA NO. 09 OF 2012 BETWEEN: AUTOMART LIMITED APPELLANT AND: WAQA ROKOTUINASAU RESPONDENT Appearances: Ms. Drova for the Appellant.
More informationSTATE OF VERMONT FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
Drew et. al. v. Drew et. al., No. 174-6-10 Cacv (Teachout, J., Sept. 23, 2013). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the
More informationCHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION
CHAPTER 32-19 FORECLOSURE OF REAL ESTATE MORTGAGES BY ACTION 32-19-01. Action to foreclose mortgage on real estate authorized. The plaintiff shall bring an action in district court for the foreclosure
More informationReal Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan
B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A Real Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan No. RE0398 Issued by Real Estate Errors and Omissions Insurance Corporation (Herein called the Corporation ) Pursuant to the
More informationBetween Sukhvinder Nat, plaintiff, and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Hari Somal, Raghbir Somal and Fruitman Insurance Brokers, defendants
Indexed as: Nat v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co. Between Sukhvinder Nat, plaintiff, and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company, Hari Somal, Raghbir Somal and Fruitman Insurance Brokers, defendants [2001] O.J.
More informationCHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES
CHAPTER 43 ACTIONS OF DAMAGES FOR, OR ARISING FROM, PERSONAL INJURIES Application and interpretation of this Chapter 43.1.-(1) Subject to paragraph (4) and rule 43.1A (actions based on clinical negligence).
More informationFirst Respondent LIBERTYLIFE GROUP LIMITED. Second Respondent METROPOLITAN LIFE LIMITED. Third Respondent MOMENTUM GROUP LIMITED Fourth Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) Case No. 6887/09 In the matter between: HELMAN KAGAN Applicant and RUTH KAGAN First Respondent LIBERTYLIFE GROUP LIMITED Second Respondent
More informationIN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION, PIETERMARITZBURG HOME OBLIGORS MORTGAGE ENHANCED SECURITIES (PTY) LIMITED
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL DIVISION,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit WILLIAM MOSHER; LYNN MOSHER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 19, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk
More informationMortgage LLC d/b/a Champion Mortgage Company (hereinafter Nationstar ) in. the Estate of Mary Jean Oneschuk, Edward J. Oneschuk, Jr., heir, Kenneth J.
KIM E. AYVAZIAN MASTER IN CHANCERY COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHANCERY COURTHOUSE 34 The Circle GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947 AND NEW CASTLE COUNTY COURTHOUSE 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,493 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,493 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee, v. DELWIN CHRISTENSEN, a/k/a DELWIN W. CHRISTENSEN, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationPROBATE IN NEVADA WHAT, WHY, AND HOW by Layne T. Rushforth
WHAT, WHY, AND HOW by Layne T. Rushforth 1. What is Probate?: Probate generally refers to the court proceeding required to formalize the transfer of the assets 1 belonging to a deceased person ( decedent
More informationv. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF v. Plaintiff, Index No. VERIFIED ANSWER TO FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT Defendant(s). Defendant answers as follows: I generally deny each allegation of the Complaint,
More information1.1 Explain the general obligations of a claimant and defendant under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct ( PD-PAC )
Title Preparations for Personal Injury Trials Level 4 Credit value 10 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the procedures which a litigant should follow before court proceedings are issued
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT of FIJI AT LABASA, CIVI JURISDICTION. Civil Action No: 52/09 BETWEEN: PRATAP CHAND of Buca, Savusavu.
IN THE HIGH COURT of FIJI AT LABASA, CIVI JURISDICTION Civil Action No: 52/09 BETWEEN: PRATAP CHAND of Buca, Savusavu. PLAINTIFF AND: MASTER BUILDERS & JOINERY LIMITED a limited liability company having
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: JOSEPH R. O LONE, Case No.: 3:00-bk-5003-JAF Debtor. Chapter 7 / FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This case
More informationSchedule of Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3. Nil
Queen s Bench Forms SCHEDULE OF FORMS 3 Schedule of Forms FORMS FOR PART 1 [Foundational Rules] Form R Nil rule No. Form No. Source FORMS FOR PART 2 [Parties to Litigation] Form R rule No. Form No. Source
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Champion ) Mortgage Company ) Plaintiff ) v. ) ) Naomi J. Carey, Heir and Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Dennis
More information1.1 Explain the general obligations of a claimant and defendant under the Practice Direction on Pre- Action Conduct ( PD-PDC )
Title Preparations for Personal Injury trials Level 4 Credit value 10 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the procedures which a litigant should follow before court proceedings are issued
More informationNo. 1-15-0941 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 150941-U SIXTH DIVISION December 18, 2015 No. 1-15-0941 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationBELIZE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT CHAPTER 258 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003
BELIZE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT CHAPTER 258 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Substantive Laws, prepared by the Law Revision
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DETERMINATION OF DISCHARGEABILITY AND OBJECTING TO DEBTOR'S DISCHARGE PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 523 AND 727 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Chapter 7 DYLAN BROWN, Debtor. Case No. 05-60220 (ALG) HEARST MAGAZINES, A Division Of HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., -against- Plaintiff,
More informationRE: HF No. 173, 2009/10 Gary Timm v. Meade School District 46-1 and Associated School Boards of South Dakota Worker s Compensation Trust Fund
March 29, 2011 James D. Leach Attorney at Law 1617 Sheridan Lake Road Rapid City, SD 57702-3783 Jessica L. Filler Tieszen Law Office Prof. LLC PO Box 550 Pierre, SD 57501 Letter Decision and Order RE:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Case No.
More informationDIVISION 2 WORKER S COMPENSATION
DIVISION 2 WORKER S COMPENSATION CHAPTER 10 WORKER S COMPENSATION COMMISSION 10100. Reports: Forms Authorized. 10101. Same: Forms Prescribed and Authorized. 10102. Notices and Reports May be Filed With
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MARCH 13, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-000056-MR RAMONA SPINKS, EXECUTRIX OF THE WILL OF BENJAMIN SPINKS, DECEASED APPELLANT APPEAL
More informationA Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
More informationYour. Product Disclosure Statement and Insurance Policy
Your Product Disclosure Statement and Insurance Policy In arranging this insurance Defence Bank Limited ABN 57 087 651 385 AFSL /Australian Credit Licence 234582 is acting pursuant to an agreement with
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 53 Article 21 1
Article 21. Reverse Mortgages. 53-255. Title. This Article shall be known and may be cited as the Reverse Mortgage Act. (1991, c. 546, s. 1; 1995, c. 115, s. 1.) 53-256. Purpose. It is the intent of the
More informationManagement liability - Employment practices liability Policy wording
Special definitions for this section Benefits Claim Defence costs The General terms and conditions and the following terms and conditions all apply to this section. Any compensation awarded to an employee
More informationOFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT KELLY MINICH AND DEBBIE MINICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego v. Plaintiffs, Case No.
More informationOur standard terms and conditions for Your Advanced Personal Loan.
Our standard terms and conditions for Your Advanced Personal Loan. For loans approved on or after 6 June 2015 6 June 2015 Important Information The information set out below forms part of your disclosure
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-00802-CW Document 90 Filed 02/02/15 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MURIELLE MOLIERE, Plaintiff, v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE, et al., Defendants.
More informationS.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth
S.116 Of The Courts of Justice Act Can Defendants Impose A Structured Settlement on the Plaintiff? Robert Roth Historically, at common law, a plaintiff was not obliged to accept a structured settlement,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION IN RE: : : CASE NO. 99-71191 SGE MORTGAGE FUNDING : CORPORATION, : CHAPTER 11 : Debtor, : ADVERSARY PROCEEDING : NO. 00-7013
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 6/30/11 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More information2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227
More informationD. Idaho. In re Kenneth Wayne THOMASON and Sandra Fay Thomason, Debtors. No. 12 41121 JDP.
Page 1 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho. In re Kenneth Wayne THOMASON and Sandra Fay Thomason, Debtors. No. 12 41121 JDP. Feb. 19, 2013. John O.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. ------------------------------------------ 2013: February 17, 25 ----------------------------------------- DECISION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES GRENADA GRENADA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2010/0436 BETWEEN: GORDON ALPHONSUS ST. BERNARD (Beneficiary and Personal
More informationCHAPTER 99: 05 ACCIDENTAL DEATHS AND PERSONAL INJURIES (DAMAGES) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I
LAWS OF GUYANA 3 CHAPTER 99: 05 ACCIDENTAL DEATHS AND PERSONAL INJURIES (DAMAGES) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART I 3. Cause of action when death is caused by
More informationDebt Recovery Guidance Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of 5 The guidance provided does not cover Insolvency Law but further details can be provided on request. Legal proceedings cannot be commenced until this deadline has passed. ROLE OF THE COURTS
More informationConsensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel
Consensus of Judges on Multnomah County Court Foreclosure Panel The judges who serve on the Multnomah County Court s Foreclosure Panel have been presented with the following recurring issues, which over
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2009-150 UNITED STATES TAX COURT KENNETH D. AND TRUDI A. WOODARD,
More informationCase 0:12-cv-60597-JIC Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/13 12:33:23 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-60597-JIC Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/13 12:33:23 Page 1 LISA KOWALSKI, a Florida resident, v. Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Michigan
More informationSupreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014
South Australia Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014 SCHEDULE 3 APPROVED FORMS Schedule 3 Approved Forms relate to Supreme Court Civil Supplementary Rules 2014, dated 2nd September 2014, that came
More informationAPPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on
APPROVED Movant shall serve copies of this ORDER on any pro se parties, pursuant to CRCP 5, and file a certificate of service with the Court within 10 days. Dated: Jul 26, 2010 Catherine A. Lemon District
More informationLAFOURCHE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #3 CIVIL SERVICE BOARD RULES RULE I
LAFOURCHE PARISH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #3 CIVIL SERVICE BOARD RULES MEETING OF THE BOARD: RULE I SECTION 2: SECTION 3: SECTION 4: SECTION 5: SECTION 6: The board shall hold one regular meeting within
More informationCHAPTER 2013-137. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87
CHAPTER 2013-137 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 87 An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing an
More informationSTATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DIVISION OF MORTGAGE LENDING In re: J.H.S. Moxie Corp., and Jacqueline O Shaughnessy, Respondent. * * * STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 1 STIPULATED
More information2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
More informationCase 06-01220 Doc 40 Filed 04/15/08 Entered 04/15/08 15:36:45 Main Document Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE : CASE NO. 06-10179 OCA, INC., et al. SECTION B DEBTORS CHAPTER 11 Jointly Administered OCA, INC. AND OCA OUTSOURCE, INC.
More informationCODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb0087-00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MINOR CHILDREN
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA vs. Plaintiff, Defendant.,, Civil Action Case Number SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MINOR CHILDREN This is an agreement between (referred to here as
More informationRules of the Court of Arbitration. of the Central Securities Depository of Poland (KDPW) I. General provisions
Rules of the Court of Arbitration of the Central Securities Depository of Poland (KDPW) I. General provisions 1. Jurisdiction and organisation of the Court of Arbitration of the Central Securities Depository
More informationRule 3023-1 Special Procedures in Chapter 13 Matters. This Local Rule shall govern all cases filed under chapter 13 of the Code.
Rule 3023-1 Special Procedures in Chapter 13 Matters. This Local Rule shall govern all cases filed under chapter 13 of the Code. (a) Section 1326 Payments. (i) (ii) The debtor shall, after commencing timely
More informationMedical Liability Insurance Related Problems and Damages in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Stephen Ballantine
Medical Liability Insurance Related Problems and Damages in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Stephen Ballantine 3 rd Arab Conference on Medical Liability Workshop 12 November 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Objectives
More informationBSP Life (Fiji) Limited. Contents. General Terms and Conditions
BSP Life (Fiji) Limited General Terms and Conditions Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. Definitions and Interpretation...4 3. Base Cover Benefit...66 4. General...88 5 Claim Information...1212 6 Policy Exclusions...1414
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE MANUFACTURERS LIFE CIVIL ACTION INSURANCE COMPANY, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO NORTH AMERICAN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY NO. 96-4053
More informationCase 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BUSINESS LENDERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 05-50-B-C RITANNE CAVANAUGH GAZAK,
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )
[Cite as Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Dvorak, 2014-Ohio-4652.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee
More informationCase 1-10-01074-cec Doc 22 Filed 03/05/12 Entered 03/05/12 16:33:23
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x In re EILEEN JOY GRODETZKY, Debtor. --------------------------------------------------------x
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 K.M.W. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. C.S. Appellant No. 85 MDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Entered December 16, 2014 In the Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationCase 2:12-cv-02198-JWS Document 113 Filed 05/12/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:12-cv-02198-JWS Document 113 Filed 05/12/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Mary M. Murphy, individually and as conservator for her minor children, W. M. and L. M.,
More informationTerms of Business - Effective from January 2015
Terms of Business - Effective from January 2015 Gowran Insurance Consultants Ltd t/a McGowan Insurances These Terms of Business set out the general terms under which our firm will provide business services
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. V. : C.A. No. NC 1996-0473 D E C I S I O N
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS NEWPORT, SC. SUPERIOR COURT CARD ESTABLISHMENT SERVICES, : INC., AS ASSIGNEE OF PEACHTREE : BANKCARD CORPORATION : V. : C.A. No. NC 1996-0473 THE MAC SHOP,
More informationHERMUS CYRUS CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE. 2011: June 29 2012: February 7 JUDGMENT
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 232 OF 2008 BETWEEN: HERMUS CYRUS v CHRISTOPHER WYLLIE Claimant Defendant Appearances:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA IN CIVIL DIVISION CLAIM NO 1999 CL W- 035
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA IN CIVIL DIVISION CLAIM NO 1999 CL W- 035 IN CHAMBERS BETWEEN HAZEL WRIGHT CLAIMANT (Near relation of Robert Phillips, deceased) AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEFENDANT
More informationIn force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS
In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS Contents I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1 Purpose of these Regulations... 4 2 Applicability to different staff
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, v. Adv. No.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA In Re JUNG BEA HAN and Case No. 00-42086 HYUNG SOOK HAN, Debtors. JUNG BEA HAN, Plaintiff. v. Adv. No. 05-03012 GE CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE
More informationDisclaimer Financial Adviser s Guide
Cessions Financial Adviser s Guide for Cessions 8 September 2009 347 Disclaimer Financial Adviser s Guide PPS Insurance, in making this guide available, is not supplying advice, making any recommendation
More informationWA - Builders - Home Warranty Insurance Application Form
Commercial & General Insurance Brokers (Aust) Pty Ltd Suite 4, 1016 Doncaster Road Doncaster East Victoria 3109 Phone: 1300 764 244 Fax: 03 8841 42 99 Email: home.warranty@cgib.com.au Web: www.cgib.com.au
More informationBusiness Charge Card and Business Credit Card Terms and Conditions
Business Charge Card and Business Credit Card DECEMBER 2014 CONTENTS 1. Use of Your Business Credit Card or Business Charge Card 3 2. Making and Stopping Payments 4 3. Payments and Statements 4 4. Refunds
More informationLocal Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005.
RULE 2084-1. SCOPE CHAPTER 13 RULES Local Rules 2084-1 through 2084-26 govern chapter 13 practice in cases filed after October 16, 2005. RULE 2084-2. FILING REQUIREMENTS (a) Application to Pay Fee in Installments.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CRISTOBAL COLON, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary
More informationNorthern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski
MONTGOMERY COUNTY LAW REPORTER 140-301 2003 MBA 30 Northern Ins. Co. of New York v. Resinski [140 M.C.L.R., Part II Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Resinski APPEAL and ERROR Motion for Summary
More informationSaffron Building Society Mortgages Savings Investments Insurance Loans. Residential mortgage conditions. www.saffronbs.co.
Saffron Building Society Mortgages Savings Investments Insurance Loans Residential mortgage conditions www.saffronbs.co.uk 0800 072 1100 Saffron Building Society Residential Mortgage Conditions (England
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A. D., 2013 BETWEEN (PROPRIETORS OF STRATA (DAC HOLDINGS LIMITED -----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A. D., 2013 CLAIM NO. 256 OF 2010 BETWEEN (PROPRIETORS OF STRATA CLAIMANT (PLAN 10 ( (AND ( (DAC HOLDINGS LIMITED DEFENDANT ----- BEFORE THE HONORABLE MADAM JUSTICE MICHELLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1998 1. JOHN BERTRAM CODDARD 2. THERESA Z.P. CODDARD AND
SAINT LUCIA SUIT NO: 676 of 1993 BETWEEN Appearances: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1998 Mr E Calderon for the Plaintiffs Mr LA Williams for the Defendants 1. JOHN BERTRAM CODDARD 2. THERESA
More informationCHAPTER 81. LAWS OF WISCONSIN-CH. 81 121. No. 52, S.] [Published May 9, 1941.
LAWS OF WISCONSIN-CH. 81 121 No. 52, S.] [Published May 9, 1941. CHAPTER 81. AN ACT to create 268.22 to 268.34 of the statutes, providing for the disposition of property of absentees unheard of for a certain
More informationEMPLOYEE BENEFITS LIABILITY COVERAGE
POLICY NUMBER: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 04 35 12 07 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS LIABILITY COVERAGE THIS ENDORSEMENT PROVIDES CLAIMS-MADE COVERAGE.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GELT FINANCIAL CORPORATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4362 v. PERFORMANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY and COSTELLO & ASSOCIATES
More informationGIO Workers Compensation. New South Wales Insurance Policy
GIO Workers Compensation New South Wales Insurance Policy Part 1 Preliminary 1. Definitions In this policy: Employer means the person insured under this Policy, being the person named as the Employer in
More informationfirst direct Money Market Account Terms and Conditions
first direct Money Market Account Terms and Conditions first direct Money Market Account Terms and Conditions These Money Market Terms and Conditions (the Money Market Terms ) are Additional Conditions
More informationIN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 NOT REPORTABLE IN THE SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 46854/2009 DATE: 29/04/2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE REPORTABLE: YES/NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES/NO
More informationLawCover. Professional Indemnity Insurance Policy 2009/2010 116693148 \ 0421663 \ AZO01
LawCover Professional Indemnity Insurance Policy 2009/2010 116693148 \ 0421663 \ AZO01 This Policy sets out the conditions on which we agree to insure you. When reading this Policy, please note the use
More information2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 10/17/14 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 184 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:14-cv-12923-AC-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 10/17/14 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 184 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION STAMATIA KOSTOPOULOS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 14-12923 ONEWEST
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2014-1 UNITED STATES TAX COURT STEVEN C. GIST AND CONSTANCE L. GIST,
More information