# Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

## Transcription

1 Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium When players move sequentially and have private information, some of the Bayesian Nash equilibria may involve strategies that are not sequentially rational. The problem is that there are usually no proper subgames. That means that all BNE are subgame perfect. We need to modify the idea of subgame perfection so that we are able to evaluate sequential rationality at all information sets. The following version of the Gift Game is a good illustration. Here, player 2 prefers the gift to be coming from a friend, but she would rather accept a gift from an enemy than to refuse the gift.

2

3 For this game, (N F N E,R) is a BNE. Since there are no proper subgames, this is subgame perfect. Notice that it is clearly irrational for player 2 to refuse a gift, because her payoff from accepting is always greater than her payoff from refusing. This strategy profile is not ruled out as a subgame perfect NE, because player 2 s information set does start a subgame, and switching to A in the full game does not improve her payoff, since her information set is not reached. But how to reject this equilibrium? The concept of Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE) addresses this problem. A PBE combines a strategy profile and conditional beliefs that players have about the other players types at every information set. This will allow us to evaluate sequential rationality by computing the expected payoff of every continuation strategy at every information set.

4 Conditional Beliefs about Other Players Types In Gift Game 2, player 2 has initial beliefs that player 1 is type F with probability p and type E with probability 1 p. Notice that these are beliefs about type, not beliefs about player 1 s strategy that we talked about earlier in the course. Player 2 s belief conditional on reaching her information set depends on Nature s probabilities and player 1 s strategy. For example, if player 1 s strategy is N F G E, then being offered a gift causes her to update her beliefs about player 1 s type. Her conditional beliefs are that player 1 is type E with probability one. If player 1 s strategy is G F N E, then her conditional beliefs are that player 1 is type F with probability one.

5 If player 1 s strategy is G F G E, then there is no new information revealed by having a gift offered. Her conditional beliefs are that player 1 is type F with probability p and type E with probability 1 p. If player 1 s strategy is N F N E,beingoffered a gift is a "surprise," but player 2 still should have some beliefs conditional on the "surprise" offer of a gift. More on that later.

6 Sequential Rationality Specifying beliefs about the other players types, conditional on reaching each information set, allows us to evaluate each player s best response to the strategy profile of the other players at every information set, even at information sets that are not reached given those strategies. Equivalently, beliefs can be about the various nodes in an information set, conditional on reaching that information set. Consider again Gift Game 2. Let q denote player 2 s probability assessment (belief) that player 1 is type F, conditional on reaching the information set in which she is offered a gift. Then player 2 s belief that player 1 is type E is 1 q. It is easy to see that player 2 s payoff from A is greater than her payoff from R, for any value of q. Thus, the sequentially rational action is A, no matter what her beliefs. This rules out the (N F N E,R) BNE.

7 In the original Gift Game, the sequentially rational strategy for player 2 now depends on her beliefs about player 1 s type. Again let q denote player 2 s belief that player 1 is type F, conditional on reaching the information set in which she is offered a gift. If she rejects the offer, her payoff is 0. If player 2 accepts the offer, her expected payoff is q 1+ (1 q) ( 1) = 2q 1. This expected payoff is greater than zero if and only if q> 1 2 (that is, she believes that player1ismorelikelytobeafriend). Thus, the sequentially rational action is A if and only if q> 1 2.

8

9 Consistency of Beliefs For a given strategy profile, are all possible beliefs consistent with rational play? No, rational players use Bayes rule "whenever possible." For example, in the Gift Game, we have q = pr(f gift offer) = p pr(gift offer F ) p pr(gift offer F )+(1 p) pr(gift offer E). When player 1 s strategy is N F G E,theformulabecomes q = p 0 p 0+(1 p) 1 =0. When player 1 s strategy is G F G E,theformulabecomes q = p 1 p 1+(1 p) 1 = p.

10 We can use Bayes rule to update beliefs when player 1 uses a mixed strategy. Suppose that player 1 offers a gift with probability α F when type F,andheoffers a gift with probability α E when type E. Then player 2 s belief is q = pr(f gift offer) = p pr(gift offer F ) p pr(gift offer F )+(1 p) pr(gift offer E) = p α F p α F +(1 p) α E. What should player 2 believe if player 1 never offers a gift (so α F = α F =0)? The formula gives q = 0 0,so that we cannot evaluate the expression. [Note: 0/0 is not zero; it is indeterminate.] Bayes rule cannot be applied in this case, so we consider any beliefs to be consistent.

11 A Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium is a strategy profile and a specification of beliefs that each player has about the other players types. Definition: Consider a strategy profile for all players, as well as beliefs about the other players types at all information sets. This strategy profile and belief system is a Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium (PBE) if: (1) sequential rationality at each information set, each player s strategy specifies optimal actions, given her beliefs and the strategies of the other players, and (2) consistent beliefs given the strategy profile, the beliefs are consistent with Bayes rule whenever possible. Note: In Watson s definition, beliefs are about the probability of each of the nodes in an information set, conditional on reaching that information set. This is equivalent to beliefs about types.

12 Signaling Games The PBE solution is well-suited as a solution to signaling games, where player 1 observes some information (his type) and takes an action. Player 2, who does not observe player 1 s type directly but observes his action, updates her beliefs about player 1 s type, and takes an action herself. If player 1 has two possible types, then pure-strategy PBE are either separating or pooling. In a separating equilibrium, player 1 s types choose different actions, so player 2 will be able to infer player 1 s type by observing his action. In a pooling equilibrium, player 1 s types choose the same action, so player 2 s updated beliefs about player 1 s type (after observing his action) are the same as her prior beliefs. If player 1 has more than two possible types, then "partial pooling" equilibria are also possible.

13 Examples of signaling games include: 1. Our two versions of the Gift Game. 2. Job-Market Signaling. Player 1 is a job applicant of either high or low productivity. Player 2 is an employer who seeks to offer the applicant a competitive wage equal to player 1 s expected productivity. High productivity types may have an incentive to undertake a costly activity (get an MBA) that does not directly enhance productivity. Because the MBA is more costly for the low types than the high types, we have a separating equilibrium. 3. Advertising. Player 1 is a firm whose product quality is either high or low. A high quality firm may have an incentive to engage in costly advertising to signal its quality. Advertising gets consumers to try the product, but a high quality firm receives repeat purchases while a low quality firm does not.

14 4. Cheap-Talk Games. Player 1 is an expert who observes a piece of information crucial for player 2 s decision. Player 1 could be an entrepreneur with an idea for a startup venture, and player 2 could be a venture capitalist deciding how much money to invest. Only player 1 knows the true value of the project. Player 1 gives some advice about how much money should be invested, and player 2 makes a decision. Because payoffs depend on the true value of the project and the money invested, the advice itself is "cheap talk." If player 1 has a bias in favor of higher investment but there is some degree of common interest, there may be PBE in which some information is credibly revealed. 5. The Beer and Quiche Game. The title of this game is based on the book in the 1980 s, Real Men Don t Eat Quiche.

15 2,1 0,0 3,0 1,1 N F N F 2 Q Q strong Nature weak B B 2 N F N F 3,1 1,0 2,0 0,1 Beer and Quiche

16 First, notice that there cannot be a separating equilibrium. If the strong and weak types choose different actions, player 2 will infer player 1 s type correctly and fight the weak type. Therefore, the weak type is not bestresponding. There are two classes of separating PBE. Equilibrium 1: Strong and weak types of player 1 choose B. Player 2 fights if he observes Q, but not if he observes B. Beliefs: Player 2 uses Bayes rule if he observes B, and believes that player 1 is strong w.p Player 2 believes that player 1 is at least as likely to be weak as strong if he observes Q. Any belief that assigns probability of at least one-half to the weak type will do. Given the beliefs, player 2 s strategy is sequentially rational. The beliefs are consistent. Given player 2 s strategy, player 1 s strategy is seqentially rational. A weak player 1 receives a payoff of 2, but deviating to Q would give him a payoff of1,duetothefactthatplayer2isprepared to fight.

17 Equilibrium 2: Strong and weak types of player 1 choose Q. Player 2 fights if he observes B, but not if he observes Q. Beliefs: Player 2 uses Bayes rule if he observes Q, and believes that player 1 is strong w.p Player 2 believes that player 1 is at least as likely to be weak as strong if he observes B. Given the beliefs, player 2 s strategy is sequentially rational. The beliefs are consistent. Given player 2 s strategy, player 1 s strategy is seqentially rational. A strong player 1 receives a payoff of 2, but deviating to B would give him a payoff of1,duetothefactthatplayer2isprepared to fight.

18 This game illustrates that our requirement that beliefs be consistent sometimes still allows some "weird" beliefs off the equilibrium path, where Bayes rule does not apply. Here is the problem: consistency does not take into account the fact that a weak player 1 is receiving a payoff of3bychoosingq,andthereisnotwaytogetahigher payoff by deviating to B, no matter what player 2 does. A strong player 1 could consider B, hoping that player 2 chooses not to fight. Thus, player 2 should infer that anyone deviating to B must be strong, and not fight.

19

20 Example of PBE: Solving the 3 Card Poker Game We will denote player 1 with an ace as type 1A, player 2 with a queen as type 2Q, etc. We will find the PBE by figuring out which types of which players choose pure actions, and which types will be mixing. Then we can use Bayes rule to determine beliefs and the mixing probabilities. First, we know that player 1A will always bet his ace. We also know that player 2A will always call with her ace, and that player 2Q will always fold with her queen.

21 What will player 1K choose? Conditional on the information set in which player 1 s card is a king, his beliefs about player 2 s type is that she is type 2A with probability one half and type 2Q with probability one half. Suppose player 1K bets. We know that when player 2 is type 2A, she will call and player 1 will receive 2, and when player 2 is type 2Q, she will fold and player 1 will receive +1. Therefore, the expected payoff from betting is 1 2 ( 2) (1) = 1 2. Since the expected payoff from folding is 1, betting is the sequentially rational choice, given his beliefs and what we know about player 2 s strategy.

22 What will player 1Q choose? I will argue that in any PBE, player 1Q must mix between folding and betting. If player 1Q always folds, then the sequentially rational choice for player 2K is to always fold, since player 2K would know that player 1 is type 1A when her information set is reached. But if player 2K always folds, player 1Q does not want to fold, since her expected payoff from betting would be zero. This is a contradiction, so player 1Q cannot always fold. If player 1Q always bets, then player 2K (from Bayes rule) must believe that player 1 is equally likely to be type 1A or 1Q, so she receives an expected payoff of zero by calling and a payoff of 1 by folding. Therefore, the sequentially rational choice for player 2K is to call. But if player 2K always calls, then player 1Q does not want to bet, another contradiction.

23 Thus, in the PBE, player 1Q must be indifferent between "bet" and "fold," and choose to bet with some probability, p, and fold with probability 1 p. Bythesameargument,player2Kmustbeindifferent between "fold" and "call," and choose to call with some probability, q, and fold with probability 1 q. Part of the equilibrium of this game involves player 1Q bluffing with what he knows is a losing hand, and it involves player 2K calling when she can only beat a bluff, to "keep player 1 honest." We will now solve for the probabilities, p and q.

24 Let us compute the expected payoff forplayer1qwhenhe bets. With probability 1 2, player 2 is type 2A and always calls the bet, in which case player 1Q receives 2. Also with probability 1 2, player 2 is type 2K and calls with probability q and folds with probability 1 q. Then the probability of player 2 being type 2K and calling (player 1Q receiving a payoff of 2) is 1 2q and the probability of player 2 being type 2K and folding (player 1Q receiving apayoff of 1) is 1 2 (1 q). Player 1Q s expected payoff when he bets is therefore 1 2 ( 2) q( 2) + 1 (1 q)(1) 2 For player 1Q to be indifferent between betting and folding, we have 1 2 ( 2) q( 2) + 1 (1 q)(1) 2 = 1 q = 1 3.

25 As we just showed, player 1Q s indifference condition determines the probability that player 2K calls the bet, which is 1 3 of the time. To find the probability with which player 1Q bets, we impose the condition that player 2K is indifferent between calling and folding. The expected payoff of player 2K when she folds is 1. The expected payoff of player 2K when she calls the bet is pr(1a 2K and 1 bets)( 2) + pr(1q 2K and 1 bets)(2). To proceed, we need to determine which beliefs about player 1 s type satisfy our consistency requirement. We must use Bayes rule to find the consistent beliefs that player 2K has about player 1 s type, conditional on reaching her information set.

26 We have pr(1a 2K and 1 bets) = pr(2k and 1 bets 1A)pr(1A) pr(2k and 1 bets 1A)pr(1A)+pr(2K and 1 bets 1Q)pr(1Q) Substitute into the above expression: pr(1a) = pr(1q) = 1 3 pr(2k and 1 bets 1A) = 1 2 pr(2k and 1 bets 1Q) = 1 2 p, yielding pr(1a 2K and 1 bets) = p 13 = 1 1+p.

27 The remaining probability must be that player 1 is type 1Q, so pr(1q 2K and 1 bets) = p 1+p. Now we can compute the expected payoff of player 2K when she calls the bet, = pr(1a 2K and 1 bets)( 2) + pr(1q 2K and 1 bets)(2) 1 1+p ( 2) + p 1+p (2). Setting this payoff equal to the payoff from folding, 1, we can solve for p to get p = 1 3. Player 1Q bluffs by betting with his queen one third of the time.

28 Recapping, the PBE strategy profile is given by player 1: type 1A bets, type 1K bets, type 1Q bets w.p. 1 3 and folds w.p player 2: type 2A calls, type 2K calls w.p. w.p. 2 3, type 2Q folds. 1 3 and folds The PBE beliefs are given by player 1: type 1A believes player 2 is type 2K w.p. 1 2 w.p type 1K believes player 2 is type 2A w.p. 1 2 w.p type 1Q believes player 2 is type 2A w.p. 1 2 w.p and type 2Q and type 2Q and type 2K

29 player 2 (at her information sets following player 1 betting): type 2A believes player 1 is type 1K w.p. 3 4 w.p and type 1Q type 2K believes player 1 is type 1A w.p. 3 4 w.p and type 1Q type 2Q believes player 1 is type 1A w.p. 1 2 w.p and type 1K Which player would you rather be? One can compute thattheexanteexpectedpayoff forplayer1inthebne is 1 9, and the ex ante expected payoff forplayer2is1 9.

### Economics 200C, Spring 2012 Practice Midterm Answer Notes

Economics 200C, Spring 2012 Practice Midterm Answer Notes I tried to write questions that are in the same form, the same length, and the same difficulty as the actual exam questions I failed I think that

### Microeconomic Theory Jamison / Kohlberg / Avery Problem Set 4 Solutions Spring 2012. (a) LEFT CENTER RIGHT TOP 8, 5 0, 0 6, 3 BOTTOM 0, 0 7, 6 6, 3

Microeconomic Theory Jamison / Kohlberg / Avery Problem Set 4 Solutions Spring 2012 1. Subgame Perfect Equilibrium and Dominance (a) LEFT CENTER RIGHT TOP 8, 5 0, 0 6, 3 BOTTOM 0, 0 7, 6 6, 3 Highlighting

### 21. Unverifiable Investment, Hold Up, Options and Ownership

21. Unverifiable Investment, Hold Up, Options and Ownership This chapter applies the tools of games with joint decisions and negotiation equilibrium to study the hold up problem in economics. We first

### Poker with a Three Card Deck 1

Poker with a Three Card Deck We start with a three card deck containing one Ace, one King and one Queen. Alice and Bob are each dealt one card at random. There is a pot of \$ P (and we assume P 0). Alice

### University of Oslo Department of Economics

University of Oslo Department of Economics Exam: ECON3200/4200 Microeconomics and game theory Date of exam: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 Grades are given: December 17, 2013 Duration: 14:30-17:30 The problem

### The Plaintiff s Attorney in the Liability Insurance Claims Settlement Process: A Game Theoretic Approach

The Plaintiff s Attorney in the Liability Insurance Claims Settlement Process: A Game Theoretic Approach Lisa L. Posey * Abstract: The decision of a claimant to obtain legal counsel, the timing of this

### Game Theory and Poker

Game Theory and Poker Jason Swanson April, 2005 Abstract An extremely simplified version of poker is completely solved from a game theoretic standpoint. The actual properties of the optimal solution are

### Dartmouth College. Sandbagging in One-Card Poker

Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire Sandbagging in One-Card Poker A Thesis in Mathematics By: Daniel Hugh Miao Advisor: Peter Doyle 04 Abstract In 950, Kuhn developed a simplified version of poker

### ??? Signaling Games???

??? Signaling Games??? In incomplete information games, one player knows more information than the other player. So far, we have focused on the case where the type of the more informed player was known

### FINAL EXAM, Econ 171, March, 2015, with answers

FINAL EXAM, Econ 171, March, 2015, with answers There are 9 questions. Answer any 8 of them. Good luck! Problem 1. (True or False) If a player has a dominant strategy in a simultaneous-move game, then

### Economics of Insurance

Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow

### Labor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 3: Education, Selection, and Signaling

Labor Economics, 14.661. Lecture 3: Education, Selection, and Signaling Daron Acemoglu MIT November 3, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Education, Selection, and Signaling November 3, 2011. 1 / 31 Introduction

### Bonus Maths 2: Variable Bet Sizing in the Simplest Possible Game of Poker (JB)

Bonus Maths 2: Variable Bet Sizing in the Simplest Possible Game of Poker (JB) I recently decided to read Part Three of The Mathematics of Poker (TMOP) more carefully than I did the first time around.

### Simon Fraser University Spring 2015. Econ 302 D200 Final Exam Solution Instructor: Songzi Du Tuesday April 21, 2015, 12 3 PM

Simon Fraser University Spring 2015 Econ 302 D200 Final Exam Solution Instructor: Songzi Du Tuesday April 21, 2015, 12 3 PM The brief solutions suggested here may not have the complete explanations necessary

### Backward Induction and Subgame Perfection

Backward Induction and Subgame Perfection In extensive-form games, we can have a Nash equilibrium profile of strategies where player 2 s strategy is a best response to player 1 s strategy, but where she

### Introduction to Game Theory Lecture 7: Bayesian Games

Introduction to Game Theory Lecture 7: Bayesian Games Haifeng Huang University of California, Merced Shanghai, Summer 2011 Games of Incomplete Information: Bayesian Games In the games we have studies so

### EconS 503 - Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Cheap Talk

EconS 53 - Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Cheap Talk. Cheap talk with Stockbrokers (From Tadelis, Ch. 8, Exercise 8.) A stockbroker can give his client one of three recommendations regarding a certain

### Why Plaintiffs Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts

Why Plaintiffs Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts Winand Emons 1 Claude Fluet 2 1 Department of Economics University of Bern, CEPR, CIRPEE 2 Université du Québec à Montréal,

### Nash Equilibria and. Related Observations in One-Stage Poker

Nash Equilibria and Related Observations in One-Stage Poker Zach Puller MMSS Thesis Advisor: Todd Sarver Northwestern University June 4, 2013 Contents 1 Abstract 2 2 Acknowledgements 3 3 Literature Review

### Lecture V: Mixed Strategies

Lecture V: Mixed Strategies Markus M. Möbius February 26, 2008 Osborne, chapter 4 Gibbons, sections 1.3-1.3.A 1 The Advantage of Mixed Strategies Consider the following Rock-Paper-Scissors game: Note that

### Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction:

Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Keywords Ben Edelman, Harvard Michael Ostrovsky, Stanford GSB Michael Schwarz, Yahoo! Research A Few

### I d Rather Stay Stupid: The Advantage of Having Low Utility

I d Rather Stay Stupid: The Advantage of Having Low Utility Lior Seeman Department of Computer Science Cornell University lseeman@cs.cornell.edu Abstract Motivated by cost of computation in game theory,

### 6.207/14.15: Networks Lectures 19-21: Incomplete Information: Bayesian Nash Equilibria, Auctions and Introduction to Social Learning

6.207/14.15: Networks Lectures 19-21: Incomplete Information: Bayesian Nash Equilibria, Auctions and Introduction to Social Learning Daron Acemoglu and Asu Ozdaglar MIT November 23, 25 and 30, 2009 1 Introduction

### ECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 March 23 ADVERSE SELECTION SCREENING AND SIGNALING. EXAMPLE 1 FAILURE OF EQUILIBRIUM Akerlof s Lemons

ECO 199 GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 March 23 ADVERSE SELECTION SCREENING AND SIGNALING EXAMPLE 1 FAILURE OF EQUILIBRIUM Akerlof s Lemons Private used car market Car may be worth anywhere between

### Online Appendix Feedback Effects, Asymmetric Trading, and the Limits to Arbitrage

Online Appendix Feedback Effects, Asymmetric Trading, and the Limits to Arbitrage Alex Edmans LBS, NBER, CEPR, and ECGI Itay Goldstein Wharton Wei Jiang Columbia May 8, 05 A Proofs of Propositions and

### Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 10: Extensive Games: Critiques and Extensions

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 0: Extensive Games: Critiques and Extensions March 3, 0 Summary: We discuss a game called the centipede game, a simple extensive game where the prediction made by backwards

### Capital Structure. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Capital Structure Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Debt and Equity There are two main types of financing: debt and equity. Consider a two-period world with dates 0 and 1. At

### Cheap Talk : Multiple Senders and Multiple Receivers

Corso di Laurea in Economia indirizzo Models and Methods of Quantitative Economics Prova finale di Laurea Cheap Talk : Multiple Senders and Multiple Receivers Relatore Prof. Piero Gottardi Laureando Arya

### Non-Exclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons

Non-Exclusive Competition in the Market for Lemons Andrea Attar Thomas Mariotti François Salanié October 2007 Abstract In order to check the impact of the exclusivity regime on equilibrium allocations,

### 2. Information Economics

2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many

### Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Ù

Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Page 1 Infinitely Repeated Games with Discounting Ù Introduction 1 Discounting the future 2 Interpreting the discount factor 3 The average discounted payoff 4

### Industry profit in an oligopoly (sum of all firms profits) < monopoly profit.

Collusion. Industry profit in an oligopoly (sum of all firms profits) < monopoly profit. Price lower and industry output higher than in a monopoly. Firms lose because of non-cooperative behavior : Each

### Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets

Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that

### Bayesian Nash Equilibrium

. Bayesian Nash Equilibrium . In the final two weeks: Goals Understand what a game of incomplete information (Bayesian game) is Understand how to model static Bayesian games Be able to apply Bayes Nash

### Mixed Strategies and Mixed Strategy Equilibrium

Chapter 4 Mied trategies and Mied trateg quilibrium Mied trateg Two kind of strategies: pure mied Two kinds of equilibrium pure strateg mied strateg Two games with mied strateg equilibria: Matching Pennies

### 6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 15: Repeated Games and Cooperation

6.207/14.15: Networks Lecture 15: Repeated Games and Cooperation Daron Acemoglu and Asu Ozdaglar MIT November 2, 2009 1 Introduction Outline The problem of cooperation Finitely-repeated prisoner s dilemma

### Part 2: Screening and Signaling in Games with Incomplete Information.

Lecture 9 Part 2: Screening and Signaling in Games with Incomplete Information. 1 Lecture Outline Screening and signaling incentives arise in games where uncertainty is exogenous and some players are better

### Chapter 5 End of Chapter Review Question KEY

Chapter End of Chapter Review Question KEY - (Key Question) Complete the following table and answer the questions below: Units consumed Total utility Marginal utility 0 0 0 0 0 a. At which rate is total

### ECON 40050 Game Theory Exam 1 - Answer Key. 4) All exams must be turned in by 1:45 pm. No extensions will be granted.

1 ECON 40050 Game Theory Exam 1 - Answer Key Instructions: 1) You may use a pen or pencil, a hand-held nonprogrammable calculator, and a ruler. No other materials may be at or near your desk. Books, coats,

### Chapter 7. Sealed-bid Auctions

Chapter 7 Sealed-bid Auctions An auction is a procedure used for selling and buying items by offering them up for bid. Auctions are often used to sell objects that have a variable price (for example oil)

### Financial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Financial Markets Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Trading and Price Formation This line of the literature analyzes the formation of prices in financial markets in a setting

### Imperfect monitoring in communication networks

Journal of Economic Theory (00) www.elsevier.com/locate/jet Imperfect monitoring in communication networks Michael McBride University of California, Irvine, Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA -00, USA Received

### Minimax Strategies. Minimax Strategies. Zero Sum Games. Why Zero Sum Games? An Example. An Example

Everyone who has studied a game like poker knows the importance of mixing strategies With a bad hand, you often fold But you must bluff sometimes Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W Upton Zero Sum Games

### Economics Instructor Miller Oligopoly Practice Problems

Economics Instructor Miller Oligopoly Practice Problems 1. An oligopolistic industry is characterized by all of the following except A) existence of entry barriers. B) the possibility of reaping long run

### CPC/CPA Hybrid Bidding in a Second Price Auction

CPC/CPA Hybrid Bidding in a Second Price Auction Benjamin Edelman Hoan Soo Lee Working Paper 09-074 Copyright 2008 by Benjamin Edelman and Hoan Soo Lee Working papers are in draft form. This working paper

### ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015

ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 These notes have been used before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1

### Online Appendix for Anglo-Dutch Premium Auctions in Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam

Online Appendi for Anglo-Dutch Premium Auctions in Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam Christiaan van Bochove, Lars Boerner, Daniel Quint January, 06 The first part of Theorem states that for any, ρ > 0, and

### SYMMETRIC FORM OF THE VON NEUMANN POKER MODEL. Guido David 1, Pearl Anne Po 2

International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Volume 99 No. 2 2015, 145-151 ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version) url: http://www.ijpam.eu doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v99i2.2

### Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Game Theory Problem Set - Dynamic Games

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Game Theory Problem Set - Dynamic Games Session Problems 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 1 (no SPNE) 2 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 3 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 4 17, 18, 19 5 Test 1. The next figure shows

### MIT 15.S50 LECTURE 2. Wednesday, January 16 th, 2013

MIT 15.S50 LECTURE 2 Wednesday, January 16 th, 2013 OUTLINE: POSTFLOP PLAY 1 st Half: Continuation Betting, Fundamental Theorem of Poker, Flop Analysis 2 nd Half: Implied Odds, Set Mining, Bluffing (with

### Game Theory: Supermodular Games 1

Game Theory: Supermodular Games 1 Christoph Schottmüller 1 License: CC Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 1 / 22 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Model 3 Revision questions and exercises 2 / 22 Motivation I several solution

### Credible Termination Threats, Reputation and Private Monitoring.

Credible Termination Threats, Reputation and Private Monitoring. Olivier Compte First Version: June 2001 This Version: April 2005 Abstract In repeated principal-agent relationships, termination threats

### Economics 159: Introduction to Game Theory. Summer 2015: Session A. Online Course

Economics 159: Introduction to Game Theory Summer 2015: Session A Online Course *Syllabussubjecttochange.Checkcoursewebpageforup-to-dateinformation* This course is an introduction to game theory and strategic

### Games of Incomplete Information

Games of Incomplete Information Jonathan Levin February 00 Introduction We now start to explore models of incomplete information. Informally, a game of incomplete information is a game where the players

### On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information

Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information

### Credible Discovery, Settlement, and Negative Expected Value Suits

Credible iscovery, Settlement, and Negative Expected Value Suits Warren F. Schwartz Abraham L. Wickelgren Abstract: This paper introduces the option to conduct discovery into a model of settlement bargaining

### Signaling Games. Joel Sobel. May 31, 2007

Signaling Games Joel Sobel May 31, 2007 Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, email: jsobel@ucsd.edu. I thank the Guggenheim Foundation, NSF, and the Secretaría de Estado de Universidades

### Common Knowledge: Formalizing the Social Applications

Common Knowledge: Formalizing the Social Applications 1 Today and Thursday we ll take a step in the direction of formalizing the social puzzles, such as omission commission. 2 First, a reminder of the

### Sequential lmove Games. Using Backward Induction (Rollback) to Find Equilibrium

Sequential lmove Games Using Backward Induction (Rollback) to Find Equilibrium Sequential Move Class Game: Century Mark Played by fixed pairs of players taking turns. At each turn, each player chooses

### When Betting Odds and Credences Come Apart: More Worries for Dutch Book Arguments

When Betting Odds and Credences Come Apart: More Worries for Dutch Book Arguments Darren BRADLEY and Hannes LEITGEB If an agent believes that the probability of E being true is 1/2, should she accept a

### Chapter 14. Oligopoly

Chapter 14. Oligopoly Instructor: JINKOOK LEE Department of Economics / Texas A&M University ECON 202 504 Principles of Microeconomics Oligopoly Market Oligopoly: A market structure in which a small number

### GAMES FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS

GAMES FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS ROY/GARDNER Indiana University Nachrichtentechnische BibliotHek TUD Inv.-Nr.: /S.JOtUM- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 5" New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore Contents

### Oligopoly. Oligopoly is a market structure in which the number of sellers is small.

Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure in which the number of sellers is small. Oligopoly requires strategic thinking, unlike perfect competition, monopoly, and monopolistic competition. Under perfect

### Research Summary Saltuk Ozerturk

Research Summary Saltuk Ozerturk A. Research on Information Acquisition in Markets and Agency Issues Between Investors and Financial Intermediaries An important dimension of the workings of financial markets

### 1. Shuffling Machine: Cards used to play Casino War shall be dealt from an automatic card shuffling device ( shuffler ).

*Casino War is owned, patented and/or copyrighted by SHFL Entertainment, Inc. Please submit your agreement with Owner authorizing play of Game in your gambling establishment together with any request for

### DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY P.O. Box 208268 New Haven, CT 06520-8268

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS YALE UNIVERSITY P.O. Box 208268 New Haven, CT 06520-8268 http://www.econ.yale.edu/ Economics Department Working Paper No. 91 EQUILIBRIUM AND STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION IN THE ADVERSE

### A Battle of Informed Traders and the Market Game Foundations for Rational Expectations Equilibrium

A Battle of Informed Traders and the Market Game Foundations for Rational Expectations Equilibrium James Peck The Ohio State University Abstract Potential manipulation of prices and convergence to rational

### How to Play Blackjack Alex Powell, Jayden Dodson, Triston Williams, Michael DuVall University of North Texas TECM 1700 10/27/2014

How to Play Blackjack Alex Powell, Jayden Dodson, Triston Williams, Michael DuVall University of North Texas TECM 1700 10/27/2014 Blackjack Blackjack is a fun game that can be played either for money at

### Market Power and Efficiency in Card Payment Systems: A Comment on Rochet and Tirole

Market Power and Efficiency in Card Payment Systems: A Comment on Rochet and Tirole Luís M. B. Cabral New York University and CEPR November 2005 1 Introduction Beginning with their seminal 2002 paper,

### Using clients rejection to build trust

Using clients rejection to build trust Yuk-fai Fong Department of Economics HKUST Ting Liu Department of Economics SUNY at Stony Brook University March, 2015 Preliminary draft. Please do not circulate.

### During the last several years, poker has grown in popularity. Best Hand Wins: How Poker Is Governed by Chance. Method

Best Hand Wins: How Poker Is Governed by Chance Vincent Berthet During the last several years, poker has grown in popularity so much that some might even say it s become a social phenomenon. Whereas poker

### Games Played in a Contracting Environment

Games Played in a Contracting Environment V. Bhaskar Department of Economics University College London Gower Street London WC1 6BT February 2008 Abstract We analyze normal form games where a player has

### Arming and Arms Races

Arming and Arms Races James D. Fearon Department of Political Science Stanford University DRAFT March 24, 2011 Abstract I consider a model of arming in which states choose in successive periods whether

### Midterm March 2015. (a) Consumer i s budget constraint is. c i 0 12 + b i c i H 12 (1 + r)b i c i L 12 (1 + r)b i ;

Masters in Economics-UC3M Microeconomics II Midterm March 015 Exercise 1. In an economy that extends over two periods, today and tomorrow, there are two consumers, A and B; and a single perishable good,

### Texas Hold em. From highest to lowest, the possible five card hands in poker are ranked as follows:

Texas Hold em Poker is one of the most popular card games, especially among betting games. While poker is played in a multitude of variations, Texas Hold em is the version played most often at casinos

### Fighting an Almost Perfect Crime

Fighting an Almost Perfect Crime Online Poker Fraud Detection Philipp Schosteritsch, MSc Consultant for Software Development and Technical Advisor on Cyber Security & Privacy Foundation Graz, 2014 Contents

### Customer Service Quality and Incomplete Information in Mobile Telecommunications: A Game Theoretical Approach to Consumer Protection.

Customer Service Quality and Incomplete Information in Mobile Telecommunications: A Game Theoretical Approach to Consumer Protection.* Rafael López Zorzano, Universidad Complutense, Spain. Teodosio Pérez-Amaral,

### Laboratory work in AI: First steps in Poker Playing Agents and Opponent Modeling

Laboratory work in AI: First steps in Poker Playing Agents and Opponent Modeling Avram Golbert 01574669 agolbert@gmail.com Abstract: While Artificial Intelligence research has shown great success in deterministic

### Insurance Markets with Differential Information

Insurance Markets with Differential Information S. Hun Seog [석승훈] Graduate School of Management, KAIST (KGSM) 207-43 Cheongryangri-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul, 130-722, KOREA Email: seogsh@kgsm.kaist.ac.kr

### Individual security and network design

Individual security and network design Diego Cerdeiro Marcin Dziubiński Sanjeev Goyal FIT 2015 Motivation Networks often face external threats in form of strategic or random attacks The attacks can be

### Modeling Internet Security Investments Tackling Topological Information Uncertainty

Modeling Internet Security Investments Tackling Topological Information Uncertainty Ranjan Pal Department of Computer Science University of Southern California, USA Joint Work with Pan Hui Deutsch Telekom

### RUHR. Commitment Problems and War in International Bargaining ECONOMIC PAPERS #403. Erwin Amann Nadine Leonhardt

RUHR ECONOMIC PAPERS Erwin Amann Nadine Leonhardt Commitment Problems and War in International Bargaining #403 Imprint Ruhr Economic Papers Published by Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUB), Department of Economics

### Best-response play in partially observable card games

Best-response play in partially observable card games Frans Oliehoek Matthijs T. J. Spaan Nikos Vlassis Informatics Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 43, 98 SJ Amsterdam,

### 0.0.2 Pareto Efficiency (Sec. 4, Ch. 1 of text)

September 2 Exercises: Problem 2 (p. 21) Efficiency: p. 28-29: 1, 4, 5, 6 0.0.2 Pareto Efficiency (Sec. 4, Ch. 1 of text) We discuss here a notion of efficiency that is rooted in the individual preferences

### Moral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Principal-Agent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically

### Security Games in Online Advertising: Can Ads Help Secure the Web?

Security Games in Online Advertising: Can Ads Help Secure the Web? Nevena Vratonjic, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Maxim Raya School of Computer and Communication Sciences EPFL, Switzerland firstname.lastname@epfl.ch

### ECONOMICS OF DEBT COLLECTION: ENFORCEMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACTS

ECONOMICS OF DEBT COLLECTION: ENFORCEMENT OF CONSUMER CREDIT CONTRACTS Viktar Fedaseyeu Bocconi University Bob Hunt Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia BEROC, May 28, 2014 Debt collection Debt collection

### Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes

Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes Michael Gilligan, Leslie Johns, and B. Peter Rosendorff November 18, 2008 Technical Appendix Definitions σ(ŝ) {π [0, 1] s(π) = ŝ}

### Rafael Witten Yuze Huang Haithem Turki. Playing Strong Poker. 1. Why Poker?

Rafael Witten Yuze Huang Haithem Turki Playing Strong Poker 1. Why Poker? Chess, checkers and Othello have been conquered by machine learning - chess computers are vastly superior to humans and checkers

### ECO 199 B GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 PROBLEM SET 4 B DRAFT ANSWER KEY 100-3 90-99 21 80-89 14 70-79 4 0-69 11

The distribution of grades was as follows. ECO 199 B GAMES OF STRATEGY Spring Term 2004 PROBLEM SET 4 B DRAFT ANSWER KEY Range Numbers 100-3 90-99 21 80-89 14 70-79 4 0-69 11 Question 1: 30 points Games

### UCLA. Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory (SPRING 2011) Instructions: You have 4 hours for the exam Answer any 5 out of the 6 questions. All questions are weighted equally.

### Midterm exam PS 30 November 2005

Midterm exam PS 30 November 2005 Name: TA: Section number: This is a closed book exam. The only thing you can take into this exam is yourself and writing instruments. Everything you write should be your

### Imperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products

Imperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products available 2. characteristics or relative qualities of

### Price competition with homogenous products: The Bertrand duopoly model [Simultaneous move price setting duopoly]

ECON9 (Spring 0) & 350 (Tutorial ) Chapter Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly (Part ) Price competition with homogenous products: The Bertrand duopoly model [Simultaneous move price setting duopoly]

### Cournot s model of oligopoly

Cournot s model of oligopoly Single good produced by n firms Cost to firm i of producing q i units: C i (q i ), where C i is nonnegative and increasing If firms total output is Q then market price is P(Q),

### PAID PLACEMENT: ADVERTISING AND SEARCH ON THE INTERNET*

The Economic Journal, 121 (November), F309 F328. Doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02466.x. Ó 2011 The Author(s). The Economic Journal Ó 2011 Royal Economic Society. Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600

### From the probabilities that the company uses to move drivers from state to state the next year, we get the following transition matrix:

MAT 121 Solutions to Take-Home Exam 2 Problem 1 Car Insurance a) The 3 states in this Markov Chain correspond to the 3 groups used by the insurance company to classify their drivers: G 0, G 1, and G 2

### Combinatorics 3 poker hands and Some general probability

Combinatorics 3 poker hands and Some general probability Play cards 13 ranks Heart 4 Suits Spade Diamond Club Total: 4X13=52 cards You pick one card from a shuffled deck. What is the probability that it