1 LIABILITY OF AN ATTORNEY FOR NEGLIGENCE IN TITLE EXAMINATION - FAILURE TO DISCLOSE INFORMATION TO THE CLIENT Generally it is well understood that an attorney is not liable for every mistake or error of judgment that may occur in practice,' and it is equally understood that an attorney is not a guarantor of the titles he ~ertifies.~ It is clear, however, that with regard to title search and examination, the lawyer has much less margin for mistakes than in other areas of practice, such as litigation.3 When an attorney is employed to examine and certify title to property, a high degree of duty is imposed on him to make a thorough search of the title. If he fails to properly conduct a title search he can be held liable for negligen~e.~ The test for negligence in title examination has become widely used and accepted by most courts. An attorney must exercise reasonable care in searching title, acting to the best of his knowledge and with the proper degree of skill in order to avoid liability.= Therefore, though an attorney is not guaranteeing his opinions, courts expect the opinions to be supported by a reasonably skillful search. Exactly what is reasonable care, however, can obviously vary, and even if reasonable care is exercised in acquiring knowledge of encumbrances or other facts that may aid a 1. National Savings Bank of The District of Columbia v. Ward, 100 U.S. 195 (1879); 29 AM. JuR. PROOF OF FACTS 1, Attorney's Malpractice: Negligence In Examining Title In Real Estate Transaction (1972); Byrnes v. Palmer, 18 A.D. 1, 45 N.Y.S. 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897), aff'd, 160 N.Y. 699, 55 N.E (N.Y. 1897). 2. Byrnes v. Palmer, 18 A.D. 1,45 N.Y.S. 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897), aff'd, 160 N.Y. 699, 55 N.E (N.Y. 1897); 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client (1980); 7 AM. JUR. 20 Attorneys at Law (1980). 3. See Byrnes v. Palmer, 18 A.D. 1, 45 N.Y.S. 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897), aff'd, 160 N.Y. 699, 55 N.E (N.Y. 1897). 4. National Savings Bank of The District of Columbia v. Ward, 100 U.S. 195; Annotation, Liability of an Attorney for Negligence in Connection with the Investigation or Certification of Title to Real Estate, 59 A.L.R. 3D 1176 (1974); Red Lobster Inns of America, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 492 F. Supp. 933 (E.D. Ark. 1980), aff'd, 656 F.2d 381 (8th Cir. 1981). 5. National Savings Bank of The District of Columbia v. Ward, 100 U.S. 195; 59 A.L.R. 3D 1176, supra note 4; 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client (1980); 29 AM. JUR. PROOF OF FACTS 1, supra note 1.
2 264 The Journal of the Legal Profession [Vol. 13:263 client's decision, the attorney may still be liable for negligence in failing to disclose such fact^.^ The most common negligence claims arising in title cases usually involve failing to discover encumbrances, but attorneys have also been held liable for errors in determining ownership of title, and failing to properly describe the amount or location of property.' In a malpractice action, "the client must prove the attorney's employment and the creation of a duty to exercise his skill, the attorney's neglect of duty, that such negligence was the proximate cause of loss to the client, and the damages su~tained."~ In title search cases this usually translates into the client being able to prove (1) unmarketable title; (2) that the defect would have been discovered in the exercise of reasonable and ordinary skill, care, knowledge and diligence; and (3) that the client suffered damage in reliance on the attorney's certifi~ate.~ 11. RELATIONSHIP AND DUTY Once the attorney has entered into employment with the client for a title search, the question that must be answered is exactly what is the duty owed and the relationship presented in exercising ordinary knowledge and skill? Courts have usually imposed a strong duty on attorneys in title cases. It appears that the reason for this is because the lay person generally knows little about searching title. Therefore, the relationship between attorney and client is an important one. In Anderson v. Neal,l0 the Supreme Court of Maine explained the relationship between attorney and client in title examination cases as follows: The essence of the attorney-client relationship in title cases is the faith and trust which the client places in the representations of the attorney regarding the status of the title to the property he is about to purchase. The security of knowing that the title is good and the property is free of encumbrances is what the client purchases when he retains an attorney to search title for him." This trust relationship indicated above seems to be a general theme in 6. Owen v. Neely, 471 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. 1971) A.L.R. 3D, supra note 4, at AM. jur. PROOF OF FACTS, supra note 1, at Wlodarek v. Thrift, 178 Md. 453, 13 A.2d 774 (1940); Peters, Attorney Liability for Examination and Certification of Title to Real Estate, 12 COLO. LAW (July 1983) A.2d 1189 (Me. 1981). 11. Id. at 1192.
3 19881 Negligence in Title Examination 265 many negligence actions involving title searches,12 and may explain why an attorney's duty is so high. Once the relationship between attorney and client has been established, an attorney can be held liable for negligence if he fails to "discharge some duty which was fairly within the purview of his employment,..." and the client relied on the statements or omissions in the title certificate to his detriment.'= The degree of duty owed, however, can vary depending on the court and the facts of each case. As mentioned previously, the test used by courts in most title negligence suits is one of reasonableness. The attorney must "exercise that degree of reasonable knowledge and skill that lawyers of ordinary ability and skill possess and exercise" when he undertakes a title search.14 The Supreme Court of New Jersey in St. Pius X House of Retreats v. Camden Dioc.,lS stated very clearly the duty of an attorney under this standard as follows: What constitutes a reasonable degree of care is not to be considered in a vacuum but with reference to the type of service the attorney undertakes to perform. More specifically, where the attorney represents the purchaser of realty and has been engaged to examine title, it has been said: "It is the duty of an attorney, who is employed to investigate the title to real estate, to make a painstaking examination of the records and to report all facts relating to the title. He is therefore liable for any injury that may result to his client from negligence in the performance of his duties - that is, from a failure to exercise ordinary care and skill in discovering in the records and reporting all the deeds, mortgages, judgments, &c., that affect the title in respect to which he is employed."le The duty an attorney owes therefore is not only to search title, but also to disclose what he finds as a result of the search. For example, in Byrnes v. Palmer,17 it was stated that an attorney has the duty "to see 12. See, e.g., St. Pius X House of Retreats v. Diocese of Camden, 88 N.J. 571, 443 A.2d 1052 (1982). 13. Home Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Spence, 259 Md. 575, 270 A.2d 820, 825 (1970). 14. St. Pius X House of Retreats v. Diocese of Camden, 88 N.J. 571, 443 A.2d 1052, (1982). 15. Id. 16. Id. at 443 A.2d 1061, (quoting Jacobsen v. Petersen, 91 N.J.L. 404, 103 A. 983 (N.J. Sup. Ct. 1918), aff'd, 92 N.J.L. 631, 105 A. 894 (N.J. 1918)) A.D. 1, 45 N.Y.S. 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897), aff'd, 160 N.Y. 699, 55 N.E (N.Y. 1897).
4 266 The Journal of the Legal Profession [Vol. 13:263 that his client obtains a marketable title, and to reject titles involved in doubt, unless the client is fully informed of the nature of the risk, and is willing to accept it."18 It is important that the attorney disclose information revealed in a title search not only because courts impose such a duty, but also because disclosure is an affirmative defense to a negligence action based on improper title examination KNOWLEDGE AND DISCLOSURE Furthermore, liability for negligence may be more likely when an attorney has knowledge of a defect, yet still does not disclose it to his client. For example, in the principal case of Owen v. Neel~,~O an attorney relied on an erroneous survey description in preparing a deed to property. The record description of the property was in conflict with the survey description, yet the attorney used the survey description in the deed, which resulted in damages to his client. The attorney had recognized the discrepancy but failed to inform his client, or to find out which description was correct. The court held that: The average layman is not familiar with and ordinarily does not understand legal descriptions, and if his lawyer, accidentally or otherwise, receives information that should reasonably put him on notice of a defect we think it is his duty to investigate or report it to his client.*i Even though the attorney in the Owen case had placed a disclaimer in his title opinion, the court nevertheless emphasized the fact that he had notice of the conflicting descriptions in holding the attorney liable. Likewise, in Republic Oil Corp. v. Dan~iger,~~ attorney was retained to conduct a title search of property, and to discharge all encumbrances that were found. Before the closing of the sale the attorney discovered a perfected security interest in the property, but failed to either discharge it or disclose it to his client. The attorney stated that if his client had "known about the lien before the closing, 'it would have jeopardized the situation and not made it a workable situation.' "23 The appellate court affirmed the trial court's granting of sum- 18. Id. at 45 N.Y.S Gleason v. Title Guarantee Co., 300 F.2d 813 (5th Cir. 1962), reh'g denied, 317 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1963) S.W.2d 705 (Ky. 1971). 21. Id. at Mass. App. Ct. 858, 400 N.E.2d 1315 (1980). 23. Id. at 400 N.E. 2d 1317; see abo Palmer v. Nissen, 256 F. Supp. 497 (S.D. Me.
5 19881 Negligence in Title Examination 267 mary judgment against the attorney. In attempting to discover relevant matters worthy of disclosure in a title examination, the attorney also has the duty to in fact check the title, and cannot rely on what others may have told him. This is illustrated in Cleason v. Title Guarantee C~rnpany,~' where an attorney telephoned an abstract company and relied on the information he received in preparing a title certification. The attorney had neither checked the public records, nor had he examined a written abstract, and the title later proved to be defective. The court found the attorney negligent even though it was customary in the community to inquire by telephone about the state of title from an abstract company. The court went on to state that "[all1 customs are not good customs, and lawyers have no prescriptive right to make knowingly false statements in the name of custom."25 An additional example of this concept can be found in Wlodarek v. ThriftPz6 where a directed verdict in favor of an attorney was reversed when the court found that there may have been sufficient evidence to support allegations that the attorney was negligent in certifying title to property, which proved to be defective. The client alleged that the attorney did not make an actual title search, but instead merely relied on the word of the seller of the property in question. In reversing the lower court's verdict, the court stated that if the attorney had used reasonable care in searching the title, the defect would have been discovered. Therefore, when employed to examine title to property, the attorney not only has a duty to disclose relevant defects, but also to actually make a reasonable search for such defects. Reliance on others, such as an abstract company, may not suffice since it is the attorney's ultimate obligation to certify the title. 1V. DISCLOSURE IN OTHER AREAS Courts seem to be invoking a duty on attorneys to disclose knowledge of material facts not only in title cases, but others as well. In 1966) (Where the court, applying Maine law, found an attorney liable when he improperly described a boundary line in a purchase agreement for the sale of property. The attorney knew the boundary lines that were to be included in the sale, but by failing to properly describe the line, the amount of property to be sold was overstated resulting in a defect of title as to a part of the property purchased) F.2d 813 (5th Cir. 1962), reh'g denied, 317 F.2d 56 (5th Cir. 1963). 25. Id. at 300 F.2d Md. 453, 13 A.2d 774 (1940).
6 268 The Journal of the Legal Profession [Vol. 13:263 Spector v. Marrnel~tein,~~ an attorney represented his client in several loan transactions. The client loaned money to a corporation that was in extreme financial difficulty. The attorney had been present in meetings with the corporation officers and knew before the client made the loans that there was not enough income generated by the corporation to pay already existing debts. Furthermore, the attorney knew that the same security his client obtained for the loan was already secured by another previous loan made by a third party. The lawyer never informed his client about the likely possibility the loan would not be repaid, or of the improper security on which the loan rested. In finding the attorney negligent, the court explained that: A client is entitled to all the information helpful to his cause within his attorney's command. If an attorney negligently or willfully withholds from his client information material to the client's decision to pursue a given course of action, or to abstain therefrom, then the attorney is liable for the client's losses suffered as a result of action taken without benefit of the undisclosed material facts. Material facts are those which, if known to the client, might well have caused him, acting as a reasonable man, to alter his proposed course of It is interesting to observe that title insurance companies have also recently been held liable for negligence in failing to disclose defects when they begin to structure defects as an attorney or abstractor would. In the past, title insurance companies were generally not subject to negligence actions for failure to discover and disclose a defect in titie. This was because insurance companies were generally not employed to examine title, but only to indemnify against loss resulting from a defect.29 Today, however, title insurance companies have increasingly been undertaking the duties of both attorney and insurer. Many insurance companies issue title commitments which specify defects, and then also issue the policy indemnifying against loss from the defects listed.30 Some recent decisions have held that when these insurance companies schedule defects, they are undertaking the same duties F. Supp. 30 (S.D.N.Y. 1972), aff'd, 485 F.2d 474 (2nd Cir. 1972). 28. Id. at 361 F. Supp Stone v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 537 S.W.2d 55 (Tex. Civ. App. 1976), aff'din part, rev'd in part, 554 S.W.2d 183 (Tex. 1977); see also Anderson v. Title Ins. Co., 103 Idaho 875, 655 P.2d 82 (1982). 30. Shada v. Title & Trust Co. of Florida, 457 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984), petition for review denied, Title & Trust Co. of Florida v. Shada, 464 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 1985).
7 19881 Negligence in Title Examination 269 as attorneys and abstractors. Therefore, a duty of reasonable care will be imposed on the company, which if not exercised, will result in liability for negligen~e.~' V. CONCLUSION The duty that has been placed on attorneys is obviously strong when the attorney knows of a material fact but does not disclose it to his client. Yet with regard to title examination cases, the duty can be even stronger in that the attorney should exercise reasonable care and skill both in discovering those material facts, and in disclosing them to his client.32 Of course an attorney is not a guarantor of title,33 but as the above cases have indicated, the attorney is in effect guaranteeing that he has reasonably searched the title, and that all defects have been disclosed when he issues his certificate. If he has not taken such reasonable care he can be held liable. Unless there was contributory negligence,s4 or no reliance on the part of the client, the only two major defenses remaining for the attorney are that he disclosed the defect, or that the Statute of Limitations has run.35 Even a disclaimer will not protect the attorney when he has reasonable grounds to suspect the existence of a defect not disclosed in his opinion.36 Therefore, the best way for an attorney to avoid liability is to make a thorough search of the records, and disclose everything he finds of any materiality. Any less, and the attorney will be taking the risk of a possible malpractice action, a high risk in a litigious society. Robert S. Frost 31. Id. 32. Owen v. Neely, 471 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. 1971); St. Pius X House of Retreats v. Diocese of Camden, 88 N.J. 571, 443 A.2d 1052 (1982). 33. Byrnes v. Palmer, 18 A.D. 1, 45 N.Y.S. 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897), aff'd, 160 N.Y. 699, 55 N.E (N.Y. 1897); 7A C.J.S. Attorney and Client (1980). 34. See 59 A.L.R. 3D 1176, supra note 4; 29 AM. JUR. PROOF OF FACTS 1, supra note 1; see also United Leasing Corp. v. Miller, 60 N.C. App. 40, 298 S.E.2d 409 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982), review denied, 308 N.C. 194, 302 S.E.2d 248 (1983) (Where client was found to be contributively negligent having had notice of a deed of trust on property that was not disclosed in attorney's title search letter) A.L.R. 3D 1176, supra note 4, 29 AM. JUR. PROOF OF FACTS, supra note Owen v. Neely, 471 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. 1971).
5.51 LEGAL MALPRACTICE (Approved 6/79) CHARGE 5.51A Page 1 of 9 A. General Duty Owing An action brought against an attorney alleging negligence in the practice of law is referred to as a malpractice action.
MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS NORTHERN DISTRICT JOHN JONES Defendant-Appellant vs. No. ND-55867 JANE SMITH Plaintiff-Respondent. David Moore, for Appellant, and Stone C. Defense for Respondent. Before O BRIEN,
WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO? The Oregon Child Advocacy Project Professor Leslie J. Harris and Child Advocacy Fellows Colin Love-Geiger and Alyssa
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE CENTENNIAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, v. Plaintiff/Appellant, LAWYER S TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellee.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED November 19, 1996 A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS.
2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 02 day of October, 2007. Dale L. Somers UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Opinion Designated for Electronic Use, But Not for Print Publication IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
MORE THAN THEY BARGAINED FOR: ARE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANIES LIABLE IN TORT FOR UNDISCLOSED TITLE DEFECTS? James Bruce Davis * Title insurance has become the prevailing method by which real estate purchasers
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed April 3, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01365-CV UNITED MEDICAL SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., Appellant V. ANSELL HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS,
Case 4:14-cv-00283 Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 07/31/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SELDA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION H-14-283 WELLS FARGO
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 16, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00177-CV HENRY P. MASSEY AND ANN A. MASSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
2013 IL App (1st) 120546-U Third Division March 13, 2013 No. 1-12-0546 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
Agents E&O Standard of Care Project Survey Maryland To gain a deeper understanding of the differing agent duties and standard of care by state, the Big I Professional Liability Program and Swiss Re Corporate
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13 2114 For the Seventh Circuit BLYTHE HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. JOHN A. DEANGELIS, et al., Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 94-11035 (Summary Calendar) GLEN R. GURLEY and JEAN E. GURLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
Case 1:09-cv-21435-MGC Document 208 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2011 Page 1 of 6 E. JENNIFER NEWMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 09-21435-Civ-COOKE/TURNOFF vs. Plaintiff
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1362 James Joyce, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Armstrong Teasdale,
THE RIGHT TO INDEPENDENT COUNSEL Julie A. Shehane Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Telephone: 214-712 712-9546 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Julie.Shehane@cooperscully.com 2015 This
Chapter 9 The Georgia Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act A. OVERVIEW PURPOSE OF THE ACT The Brokerage Relationships in Real Estate Transactions Act (BRRETA) http://www.crowngeorgia.com/brreta.htm
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: JOSEPH R. O LONE, Case No.: 3:00-bk-5003-JAF Debtor. Chapter 7 / FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This case
Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice -----------------------------------------------------------------X NC TWO, L.P., as successor in interest
Case 06-57024 Doc 101 Filed 04/21/11 EOD 04/22/11 15:05:37 Pg 1 of 8 SO ORDERED: April 21, 2011. Basil H. Lorch III United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit WILLIAM MOSHER; LYNN MOSHER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 19, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk
Conflict of Interests When Representing a Beneficiary and the Trustee In the administration of a trust or estate, an attorney may be in the position of representing both the trustee and the beneficiaries
DISCOVERY IN BAD FAITH CASES Barbara A. O Brien A. The Tort of Bad Faith Bad faith is a separate tort from breach of contract. Anderson v. Continental Ins. Co., 85 Wis.2d 675, 686, 271 N.W.2d 368 (1978).
No. 05-11-00700-CV ACCEPTED 225EFJ016616444 FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 11 November 30 P8:40 Lisa Matz CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DALLAS, TEXAS WELLS FARGO BANK,
STANLEY V. MCCARVER: FORMAL DOCTOR- PATIENT RELATIONSHIP NOT REQUIRED FOR NEGLIGENCE LIABILITY Patrick I. Biggerstaff I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Nurse Christine Stanley submitted to a tuberculosis
Charge 4.41 Page 1 of 10 4.41 BAILMENT (Approved 6/72) NOTE TO JUDGE Recovery in bailment depends on proof of failure to exercise the requisite degree of care which proximately results in loss or damage
People v. Albright, No.03PDJ069. 10/29/03. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing at which Respondent did not appear, the Hearing Board disbarred Respondent, attorney registration number 14467,
Title Insurance Today, most persons holding interests in land rely upon title insurance as the primary means of title assurance Loan policy (insuring validity and priority of lender s mortgage lien) is
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion Filed July 28, 2015 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00894-CV TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellant V. JOSEPH MCRAE,
The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action
Health Insurance Companies Refund Requests and the Law Health care providers, such as doctors, hospitals, chiropractors, and others, receive most of their income in the form of payments from health insurance
Rolling the Dice: Insurer s Bad Faith Failure to Settle within Limits By: Attorney Jeffrey J Vita and Attorney Bethany DiMarzio Clearly the obligation to accept a good-faith settlement within the policy
THIS OPINION IS MERELY ADVISORY AND IS NOT BINDING ON THE INQUIRING ATTORNEY, OR THE COURTS OR ANY OTHER TRIBUNAL. DELAWARE STATE BAR ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS Opinion-1991-3 June 18,
ETHICAL ISSUES IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT Mark J. Oberti Oberti Sullivan LLP 723 Main Street, Suite 340 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 401-3556 firstname.lastname@example.org Edwin Sullivan Oberti Sullivan LLP 723 Main
Case: 14-10913 Date Filed: 12/15/2014 Page: 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-10913 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cv-01066-MSS-TBM GEICO GENERAL
THE TITLE GUARANTY: AN ATTRACTIVE IMPORT Nevin J. Kelly Bogudar Kordasiewicz Hogan & Hartson, LLP As nearly every investor in Poland knows, Poland s turbulent past can create considerable confusion over
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOT PRECEDENTIAL No. 06-3814 EMRETTA HINMAN; WILLIAM HINMAN, v. M.D. JOSEPH DELLO RUSSO; NEW JERSEY EYE CENTER; JOHN DOES 1-10; ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10
LEGAL MALPRACTICE AND THE CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY By Peter L. Ostermiller Occasionally, a defendant, while incarcerated and apparently having nothing better to do, will file a Motion under RCr. 11.42,
TRINITY V. COWAN: MENTAL ANGUISH IS NOT BODILY INJURY AND AN INTENTIONAL TORT IS NOT AN ACCIDENT By David Plaut Hanna & Plaut, L.L.P. Attorneys at Law 106 E. 6th Street, Suite 600 Austin, Texas 78701 Phone
Case: 11-20469 Document: 00511904997 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D June 29, 2012 Lyle
Supreme Court No. 2014-293-Appeal. (PB 12-5438) Bank of America, N.A. : v. : P.T.A. Realty, LLC, et al. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter.
Dischargeability Section (a((a Debt for business loan Gelco Const. Co. v. Plum, Adversary No. 0-01-fra Troy L. Plum, Case No. 0--fra /0/00 FRA Unpublished Debtor/Defendant obtained a loan in the amount
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BUDDY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED August 20, 1999 and NANCY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v JAMES K. FETT and MUTH & FETT, P.C., No. 207351 Washtenaw Circuit Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) CHARLES HONEYCUTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 02-2710 Ml/V ) FIRST FEDERAL BANK, a FSB d/b/a ) First Federal
LIABILITIES AND REMEDIES OF BOAT DEALERS, BROKERS AND REPAIRERS Prepared by Christopher Giaschi An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 1995 Industry Conference and Trade Show of the British
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00206-CV Bobby Hawthorne, Appellant v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Countrywide Insurance Services of Texas, Inc., Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT
GENERAL PRACTICE LEGAL MALPRACTICE IN LIGHT OF TOGSTAD LIABILITY FOR CURBSTONE OPINIONS? By Michael J. Hoover, DirectorFtn 1 Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility Reprinted from Bench
IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) CITY OF LINCOLN V. DIAL REALTY DEVELOPMENT NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION
Filed 10/9/96 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX VENTURA COUNTY NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff and Appellant, 2d Civil No. B094467
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
AN ANALYSIS OF MARYLAND LAW REGARDING AN INSURER S DUTY TO DEFEND INCLUDING AN ANALYSIS OF THE TYPES OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN AN INSURED AND THE INSURER THAT MAY REQUIRE THE INSURER TO ACCEPT AND
Page 1 of 7 809.66 MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE - HEALTH CARE PROVIDER'S LIABILITY FOR ACTS OF NON-EMPLOYEE AGENTS - RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR - APPARENT AGENCY. 1 NOTE WELL: This instruction previously was labeled N.C.P.I.
What Is A Title Insurance Policy? A title insurance policy is a policy of indemnity. The policy says that the insurer will indemnify the insured against loss if title to the property turns out to be anything
ISBA Advisory Opinion on Professional Conduct ISBA Advisory Opinions on Professional Conduct are prepared as an educational service to members of the ISBA. While the Opinions express the ISBA interpretation
Case 4:14-cv-01527 Document 39 Filed in TXSD on 07/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHARTIS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
Case 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9 WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAMES CZECH and WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Defendants. United States District Court
710.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE INTRODUCTION A contract of liability insurance contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Scroggins v. Allstate Ins. Co., 74 Ill.App.3d 1027, 1029; 393 N.E.2d
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. FABIO VERGARA, deceased, by the Administratrix of his Estate, Blanca Cardona,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 20, 2014 Session FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITIZENS BANK Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 13-6-185 Telford
Case 3:13-cv-00869-L Document 22 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 220 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADONIS ROBINSON AND TAMESHA ROBINSON, Plaintiffs,
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 12, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D12-2622 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10021 Fernando Montes
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-2045 MUNICH REINSURANCE AMERICA, INC. v. NOT PRECEDENTIAL AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant On Appeal from United States District
297 Ga. 313 FINAL COPY S14G1862. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P. v. WEDEREIT. MELTON, Justice. Brian Wedereit sued BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing ( BAC ) for, among
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0830 Arapahoe County District Court No. 08CV1981 Honorable Michael Spear, Judge Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 06-3601 J.E. Jones Construction Co.; The Jones Company Custom Homes, Inc., Now known as REJ Custom Homes, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Appeal from
The New ALTA Title Insurance Policies: Making the Leap from 1970 to the 21 st Century by Shannon J. Skinner Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP Shannon J. Skinner is a partner with the Seattle
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:01 CV 726 DDN VENETIAN TERRAZZO, INC., Defendant. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Pursuant
Case 1:12-cv-11280-DJC Document 35 Filed 08/27/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KAREN L. BACCHI, Individually and on Behalf of all Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
Filed 5/16/13; pub. order 6/12/13 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (El Dorado) ---- STEVE SCHAEFER, Plaintiff and Respondent, C068229 (Super.
The Fiduciary Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege and Its Application in Litigation by George O. Peterson I. INTRODUCTION Trusts and estates attorneys who represent fiduciaries may have little occasion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARYLAND ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. CCB-11-CV-00145 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs
MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION AND DRAFTING CONTINGENCY FEE AGREEMENTS ADVANCED PERSONAL INJURY LAW COURSE CLE TEXAS STATE BAR 2013 S AM J OHNSON S COTT, DOUGLASS & MC C ONNICO, L.L.P. A TTORNEYS A T L AW WWW.
BEWARE THE HIDDEN LAWYER By Fred A. Simpson and John R. Clayton 1 When your civil defendant-client lawsuit settles with plaintiff for $100,000, and your client is released from all plaintiff claims, that
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-27-2008 Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4856 Follow
Case 3:07-cv-01180-TEM Document 56 Filed 04/27/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION JAMES E. TOMLINSON and DARLENE TOMLINSON, his wife, v. Plaintiffs,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 26, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
NON-RESIDENTS PURCHASING REAL PROPERTY IN THE U.S. A. The Attorneys Role in the Purchase of Real Estate The purchase of real estate in the U.S. without the proper assistance can become a complex transaction.