IMPLEMENTING ARROWDEBREU EQUILIBRIA BY TRADING INFINITELYLIVED SECURITIES


 Marilynn Owen
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 IMPLEMENTING ARROWDEBREU EQUILIBRIA BY TRADING INFINITELYLIVED SECURITIES Kevin X.D. Huang and Jan Werner DECEMBER 2002 RWP Research Division Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Kevin X.D. Huang is a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Jan Werner is a professor of economics at the University of Minnesota. The authors acknowledge helpful discussions with Roko Aliprantis, Subir Chattopaydhyay, Steve LeRoy, Manuel Santos, and seminar participants at Brown University, University of Pennsylvania, NBER Workshop in General Equilibrium Theory, SITE 2000, and the 2000 World Congress of the Econometric Society. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System.
2 Abstract We show that ArrowDebreu equilibria with countably additive prices in infinitetime economy under uncertainty can be implemented by trading infinitelylived securities in complete sequential markets under two different portfolio feasibility constraints: wealth constraint, and essentially bounded portfolios. Sequential equilibria with no price bubbles implement ArrowDebreu equilibria, while those with price bubbles implement ArrowDebreu equilibria with transfers. Transfers are equal to price bubbles on initial portfolio holdings. Price bubbles arise in sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint if some securities are in zero supply or negative prices are permitted, but cannot arise with essentially bounded portfolios. JEL Classification Codes: D50, G12, E44. Keywords: ArrowDebreu equilibrium; security markets equilibrium; price bubbles; transfers.
3 1. Introduction Equilibrium models of dynamic competitive economies extending over infinite time play an important role in contemporary economic theory. The basic solution concept for such models is the ArrowDebreu (or Walrasian) equilibrium. In ArrowDebreu equilibrium it is assumed that agents simultaneously trade arbitrary consumption plans for the entire infinite and statecontingent future. In applied work, on the other hand, a different market structure and equilibrium concept are used: instead of trading arbitrary consumption plans at a single date, agents trade securities in sequential markets at every date in every event. The importance of ArrowDebreu equilibrium rests on the possibility of implementing equilibrium allocations by trading suitable securities in sequential markets. The idea of implementing an ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocation by trading securities takes its origin in the classical paper by Arrow [3]. Arrow proved that every ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocation in a twodate economy can be implemented by trading in complete security markets at the first date and spot commodity markets at every date in every event. The implementation is exact the sets of equilibrium allocations in the two market structures are exactly the same. Arrow s result can be easily extended to a multidate economy with finite timehorizon. Duffie and Huang [7] proved that ArrowDebreu equilibria can be implemented by trading securities in continuoustime finitehorizon economy. In this paper we study implementation of ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocations by sequential trading of infinitelylived securities in an infinitetime economy. Our results extend those of Kandori [11], from the setting of a representative consumer, and our previous results (Huang and Werner [10]), from the setting of no uncertainty and a single security, to the general setting of multiple consumers, multiple securities, and uncertainty. Wright [20] studied implementation in infinitetime economies with oneperiodlived securities. The crucial aspect of implementation in infinitetime security markets is the choice of feasibility constraints on agents portfolio strategies. A feasibility con 2
4 straint has to be imposed for otherwise agents would be able to borrow in security markets and roll over the debt without ever repaying it (Ponzi scheme). However, the constraint cannot be too tight for it could prevent agents from using portfolio strategies that generate wealth transfers necessary to achieve consumption plans of an ArrowDebreu equilibrium. Wright [20] employs the wealth constraint which says that a consumer cannot borrow more than the present value of her future endowments. He proved that exact implementation holds with oneperiodlived securities the set of ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocations and the set of equilibrium allocations in complete sequential markets are the same. The difficulty in extending implementation results to infinitelylived securities lies in the possibility of price bubbles in sequential markets. Kocherlakota [12], Magill and Quinzii [14], and Huang and Werner [10] pointed out that the wealth constraint gives rise to sequential equilibria with price bubbles on securities that are in zero supply. We demonstrate in this paper that, if one does not exclude negative security prices, then there exist sequential equilibria with price bubbles under the wealth constraint even if the supply of securities is strictly positive. We prove that ArrowDebreu equilibria with countably additive prices can be implemented by trading infinitelylived securities in complete sequential markets under the wealth constraint with no price bubbles. That is, the set of ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocations is the same as the set of equilibrium allocations in sequential markets with no price bubbles. Further, we show that sequential equilibria with nonzero price bubbles correspond to ArrowDebreu equilibria with transfers (and with countably additive prices). Transfers are equal to the value of price bubbles on agents initial portfolio holdings. Our results imply that there are always sequential equilibria with price bubbles under the wealth constraint if some of the securities are in zero supply or negative prices are permitted. This contradict the often asserted claim that price bubbles cannot arise when agents are infinitely lived (see, for example, Blanchard and Fischer [5] who attribute the claim to Tirole [19]). It is also in contrast to recent results of Montruccio and Privileggi [16] who show that price bubbles are a 3
5 marginal phenomenon in representative agent economies. Of course, examples of equilibrium price bubbles have been known before, but our results demonstrate their general existence with zero supply or negative prices. Santos and Woodford [18] proved that price bubbles cannot exist when all securities are in strictly positive supply and prices are positive. We consider an alternative portfolio feasibility constraint which requires that the value of borrowing at normalized security prices be bounded from below. We call portfolio strategies satisfying this constraint essentially bounded portfolio strategies. This feasibility constraint has a remarkable property that there cannot be price bubbles in sequential equilibrium regardless of the supply of the securities. We prove that exact implementation of ArrowDebreu equilibria with countably additive prices (without transfers) holds with essentially bounded portfolio strategies. It should be emphasized that ArrowDebreu equilibria that can be implemented by sequential trading of infinitelylived securities must have countably additive prices. It has been known since Bewley [4] that for some class of economies Arrow Debreu equilibrium prices may not be countably additive (for an example, see Huang and Werner [10]). Our results indicate that those equilibria cannot be implemented by sequential trading (except when the equilibrium allocation can also be supported by countable additive prices). The concept of ArrowDebreu equilibrium underlying our analysis is due to Peleg and Yaari [17]. Equilibrium prices assign finite values to consumption plans that are positive and do not exceed the aggregate endowment, but may or may not assign finite values to other consumption plans. The Peleg and Yaari approach should be contrasted with a more standard approach, first proposed by Debreu [6] (see also Bewley [4]), where the consumption space and the price space are a dual pair of topological vector spaces. Under this second approach, equilibrium prices assign finite values to all consumption plans in the consumption space. Sufficient conditions for the existence of PelegYaari equilibria with countably additive prices can be found in Peleg and Yaari [17]. Aliprantis, Brown and Burkinshaw [1, 2] 4
6 provide an analysis of PelegYaari equilibria in general consumption spaces. The paper is organized as follows: In section 2 we provide specification of time and uncertainty. In section 3 we introduce the notion of ArrowDebreu equilibrium and in section 4 we define a sequential equilibrium in security markets. We assume that there is a finite number of infinitelylived agents and a finite number of infinitelylived securities available for trade at every date. In sections 5 and 6 we state and prove our basic implementation results. In section 7 we present an example that illustrates our results. We conclude with a discussion of alternative portfolio constraints in section Time and Uncertainty Time is discrete with infinite horizon and indexed by t = 0, Uncertainty is described by a set S of states of the world and an increasing sequence of finite partitions {F t } t=0 of S. A state s S specifies a complete history of the environment from date 0 to the infinite future. The partition F t specifies sets of states that can be verified by the information available at date t. An element s t F t is called a datet event. We take F 0 = S so that there is no uncertainty at date 0. This description of the uncertain environment can be interpreted as an event tree. An event s t F t at date t identifies a node of the event tree. The unique date 0 event s 0 is the root node of the event tree. The set of all events at all dates is denoted by E. For each node s t there is a set of immediate successors and (with exception of the root node) a unique predecessor. The unique predecessor of s t is a date(t 1) event s t F t 1 such that s t s t. An immediate successor of s t is a date(t+1) event s t+1 such that s t+1 F t+1 and s t+1 s t. The set of all immediate successors of s t is denoted by F t+1 (s t ) and the number of immediate successors s t by κ(s t ). We assume that sup s t E κ(s t ) <, and denote that supremum by K. The set of all dateτ successor events of s t for τ > t, that is all dateτ events s τ F τ with s τ s t, is denoted by F τ (s t ). The set of successor events of s t at all dates after t is denoted by E + (s t ). We also write E(s t ) {s t } E + (s t ). 5
7 3. ArrowDebreu Equilibrium There is a single consumption good. A consumption plan is a scalarvalued process adapted to {F t } t=0. Consumption plans are restricted to lie in a linear space C of adapted processes. Our primary choice of the consumption space C is the space of all adapted processes (which can be identified with R ). The cone of nonnegative processes in C is denoted by C + ; a typical element of C is denoted by c = {c(s t )} s t E. There are I consumers. Each consumer i has the consumption set C +, a strictly increasing and complete preference i on C +, and an initial endowment ω i C +. The aggregate endowment ω i ωi is assumed positive, that is, ω 0. The standard notion of an ArrowDebreu general equilibrium is extended to our setting with infinitely many dates as follows: Prices are described by linear functional P which is positive and welldefined (i.e., finite valued) on each consumer s initial endowment. We call such functional a pricing functional. It follows that a pricing functional is welldefined on the aggregate endowment ω and, since it is positive, also on each attainable consumption plan, that is, on each c satisfying 0 c ω. It may or may not be welldefined on the entire space C. The price of one unit consumption in event s t under pricing functional P is p(s t ) P (e(s t )), where e(s t ) denotes the consumption plan equal to 1 in event s t at date t and zero in all other events and all other dates. A pricing functional P is countably additive if and only if P (c) = E p(st )c(s t ) for every c for which P (c) is welldefined. An ArrowDebreu equilibrium is a pricing functional P and a consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 such that c i maximizes consumer i s preference i subject to P (c) P (ω i ) and c C +, and markets clear, that is i ci = i ωi. An equilibrium pricing functional is normalized so that p(s 0 ) = 1. As noted in the introduction, this concept of ArrowDebreu equilibrium is due to Peleg and Yaari [17] who also provide sufficient conditions for the existence of an equilibrium with countably additive pricing functional when the consumption 6
8 space is C = R. The conditions are the standard monotonicity and convexity of preferences, as well as continuity of preferences in the product topology. We will also need the notion of an equilibrium with transfers. For given transfers {ɛ i } I i=1, where ɛ i R and i ɛi = 0, a pricing functional P (with p(s 0 ) = 1) and a consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 are an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers if c i maximizes consumer i s preference i subject to P (c) P (ω i )+ɛ i and c C +, and markets clear. Peleg and Yaari [17] conditions also imply that an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers exists for small transfers. 4. Sequential Equilibrium and Price Bubbles We consider J infinitelylived securities traded at every date. We assume that the number of securities is greater than or equal to the number of immediate successors of every event, that is, J K. Each security j is specified by a dividend process d j which is adapted to {F t } t=0 and nonnegative. The exdividend price of security j in event s t is denoted by q j (s t ), and q j is the price process of security j. Portfolio strategy θ specifies a portfolio of J securities θ(s t ) held after trade in each event s t. The payoff of portfolio strategy θ in event s t for t 1 at a price process q is z(q, θ)(s t ) [q(s t ) + d(s t )]θ(s t ) q(s t )θ(s t ). (1) Each consumer i has an initial portfolio α i R J at date 0. The dividend stream α i d on initial portfolio constitutes one part of consumer i s endowment. The rest is y i C and becomes available to the consumer at each date in every event. Thus, it holds ω i (s t ) = y i (s t ) + α i d(s t ) s t. (2) The supply of securities is ᾱ = i αi, and the adjusted aggregate endowment of goods is ȳ = i yi. We assume that ᾱ 0. Consumers face feasibility constraints when choosing their portfolio strategies. Such constraints are necessary to prevent consumers from using Ponzi schemes. In the definition of sequential equilibrium the set of feasible portfolio strategies of 7
9 consumer i is Θ i. Specific feasibility constraints will be introduced in sections 5 and 6. A sequential equilibrium is a price process q and consumptionportfolio allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 such that: (i) for each i, consumption plan c i and portfolio strategy θ i maximize i subject to c(s 0 ) + q(s 0 )θ(s 0 ) y i (s 0 ) + q(s 0 )α i, c(s t ) y i (s t ) + z(q, θ)(s t ) s t s 0, c C +, θ Θ i ; (ii) markets clear, that is c i (s t ) = ȳ(s t ) + ᾱd(s t ), i θ i (s t ) = ᾱ, i s t Security price process q is oneperiod arbitrage free in event s t if there does not exist a portfolio θ(s t ) such that [q(s t+1 )+d(s t+1 )]θ(s t ) 0 for every s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) and q(s t )θ(s t ) 0, with at least one strict inequality. 1 It is well known that if q is arbitrage free in every event, then there exist a sequence of strictly positive numbers {π q (s t )} s t E with π q (s 0 ) = 1 such that π q (s t )q j (s t ) = s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) π q (s t+1 ) [ q j (s t+1 ) + d j (s t+1 ) ] s t, j. (3) We call such π q a system of event prices associated with q. Security markets are oneperiod complete in event s t at prices q if the oneperiod payoff matrix [q(s t+1 )+d(s t+1 )] s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) has rank equal to κ(s t ). Security markets are complete at q if they are oneperiod complete at every event. Of course, the assumed condition that J K is necessary for markets to be complete. 1 Note that oneperiod arbitrage is defined without any reference to the portfolio feasibility constraint. Of the two constraints considered in this paper, the constraint of essentially bounded strategies (Section 6) does not restrict portfolio holdings in any single event while the wealth constraint (Section 5) does. Yet, it remains true that there cannot be a oneperiod arbitrage in sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint (see Santos and Woodford [18]). 8
10 If markets are complete at q, then for each event s t there exists a portfolio strategy that has payoff equal to one at s t, zero in every other event and involves no portfolio holding after date t. If q is oneperiod arbitrage free, then the date0 price of that portfolio strategy is π q (s t ) which justifies the term event price. Suppose that security prices q are oneperiod arbitrage free and that markets are complete at q. Then the present value of security j at s t can be defined using event prices as 1 π q (s t ) s τ E + (s t ) π q (s τ )d j (s τ ). (4) If the price of security j is nonnegative in every event, then the sum (4) is finite for every s t. To see this, we use (3) recursively to obtain q j (s t ) = T τ=t+1 s τ F τ (s t ) π q (s τ ) π q (s t ) d j(s τ ) + s T F T (s t ) for each s t, and for any T > t. If q j (s t ) 0, then (5) implies that q j (s t ) 1 π q (s t ) T τ=t+1 s τ F τ (s t ) π q (s T ) π q (s t ) q j(s T ) (5) π q (s τ )d j (s τ ) (6) for every s t and T > t. Taking the limit on the right hand side of (6) as T goes to infinity and using d j (s τ ) 0, we obtain that the present value (4) is less than or equal to the price of the security. We do not exclude the possibility of security prices being negative. Absence of oneperiod arbitrage does not imply that security prices are nonnegative even if dividends are nonnegative. 2 A way to exclude negative security prices is to assume free disposal of securities (see Santos and Woodford [18]). 3 If the present value of a security is finite, then the difference between the price and the present value is the price bubble on that security. We denote the price 2 We show later in the paper that negative security prices are possible in sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint but not with essentially bounded portfolio strategies. 3 The assumption of free disposal is prohibitively restrictive for many securities. For example, futures markets would not exist if futures contracts could be freely disposed. 9
11 bubble (associated with q) on security j in event s t by σ qj (s t ). That is σ qj (s t ) q j (s t ) 1 π π q (s t q (s τ )d j (s τ ). (7) ) s τ E + (s t ) Note that if the price of security j is nonnegative in every event, then 0 σ qj (s t ) q j (s t ) for every s t. Also, if the present value of security j is finite and σ qj (s t ) 0 for every s t, then q j (s t ) 0 for every s t. For use later, we note that (5) and (7) imply that σ qj (s t ) = 1 π π q (s t q (s t+1 )σ qj (s t+1 ), (8) ) and also that for each s t. s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) σ qj (s t 1 ) = lim π T π q (s t q (s T )q j (s T ). (9) ) s T F T Whether nonzero price bubbles can exist in a sequential equilibrium depends crucially on the form of portfolio feasibility constraints (see Huang and Werner [10]). Under the wealth constraint (Section 5) nonzero equilibrium price bubbles are possible but they are not possible under the constraint of essentially bounded portfolio strategies (Section 6). 5. Implementation with the Wealth Constraint. A frequently used portfolio feasibility constraint is the wealth constraint. It applies to complete security markets where event prices can be uniquely defined. 4 It prohibits a consumer from borrowing more than the present value of his future endowment. Formally, portfolio strategy θ satisfies the wealth constraint if q(s t )θ(s t ) 1 π π q (s t q (s τ )y i (s τ ) s t, (10) ) s τ E + (s t ) where π q is the event price system (assumed unique) associated with q. We refer to a sequential equilibrium in which every consumer s set of feasible portfolio strategies is defined by (10) as a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. 4 Santos and Woodford [18] extend the wealth constraint to incomplete markets. 10
12 We begin with two theorems that establish equivalence between countably additive ArrowDebreu equilibria and sequential equilibria with no price bubbles. All proofs have been relegated to the Appendix. Theorem 5.1. Let consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and pricing functional P be an ArrowDebreu equilibrium. If P is countably additive, P (d j ) < for each j, and security markets are complete at prices q given by q j (s t ) = 1 p(s τ )d p(s t j (s τ ), s t, j, (11) ) s τ E + (s t ) then there exists a portfolio allocation {θ i } I i=1 such that q and the allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 are a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. Theorem 5.1 says that an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with countably additive pricing can be implemented by sequential trading under the wealth constraint provided that security markets are complete at prices defined by the present value of future dividends (and thus with no price bubbles). The assumed condition that there are more securities than immediate successors of every event (J K) is necessary for market completeness. The implementation of countably additive ArrowDebreu equilibria by sequential trading with no price bubbles is exact. Theorem 5.2 Let security prices q and consumptionportfolio allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 be a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. If security markets are complete at q and price bubbles are zero, i.e., σ q = 0, then consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and the pricing functional P given by P (c) = π q (s t )c(s t ) (12) s t E are an ArrowDebreu equilibrium. Our next results show that, in general, there exist sequential equilibria under the wealth constraint with nonzero price bubbles, and that they correspond to countably additive ArrowDebreu equilibria with transfers. 11
13 Theorem 5.3. Let consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and pricing functional P be an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers {ɛ i } I i=1 such that ɛ i = ρ(s 0 )α i for some ρ(s 0 ) R J with ρ(s 0 )ᾱ = 0. If P is countably additive, P (d j ) < for each j, and security markets are complete at prices q given by q j (s t ) = 1 p(s t ) s τ E + (s t ) where ρ(s t ) R J satisfies ρ(s t )ᾱ = 0 for every s t and ρ j (s t ) = 1 p(s t ) s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) p(s τ )d j (s τ ) + ρ j (s t ), s t, j, (13) p(s t+1 )ρ j (s t+1 ), s t, j, (14) then there exists a portfolio allocation {θ i } I i=1 such that q and allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 are a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. Theorem 5.3 says that every ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocation with transfers that are proportional to initial portfolios and with countably additive pricing can be implemented by sequential trading under the wealth constraint, provided that security markets are complete. Proportionality of transfers to initial portfolios, i.e., ɛ i = ρ(s 0 )α i for some ρ(s 0 ), implies that a consumer whose initial portfolio is zero, must have zero transfer. If all consumers have zero initial portfolios, then only ArrowDebreu equilibrium without transfers can be implemented in sequential markets. Security prices in Theorem 5.3 have price bubbles equal to ρ. There is considerable freedom in choosing price bubbles in the construction of prices (13). The only constraints on ρ are the martingale property (14) and the condition of zero bubble on the supply of securities. This freedom in choosing price bubbles can be used to assure that security markets are complete at prices (13) (see the example of Section 7). If one is willing to restrict attention to positive security prices and therefore to positive price bubbles, the scope of Theorem 5.3 is restricted as ρ has to be positive. With ρ positive condition ρ(s 0 )ᾱ = 0 implies that ρ j (s 0 ) = 0 for every 12
14 security j with ᾱ j > 0. Then (14) implies that ρ j (s t ) = 0 for such j, for every s t. Thus, there cannot be positive price bubbles in sequential equilibrium on a security with strictly positive supply. This has been demonstrated by Santos and Woodford [18]. If all securities are in strictly positive supply, then only Arrow Debreu equilibrium without transfers can be implemented in sequential markets with positive prices. The implementation of countably additive ArrowDebreu equilibria with transfers is exact. Theorem 5.4. Let security prices q and consumptionportfolio allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 be a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. If security markets are complete at q and s t E π q(s t )d j (s t ) < for each j, then consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and the pricing functional P given by P (c) = π q (s t )c(s t ) (15) s t E are an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers {σ q (s 0 )α i } I i=1. It holds σ q (s 0 )ᾱ = 0. We emphasize that ArrowDebreu equilibria (with or without transfers) that can be implemented in sequential markets under the wealth constraint have countably additive pricing. There are economies in which ArrowDebreu equilibrium pricing functional is not countably additive (see Huang and Werner [10]). These equilibria cannot be implemented in sequential markets under the wealth constraint. 6. Implementation with Essentially Bounded Portfolios. We propose in this section a portfolio feasibility constraint under which only ArrowDebreu equilibria without transfers can be implemented in sequential markets and price bubbles cannot arise. Portfolio strategy θ is bounded from below if inf θ j(s t ) > (16) s t,j 13
15 Portfolio strategy θ is essentially bounded from below at q if there exists a bounded from below portfolio strategy b such that q(s t )θ(s t ) q(s t )b(s t ) s t. (17) We refer to a (essentially) bounded from below portfolio strategies simply as (essentially) bounded portfolio strategy. Of course, every bounded portfolio strategy is essentially bounded but the converse is not true (unless there is a single security). The set of essentially bounded portfolio strategies is a convex cone. If security price vector q(s t ) is positive and nonzero for every event s t, then portfolio strategy θ is essentially bounded if and only if inf s t q(s t )θ(s t ) >, (18) where q(s t ) q(s t )/ j q j(s t ) is the normalized security price vector. 5 We refer to sequential equilibrium in which each consumer s set of feasible portfolios is the set of essentially bounded portfolio strategies (17) as a sequential equilibrium with essentially bounded portfolios. It is crucial for the results in this section that the portfolio feasibility constraint is stated in the form (17). Neither the bounded borrowing constraint inf s t q(s t )θ(s t ) >, nor (16) deliver the same results. Only if there is a single security, (17) and (16) are equivalent, and in that sense the results of this section extend Theorem 9.1 in Huang and Werner [10]. Before presenting the implementation results we prove that there cannot be a nonzero price bubble in sequential equilibrium with essentially bounded portfolios. All proofs in this section have been relegated to the Appendix. Theorem 6.1. If q is a sequential equilibrium price process with essentially bounded portfolios and if security markets are complete at q, then q(s t ) 0 and σ q (s t ) = 0 for every s t. 5 If θ satisfies (17) and q 0, then q(s t )θ(s t ) [ j q j(s t )]b, where b = inf s t,j b j (s t ). Hence q(s t )θ(s t ) is bounded below. Conversely, if θ satisfies (18), then q(s t )θ(s t ) B for some B R. With b j (s t ) = B for each j and s t, θ satisfies (17). 14
16 That the price of each security has to be positive follows from the fact that a portfolio strategy of shortselling the security and never buying it back is bounded. If the price were negative, then each consumer could shortsell the security (and do so at an arbitrary scale) and make an arbitrage profit. This is incompatible with an equilibrium. A similar arbitrage argument implies that price bubbles are zero. For each security there is an essentially bounded portfolio strategy with initial investment equal to the negative of the price bubble and zero payoff in every future event. If the price bubble were positive (it cannot be negative as shown in Section 4) each consumer could make an arbitrage profit of arbitrary scale. A detailed proof can be found in the Appendix. The following two theorems demonstrate that countably additive ArrowDebreu equilibria (without transfers) can be implemented by sequential trading with essentially bounded portfolios in exact fashion. Theorem 6.2. Let consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and pricing functional P be an ArrowDebreu equilibrium. If P is countably additive, P (d j ) < for each j, security markets are complete at prices q given by q j (s t ) = 1 p(s τ )d p(s t j (s τ ), s t, j, (19) ) s τ E + (s t ) and there exists an essentially bounded portfolio strategy η such that 1 p(s τ )ȳ(s t ) q(s t )η(s t ), s t, (20) p(s t ) s τ E + (s t ) then there exists a portfolio allocation {θ i } I i=1 such that q and the allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 are a sequential equilibrium with essentially bounded portfolios. Condition (20) says that it is feasible to borrow an amount greater than or equal to the present value of aggregate future endowment using an essentially bounded portfolio strategy. Equivalently, it is feasible for each consumer to borrow the present value of his endowment using an essentially bounded portfolio strategy. Under condition (20), the set of all essentially bounded portfolio strategies includes all strategies satisfying the wealth constraint. 15
17 Theorem 6.3. Let security prices q and consumptionportfolio allocation {c i, θ i } I i=1 be a sequential equilibrium with essentially bounded portfolios. If security markets are complete at q and there exists an essentially bounded portfolio strategy η such that 1 π q (s t ) s τ E + (s t ) π q (s τ )ȳ(s t ) q(s t )η(s t ), s t, (21) then consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 and pricing functional P given by P (c) = s t E π q (s t )c(s t ) (22) are an ArrowDebreu equilibrium. One can show that for condition (21) or (20) to hold it is sufficient that there exists a bounded from above and from below portfolio strategy b such that ȳ(s t ) z(q, b)(s t ) for all s t. For this latter condition, it is sufficient that ȳ is bounded relative to d, that is, that ȳ(s t ) γd(s t ) for some γ R J, for all s t. 7. Example. We consider an infinitetime binomial eventtree. Event s t at date t has two immediate successors (s t, up) and (s t, down) at date t + 1. Probabilities of events are specified by conditional probabilities µ(up s t ) = µ(down s t ) = 1. 2 There are two consumers with expected utility functions u i (c) = β t E[ln(c t )], (23) t=0 for i = 1, 2, where expectation is taken with respect to µ, and 0 < β < 1. Their endowments are ω 1 (s t, up) = A, ω 1 (s t, down) = B, (24) and ω 2 (s t, up) = B, ω 2 (s t, down) = A, (25) 16
18 for each s t with t 0, and ω 1 (s 0 ) = ω 2 (s 0 ) = A + B. (26) 2 The aggregate endowment is A + B riskfree, and constant over time. The unique ArrowDebreu equilibrium consists of allocation {c 1, c 2 } given by c 1 (s t ) = c 2 (s t ) = A + B, s t, (27) 2 supported by a countably additive pricing functional P given by p(s t ) = β t µ(s t ). (28) Next, we consider security markets with two infinitelylived securities. Security 1 has riskfree dividends given by Security 2 has statedependent dividends given by d 1 (s t ) = 1 s t, t 1. (29) d 2 (s t, up) = u, d 2 (s t, down) = d, (30) for each s t with t 0. We assume that u > d. Initial portfolios are α 1 = (1, 1) and α 2 = ( 1, 0). Adjusted goods endowments are y 1 = ω 1 d 1 d 2 and y 2 = ω 2 + d 1. Theorem 5.1 says that the ArrowDebreu equilibrium consumption allocation (27) can be implemented as a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint. Equilibrium security prices obtain from (11) and are q 1 (s t ) = β τ = τ=1 β 1 β (31) and q 2 (s t ) = u + d 2 τ=1 β τ = u + d 2 β 1 β, (32) for every s t. At these prices security markets are complete. Further, there are no price bubbles. 17
19 For small enough transfers ɛ 1, ɛ 2 (with ɛ 1 + ɛ 2 = 0), there is an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers. It consists of consumption allocation c 1 (s t ) = A + B 2 + ɛ 1 (1 β), s t, (33) and c 2 (s t ) = A + B 2 + ɛ 2 (1 β), s t, (34) supported by the countably additive pricing functional P given by (28). Theorem 5.3 implies that consumption allocation (3334) of the ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers can be implemented as a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint, provided that transfers are proportional to initial portfolios. Transfers ɛ 1 and ɛ 2 have to satisfy ɛ 1 = ρ(s 0 )α 1 and ɛ 2 = ρ(s 0 )α 2 for some ρ(s 0 ) = (ρ 1 (s 0 ), ρ 2 (s 0 )) R 2 with ρ(s 0 )ᾱ = 0. Since ᾱ = (0, 1), this implies ρ 2 (s 0 ) = 0, ɛ 1 = ρ 1 (s 0 ) and ɛ 2 = ρ 1 (s 0 ), with no restriction on ρ 1 (s 0 ), and therefore no restriction (beyond ɛ 1 +ɛ 2 = 0) on transfers. Thus every ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers can be implemented. Equilibrium security prices can be obtained from (13). They are q 1 (s t ) = β τ + ρ 1 (s t ) = τ=1 β 1 β + ρ 1(s t ), (35) and q 2 (s t ) = u + d 2 τ=1 β τ + ρ 2 (s t ) = u + d 2 where ρ(s t ) = (ρ 1 (s t ), ρ 2 (s t )) is chosen for each s t so as to satisfy β 1 β + ρ 2(s t ), (36) ρ(s 0 ) = (ɛ 1, 0) (37) ρ(s t ) = β[ 1 2 ρ(st, up) ρ(st, down)]. (38) Further, the sequence of price bubbles ρ has to be selected so that security markets are complete at prices q. Markets are complete whenever the oneperiod 2by2 payoff matrix [ q(s t+1 ) + d(s t+1 )] s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) has full rank for every s t. If we restrict price bubbles to be positive, then necessarily ρ 2 (s t ) = 0 for every s t so that there 18
20 can be positive price bubbles only on zerosupply security 1. We recall that negative price bubbles lead eventually to negative security prices in some events. The results of Section 6 imply that only the ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocation (27) can be implemented as sequential equilibrium with essentially bounded portfolios. Equilibrium security prices are those of (3132). ArrowDebreu equilibrium allocations with transfers (3334) cannot be implemented. In particular, security prices (3536) are not equilibrium prices with essentially bounded portfolios since they permit arbitrage opportunities (see Theorem 6.1 and the discussion thereafter). 8. Other Portfolio Constraints. An often used feasibility constraint on portfolio strategies is the transversality condition. In our setting the transversality condition is written as lim inf T s T F T (s t ) π q (s T )q(s T )θ(s T ) 0 s t. (39) Hernandez and Santos [9] proved that consumers budget sets in sequential markets are the same under the wealth constraint and the transversality condition, as long as s t E π q(s t )y i (s t ) <. Therefore, all implementation results of Section 5 remain valid when the wealth constraint is replaced by the transversality condition (and under an additional assumption that s t E π q(s t )ȳ(s t ) < ). Hernandez and Santos [9] and Magill and Quinzii [15] provide other specifications of portfolio constraints that lead to the same budget sets as the wealth constraint. For further discussion of equivalent portfolio constraints in the setting with oneperiodlived securities, see Florenzano and Gourdel [8], Magill and Quinzii [15], and Levine and Zame [13]. 19
21 Appendix. We start by proving a lemma concerning relation between budget sets in sequential markets under the wealth constraint and in ArrowDebreu markets. We recall that π q and σ q denote the systems of event prices and price bubbles (respectively) associated with given security prices q. Further, p denotes the system of event prices associated with given pricing functional P. Let B w (q; y i, α i ) denote the set of budget feasible consumption plans in sequential markets at prices q under the wealth constraint, when goods endowment is y i and initial portfolio is α i. That is, c B w (q; y i, α i ) if c C + and there exists a portfolio strategy θ such that c(s 0 ) + q(s 0 )θ(s 0 ) y i (s 0 ) + q(s 0 )α i, c(s t ) y i (s t ) + z(q, θ)(s t ) s t s 0, (40) q(s t )θ(s t ) 1 π π q (s t q (s τ )y i (s τ ) s t. ) s τ E + (s t ) Let B AD (P ; ω i, ɛ i ) denote the set of budget feasible consumption plans in Arrow Debreu markets at P when endowment is ω i and transfer is ɛ i. That is, c B AD (P ; ω i, ɛ i ) if c C + and P (c) P (ω i ) + ɛ i. (41) The budget set with zero transfer B AD (P ; ω i, 0) is denoted by B AD (P ; ω i ). is, Throughout the Appendix, endowments ω i, y i and α i are related by (2), that ω i (s t ) = y i (s t ) + α i d(s t ) s t. (42) Lemma A.1. Let P be a countably additive pricing functional and q a marketcompleting system of security prices. If π q (s t ) = p(s t ) s t, (43) 20
22 and P (y i ) <, P (d j ) < for each i and j, then B w (q; y i, α i ) = B AD (P ; ω i, α i σ q (s 0 )) (44) Proof: Suppose that c B w (q; y i, α i ). Multiplying both sides of the budget constraint (40) at s t by π q (s t ) and summing over all s t for t ranging from 0 to arbitrary τ, and using (3), we obtain τ π q (s t )c(s t )+ π q (s τ )q(s τ )θ(s τ ) π q (s t )y i (s t )+q(s 0 )α i. (45) t=0 s t F t s τ F τ t=0 s t F t Adding t=τ+1 s t F t π q (s t )y i (s t ) to both sides of (45), there results τ π q (s t )c(s t ) + π q (s τ )q(s τ )θ(s τ ) + π q (s t )y i (s t ) t=0 s t F t s τ F τ τ s t E + (s τ ) s t E π q (s t )y i (s t ) + q(s 0 )α i. (46) The sum s t E π q(s t )y i (s t ) is finite by assumption. If the use is made of the wealth constraint, (46) implies that τ π q (s t )c(s t ) π q (s t )y i (s t ) + q(s 0 )α i (47) s t F t t=0 s t E Taking limits in (47) as τ goes to infinity yields π q (s t )c(s t ) π q (s t )y i (s t ) + q(s 0 )α i. (48) s t E s t E Since s t E π q(s t )d j (s t ) is assumed finite for every j, the price bubble σ q (s 0 ) is welldefined. If the use is made of (7) and (42), inequality (48) can be written as π q (s t )c(s t ) π q (s t )ω i (s t ) + α i σ q (s 0 ), (49) s t E s t E or simply as P (c) P (ω i ) + α i σ q (s 0 ). (50) 21
23 Thus c B AD (P ; ω i, α i σ q (s 0 )). Suppose now that c B AD (P ; ω i, α i σ q (s 0 )). Since security markets are complete at q, for each s t there exists portfolio θ(s t ) such that [q(s t+1 ) + d(s t+1 )]θ(s t ) = s τ E(s t+1 ) π q (s τ ) π q (s t+1 ) [c(sτ ) y i (s τ )] s t+1 F t+1 (s t ). Note that the sum on the righthand side of (51) is finite since s τ E(s t+1 ) π q(s τ )c(s τ ) P (c). Multiplying both sides of (51) by π q (s t+1 ), summing over all s t+1 F t+1 (s t ), and using (3), we obtain q(s t )θ(s t ) = s τ E + (s t ) It follows from (51) and (52) that (51) π q (s τ ) π q (s t ) [c(sτ ) y i (s τ )] s t. (52) c(s t ) + q(s t )θ(s t ) = y i (s t ) + [q(s t ) + d(s t )]θ(s t ) s t s 0. (53) Thus c and θ satisfy the sequential budget constraint (40) at each s t s 0. To show that the budget constraint at s 0 also holds we use the equivalence of (50) and (48). Equation (52) for s 0 and (48) imply the date0 budget constraint c(s 0 ) + q(s 0 )θ(s 0 ) y i (s 0 ) + q(s 0 )α i. (54) Since c 0, equation (52) implies that θ satisfies the wealth constraint. Thus c B w (q; y i, α i ) Proof of Theorem 5.1: For the system of security prices q defined by (11), the associated event prices π q satisfy (43) and price bubbles σ q are zero. Since P (ω i ) < and P (d j ) <, it follows that P (y i ) <. Therefore, Lemma A.1 implies that the budget set in sequential markets at q equals the ArrowDebreu budget set with zero transfer. Hence, consumption plan c i is optimal for each i in sequential markets. It remains to be shown that portfolio strategies that generate the optimal consumption plans clear security markets. 22
24 Let θ i be portfolio strategy defined by (51) with c i, that is, satisfying [q(s t+1 ) + d(s t+1 )]θ i (s t ) = s τ E(s t+1 ) p(s τ ) p(s t+1 ) [ci (s τ ) y i (s τ )] s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) for each s t and each i. Such portfolio strategy generates consumption plan c i and satisfies i s the wealth constraint. Summing (55) over all i and using i ci = i ωi and (42), we obtain [q(s t ) + d(s t )] i θ i (s t ) = s τ E(s t ) (55) p(s τ ) p(s t ) d(sτ )ᾱ s t s 0. (56) It follows from (11) and (56) that [ ] [q(s t ) + d(s t )] θ i (s t ) ᾱ = 0 s t s 0. (57) i If there are no securities with redundant oneperiod payoffs, then (57) implies that θ i (s t ) = ᾱ s t. (58) i Otherwise, if there are redundant securities, then portfolio strategies {θ i } can be modified without changing their payoffs so that (58) holds. Proof of Theorem 5.2: In a sequential equilibrium under the wealth constraint, 1 the present value π q (s t ) s τ E + (s t ) π q(s τ )y i (s τ ) must be finite, for otherwise there would not exist an optimal portfolio strategy for consumer i. Therefore P (y i ) <. Further, since price bubbles are zero, it follows that P (d j ) < (see Section 4). Lamma A.1 can be applied and it implies the conclusion. Proof of Theorem 5.3: If security prices q defined by (13) are market completing, then the associated system of event prices π q is unique and satisfies (43). The associated price bubbles are σ q = ρ. As in the proof of Theorem 5.1, one can show that P (y i ) <. It follows from Lemma A.1 that each consumption plan c i is optimal in sequential markets. 23
25 The proof that portfolio strategies that generate the optimal consumption plans also clear security markets is the same as in Theorem 5.1 with one minor modification. With security prices defined by (13), we obtain the following equation instead of (57): [ ] [q(s t ) + d(s t )] i θ i (s t ) ᾱ = ρ(s t )ᾱ s t s 0. (59) However, since ρ(s t )ᾱ = 0, equation (57) does hold and the rest of the proof of Theorem 5.1 applies. Proof of Theorem 5.4: The same argument as in the proof of Theorem 5.2 implies that P (y i ) <. It follows immediately from Lemma A.1 that pricing functional P and consumption allocation {c i } I i=1 are an ArrowDebreu equilibrium with transfers {σ q (s 0 )α i } I i=1. That these transfers add up to zero (or, equivalently, price bubble on the supply of securities is zero) follows from Walras Law P (c i ) = P (ω i ) + σ q (s 0 )ᾱ (60) i i and marketclearing i ci = i ωi. Proof of Theorem 6.1: We first show that q 0. Suppose, by contradiction, that q j (s t ) < 0 for some security j and event s t. Let c i be equilibrium consumption plan and θ i equilibrium portfolio strategy of consumer i. Consider a portfolio strategy ˆθ i that results from holding θ i and purchasing one share of security j in event s t and holding it forever. Since θ i is essentially bounded, ˆθ i is essentially bounded, too. Further, since q j (s t ) < 0 and d j 0, portfolio strategy ˆθ i generates a consumption plan that is greater than or equal to c i in every event and strictly greater in event s t. This contradicts the optimality of c i. We can now assume that q 0. It follows from the discussion in Section 4 that the present value (4) of each security is finite and the price bubble is welldefined and nonnegative in every event. To prove that σ q (s t ) = 0 for every t it suffices to show that σ q (s 0 ) = 0. The rest follows from (8). 24
26 Since security markets are complete at q, for each event s t and each security j there exists a portfolio ξ j (s t ) such that [q(s t+1 ) + d(s t+1 )]ξ j (s t ) = s τ E(s t+1 ) π q (s τ ) π q (s t+1 ) d j(s τ ) s t+1 F t+1 (s t ). (61) Multiplying both sides of (61) by π q (s t+1 ), summing over all s t+1 F t+1 (s t ) and using (3) we obtain q(s t )ξ j (s t ) = s τ E + (s t ) π q (s τ ) π q (s τ ) d j(s τ ). (62) Since d j 0, it follows that q(s t )ξ j (s t ) 0. Therefore ξ j is essentially bounded. Using (61) and (62), we obtain [q(s t ) + d(s t )]ξ j (s t ) q(s t )ξ j (s t ) = d j (s t ) s t s 0, (63) Thus, the payoff of ξ j equals the dividend d j, that is z(q, ξ j ) = d j. Date0 price of ξ j is the present value of d j (see (62)). Let η j denote a portfolio strategy of selling one share of security j at date 0 and never buying it back. We have z(q, ξ j + η j )(s t ) = 0 s t s 0. (64) and q(s 0 )[ξ j (s 0 ) + η j (s 0 )] = σ qj (s 0 ). (65) Consider portfolio strategy ˆθ i = θ i + ξ j + η j. Since strategies θ i, ξ j and η j are essentially bounded, ˆθ i is essentially bounded, too. If σ qj (s 0 ) > 0, then ˆθ i generates a consumption plan that is strictly greater than c i at date 0 and equal to c i in all future events. This would contradict optimality of c i. Therefore σ qj (s 0 ) = 0. Before proving Theorems 6.2 and 6.3 we establish a lemma concerning relation between budget sets in sequential markets with essentially bounded portfolio strategies and in ArrowDebreu markets. Let B b (q; y i, α i ) denote the set of budget feasible consumption plans in sequential markets at prices q with essentially bounded portfolio strategies, when goods 25
27 endowment is y i and initial portfolio is α i. That is, c B b (q; y i, α i ) if c C + and there exists an essentially bounded portfolio strategy θ such that We have c(s 0 ) + q(s 0 )θ(s 0 ) y i (s 0 ) + q(s 0 )α i, c(s t ) y i (s t ) + z(q, θ)(s t ) s t s 0,. (66) Lemma A.2. Let P be a countably additive pricing functional and q 0 a marketcompleting system of security prices with zero price bubbles, i.e., σ q = 0. If π q (s t ) = p(s t ) s t, (67) and there exists an essentially bounded portfolio strategy η such that 1 π q (s t ) s τ E + (s t ) π q (s τ )y i (s t ) q(s t )η(s t ), s t, (68) then B b (q; y i, α i ) = B AD (P ; ω i ) (69) Proof: Let c B b (q; y i, α i ). As in the proof of Lemma A.1, budget constraint (66) implies (45). Taking limits in (45) as τ goes to infinity, we obtain s t E π q (s t )c(s t ) + lim inf τ Note that (68) for s 0 implies that π q (s τ )q(s τ )θ(s τ ) π q (s t )y i (s t ) + q(s 0 )α i. (70) s τ F τ s t E π q (s t )y i (s t ) y i (s 0 ) q(s 0 )η(s 0 ) (71) s t E which shows that s t E π q(s t )y i (s t ) is finite. We claim that lim inf τ s τ F τ π q (s τ )q(s τ )θ(s τ ) 0. (72) 26
28 Since θ is essentially bounded, it follows that s τ F τ π q (s τ )q(s τ )θ(s τ ) s τ F τ π q (s τ )q(s τ )b(s τ ) τ, (73) for some bounded portfolio strategy b. Since σ qj (s 0 ) = 0, (9) implies that the limit, as τ goes to infinity, of the righthand side of (73) is positive. Inequalities (72) and (70) imply (48), that is s t E π q (s t )c(s t ) s t E π q (s t )y i (s t ) + q(s 0 )α i, (74) Using the same arguments as in the proof of Lemma A.1 we can rewrite (74) as Thus c B AD (P ; ω i ). P (c) P (ω i ). (75) Suppose now that c B AD (P ; ω i ). In the proof of Lemma A.1 we constructed a portfolio strategy that generates c at security prices q and satisfies the wealth constraint. That is, q(s t )θ(s t ) 1 π q (s t ) s τ E + (s t ) π q (s τ )y i (s τ ) s t. (76) Using (68) we obtain q(s t )θ(s t ) q(s t )η(s t ) s t, (77) which implies that θ is essentially bounded. Consequently, c B b (q; y i, α i ). Proof of Theorem 6.2: Lemma A.2 implies that consumption plan c i is optimal for each i in sequential markets under the constraint of essentially bounded portfolio strategies. The proof that portfolio strategies that generate the optimal consumption plans clear security markets is the same as in Theorem 5.1. Proof of Theorem 6.3: It follows immediately from Lemma A.2. 27
29 References 1. C. D. Aliprantis, D. Brown and O Burkinshaw, Edgeworth equilibria, Econometrica 55 (1987), C. D. Aliprantis, D. Brown and O. Burkinshaw, Existence and Optimality of Competitive Equilibria, Springer, K. Arrow, On the role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk bearing, Review of Economic Studies (1964). 4. T. Bewely, Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities, J. of Econ. Theory 4 (1972), O. Blanchard and S. Fischer, Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press, Cambridge, G. Debreu, Valuation Equilibrium and Pareto Optimum, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A 40 (1954), D. Duffie and C. Huang, Implementing ArrowDebreu equilibria by continuous trading of few longlived securities, Econometrica 53 (1985), M. Florenzano and P. Gourdel, Incomplete markets in infinite horizon: Debt constraints versus node prices. Mathematical Finance 6 (1996), A. Hernandez and M. Santos, Competitive equilibria for infinite horizon economies with incomplete markets, J. of Econ. Theory 71 (1996), K. Huang and J. Werner, Asset Price bubbles in ArrowDebreu and sequential equilibrium, Economic Theory 15 (2000), M. Kandori, Equivalent equilibria, International Economic Review 29 (1988), N. Kocherlakota, Bubbles and constraints on debt accumulation, J. of Econ. Theory 57 (1992), D. Levine and W. Zame, Debt constraints and equilibrium in infinite horizon economies with incomplete markets, J. of Math. Econ. 26 (1996), M. Magill and M. Quinzii, Infinite horizon incomplete markets, Econometrica 62 (1994),
30 15. M. J. P. Magill and M. Quinzii, Incomplete markets over an infinite horizon: long lived securities and speculative bubbles, J. of Math. Econ. 26 (1996), L. Montrucchio and F. Privileggi, On fragility of bubbles in equilibrium asset pricing models of Lucastype, J. of Econ. Theory 101 (2001), B. Peleg and M. Yaari, Markets with countably many commodities, International Economic Review 11 (1970). 18. M. Santos and M. Woodford, Rational asset pricing bubbles, Econometrica 65 (1997), J. Tirole, On the possibility of speculation under rational expectations, Econometrica 50 (1982), R. Wright, Market structure and competitive equilibrium in dynamic equilibrium models, J. of Econ. Theory 41, (1987). 29
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING 1. Introduction The BlackScholes theory, which is the main subject of this course and its sequel, is based on the Efficient Market Hypothesis, that arbitrages
More informationNotes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory. 1 Walrasian Equilibrium and Excess Demand
Notes V General Equilibrium: Positive Theory In this lecture we go on considering a general equilibrium model of a private ownership economy. In contrast to the Notes IV, we focus on positive issues such
More informationThe MarketClearing Model
Chapter 5 The MarketClearing Model Most of the models that we use in this book build on two common assumptions. First, we assume that there exist markets for all goods present in the economy, and that
More informationEquilibrium with Complete Markets
Equilibrium with Complete Markets Jesús FernándezVillaverde University of Pennsylvania February 12, 2016 Jesús FernándezVillaverde (PENN) Equilibrium with Complete Markets February 12, 2016 1 / 24 ArrowDebreu
More informationWorking Paper Series
RGEA Universidade de Vigo http://webs.uvigo.es/rgea Working Paper Series A Market Game Approach to Differential Information Economies Guadalupe Fugarolas, Carlos HervésBeloso, Emma Moreno García and
More informationFirst Welfare Theorem
First Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 17, November 2 Outline 1 First Welfare Theorem 2 Preliminaries to Second Welfare Theorem Last Class Definitions A feasible allocation (x, y) is Pareto
More informationCurrent Accounts in Open Economies Obstfeld and Rogoff, Chapter 2
Current Accounts in Open Economies Obstfeld and Rogoff, Chapter 2 1 Consumption with many periods 1.1 Finite horizon of T Optimization problem maximize U t = u (c t ) + β (c t+1 ) + β 2 u (c t+2 ) +...
More informationA Simple Model of Price Dispersion *
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 112 http://www.dallasfed.org/assets/documents/institute/wpapers/2012/0112.pdf A Simple Model of Price Dispersion
More informationOn the irrelevance of government debt when taxes are distortionary
On the irrelevance of government debt when taxes are distortionary Marco Bassetto a,b,, Narayana Kocherlakota c,b a Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, 271 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55455,
More informationLeveraged purchases of government debt and deflation
Leveraged purchases of government debt and deflation R. Anton Braun Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Tomoyuki Nakajima Kyoto University October 5, 2011 Abstract We consider a model in which individuals
More information4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLEPERIOD MARKET MODELS Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2015 B. Goldys and M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: SinglePeriod Market
More informationECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE
ECON20310 LECTURE SYNOPSIS REAL BUSINESS CYCLE YUAN TIAN This synopsis is designed merely for keep a record of the materials covered in lectures. Please refer to your own lecture notes for all proofs.
More informationUniversidad de Montevideo Macroeconomia II. The RamseyCassKoopmans Model
Universidad de Montevideo Macroeconomia II Danilo R. Trupkin Class Notes (very preliminar) The RamseyCassKoopmans Model 1 Introduction One shortcoming of the Solow model is that the saving rate is exogenous
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationLecture 3: Growth with Overlapping Generations (Acemoglu 2009, Chapter 9, adapted from Zilibotti)
Lecture 3: Growth with Overlapping Generations (Acemoglu 2009, Chapter 9, adapted from Zilibotti) Kjetil Storesletten September 10, 2013 Kjetil Storesletten () Lecture 3 September 10, 2013 1 / 44 Growth
More informationWorking Paper Series
RGEA Universidade de Vigo http://webs.uvigo.es/rgea Working Paper Series General Equilibrium with Private State Verification João CorreiadaSilva and Carlos HervésBeloso 508 Facultade de Ciencias Económicas
More informationSensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes
Sensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes Dmitry Kramkov, Carnegie Mellon University Based on a paper with Mihai Sirbu from Columbia University Math Finance Seminar,
More informationChap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models
Chap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models 1 Asset Pricing Model a logical extension of portfolio selection theory is to consider the equilibrium asset pricing consequences of investors individually
More informationOLG Models. Jesús FernándezVillaverde. University of Pennsylvania. February 12, 2016
OLG Models Jesús FernándezVillaverde University of Pennsylvania February 12, 2016 Jesús FernándezVillaverde (PENN) OLG Models February 12, 2016 1 / 53 Overlapping Generations The Overlapping Generations
More informationCHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e.
CHAPTER II THE LIMIT OF A SEQUENCE OF NUMBERS DEFINITION OF THE NUMBER e. This chapter contains the beginnings of the most important, and probably the most subtle, notion in mathematical analysis, i.e.,
More informationChapter 7. Sealedbid Auctions
Chapter 7 Sealedbid Auctions An auction is a procedure used for selling and buying items by offering them up for bid. Auctions are often used to sell objects that have a variable price (for example oil)
More informationSUSTAINABLE PLANS AND DEBT
1 Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department (JV SR125) ONE GRAPH SUSTAINABLE PLANS AND DEBT V. V. Chari Patrick J. Kehoe* Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
More informationEconomics 200B Part 1 UCSD Winter 2015 Prof. R. Starr, Mr. John Rehbeck Final Exam 1
Economics 200B Part 1 UCSD Winter 2015 Prof. R. Starr, Mr. John Rehbeck Final Exam 1 Your Name: SUGGESTED ANSWERS Please answer all questions. Each of the six questions marked with a big number counts
More informationDEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSIONFREE ABELIAN GROUPS
DEGREES OF ORDERS ON TORSIONFREE ABELIAN GROUPS ASHER M. KACH, KAREN LANGE, AND REED SOLOMON Abstract. We construct two computable presentations of computable torsionfree abelian groups, one of isomorphism
More informationTrading and rational security pricing bubbles JeanMarc Bottazzi a Jaime Luque b Mário R. Páscoa c
Working Paper 1119 Departamento de Economía Economic Series Universidad Carlos III de Madrid May, 2011 Calle Madrid, 126 28903 Getafe (Spain) Fax (34) 916249875 Trading and rational security pricing bubbles
More informationAt t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem:
Internet Appendix for A Model of hadow Banking * At t = 0, a generic intermediary j solves the optimization problem: max ( D, I H, I L, H, L, TH, TL ) [R (I H + T H H ) + p H ( H T H )] + [E ω (π ω ) A
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closedbook exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationGains from Trade. Christopher P. Chambers and Takashi Hayashi. March 25, 2013. Abstract
Gains from Trade Christopher P. Chambers Takashi Hayashi March 25, 2013 Abstract In a market design context, we ask whether there exists a system of transfers regulations whereby gains from trade can always
More information6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 5: Existence of a Nash Equilibrium
6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 5: Existence of a Nash Equilibrium Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 18, 2010 1 Introduction Outline PricingCongestion Game Example Existence of a Mixed
More informationUNIVERSITY OF VIENNA
WORKING PAPERS Egbert Dierker Hildegard Dierker Birgit Grodal Nonexistence of Constrained Efficient Equilibria when Markets are Incomplete August 2001 Working Paper No: 0111 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY
More informationGENERALIZED BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM
Alexander Karpov, Semyon Yurkov GENERALIZED BANKRUPTCY PROBLEM BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: FINANCIAL ECONOMICS WP BRP 08/FE/2012 This Working Paper is an output of a research project
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationInstitutional Finance 08: Dynamic Arbitrage to Replicate Nonlinear Payoffs. Binomial Option Pricing: Basics (Chapter 10 of McDonald)
Copyright 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 081 Institutional Finance 08: Dynamic Arbitrage to Replicate Nonlinear Payoffs Binomial Option Pricing: Basics (Chapter 10 of McDonald) Originally prepared
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationPart IV. Arbitrage Pricing
Part IV Arbitrage Pricing Chapter : ArrowDebreu Pricing II: the Arbitrage Perspective. Introduction Chapter 8 presented the ArrowDebreu asset pricing theory from the equilibrium perspective. With the
More informationHOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!
Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following
More informationChapter 1: Financial Markets and Financial Derivatives
Chapter 1: Financial Markets and Financial Derivatives 1.1 Financial Markets Financial markets are markets for financial instruments, in which buyers and sellers find each other and create or exchange
More informationRi and. i=1. S i N. and. R R i
The subset R of R n is a closed rectangle if there are n nonempty closed intervals {[a 1, b 1 ], [a 2, b 2 ],..., [a n, b n ]} so that R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a 2, b 2 ] [a n, b n ]. The subset R of R n is an
More informationRetirement Financial Planning: A State/Preference Approach. William F. Sharpe 1 February, 2006
Retirement Financial Planning: A State/Preference Approach William F. Sharpe 1 February, 2006 Introduction This paper provides a framework for analyzing a prototypical set of decisions concerning spending,
More informationConvex analysis and profit/cost/support functions
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Convex analysis and profit/cost/support functions KC Border October 2004 Revised January 2009 Let A be a subset of R m
More informationLECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS
LECTURE 15: AMERICAN OPTIONS 1. Introduction All of the options that we have considered thus far have been of the European variety: exercise is permitted only at the termination of the contract. These
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationLecture 8: Market Equilibria
Computational Aspects of Game Theory Bertinoro Spring School 2011 Lecturer: Bruno Codenotti Lecture 8: Market Equilibria The market setting transcends the scenario of games. The decentralizing effect of
More informationInsurance. Michael Peters. December 27, 2013
Insurance Michael Peters December 27, 2013 1 Introduction In this chapter, we study a very simple model of insurance using the ideas and concepts developed in the chapter on risk aversion. You may recall
More informationOther variables as arguments besides S. Want those other variables to be observables.
Valuation of options before expiration Need to distinguish between American and European options. Consider European options with time t until expiration. Value now of receiving c T at expiration? (Value
More informationReview of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology
Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology March 24, 2005 1 Introduction The purchase of an options contract gives the buyer the right to buy call options contract or sell put options contract some
More informationMoral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 PrincipalAgent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More informationASimpleMarketModel. 2.1 Model Assumptions. Assumption 2.1 (Two trading dates)
2 ASimpleMarketModel In the simplest possible market model there are two assets (one stock and one bond), one time step and just two possible future scenarios. Many of the basic ideas of mathematical finance
More informationChapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model
Chapter 21: The Discounted Utility Model 21.1: Introduction This is an important chapter in that it introduces, and explores the implications of, an empirically relevant utility function representing intertemporal
More informationFIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.
FIRST YEAR CALCULUS WWLCHENW L c WWWL W L Chen, 1982, 2008. 2006. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It It is is
More informationOptions pricing in discrete systems
UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI, FAKULTETA ZA MATEMATIKO IN FIZIKO Options pricing in discrete systems Seminar II Mentor: prof. Dr. Mihael Perman Author: Gorazd Gotovac //2008 Abstract This paper is a basic introduction
More information1 Interest rates, and riskfree investments
Interest rates, and riskfree investments Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman. Interest and compounded interest Suppose that you place x 0 ($) in an account that offers a fixed (never to change over time)
More informationArrow Debreu Prices. Dirk Becherer, Mark H.A. Davis  this draft: May 26, 2008
Arrow Debreu Prices Dirk Becherer, Mark H.A. Davis  this draft: May 26, 2008 Arrow Debreu prices are the prices of atomic time and state contingent claims which deliver one unit of a specific consumption
More informationAbstract. A Study of the Interaction of Insurance and Financial Markets: Efficiency and Full Insurance Coverage. Abstract
Abstract A Study of the Interaction of Insurance and Financial Markets: Efficiency and Full Insurance Coverage Abstract This paper studies the interaction between insurance and capital markets within a
More informationMidterm Exam:Answer Sheet
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a riskfree and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
More information1 Introduction to Option Pricing
ESTM 60202: Financial Mathematics Alex Himonas 03 Lecture Notes 1 October 7, 2009 1 Introduction to Option Pricing We begin by defining the needed finance terms. Stock is a certificate of ownership of
More informationMathematical finance and linear programming (optimization)
Mathematical finance and linear programming (optimization) Geir Dahl September 15, 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this short note is to explain how linear programming (LP) (=linear optimization) may
More informationA short note on American option prices
A short note on American option Filip Lindskog April 27, 2012 1 The setup An American call option with strike price K written on some stock gives the holder the right to buy a share of the stock (exercise
More informationON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE. 1. Introduction
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE J.M. CALABUIG, J. RODRÍGUEZ, AND E.A. SÁNCHEZPÉREZ Abstract. Let m be a vector measure taking values in a Banach space X. We prove that
More informationOn the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information
Finance 400 A. Penati  G. Pennacchi Notes on On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information by Sanford Grossman This model shows how the heterogeneous information
More informationCHAPTER 7: PROPERTIES OF STOCK OPTION PRICES
CHAPER 7: PROPERIES OF SOCK OPION PRICES 7.1 Factors Affecting Option Prices able 7.1 Summary of the Effect on the Price of a Stock Option of Increasing One Variable While Keeping All Other Fixed Variable
More informationName. Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions.
Name Final Exam, Economics 210A, December 2011 Here are some remarks to help you with answering the questions. Question 1. A firm has a production function F (x 1, x 2 ) = ( x 1 + x 2 ) 2. It is a price
More informationChapter 2 An Introduction to Forwards and Options
Chapter 2 An Introduction to Forwards and Options Question 2.1. The payoff diagram of the stock is just a graph of the stock price as a function of the stock price: In order to obtain the profit diagram
More informationArbitrage and asset market equilibrium in infinite dimensional economies with riskaverse expected utilities
Arbitrage and asset market equilibrium in infinite dimensional economies with riskaverse expected utilities Thai HaHuy, Cuong Le Van and ManhHung Nguyen April 22, 2013 Abstract We consider a model with
More informationThe Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem
The Goldberg Rao Algorithm for the Maximum Flow Problem COS 528 class notes October 18, 2006 Scribe: Dávid Papp Main idea: use of the blocking flow paradigm to achieve essentially O(min{m 2/3, n 1/2 }
More informationInflation. Chapter 8. 8.1 Money Supply and Demand
Chapter 8 Inflation This chapter examines the causes and consequences of inflation. Sections 8.1 and 8.2 relate inflation to money supply and demand. Although the presentation differs somewhat from that
More informationThe Discrete Binomial Model for Option Pricing
The Discrete Binomial Model for Option Pricing Rebecca Stockbridge Program in Applied Mathematics University of Arizona May 4, 2008 Abstract This paper introduces the notion of option pricing in the context
More informationSocial Security with Heterogeneous Populations Subject to Demographic Shocks
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 26: 5 24, 2001 c 2001 The Geneva Association Social Security with Heterogeneous Populations Subject to Demographic Shocks GABRIELLE DEMANGE DELTA, 48 Boulevard
More informationLecture 11: Sponsored search
Computational Learning Theory Spring Semester, 2009/10 Lecture 11: Sponsored search Lecturer: Yishay Mansour Scribe: Ben Pere, Jonathan Heimann, Alon Levin 11.1 Sponsored Search 11.1.1 Introduction Search
More informationWalrasian Demand. u(x) where B(p, w) = {x R n + : p x w}.
Walrasian Demand Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 5, September 16 Outline 1 Walrasian Demand 2 Properties of Walrasian Demand 3 An Optimization Recipe 4 First and Second Order Conditions Definition Walrasian
More informationU.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009. Notes on Algebra
U.C. Berkeley CS276: Cryptography Handout 0.1 Luca Trevisan January, 2009 Notes on Algebra These notes contain as little theory as possible, and most results are stated without proof. Any introductory
More informationLecture 6: Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Lecture 6: Arbitrage Pricing Theory Investments FIN460Papanikolaou APT 1/ 48 Overview 1. Introduction 2. MultiFactor Models 3. The Arbitrage Pricing Theory FIN460Papanikolaou APT 2/ 48 Introduction
More informationOption pricing. Vinod Kothari
Option pricing Vinod Kothari Notation we use this Chapter will be as follows: S o : Price of the share at time 0 S T : Price of the share at time T T : time to maturity of the option r : risk free rate
More informationSeparation Properties for Locally Convex Cones
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
More informationIRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction
IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible
More informationECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015
ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 These notes have been used before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1
More informationWeek 5 Integral Polyhedra
Week 5 Integral Polyhedra We have seen some examples 1 of linear programming formulation that are integral, meaning that every basic feasible solution is an integral vector. This week we develop a theory
More informationK 1 < K 2 = P (K 1 ) P (K 2 ) (6) This holds for both American and European Options.
Slope and Convexity Restrictions and How to implement Arbitrage Opportunities 1 These notes will show how to implement arbitrage opportunities when either the slope or the convexity restriction is violated.
More informationOptimal Security Design
Optimal Security Design Franklin Allen University of Pennsylvania Douglas Gale University of Pittsburgh How should new securities be designed? Traditional theories have little to say on this: the literature
More informationQuasistatic evolution and congested transport
Quasistatic evolution and congested transport Inwon Kim Joint with Damon Alexander, Katy Craig and Yao Yao UCLA, UW Madison Hard congestion in crowd motion The following crowd motion model is proposed
More informationBad Reputation. March 26, 2002
Bad Reputation Jeffrey C. Ely Juuso Välimäki March 26, 2002 Abstract We study the classical reputation model in which a longrun player faces a sequence of shortrun players and would like to establish
More informationGeneral Equilibrium Theory: Examples
General Equilibrium Theory: Examples 3 examples of GE: pure exchange (Edgeworth box) 1 producer  1 consumer several producers and an example illustrating the limits of the partial equilibrium approach
More informationThe Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains?
The Greater the Differences, the Greater the Gains? Wilfred J. Ethier Department of Economics University of Pennsylvania First version: 30 November 2007 This printing: 21 April 2009 The Greater the Differences,
More informationFIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 Options These notes consider the way put and call options and the underlying can be combined to create hedges, spreads and combinations. We will consider the
More informationSecurity Pools and Efficiency
Security Pools and Efficiency John Geanakoplos Yale University William R. Zame UCLA Abstract Collateralized mortgage obligations, collateralized debt obligations and other bundles of securities that are
More informationOptimal Investment with Derivative Securities
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Optimal Investment with Derivative Securities Aytaç İlhan 1, Mattias Jonsson 2, Ronnie Sircar 3 1 Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford,
More informationThe Relation between Two Present Value Formulae
James Ciecka, Gary Skoog, and Gerald Martin. 009. The Relation between Two Present Value Formulae. Journal of Legal Economics 15(): pp. 6174. The Relation between Two Present Value Formulae James E. Ciecka,
More informationSession IX: Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo. Module: Economics of Financial Markets. MSc. Financial Economics
Session IX: Stock Options: Properties, Mechanics and Valuation Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo Module: Economics of Financial Markets MSc. Financial Economics Department of Economics, City University, London Stock
More informationLecture 4: Properties of stock options
Lecture 4: Properties of stock options Reading: J.C.Hull, Chapter 9 An European call option is an agreement between two parties giving the holder the right to buy a certain asset (e.g. one stock unit)
More informationIntroduction. Agents have preferences over the two goods which are determined by a utility function. Speci cally, type 1 agents utility is given by
Introduction General equilibrium analysis looks at how multiple markets come into equilibrium simultaneously. With many markets, equilibrium analysis must take explicit account of the fact that changes
More information1 Introduction. Linear Programming. Questions. A general optimization problem is of the form: choose x to. max f(x) subject to x S. where.
Introduction Linear Programming Neil Laws TT 00 A general optimization problem is of the form: choose x to maximise f(x) subject to x S where x = (x,..., x n ) T, f : R n R is the objective function, S
More informationx if x 0, x if x < 0.
Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the
More informationInvesting without credible interperiod regulations:
Investing without credible interperiod regulations: A bargaining approach with application to investments in natural resources jell Bjørn Nordal ecember 999 Permanent address and affiliation: Post doctor
More informationWhen is Reputation Bad? 1
When is Reputation Bad? 1 Jeffrey Ely Drew Fudenberg David K Levine 2 First Version: April 22, 2002 This Version: November 20, 2005 Abstract: In traditional reputation theory, the ability to build a reputation
More informationStochastic Inventory Control
Chapter 3 Stochastic Inventory Control 1 In this chapter, we consider in much greater details certain dynamic inventory control problems of the type already encountered in section 1.3. In addition to the
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationNumerical Analysis Lecture Notes
Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes Peter J. Olver 5. Inner Products and Norms The norm of a vector is a measure of its size. Besides the familiar Euclidean norm based on the dot product, there are a number
More informationMATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.
MATH10212 Linear Algebra Textbook: D. Poole, Linear Algebra: A Modern Introduction. Thompson, 2006. ISBN 0534405967. Systems of Linear Equations Definition. An ndimensional vector is a row or a column
More informationECON 301: General Equilibrium I (Exchange) 1. Intermediate Microeconomics II, ECON 301. General Equilibrium I: Exchange
ECON 301: General Equilibrium I (Exchange) 1 Intermediate Microeconomics II, ECON 301 General Equilibrium I: Exchange The equilibrium concepts you have used till now in your Introduction to Economics,
More information