ID: EPA-HQ-OAR ;
|
|
- Sophie Owen
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Attn: From: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) Docket ID No. OAR Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code 28221T 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC CACI Energy & Environment Council Date: December 1, 2014 Re: Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR ; Proposed Rule - Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units This memorandum summarizes the Colorado Association of Commerce & Industry s (CACI) comments on the President s proposed Clean Power Plan (CPP) to be administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Background: As the voice of business and as Colorado s Chamber of Commerce, we believe the EPA lacks the legal authority to implement the Clean Power Plan (CPP) under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The proposed rule inappropriately and greatly expands regulatory burdens and costs to both our electricity producers and the consumers, with no demonstrable benefit in the United States or abroad. Not only will consumer budgets be hurt by this proposed rule, businesses and manufacturers, producers, employers and the innovators of our communities will be hit even harder with considerably higher compliance costs, higher business costs and we believe this rule will force some of our greatest job creators out of state or overseas. Coloradans value their business spirit, stewardship of the land and their ability to turn ideas into benefits for the economy and their state. Given this understanding and pro-business environment, CACI believes this rule creates unnecessary costs and burdens for electricity providers and those businesses who rely on affordable energy. Although this rule is aimed at coal-fired plants, it will negatively affect virtually all sectors of the nation s economy and not just Colorado. Concerns: The U.S. truly needs an all-of-the-above energy strategy to ensure we are responsibly developing energy sources while meeting consumer demands, protecting the environment and modernizing extraction and refining processes through market-led efficiencies. This means adopting policies that encourage development of all energy source options, without favoring one specific source over another. By allowing businesses and consumers to self-select, 1
2 we encourage energy-efficiency by allowing consumers, not the EPA or the federal government, to choose preferred sources. Allowing consumer choice prevents the inefficiencies that inevitably come with government-led, command and control regulation. The Clean Power Plan (CPP) will increase energy costs across the board. By the EPA s own admission, the CPP will increase energy prices by an average of 6-7% in 2020, and as much as 12% in some locations. EPA suggests annual compliance costs of between $5.4 billion and $7.4 billion in 2020, rising up to $8.8 billion in We note that these figures are power sector compliance costs only, and fail to reflect or capture the subsequent adverse spillover impacts of higher electricity rates on our nation s overall economic activity and perhaps most importantly, the higher rates that will be forced upon those already choosing between heating their homes and feeding their families. While the EPA acknowledges high expected costs will be realized should the proposed rule be implemented, independent analyses have shown energy prices could be substantially higher than EPA s estimates. An analysis by NERA Economic Consulting indicated that average U.S. electricity prices would increase by 12% per year and the total costs of the rule could be between $366 billion and $479 billion over a 15-year timeframe. 1 Many of these costs will have to be absorbed by residential, commercial and industrial energy consumers who will not only pay more for energy, but could also be forced to purchase equipment for compliance. Moreover, higher energy prices disproportionately harm low-income and middle-income families, whether it s the increased cost of home heating or as reflected in higher food prices. In comments submitted to the EPA by the Teamsters union and unions representing the iron workers, boilermakers, electric workers, miners and truckers, they found the Proposed Rule would result in a direct loss of 52,000 jobs in the electric utility, mining and rail sectors due to plant closures from this rule. They see an additional 100,000 indirect jobs at risk for loss in communities affected by the closures. Job losses would be concentrated in, relatively poor, rural areas that are least able to afford the loss of high-wage skilled jobs. Since 2001, energy costs for middle-income and lower-income families have increased by 27 percent, while their incomes have declined by 22 percent. 2 The EPA s proposed rule will further widen this gap. Regulatory costs will not ensure meaningful reductions in global GHGs. EPA s regulations will impose billions of dollars in costs on the U.S. economy but fail to meaningfully reduce CO 2 emissions on a global scale. For example, the projected CO 2 emission reduction from EPA s proposed rule is, at most, 555 million metric tons (mmt) in 2030, which represents only 1.3 percent of projected global CO 2 emissions in that year. 3 This reduction in 2030 would offset the equivalent of just 13.5 days of CO 2 emissions from China. 4 1 NERA Economic Consulting, Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan, October Available at: EPA, Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants and Emission Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Power Plants, June 2014; EIA, International Energy Outlook 2013 (projecting global emissions of 41, 464 mmt in 2030). 4 The Energy Information Administration projects that China will emit more than 14 billion tonnes of CO in Source: 2
3 Meanwhile, the U.S. has led the world in reducing CO 2 emissions. Since 2005, U.S. emissions have fallen by 13 percent while China s have grown by 69 percent and India s have increased by 53 percent. 5 International emissions will only continue to grow rapidly between 2011 and 2030, CO 2 emissions from non-oecd nations are projected to grow by nine billion tons per year. 6 In other words, for every ton of CO 2 reduced in 2030 as a result of EPA s proposed rule, the rest of the world will have increased emissions by more than 16 tons. Energy Reliability Will Be Undermined: Despite EPA Administrator McCarthy s adamance that the CPP will not and cannot harm energy reliability 7, experts and stakeholders have serious concerns that the CPP will do exactly that: harm energy reliability through increased stress to the electricity infrastructure and by regulations creating uncertainty in the market. The North American Electricity Reliability Corporation (NERC) reviewed EPA s rule and concluded that the agency s proposed regulatory deadlines would increase the use of controlled load shedding and potential for wide-scale, uncontrolled outages". 8 At CACI, we believe it is imperative that such reliability concerns be addressed by the EPA before proceeding with this proposed rule. This analysis will ensure we know the burdens this proposed rule may place on reliability and address those prior to implementation of the CPP. It is also worth noting that with an increased focus on decreasing emissions federal regulations like the Utility Mercury and Air Toxics Standard (MATS), closures have been hastened for a significant number of coal-fired plants. This in turn has increased the use of natural gas, particularly during recent polar vortex storms. Demand during the 2014 storm not only strained natural gas resources, but it outpaced supply and consumers saw their average per/megawatt hour cost jump from $42 to $1,000. This order of magnitude price increase occurred despite the fact coal-fired power plants were supplementing power and heat sources. Since then, several of these coal-fired power plants have closed due to regulatory burdens, leaving an already stressed power grid even more vulnerable to major temperature swings. For example, 89% of mid-atlantic coal-fired power plants relied upon last winter are scheduled to shut down in This is a clear-cut example of the direct, negative impact EPA regulations already had on the electricity grid; and this has occurred, before the most sweeping EPA air regulation ever the CPP is even implemented. Put simply, EPA s passive reassurances that the CPP will not materially affect electricity prices or grid reliability ring hollow. A much more robust analysis of the impacts the CPP will have on this country s energy consumption and infrastructure must occur before this rule is adopted. The CPP will drive manufacturing and jobs out of state and overseas. Despite U.S. businesses being some of the most efficient generators and consumers of energy, businesses who EIA, International Energy Outlook osed_cpp_final.pdf 3
4 once thrived in the U.S. market will inevitably seek out less hostile and more cost-effective operating environments. CACI believes the proposed rule will impose costs on U.S. businesses in numerous ways without meaningfully reducing global GHG emissions the stated goal of the EPA s proposed rule. CACI proposes instead that the EPA look to promote jobs and production in the less-carbon-intensive U.S. economy, while giving more consideration to the efficiencies businesses and industries have already voluntarily undertaken. EPA lacks authority to issue 111(d) regulations, because existing coal-fired power plants are already regulated by Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. Based upon the plain language of the Clean Air Act, the EPA does not have legal authority to regulate GHG emissions from existing power plants which are already regulated under Section 112 National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) of the Clean Air Act. Plain Language of Clean Air Act: The EPA seeks to regulate GHG emissions from existing power plants under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Existing Source Performance Standards or ESPS ). Those same power plants are already regulated as existing sources under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (NESHAP). Under the plain language of Section 111(d), the EPA cannot establish ESPS for existing sources for any air pollutant emitted from any source category that is regulated under a Section 112 NESHAP. U.S. Supreme Court Precedent: U.S. Supreme Court case law unequivocally affirms the prohibition on regulating pollutants under Section 111(d) if they are already regulated under Section 112. In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 131 S. Ct (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court noted that EPA may not employ [ESPS under Section 111(d)] if existing stationary sources of the pollutant in question are regulated under the [NAAQS] program or the [NESHAP] program [under Section 112]. AEP, 131 S. Ct. at 2537 & n.7. EPA s Own Words: In its proposed Clean Air Mercury Rule, the EPA recognized that a literal interpretation of Section 111(d) would prevent the agency from regulating pollutants from sources regulated under Section 112. See 69 Fed. Reg. 4651, 4685 (Jan. 30, 2004). EPA lacks authority to set binding state emission rate targets because such authority lies with the states. Under the Clean Air Act states, EPA s authority under 111(d) is clearly limited to establishing procedures by which states submit plans establishing standards of performance. The CPP is unlawful because EPA has misinterpreted the unambiguous language in section 111(d) and hijacked the duty to establish standards of performance from the states. To remedy this, the final rule must allow states the flexibility to establish their own performance standards based on the unique circumstances of their state, and including efforts already made to increase energy efficiencies. EPA exceeds its CAA authority by applying performance standards on sources and sectors outside the fence line of the regulated unit. Under section 111(d) of the CAA, EPA s authority is limited to regulating emissions from existing sources within a specific source category (in this 4
5 instance, fossil fuel-fired electric generating units or EGUs). Despite this clear statutory limitation, the CPP reaches well beyond emission reductions at existing fossil-fueled EGUs and requires reductions from virtually the entire energy sector. The CPP goes so far as to mandate changes in consumer behavior. Through its four building blocks in the Proposed Rule, EPA defines the Best System of Emission Reduction (BSER) for fossil fuel-fired EGUs as a combination of emission reductions from efficiency upgrades at coal-fired power units, increased utilization of natural gas units, extending the life of nuclear plants, installing more renewable power and significant gains in demand-side energy efficiency. Such a sweeping effort under the guise an integrated electricity system 9 has never been attempted before, under BSER or any other EPA program. This approach for defining BSER stretches so far beyond the fence-line of a regulated facility that literally every consumer of electricity in the United States could be implicated as a potential compliance option. In essence, EPA is dictating climate change and energy policy for the states via the Proposed Rule. This new role of EPA has proposed for itself is certainly not authorized by the Clean Air Act and is well beyond EPA s regulatory expertise. Moreover, the reduction targets set for Colorado do not give it credit for already promoting fuel switching via legislation and dual-track rulemaking by its Air Quality Control Commission and Public Utilities Commission pursuant to the Clean Air, Clean Jobs Act. This puts Colorado at a competitive disadvantage, effectively punishing it for doing lawfully at the state level what EPA improperly seeks to do unilaterally at the federal level. As the voice of business in Colorado, we say strongly that this approach is not only unprecedented, it is unlawful. We request that EPA reevaluate its proposed method for establishing BSER and limit any guidance in setting performance standards to actions that can reasonably take place within the fence-line of a regulated facility. EPA further lacks authority to implement CPP, because it cannot set standards in states where the agency itself lacks authority to implement those standards specifically building blocks two, three and four of the CPP. #2: The EPA cannot and does not have the authority to make energy dispatching decisions. Only states have the authority to regulate power within their borders, as granted by the Federal Powers Act. #3: The National Regulatory Commission (NRC) has authority over permitting of nuclear, not the EPA. Yet this is one of the relied-upon building blocks for EPA s implementation of the CPP proposal. Likewise, states too have the singular authority, as is specifically designated by the Clean Air Act, to implement renewable portfolio standards (RPS) and not the EPA Fed. Reg. at 34,836 5
6 #4: EPA s proposal exceeds authority of the Clean Air Act. The EPA does not have the authority to mandate demand-side energy efficiency programs. As noted above, the EPA lacks authority to implement building blocks two, three, and four. Below are the reasons why those same building are heretofore, unsupported on the administrative record, result from invalid or unsupported assumptions, and likely violate the Administrative procedure Act. #1: From the business perspective, this proposal wrongly assumes businesses have not and are not taking opportunities to be more efficient, more cost-effective and therefore more competitive. #2: The Proposed Rule disregards how states have licensed combined cycle units and disregards whether those facilities are even permitted to operate, or capable of operating, at the higher capacities suggested by the EPA. This building block would exacerbate strains on an already limited natural gas pipeline and in the proposal, there is no accounting for infrastructure needed to make this switch to a greater reliance on natural gas, let alone to ensure uninterrupted electricity for consumers or businesses. Similar concerns exist under the plan s treatment of renewable power. #3: The EPA imprudently relies on all at risk nuclear infrastructure to remain online to reach emission goals; making the assumption that all 6% of at risk plants will remain online and therefore reduce emissions. We believe this is an unrealistic and flawed model for the EPA to be relying upon for fully one quarter of its proposal. EPA should not expand greenhouse gas regulations to other source categories. Not only does the CPP extend the EPA s reach unnecessarily and without authority in one sector, we believe there is no legal obligation for EPA to address other source categories. Other sourcespecific regulations would and should require a much broader, more complex consideration by the EPA and potential stakeholders. Rolling other source categories into the existing power plant rule fails to consider the complexity these multiple source categories present. Should the EPA implement regulations on other source categories, it will hit our manufacturers and producers the hardest, not only making everyday consumer goods more expensive, it will make our businesses and manufacturers less competitive at home and in overseas markets - before the product has even arrived on shelves. If businesses can t compete globally or are too burdened by regulation at home, it will result in job losses and a domino-effect of reduced economic activity all potentially without meaningfully reducing GHG emissions. Furthermore, the proposed other source provision is not necessary because it fails to recognize the efforts of business and industry to voluntarily reduce emissions, ignores their participation in extensive energy initiatives and disregards entirely an inherent motivation for businesses to be more energy efficient to be successful. Should the EPA insist on moving forward with this 6
7 provision, CACI suggests a state compliance plan should allow for exemption under any potential future Section 111 regulations. EPA s regulatory impact analysis of the proposed rules cost is both deficient and unreliable. First of all, CACI believes the EPA s economic analysis grossly overstates and overestimates the benefits of the proposed rules, while at the same time underestimating the real world burdens and translated costs on businesses and those they serve. A proper analysis of the CPP would show significant short- and long-term costs and not the benefits EPA has touted. The RIA is fundamentally flawed, and CACI believes, renders the CPP unlawful as currently proposed. It is especially distressing to CACI and the business community that the EPA has failed to convene a Small Business Advocacy Review panel and failed to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis to evaluate the proposed rule s impact on small businesses, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 10. Instead of conducting this analysis, EPA claims the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because States, not EPA, are ultimately responsible for implementing Section 111(d). 11 This claim is grossly inaccurate because the impact on electricity prices and the potential regulation of entities beyond the fence line will undoubtedly impact small businesses. We want to reiterate that electricity costs are a significant concern for many small businesses and energy costs are a top-three business expense for 35% of all small businesses. 12 For these reasons, EPA must withdraw the current proposal, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review panel, and prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis before proceeding with a new proposal under Section 111(d). Next, the term social cost of carbon is one that deserves more consideration. This is not because CACI believes the term has validity in this debate, but because this theory is not recognized as a legitimate economic metric or methodology and has not received general acceptance or even legitimate scrutiny necessary for a transparent rule-making. In addition, EPA s calculations failed to use full-employment modeling, skewing numbers and projections for the proposed rule. Specifically, EPA fails to consider or account for the existing power plant rules negative impact on employment within the industry or by industries which support and/or rely on coal-produced energy among the greater business community. Without such consideration, the EPA s analysis misses the impact its proposed rule will have on whole communities and end-users that need affordable electricity. Businesses, manufacturers, coal-producers and utilities will be affected by the rule, but individual families will feel the financial pain and burden of this rule the most. This significant gap is all the more remarkable given that the CPP will reach virtually every corner of the American energy sector and economy. Lastly, the EPA is drawing questionable conclusions about where it will or has been able to simultaneously reduce other pollutants, aside from GHGs. These reductions are inappropriately 10 The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), 5 U.S. Code 601 (1996) Fed. Reg. 34, National Federation of Independent Business, Energy, available at 7
8 reflected in the anticipated benefits the Proposed Rule. Such co-benefits have not been confirmed attributable to this rule and should not be considered as sufficient evidence to support the EPA s rule effectiveness. In Conclusion: As the voice of business and as Colorado s Chamber of Commerce, CACI believes the EPA lacks the legal authority under the CAA to go forward with the CPP as proposed. Moreover, the rule will greatly expand already significant regulatory burdens, and often unreliable, methods in support of the CPP. Most notably, the Proposed Rule fails to meaningfully or accurately consider the wide swath of likely costs and other burdens the rule will impose on citizens, business, and the American economy all while also failing to impact global levels of GHGs. CACI believes the United States needs an all-of-the-above energy strategy to ensure energy has a reliable energy infrastructure. An all-of-the above strategy allows consumer and manufacturer choice in energy source and to keep electricity prices affordable. CACI appreciates the opportunity to provide comments to this very important proposed rule. Unfortunately, as proposed, the CPP lacks authority under the CAA and other federal laws, and is not sufficiently supported by robust analysis in the administrative record. At a minimum, CACI would like to see the EPA clearly demonstrate its legal authority to regulate under Section 111(d), as well as provide a proper economic impact study corroborated by independent experts. Unless these steps are taken, EPA should withdraw the current proposal, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review panel, and prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis before proceeding with a new proposal. We urge the EPA to consider each of the concerns raised by CACI and our individual business members. If you should have any questions/concerns regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Dan O Connell, CACI Government Relations, at or DOcconnell@COChamber.com or Leah Curtsinger, CACI Federal Affairs at (303) or LCurtsinger@COChamber.com. Thank you. 8
Introduction POLICY. The U.S. Needs an All-of-the-Above Energy Strategy
The Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce and the Associated Industries of Arkansas, Inc., work jointly as the leading voice for business in Arkansas and serve as the primary business advocate on all issues
More informationComments on EPA s Proposed Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources
Michael S. McWaters Executive Vice President & CEO December 1, 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Submitted Electronically to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 Comments
More informationWritten Testimony Submitted by Mr. Michael Kezar General Manager San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Written Testimony Submitted by Mr. Michael Kezar General Manager San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Small Business Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and
More informationRESPONSE OF THE UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP TO EPA S CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A PROGRAM TO REDUCE CARBON POLLUTION FROM EXISTING POWER PLANTS
Introduction RESPONSE OF THE UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP TO EPA S CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A PROGRAM TO REDUCE CARBON POLLUTION FROM EXISTING POWER PLANTS October 2013 On September 23, 2013, the
More informationDecember 1, 2014. Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 RGGI States Supplemental Comments on Proposed Clean Power Plan
VIA EMAIL December 1, 2014 Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Mail code 28221T Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20460 A-and-R-Docket@epa.gov
More informationPublic Comment to EPA on New Stationary Sources Rule Sam Batkins and Catrina Rorke Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 May 9, 2014
Public Comment to EPA on New Stationary Sources Rule Sam Batkins and Catrina Rorke Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 May 9, 2014 Introduction We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Environmental
More informationHouston-Galveston Area Council Houston, Texas (by telephone) November 19, 2015
Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, Texas (by telephone) November 19, 2015 Summary Climate change is a threat in the U.S. -- We are already feeling the dangerous and costly effects of a changing climate
More informationClean Power Plan: MISO Analysis ADEQ/APSC Stakeholder Meeting
Clean Power Plan: MISO Analysis ADEQ/APSC Stakeholder Meeting 8/28/2014 The generation fleet in MISO is being affected by timing, fuel prices and multiple phases of environmental regulations. MATS CSAPR
More informationCLEAN POWER, CLEAR SAVINGS MAINE. The EPA Clean Power Plan Will Cut Maine Electricity Bills by 11.3 to 12.5 Percent by 2030
CLEAN POWER, CLEAR SAVINGS MAINE The EPA Clean Power Plan Will Cut Maine ity s by 11.3 to 12.5 Percent by 2030 Acknowledgments This report was written by David Arkush, managing director of Public Citizen
More informationIMPACTS OF EPA S CARBON PROPOSAL ON COLORADO
IMPACTS OF EPA S CARBON PROPOSAL ON COLORADO BACKGROUND In 2013, coal provided 64% of Colorado s electricity, with natural gas providing 20%, renewables 14%, and other sources providing the remaining 2%.
More informationEnergy Projections 2006 2030 Price and Policy Considerations. Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Energy Projections 2006 2030 Price and Policy Considerations Dr. Randy Hudson Oak Ridge National Laboratory There is perhaps no single current topic so potentially impacting to all life on this planet
More informationState of Colorado Comments Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 and Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0044
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) Mail Code: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460 RE: State of Colorado Comments Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 and
More informationFACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS
FACT SHEET PROPOSED MERCURY AND AIR TOXICS STANDARDS ACTION On March 16, 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule that would reduce emissions of toxic air pollutants from
More informationEPA s Clean Power Plan
EPA s Clean Power Plan Basics and Implications of the Proposed CO 2 Emissions Standard on Existing Fossil Units under CAA Section 111(d) PRESENTED TO Goldman Sachs Power, Utilities, MLP and Pipeline Conference
More informationEconomic Impacts of Potential Colorado Climate Change Initiatives: Evidence from MIT and Penn State Analyses. July 2007
Economic Impacts of Potential Colorado Climate Change Initiatives: Evidence from MIT and Penn State Analyses July 2007 Introduction California and other western states are actively pursuing a variety of
More informationCalifornia s Cap-and-Trade Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program
California s Cap-and-Trade Voluntary Renewable Electricity Program Cap-and-Trade Overview Outline Purpose of the Voluntary Renewable Electricity Account (VRE) Holding Account VRE Program Requirements Application
More informationIndiana Energy Conference
Indiana Energy Conference The Big Energy Shake-Up: Adapting to Change October 15, 2015 JW Marriott Indianapolis IN CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE: IMPACT ON ELECTRICITY COSTS FOR AMERICAN BUSINESS John P. Hughes
More informationEPA Clean Power Plan: Costs and Impacts on U.S. Energy Markets
EPA Clean Power Plan: Costs and Impacts on U.S. Energy Markets Energy Ventures Analysis, Inc. Prepared for: National Mining Association October 2014 Energy Ventures Analysis, Inc. 1 October 17, 2014 Table
More informationNEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN
ADVANCED ENERGY ECONOMY the business voice of advanced energy NEVADA S ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM AND THE CLEAN POWER PLAN The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will soon release the final rule for
More informationBefore the House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
Testimony of Katie Dykes Deputy Commissioner for Energy, Connecticut Department for Energy and Environmental Protection Chair, Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. Board of Directors November 18, 2015
More informationOctober 27, 2014. Docket No. CFPB-2014-0019, RIN 3170-AA10 Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C)
October 27, 2014 The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702 Monica Jackson Office of the Executive Secretary Consumer Financial
More informationRenewable Energy on Regional Power Grids Can Help States Meet Federal Carbon Standards
FACT SHEET Renewable Energy on Regional Power Grids Can Help States Meet Federal Carbon Standards In June 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used its authority under Section 111(d) of
More informationSustainable Business
Presents Sustainable Business and the Bottom Line By Anh H. Phan Special to RegScan By Anh H. Phan Special to RegScan Sustainable Business and the Bottom Line Since the Industrial revolution, the business
More informationReducing Carbon Pollution in D.C s Renewable Portfolio Standard Will Clean the Air without Impacting Ratepayers. Frequently Asked Questions
Reducing Carbon Pollution in D.C s Renewable Portfolio Standard Will Clean the Air without Impacting Ratepayers Summary: Frequently Asked Questions While Mid-Atlantic States like Delaware and New Jersey
More informationPresentation to the Staff Subcommittee on Gas 2010 NARUC Winter Committee Meetings Washington, D.C. February 14, 2010
Presentation to the Staff Subcommittee on Gas 2010 NARUC Winter Committee Meetings Washington, D.C. February 14, 2010 CenterPoint Energy, Inc. promotes the direct use of natural gas through energy efficiency
More informationThe Clean Power Plan and West Virginia:
Rate (lbs/mwh) The Clean Power Plan and West Virginia: Compliance Options and New Economic Opportunities 2,100 James Van Nostrand Evan Hansen Beren Argetsinger Joseph James WVU College of Law Center for
More informationStatement of Lawrence W. Kavanagh Vice President, Environment and Technology American Iron and Steel Institute Washington, D.C.
Statement of Lawrence W. Kavanagh Vice President, Environment and Technology American Iron and Steel Institute Washington, D.C. Submitted for the Record Committee on Small Business U.S. House of Representatives
More informationJanuary 21, 2016. The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania, Ave., NW Washington, D.C.
The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania, Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20460 January 21, 2016 RE: National Hydropower Association Comments on Docket No.
More informationBenefits of and Challenges to Energy Access in the 21 st Century: Electricity
Benefits of and Challenges to Energy Access in the 21 st Century: Electricity Testimony of Karen Kerrigan President & CEO Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council Before Subcommittee on Energy and Power
More informationPotential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan
Potential Energy Impacts of the EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan Prepared for: American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers Association of American Railroads American
More informationEPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country. Scott D. Deatherage 214-999-4979 sdeatherage@gardere.com
EPA Clean Power Plan and Impact on Texas and the Country Scott D. Deatherage 214-999-4979 sdeatherage@gardere.com United Nations 21 st Conference of the Parties United Nations Meeting on Climate Change
More informationENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. 40 CFR Part 52. [EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0783; FRL-9940-79-Region 6]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/11/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-33098, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
More informationCRS Report Summaries WORKING DRAFT
CRS Report Summaries R40147 Green Buildings This is a definition and analysis of the cost and benefits of green buildings. It also cites agencies and laws that encourage the building of environmentally
More informationConnecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Update on Climate Change Efforts Clean Power Plan and RGGI Program Review Discussion with Stakeholders Tracy Babbidge, Bureau Chief Energy
More informationWhite Paper. Understanding California s Electricity Prices
White Paper Understanding California s Electricity Prices Executive Summary Most industry experts predict that average electricity prices throughout the U.S. will increase significantly over the next decade.
More informationThe National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Comments on Proposed Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units and Notice of Data Availability
More informationEPA s Clean Power Plan and Reliability
EPA s Clean Power Plan and Reliability Assessing NERC s Initial Reliability Review PREPARED FOR Advanced Energy Economy Institute PREPARED BY Jurgen Weiss, PhD Bruce Tsuchida Michael Hagerty Will Gorman
More informationMATS and Boiler Rules
em feature MATS and Boiler Rules Practical, Data-Driven Standards by Gina McCarthy Gina McCarthy is Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. Environmental
More informationAlternative RE Approach Technical Support Document
Alternative RE Approach Technical Support Document 1.1. Introduction Renewable energy (RE) is a cost-effective approach for reducing carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions from fossil fuel-fired electric generating
More informationStatement for the Record. American Bankers Association. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. United States Senate
Statement for the Record On behalf of the American Bankers Association before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the United States Senate Statement for the Record On behalf of the
More informationFinal Report: Implications of EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan
Final Report: Implications of EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan Analyzing consumer impacts of the draft rule Report prepared for NASUCA November 14, 2014 AUTHORS Elizabeth A. Stanton, PhD Sarah Jackson Bruce
More informationNordea Asset Management. Our Approach on Climate Change
Nordea Asset Management Our Approach on Climate Change Introduction Scientific fact base The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report concludes that Climate change and
More informationTestimony of Jason Eisdorfer. In front of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Environment Friday, September 11, 2015
Testimony of Jason Eisdorfer In front of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Subcommittee on Environment Friday, September 11, 2015 Good morning, I am Jason Eisdorfer, Utility Program Director
More informationElectricity Sources. Coal Fleet
This paper is called Coal Facts because it provides factual information and data related to coal-based electricity. Most of the data are taken from independent third party sources, such as the Energy Information
More informationissue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc
issue brief Colorado s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution The Clean Power Plan, finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is a game changer because it sets the first-ever limits on carbon
More informationResidential & Commercial Sectors Overview CLIMATE
CLIMATE TECHBOOK Residential and Commercial Emissions in the United States Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data can be reported either by economic sector, which includes electric power generation as a separate
More informationUnderstanding California s Electricity Prices Updated April 2011
White Paper Understanding California s Electricity Prices Updated April 2011 Executive Summary Most industry experts conclude that average electricity prices throughout the U.S. will increase significantly
More informationClimate Change and. Environment Position. Statement. and 2017 Action Plan. action. Statement. Action Plan. September 2014
1 action September 2014 Westpac Group has a long-standing commitment to operating sustainably. 3 Helping future generations For us, this is about helping future generations live better lives in a healthy
More informationSaving energy: bringing down Europe s energy prices
Saving energy: bringing down Europe s energy prices Saving energy: bringing down Europe s energy prices By: Dr. Edith Molenbroek, Prof. Dr. Kornelis Blok Date: May 2012 Project number: BUINL12344 Ecofys
More informationERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update
ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update ERCOT Public October 16, 2015 ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update In August 2015, the U.S. Environmental
More informationCO 2 Emissions from Electricity Generation and Imports in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: 2012 Monitoring Report
CO 2 from Electricity Generation and Imports in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: 2012 Monitoring Report August 11, 2014 1 This report was prepared on behalf of the states participating in the second
More informationOctober 10, 2013. By Email Babatunde.Asere@state.de.us with Overnight Mail to Follow
NRG Energy Inc. 601 13th Street NW, Suite 850N, Washington, DC 20005 October 10, 2013 Mr. Babatunde Asere Air Quality Management Section Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division
More informationDocket No. OSHA-2013-0023 Proposed Rule to Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses
March 10, 2014 Via Electronic Submission: http://www.regulations.gov The Honorable David Michaels Assistant Secretary Occupational Safety and Health Administration U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution
More informationAn Economy-Wide Carbon Tax: Implications for Commercial Buildings
An Economy-Wide Carbon Tax: Implications for Commercial Buildings MARILYN B R OWN MATT C OX XIAOJING SUN N OVEMBER 2 9, 2 0 11 Table of Contents Federal Policy Option: An Economy-Wide Carbon Tax Experience
More informationEnsuring a Continued Policy for Promoting Renewable Energy U.S. Carbon Cap-And-Trade and Renewable Energy Certificates: A Preliminary Discussion
saines & jacobson 31 Ensuring a Continued Policy for Promoting Renewable Energy U.S. Carbon Cap-And-Trade and Renewable Energy Certificates: A Preliminary Discussion Richard Saines, Baker & McKenzie; REIL
More informationissue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution www.nrdc.org/policy www.facebook.com/nrdc.org www.twitter.com/nrdc
issue brief Nevada s Pathway to Cutting Carbon Pollution The Clean Power Plan, finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, is a game changer. It sets the first-ever limits on carbon pollution
More informationConnecticut Department of Environmental Protection. chris.nelson@po.state.ct.us and chris.james@po.state.ct.us
An Energy Agenda for the 21 st Century March 9, 2007 To: Regarding: Submitted Via Email: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection BCSE Recommendations for CT RGGI Pre-Proposal chris.nelson@po.state.ct.us
More informationfor a mid-sized commercial customer (50 KW load, 35% load factor, 12,600 kwh usage), New York s power premium is $884 month.
INTRODUCTION These comments are submitted on behalf of The Business Council of New York State, Inc. The Business Council is New York's largest statewide employer advocate, representing more than 3,200
More informationMEMORANDUM. TO: Greenpeace FROM: Point Carbon DATE: 9/10/09
MEMORANDUM TO: Greenpeace FROM: Point Carbon DATE: 9/10/09 SUBJ: Waxman-Markey (ACES 2009) Project Report Findings: As a whole, Coal receives significant financial funding under the allowance allocation
More informationFirst Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP HOUSE SPONSORSHIP
First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-0.01 Duane Gall x SENATE BILL 1-0 Cooke, Sonnenberg SENATE SPONSORSHIP (None), HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Senate Committees
More informationImplications of Carbon Cap-and-Trade for Electricity Rate Design, with Examples from Florida. Hethie Parmesano and Theodore J.
Implications of Carbon Cap-and-Trade for Electricity Rate Design, with Examples from Florida Hethie Parmesano and Theodore J. Kury Hethie Parmesano is a Special Consultant with NERA Economic Consulting
More informationEXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL POLICY TOOLS FOR EMISSION REDUCTION
Submission of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Sustainable Building Initiative (SBCI) to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention (AWG-LCA) 24 April
More informationThis document provides a summary of the major
F F A C T S H E E T June 2010 Summary of Major Energy Bill Provisions Of Importance to Public Power This document provides a summary of the major provisions of interest to public power electric utilities
More informationEnergy and Consumer Impacts of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity
Energy and Consumer Impacts of EPA s Clean Power Plan Prepared for the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity Contents Executive Summary Overview of the Clean Power Plan NERA Methodology Baseline
More informationThe role of local, decentralised energy solutions is too often overlooked in the context of current EU policy priorities to increase energy supply
The role of local, decentralised energy solutions is too often overlooked in the context of current EU policy priorities to increase energy supply security while attaining climate change goals. This presentation
More informationNatural Gas and the U.S. Fertilizer Industry
Natural Gas and the U.S. Fertilizer Industry Harry Vroomen Vice President, Economic Services The Fertilizer Institute July 15, 2010 www.tfi.org Outline of Presentation Brief Intro on Fertilizer Focus on
More informationGuidelines for Implementing Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, as Revised, FEMA-2015-0006, 80 Fed. Reg. 6,530 (Feb.
Regulatory Affairs Division Office of Chief Counsel Federal Emergency Management Agency 8NE, 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472-3100 Submitted via www.regulations.gov Re: Guidelines for Implementing
More informationPolicy Brief International Renewable Energy Investment Credits Under a Federal Renewable Energy Standard
Policy Brief International Renewable Energy Investment Credits Under a Federal Renewable Energy Standard Andrew Stevenson and Nigel Purvis* July 13, 2010 Key Findings Allowing regulated entities to comply
More informationMain Street. Economic information. By Jason P. Brown, Economist, and Andres Kodaka, Research Associate
THE Main Street ECONOMIST: ECONOMIST Economic information Agricultural for the and Cornhusker Rural Analysis State S e Issue p t e m b2, e r 214 2 1 Feed de er ra al l RR e es se er rv ve e BBa an nk k
More informationDriving Industrial Energy Efficiency Through Energy Tax Rebates
Industrial Energy Efficiency Driving Industrial Energy Efficiency Through Energy Tax Rebates Payoff for Efficiency Sweden s rebate program encourages voluntary energy efficiency improvements No Swedish
More informationCarbon Market California A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE GOLDEN STATE S CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAM
Carbon Market California A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE GOLDEN STATE S CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAM YEAR TWO: 2014 Executive summary Photo below: United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki Moon (center) with Sam
More informationGuidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power Generation 1
October 29, 2013 Guidance for U.S. Positions on MDBs Engaging with Developing Countries on Coal-Fired Power Generation 1 The following guidance is intended to be adapted by individual MDBs and incorporated
More informationChapter 11 Macroeconomic Assessment of Action Plan
Introduction Chapter 11 Macroeconomic Assessment of Action Plan There is a strongly positive overall economic impact from the group of recommendations presented in this report. Specifically, the net present
More informationMichigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy
Michigan Nuclear Power Plants Contribution to the State Economy PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Mark Berkman, Ph.D. Dean Murphy, Ph.D. September 2015 This report was prepared for Nuclear Matters. All results
More informationThe State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
STUART RABNER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY R.J. Hughes Justice Complex 25 Market Street PO Box 093 Trenton, NJ 08625-0093 Attorney for Plaintiff State of New Jersey, New Jersey Department of Environmental
More informationImplications of Technology Availability and Cost on Clean Power Plan Compliance Costs. Scott Bloomberg Vice President
Implications of Technology Availability and Cost on Clean Power Plan Compliance Costs Scott Bloomberg Vice President SBCA 2015 Conference, Washington, DC March 20, 2015 Abstract In this presentation, I
More informationComments on the Clean Power Plan
Comments on the Clean Power Plan Proposed Rule: Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Existing Electric Utility Generating Units Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 Submitted
More informationGUIDANCE ON STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) CREDITS FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM ELECTRIC-SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES
United States Office of Air and Radiation August 2004 Environmental Protection Agency GUIDANCE ON STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) CREDITS FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM ELECTRIC-SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY
More informationGreenhouse Gas Emission Reductions From Existing Power Plants:
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions From Existing Power Plants: Options to Ensure Electric System Reliability Susan F. Tierney, Ph.D. Analysis Group, Inc. May 2014 Table of Contents Introduction and Executive
More informationPOTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF A STRICTER OZONE STANDARD
POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF A STRICTER OZONE STANDARD July 2014 Overview A new study by NERA Economic Consulting and commissioned by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) reveals that a new
More informationGreenhouse Gas Offsets and Renewable Energy Certificates: Distinct Commodities in an Evolving Market The Climate Trust
Greenhouse Gas Offsets and Renewable Energy Certificates: Distinct Commodities in an Evolving Market The Climate Trust Introduction The framework for future climate policy is emerging in the United States
More informationPOWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO
Fact Sheet POWER SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: COLORADO MICHAEL OBEITER, KRISTIN MEEK, AND REBECCA GASPER CONTACT Michael Obeiter Senior Associate Climate and Energy Program
More informationNovember 6, 2012. The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702
November 6, 2012 The Honorable Richard Cordray Director Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20006-4702 Re: Integrated Mortgage Disclosures under the Real Estate Settlement
More informationNetherlands National Energy Outlook 2014
Netherlands National Energy Outlook 2014 Summary Michiel Hekkenberg (ECN) Martijn Verdonk (PBL) (project coordinators) February 2015 ECN-E --15-005 Netherlands National Energy Outlook 2014 Summary 2 The
More informationFixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks?
FACT SHEET AND ANALYSIS Fixing the Leaks: What Would it Cost to Clean Up Natural Gas Leaks? About the Authors: The study was designed, carried out, and written by Carbon Limits, a Norwegian consulting
More informationGHG Accounting Guidance Note Manufacture of Renewable Energy Climate Related Products
GHG Accounting Guidance Note Manufacture of Renewable Energy Climate Related Products IFC CLIMATE BUSINESS GROUP SEPTEMBER 2011 Introduction The following is an overview guidance for IFC investment staff
More informationCO 2 Emissions from Electricity Generation and Imports in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: 2010 Monitoring Report
CO 2 Emissions from Electricity Generation and Imports in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: 2010 Monitoring Report August 6, 2012 1 This report was prepared on behalf of the states participating
More informationPerspective of 18 States on Greenhouse Gas Emission Performance Standards. for Existing Sources under 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.
Perspective of 18 States on Greenhouse Gas Emission Performance Standards for Existing Sources under 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. Introduction As State Attorneys General, we believe it is critical to bring
More informationApril 12, 2011 BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION. Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-1090
BY ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION Elizabeth M. Murphy Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549-1090 David A. Stawick Secretary Commodity Futures Trading Commission Three
More informationCarbon Management Plan
E-2015-02-02 Addendum Carbon Management Plan Date: 14 May 2014 Owners: Approval: K.W.Bullimore & M.Sackett A.Burrell Executive Summary This document sets out the Carbon Management Plan (CMP) for The Open
More informationSaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World. Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives
SaskPower CCS Global Consortium Bringing Boundary Dam to the World Mike Monea, President Carbon Capture and Storage Initiatives 1 Purpose of Today A. CCS around the world B. What SaskPower is doing C.
More informationStatement for the Record
Statement for the Record Robert M. Blue President Dominion Virginia Power Enhancing Resilience in Energy Infrastructure and Addressing Vulnerabilities Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force April 11, 2014
More informationRe: FINRA Regulatory Notice 13-42: FINRA Requests Comments on a Concept Proposal to Develop the Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System
Ms. Marcia E. Asquith Office of the Corporate Secretary FINRA 1735 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Re: FINRA Regulatory Notice 13-42: FINRA Requests Comments on a Concept Proposal to Develop the Comprehensive
More informationSubcommittee on Energy and Power House Energy and Commerce Committee February 8, 2012. Darren MacDonald - Summary of Testimony
Subcommittee on Energy and Power House Energy and Commerce Committee February 8, 2012 Darren MacDonald - Summary of Testimony The steel sector is concerned about increased electricity costs and reliability
More informationStatement for the Record
Statement for the Record Kevin R. Hennessy Director Federal, State and Local Affairs New England Dominion Resources, Inc. Infrastructure Needs for Heat and Power Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force April
More informationa GAO-05-289 GAO ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE EPA Should Devote More Attention to Environmental Justice When Developing Clean Air Rules
GAO July 2005 United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and Operating Data Gathering REPLY COMMENTS Matthew M. Polka
More informationHow Does Coal Price Affect Heat Rates?
Regulating Greenhouse Gases from Coal Power Plants Under the Clean Air Act Joshua Linn (RFF) Dallas Burtraw (RFF) Erin Mastrangelo (Maryland) Power Generation and the Environment: Choices and Economic
More informationRenewable Choice Energy
Catawba College Table of Contents About Renewable Choice The Problem: Electricity Production Today The Solutions: Renewable Energy Sources Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) Who can participate in Renewable
More informationPage 1 of 11. F u t u r e M e l b o u r n e C o m m i t t e e Agenda Item 7.1. Notice of Motion: Cr Wood, Renewable Energy Target 9 September 2014
Page 1 of 11 F u t u r e M e l b o u r n e C o m m i t t e e Agenda Item 7.1 Notice of Motion: Cr Wood, Renewable Energy Target 9 September 2014 Motion 1. That Council resolves that the Chair of the Environment
More information