1 Interpretation Guideline ITALY Integrated Farm Assurance Control Points and Compliance Criteria MODULES: ALL FARM CROPS BASE FRUIT AND VEGETABLES Based on All Farm - V4.0-2_Mar13 Crops Base - V4.0-2 Mar13 Fruit and Vegetables - V4.0-2_Mar13 Valid from: 1 April 2015 Obligatory from: 1 July 2015
2 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION IFA Section: General Background Information Page: 2 of 130 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. What is a National Technical Working Group (NTWG)? Think Global, Act Local That s the philosophy at the heart of GLOBALG.A.P. s activities. And that s why GLOBALG.A.P. members have set up National Technical Working Groups (NTWGs) in several countries to help adopt GLOBALG.A.P. s universal standard on a local scale. National Technical Working Groups are established voluntarily by GLOBALG.A.P. members in countries where there is a need for clarification of implementation of GLOBALG.A.P. NTWGs identify specific local adaptation and implementation challenges and develop guidelines, known as National Interpretation Guidelines. These guidelines provide guidance to certification bodies and producers on how best implement and inspect (audit/check compliance) against GLOBALG.A.P. Control Points and Compliance Criteria at a national level. The working groups are also a valuable source of qualified information for GLOBALG.A.P. By tapping into national networks of experts and stakeholders, GLOBALG.A.P. gains extensive knowledge about the different legal and structural conditions that exist around the world. The NTWGs work in close cooperation with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat and the Technical Committees, which approve the guidelines developed by this growing number of groups. 2. What is a National Interpretation Guideline (NIG) and how is it developed? A National Interpretation Guideline (NIG) is a document, which provides guidance on the implementation and auditing the compliance(kp) of a country interpretation of the GLOBALG.A.P. Compliance Criteria () at a national level. The GLOBALG.A.P. Compliance Criteria are the base on which the country interpretation is developed. The GLOBALG.A.P. Control Points (CP) are fixed and are. The country interpretation in a NIG document is always in conjunction with the GLOBALG.A.P. CPs and cannot stand alone. Where there is no country-specific addition to the s which serves for better understanding and implementation, the original s are valid and should not be repeated in the country interpretation column.
3 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION IFA Section: General Background Information Page: 3 of 130 Once approved, the country interpretation of the compliance criteria shall be audited together with the GLOBALG.A.P. Control Points and Compliance Criteria., The country interpretation does not replace the original, but it is a clarification of the latter and is in addition to the GLOBALG.A.P. CPs. The NIG is developed by a National Technical Working Group and goes through a transparent approval procedure and a Peer Review with relevant stakeholders in the country. After approval, the National Interpretation Guideline becomes a normative GLOBALG.A.P. document. This implies that all Certification Bodies that are working in the respective country have to include this guideline within their certification procedures. GLOBALG.A.P. can withdraw or revise the National Interpretation Guidelines at any time on an individual point basis if global integrity of the standard is challenged. See GR V4.0-2 Part I 2. Normative Documents f) National Interpretation Guidelines
4 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION IFA Section: General Background Information Page: 4 of 130 How is the approval procedure for National Interpretation Guidelines structured? Similar to the GLOBALG.A.P. Benchmarking Procedure the steps for approval of a National Interpretation Guideline are as follows:
5 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION IFA Section: General Background Information Page: 5 of Submission: The NTWG submits the National Interpretation Guideline to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat ( to: for technical review and approval. It is recommended to check with the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat beforehand, which is the latest template for the respective NIG to be used. 2. Technical Review: The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat starts the internal technical review of the submitted guideline within two weeks after receiving the application. The GLOBALG.A.P. technical reviewer checks the guideline thoroughly in a timeframe of one month. If any technical or formal discrepancy is detected in this review, the guideline is returned to the NTWG, which has one month to propose the amendments. The GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat shall summarize all the consultation responses in an internal technical review report (ITR). This report shall evaluate the proposal of amendments, if any. After a second review, the GLOBALG.A.P. technical reviewer checks if the NTWG has implemented all comments. If there are additional comments, they will be sent to the NTWG within one month. The NTWG has again one month to implement the changes. 3. Peer Review: When the technical review requirements are met, the National Interpretation Guideline shall be subject to a peer review for a period of four weeks. The peer review shall be by written consultation with the relevant GLOBALG.A.P. stakeholders, GLOBALG.A.P. members and certification bodies in the respective country or continent. The consulted parties shall be invited to make written technical comments in English only and must provide justification. The comments shall be sent to If any technical or formal discrepancy is detected in this review, the guideline is returned to the NTWG, which shall have one month to propose amendments to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat. 4. Approval by TCs: A final peer review report shall be prepared by the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat, which shall summarize and evaluate the peer review comments and the proposals of amendments, if any. The final National Interpretation Guideline and peer review report shall be submitted to the relevant Technical Committee for provisional approval. The relevant Technical Committees shall make one of the following recommendations to the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat in their Technical Committee meeting or by written procedure: a. Guideline is recommended for approval b. Rejection of the guideline reasons given. 5. Final approval and publication: After the provisional approval of the Technical Committee(s), the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat finally approves the National Interpretation Guideline. The following steps are taken by the GLOBALG.A.P. Secretariat in order to inform all relevant stakeholders: Uploading the NIG and announcement on the GLOBALG.A.P. website
6 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION IFA Section: General Background Information Page: 6 of 130 Informing all GLOBALG.A.P. members in the relevant country Informing all GLOBALG.A.P. approved certification bodies in the relevant country Informing all accreditation bodies in the relevant country Uploading information on new interpretation guidelines to the CB Extranet and to the NTWG Extranet 6. What are the consequences after the approval and publication of a National Interpretation Guideline for: Certification Body All Certification Bodies have to confirm the receipt of the approved National Interpretation Guideline. Certification Bodies have to inform all their clients about the National Interpretation Guideline. All Certification Bodies that are operating in the respective country have to include the guideline in their certification procedure within three months after publication. After the period of three months, Certification Bodies can be sanctioned for not applying approved National Technical Interpretation Guidelines. The Producers There will not be major changes in the daily practice of the producers. The guideline will rather facilitate the implementation, as it is adapted to the national circumstances, legal regulations etc. Producers will be informed about the guideline via their certification bodies. Producers have to implement the GLOBALG.A.P. requirements in accordance with the National Interpretation Guideline within 3 months after publication. The Accreditation Bodies: All accreditation bodies have to confirm the receipt of the approved National Interpretation Guideline. Accreditation bodies have to make sure that all accredited certification bodies are applying the National Interpretation Guideline if they are certifying in the concerned country within three months after publication. After a period of three months Certification Bodies can be sanctioned for not applying approved National Interpretation Guidelines.
7 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 7 of 130 GLOBALG.A.P. IFA implementation at national level has to comply with the CP requirements and the additional country-specific interpretation by the NTWG. GLOBALG.A.P. IFA V4.0-2_MAR13 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF ALL FARM BASE Control points in this module are applicable to all producers seeking certification as it covers issues relevant to all farming businesses. AF. 1 SITE HISTORY AND SITE MANAGEMENT One of the key features of sustainable farming is the continuous integration of site-specific knowledge and practical experiences into future management planning and practices. This section is intended to ensure that the land, buildings and other facilities which constitute the fabric of the farm, are properly managed to ensure the safe production of food and protection of the environment. AF. 1.1 Site History
8 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 8 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Is a reference system for each field, orchard, greenhouse, yard, plot, livestock building/pen, and/or other area/location used in production established and referenced on a farm plan or map? Compliance must include visual identification in the form of a physical sign at each field/orchard, greenhouse/yard/plot/livestoc k building/pen or other farm area/location, or a farm plan or map that could be crossreferenced to the identification system. No N/A. A farm map can be sufficient, without physical identification of the fields / plot, if the map is enough detailed to identify (with no possibility of mistake) the crops / varieties / fields / plots. Also, on the map there must be sufficient element to establish the orientation of the fields, to give help to the auditor to orientate. In all options (map and / or physical identification of fields) the system adopted must be related, with no doubts, with the registration in the farm record sheet crop record form. Può essere sufficiente una mappa, senza identificazione fisica degli appezzamenti, purché tale mappa sia sufficientemente dettagliata per individuare senza possibilità di equivoco le colture / varietà / appezzamenti. Inoltre, sulla mappa devono essere presenti sufficienti elementi per consentire all'auditor di orientarsi. Qualunque sia l'opzione di identificazione scelta (mappa e/o identificazione fisica) il sistema adottato deve essere correlato, senza possibilità di equivoco, con quanto riportato sulla scheda di campagna AF Is a recording system established for each unit of production or other area/location to provide a record of the livestock/aquaculture production and/or agronomic activities undertaken at those locations? Current records must provide a history of GLOBALG.A.P. production of all production areas. No N/A. Usually, the referring document is the farm record sheet Normalmente, il documento di riferimento è la scheda di campagna AF. 1.2 Site Management
9 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 9 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Is there a risk assessment available at the initial inspection for all sites registered for certification? During subsequent inspections, a risk assessment for new or existing production sites where risks have changed (this includes rented land) is available. Does this risk assessment show that the site in question is suitable for production, with regards to food safety, the environment, and animal health where applicable? At the initial inspection a risk assessment is needed when the risks have changed or new sites are used. The risk assessment must be reviewed annually and must take into account site history and impact of proposed enterprises on adjacent stock/crops/environment (see AF Annex 1 Risk Assessment for basic information and AF Annex 2 for specific information on what must be covered). Requirement applicable in case of initial certification or in case of change of production sites and / or crops. Requisito applicabile in caso di prima certificazione o in caso di variazione dei siti produttivi e/o colture. AF Has a management plan been developed which establishes strategies to minimize the risks identified in the risk assessment (AF.1.2.1)? A management plan addresses the risks identified in AF describes the strategies which justify that the site in question is suitable for production. AF. 2 RECORD KEEPING AND INTERNAL SELF- ASSESSMENT/INTERNAL INSPECTION Important details of farming practices should be recorded and records kept.
10 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 10 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF. 2.1 Are all records requested during the external inspection accessible and kept for a minimum period of time of two years, unless a longer requirement is stated in specific control points? Producers must keep up-todate records for a minimum of two years. At least three months prior to the date of external inspection or from the day of registration, new applicants must have full records that reference each area covered by the registration with all of the agronomic activities related to GLOBALG.A.P. Documentation required of this area. For Livestock these records must go back at least one rotation before the initial inspection. No NA. Documents can be filed both in the farm or in other external offices (i.e. administration office) but must be readily available. In Option 2, part of the grower registrations and documents can be stored by the PMO. I documenti e le registrazioni possono essere conservati anche in uffici esterni (es. amministrazione) purché rapidamente disponibili durante l'audit. Nel caso di Opzione 2, parte di documenti e registrazioni possono essere conservati presso la PMO. AF. 2.2 Does the producer or producer group take responsibility to conduct a minimum of one internal selfassessment or producer group internal inspection, respectively, per year against the GLOBALG.A.P. Standard? There is documented evidence that in Option 1: an internal selfassessment has been completed under the responsibility of the producer; Option 2: an internal inspection of every member of the group and an internal QMS audit have been conducted under the responsibility of the producer group. No N/A. To fulfil the checklist refer to General Regulations Part Inspections can also be performed with a format different than the official check list or in an electronic format. In any case, the checklist used should include all the requirements of GLOBALG.A.P. checklist. Per la compilazione della check list fare riferimento al Regolamento Generale Parte Le ispezioni possono essere condotte anche con formato diverso rispetto alla chek list ufficiale ed anche in formato elettronico. In ogni caso le check list impiegate devono includere tutti i requisiti della check list GLOBALG.A.P.
11 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 11 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF. 2.3 Are effective corrective actions taken as a result of nonconformances detected during the internal self-assessment or internal producer group inspections? Necessary corrective actions are documented and have been implemented. No N/A. AF. 3 WORKERS HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE People are key to the safe and efficient operation of any farm. Farm staff and contractors as well as producers themselves stand for the quality of the produce and for environmental protection. Education and training will help progress towards sustainability and build on social capital. This section is intended to ensure safe practices in the work place and that all workers both understand, and are competent to perform their duties; are provided with proper equipment to allow them to work safely; and that, in the event of accidents, can obtain proper and timely assistance. AF. 3.1 Health and Safety
12 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 12 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Does the producer have a written risk assessment for hazards to worker health and safety? The written risk assessment can be a generic one but it must be appropriate for conditions on the farm. The risk assessment must be reviewed and updated when changes (e.g. new machinery, new buildings, new plant protection products, modified cultivation practices, etc.) occur. Examples of hazards include but are not limited to: moving machine parts, power take-off (PTO), electricity, excessive noise, dust, vibrations, extreme temperatures, ladders, fuel storage, slurry tanks, etc. No N/A. The risk assessment evaluation can be a generic one, elaborated by the PMO, by consultants or by growers' Organization. It must be appropriate for the conditions of the farm but can refer only the GLOBALG.A.P. certified activities. Il documento di valutazione del rischio può essere generico, elaborato dalla PMO, da consulenti o da organizzazioni di categoria. Deve essere appropriata alle condizioni dell'azienda ma può fare riferimento anche solo alle attività certificate GLOBALG.A.P.
13 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 13 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Does the farm have written health and safety procedures addressing issues identified in the risk assessment of AF.3.1.1? The health and safety procedures must address the points identified in the risk assessment (AF.3.1.1) and must be appropriate for the farming operations. They could also include accident and emergency procedures, and contingency plans, dealing with any identified risks in the working situation, etc. The procedures must be reviewed annually and updated when the risk assessment changes. The review of the health & safety procedures can be demonstrated by (alternative options): 1) Issuing a new version of the procedures or 2) Issuing a review Report (in such an option, the same document can include the review of whichever procedure that must be annually reviewed according to GLOBALG.A.P.) La revisione delle procedure relative alla salute e sicurezza può essere documentata (opzioni alternative): 1) Con la remissione delle procedure stesse; oppure 2) Con l emissione di un verbale di revisione (in questo caso, nel medesimo verbale può essere formalizzato il riesame di qualunque altra procedura per la quale GLOBALG.A.P. richieda una revisione annuale) or oppure
14 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 14 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed 3) Option 2: In case of homogeneous group of farms, the review of the procedures can be done and documented by the Producer Group (P.G.). If there are no changes in the procedures, it is not necessary to issue a new version. In any case the procedure must consider all the risks in the different farms. 3) Opzione 2: In caso di un gruppo omogeneo di aziende, la revisione delle procedure può essere fatta e documentata dal Gruppo di Produttori. Se non ci sono differenze nelle procedure, non è necessario di emettere una versione nuova. In ogni caso la procedura deve prendere in considerazione tutti i rischi in tutte le singole aziende. PLEASE NOTE: annual review means as a maximum 365 days between 2 revisions NOTA BENE: per annuale si intendono 365 giorni dalla revisione precedente AF Have all workers received health and safety training? Workers can demonstrate competency in responsibilities and tasks through visual observation. There must be evidence of instructions and training records. The producer may conduct the health and safety training if training records, and/or training material are available (i.e. need not be an outside individual who conducts the training). No N/A. The training must include also all the relatives that work in the farm carrying out GLOBALG.A.P. activities. La formazione deve includere anche i familiari lavoratori eventualmente impiegati in attività certificate GLOBALG.A.P.
15 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 15 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF. 3.2 Hygiene AF Does the farm have a written risk assessment for hygiene? The written risk assessment for hygiene issues covers the production environment. The risks depend on the products produced and/or supplied. The risk assessment can be a generic one but it must be appropriate for conditions on the farm and must be reviewed annually and updated when changes (e.g. other activities) occur. No N/A. The review can be demonstrated by (alternative options): 1) Issuing a new version of the risk assessment or 2) Issuing a review Report (in such an option, the same document can include the review of whichever procedure/risk analysis that must be annually reviewed according to GLOBALG.A.P.) PLEASE NOTE: annual review means as a maximum 365 days between 2 revisions La revisione della valutazione del rischio può essere documentata (opzioni alternative): 1) Con la remissione della valutazione stessa oppure 2) Con l emissione di un verbale di revisione (in questo caso, nel medesimo verbale può essere formalizzato il riesame di qualunque documento per il quale GLOBALG.A.P. richieda una revisione annuale) NOTA BENE: per annuale si intendono 365 giorni dalla revisione precedente
16 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 16 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Does the farm have documented hygiene instructions for all workers? The hygiene instructions are visibly displayed: provided by way of clear signs (pictures) and/or in the predominant language(s) of the workforce. At a minimum, the instructions must include: - the need for hand cleaning; - the covering of skin cuts; - limitation on smoking, eating and drinking to designated areas; - notification of any relevant infections or conditions, this includes sign of illness (e.g. vomiting; jaundice, diarrhea) whereby these workers shall be restricted from direct contact with the product and food-contact surfaces; - the use of suitable protective clothing. No N/A. In the case of written instruction / procedures, if the predominant language is a foreign one (not Italian language), the following alternative options are acceptable: 1) Instruction issued in the predominant language or 2) Instructions with clear signs / pictograms that illustrate the hygiene or accident/emergency instructions. Nel caso di istruzioni e procedure scritte, qualora il linguaggio predominante sia straniero (ovvero, non italiano), sono accettabili le seguenti opzioni alternative: oppure 1) Istruzioni nella lingua predominante 2) Istruzioni, con immagini chiare o pittogrammi che illustrano le norme igieniche e le istruzioni d seguire in caso di incidente/emergenza
17 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 17 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Have all persons working on the farm received basic hygiene training according to the hygiene instructions in AF.3.2.2? Both written and verbal training are given as an introductory training course for hygiene. All new workers must receive this training and confirm their participation. All instructions from AF must be covered in this training. All workers, including the owners and managers, must annually participate in the farm s basic hygiene training. The training must be documented: - issue, - Trainer / teacher - Date - Participants and signature. La formazione deve essere documentata: - Argomento, - Trainer/docenti - Data - partecipanti con firma. AF Are the farm s hygiene procedures implemented? Workers with tasks identified in the hygiene procedures must demonstrate competence during the inspection and there is visual evidence that the hygiene procedures are implemented. No N/A. This Control Point requires the auditor to verify the application of what stated in the hygiene instructions. This must be done preferably via visual evidences. If not possible, via questions to workers. In questo punto di controllo, l auditor deve verificare sostanzialmente che quanto scritto nelle procedure igieniche sia rispettato. Tale verifica, prioritariamente, deve essere effettuata con osservazioni visive. Quando non possibile, possono essere fatte domande ai lavoratori. AF. 3.3 Training AF Is there a record kept for training activities and attendees? A record is kept for training activities including the topic covered, the trainer, the date and attendees. Evidence of the attendance is required.
18 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 18 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Do all workers handling and/or administering veterinary medicines, chemicals, disinfectants, plant protection products, biocides and/or other hazardous substances and all workers operating dangerous or complex equipment as defined in the risk analysis in AF have certificates of competence, and/or details of other such qualifications? Records must identify workers who carry out such tasks, and show proof of competence, certificates of training, and/or records of training with proof of attendance. No N/A. For the handling with pesticide products (including preparing mixes), the document required is the "license" (Autorizzazione per l acquisto diprodotti fitosanitari). If this document is expired, the qualification remains valid as long as there is evidence that the renewal practice has been submitted before the expiry of the license. Per l impiego di fitofarmaci (inclusa preparazione miscele) il documento obbligatorio è il "patentino" (Autorizzazione per l acquisto di prodotti fitosanitari). Qualora questo documento sia scaduto, la qualifica resta valida purché vi siano evidenze che la pratica di rinnovo è stata inoltrata prima della scadenza del patentino. AF. 3.4 Hazards and First Aid
19 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 19 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Do accident and emergency procedures exist; are they visually displayed, and are they communicated to all persons associated with the farm activities? Permanent accident procedures must be clearly displayed in accessible, and visible location(s). These instructions are available in the predominant language(s) of the workforce and/or pictograms. The procedures must identify, the following - farm's map reference or farm address - contact person(s) - an up-to-date list of relevant phone numbers (police, ambulance, hospital, firebrigade, access to emergency health care on site or by means of transport, electricity and water and gas supplier). Examples of other procedures that can be included: - location of the nearest means of communication (telephone, radio) - how and where to contact the local medical services, hospital and other emergency services. In the case of written instruction / procedures, if the predominant language is a foreign one (not Italian language), the following alternative options are acceptable: 1) Instruction issued in the predominant language or 2) Instructions with clear signs / pictograms that illustrate the hygiene or accident/emergency instructions. Nel caso di istruzioni e procedure scritte, qualora il linguaggio predominante sia straniero (ovvero, non italiano), sono accettabili le seguenti opzioni alternative: 1) Istruzioni nella lingua predominante oppure 2) Istruzioni, con immagini chiare o pittogrammi che illustrano le norme igieniche e le istruzioni d seguire in caso di incidente/emergenza.
20 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 20 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed (WHERE did it happen? WHAT happened?, HOW MANY injured people?, WHAT kind of injuries? WHO is calling?) - location of fire extinguisher; - emergency exits; - emergency cut-offs for electricity, gas and water supplies; and - how to report accidents or dangerous incidents. AF Are potential hazards clearly identified by warning signs? Permanent and legible signs must indicate potential hazards (e.g. waste pits, fuel tanks, workshops, access doors of the plant protection product / fertilizer / any other chemical storage facilities as well as re-entry intervals, etc.). Warning signs must be present and in the predominant language(s) of the workforce and/or pictograms. No N/A. Farms producing fruits and vegetables. Warning signs must be placed at least the following points: pesticide storage, fertilizer storage and mixing pesticides site (if permanent), empty pesticide storage, oil storage. Fuel Storage. Re-entry intervals signs must be also displayed where applicable, according to the farm procedures. Aziende agricole produttrici di frutta ed ortaggi freschi. I segnali di pericolo devono essere posti almeno nei seguenti punti: deposito fitofarmaci, deposito fertilizzanti e luogo miscelazione fitofarmaci (se permanente), deposito vuoti fitofarmaci,deposito olio. Deposito carburante. I segnali degli intervalli di rientro devo essere apposti dove possible, secondo le procedure dell azienda.
21 INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE CP ALL FARM Section: All Farm Page: 21 of 130 Compliance Criteria () - not to be changed AF Is safety advice for substances hazardous to worker health available/accessible? When required to ensure appropriate action, information (e.g. website, telephone number, material safety data sheets, etc.) is accessible. Fresh fruit and Vegetables farm. The minimum requirement is the availability of safety data sheet. Electronic format (i.e. CD) is acceptable, but information must be promptly available (= a PC must be available) Aziende agricole produttrici di frutta ed ortaggi freschi. Il requisito minimo è la presenza delle schede sicurezza. Il formato elettronico (es. CD) è accettabile, purché le informazioni siano prontamente disponibili (= ci deve essere il PC) AF Are first aid kits present at all permanent sites and in the vicinity of fieldwork? Complete and maintained first aid kits (i.e. according to local recommendations must be available and accessible at all permanent sites and available for transport (tractor, car, etc.) to the vicinity of the work. It means the first aid kit in accordance with current legislation in Italy. Si intende il kit di PRIMO SOORSO conforme alla normativa vigente in Italia. AF Are there always an appropriate number of persons (at least one person) trained in first aid present on each farm whenever on-farm activities are being carried out? There is always at least one person trained in First Aid (i.e. within the last 5 years) present on the farm whenever on-farm activities are being carried out. As a guideline: one trained person per 50 workers. On-farm activities include all activities mentioned in the relevant modules of this standard. An official training course for "Primo Soccorso" ("First Aid") is required, by a qualified trainer. The course must be renewed every three years according to Italian law DM (every 5 years in South Tyrol). E' necessario un corso di "Primo Soccorso" ufficiale, tenuta da docente qualificato. Il corso deve essere rinnovato con cadenza triennale secondo normativa italiana D.M (ogni 5 anni in Sud Tirolo). AF. 3.5 Protective Clothing/Equipment
INTEGRATED FARM ASSURANCE ALL FARM BASE CROPS BASE FRUIT AND VEGETABLES CONTROL POINTS AND COMPLIANCE CRITERIA ENGLISH VERSION 4.0 EDITION 4.0-2_MAR2013 VALID FROM: MARCH 2013 OBLIGATORY FROM: JUNE 2013
General Regulations Part Ⅱ - Quality Management System Rules ENGLISH VERSION 5.0 VALID FROM: 1 JULY 2015 OBLIGATORY FROM: 1 JULY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. LEGALITY, ADMINISTRATION AND STRUCTURE... 3 1.1
Produce Safety Standard Control Points and Compliance Criteria English Version 4.0 Edition 4.0-2_Jul2013 Valid from: 24 July 2013 Obligatory from: 24 October 2013 This Produce Safety Standard only covers
1. Background for Changes The main reason for issuing Version 5.0-2 was the amendment in Compliance Criteria of 4.1.2 of the Fruit and Vegetables module. In the first edition of V5.0 it was indicated that
Produce Safety Standard Control Points and Compliance Criteria English Version V4.0_Aug2011 Valid from: 1 August 2011 This Produce Safety Standard only covers the food safety relevant points of the GLOBALG.A.P.
LEAF Marque certification of LEAF Producer Groups Quality Management system requirements 2009 Valid from 1 st January 2009 The LEAF Marque scheme aims to give consumers confidence in the care farmers take
GLOBAL GAP TABLE OF CONTENTS CranGAP Gras2p GLOBALGAP - Table of Contents AF=All Farm Base Procedure, CB=Crop Base Procedures FV=Fruit & Vegetable Procedures, GP=General Procedures, GF=General Forms TOC
ALL FARM BASE CROPS BASE FRUIT AND VEGETABLES CONTROL POINTS AND COMPLIANCE CRITERIA INTERMEDIATE LEVEL 1.0 BASED ON IFA V4.0-2 VALID FROM: NOVEMBER 2012 Control Points and Compliance Criteria Intermediate
11 Template for an environmental management system manual according to ISO 14001:2004 The main goal of an environmental management system is to continuously improve the environmental aspects arising from
BRC/IoP Global Standard Food Packaging and Other Packaging Materials A guide to the revisions contained in Issue 2 of the Standard The purpose of this guide is to help companies obtain a quick overview
GAP Training QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Girish Sarda Structure of Presentation Objective: To address various clauses of Quality Management System for group Certification (Option 2) as per Global GAP Standards
Quality Certification Services () Aquaponics GAPs Food Safety Standard for Growing and Harvesting Version 08/08/2014 Main Office Phone: 352-377-0133 Fax: 352-377-8363 Mail: PO Box 12311 Gainesville, FL
Copyright, Language, and Version Notice The official language of this [Certification Protocol] is English. The current version of the [Certification Protocol] is maintained on the Bonsucro website: www.bonsucro.com.
KIWIFRUIT GROWERS FOOD SAFETY SELF-AUDIT CHECKLIST California Kiwifruit growers can use this voluntary, self-audit checklist as a tool to conduct their own on-farm food safety risk assessment to determine
GLOBALG.A.P RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP) - GGN:4049928144348 Registration number of producer/ producer group (from CB):CSQA 1103P001 - - PROOF OF ASSESSMENT According to GRASP General Regulations
3.1.2 3.1.1 Introduction OH&S Management Systems Audit Checklist (NAT, E3) This audit checklist is based on Element 3 (Implementation) of the National Self-Insurers OHS Audit Tool. For a full copy of the
FSSC 22000 Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs PART II REQUIREMENTS AND REGULATIONS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES Foundation
Date(s) of Evaluation: CHECKLIST ISO/IEC 17021:2011 Conformity Assessment Requirements for Bodies Providing Audit and Certification of Management Systems Assessor(s) & Observer(s): Organization: Area/Field
GLOBALGAP Risk Assessment on Social Practices (GRASP) Checklist GRASP Assessment Result from the GRASP Project Document for public review until 26 March 2010 V 2.0 Feb 2010 English Version Producer: Signature:
Converting the stay permit from study to work Contents: 1. Before or after graduation? 2. Filling in the online forms 3. From student permit to employee permit 4. From student permit to independent worker
GLOBALG.A.P. RISK ASSESSMENT ON SOCIAL PRACTICE (GRASP) GRASP Checklist Version 1.3 Checklist Individual Producer (Option 1) Valid from: 1 July 2015 Mandatory from: 1 October 2015 HOW TO USE THIS CHECKLIST
DICHIARAZIONE DI PRESTAZIONE DECLARATION OF PERFORMANCE Ai sensi del REGOLAMENTO (UE) N. 305/2011 n. 16-1154-2013 1. Codice di identificazione unico del prodotto-tipo: Unique identification code of the
IAF Mandatory Document Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation of Management Systems Certification Bodies (IAF MD 17:2015) Witnessing Activities for the Accreditation Page 2 of 18 The (IAF) facilitates
1 of 12 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY Revision No. Date DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES Pages Affected By 00 01/07/2003 Draft Issued For Comment All HSEQ Dept. 01 01/09/2003 Total Change First Approved Issue All HSEQ
TESCO NURTURE SCHEME The Version known as TN 10 Issued January 2010 Tesco NURTURE TN10 Contents: : TN 10 Ch 1. Rational use of Plant Protection Products Plant Protection - Documentation Plant Protection
Workshop Self Inspection Checklist WORK01 General Mechanical Workshops Location Assessor Date This core checklist is provided by the Health and Safety Department as a template, which provides a basic framework
RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems November 2009 Approved by RSPO Executive Board 5 November 2009 1 History of Document These RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems are based on the outcome of the
Note : This form is designed for general use and may not be exhaustive. Modifications and additions may be necessary to suit individual projects and to address specific environmental issues and associated
Specific Requirements Certification scheme for Food Safety Systems in compliance with FSSC 22000 Organisation s SANAS No/s. Name of Certification Body Name of person observed Role in the audit: Type of
Change Document Version November 2011 versus Version November 2014 RSPO recently published a revised version of its Supply Chain Certification Standard and Systems document. Both documents are available
UTZ Certified Chain of Custody Checklist For Cocoa Version 3.1, June 2012 Introduction The UTZ Certified Checklist is a tool for organizations to evaluate their performance on compliance with the requirements
Sample Internal Food Safety Audit The purpose of this audit is for the Co-ordinator to conduct an assessment of hygiene standards in all aspects of the food handling procedures carried out in the facility
FOOD SAFETY SYSTEM CERTIFICATION 22000 FSSC 22000 Certification scheme for food safety systems in compliance with ISO 22000: 2005 and technical specifications for sector PRPs Features Foundation for Food
Converting the Stay Permit From study to work Content 2 1. Before or after graduation? 2. Filling in the online forms 3. From student permit to employee permit. 4. From student permit to independent worker
Wudinna District Council 1. Overview Wudinna District Council as part of its commitment under its Policy recognises its obligation to: Ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety
REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION BODIES TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE OF APPLICANT ORGANIZATIONS TO THE MAGEN TZEDEK SERVICE MARK STANDARD Foreword The Magen Tzedek Commission has established a standards and certification
Auditing Health and Safety Management Systems 4th Edition SafetyMAP: AUDITING HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 4th Edition Published by the Victorian WorkCover Authority Victorian WorkCover Authority
Based on the Article 88 item 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro I hereby issue THE DECREE ON PROCLAMATION OF THE LAW ON ORGANIC AGRICULTURE The Law on Organic Agriculture adopted by the
General Guidance for Developing, Documenting, Implementing, Maintaining, and Auditing an SQF System Module 2: System Elements SQF Code, Edition 7.1 M A Y 2 0 1 3 2013 Safe Quality Food Institute 2345 Crystal
GLOBLG..P RISK SSESSMENT ON SOCIL PRCTICE (GRSP) - GGN:4050373876753 Registration number of producer/ producer group (from CB):CSQ 3020P001 - - PROOF OF SSESSMENT ccording to GRSP General Regulations v1.1
Final Document As approved by RSPO Executive Board 25 November 2011 RSPO will transform markets to make sustainable palm oil the norm CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Scope... 3 3. How to use this document...
CERTIFICATO N. CERTIFICATE No. 18199/08/S SI CERTIFICA CHE IL SISTEMA DI GESTIONE PER LA QUALITÀ DI IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED THAT THE QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF GRUPPO SANITARI ITALIA S.P.A. S.S. 315 KM
GOOD LANDLORD CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PRIVATE RENTED SECTOR MANAGEMENT GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Each section contains general information on why the standard was set (Yellow text boxes). In many cases, the standards
NQF Level: 2 US No: 116122 Assessment Guide Primary Agriculture Control inputs and stock in agribusiness Assessor:.......................................... Workplace / Company:.................................
COMPANY PROFILE Metal Working S.r.l. is an innovative company with a clear view. From design to products manufacturing, Metal Working takes care of every aspect of production in its headquarter in Trentino,
Central Eyre Iron Project Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 24: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CHAPTER 24 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COPYRIGHT Copyright Iron Road Limited, 2015 All rights reserved This document
03 GLOBAL G.A.P. COMPLIANCE Version 4.0 A Family of Innovative Growers Reliably Supplying Great Tasting Healthy Berries Every Day! A Family of Innovative Growers Reliably Supplying Great Tasting Healthy
ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS REGISTER (ISO 14001) 1. Scope The scope of this Environmental Aspects Register covers the following operational areas: Aberdeen Region (A); Cumbernauld Region (C); Warrington Region
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SAFETY MANUAL HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT Effective October 15, 1995 Page 1 of 4 Updated August, 2008 Revised August, 2009 A. Columbus State Community College
SCS Global Services Manual Certification Manual for SQF Code Food and Agricultural Services (SCS-FAS) 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main +1.510.452.8001 fax www.scsglobalservices.com
MOUNT PELLON PRIMARY ACADEMY HEALTH AND SAFETY DOCUMENT OF POLICIES Date Reviewed: October 2015 Approved by Governors: Next Review Date: November 2015 September 2016 Contents Policy on Health and Safety
US SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY ASSURANCE PROTOCOL A Sustainability System That Delivers MARCH 2013 Since 1980, US farmers increased soy production by 96% while using 8% less energy US SOYBEAN SUSTAINABILITY
1. Overview The Port Augusta City Council as part of its commitment under its WHS Contractor Management policy, recognises its obligation to: Ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and
A Guide to the GAP Certification Process Preparing for the USDA GAP (Good Agricultural Practices) Audit Amber D. Vallotton Horticulture Agent VCE-Rockingham County 965 Pleasant Valley Road Harrisonburg,
Version 6.0 FSC36 SAFE FEED/SAFE FOOD: Guidance for Developing, Documenting, Implementing, Maintaining and Auditing the Program (Edition 6.0) PREFACE FSC36 SAFE FEED/SAFE FOOD: Guidance for Developing,
C162 Asbestos Convention, 1986 Convention concerning Safety in the Use of Asbestos (Note: Date of coming into force: 16:06:1989.) Convention:C162 Place:Geneva Session of the Conference:72 Date of adoption:24:06:1986
EHSMS10 Contractor and Supplier EHS Management Contractor Environment, Health and Safety Management Plan Purpose Guidelines Record Keeping This template provides an example to Santos Contractors of the
Food Defense Self-Assessment Checklist for Slaughter and Processing Plants Outside Security 1. What food defense measures does your plant have in place for the exterior of the building? Are the plant s
G1 This Food Safety Plan was developed in New York as an example for growers. Each grower must develop their own plan which fits their operation. This is a food safety and security program which incorporates
Environmental Management Plan This environmental management plan outlines Red Bus Services objectives and strategies for protecting the environment. This plan sets out how Red Bus Services intends to comply
UTZ Certified Chain of Custody For Cocoa Copies of this document are available for free in electronic format on the UTZ Certified Training Center website: http://www.utzcertified-trainingcenter.com/ If
F01(GGP)e(v10)-08/11 P a g e 1 INFORMATION FORM FOR GLOBALG.A.P. CERTIFICATION In order to establish an estimate adapted to your project, please fill out and sign this form and fax it to: +33.5.62.07.11.67
Version 3.0 (previous version 2.0 February 2010) Copies of this document are available for free in electronic format on the UTZ Certified Training Center website: http://www.utzcertified-trainingcenter.com
June 2010 HEALTH, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HSEMS) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PART I INTRODUCTION Corporate Health, Safety and Environment Policy.. 1 Purpose... 2 HSEMS Framework... 3 PART
OH&S MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHECKLIST - AS 4801:2001 (STATUS A = Acceptable; N = Not Acceptable; N/A = Not Applicable) 4.1 General Requirements 4.2 OHS policy Has the organisation an established and maintained
_ --- / ASEAN GREEN HOTEL Audit Checklist Nominee for Green Hotel Scope AuditTeam 1. 2. 3. Date of audit Requirement ndicators Criteria of audit Audit Guidance Rating Score Audit Findings Major Criteria
GFSI Overview (BRC, SQF & ) Timothy Newbold Manager, Food Safety and GFSI Education 2012 What is it really? The GFSI benchmarking document defines requirements for benchmarking process defines qualifications
GAP-ANALYSIS CROSS REFERENCE BETWEEN ISO/IEC 17020:2012 AND ISO/IEC 17020:1998 The principle standard used by International Accreditation Service (IAS) for the accreditation of Inspection Bodies is ISO/IEC
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS PROPOSTA DI POLIZZA La presente proposta deve essere compilata dall`amministratore o dal Sindaco della Societa` proponente dotato di opportuni poteri. La firma della presente proposta
Checklist Standard for Medical Laboratory Name of hospital..name of Laboratory..... Name. Position / Title...... DD/MM/YY.Revision... 1. Organization and Management 1. Laboratory shall have the organizational
Safety Statement for the Farm of Preparation date: January 2009 Revision date: January 2010 Signature: Position: Safety Statement outline This health and safety statement complies with the Safety, Health
Sample SUPPLIER AUDIT REPORT Supplier / Factory Name: Address: Date of Visit: Tel: Fax: Suppliers Representative(s) : Name Position 1 2 3 Company status: Products supplied: Comments: The suppliers signature
Introduction This document includes instructions for use and the answer key for the Implementing SQF Systems Practice Test. This Implementing SQF Systems Practice Test provides practice examination for
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND CRITERIA THE COCA-COLA COMPANY Agriculture is at the heart of the sustainability challenge. Population growth and increasing standards of living create additional
Quality Management System: Good Agricultural Practice (GAP) in Thailand QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE (GAP) IN THAILAND Surmsuk SALAKPETCH Chanthaburi Horticultural Research Center,
: 1 of 19 Table of Contents 1. Purpose 2. Scope 3. Unit of Certification 3.1 Identity Preserved, Segregation, Mass Balance, 3.2. Book and Claim 4. Definitions 5. Responsibilities 5.1 Head of the Certification
Responsible Supply of Fishmeal and Fish Oil Chain of Custody Standard A Tool for Voluntary Use in Markets for Products of Fishmeal and Fish oil Contents Page A Foreword... 3 B Principles of the Process.
Representing Agricultural and Amenity Contractors Code of Conduct January 2011 1. Introduction 1.1 This Code of Conduct is designed to promote professionalism amongst NAAC contractor members, encouraging
Introduction The company has planned, established, documented and implemented a food safety and quality management system for the site, which is maintained in order to continually improve its effectiveness