THE FVA-DVA PUZZLE: RISK MANAGEMENT AND COLLATERAL TRADING STRATEGIES
|
|
- Matthew Chandler
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE FVA-DVA PUZZLE: RISK MANAGEMENT AND COLLATERAL TRADING STRATEGIES CLAUDIO ALBANESE AND STEFANO IABICHINO Abstract. In the aftermath of the crisis, valuations of fixed income derivatives have significantly diverged from the principles of arbitrage-free pricing and the law of one price. Discrepancies arise because of the incompleteness of collateral trading markets which lack of reverse REPO contracts accepting OTC derivative receivables as collateral. This circumstance forces banks to implement sub-optimal funding strategies by borrowing unsecured and passing on their own credit spread to clients. In this paper, we propose that excess collateral on OTC books should be considered as an unstable source of funding, not fungible with bank debt. As a consequence, we define the FVA as a book level, non-transactional amount computed assuming that the rate for riskless lending is OIS as opposed to being the funding rate. With this definition, the FVA does not overlap with the DVA. We discuss analytics and strategies to manage FVA risk jointly with CVA, DVA and default loss risk. We also discuss market-completing collateral trading strategies to take advantage of the FVA-DVA funding arbitrage. 1. Introduction Dealers do not receive variation margin from counterparties to unsecured derivative transactions. However, as they turn around and hedge with other financial counterparties, they have the obligation to post collateral in the form of both variation and initial margin. Financing the resulting collateral gap is costly. If markets were complete, it would be possible to finance variation margin at REPO rates by posting OTC derivative receivables in reverse REPO transactions, see Burgard and Kjaer [5]. However, since the market infrastructure for reverse REPOs on OTC deals does not exist, banks need to finance collateral at their own unsecured funding spread. It is thus an interesting challenge to understand what contractual structures could robustly support a reverse REPO market for OTC derivatives. Credit risk and funding costs are intertwined. The Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) is the cost dealers pass to unsecured clients to account for the potential losses resulting from counterparty default risk. The Debt Valuation Adjustment (DVA) is the benefit dealers grant clients toward which they don t post variation margin, as a compensation for the risk that the dealer himself could default. The CVA and the DVA depend on netting agreements and are additive over netting sets. The CVA and DVA can also be interpreted as the value of mutual default protection contracts embedded in derivative transactions themselves, see [2]. The Funding Valuation Adjustment (FVA) is the cost of procuring collateral to post as variation and initial margin on derivative transactions to secured counterparties, net of the OIS interest received on the collateral posted. Most CSA agreements allow for the re-hypothecation Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Martin Engblom and Alan White for giving us feedback that helped us improve on earlier versions of this paper. We are also greatful to the extensive comments of three helpful referees. All remaining errors and misunderstandings are entirely the authors sole responsibility. 1
2 of variation margin. Collateral deficits at the book level are financed at the bank overnight funding rate. Burgard and Kjaer [5] argue that excess collateral positions can be used to buy-back bank debt and should thus give rise to a funding benefit at the funding rate. This conclusion relies on the assumption that OTC excess collateral can be considered as a stable form of funding which is entirely fungible with bank debt. In other words, the assumption is that the rate of riskless lending for a bank equals its funding rate. This assumption gives rise to what we refer to as the symmetric FVA and was first introduced by Pieterbarg [10] in a seminal article showing that the symmetric FVA is a transactional amount which can be valued by discounting payoffs at the funding rate. As pointed out by Hull and White in [7], assuming that the rate of riskless lending is anything else but OIS embeds arbitrage opportunities at the very core of derivative valuation. In this paper, we take the view that OTC excess collateral cannot be considered as a stable source of funding which is fungible with bank debt and assume instead that OTC excess collateral represent an unstable source of funding which earns interest only at the OIS rate. The resulting asymmetric FVA is neither a transaction specific concept nor a metric dependent on netting sets. It is a global metric that is meaningful only for the whole of a trading book across which re-hypothecation of variation margin is allowed. Unlike the CVA and DVA, the asymmetric FVA is not associated to a payoff and does not have an interpretation as the value of a financial contract. The Modigliani-Miller theorem [8] stipulates that the value of a bank is not affected by its funding strategies, i.e. the FVA should be rigorously valued as being worth zero to the bank, see [6]. More precisely, funding strategies for variation margin transfer wealth across the bank capital structure but keep constant the total value of the bank given by the sum of the value to shareholders and the value to bondholders. The asymmetric FVA of an OTC book can be interpreted as the amount of wealth transferred from shareholders to senior debt holders as a consequence of the funding strategy. Bank managers are faced with the very difficult challenge of devising a rebalancing strategy on behalf of shareholders to prevent or revert the wealth transfer to bond holders. Simple strategies are not effective, including selling protection on the bank itself or issuing new super senior debt without violating pari-passu rules. As we discuss in this paper, there are however collateral trading strategies involving third party investors that would work. Morini and Prampolini in [9] also point out that the FVA benefit resulting from the assumption that the rate of riskless lending equals the funding rate gives rise to an apparent double counting puzzle between the symmetric FVA and DVA. This conclusion does not extend to the asymmetric FVA which is orthogonal to and does not overlap with the DVA. Nevertheless, the asymmetric FVA and the DVA do have a few features in common. Firstly, also a non-zero DVA represents a transfer of wealth from shareholders to bond-holders as it is equivalent to a purchase of default protection on the bank itself, shifting cash flows from the bank before default to the bank after default when shareholders are wiped out. Secondly, if it was possible to reverse REPO OTC receivables at OIS rates, then bank managers could serve the interests of shareholders by posting back to unsecured clients, thus eliminating both the FVA for variation margin and the DVA together. Examples of transaction-specific transfer pricing formulas based on symmetric FVA are in Pieterbarg s paper [10]. In our opinion, the symmetric FVA is a faulty metric. However, transactional formulas have the merit of encapsulating a transfer pricing policy for funding costs. With asymmetric FVA, one can only look at the incremental cost in the background of a book of holdings. It appears that practitioners normally use transactional symmmetric 2
3 FVA formulas only as a guidance and not for book-keeping or hedging. In general, it is not possible to have a perfect match between revenue streams due to transactional FVA transfer pricing and realized portfolio total funding costs. Risk managing the funding costs/revenues mismatch necessitates a portfolio-level, risk-reward optimization analysis based on asymmetric FVA analytics. As we discuss in Section 2, FVA hedging is best accomplished holistically alongside the hedging of CVA, DVA and default losses. Because of this reason, it is fashionable among leading dealers to have a centrally managed XVA desk. Best strategies involve a combination of static positioning based on total return analysis and dynamic hedging based on sensitivities. Optimization can also be achieved by structuring transactions aimed at completing collateral trading markets with the intervention of third party investors and for which no wealth transfer occurs in the first place. These are strategies whereby collateral is supplied by third party investors absorbing first loss credit risk and providing liquidity, thus reducing or even eliminating XVA inefficiencies. As we discuss below, FVA funding arbitrage is best exploited by means of strategies involving two classes of investors. On one side, a margin lender arranges for investors to accept the credit risk of OTC portfolios by posting segregated general collateral as a guarantee to offset counterparty credit risk. By doing so, investors receive the CVA of the exposure and, unlike banks, don t suffer of CVA regulatory capital costs. Once segregated collateral in amount equal to variation margin is received by the bank to offset counterparty credit risk, the bank can then enter a nearly standard tri-party reverse REPO to upgrade the segregated collateral into cash to be posted to the hedge counterparties as variation margin. See also [2], [3] and [4]. The paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we quantify how to calculate and risk manage the FVA in today s incomplete collateral trading markets. In Section 3, we discuss the issue of wealth transfer across the bank capital structure and the resulting arbitrage opportunities. In Section 4, we introduce a stylised two-period model demonstrating how collateral trading strategies affect the asymmetric FVA and DVA and how they can both be reduced to zero. In Section 5, we outline the proposed collateral trading strategy in a real-life situation. Section 6 concludes. 2. Calculating the FVA The nature of OTC portfolio exposures is such that the net collateral position swings between situations where the collateral received is in excess of collateral posted and situations where the opposite happens. If there is a shortage of collateral, then the funding cost to procure it depends on the bank s own credit. Upon posting collateral the bank typically receives OIS. Hence, funding costs are measured by the funding spread over OIS. A key point in the analysis of funding costs is to decide how to quantify the rate for riskless lending in situations where hedges to unsecured OTC transactions generate an excess net collateral position. One view is that one could use excess collateral to buy-back bank debt in secondary bond markets and the rate for riskless lending should equal the funding rate, see [5]. Another view is that OTC books are an unstable source of funding which is not fungible with stable funding sources such as debt and the rate for riskless lending should be OIS. Accordingly, we have two definitions for FVA: the symmetric FVA is computed assuming that the rate for riskless lending of collateral equals the funding rate while the asymmetric FVA assumes that the rate of riskless lending is OIS. 3
4 The symmetric FVA is far easier to compute as it is a transactional amount, i.e. it is given by the sum of the symmetric FVAs for each individual transaction. As Pieterbarg showed in [11], the symmetric FVA of a single transaction can be computed by discounting future cash flows at the funding rate as opposed to the OIS rate. The asymmetric FVA at time 0 is defined as in the following formula: (2.1) Asymmetric FVA = E 0 [ 0 ( ( e t 0 rudu 1 τb >t max n VM n t, 0 ) s VM t + ( n IM n t ) ) ] s IM t dt. Here VM n t is the variation margin at time t due to the n-th netting set in the portfolio (counting posted margin as positive and received margin as negative) max ( n VMn s, 0) is the net excess variation margin required for the entire trading book n IMn s is the sum over netting sets of initial margins s VM t and s IM t are the spreads over OIS for variation and initial margin τ B is the default arrival time for the bank. The indicator function 1 τb >t reflects the assumption that a bank stops posting collateral upon defaulting If in this formula one omits initial margin and removes the max function, one obtains the symmetric FVA in [10] and [5]. As Piterbarg showed, the symmetric FVA is a transactional concept as it can be computed as the sum of values of individual transactions in which the discount rate is taken to be the funding rate. (2.2) Symmetric FVA = E 0 [ 0 ( e t 0 rudu 1 τb >t n VM n t ) ] s VM t. The DVA is sensitive to derivative payables, not receivables, and is linear across netting sets. [ ] (2.3) DVA = E 0 e t 0 rudu 1 τb >t max ( VM n t, 0) λ t dt. 0 where λ t is the probability rate of default of the bank at time t along a given scenario. The DVA is totally orthogonal to the FVA. There are situations where the asymmetric FVA is positive and the DVA is zero, when for instance a bank has a CSA agreement with all its unsecured counterparties that obliges it to post variation margin to all. There are also situations where the DVA is positive but the asymmetric FVA is zero, when counterparties post to the bank but the bank does post back. However, there is indeed an overlap between the DVA and the symmetric FVA, as was noticed also in [9]. Let us underline that in the definition of asymmetric FVA, we make use of OIS discounting as is normally done following the Fundamental Theorem of Finance when assessing the value of a stream of future cash flows. Exotic discount rules emerge in the analysis of the symmetric FVA but would not be consistent at portfolio level. A method for computing the asymmetric FVA is to simulate the collateral gap for an OTC trading book by evolving the price process of all unsecured netting sets while assuming that each unsecured transaction is hedged back-to-back. Since CSA agreements often include rating dependent triggers, one needs to evolve also the credit spreads of each counterparty. The asymmetric FVA is theoretically consistent with arbitrage free pricing but is much harder to compute than symmetric FVA or even the CVA. Since the CVA is additive across netting 4 n
5 Figure 1. Cumulative loss distribution due to counterparty defaults and CVA/DVA/FVA return distributions over monthly time intervals for the first year ahead sets, one can draw different scenario sets for each netting set. The asymmetric FVA instead requires shared scenarios across netting sets because of the possibility of re-hypothecation of variation margin. Furthermore, since collateral swings are very volatile, the time grid required to compute the FVA is much finer than the one required to compute the CVA within the same precision. The asymmetric FVA is best managed holistically together with the CVA, DVA and default losses. Since the risk profile is gamma negative and the execution of delta hedging replication is prone to leakage, static hedging strategies are a useful complement to delta hedging. The optimization of static hedging strategies necessitates nested simulation and the calculation of total return distributions for default losses, CVA, DVA and asymmetric FVA across time. A nested simulation for total return analysis typically requires generating hundreds of millions of scenarios and valueing the portfolio along each scenario a few hundred times. This is a remarkable technology challenge but is indeed possible if one makes use of the Mathematics and technology framework described in [1]. In Fig. 2 we show the graphs of the cumulative default loss distribution and the return distributions of CVA, FVA, DVA obtained with the methods in [1]. In Fig. 2 we show the total return distribution giving a complete 5
6 Figure 2. Total XVA return distribution including CVA, DVA, FVA and cumulative losses due to defaults over monthly time intervals for the first year ahead view of XVA risk. These graphs were obtained by running a nested simulation with 10,000 primary scenarios with 200 time points to 50 years, bifurcating off 2,000 secondary scenarios on a monthly frequency over the first year to revalue portfolio CVA, DVA and FVA. Cumulative loss distributions were also computed. The portfolio entails 50,000 fixed income trades and 2,000 counterparties, whereby each counterparty CDS curve is simulated along with all market factors and a multifactor credit-credit, credit-market and market-market correlation structure. Initial margin is simulated by valuing the value-at-risk for each netting set at each point in time of the simulation. 3. Impact of Collateral Strategies on the Capital Structure The asymmetric FVA arises from the lack of reverse REPO transactions with derivative receivables as collateral. Incompleteness per se does not invalidate arbitrage freedom and should not affect valuations. However, the asymmetric FVA arises because of a peculiar form of market incompleteness whose existence motivates sub-optimal behaviour and gives rise to macro-economic deviations from general equilibrium. To make an analogy, consider a firm wishing to finance a real estate purchase by using an unsecured loan instead of a mortgage. Unsecured funding lines have higher spreads but come with a peculiar advantage since the firm retains the title to the asset upon default. Holding the title benefits pre-existing debt holders as they have a priority claim on the asset over the unsecured lender. In other words, by the sake of entering into an uncollateralized transaction for asset acquisition, wealth is being transferred from shareholders to senior creditors. Banks have multiple classes of debt holders including depositors, bond holders, REPO counterparties and others. As a rule, asset acquisition by uncollateralized borrowing triggers wealth transfer across the bank capital structure, from equity holders to senior creditors. This is precisely what happens in OTC markets since there is no infrastructure for reverse REPO contracts 6
7 whereby OTC derivative receivables insured by CVA desks can be posted as general collateral to achieve a cash upgrade at OIS rates. Although a non-zero DVA does not measure an inefficiency similarly to the FVA, its existence is still intertwined with that of the FVA. The DVA arises because banks don t post collateral on out-of-the-money unsecured client transactions. The DVA is the cost of default protection the bank buys on itself from unsecured counterparties. The bank buys DVA by granting discounts at contract inception to unsecured counterparties and buys FVA by paying excess spreads to collateral lenders during the life of the transaction. However, if it was possible to reverse REPO an OTC derivative into cash, also the DVA would be zero as in this case the trading book would have no collateral shortage but only collateral surplus. In this situation, CSA restructuring whereby the bank posts back variation margin to clients would trigger a perfectly legitimate wealth transfer across the bank capital structure from bank bond holders to shareholders. The symmetric FVA would not be offset by the existence of reverse REPO transactions as the symmetric FVA would still embed a benefit generated by scenarios with net derivative payables. This is yet another indication of the spurious arbitrage opportunities arising from the symmetric definition of FVA whereby the rate of riskless lending is above OIS. Capital structure arguments are also useful to understand counterparty behaviour. Bank counterparties can be roughly divided into two categories: those which are rich of high quality collateral and those which aren t. Counterparties with collateral on their balance sheets have an interest to post as much as possible to derivative counterparties as this would decrease their DVA (i.e. the bank CVA) and transfer wealth to their shareholders. Other classes of counterparties such as corporates do not own high quality collateral on their balance sheet but instead require derivatives for the purpose of project financing. Such counterparties typically have a preference not to book derivatives on a mark-to-market basis and to deploy liquid resources for project financing as opposed to pledge collateral. The corporates preference to enter unsecured transactions is exactly the opposite of the banks preference. One should emphasize that the funding preferences of firms that do not wish to post high quality collateral could still be met if a third party which is collateral rich were to post guarantees on their behalf. Guarantees are preferable to collateral assets because they don t appear as debt on the firms balance sheet. 4. A Two Period Toy-Model The objective of this section is to analyse in detail the form of market incompleteness at the root of a non-vanishing asymmetric FVA. For simplicity s sake, we consider a two period model with a start date t 0 in the past, a valuation date t 1 representing current time and a time horizon t 2 in the future. The commercial bank CB and unsecured counterparty UC enter in an unsecured derivative transaction struck at equilibrium at time t 0. CB hedges its derivative exposure to UC on a back-to-back basis with either an investment bank IB or an exchange CCP. The bank CB is then left with the obligation to post variation margin to either the investment bank IB or to the exchange CCP in a cash amount matching at all times the mark-to-market valuation of the derivative. Counterparty credit risk for UC is retained by the commercial bank CB. IB and CCP receive collateral and are immunized with respect to credit risk. We assume that the unsecured counterparty UC is a going concern at current time t 1 but might possibly default at time t 2. The change of mark-to-market value from time t 0 to time t 1 triggers collateral posting obligations as collateral amounts need to be updated. At time t 2, a 7
8 Figure 3. Unsecured collateral borrowing second update of variation margin is required and we need to consider the possibility that the unsecured counterparty UC defaults in the interim. In the following two subsections, we analyse our toy model with two time periods. For simplicity s sake, we neglect gap risk and initial margin. The unsecured collateral strategy is represented in Figure 3 while the secured one is represented in Figure Strategy 1: unsecured collateral borrowing. We assume that the commercial bank CB is a legal entity entailing a trading desk TD, a CVA desk and an FVA desk. The trading desk TD underwrites a derivative transaction with the unsecured counterparty UC. For simplicity s sake, we assume that the transaction makes reference to a CSA agreement whereby the parties post collateral to each other only for the variation margin in excess of a pre-set trigger level depending on the credit of either party. At the start date t 0, the transaction is at equilibrium and TD buys default protection from the internal CVA desk against the default of UC. The unsecured counterparty UC pays to TD the fair value of the derivative in addition to the CVA and FVA price adjustments. In addition, the unsecured counterparty receives DVA in the form of a discount on the transaction price at inception. At start time t 0, the trading desk TD: hedges the transaction with an offsetting trade with the hedge counterparty HC, which can either be an investment bank or a CCP; buys counterparty credit risk protection on itself by paying DVA to the unsecured counterparty UC; buys counterparty risk protection from the CVA desk internal at TD by passing the CVA premium received from the unsecured counterparty; no collateral is posted as the transaction is initially at equilibrium at time t 0. At current time t 1, assuming as we explained that the unsecured counterparty UC is not in a state of default, the trading desk TD does the following: 8
9 if the fair value of the derivative transaction to UC at time t 1 is negative, then CB receives variation margin from the hedge counterparty HC and keeps it on its balance sheet, without handing it over to UC; if the fair value of the derivative transaction to UC at time t 1 is positive, then the FVA desk of CB borrows variation margin on an uncollateralized basis at the credit spread of the bank CB and posts it to the hedge counterparty HC. HC pays to CB the interest on variation margin at risk free rate (OIS). At current time t 2, the trading desk TD acts as follows: In case neither the unsecured counterparty UC nor the bank are in a state of default, then variation margin is updated as it had been at time t 1 ; In case the unsecured counterparty UC happens to be in a state of default at time t 2 while the bank CB is a going concern and the transaction is in-the-money for the bank, then: the CVA desk pays the transaction value to the desk TD; the trading desk TD closes the transaction with the hedge counterparty that keeps variation margin; TD closes the loan from the FVA desk with the funds received from the CVA desk; In case the unsecured counterparty UC happens to be in a state of default at time t 2 while the bank CB is a going concern and the transaction is out-the-money for the bank, then the trading desk TD closes the transaction with the hedge counterparty and pays the received margin to the liquidator of the unsecured counterparty UC. In case the bank CB happens to be in a state of default at time t 2 while the unsecured counterparty UC and the transaction is in-the-money for the bank CB, then: the unsecured counterparty UC novates the transaction with another bank, receives fair value from the novation counterparty and passes it on to the liquidator of CB; the hedge counterparty HC novates the transaction while keeping the variation margin received; CB liquidators distribute the proceeds from UC to the universe of all its debt holders in order of seniority, not favouring collateral lenders unless their contract explicitly states otherwise. As a consequence collateral lenders have a limited recovery R ULC (V M) +. In case the bank CB happens to be in a state of default at time t 2 while the unsecured counterparty UC is not and the transaction is out-of-the-money for the bank CB, then: the unsecured counterparty UC novates the transaction with another bank by paying the fair value of the transaction in case UC is out-of-the-money; the hedge counterparty HC novates the transaction and CB keeps the variation margin received from HC; CB liquidators distribute the cash collateral from the hedge counterparty HC to the universe of all its debt holders in order of seniority, not favouring the derivative counterparty UC unless their contract explicitly states otherwise. As a consequence, the derivative counterparty has a limited recovery R UC (V M). In case the bank CB and the unsecured counterparty UC are both in a state of default at time t 2, then: the hedge counterparty HC novates the transaction while keeping the variation margin received; 9
10 the bank CB liquidates the defaulted derivative assets and distributes the proceeds to the universe of all its debt holders in order of seniority (not favouring collateral lenders unless their contract explicitly states otherwise); derivative transaction between CB and the unsecured counterparty UC give rise to recovery rights that need to be identified and settled during the bankruptcy process. Figure 4. Secured collateral borrowing 4.2. Strategy 2: secured collateral borrowing. The setup of this scenario is similar to that of the previous case except for a key difference: at start time t 0, the trading desk TD buys default protection not from the internal CVA desk but from an external margin lender ML which accepts the obligation to post segregated collateral on behalf of the unsecured counterparty UC in an amount equal to the fair value of the transaction at all times. At current time t 1, assuming that the unsecured counterparty UC is not in a state of default, the FVA desk funds the variation margin required by the hedge counterparty by entering into a reverse REPO transaction to transform the segregated collateral posted by ML into overnight cash. The rate for upgrade to cash is the prevailing REPO rate for GC collateral. Since the GC REPO rate and OIS are separated by a very small spread of a few basis points, the cost of the cash upgrade to the FVA desk is nearly offset by interest rate receipts from the hedge transaction counterparty HC which pays OIS. At current time t 2, the trading desk TD does the following: In case, the unsecured counterparty UC is not in a state of default, then variation margin is updated; In case the unsecured counterparty UC happens to be in a state of default while the bank is not defaulted, then: the margin lender ML liquidates the segregated collateral and the FVA desk makes whole the reverse REPO counterparty with these funds; the trading desk TD closes the transaction with the hedge counterparty by allowing them to keep the variation margin. 10
11 In case the bank CB happens to be in a state of default at time t 2 while the unsecured counterparty UC is not defaulted, then: the unsecured counterparty UC novates the transaction with another bank by either passing the variation margin received or instructing the margin lender ML to re-post the segregated collateral to the novating bank; the hedge counterparty HC novates the transaction while keeping the variation margin received. In case the bank CB and the unsecured counterparty UC both default at time t 2, then: the hedge counterparty HC novates the transaction while keeping the variation margin received; the margin lender ML liquidates segregated collateral in an amount equal to the fair value of the derivative transaction and makes the counterparty of the reverse REPO transaction whole. 5. Strategy implementations A real life strategy along the lines discussed in this paper is illustrated in Figure 4. In an efficient and realistic implementation, instead of configuring the CVA desk as an internal operation, one would have a margin lender as an arm s length financial entity that sells insurance to trading desks. The margin lender backs up the default protection with collateral in full for a pool of names, up to a cap negotiated with the bank. The bank would then lend cash as needed to cover the excess amount whenever needed, with the understanding that the margin lender would still cover all losses arising from default up to the cap. Margin lending for OTC contracts can be structured over various maturities. We believe that the most efficient structuring strategies involve rather short maturities of around 6 months as one needs to accommodate for the natural flow of positions. In this situation, the margin borrower is liable for the payment of floating CVA premia which are linked to its credit spread (or a proxy thereof) and the expected amount of collateral required. The CVA volatility risk can be ameliorated by negotiating caps on the CVA floating payments. Since margin lending eliminates both the cost of CVA regulatory capital and the cost of FVA and since long term CVA is typically well in excess to short term CVA, even striking a cap at the current level of cumulative CVA and FVA fees would result in a substantial reduction in running spreads for the client. Initial margin that the counterparty needs to post can also be reduced at the condition that the margin lender accepts to post collateral past the time of default and until the close-out process and liquidation is completed. This assumes that the margin lender providing variation margin is a fully collateralized pass-through vehicle with potential liabilities matched by his collateral assets up to a cap and that the bank accepts the risk liabilities may exceed the cap. Reducing initial margin posting obligations by the bank and the FVA for variation margin cannot be achieved by a third party margin lender focused on providing collateral to counterparties. However, relief could be obtained by means of a segregated liquidation fund selling globally capped gap risk protection to all bank counterparties. In this paper, we focused exclusively on bilateral derivative transactions. However, most constructions and concepts extend and apply to the multi-lateral case whereby CB is replaced by a Central Counterparty Clearing House or CCP. From a regulatory angle, we believe that banks would obtain capital relief within current regulations if this scheme were implemented. The key consideration is that this scheme involves 11
12 repapering CSA agreements in such a way to oblige counterparties to post variation margin, while allowing them to rent the collateral from investors that would post it on their behalf through a combination of segregated funds and cash upgrades. Failure to post collateral by counterparties would trigger a failure to pay condition and a default event. 6. Conclusions We introduced the asymmetric FVA as metric for funding costs to procure variation and initial margin for OTC books. The asymmetric is a book level metric which, unlike the more commonly used symmetric FVA, has no overlap with the DVA. A non-vanishing asymmetric FVA is the indication of existence of funding arbitrage. Whenever a dealer raises unsecured collateral under its own credit, it generates spurious payoffs after the bank default, thus transfering wealth across its capital structure from shareholders to bond holders. Further transfering costs to clients reduces macro-economic welfare. In this paper, we discuss market-completing collateral trading strategies based on margin lending that theoretically reduce the asymmetric FVA due to variation margin possibly down to a theoretical limit of zero. Once a market infrastructure for such strategies is established, derivative markets will be more efficient, the law of one price will be restored and risk neutral valuation at OIS discounting will again prevail. References [1] C. Albanese, T. Bellaj, G. Gimonet, and G. Pietronero. Coherent Global Market Simulations and Securitization Measures for Counterparty Credit Risk. Quantitative Finance, 11-1:1 20, [2] C. Albanese, D. Brigo, and Frank Oertel. Restructuring Counterparty Credit Risk. SSRN: or accepted for publication on IJTAF and on the Working Paper Series of the Deutsche Bundesbank, [3] C. Albanese and G. Pietronero. A Redesign for Central Clearing. Credit Flux, August, [4] C. Albanese, G. Pietronero, and S. White. Optimal Funding Strategies for Counterparty Credit Risk Liabiliies. Available at SSRN: April 18, [5] C. Burgard and M. Kjaer. Partial Differential Equation Representations of Derivatives with Counterparty Risk and Funding Costs. Journal of Credit Risk 7(3), pages 119, [6] J. Hull and A. White. Is FVA a Cost for Derivatives Desks? Risk, pages 83 85, [7] J. Hull and A. White. Valuing Derivatives: Funding Value Adjustments and Fair Value. preprint, [8] F. Modigliani and M. Miller. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. Economic Review, 48: , [9] M. Morini and A. Prampolini. Risky Funding: A Unified Framework for Counterparty and Liquidity Charges. Risk Magazine, March, [10] V. Piterbarg. Funding beyond discounting: collateral agreements and derivatives pricing. Risk Magazine, pages , [11] V. Piterbarg. Funding Beyond Discounting: Collateral Agreements and Derivatives Pricing. Risk Magazine, February, address: claudio.albanese@global-valuation.com Global Valuation Limited, London, EC2M 4YF, UK address: stefano.iabichino@global-valuaiton.com Global Valuation Limited, London, EC2M 4YF, UK 12
The xva Challenge. Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral and Capital. Third Edition. Jon Gregory
The xva Challenge Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral and Capital Third Edition Jon Gregory WILEY Contents List of Spreadsheets List of Appendices Acknowledgements About the Author xix xxi xxiii
More informationLIBOR vs. OIS: The Derivatives Discounting Dilemma
LIBOR vs. OIS: The Derivatives Discounting Dilemma John Hull PRMIA May 2012 1 Agenda OIS and LIBOR CVA and DVA The Main Result Potential Sources of Confusion FVA and DVA See John Hull and Alan White: LIBOR
More informationBlack Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869. Words: 3441
Black Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869 Words: 3441 1 1. Introduction In this paper I present Black, Scholes (1973) and Merton (1973) (BSM) general
More informationCommercial paper collateralized by a pool of loans, leases, receivables, or structured credit products. Asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP)
GLOSSARY Asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) Asset-backed security (ABS) Asset-backed securities index (ABX) Basel II Call (put) option Carry trade Collateralized debt obligation (CDO) Collateralized
More informationFinancial Research Advisory Committee Liquidity and Funding Working Group. August 1, 2013
Financial Research Advisory Committee Liquidity and Funding Working Group August 1, 2013 Executive Summary Overview The Liquidity and Funding Working Group of the FSRM focused its work efforts around the
More informationTools for Mitigating Credit Risk in Foreign Exchange Transactions 1
Tools for Mitigating Credit Risk in Foreign Exchange Transactions November 2010 Introduction In November 2009, the Foreign Exchange Committee (FXC) and its Buy-Side Subcommittee released a paper that reviewed
More informationNew valuation and pricing approaches for derivatives in the wake of the financial crisis
FINANCIAL SERVICES New valuation and pricing approaches for derivatives in the wake of the financial crisis Moving towards a new market standard? October 2011 kpmg.com Contents 1. A new valuation and pricing
More informationGeneral Forex Glossary
General Forex Glossary A ADR American Depository Receipt Arbitrage The simultaneous buying and selling of a security at two different prices in two different markets, with the aim of creating profits without
More informationFVA Putting Funding into the Equation
0 FVA PUTTING FUNDING INTO THE EQUATION FINANCIAL SERVICES FVA Putting Funding into the Equation Some practical implications of post crisis thinking on the place of funding costs in the management of a
More informationCollateral Management Best Practices for Broker-Dealers
Banking & Securities Collateral Management Best Practices for Broker-Dealers Jeff Penney Collateral Management Best Practices for Broker-Dealers 1 col lat er al (noun) something pledged as security for
More informationCVA in Derivatives Trading
CVA in Derivatives Trading Jakob Sidenius Model Development NORDEA Seminar at FRIC, CBS, 5 November 2013 1/33 Talk overview Counterparty risk and mitigation CVA and DVA: definition, meaning and computation
More informationBASICS OF CREDIT VALUE ADJUSTMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HEDGE EFFECTIVENESS
BASICS OF CREDIT VALUE ADJUSTMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HEDGE EFFECTIVENESS This is the third paper in an ongoing series that outlines the principles of hedge accounting under current
More informationDataline A look at current financial reporting issues
Dataline A look at current financial reporting issues No. 2013-25 December 10, 2013 What s inside: Overview...1 Background... 2 OIS discounting an illustration... 3 Implications for market participants...
More informationLOCKING IN TREASURY RATES WITH TREASURY LOCKS
LOCKING IN TREASURY RATES WITH TREASURY LOCKS Interest-rate sensitive financial decisions often involve a waiting period before they can be implemen-ted. This delay exposes institutions to the risk that
More informationHow credit analysts view and use the financial statements
How credit analysts view and use the financial statements Introduction Traditionally it is viewed that equity investment is high risk and bond investment low risk. Bondholders look at companies for creditworthiness,
More informationCommercial paper collateralized by a pool of loans, leases, receivables, or structured credit products.
Asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) Asset-backed security (ABS) Asset-backed securities index (ABX) Auction rate security Basel II Call (put) option Carry trade Commercial paper collateralized by a pool
More informationManagers Directive AIFs. Issued :
Information page Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive AIFMs managing leveraged AIFs Issued : 7t May 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. General provisions applicable to AIFs using
More informationCVA, Hedging and Best Practices Denny Yu, CFA
CVA, Hedging and Best Practices Denny Yu, CFA February 28, 2012 Agenda CVA and the trading desk Hedging of CVA risk Best practices in CVA solutions CVA Impact on the Trading Desk Definitions Potential
More informationFixed Income Portfolio Management. Interest rate sensitivity, duration, and convexity
Fixed Income ortfolio Management Interest rate sensitivity, duration, and convexity assive bond portfolio management Active bond portfolio management Interest rate swaps 1 Interest rate sensitivity, duration,
More informationCHAPTER 22: FUTURES MARKETS
CHAPTER 22: FUTURES MARKETS PROBLEM SETS 1. There is little hedging or speculative demand for cement futures, since cement prices are fairly stable and predictable. The trading activity necessary to support
More informationFundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9
Answers Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9 Financial Management December 2008 Answers 1 (a) Rights issue price = 2 5 x 0 8 = $2 00 per share Theoretical ex rights price = ((2 50 x 4) + (1 x 2 00)/5=$2
More informationRules Notice Request for Comment. Summary of nature and purpose of proposed Rule
Rules Notice Request for Comment Dealer Member Rules Contact: Answerd Ramcharan Specialist, Member Regulation Policy 416 943-5850 aramcharan@iiroc.ca Please distribute internally to: Credit Institutional
More informationI. Introduction. II. Financial Markets (Direct Finance) A. How the Financial Market Works. B. The Debt Market (Bond Market)
University of California, Merced EC 121-Money and Banking Chapter 2 Lecture otes Professor Jason Lee I. Introduction In economics, investment is defined as an increase in the capital stock. This is important
More informationEDF CEA Inria School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management
C2 RISK DIVISION EDF CEA Inria School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management EDF CEA INRIA School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management Regulatory rules evolutions and internal models
More informationHow To Sell A Callable Bond
1.1 Callable bonds A callable bond is a fixed rate bond where the issuer has the right but not the obligation to repay the face value of the security at a pre-agreed value prior to the final original maturity
More informationFinancial Economics and Canadian Life Insurance Valuation
Report Financial Economics and Canadian Life Insurance Valuation Task Force on Financial Economics September 2006 Document 206103 Ce document est disponible en français 2006 Canadian Institute of Actuaries
More informationFIN 684 Fixed-Income Analysis From Repos to Monetary Policy. Funding Positions
FIN 684 Fixed-Income Analysis From Repos to Monetary Policy Professor Robert B.H. Hauswald Kogod School of Business, AU Funding Positions Short-term funding: repos and money markets funding trading positions
More informationt = 1 2 3 1. Calculate the implied interest rates and graph the term structure of interest rates. t = 1 2 3 X t = 100 100 100 t = 1 2 3
MØA 155 PROBLEM SET: Summarizing Exercise 1. Present Value [3] You are given the following prices P t today for receiving risk free payments t periods from now. t = 1 2 3 P t = 0.95 0.9 0.85 1. Calculate
More informationRisk Warning Notice. Introduction
First Equity Limited Salisbury House London Wall London EC2M 5QQ Tel 020 7374 2212 Fax 020 7374 2336 www.firstequity.ltd.uk Risk Warning Notice Introduction You should not invest in any investment product
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently Asked Questions on Basel III s January 2013 Liquidity Coverage Ratio framework
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently Asked Questions on Basel III s January 2013 Liquidity Coverage Ratio framework April 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org).
More informationMargin requirements for certain cash and security borrowing and lending arrangements - Amendments to Schedules 1, 7 and 7A of Dealer Member Form 1
Rules Notice Notice of Approval/Implementation Dealer Member Rules Contact: Answerd Ramcharan Manager, Financial Information, Member Regulation Policy 416 943-5850 aramcharan@iiroc.ca Please distribute
More informationAccounting and Reporting Treatment for Repurchase/Reverse Repurchase Agreements Over 1 Year in Duration. May 2014
Accounting and Reporting Treatment for Repurchase/Reverse Repurchase Agreements Over 1 Year in Duration May 2014 Agenda Executive Summary Background on Repo Agreements What is a Repo Agreement? Use of
More informationShould Banks Trade Equity Derivatives to Manage Credit Risk? Kevin Davis 9/4/1991
Should Banks Trade Equity Derivatives to Manage Credit Risk? Kevin Davis 9/4/1991 Banks incur a variety of risks and utilise different techniques to manage the exposures so created. Some of those techniques
More informationIFRS Practice Issues for Banks: Loan acquisition accounting
IFRS Practice Issues for Banks: Loan acquisition accounting August 2011 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents 1. Addressing complexity in loan acquisitions 1 2. When should the acquisition of a loan be recognised in
More informationEC372 Bond and Derivatives Markets Topic #5: Options Markets I: fundamentals
EC372 Bond and Derivatives Markets Topic #5: Options Markets I: fundamentals R. E. Bailey Department of Economics University of Essex Outline Contents 1 Call options and put options 1 2 Payoffs on options
More informationFIN 500R Exam Answers. By nature of the exam, almost none of the answers are unique. In a few places, I give examples of alternative correct answers.
FIN 500R Exam Answers Phil Dybvig October 14, 2015 By nature of the exam, almost none of the answers are unique. In a few places, I give examples of alternative correct answers. Bubbles, Doubling Strategies,
More informationPatrick M. Avitabile Managing Director Citibank, N.A. 111 Wall Street New York, New York 10005
SECURITIES LENDING AND INVESTOR PROTECTION CONCERNS: CASH COLLATERAL REINVESTMENT; BORROWER DEFAULT; LENDING AGENT COMPENSATION AND FEE SPLITS; AND PROXY VOTING Patrick M. Avitabile Managing Director Citibank,
More informationInternational Accounting Standard 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
EC staff consolidated version as of 18 February 2011 FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY International Accounting Standard 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement Objective 1 The objective of this
More informationIntroduction to Options. Derivatives
Introduction to Options Econ 422: Investment, Capital & Finance University of Washington Summer 2010 August 18, 2010 Derivatives A derivative is a security whose payoff or value depends on (is derived
More informationNet revenue 785 25 1,721 05 5,038 54 3,340 65 Tax payable (235 58) (516 32) (1,511 56) (1,002 20)
Answers Fundamentals Level Skills Module, Paper F9 Financial Management December 2013 Answers 1 (a) Calculating the net present value of the investment project using a nominal terms approach requires the
More informationHow To Account In Indian Accounting Standards
Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement Contents Paragraphs Objective 1 Scope 2 7 Definitions 8 9 Embedded derivatives 10 13 Recognition and derecognition
More informationInternational Financial Reporting Standard 7. Financial Instruments: Disclosures
International Financial Reporting Standard 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD AUGUST 2005 International Financial Reporting Standard 7 Financial Instruments:
More informationBest Practices for Credit Risk Management. Rules Notice Guidance Notice Dealer Member Rules
Rules Notice Guidance Notice Dealer Member Rules Please distribute internally to: Credit Institutional Internal Audit Legal and Compliance Operations Regulatory Accounting Retail Senior Management Trading
More informationThe Repo Market. Outline Repurchase Agreements (Repos) The Repo Market Uses of Repos in Practice
The Repo Market Outline and Readings Outline Repurchase Agreements (Repos) The Repo Market Uses of Repos in Practice Buzzwords Repo, Reverse repo, Repo rates, Collateral, Margin, Haircut, Matched book,
More informationConceptual Framework: What Does the Financial System Do? 1. Financial contracting: Get funds from savers to investors
Conceptual Framework: What Does the Financial System Do? 1. Financial contracting: Get funds from savers to investors Transactions costs Contracting costs (from asymmetric information) Adverse Selection
More informationFinancial Engineering g and Actuarial Science In the Life Insurance Industry
Financial Engineering g and Actuarial Science In the Life Insurance Industry Presentation at USC October 31, 2013 Frank Zhang, CFA, FRM, FSA, MSCF, PRM Vice President, Risk Management Pacific Life Insurance
More informationIASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April 2011. Top down approaches to discount rates
IASB/FASB Meeting Week beginning 11 April 2011 IASB Agenda reference 5A FASB Agenda Staff Paper reference 63A Contacts Matthias Zeitler mzeitler@iasb.org +44 (0)20 7246 6453 Shayne Kuhaneck skuhaneck@fasb.org
More informationAsymmetry and the Cost of Capital
Asymmetry and the Cost of Capital Javier García Sánchez, IAE Business School Lorenzo Preve, IAE Business School Virginia Sarria Allende, IAE Business School Abstract The expected cost of capital is a crucial
More informationBlack-Scholes-Merton approach merits and shortcomings
Black-Scholes-Merton approach merits and shortcomings Emilia Matei 1005056 EC372 Term Paper. Topic 3 1. Introduction The Black-Scholes and Merton method of modelling derivatives prices was first introduced
More informationAn index of credit default swaps referencing 20 bonds collateralized by subprime mortgages.
ABX Asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) Asset-backed security (ABS) Assets under management (AUM) Call (put) option Capital-to-risk-weighted assets ratio Carry trade Cash securitization CAT (catastrophe)
More informationLOS 56.a: Explain steps in the bond valuation process.
The following is a review of the Analysis of Fixed Income Investments principles designed to address the learning outcome statements set forth by CFA Institute. This topic is also covered in: Introduction
More informationFixed Income Arbitrage
Risk & Return Fixed Income Arbitrage: Nickels in Front of a Steamroller by Jefferson Duarte Francis A. Longstaff Fan Yu Fixed Income Arbitrage Broad set of market-neutral strategies intended to exploit
More informationTwo-State Options. John Norstad. j-norstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org. January 12, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011.
Two-State Options John Norstad j-norstad@northwestern.edu http://www.norstad.org January 12, 1999 Updated: November 3, 2011 Abstract How options are priced when the underlying asset has only two possible
More informationFINANCIAL ECONOMICS OPTION PRICING
OPTION PRICING Options are contingency contracts that specify payoffs if stock prices reach specified levels. A call option is the right to buy a stock at a specified price, X, called the strike price.
More informationCITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013
CITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 DATED AS OF MAY 15, 2013 Table of Contents Qualitative Disclosures Basis of Preparation and Review... 3 Risk
More informationCollateral Fundamentals
COLLATERAL INITIATIVES COORDINATION FORUM Collateral Fundamentals A Dictionary Definition of Collateral: Something pledged as security for repayment of a loan, to be forfeited in the event of a default
More informationRISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECURITY FUTURES CONTRACTS
RISK DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR SECURITY FUTURES CONTRACTS This disclosure statement discusses the characteristics and risks of standardized security futures contracts traded on regulated U.S. exchanges.
More information8. Eurodollars: Parallel Settlement
8. Eurodollars: Parallel Settlement Eurodollars are dollar balances held by banks or bank branches outside the country, which banks hold no reserves at the Fed and consequently have no direct access to
More informationAttachment A to Rules Notice 14-0066
INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA MARGIN REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN CASH AND SECURITY BORROWING AND LENDING ARRANGEMENTS - AMENDMENTS TO SCHEDULES 1, 7 AND 7A OF DEALER MEMBER FORM 1
More informationIntroduction to Futures Contracts
Introduction to Futures Contracts September 2010 PREPARED BY Eric Przybylinski Research Analyst Gregory J. Leonberger, FSA Director of Research Abstract Futures contracts are widely utilized throughout
More informationW H I T E P A P E R : C O L L A T E R A L O P T I M I S A T I O N I N A C E N T R A L L Y C L E A R E D W O R L D
4 S I G H T F I N A N C I A L S O F T W A R E W H I T E P A P E R : C O L L A T E R A L O P T I M I S A T I O N I N A C E N T R A L L Y C L E A R E D W O R L D 1 Introduction Collateral management has
More informationMargin requirements for certain cash and security borrowing and lending arrangements - Amendments to Schedules 1, 7 and 7A of Dealer Member Form 1
Rules Notice Request for Comments Dealer Member Rules Please distribute internally to: Credit Institutional Internal Audit Legal and Compliance Operations Regulatory Accounting Senior Management Trading
More informationAn Alternative Way to Diversify an Income Strategy
Senior Secured Loans An Alternative Way to Diversify an Income Strategy Alternative Thinking Series There is no shortage of uncertainty and risk facing today s investor. From high unemployment and depressed
More informationTD Mutual Funds Fund Profiles
TD Mutual Funds Fund Profiles Fixed Income Funds TD Ultra Short Term Bond Fund TD Short Term Bond Fund TD Mortgage Fund TD Canadian Bond Fund TD Income Advantage Portfolio July 21, 2010 TD Canadian Core
More informationSingle Stock Futures
Single Stock Futures Single Stock Futures (or Individual Equity Futures) are exchange traded derivative instruments offering investors amplified exposure to price movements in a wide array of listed shares.
More informationChapter 16: Financial Risk Management
Chapter 16: Financial Risk Management Introduction Overview of Financial Risk Management in Treasury Interest Rate Risk Foreign Exchange (FX) Risk Commodity Price Risk Managing Financial Risk The Benefits
More informationComplex Products. Non-Complex Products. General risks of trading
We offer a wide range of investments, each with their own risks and rewards. The following information provides you with a general description of the nature and risks of the investments that you can trade
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Application of own credit risk adjustments to derivatives
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Application of own credit risk adjustments to derivatives Issued for comment by 17 February 2012 December 2011 This publication is available
More informationA closer look Fair value measurement of financial instruments under IFRS 13
igaap: Beyond the detail A closer look Fair value measurement of financial instruments under IFRS 13 Introduction This publication considers both practical and technical aspects of applying IFRS 13 Fair
More informationINTRODUCTION TO OPTIONS MARKETS QUESTIONS
INTRODUCTION TO OPTIONS MARKETS QUESTIONS 1. What is the difference between a put option and a call option? 2. What is the difference between an American option and a European option? 3. Why does an option
More informationRisk Management at a Leading Canadian Bank An Actuarial Science Graduate's View
at a Leading Canadian Bank An Actuarial Science Graduate's View Yu Zhou Quantitative Analytics, Group Risk Management TD Bank Financial Group at a Leading Canadian Bank: An Actuarial Science Graduate s
More informationTPPE17 Corporate Finance 1(5) SOLUTIONS RE-EXAMS 2014 II + III
TPPE17 Corporate Finance 1(5) SOLUTIONS RE-EXAMS 2014 II III Instructions 1. Only one problem should be treated on each sheet of paper and only one side of the sheet should be used. 2. The solutions folder
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently asked questions on the Basel III leverage ratio framework April 2016 (update of FAQs published in July 2015) This publication is available on the BIS website
More informationSession IX: Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo. Module: Economics of Financial Markets. MSc. Financial Economics
Session IX: Stock Options: Properties, Mechanics and Valuation Lecturer: Dr. Jose Olmo Module: Economics of Financial Markets MSc. Financial Economics Department of Economics, City University, London Stock
More informationFutures Price d,f $ 0.65 = (1.05) (1.04)
24 e. Currency Futures In a currency futures contract, you enter into a contract to buy a foreign currency at a price fixed today. To see how spot and futures currency prices are related, note that holding
More informationNew York University Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences. Syllabus
New York University Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Syllabus Mathematical Finance Seminar Course: A Practical Approach to Risk Assessment of Mortgage-Backed Securities September 8, 2010 December
More informationLearning Curve Forward Rate Agreements Anuk Teasdale
Learning Curve Forward Rate Agreements Anuk Teasdale YieldCurve.com 2004 Page 1 In this article we review the forward rate agreement. Money market derivatives are priced on the basis of the forward rate,
More informationThe Search for Yield Continues: A Re-introduction to Bank Loans
INSIGHTS The Search for Yield Continues: A Re-introduction to Bank Loans 203.621.1700 2013, Rocaton Investment Advisors, LLC Executive Summary With the Federal Reserve pledging to stick to its zero interest-rate
More informationBond Options, Caps and the Black Model
Bond Options, Caps and the Black Model Black formula Recall the Black formula for pricing options on futures: C(F, K, σ, r, T, r) = Fe rt N(d 1 ) Ke rt N(d 2 ) where d 1 = 1 [ σ ln( F T K ) + 1 ] 2 σ2
More informationClaiming a Fails Charge for a Settlement Fail in U.S. Treasury Securities
Claiming a Fails Charge for a Settlement Fail in U.S. Treasury Securities January 5, 2009 During the past several months, transactions in U.S. Treasury securities have exhibited widespread and chronic
More informationTHE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015 Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction... 2 Part 2 Capital Adequacy... 4 Part 3 MCR... 7 Part 4 PCR... 10 Part 5 - Internal Model... 23 Part 6 Valuation... 34
More informationStatic Pool Analysis: Evaluation of Loan Data and Projections of Performance March 2006
Static Pool Analysis: Evaluation of Loan Data and Projections of Performance March 2006 Introduction This whitepaper provides examiners with a discussion on measuring and predicting the effect of vehicle
More informationNote 8: Derivative Instruments
Note 8: Derivative Instruments Derivative instruments are financial contracts that derive their value from underlying changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates or other financial or commodity prices
More informationAccounting for securitizations treated as a financing (on-balance sheet) verses securitizations treated as a sale (off-balance sheet)
Accounting for securitizations treated as a financing (on-balance sheet) verses securitizations treated as a sale (off-balance sheet) The hypothetical example below is provided for informational purposes
More informationHow To Become A Life Insurance Agent
Traditional, investment, and risk management actuaries in the life insurance industry Presentation at California Actuarial Student Conference University of California, Santa Barbara April 4, 2015 Frank
More informationHigh Yield Bonds A Primer
High Yield Bonds A Primer With our extensive history in the Canadian credit market dating back to the Income Trust period, our portfolio managers believe that there is considerable merit in including select
More informationThe new ACI Diploma. Unit 2 Fixed Income & Money Markets. Effective October 2014
The new ACI Diploma Unit 2 Fixed Income & Money Markets Effective October 2014 8 Rue du Mail, 75002 Paris - France T: +33 1 42975115 - F: +33 1 42975116 - www.aciforex.org The new ACI Diploma Objective
More informationFinancial derivatives in Risk Management
Financial derivatives in Risk Management A practical introduction for the MSc class of the UvA Business School 1 Contents Risk categories related to financial derivatives Market risk Overview Risk Management
More informationSecuritized-Product Investment: Risk Management Perspectives *
- March 2008 Paper Series of Risk Management in Financial Institutions Securitized-Product Investment: Risk Management Perspectives * Financial Systems and Bank Examination Department Bank of Japan Please
More informationETF Total Cost Analysis in Action
Morningstar ETF Research ETF Total Cost Analysis in Action Authors: Paul Justice, CFA, Director of ETF Research, North America Michael Rawson, CFA, ETF Analyst 2 ETF Total Cost Analysis in Action Exchange
More informationFinancial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement
STATUTORY BOARD FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD SB-FRS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement This version of the Statutory Board Financial Reporting Standard does not include amendments that
More informationHow Bankers Think. Build a sound financial base to support your company for future growth
How Bankers Think Build a sound financial base to support your company for future growth Presented by: Lisa Chapman Business Planning, Social Media Marketing & SEO 615-477-8412 Questions to Consider First
More informationProf Kevin Davis Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies. Managing Liquidity Risks. Session 5.1. Training Program ~ 8 12 December 2008 SHANGHAI, CHINA
Enhancing Risk Management and Governance in the Region s Banking System to Implement Basel II and to Meet Contemporary Risks and Challenges Arising from the Global Banking System Training Program ~ 8 12
More informationHIGH YIELD FINANCING Middle Market. ELA 45th Annual Convention Palm Desert, CA October 22 24, 2006
HIGH YIELD FINANCING Middle Market ELA 45th Annual Convention Palm Desert, CA October 22 24, 2006 Värde Partners, Inc. Founded in 1993 $2.5 billion assets under management Minneapolis and London offices
More informationOption Valuation. Chapter 21
Option Valuation Chapter 21 Intrinsic and Time Value intrinsic value of in-the-money options = the payoff that could be obtained from the immediate exercise of the option for a call option: stock price
More informationGN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance
GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance Classification Recommended Practice MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS (PCS) AND THAT
More informationSchonbucher Chapter 9: Firm Value and Share Priced-Based Models Updated 07-30-2007
Schonbucher Chapter 9: Firm alue and Share Priced-Based Models Updated 07-30-2007 (References sited are listed in the book s bibliography, except Miller 1988) For Intensity and spread-based models of default
More informationHow To Invest In Stocks And Bonds
Review for Exam 1 Instructions: Please read carefully The exam will have 21 multiple choice questions and 5 work problems. Questions in the multiple choice section will be either concept or calculation
More informationInterest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book: Macro Hedging
Interest Rate Risk Management for the Banking Book: Macro Hedging Giuseppe Loforese Head of ALM - Intesa Sanpaolo Chair of ALM Hedge Accounting WG EBF Co-Chairman IRRBB WG - EBF AGENDA IRRBB: Macro Hedging
More information