SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
|
|
- Neal Scott
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 1 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds Note: all names have been changed. Ted Simons and Phillip Haas, Plaintiffs Mary Hinds, Defendant v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case Number: Complaint Filed: [redacted] [redacted] DEFENDANT S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR AN ORDER COMPELLING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF ATTORNEY Proof of Service filed concurrently herewith; [Proposed] Order lodged herewith. Hearing Date Hearing Time Hearing Department :0 a.m. 0 Discovery Cut-Off Date: Motion Cut-Off Date: Trial Date: None Set None Set None Set 1 TO THE COURT, PLAINTIFFS TED SIMONS AND PHILLIP HAAS, AND HER COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on, 00 at :0 a.m., in Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court, Santa Monica Courthouse, located at [redacted], Defendant Mary Hinds (hereinafter 1
2 HINDS ), will, and hereby does, move the court for an for an order compelling Plaintiffs Ted Simons (hereinafter SIMONS ) and Phillip Haas (hereinafter HAAS, and collectively with SIMONS, PLAINTIFFS ) to answer the following interrogatories: Form Interrogatories to Ted Simons, Set One (hereinafter the SIMONS FORM ROGGS ) consisting of interrogatories and set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto; Special Interrogatories to Ted Simons, Set One (hereinafter the SIMONS SPECIAL ROGGS ) consisting of interrogatories and set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto; Form Interrogatories to Phillip Haas, Set One (hereinafter the HAAS FORM ROGGS ) consisting of interrogatories and set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Special Interrogatories to Jamie William, Set One (hereinafter the HAAS SPECIAL ROGGS ) consisting of interrogatories and set forth in Exhibit D attached hereto, all of which were lawfully served on PLAINTIFFS on December, 00, and imposing a $1,0 monetary sanction against PLAINTIFFS for their misuse of the discovery process, which sum is the reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by HINDS for bringing this motion. The proof of service for the SIMONS FORM ROGGS and the SIMONS SPECIAL ROGGS is set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto, and the proof of service for the HAAS FORM ROGGS and the HAAS SPECIAL ROGGS is set forth in Exhibit F attached hereto. Hereinafter, these four said sets of interrogatories are collectively referred to as the INTERROGATORIES. Unlabeled section numbers herein refer to the Code of Civil Procedure. The Motion is made on the following grounds: (a) HINDS propounded the INTERROGATORIES and other discovery on PLAINTIFFS for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence, or to
3 lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, that is relevant to HINDS S defense against this action. (b) HINDS has complied with the Grabbag Rule of set forth in (a) with the other discovery (consisting of production demands on SIMONS and production demands on HAAS) HINDS has served a total of items on each Plaintiff ( form interrogatories + special interrogatories + production demands = ). (c) PLAINTIFFS failed to respond to the INTERROGATORIES or the other discovery, failed to request additional time to respond; failed to make any effort to meet and confer either themselves or through counsel, and failed to move for a protective order. (d) Although not required by law, after the days for PLAINTIFFS to respond had lapsed, as a courtesy to them, on January 1, 00, HINDS S counsel served a meet and confer letter (hereinafter the M/ C LETTER ), but PLAINTIFFS failed to respond thereto either themselves or through counsel. The M/C LETTER is set forth in Exhibit G attached hereto. (e) By failing to respond, PLAINTIFFS have forced HINDS to bring this motion. This comprises an abuse of discovery by PLAINTIFFS for which a monetary sanction is warranted under CCP 00.0(c). This Motion is made pursuant to 00.0(b) and is based upon this Notice of Motion and Motion, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the accompanying Declaration of Attorney [redacted] (hereinafter the ATTORNEY DECLARATION ), the INTERROGATORIES (Exhibits A, B, C and D), the proofs of service thereof (Exhibits E and F), the M/C LETTER (Exhibit G), the [Proposed] Order lodged herewith, the entire file in this matter, and any other and further oral and/or
4 documentary evidence that this court may chose to consider at the time of the hearing on this Motion. Respectfully Submitted, Date: Law Office of [redacted] Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds
5 1 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.... The INTERROGATORIES Were Lawfully Propounded.... PLAINTIFFS have Failed to Serve a Timely Response to the INTERROGATORIES.... PLAINTIFFS have Waived Their Rights to Object or to Seek a Protective Order.... The Court Has Authority Grant the Motion and Compel PLAINTIFFS to Respond to the INTERROGATORIES.... If the Motion is Granted, the Court Must Order PLAINTIFFS to Pay HINDS Her Expenses and Attorney Fees Incurred in Making the Motion, Even If PLAINTIFFS Serve Responses.... Conclusion
6 1 1 Cases Table of Authorities Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants Cal.App.th 0... Code of Civil Procedure Rules California Rules of Court rule.0... Treatises California Practice Guide Civil Procedure before Trial (00) The Rutter Group :
7 Memorandum of Points and Authorities Definitions set forth in the foregoing Notice of Motion and Motion are incorporated herein. Unlabeled section numbers herein refer to the Code of Civil Procedure. 1. Introduction This action by PLAINTIFFS is utterly without merit. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, It is the fourth action PLAINTIFFS have taken against HINDS on the same subject matter they have lost three times and have now come back a fourth time with the very same meritless allegations. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, PLAINTIFFS first attempt was an administrative action they filed with Los Angeles Housing Department (hereinafter LAHD ), case number [redacted]. They lost. LAHD determined that HINDS had lawfully evicted them. Exhibit H attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of an , sent internally within LAHD, indicating that the said case was closed in favor of HINDS. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, PLAINTIFFS second attempt was another administrative action they filed with LAHD, case number [redacted]. They lost again. LAHD again determined that HINDS had lawfully evicted them. Exhibit I attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of an , sent internally within LAHD, indicating that the said case was closed in favor of HINDS. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, PLAINTIFFS third attempt was a lawsuit filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, case number [redacted]. They lost yet again. The court dismissed the action. Exhibit J attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of the minute order issued on April, 00 granting HINDS s motion to quash service of the summons and dismiss the action. Exhibit K attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of the minute order issued on May, 00 denying PLAINTIFFS motion for reconsideration thereof.
8 Becoming increasingly vexatious, the PLAINTIFFS then filed this meritless action based on the very same set of facts. HINDS is entitled to due process, which includes the right to propound discovery, including the INTERROGATORIES, to obtain evidence from PLAINTIFFS in her defense. However, as supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION 1 and, when served with the INTERROGATORIES and other discovery by HINDS, HAAS failed to respond after actually receiving it, and SIMONS refused to receive it, much less respond (the discovery sent via Certified Mail to SIMONS was returned unclaimed by the Postal Service). Nor did they respond to the M/C LETTER. This conduct is totally unbecoming of any serious plaintiff particularly in what is now their fourth round of attack on HINDS and it proves that the PLAINTIFFS know very well their case has no merit. By now it is transparent that the PLAINTIFFS sole purpose is harassment, including forcing HINDS to bring this motion to compel, thereby incurring attorney fees. And, while they have not succeeded in obtaining any relief from HINDS, they have indeed succeeded at harassing her. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, the PLAINTIFFS vexatious course of conduct has caused substantial emotional distress to HINDS, and quite reasonably so. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, the INTERROGATORIES are targeted to obtain admissible evidence, and/or to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, that is relevant to HINDS S defense against this action.. The INTERROGATORIES Were Lawfully Propounded. After being served with process, a defendant in a civil action may propound discovery at any time without leave of court see as to interrogatories. In a limited civil action, discovery must comply with the Grabbag Rule of set forth in (a), which caps the total number of interrogatories, plus production demands, plus requests for admissions, at items per answering party. As supported by Exhibits A through D and ATTORNEY DECLARATION, SIMONS and HAAS were each served
9 with form interrogatories, special interrogatories, production demands, and no requests for admissions totaling items for SIMONS and items for HAAS.. PLAINTIFFS have Failed to Serve a Timely Response to the INTERROGATORIES. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, the INTERROGATORIES were served on PLAINTIFFS by mail on December, 00. The time for PLAINTIFFS to respond was therefore within days 0 days, plus days due to the mailing within California. Within 0 days after service of interrogatories, the party to whom the interrogatories are propounded shall serve the original of the response to them on the propounding party 00.0(a). In case of service by mail,... any... duty to... make any response within any period... after the service of the document, which time period... is prescribed by statute..., shall be extended five calendar days, upon service by mail,... 1(a). Section 1 applies to any method of discovery The th day after December, 00 was January 1, 00 which was the last day for PLAINTIFFS to timely respond. As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION 1, the M/C LETTER was served on PLAINTIFFS by mail on January 1, 00. This was done as a courtesy to them no meet and confer letter is required for a motion to compel responses to interrogatories when there has been no response. [M]eet-and-confer requirement of former Cal. Rules of Court, rule.1 (now embodied in 00.00, subd. (b)) did not apply when propounding party sought order compelling responses to interrogatories and sanctions for responding party's failure to respond within the statutorily permitted time Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants Cal.App.th As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, PLAINTIFFS have neither served any response to the INTERROGATORIES, nor contacted HINDS to meet and
10 confer, nor had any counsel representing them contact HINDS, nor filed any motion for a protective order. Therefore, PLAINTIFFS have failed to timely respond to the INTERROGATORIES.. PLAINTIFFS have Waived Their Rights to Object or to Seek a Protective Order. If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response, the following rules apply: (a) The party to whom the interrogatories are directed waives... any objection to the interrogatories, , emphasis added. The party also waives the right to seek a protective order. When interrogatories have been propounded, the responding party... may promptly move for a protective order (a), emphasis added. If a protective order is to be obtained, relief must be sought: [ ] Promptly...; and [ ] Before expiration of the 0 day period within which to respond to the interrogatories... California Practice Guide Civil Procedure before Trial (00) The Rutter Group :1, italics in original. Thus, by failing to serve a timely response, PLAINTIFFS have waived their rights to object or to seek a protective order.. The Court Has Authority Grant the Motion and Compel PLAINTIFFS to Respond to the INTERROGATORIES provides, If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response... (b) The party propounding the interrogatories may move for an order compelling response to the interrogatories. Since the INTERROGATORIES have been lawfully propounded and PLAINTIFFS have not responded, the Court has the authority to grant the Motion and compel them to respond. / / / / / / / / / / / /
11 If the Motion is Granted, the Court Must Order PLAINTIFFS to Pay HINDS Her Expenses and Attorney Fees Incurred in Making the Motion, Even If PLAINTIFFS Serve Responses. 00.0(c) provides, The court shall impose a monetary sanction... against any party,... who unsuccessfully... opposes a motion to compel a response to interrogatories... (Emphasis added.) 0.0 provides, Misuses of the discovery process include... (d) Failing to respond... to an authorized method of discovery. 0.00(a) provides for a monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process... pay the reasonable expenses... incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct. (Emphasis added.) The court may award sanctions... even though no opposition to the motion was filed,... or the requested discovery was provided... after the motion was filed. California Rules of Court rule.0(a). As supported by ATTORNEY DECLARATION, HINDS S reasonable costs in making the motion are $0, and her reasonable attorney fees for counsel to represent him at the hearing hereon are $1,0. Therefore, if the motion is granted, the Court must order PLAINTIFFS to pay HINDS her costs of $0 and attorney fees of $1,0 incurred in making the motion, even if they serve responses.. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court should GRANT the motion. Respectfully submitted, 1 Dated: Law Office of [redacted] Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds
12 I, [redacted], declare: Declaration by Attorney [redacted] The following is based on my own personal knowledge and if called to testify, I could, and would, testify competently thereto..i am incorporating herein the definitions set forth in the foregoing Notice of Motion and Motion..I am the attorney of record for Defendant Mary Hinds (HINDS) in the above entitled action..this action comprises the PLAINTIFFS fourth attempt to recover from HINDS based on her lawfully evicting them..the PLAINTIFFS first attempt was an administrative action they filed with LAHD, case number [redacted]. LAHD determined that HINDS had lawfully evicted them. Exhibit H attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of an , sent internally within LAHD, indicating that the said case was closed in favor of HINDS..The PLAINTIFFS second attempt was another administrative action they filed with LAHD, case number [redacted]. LAHD again determined that HINDS had lawfully evicted them. Exhibit I attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of an , sent internally within LAHD, indicating that the said case was closed in favor of HINDS..The PLAINTIFFS third attempt was a lawsuit filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, case number [redacted]. The court dismissed the action. Exhibit J attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of the minute order issued on April, 00 granting HINDS s motion to quash service of the summons and dismiss the action. Exhibit K attached hereto sets forth a true and correct copy of the minute order issued on May, 00 denying PLAINTIFFS motion for reconsideration thereof. 1
13 The PLAINTIFFS vexatious course of conduct has caused substantial emotional distress to HINDS..The INTERROGATORIES are targeted to obtain admissible evidence, and/or to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, that is relevant to HINDS S defense against this action..in addition to the INTERROGATORIES, I also served production demands on SIMONS and production demands on HAAS. No requests for admissions were served..on December, 00, I separately served the INTERROGATORIES on SIMONS and on HAAS via certified mail. True and correct copies of the INTERROGATORIES as served are set forth in Exhibits A, B, C and D attached hereto. The production demands were enclosed in the same envelope. True and correct copies of the proofs of service thereof are attached hereto as Exhibits E and F. 1.I received a delivery receipt signature card back from the Postal Service that was signed by HAAS on December, 00, a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit L, indicating receipt of the discovery. SIMONS either refused the envelope mailed to her or failed to claim it from the Postal Service, and it was returned to me a true and correct copy of the still-sealed envelope is attached hereto as Exhibit M. 1.On January 1, 00, I separately served the M/C LETTER on SIMONS and on HAAS. A true and correct copy of the M/C LETTER as served is set forth in Exhibit G attached hereto..as of the date of signing hereof, I have received no response to either the INTERROGATORIES or to the M/C LETTER or to any of the other discovery. Nor have I received any notice of motion for a protective order. On March, 00, my office checked the Case Summary page on the Court web site ( for case number [redacted], and, under 1
14 1 1 Documents Filed there was no motion for a protective order. Nor have I received any other communication from PLAINTIFFS or from any counsel representing PLAINTIFFS..As a result of PLAINTIFFS S failure to respond to the INTERROGATORIES and other discovery, HINDS has necessarily incurred the following reasonable costs. This Motion is one of two concurrently filed discovery motions. The accounting below is shared among both discovery motions, and is identically stated in my declaration accompanying the other motion. My regular rate is $ per hour. Motion filing fees ( motions) $0 Attorney fees for motion preparation and appearance ( hours) $1,0 Total costs and attorney fees $1,0 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 0 1 Dated: [redacted]
15 Exhibit A SIMONS FORM ROGGS
16 Exhibit B SIMONS SPECIAL ROGGS
17 Exhibit C HAAS FORM ROGGS
18 Exhibit D HAAS SPECIAL ROGGS
19 Exhibit E Proof of service of the Discovery on SIMONS
20 Exhibit F Proof of service of the Discovery on HAAS 0
21 Exhibit G Meet and Confer Letter 1
22 Exhibit H Indicating Closure of LAHD Case Number [redacted]
23 Exhibit I Indicating Closure of LAHD Case Number [redacted]
24 Exhibit J Minute Order Issued on April, 00
25 Exhibit K Minute Order Issued on May, 00
26 Exhibit L Delivery Receipt Signature Card Back from the Postal Service
27 Exhibit M Copy of the Still-Sealed Envelope Mailed to SIMONS
28
29 [attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendant Mary Hinds 1 1 Ted Simons and Phillip Haas, Plaintiffs Mary Hinds, Defendant v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case Number: Complaint Filed: [redacted] [redacted] [PROPOSED] ORDER COMPELLING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS Hearing Date Hearing Time Hearing Department 0 1 The motion by Defendant Mary Hinds (hereinafter HINDS ), for an order compelling Plaintiffs Ted Simons (hereinafter SIMONS ) and Phillip Haas (hereinafter HAAS, and collectively with SIMONS, PLAINTIFFS ) to answer the following interrogatories: Form Interrogatories to Ted Simons, Set One (hereinafter the SIMONS FORM ROGGS ); Special Interrogatories to Ted Simons, Set One (hereinafter the SIMONS SPECIAL ROGGS ); Form Interrogatories to Phillip Haas, Set One (hereinafter the HAAS FORM ROGGS ); and 1 ORDER COMPELLING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS
30 Special Interrogatories to Jamie William, Set One (hereinafter the HAAS SPECIAL ROGGS ), came on regularly for noticed hearing on in Department of this Court. HINDS appeared by counsel [redacted]. SIMONS appeared in pro per appeared by counsel did not appear. HAAS appeared in pro per appeared by counsel did not appear. On proof made to the satisfaction of the Court that the motion ought to be granted, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. SIMONS is ordered to prepare and serve on HINDS on or before complete, verified answers without objections to the SIMONS FORM ROGGS and the SIMONS SPECIAL ROGGS. HAAS is ordered to prepare and serve on HINDS on or before complete, verified answers without objections to the HAAS FORM ROGGS and the HAAS SPECIAL ROGGS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PLAINTIFFS shall pay monetary sanctions to HINDS in the amount of $ on or before. SIMONS and HAAS are each ordered to pay half of that amount. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Judge of the Superior Court ORDER COMPELLING ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
[attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendants the DIXON FURNITURE, INC, NANCY DIXON, and MATT DIXON
More informationEntering Default against Defendants
Revised: August Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Entering Default against Defendants When a properly served defendant fails to appear in a lawsuit on time, the plaintiff may request
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 44A Article 3 1
Article 3. Model Payment and Performance Bond. 44A-25. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires in this Article: (1) "Claimant" includes any individual, firm, partnership, association or corporation
More informationHow To Answer A Complaint In A Civil Case
Revised: April 1 Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: WESTERN DIVISION How to Answer the Complaint What is an Answer? An answer is your written response to the allegations made in the
More informationFamily Law Discovery Issues
Research Guide Last Updated: January 2013 Table of Contents How to Prepare and Serve Form Interrogatories on the Other Party (JC Form #FL-145)... 2 How to Respond to Family Law Form Interrogatories (not
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
[attorney name redacted], Esq. (CSBN ///////////) ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// ////////////// Attorneys for Defendants the DIXON FURNITURE, INC, NANCY DIXON, and MATT DIXON
More informationCompulsory Arbitration
Local Rule 1301 Scope. Compulsory Arbitration Local Rule 1301 Scope. (1) The following civil actions shall first be submitted to and heard by a Board of Arbitrators: (a) (b) (c) (d) Civil actions, proceedings
More informationHow To File A Family Law Case In California
DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2011 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of
More informationRULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
More informationBy MARY WECHTER, Deputy Clerk. and the following proceedings were had: notice given per section CCP 664.5:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WEST DISTRICT, SANTA MONICA COURTHOUSE (19484 1725 MAIN STREET, SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 TELEPHONE: (310 260-1887 PNMAC MORTAGE vs. STANKO, KAMIE Case
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Attorney for Defendants John Smith, and Stan Moon SUE KIM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL DISTRICT, MOSK COURTHOUSE UNLIMITED Plaintiff vs. JOHN SMITH, an
More information(2) For production of public records or hospital medical records. Where the subpoena commands any custodian of public records or any custodian of hosp
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
More informationCase4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
More informationCase 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:08-cv-00507-RP-CFB Document 245 Filed 09/02/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION,etal., Plaintiffs, v. WELLSFARGO&CO.,and WELLSFARGOBANK,N.A.,
More informationCivil Suits: The Process
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
More informationHEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES
City of Seattle OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER HEARING EXAMINER RULES FOR WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION CASES Adopted May 8, 2014 Office of Hearing Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4000 Mailing: PO Box 94729 Seattle,
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO STACY MCDOWELL, et al., : Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064 vs. : Judge McBride PATRICK SHELDON : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Schwartz Manes Ruby & Slovin,
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationCase3:12-cv-05980-CRB Document265 Filed07/20/15 Page2 of 12
Case:-cv-00-CRB Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 0 IN RE HP SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: All Actions MASTER
More informationINFORMATION FOR FILING AND DEFENDING A CIVIL CASE IN JUSTICE COURT
PINAL COUNTY Apache Junction Justice Court Eloy Justice Court Superior/Kearny Justice Court Maricopa/Stanfield Justice Court JUSTICE COURTS Casa Grande Justice Court Florence/Coolidge Justice Court Mammoth/San
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationJUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant )
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant ) I,, being before the Court this day and with my counsel, Attorney, represent
More informationE-FILED. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Peter MacKinnon, Jr. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CASE NO. 111 CV 193767
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. ) adam@gutridesafier.com SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. ) seth@gutridesafier.com TODD KENNEDY (State Bar No. 0) todd@gutridesafier.com GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP Douglass Street San
More informationNACTT ACADEMY TOOLBOX. A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE to Selling Property While in Chapter 13 *
I. SUMMARY: NACTT ACADEMY TOOLBOX A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE to Selling Property While in Chapter 13 * Beverly M. Burden, Chapter 13 Trustee, Lexington, KY Before a consumer debtor in chapter 13 may sell
More informationShort Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice
Short Form Order NEW YORK SUPREME COURT - QUEENS COUNTY PRESENT: HON. ORIN R. KITZES PART 17 Justice -----------------------------------------------------------------X NC TWO, L.P., as successor in interest
More informationDefendant s Interrogatories Addressed To Plaintiff Premises Liability Cases
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PLAINTIFF S NAME : Civil Trial Division : : Compulsory Arbitration Program : vs. : : Term, 20 : DEFENDANT S NAME
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING This Notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit as described below. You are eligible to receive a portion
More informationEARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT
EARLY CARE & EDUCATION LAW UNIT Publication Date: November 2013 WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SMALL CLAIMS COURT In the operation of your child care business you may encounter problems which force you to
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
M.R. 3140 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS Order entered February 16, 2011. (Deleted material is struck through and new material is underscored.) Effective immediately, Supreme Court Rules
More informationMOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT. If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER
MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT If you want to file a SMALL CLAIMS ANSWER MOHAVE COUNTY JUSTICE COURT You (the defendant) have TWENTY (20) calendar days to file an answer to the small claims complaint. The
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW
DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2011 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) ) E026671 Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) Superior v. ) Court No. ) FWV-17587
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN B179806
Filed 10/19/05; pub. order 11/16/05 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN Conservatorship of the Persons of JERRY P. KAYLE et al.
More informationHOW TO FILE AN ANSWER
PRO SE OFFICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 500 PEARL STREET, ROOM 230 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 Ruby J. Krajick CLERK OF COURT HOW TO FILE AN ANSWER An answer
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A 1
Chapter 1A. Rules of Civil Procedure. 1A-1. Rules of Civil Procedure. The Rules of Civil Procedure are as follows: Article 1. Scope of Rules-One Form of Action. Rule 1. Scope of rules. These rules shall
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Case No: Defendants, Steven Lecy and the City of Minneapolis, through their
CASE 0:13-cv-00873-RHK-TNL Document 1 Filed 04/15/13 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Michael A. Ofor, Case No: Plaintiff, v. Steven Lecy, and City of Minneapolis, NOTICE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SETTLEMENT OFFICER INFORMATION: _ Telephone: 1 1 1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Case No: RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Date: Time: :0 a.m. Case Assigned
More informationSMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 500 Filed 04/30/15 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #13368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW
More informationPERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
PERSONAL INJURY COURTS (DEPTS. 91, 92, 93 AND 97) FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS TO UNDERSTAND PROCEDURES IN THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURTS, PLEASE CAREFULLY REVIEW THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT S (LASC
More informationPROSECUTING AND DEFENDING A SMALL CLAIMS CASE. Instructions Sample Forms Rules Statutes. Effective June 7, 2005
PROSECUTING AND DEFENDING A SMALL CLAIMS CASE Instructions Sample Forms Rules Statutes Effective June 7, 2005 1 SMALL CLAIMS INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS Please read carefully. Definitions follow the instructions.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 1 1 1 1 1 In the Matter of the Agreed Case: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and LYON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., doing business as U.S. BANCORP BUSINESS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM RE: ) Supreme Court Case No. PRM 06-006 ) ) QMENDING PROMULGATION ORDER ) PROMULGATION ORDER NO. YO. 06-006-02 ON THE LOCAL RULES 06-006-10 DF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM )
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE GARNISHMENT CHAPTER 77 77.01 Right to writ of garnishment.--every person or entity who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment in any court against any person
More informationCase 3:08-cv-00824-JSW Document 5 Filed 02/08/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 MARTIN D. SINGER, ESQ. (BAR NO. WILLIAM J. BRIGGS, II, ESQ. (BAR NO. EVAN N. SPIEGEL, ESQ. (BAR NO. 0 LAVELY & SINGER PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Century Park
More informationCase 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13477-FDS Document 64 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS RICHARD MEYER and KATHLEEN LEONE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly
More informationhttps://www.lexis.com/research/retrieve?_m=1158fddba473599c44d5...
Page 1 of 8 20 Cal. App. 4th 256, *; 24 Cal. Rptr. 2d 501, **; 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1169, ***; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 8641 DALIA GHANOONI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUPER SHUTTLE OF LOS ANGELES et
More informationCase 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-02847-IPJ Document 292 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED 2015 May-27 AM 10:35 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationFORM INTERROGATORIES EMPLOYMENT LAW
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SHORT
More informationPIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT 930 TACOMA AVE S, Room 239, TACOMA, 98402. Small Claims Information
930 TACOMA AVE S, Room 239, TACOMA, 98402 Small Claims Information A Small Claims case can be filed for the recovery of money only. This amount cannot exceed $5,000. LEGAL ADVICE The clerk will assist
More informationPrepared by: Hon. Duncan W. Keir, Judge U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland. and. Richard L. Wasserman, Esq.
Memorandum Summarizing Procedures With Respect To Removal Of Bankruptcy-Related State Court Actions To The United States District Court And United States Bankruptcy Court In Maryland Prepared by: Hon.
More informationTO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS
TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS This Notice Is Given To Inform You Of The Proposed Settlement Of A Class Action. If The Settlement Is Approved By The Court, Certain Benefits
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PLAINTIFF, Successor-in-Interest to Plaintiff, vs. DEFENDANT, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S
More informationPART III Discovery. Overview of the Discovery Process CHAPTER 8 KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY. Information is obtainable by one or more discovery
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
More informationBERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA WORKMEN S COMPENSATION RULES OF COURT 1965 SR&O 14 / 1966 [made under section 41 of the Workmen s Compensation Act 1965 brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF
More informationSPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Special Civil A Guide to the Court page 1 Special Civil is a court of limited jurisdiction
More informationLast amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011.
Last amended by Order dated March 1, 2011; effective May 2, 2011. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FOUR PRETRIAL PROCEDURES, DEPOSITIONS AND PRODUCTION AT TRIAL Rule 4:5. Depositions Upon Oral Examination.
More informationAs a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 93-0141L APPROVAL OF LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL OF THE 241ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF SMITH COUNTY ORDERED: Pursuant to Rule 3a of the Texas Rules of Civil
More informationPart VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPENDIX C - New Jersey Tax Court Rules Part VIII RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Rule 8:1. Rule 8:2. Rule 8:3. Rule 8:4. TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope: Applicability Review Jurisdiction
More informationINDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division INFORMATION ON REPRESENTING YOURSELF (PRO SE) IN A CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION The following instructions have been compiled to
More informationPRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
More informationHOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing
00 STATE OF WYOMING 0LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Gingery A BILL for AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing for
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 10/7/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LARS ROULAND et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PACIFIC SPECIALTY
More informationCONTEMPT OF CUSTODY ORDER SELF-HELP KIT
LYCOMING COUNTY CONTEMPT OF CUSTODY ORDER SELF-HELP KIT REMEMBER The law often changes. Each case is different. This self-help kit is meant to give you general information and not to give you specific
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
Filed 4/12/16 McBane v. Wilks CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered
More informationMissouri Small Claims Court Handbook. The Missouri Bar Young Lawyers' Section
Missouri Small Claims Court Handbook The Missouri Bar Young Lawyers' Section TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT...1 Page II. THINGS TO CONSIDER BEFORE BRINGING A CLAIM...1 A. WHO
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD F. STOKES 1 THE CIRCLE, SUITE 2 JUDGE SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 Stephen P. Doughty, Esquire Lyons Doughty & Velhuis, P.C. 15 Ashley Place,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION: MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. L- IN RE: MIDDLESEX ASBESTOS LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION GENERAL ORDER I. COMPLAINTS A. All complaints must: 1. Include
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 SESSION LAW 2011-199 HOUSE BILL 380 AN ACT TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND TO MAKE CONFORMING CHANGES TO
More informationFinancial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge:
Financial Pacific Leasing, LLC v Bloch Group, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 30891(U) April 4, 2014 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 652595/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationu NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
NNED ON 1011612009 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK - NEW YORK COUNTY ndex Number : 602026/2007 SLVERMARK CORP. vs. ROSENTHAL&ROSENTHALNC SEQUENCE NUMBER : 003 SUMMARY JUDGMENT - MOTON DATE MOTON
More informationCase 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case 3:11-cv-00545-RCJ-WGC Document 96 Filed 12/18/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA HOWARD L. HOWELL, Lead Plaintiff, ELLISA PANCOE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others
More informationTAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY. Part VIII Rules Handbook RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY
TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Part VIII Rules Handbook RULES GOVERNING PRACTICE IN THE TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY Revised November 17, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule Page RULE 8:1. SCOPE: APPLICABILITY 4 RULE 8:2.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF: ) ) GENERAL ORDER No. 10-07 ORDER AUTHORIZING ) ELECTRONIC FILING ) (Supersedes General Order ) Nos. 08-02 and 08-11) ) Table
More informationILLINOIS WHISTLEBLOWER REWARD AND PROTECTION ACT
. ILLINOIS WHISTLEBLOWER REWARD AND PROTECTION ACT 175/1. Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act. 175/2. Definitions 2. Definitions. As used in this Act: (a)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.
More informationCase4:13-cv-05618-KAW Document64 Filed12/16/14 Page1 of 5
Case4:13-cv-056-KAW Document64 Filed12//14 Page1 of 5 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 1312 1 United States Attorney ALEX G. TSE (CABN 1548 2 Chief, Civil Division REBECCA A. F ALK (CSBN 6798 3 Assistant United States
More information-1- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via Del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
More informationTEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS Adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas Justice Court, Pct 1 1 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. GENERAL... 6 RULE 523. DISTRICT
More information105-374. Foreclosure of tax lien by action in nature of action to foreclose a mortgage.
105-374. Foreclosure of tax lien by action in nature of action to foreclose a mortgage. (a) General Nature of Action. The foreclosure action authorized by this section shall be instituted in the appropriate
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL Document 437 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :0-cv-0-DLR Document Filed 0// Page of 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Local Teamsters Pension and Welfare Funds, et al., v. Plaintiffs, Apollo Group Incorporated,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4234 C. RAY
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 2/19/10 Vince v. City of Orange CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationFOR USE IN THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
LITIGANTS MANUAL FOR USE IN THE MARION COUNTY SMALL CLAIMS COURTS The Indiana General Assembly created the Marion County Small Claims Courts and provided that litigants may try their cases in such courts
More informationSTEP-PARENT ADOPTIONS AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY SELF HELP CENTER STEP-PARENT ADOPTIONS AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS Material prepared and/or distributed by the Superior Court Clerk s Office IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATIONAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585
Filed 2/26/15 Vega v. Goradia CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationCase 1:11-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 : : : : :
Case 111-cv-01918-LGS Document 151 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- 6/8/15 X In re SHENGDATECH,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0083 Keith Melillo, Appellant, vs. Terry Arden
More informationAny civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
More informationCHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES
CHAPTER 7 UNIFORM COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES Section 1. Authority. These Uniform County Board of Equalization Practice and Procedure Rules are promulgated by authority of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants, Nominal Defendant.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re ORACLE CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION SCOTT OZAKI, derivatively and on behalf of ORACLE CORPORATION,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
John A. Clarke, Executive Oacer/Clerk * Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LAOSD ASBESTOS LITIGATION JCCP CASE NO. 4674 ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE
More informationRULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL
RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 19, except as provided in that rule. Witness to testify orally (2) Subject to any Act, statute
More informationJanuary 24, 2013. Via Federal Express. Los Angeles County v. Superior Court (Anderson-Barker) Supreme Court Case No. S207443
GMSR Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP Law Offices 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12'' Floor Los Angeles, California 90036 (31 O) 859-7811 Fax (31 0) 276-5261 www.gmsr.com Writer's E-Mail: tcoates@gmsr.com
More information