1 Welcome to this presentation on using RTI information to develop an IEP. It was developed by the Building RTI Capacity project team from the Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk at The University of Texas at Austin.
2 The funds the Building RTI Capacity In Texas Schools Project to develop and disseminate resources to facilitate RTI implementation. Our team partners with colleagues in our state regional education service centers and professional organizations to conduct professional development. Our primary objective is to make information about RTI implementation available to educators 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, through our project Web site.
3 To prepare for this presenta.on, you ll need to download a few items: The Collabora.ve Instruc.onal Log, the Collabora.ve Instruc.onal Log for Dean, and the Collabora.ve Instruc.onal Log for Julia. You can download copies by clicking on the hyperlinks on the slide. Collaborative Instructional Log: Dean s CIL: hbp://buildingr..utexas.org/cap/iepgoals/cil_dean.pdf Julia s CIL: hbp://buildingr..utexas.org/cap/iepgoals/cil_julia.pdf
4 In this session we will identify key IDEA concepts related to the use of RTI in identifying students with disabilities. Next we ll link these RTI concepts to IDEA requirements for developing an IEP; and then apply this information. We ll use a scenario to consider data for fictional students, and explore use of a tool designed for teacher communication and student data collection. Finally we will look at their draft IEPs developed for consideration at the Admission, Review and Dismissal, or ARD Committee meeting. We ll practice the IEP development process twice, once for a student who is close to meeting grade level expectations, and once for a student who continues to need special education to close her gaps in learning.
5 It s important to begin with a shared understanding of what Response to Intervention, or RTI, means. To many educators, RTI is an instructional framework that targets at-risk students. The National Association of State Directors of Special Education defines RTI as a framework that prevents learning difficulties by providing high quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs, and using learning rate over time and level of performance to make important educational decisions. As an instructional framework, RTI uses student assessment data to inform instruction and intervention. Screening and benchmark measures identify students with gaps in learning. These at-risk students immediately receive intervention instruction that is designed to close their gaps. Student response to the intervention is measured with frequent progress monitoring. Educators use the progress monitoring data to determine whether the intervention is working, and to make necessary adjustments to increase its effectiveness. Intervention is provided at levels or tiers of increasing intensity matched to student needs. Other terms associated with RTI include 3-Tier Model, multi-tiered intervention model, and Instructional Decision-making Model, or IDM.
6 Now that we ve discussed RTI as an instructional framework that prevents learning difficulties, let s focus on using RTI in the identification of students with specific learning disabilities, or SLDs. In IDEA 2004, RTI is used in the context of the determination of the presence of a specific learning disability. IDEA states that the group of qualified individuals and the parent must consider as part of the evaluation (1) Data that demonstrate that prior to, or as part of, the referral process, the child was provided appropriate instruction in regular education settings, delivered by qualified personnel: and (2) Data-based documentation of repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting formal assessment of student progress during instruction, which was provided to the child s parents. Does this sound familiar? Appropriate instruction documentation of repeated assessments reasonable intervals student progress: All of this data is required for eligibility determination, regardless of the model used for identifying SLD. And again, these concepts are all addressed within an RTI framework.
7 IDEA describes RTI data as including documentation of the student s participation in RTI, including the instructional strategies used and the student data collected.
8 What does student RTI data look like? Let s look at the Collaborative Instructional Log that you downloaded earlier. It is a tool designed to provide one place to document a student s progress in special education intervention instruction. There is also a version of the log for at-risk students. Both document the student s response to intervention instruction over time, and at specified intervals, including the strategies that were taught. The top row shows key student information: reading assessment baseline data, annual goals and criteria to exit intervention, specifics about the core reading instruction, and the intervention summary, including specially designed instruction and instructional settings. Note, this is NOT the same as an IEP. The next row begins the documentation of the student s response to the special education intervention. The far left cell shows the dates of a 2 or 3 week intervention period, time of day when the intervention is provided, and short-term goals.the next cell is for noting the one or two research-based strategies that will be taught during that period. Next, Teacher(s) Responsible lists who is responsible for teaching the strategy (noted by an asterisk), and those who will hold the student accountable for using the strategies Next there is a place for teachers to note what worked with the student, or modifications needed, and then finally, the data from progress monitoring at the end of the period..
9 Last year the teachers at Barbara Jordan Elementary selected the Dynamic Indicators of Early Literacy Skills, or DIBELS, as their universal screening instrument. For fourth grade, DIBELS includes a measure for Oral Reading Fluency, or ORF. This measures oral reading fluency by recording the number of words read correctly per minute (wcpm). Notice the number of words correct for the 50%ile, which is the benchmark measure that Barbara Jordan teachers use as an indicator of adequate progress. Note the increases from Beginning of Year (BOY) to Middle of Year (MOY) and End of Year (EOY). Teachers use 118 wcpm or better as the goal for all fourth graders.
10 Let s look at two students in Ms. Herman s fourth grade class, Dean and Julia. Both students are identified as having specific learning disabilities in reading, and have been receiving special education services. It s time for their annual IEP review. Ms. Herman arranges a meeting with Ms. Martinez, the special education teacher, to plan their recommendations for the students IEPs at the Admission, Review and Dismissal (ARD) Committee meetings. Both teachers work closely and collaborate to meet their students needs. The two teachers examine Dean s and Julia s beginning of the year (BOY) and middle of the year (MOY) DIBELS assessment data, along with their Collaborative Instructional Logs showing special education intervention progress. Let s start with Dean. How does Dean s middle-of-year (MOY) DIBELS score of 104 compare to the grade level benchmark for reading fluency? He has definitely made progress by averaging a little more than +1 wcpm weekly, but his score is just barely within the some risk category. Prior to the winter break, he actually met the MOY benchmark goals. The MOY data indicate that Dean still may have slight risk and can still benefit from additional fluency intervention. What would your recommendations be for Dean?.
11 Let s examine the intervention Dean received. Take a look at Dean s Collaborative Instructional Log that you downloaded previously. Ms. Herman and Ms. Martinez reviewed his Collaborative Instructional Log and discussed Dean s progress. You can see that he began the year with a Fluency score of 82, that his goal is to be reading with grade level fluency at the end of the year (118), and that he receives 30 minutes of additional small group special education intervention in the resource room 3 days a week, and received it in the regular classroom 2 days a week. Let s look at the notes about the intervention he received. For the first period, the goal was to increase his fluency rate from 82 to 87 wcpm, or by more than two words per week (highly ambitious!). The intervention strategies were to teach him the strategy of re-reading, with a focus on rate. Ms. Martinez notes indicate that she was recording Dean reading aloud weekly, and also noted that his focus on speed was causing him comprehension difficulties. The progress monitoring data at the end of the period shows he improved his rate by 1.5 wcpm, which is great In the next intervention period, the teachers focused on accuracy rather than rate, and worked with him on comprehension and vocabulary. His intervention goal of 89 wcpm indicates that his teachers continue to have high expectations for him. Read the strategies, and the teachers notes. He met his fluency goal of 89.
12 Now take a moment to study Dean s Collaborative Instructional Log. Identify ways the teachers worked together to provide systematic fluency-building instruction to improve Dean s reading fluency.
13 What did Dean s teachers discuss? His middle-of-year (MOY) DIBELS score of 104 shows that he is almost meeting grade level benchmark for reading fluency. He has definitely made progress by averaging a little more than +1 wcpm weekly, but his score puts him barely within the some risk category. Prior to the winter break, he actually met the MOY benchmark goals. The MOY data indicate that Dean still may have slight risk and can still benefit from additional fluency intervention. His Collaborative Log indicates that he has made significant progress and is highly motivated as well. What would your recommendations be for Dean?
14 Both teachers agree that Dean has been making such good progress that he no longer needs the specialized instruction that Ms. Martinez provides in special education. In fact, Dean is reading better than several of Ms. Herman s students who are not receiving special education instruction! If the ARD Committee agrees to exit him from special education, Ms. Herman will add Dean to a Tier II intervention group with fluency building as his target. In that way he will continue to receive intervention support and have his progress regularly monitored. If the ARD Committee determines that Dean continues to meet SLD eligibility, his teachers will suggest IEP goals that will continue focus on meeting grade level reading benchmarks, but exclusively in an inclusion setting. Both teachers think another IEP meeting should be held at the end of the year to determine if he needs special education.
15 You downloaded a copy of Julia s Collaborative Instructional Log earlier. Now let s look at Julia data Julia began the year At Risk, with a Fluency score of 55 wcpm, with 7 errors. Like Dean, her annual reading goal is to reach grade level reading fluency at the end of the year (118). Because of her low fluency rate, her teacher assessed her phonics skills. The Phonics Assessment score was also low, 25 correct out of 50 words. Ms. Martinez provides her with 30 minutes of small group special education intervention in the resource room 5 days a week. Julia struggles to keep up with her peers in Ms. Herman s core reading instruction in the general education classroom. Let s look more closely at the intervention Julia has received this year. For the first period, the goal was to increase her fluency rate from 55 to 57 wcpm, or one word per week. Intervention strategies were to teach the strategy of re-reading, with a focus on rate. Ms. Martinez notes indicate that Julia liked graphing her progress and making flash cards for sight words and content area words.
16 Take a moment to read through Julia s Collaborative Instructional Log.
17 The teachers agreed that while Julia continued to make slow and steady progress, the rate was maintaining her learning gaps, rather than closing them. The teachers knew she needed more intense intervention; more opportunities for immediate teacher feedback to learn, more practice to reach automaticity, and more research-based strategies, and a smaller group. Take a moment to consider solutions to the problem
18 Ms. Martinez wants to move Julia into a more intensive reading intervention, one that would replace her core reading instruction in the general education classroom. At first, Ms. Herman disagreed, stating that Julia was, after all, making progress. But when Ms. Martinez showed Ms. Herman a chart projecting Julia s rate of progress compared with that needed to reach her goal, Ms. Herman understood the need for urgency. Ms. Martinez showed Ms. Herman the intensive replacement core program. They figured out how Ms. Herman could continue to provide content area vocabulary and text for practice work, so Julia could participate more successfully in science and social studies. Julia would continue to build fluency during Reading Buddy time in Ms. Herman s class. Both teachers will continue to use the Collaborative Instructional Log to communicate with other.
19 Ms. Herman and Ms. Martinez decided to use the CIL to discuss Julia s progress with her mother, including the intervention she had received thus far, and show her the progress chart. They wanted her to understand that Julia needed more specialized instruction to accelerate her progress. The teachers decided to show the same information to the ARD Committee, and to recommend a more intensive course of action to better meet Julia s needs: increase Julia s time with Ms. Martinez in the special education resource room for reading instruction to one hour, replace the core reading program with a specially designed intervention program to address her reading deficits, continue close teacher collaboration to reinforce her learning, and provide fluency practice in the general education classroom during Reading Buddies time. Teachers will also closely monitor Julia s progress and share her progress with her and her mother. In addition, the teachers will recommend another IEP review at the end of the year to determine instructional needs for the summer and for next fall.
20 To review, we ve looked at progress monitoring assessment data for two students, along with logs documenting their special education intervention. One student, Dean, made sufficient progress to be recommended for exit from special education services. The other student, Julia, was not making sufficient progress to close her gaps in learning. In her case, the teachers recommended increasing the time in the resource room, as well as a replacement core reading program. In both cases, the ARD Committees had sufficient information to support their decisions. And in both cases, the RTI information enabled teachers to collaborate and to communicate with parents. 20
21 To summarize, we hope these scenarios provided you with an understanding about the relationship of RTI concepts and IEP requirements in IDEA RTI data is a rich source of information for ARD committees as they develop students IEPs. In addition, you examined how two teachers used a collaborative tool to communicate information for their instructional decision making and with the students parents. 21
23 Thank you for joining our presentation! If you have additional questions, please contact us! 23
District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools Reading Well By Third Grade Plan For Ada-Borup Public Schools Drafted April 2012 Literacy Team: Alayna Wagner- RTI Leader, Second Grade Teacher Jordan Johnson- RTI
The Response to Intervention of English Language Learners At- Risk for Reading Problems Sylvia Linan-Thompson Sharon Vaughn Kathryn Prater Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts at The University
Matching Intervention to Need and Documentation of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions Bismarck Public Schools 2012-2013 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Tools are Online
Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring? Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar, What Is Progress Monitoring? This is one of 11 webinars developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI). This
2222 West Braker Lane Austin, Texas 78758 MAIN OFFICE 512.454.4816 TOLL-FREE 800.315.3876 FAX 512.323.0902 How to Request an Initial Evaluation for Special Education Eligibility If you or someone you know
What is Response to Intervention (RTI)? How does it work in schools with Inclusion? Pamela Bell, Ph.D. Universidade do Minho Braga, Portugal May 2015 2015 University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency
Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification # Watch for a blue box in top right corner for page references from the Colorado
Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework. This is one of 11 webinars that we have developed at
The Role of the PLAAFP in the IEP Present Levels of Academic and Functional Performance Pam Loper ESC 14 Center for Teaching and Learning email@example.com 325-675-8633 1 OBJECTIVES Gain an understanding
GUIDELINES FOR THE IEP TEAM DATA COLLECTION & Progress Monitoring Decisions about the effectiveness of an intervention must be based on data, not guesswork. Frequent, repeated measures of progress toward
READ TO ACHIEVE GRANT APPLICATION COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS NARRATIVE: PROPOSED GRANT INTERVENTION -This section can be NO MORE THAN 30 pages total. NO PAGE NUMBER NO PAGE NUMBER MAXIMUM OF 30 PAGES
Crockett Elementary Response to Intervention Guide 1 Response to Intervention Tier 1 80-90% of students will experience success in Tier 1 Classroom instruction Use a variety of supports as soon as student
WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A The purpose of Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs is to ensure that children in high-poverty schools meet challenging State academic content and student achievement
TITLE: NUMBER: MEM- 5738.3 ISSUER: Elementary Guidelines for Reading Assessment and Screening Procedures for Intensive (Tier 3) Instruction and Interventions at Grades 4, 5, and 6 (as applicable) Gerardo
DRAFT RtI Response to Intervention A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success Guide Document TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Four Essential Components of RtI... 2 Component 1... 3 Component 2...
7 Setting Individual RTI Academic Performance Goals for the Off-Level Student Using Research Norms Students with significant academic deficits can present particular challenges as teachers attempt to match
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished 1a Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy The RS makes no use of a scope and sequence of
Response to Intervention Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What is at the heart of RtI? The purpose of RtI is to provide all students with the best opportunities to succeed in school, identify students
Nevis Public School District #308 District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, 2011 2015-2016 Learning together... Achieving quality together. SCHOOL BOARD Chairperson: Vice Chairperson: Treasurer:
The ABCs of RTI in Elementary School: A Guide for Families November 2012 National Center on Response to Intervention http://www.rti4success.org About the National Center on Response to Intervention Through
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY 24:05:24.01:18. Specific learning disability defined. Specific learning disability is a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding
mclass :RTI User Guide 2015 Amplify Education, Inc. All trademarks and copyrights are the property of Amplify or its licensors. Corporate: 55 Washington Street, Suite 900, Brooklyn, NY 11201-1071 Amplify
Spring School Psychologist RTI² Training Q &A Clarification on the use of the Gap Analysis Worksheet: As part of the RTI² decision making process, teams meet to review a student s rate of improvement to
Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs Special Populations Tennessee Department of Education Sullivan County Teacher Training July 2014 Norms Please sit with your identified group there is a purpose.
Three Critical Success Factors for Reading Intervention and Effective Prevention Elizabeth Brooke, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Vice President of Education and Research, Lexia Learning Strong fundamental literacy skills
Voyager Passport Targeted Reading Intervention for Students in Grades K-6 Reading results. Imagine the possibilities. You can make a diff The Reality of Illiteracy According to recent statistics, the average
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers U.S. Department of Education 1 As Response to Intervention, or RTI expands across the country, the question we at
Peebles Elementary Special Needs Policy Drafted March 2014 Philosophy We believe that all learners have unique needs. We believe that all stakeholders share a responsibility to intervene with effective
AISD K-5 ACCELERATED READING AND MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION EVALUATION, 2004-2005 Austin Independent School District Department of Program Evaluation December 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 78 th Texas Legislature
Elementary Language Arts Overview of Courses and Opportunities STRAND TIER 1 TIER 2 TIER 3 Planning Instruction and Experiences for All s Technology Integration What is the Literacy Diet? (Reader s Workshop
MSE Special Reading K-12 36 Hour Additional Missouri Certification Summer 2015-9 hours Counseling and Collaboration 5/4/15-6/7/15 Techniques with Children, Families, and Teachers from a Biblical Worldview
Parent Resource Center Literacy Presentation September 19 th and 20 th Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) 1. How can you evaluate a grade level child and get individual and additional support? All students
Writing Standards Aligned IEPs: At a Glance The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004) requires that students with disabilities have access to the general education
Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses Standards and Procedures for Identification of Students with Suspected Specific Learning Disabilities March, 2010 Table of Contents Patterns of Strengths and Weaknesses
Eligibility / Staffing Determination EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE Date of Meeting: Student Name: DOB: Soc. Sec.#: The basis for making the determination of whether the student has a disability which meets the
Progress Monitoring and RTI System What is AIMSweb? Our Reports Provide: AYP/NCLB Risk Category Reporting and rates of progress by type of instructional program or risk group include these demographics
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTI²) June 2016 Tie Hodack & Susan Jones Tennessee Department of Education Districts and schools in Tennessee will exemplify excellence
Middle School Special Education Progress Monitoring and Goal- Setting Procedures Section 1: General Guidelines A. How do I determine the areas in which goals are needed? a) Initial/Re- evaluation IEP s:
A Parent s Guide to Response-to-Intervention illions of school age children experience difficulties with learning. Their struggles in school may be due to factors such as inadequate instruction, cultural
Comprehension Intervention Strategy Click or Clunk? For: Any student in Grades 2 and up who is below benchmark/target on the AIMSweb Oral Reading Fluency CBM or MAZE and/or who exhibits comprehension issues
Responsiveness to Intervention Tertiary Intervention Using Progress Monitoring With Intensive Services Pamela M. Stecker In a Responsiveness-lo-lntervention [RTI] model, successive levels of instructional
Fluency Formula: Oral Fluency Assessment IMPACT STUDY Fluency Formula: Oral Fluency Assessment A Successful Plan for Raising Reading Achievement 1 Table of Contents The Challenge: To Have 90% of Students
Preventing Reading Difficulties Among Spanish-Speaking Children Sharon Vaughn, Ph.D. Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin David Francis, Ph.D. University of Houston Program Project
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION 1 RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING WITH FIDELITY by Jill Radosta SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN
Plan Overview UTAH VIRTUAL ACADEMY (5F05F) Salt Lake County 2012 Plan Overview Plan Item 1) K 3rd Grade Literacy Students in K 3rd grades will improve proficiency in phonemic awareness, alphabetic principle,
Language Reading Connection Collaborating with Your SLP WELCOME! What is Project CENTRAL? Coordinating g Existing g Networks To Reach All Learners The ultimate goals are to provide professional development
SUCCEEDING IN READING: AN EARLY LITERACY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK APRIL 26, 2011 SUCCEEDING IN READING: AN EARLY LITERACY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW The Department of Education has established a framework
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) School Based Team/Problem-Solving Team & Response to Intervention (RtI) Procedural Manual THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY Single School Culture Initiatives
Best Practices Using Lexia Software to Drive Reading Achievement An overview of Implementation Principles to apply in your school for using Lexia Reading Skills Software to Close the Reading Achievement
TIER 1 LITERACY INSTRUCTION FOR ELLS Session Goals RTI Groundwork Examining Assessment Systems Data Analysis and Instructional Design Advancing your RTI Model 1. Discuss best practices for Tier 1 literacy
Legislative Study Session 9/27/2010 LynneD SpillerEdD Creighton School District Spiller, L. (2010). The What Works Panel: Creighton School District Legislative Study Session. Presented at the Arizona K
Establishing a Screening Process Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar Establishing a Screening Process. This is one of 11 webinars developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI) for the
Ongoing Progress Monitoring Across All Tiers of Support MDCPS Office of Academics, Accountability and School Improvement 2013-2014 Ongoing Progress Monitoring (OPM) Across All Tiers of Support PROGRESS
BUILDING CURRICULUM ACCOMMODATION PLAN 2014-2015 ERIC STARK, PRINCIPAL KATE PERETZ, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much. Helen Keller FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS VISION
Understanding the Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Many states and local school districts are embracing a new approach to developing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for students
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DPS: 2013-56 DATE: November 21, 2013 Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education Technical Assistance Paper Third-Grade Student Progression Summary: The purpose of this Technical
Selecting and Exiting Students Read 180 Program Springfield School District Introduction: The purpose of the following guidelines is to ensure that students most likely to benefit from Read 180 are selected
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Speech-Language Pathologists Definition of an Effective Speech-Language Pathologist Effective speech-language pathologists are
Reading Results with Proven Effective Jamestown Reading Navigator is the first comprehensive reading intervention program designed exclusively for middle and high school students. The program addresses
NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS TEST DESIGN AND FRAMEWORK DRAFT July 2013 This document is a working draft. The information in this document is subject to change, and any changes will
RISS RtI Needs Assessment and Planning Process RISS RtI Project Summary The RISS (Response to Intervention Support System) project was funded in August 2009 with a Maine Department of Education IDEA professional
National Center on Student Progress Monitoring Monitoring Student Progress in Individualized Educational Programs Using Curriculum-Based Measurement Pamela M. Stecker Clemson University Abstract Curriculum-based
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Programs and Services Response to Intervention: The Mississippi Experience Kris Kaase March 12, 2009 March 2009 1 History of RtI in Mississippi
Curriculum and Instruction Department Response to Intervention (RtI) Definition What is Response to Intervention (RtI)? Response to Intervention is designed as a school-wide, tiered model for identifying
Jan/Feb 2007 What Does Research Tell Us About Teaching Reading to English Language Learners? By Suzanne Irujo, ELL Outlook Contributing Writer As a classroom teacher, I was largely ignorant of, and definitely
A Parent s Guide to Response to Intervention (RTI) Millions of school-age children experience difficulties with learning. Their struggles in school may be due to factors such as cultural or language differences,
Drill Down Reading Diagnosis Model Give at least one assessment in each literacy area* until an area of proficiency is reached. Begin an intervention at lowest area of non-proficiency. IF Proficient THEN
Implementing Progress Monitoring Pennsylvania's Statewide Approach Pennsylvania Partnership for Professional Development Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Department of
Unit 4 Module 1: Administering the Texas Middle School Fluency Assessment Section 1 Slide 1 Title Slide Welcome to the first module in the Diagnostic and Progress Monitoring Data unit, Administering the
Wappingers Central School District Response to Intervention Plan (RTI) February 2012 Tier III Tier II Tier I 1 Introduction to WCSD s 3 Tier RTI Model The 3 Tier Response to Intervention (RTI) Model provides
2 An Analysis of Voyager Passport Reading Intervention Program Amanda Schlafke, Summer 2013 A Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirement for a Masters of Science in Education/Reading University
Theme 1 Student Learning/Curriculum and Instruction High expectations are at the heart of the vision for all students in the Revere Public Schools. By embracing the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks,
Fidelity Integrity Assessment (FIA) Version 1.1 SWIFT Center University of Kansas www.swiftschools.org This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs
Updated 11 22 13 Question and Answers about the Illinois Common Core Standards Information Regarding the Illinois Common Core English Language Arts Standards The Illinois Learning Standards, based on the
Sight Words Second Grade Core Knowledge Addendum Dolch Sight Words are naturally embedded in the Core Knowledge Program. They are taught throughout the program in a sequence of instruction, unlike previous
Scientifically Based Reading Programs: What are they and how do I know? Elissa J. Arndt, M.S. CCC-SLP Florida Center for Reading Research Alternate Assessment Summer Training Institute July, 2007 1 Goals
St. Matthias IB MYP Special Needs Policy Vision for Inclusion of the Archdiocese of Chicago The heart and spirit of our Archdiocesan Catholic Schools reveals itself in the faith conviction that all God
Intensive Instruction for Middle School/High School Coaches Academy - August 7-11, 2005 Lila Rissman, M.S., Curriculum Specialist Jennifer Page, M.S., Intervention Teacher The Florida Center for Reading
TRAINGING GUIDE Getting Started To Log in type the web address www.readinga-z.com into your browser. This will open the Reading A-Z home page. Click Members at top right hand corner of the screen. Type
READING SPECIALIST STANDARDS Standard I. Standard II. Standard III. Standard IV. Components of Reading: The Reading Specialist applies knowledge of the interrelated components of reading across all developmental
Training Goals: Understand the student online experience. Learn how to access real-time student data to plan instruction. Determine how to help struggling students with teacher-led Lexia Lessons, targeted
Overview of Reports - Overview 7.0 Overview of Reports Overview After data has been Submitted to the PMRN, reports will become available. Most reports in the PMRN display student assessment data, to include
Sight Words First Grade Core Knowledge Addendum Dolch Sight Words are naturally embedded in the Core Knowledge Program. They are taught throughout the program in a sequence of instruction, unlike previous
Determining & Writing Effective IEP Goals The whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Aristotle Assumptions IEP development is a planning process it is more than filling out a form. Connecting IEPs
1 REVISOR 8710.4925 8710.4925 READING LEADER. Subpart 1. Scope of practice. A reading leader is authorized to facilitate and provide site-based or districtwide leadership for kindergarten through grade
2014-15 Response to Intervention/ Student Support Team Manual Department of Psychological Services Preface One of the primary objectives of Psychological Services is to provide supportive assistance to
Using Direct Instruction Programs as Intervention Programs in Grades K 3 Direct Instruction News Volume 5, Number 2 Summer 2005 Introduction This article is about the use of Direct Instruction as an intervention