Jumpadapted discretization schemes for Lévydriven SDEs


 Justin Small
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Jumpadapted discretization schemes for Lévydriven SDEs Arturo KohatsuHiga Osaka University Graduate School of Engineering Sciences Machikaneyama cho 3, Osaka , Japan Peter Tankov Ecole Polytechnique Centre de Mathématiques Appliquées 928 Palaiseau Cedex France Abstract We present new algorithms for weak approximation of stochastic differential equations driven by pure jump Lévy processes. The method is built upon adaptive nonuniform discretization based on the jump times of the driving process coupled with suitable approximations of the solutions between these jump times. Our technique avoids the costly simulation of the increments of the Lévy process and in many cases achieves better convergence rates than the traditional schemes with equal time steps. To illustrate the method, we consider applications to simulation of portfolio strategies and option pricing in the Libor market model with jumps. Key words: Lévydriven stochastic differential equation, Euler scheme, jumpadapted discretization, weak approximation, Libor market model with jumps. 2 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 6H35, Secondary 65C5, 6G5. Introduction Let Z be a ddimensional Lévy process without diffusion component, that is, Z t = γt + y N(dy, ds) + y y > Corresponding author yn(dy, ds), t,.
2 Here γ d, N is a Poisson random measure on d, ) with intensity ν satisfying y 2 ν(dy) < and N(dy, ds) = N(dy, ds) ν(dy)ds denotes the compensated version of N. Further, let X be an n valued adapted stochastic process, unique solution of the stochastic differential equation X t = X + h(x s )dz s, t,, () where h is an n d matrix. The traditional uniformlyspaced discretization schemes for () 5, suffer from two difficulties: first, in general, we do not know how to simulate the driving Lévy process and second, a large jump of Z occurring between two discretization points can lead to an important discretization error. On the other hand, in many cases of interest, the Lévy measure of Z is known and one can easily simulate the jumps of Z bigger in absolute value than a certain >. As our benchmark example, consider the onedimensional tempered stable Lévy process 5 which has the Lévy density ν(x) = C e λ x x +α x< + C +e λ+ x x +α+ x>. (2) This process, also known as the CGMY model 3 when C = C + and α = α +, is a popular representation for the logarithm of stock price in financial markets. No easy algorithm is available for simulating the increments of this process (cf 2, 4), however, it is straightforward to simulate random variables with density ν(x) x > x > ν(x)dx (3) using the rejection method 5, example 6.9. Sometimes, other approximations of Z by a compound Poisson process, such as the series representations 6 lead to simpler simulation algorithms. A natural idea due to ubenthaler 7 (in the context of finiteintensity jump processes, this idea appears also in 2, 3), is to replace the process Z with a suitable compound Poisson approximation and place the discretization points at the jump times of the compound Poisson process. When the jumps of Z are highly concentrated around zero, however, this approximation is too rough and can lead to convergence rates which are arbitrarily slow. In this paper we are interested in approximating the solution of () in the weak sense. We use the idea of Asmussen and osiński (see also 4) and replace the small jumps of Z with a Brownian motion between the jump times of the compound Poisson approximation. We then replace the solution of the continuous SDE between the jump times by a suitable approximation, which is explicitly computable. Combined, these two steps lead to a much lower discretization error than in 7. If N is the average number of operations required to simulate a single trajectory, the discretization error of our method converges 2
3 to zero faster than N in all cases and faster than N if the Lévy measure of Z is locally symmetric near zero. In practice, the convergence rates are always better than these worstcase bounds: for example, if α = α + =.8 in (2), our method has the theoretical convergence rate of N.22 (compared to only N. without the Brownian approximation) and when α = α + =.5, the rate of our method is N 7. Consider a family of measurable functions (χ ) > : d, such that χ d (y)ν(dy) < and y > y 2 ( χ )(y)ν(dy) < for all > and lim χ (y) = for all y. The Lévy measure ν will be approximated by finite measures χ ν. The most simple such approximation is χ (y) := y >, but others can also be useful (see Example 7 below). We denote by N a Poisson random measure with intensity χ ν ds and by N its compensated Poisson random measure. Similarly, we denote by N the compensated Poisson random measure with intensity χ ν ds, where χ := χ. The process Z can then be represented in law as follows: d Z t = γ t + Zt + t, γ = γ yχ ν(dy) + Z t = t = y yn (dy, ds), d y N (dy, ds). d y > y χ ν(dy), We denote by λ = χ d ν(dy) the intensity of Z, by (Nt ) the Poisson process which has the same jump times as Z, and by Ti, i N, the jump times of Z. Furthermore, we denote by Σ the variancecovariance matrix of : Σ ij = y i y j χ ν(dy), d and in the onedimensional case we set σ 2 := Σ. Sometimes we shall use the following technical assumption on (χ ): (A) n 2, C such that z n+ χ ν(dz) C z n χ ν(dz) d d for sufficiently small. This assumption, roughly, means that the approximation (χ ) does not remove small jumps faster than big jumps, and it is clearly satisfied by χ (y) = y >. for the process (3) this corresponds to having α + = α and C + = C 3
4 Supposing that no further discretization is done between the jump times of Z, the computational complexity of simulating a single approximate trajectory is proportional to the random number N. To compare our method to the traditional equallyspaced discretizations, we measure instead the computational complexity by the average number of jumps of Z on,, equal to λ. We say that the approximation ˆX converges weakly for some order α > if, for a sufficiently smooth function f, Ef(X ) Ef( ˆX ) Kλ α for some K > and all sufficiently small. In this paper, we provide two versions of the jumpadapted discretization scheme for pure jump Lévy processes. The scheme presented in Section 2 is easier to use and implement but works in the case d = n =. A fully general scheme is then presented in Section 3. Section 4 presents two detailed examples where our method is applied to the problems of long term portfolio simulation and of option pricing in the Libor market model with jumps. 2 Onedimensional SDE For our first scheme we take d = n = and consider the ordinary differential equation dx t = h(x t )dt, X = x. (4) In the onedimensional case, the solution to this equation can always be written: X t := θ(t; x) = F (t + F(x)), where F is the primitive of h(x). Alternatively, a highorder discretization scheme (such as ungekutta) can be used and is easy to construct (see also emark 4). We define inductively ˆX() = X and for i, ˆX(T i+ ) = θ( γ (T i+ T i ) + σ (W(T i+ ) W(T i )) 2 h (XT i )σ 2 (T i+ T i ); ˆX(T i )) (5) ˆX(T i ) = ˆX(T i ) + h( ˆX(T i )) Z(T i ). (6) Similarly, for any other point t (Ti, T i+ ), we define ˆX(t) = θ ( γ (t η t ) + σ (W(t) W(η t )) 2 h ( ˆX(η t ))σ 2 (t η t ); ˆX(η t ) ), (7) where we set η t := sup{ti : Ti t}. Here W denotes a one dimensional Brownian motion. Therefore, the idea is to replace the original equation with an Asmussen osiński type approximation which is explicitly solvable between the times of 4
5 big jumps and is exact for all h if the driving process is deterministic, and for affine h in all cases. The purpose of this construction becomes clear from the following lemma. Lemma. Let h C. The process ( ˆX(t)) defined by (5) (7) is the solution of the stochastic differential equation { d ˆX t = h( ˆX t ) dzt + σ dw t + γ dt + } 2 (h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) ))σdt 2. Proof. It is enough to show that the process Y t := θ(γ t + σ W t 2 h (x)σ 2 t; x) (8) is the solution of the continuous SDE dy t = h(y t ) {σ dw t + γ dt + 2 } (h (Y t ) h (x))σ 2 dt. This follows by an application of Itô formula to (8) using θ(t, z) = h(θ(t, z)) t 2 θ(t, z) t 2 = h (θ(t, z))h(θ(t, z)). For the convergence analysis, we introduce two sets of conditions (parameterized by an integer number n): (H n ) f C n, h C n, f (k) and h (k) are bounded for k n and z 2n ν(dz) <. (H n) f C n, h C n, h (k) are bounded for k n, f (k) have at most polynomial growth for k n and z k ν(dz) < for all k. Theorem 2. (i) Assume (H 3 ) or (H 3) + (A). Then ( Ef( ˆX σ 2 ) ) f(x ) C (σ 2 λ + γ ) + y 3 χ ν(dy). (ii) Assume (H 4 ) or (H 4 ) + (A), let γ be bounded and let the measure ν satisfy y 3 χ ν(dy) y 4 χ ν (dy) (9) 5
6 for some measure ν. Then ( Ef( ˆX σ 2 ) ) f(x ) C (σ 2 + γ ) + y 4 χ (ν + ν)(dy) λ and in particular, Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) C ( σ 2 ) + y 4 χ (ν + ν)(dy). λ emark 3. (i)under the polynomial growth assumptions (H 3 ) or (H 4 ), the constants in the above theorem may depend on the initial value x. (ii) Condition (9) is satisfied, for example, if χ (y) = χ ( y) for all y and and if ν is locally symmetric near zero. That is, ν(dy) = (+ξ(y))ν (dy), where ν is a symmetric measure and ξ(y) = O(y) for y. emark 4. The convergence rates given in Theorem 2 are obtained under the assumption that the equation (4) is solved explicitly. If a discretization scheme is used for this equation as well, the total error will be bounded from below by the error of this scheme. However, usually this constraint is not very important since it is easy to construct a discretization scheme for (4) with a high convergence order, for example, the classical ungekutta scheme has convergence order 4. Corollary 5 (Worstcase convergence rates). Let χ (x) = x >. Then, under the conditions of part (i) of Theorem 2, Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) o(λ 2 ), and under the conditions of part (ii) of Theorem 2, Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) o(λ ). Proof. These worstcase bounds follow from the following estimates. First, for every Lévy process, σ as. By the dominated convergence theorem, 2 λ as. This implies λ y 3 ν(dy) 2 λ σ 2 and similarly λ y y y 4 ν(dy) 2 λ σ 2. Example 6 (Stablelike behavior). Once again, let χ (x) = x >, and assume that the Lévy measure has an αstablelike behavior near zero, meaning that ν has a density ν(z) satisfying ν(z) = g(z) z +α, 6
7 where g has finite nonzero right and left limits at zero as, for example, for the tempered stable process (CGMY) 5. Then σ 2 = O( 2 α ), λ = O( α ), y 3 ν(dy) = O( 3 α ) and y 4 ν(dy) = O( 4 α ), y so that in general for α (, 2) y Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) O(λ 3 α ), and if the Lévy measure is locally symmetric near zero and α (, ), Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) O(λ 4 α ). Example 7 (Simulation using series representation). In this example we explain why it can be useful to make other choices of truncation than χ (x) = x >. The gamma process has Lévy density ν(z) = ce λz z z>. If one uses the truncation function χ (x) = x >, one will need to simulate random variables with law ce λz zν((, )) z>, which may be costly. Instead, one can use one of the many series representations for the gamma process 6. Maybe the most convenient one is X t = λ e Γi/c V i Ui t, i= where (Γ i ) is a sequence of jump times of a standard Poisson process, (U i ) is an independent sequence of independent random variables uniformly distributed on, and (V i ) is an independent sequence of independent standard exponential random variables. For every τ >, the truncated sum X t = λ e Γi/c V i Ui t, i:γ i<τ defines a compound Poisson process with Lévy density ν τ (x) = c e λx e λxeτ/c x>, x and therefore this series representation corresponds to χ (x) = e λx(eτ/c ), where can be linked to τ, for example, by setting τ =. Theorem 2 will be proved after a series of lemmas. Lemma 8 (Bounds on moments of X and ˆX). Assume z p ν(dz) < for some p 2, 7
8 h C () and h(x) K( + x ) and h (x) K for some K <. Then there exists a constant C > (which may depend on p but not on ) such that E sup X s p C( + x p ), () s E sup ˆX s p C( + x p ). () s Proof. We shall concentrate on the bound (), the other one will follow by making go to zero. We have with ˆX t = x + γ t = γ + Z t = σ W t + z > h( ˆX s ) γ s ds + h( ˆX s )d Z s zν(dz) + 2 σ2 {h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) )}, z ˆN (dz, ds). Observe that γ t is bounded uniformly on t and on. Using a predictable version of the BurkholderDavisGundy inequality 6, lemma 2., we then obtain for t and for some constant C < which may change from line to line E sup ˆX s p CE x p + s t ( + h 2 ( ˆX s )(σ 2 + CE x p + h( ˆX s ) p γ s p ds z 2 χ ν(dz))ds) p/2 + h( ˆX s ) p ds CE + x p + h( ˆX s ) p ds The bound () now follows from Gronwall s inequality. ˆX s p ds. z p χ ν(dz) Lemma 9 (Derivatives of the flow). Let p 2 and for an integer n assume z np ν(dz) <, h C n () and h(x) K( + x ) and h (k) (x) K for some K < and all k with k n. Then k p E T < for all k with k n. x k X(t,x) 8
9 Proof. See the proof of lemma 4.2 in 5. Lemma. Let u(t, x) := E (t,x) f(x T ). (i) Assume (H n ) with n 2. Then u C,n (, ), k u are uniformly x k bounded for k n and u is a solution of the equation ( u u (t, x) + γ (t, x)h(x) + u(t, x + h(x)y) u(t, x) u ) (t, x)h(x)y ν(dy) t x y x + (u(t, x + h(x)y) u(t, x)) ν (dy) = (2) y > u(, x) = f(x). (ii) Assume (H n ) with n 2. Then u C,n (, ), u is a solution of equation (2) and there exist C < and p > with k u(t, x) x k C( + x p ) for all t,, x and k n. Proof. The derivative u x satisfies u(t, x) x = E f (X (t,x) T ) x X(t,x) T The interchange of the derivative and the expectation is justified using lemma 9. The boundedness under (H n ) or the polynomial growth under (H n) then follow from lemmas 8 and 9. The other derivatives with respect to x are obtained by successive differentiations under the expectation. The derivative with respect to t is obtained from Itô s formula applied to f(x (t,x) T. Z is a Lévy process and h does not depend on t, Ef(X (t,x) T and hence it is sufficient to study the derivative Ef(X(,x) t yields Ef(X t ) = f(x) + E + E f (X s )h(x s )dz s ). In fact, note that since ) = Ef(X (,x) t ) T t ). The Itô formula {f(x s + h(x s )z) f(x s ) f (X s )h(x s )z}n(dz, ds). Denoting by Z the martingale part of Z and by γ := γ + zν(dz) the z > residual drift, and using lemma 8, we get Ef(X t ) = f(x) + ds γef (X s )h(x s ) + dse {f(x s + h(x s )z) f(x s ) f (X s )h(x s )z}ν(dz), 9
10 and therefore = γef (X t )h(x t ) + E Ef(X t ) t = γef (X t )h(x t ) + {f(x t + h(x t )z) f(x t ) f (X t )h(x t )z}ν(dz) dθe ( θ)h 2 (X t )z 2 2 f(x t + θzh(x t )) ν(dz). Now, once again, lemma 8 allows to prove the finiteness of this expression. Finally, equation (2) is a consequence of Itô s formula applied, this time, to u(t, X t ). Lemma. Let f :, ), ) be an increasing function. Then E f(t η(t))dt Ef(τ), where τ is an exponential random variable with intensity λ. In particular, E (t η(t)) p+ (p + )! dt λ p+. Proof. Let k = sup{k : Tk < }. Then k T i E f(t η(t))dt = E = E E i= k Ti T i i= Ti k T i i= = E T i x 2 f(t Ti )dt + f(t T k )dt T k f(t i t)dt + f(t i t)dt + f(inf{t i : T i > t} t)dt T k f( t)dt f(t k+ t)dt T k = Ef(τ). The second statement of the lemma is a direct consequence of the first one. Proof of theorem 2. From Itô s formula and lemmas 8 and, Ef( ˆX ) f(x ) = Eu(, ˆX ) u(, X ) 2 u(t, = dte ˆX t ) 2 x 2 σh 2 2 ( ˆX t ) χ ν(dy)(u(t, ˆX t + h( ˆX t )y) u(t, ˆX t ) u(t, ˆX t ) + dte 2 σ2 u(t, ˆX t ) h( x ˆX t )(h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) )) x h( ˆX t )y) (3). (4)
11 Denote the expectation in (3) by A t and the one in (4) by B t. From lemmas and 8, we then have, under the hypothesis (H 3 ), A t E 2 y3 h 3 ( ˆX t ) χ ( θ) 2 3 u(t, ˆX t + θyh( ˆX t )) x 3 dθν(dy) CE + h 3 ( ˆX t ) y 3 χ ν(dy) C( + x 3 ) y 3 χ ν(dy). If, instead, the polynomial growth condition (H 3 ) is satisfied, then for some p >, A t CE y 3 ( + h 3 ( ˆX t ))( + ˆX t p + yh( ˆX t ) p ) χ ν(dy) and once again, we use lemma 8 together with the assumption (A), because the Lévy measure is now supposed integrable with any power of y. Under the condition of part (ii) and the hypothesis (H 4 ), A t E 3 u(t, ˆX t ) x 3 h 3 ( ˆX t ) y 3 χ ν(dy) + E 24 y4 h 4 ( ˆX t ) C( + x 4 ) y 4 χ (ν + ν)(dy). ( θ) 3 4 u(t, ˆX t + θyh( ˆX t )) x 4 dθ χ ν(dy) The case of (H 4) is treated as above. To analyze the term B t, define H(t, x) = u(t, x) h(x) x and assume, to fix the notation, that (H 3 ) is satisfied. Then, once again by
12 lemmas and 8, Taylor formula and the CauchySchwartz inequality, B t 2 σ2 E(H(t, ˆX t ) H(t, ˆX η(t) ))(h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) )) + 2 σ2 E H(t, ˆX η(t) )(h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) )) 2 σ2 E ( ˆX t ˆX η(t) ) 2 dθ H x ( ˆX η(t) + θ( ˆX t ˆX η(t) )) + 2 σ2 E H(t, ˆX η(t) )E dθ h ( ˆX η(t) + θ ( ˆX t ˆX η(t) )) (h ( ˆX t ) h ( ˆX η(t) )) F η(t) Cσ 2 E( ˆX t ˆX η(t) ) 2 ( + ˆX t + ˆX η(t) ) + 2 σ2 EH(t, ˆX η(t) )h ( ˆX η(t) )E ˆX t ˆX η(t) F η(t) + 2 σ2 E H(t, ˆX η(t) )( ˆX t ˆX η(t) ) 2 dθ( θ)h (3) ( ˆX η(t) + θ( ˆX t ˆX η(t) )) CσE( 2 ˆX t ˆX η(t) ) 4 /2 + 2 σ2 EH(t, ˆX η(t) )h ( ˆX η(t) )E ˆX t ˆX η(t) F η(t). Note that ˆX t ˆX η(t) = E ˆX t ˆX η(t) F η(t) = E η(t) (5) { h( ˆX s ) σ dw s + γ ds + } 2 (h ( ˆX s ) h ( ˆX ηs ))σds 2, h( ˆX s ) {γ ds + 2 } (h ( ˆX s ) h ( ˆX ηs ))σ 2 ds F η(t). η(t) The BurkholderDavisGundy inequality and, the CauchySchwartz inequality and lemma 8 then give, under the hypothesis (H 3 ): E( ˆX t ˆX η(t) ) 4 CE h( ˆX s ) {γ ds + 2 } (h ( ˆX s ) h ( ˆX 4 ηs ))σ 2 ds η(t) ( ) 2 t + Cσ 4 E h 2 ( ˆX s )ds η(t) C( γ + σ 2 )4 E(t η(t)) 4 ( + sup ˆX) 4 + Cσ 4 E(t η(t))2 ( + sup ˆX) 4 C( γ + σ 2 )4 E(t η(t)) Cσ 4 E(t η(t)) 4 2. Similarly, for the second term in (5), we get 2 σ2 EH(t, ˆX η(t) )h ( ˆX η(t) )E ˆX t ˆX η(t) F η(t) Cσ 2 ( γ + σ 2 )E(t η(t))2 2. 2
13 Assembling together the estimates for the two terms in (5), B t Cσ 2 (( γ +σ 2 )2 E(t η(t)) 8 2 +σ 2 E(t η(t)) 4 2 +( γ +σ 2 )E(t η(t))2 2 ) Using the Jensen inequality and lemma, this is further reduced to ( B t dt Cσ 2 ( γ + σ 2)2 + γ + σ 2 ). λ From the CauchySchwartz inequality we get ( ) 2 y χ ν(dy) λ y 2 χ ν(dy) Cλ, y y which implies that γ C λ and finally B Cσ 2 λ. Assembling these estimates with the ones for A, we complete the proof under the assumptions (H 3 ) (or (H 4 )). Under the assumptions (H 3) or (H 4) the proof is done in a similar fashion. λ 4 γ +σ 2 3 Approximating multidimensional SDE using expansions In this section we propose an alternative approximation scheme, which yields similar rates to the ones obtained in section 2 but has the advantage of being applicable in the multidimensional case. On the other hand, it is a little more difficult to implement. As before, we start by replacing the small jumps of Z with a suitable Brownian motion, yielding the SDE d X t = h( X t ){γ dt + dwt + dz t }, (6) where W is a ddimensional Brownian motion with covariance matrix Σ. This process can also be written as X(t) = X(η t ) + h ( ) X(s) dw (s) + η t X(T i ) = X(T i ) + h( X(T i )) Z(T i ). η t h ( X(s) ) γ ds, The idea now is to expand the solution of (6) between the jumps of Z around the solution of the deterministic dynamical system (4), treating the stochastic term as a small random perturbation (see 8, Chapter 2). Assume that the coefficient h is Lipschitz and consider a family of processes (Y α ) α defined by Y α (t) = X(η t ) + α h (Y α (s)) dw (s) + η t h (Y α (s))γ ds η t 3
14 Our idea is to replace the process X := Y with its firstorder Taylor approximation: X(t) Y (t) + α Y α (t) α=. Therefore, the new approximation X is defined by X(t) = Y (t) + Y (t), t > η t, X(T i ) = X(T i ) + h( X(T i )) Z(Ti ), Y (t) = X(η t ) + Y (t) = η t η t h(y (t))γ ds (7) h x i (Y (s)) Y i (s)γ ds + η t h (Y (s)) dw (s) where we used the Einstein convention for summation over repeated indices. Conditionally on the jump times (Ti ) i, the random vector Y (t) is Gaussian with mean zero. Applying the integration by parts formula to Y i(t)y j (t), it can be shown that its covariance matrix Ω(t) satisfies the (matrix) linear equation Ω(t) = η t (Ω(s)M(s) + M (s)ω (s) + N(s))ds (8) where M denotes the transpose of the matrix M and M ij (t) = h ik(y (t)) x j γ k and N(t) = h(y (t))σ h (Y (t)). Successive applications of Gronwall s inequality yield the following bounds for Y and Ω: Y (t) ( Y (η t ) + C γ (t η t )) e C γ (t ηt) Ω(t) C Σ (t η t )( + Y (η t ) 2 )e C γ (+ γ )(t ηt). (9) Lemma 2. Assume ν( d ) =. Then γ 2 lim =. λ Proof. Left to the reader as an exercise. To prove Theorem 4, we need to generalize lemmas 8, 9 and to the multidimensional setting. While the generalization of the last two lemmas is straightforward, the first one requires a little work, because it needs to be adapted to the new discretization scheme. Lemma 3 (Bounds on moments of X). Assume ν( d ) =, h C b (n ) and z d z p ν(dz) < for some p 2. 4
15 Then there exists a constant C > (which may depend on p but not on ) such that for all sufficiently small, E sup X s p C( + x p ). (2) s Proof. Denote h t := h( X t ) and h t := h(y (t)). The SDE for X can be rewritten as d X t = h t d Z t + h t dwt + h t γdt + ( h t h t )γ dt + h (Y (t)) Y x (t)γ i dt, i where Z t = ynˆ (dy, ds), γ = γ + yν(dy). y > y > By predictable BurkholderDavisGundy inequality 6, lemma 2., we then have ( E sup X s p CE x p + h s 2 s t + h s p ds z p χ ν(dz) + + CE ) p/2 z 2 χ ν(dz)ds ( ) p/2 h s 2 Σ ds t h s p γ p ds + γ p h s h s p ds + γ p Y (s) p ds x p + h s p ds + ( + γ p ) t h s h s p ds + γ p Y (s) p ds, where the constant C does not depend on and may change from line to line. Since h is bounded, we have t E sup X s p CE x p + h s p ds + ( + γ p ) Y (s) p ds. s t (2) Using (9), the last term can be estimated as E ( + γ p ) CE ( + γ p ) CE ( + γ p ) CE ( + γ p ) Y (s) p ds = CE ( + γ p ) Ω(s) p/2 ds E Y (s) p F η(s) ds ( + X η(s) ) p ) Σ p/2 (s η s ) p/2 e C γ (+ γ )(s ηs) ds ( + X η(s) ) p ) Σ p/2 τ p/2 e C γ (+ γ )τ ds, 5
16 where τ is an independent exponential random variable with parameter λ. Due to Lemma 2, for sufficiently small, the expectation with respect to τ exists, and computing it explicitly we obtain E ( + γ p ) Y (s) p ds C E ( + X η(s) p )ds, where C as. Inequality (2) therefore becomes t E sup X s p CE x p + h s p ds + C ( + X η(s) p ) s t CE x p + which implies that for sufficiently small, E sup X s p CE + x p + s t and we get (2) by Gronwall s lemma. Theorem 4. h s p ds + C t( + sup X s p ) s t h s p ds, (i) Assume (H 3 ) or (H 3) + (A). Then ( ) Ef( ˆX Σ ) f(x ) C ( Σ + γ ) + y 3 χ ν(dy). λ d (ii) Assume (H 4 ) or (H 4 )+(A), let γ be bounded and suppose that for some measure ν y i y j y k χ ν(dy) d y 4 χ ν (dy) d for all i, j, k and all sufficiently small. Then ( ) Ef( ˆX Σ ) f(x ) C + y 4 χ (ν + ν)(dy). λ d Proof. By Itô formula we have Ef( X ) f(x ) = Eu(, X ) u(, X ) u(t, = dte X(t)) { h ij (Y (t)) + h } ij(y (t)) Y k (t) h ij ( x i x X(t)) γ j (22) k + 2 u( X(t)) h ik (Y (t))σ kl 2 x i x h jl(y (t)) (23) j { u(t, X(t) + h( X(t))y) u(t, X(t)) u(t, X } t ) h ij ( x X(t))y j χ ν(dy). d i (24), 6
17 Denote the expectation term in (22) by A t and the sum of the terms in (23) and (24) by B t. The term A t satisfies u(t, A t CE X(t)) x Y (t) 2 γ Under the assumption (H 4 ) or (H 3 ), using (9), we have A CE Y (t) 2 γ CE Ω(t) γ CE + Y (η t ) 4 /2 Σ γ E(t η t )e C γ (+ γ )(t ηt). Using Lemmas and 3, we then get A t dt C( + x 2 ) Σ γ λ. Under (H 4 ) or (H 3 ) this result can be obtained along the same lines. Let us now turn to the term B t. It is rewritten via B t =E { u(t, X(t) + h( X(t))y) u(t, X(t)) d 2 u(t, X t ) x i x j h ik ( X(t))h jl ( X(t))y k y l } χ ν(dy) u(t, X(t)) h ij ( x X(t))y j i { Σ kl h ik (Y (t))h jl (Y (t)) h ik ( X(t))h jl ( X(t)) } ) + 2 u(t, Y (t)) x i x j ( 2 u(t, + X(t)) 2 u(t, Y (t)) x i x j x i x j { Σ kl h ik (Y (t))h jl (Y (t)) h ik ( X(t))h jl ( X(t)) } Denote the first two lines by B (t), the third line by B 2 (t) and the fourth by B 3 (t). Under the hypotheses (H 4 ) or (H 3 ), we get 3 u(t, X t + θh( X(t))y) B (t) E h il ( x d i x j k X(t))h jm ( X t )h kn ( X(t))y l y m y n χ ν(dy) CE h( X t ) 3 y 3 χ ν(dy) C( + x 3 ) y 3 χ ν(dy). d d Let F ikjl (x) := h ik (x)h jl (x). Using the fact that conditionally on F ηt, Y is a centered Gaussian process, B 2 (t) E 2 u(t, Y (t)) Σ kl {F x i x ikjl (Y (t)) F ikjl ( X(t)) F } ηt j E 2 u(t, Y (t)) Σ kl x i x (t)y q (t) ( θ) 2 F ikjl (Y (t) + θy (t)) dθ j x p x q CE Σ Y (t) 2 ( + sup X s ) s. 7
18 Using once again Lemmas and 3, we obtain B 2 dt C( + x ) Σ 2 λ. With a similar reasoning we obtain that B 3 also satisfies B 3 dt C( + x ) Σ 2 λ. The proof of the first part of the theorem under assumptions (H 4 ) or (H 3 ) is done along the same lines. 4 Applications Stochastic models driven by Lévy processes are gaining increasing popularity in financial mathematics, where they offer a much more realistic description of the underlying risks than the traditional diffusionbased models. In this context, many quantities of interest are given by solutions of stochastic differential equations which cannot be solved explicitly. In this paper we consider two such applications: portfolio management with constraints and the Libor market model with jumps. Onedimensional SDE: portfolio management with constraints The value V t of a portfolio in various common portfolio management strategies can often be expressed as solution to SDE. One example is the socalled Constant Proportion Portfolio Insurance (CPPI) strategy which aims at maintaining the value of the portfolio above some prespecified guaranteed level B t and consists in investing m(v t B t ) into the risky asset S t and the remaining amount into the riskfree bond, where B t is the timet value of the guarantee: dv t = m(v t B t ) ds t S t + (V t m(v t B t ))rdt. For simplicity we shall suppose that the guarantee is the value of a zerocoupon bond expiring at time t with nominal amount N = : B t = e r(t t) N. This equation can then easily be solved analytically, but often additional constraints imposed on the portfolio make the analytic solution impossible. For instance, often leverage is not allowed, and the portfolio dynamics becomes dv t = min(v t, m(v t B t )) ds t S t + (V t min(v t, m(v t B t )))rdt. Suppose that the stock S follows an exponential Lévy model: dz t = ds t S t rdt, (25) 8
19 where Z is a purejump Lévy process, and let Vt = Vt B t be the value of the portfolio computed using B t as numéraire. Equation (25) can be simplified to dv t = min(v t, m(v t ))dz t. (26) This equation cannot be solved explicitly, but the corresponding deterministic ODE dx t = min(x t, m(x t ))dt admits a simple explicit solution for m > : if x Otherwise, for < x < m m X t = xe t. m m then X t = + (x )e mt, t t X t = m m (x )(m )/m e t, t t with t = m log (x )(m ). Figure shows the trajectories of the solution of (26) simulated in the variance gamma model. The variance gamma model is a purejump Lévy process with Lévy density ν(x) = Ce λ x x x< + Ce λ+x x>. x The variance gamma process is thus a difference of two independent gamma processes and we simulate it using the approximation of Example 7. The nearexact solution was produced using the standard Euler scheme with discretization steps. With jumps, the jumpadapted scheme has a greater error than the Euler scheme with points, because the Euler scheme uses exact simulation of increments. However for 2 jumps, the error of the jumpadapted scheme virtually disappears, whereas the Euler scheme still has a significant error even with 5 steps. This illustrates the exponential convergence of the jumpadapted scheme for the variance gamma process. Note that these graphs show the trajectories of the solution and hence illustrate the strong convergence. The effect of the weak approximation of small jumps by Brownian motion is therefore not visible, but even without this additional improvement, the convergence for the variance gamma process is very fast. Multidimensional SDE: Libor market model with jumps One important example of a nontrivial multidimensional SDE arises in the Libor market model, which describes joint arbitragefree dynamics of a set of forward interest rates. Libor market models with jumps were considered among others by Jamshidian, Glasserman and Kou 9 and Eberlein and Özkan 7. Let T i = T +(i )δ, i =,...,n+ be a set of dates called tenor dates. The Libor rate L i t is the forward interest rate, defined at date t for the period T i, T i+. If 9
20 Jump adapted with jumps Jump adapted with 2 jumps Near exact solution Euler with points Euler with 5 points Near exact solution Figure : CPPI portfolio simulation with V =.5 and m = 2 in the variance gamma model (no diffusion component added). Left: jumpadapted scheme. ight: standard Euler scheme. B t (T) is the price at time t of a zerocoupon bond, that is, a bond which pays to its holder unit at date T, the Libor rates can be computed via L i t = ( ) Bt (T i ) δ B t (T i+ ) A Libor market model (LMM) is a model describing an arbitragefree dynamics of a set of Libor rates. In this example, we shall use a simplified version of the general semimartingale LMM given in, supposing that all Libor rates are driven by a d dimensional pure jump Lévy process. In this case, following, an arbitragefree dynamics of L t,...,l n t can be constructed via the multidimensional SDE dl i t L i t = σ i (t)dz t σ i (t)z d n j=i+ ( + δlj t σj (t)z + δl j t ) ν(dz)dt. (27) Here Z is a ddimensional martingale pure jump Lévy process with Lévy measure ν, and σ i (t) are ddimensional deterministic volatility functions. Equation (27) gives the Libor dynamics under the socalled terminal measure, which corresponds to using the last zerocoupon bond B t (T n+ ) as numéraire. This means that the price at time t of an option having payoff H = h(l T,...,L n T ) 2
21 at time T is given by h(l π t (H) = B t (T n+ )E T,..., L n T ) B T (T n+ ) F t n = B t (T n+ )E h(l T,..., L n T ) ( + δl i T ) F t = i= B t (T ) n i= ( + δli t) E h(l T,..., L n T ) n ( + δl i T ) F t i= (28) The price of any such option can therefore be computed by Monte Carlo using equation (27). Introducing a n + dimensional state process X t with Xt t and Xi t = Li t for i n, a d + dimensional driving Lévy process Z t = (t Z t ), and a (n + ) (d + )dimensional function h(x) defined by h =, h j = for j = 2,...,d +, h i = f i (x) and h ij = σj i (x ) with f i (x) := σ i (x )z d n j=i+ ( + δx jσ j ) (x )z + δx j ν(dz), we see that the equation (27) takes the homogeneous form dx t = h(x t )d Z t, to which the discretization scheme of section 3 can be readily applied. For the purposes of illustration, we simplify the model even further, taking d = and supposing that the functions σ i (t) are constant: σ i (t). The driving Lévy process Z is supposed to follow the CGMY model with two alternative sets of parameters: α =.5 and C =.5 in Case and α =.8 and C =. in Case 2. In both cases, we take λ + = and λ = 2. The set of tenor dates for the Libor market model is {5, 6, 7, 8, 9, } years, which corresponds to a stochastic differential equation in dimension 5. The initial values of all forward Libor rates are all equal to 5%. This big a value was taken to emphasize the nonlinear effects in the simulation. For the numerical implementation of the scheme of section 3, we solved the equations (7) and (8) simultaneously using the classical 4th order unge Kutta scheme, with time step equal to max(, Ti+ T i ). This means that most of the time there is only one step of the ungekutta scheme between two consecutive jump times, and our numerical tests have shown that even in this case the error associated to the ungekutta scheme is negligible compared to the stochastic approximation error. As a sanity check, we first compute the price of a zerocoupon bond with maturity T, which corresponds to taking h in equation (28). By construction of the model, if the SDE is solved correctly, we must recover the input price of the zerocoupon bond. Figure 2 shows the ratio of the zero coupon bond price estimated using the firstorder scheme of section 3 to the input value. For comparison, we also give the value computed using the order approximation 2
Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations
Monte Carlo Simulation: IEOR E473 Fall 24 c 24 by Martin Haugh Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations 1 Brief Review of Stochastic Calculus and Itô s Lemma Let S t be the time t price of a particular
More informationSensitivity analysis of European options in jumpdiffusion models via the Malliavin calculus on the Wiener space
Sensitivity analysis of European options in jumpdiffusion models via the Malliavin calculus on the Wiener space Virginie Debelley and Nicolas Privault Département de Mathématiques Université de La Rochelle
More informationARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS. Denis Bell. University of North Florida
ARBITRAGEFREE OPTION PRICING MODELS Denis Bell University of North Florida Modelling Stock Prices Example American Express In mathematical finance, it is customary to model a stock price by an (Ito) stochatic
More informationJungSoon Hyun and YoungHee Kim
J. Korean Math. Soc. 43 (2006), No. 4, pp. 845 858 TWO APPROACHES FOR STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATE OPTION MODEL JungSoon Hyun and YoungHee Kim Abstract. We present two approaches of the stochastic interest
More informationLecture 10. Finite difference and finite element methods. Option pricing Sensitivity analysis Numerical examples
Finite difference and finite element methods Lecture 10 Sensitivities and Greeks Key task in financial engineering: fast and accurate calculation of sensitivities of market models with respect to model
More informationMonte Carlo Methods in Finance
Author: Yiyang Yang Advisor: Pr. Xiaolin Li, Pr. Zari Rachev Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics State University of New York at Stony Brook October 2, 2012 Outline Introduction 1 Introduction
More informationThe BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options
he BlackScholesMerton Approach to Pricing Options Paul J Atzberger Comments should be sent to: atzberg@mathucsbedu Introduction In this article we shall discuss the BlackScholesMerton approach to determining
More informationMaster of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions
Master of Mathematical Finance: Course Descriptions CS 522 Data Mining Computer Science This course provides continued exploration of data mining algorithms. More sophisticated algorithms such as support
More informationMaximum likelihood estimation of mean reverting processes
Maximum likelihood estimation of mean reverting processes José Carlos García Franco Onward, Inc. jcpollo@onwardinc.com Abstract Mean reverting processes are frequently used models in real options. For
More informationA spot price model feasible for electricity forward pricing Part II
A spot price model feasible for electricity forward pricing Part II Fred Espen Benth Centre of Mathematics for Applications (CMA) University of Oslo, Norway Wolfgang Pauli Institute, Wien January 1718
More informationStephane Crepey. Financial Modeling. A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective. 4y Springer
Stephane Crepey Financial Modeling A Backward Stochastic Differential Equations Perspective 4y Springer Part I An Introductory Course in Stochastic Processes 1 Some Classes of DiscreteTime Stochastic
More informationIntroduction to portfolio insurance. Introduction to portfolio insurance p.1/41
Introduction to portfolio insurance Introduction to portfolio insurance p.1/41 Portfolio insurance Maintain the portfolio value above a certain predetermined level (floor) while allowing some upside potential.
More informationOn exponentially ane martingales. Johannes MuhleKarbe
On exponentially ane martingales AMAMEF 2007, Bedlewo Johannes MuhleKarbe Joint work with Jan Kallsen HVBInstitut für Finanzmathematik, Technische Universität München 1 Outline 1. Semimartingale characteristics
More informationMarkovian projection for volatility calibration
cutting edge. calibration Markovian projection for volatility calibration Vladimir Piterbarg looks at the Markovian projection method, a way of obtaining closedform approximations of Europeanstyle option
More informationThe Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models
780 w Interest Rate Models The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates Before discussing how a bond marketmaker would deltahedge, we first need to specify how bonds behave. Suppose we try to model a zerocoupon
More informationCOMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS
COMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS NICOLE BÄUERLE AND STEFANIE GRETHER Abstract. In this short note we prove a conjecture posed in Cui et al. 2012): Dynamic meanvariance problems in
More informationEXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL
EXIT TIME PROBLEMS AND ESCAPE FROM A POTENTIAL WELL Exit Time problems and Escape from a Potential Well Escape From a Potential Well There are many systems in physics, chemistry and biology that exist
More informationECG590I Asset Pricing. Lecture 2: Present Value 1
ECG59I Asset Pricing. Lecture 2: Present Value 1 2 Present Value If you have to decide between receiving 1$ now or 1$ one year from now, then you would rather have your money now. If you have to decide
More informationThe BlackScholes Formula
FIN40008 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008 The BlackScholes Formula These notes examine the BlackScholes formula for European options. The BlackScholes formula are complex as they are based on the
More informationIntroduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems
Introduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems Dmitry Kramkov Carnegie Mellon University Workshop on Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Penn State, May 810, 2015 1 / 24 Outline Financial market
More informationGuaranteed Annuity Options
Guaranteed Annuity Options Hansjörg Furrer Marketconsistent Actuarial Valuation ETH Zürich, Frühjahrssemester 2008 Guaranteed Annuity Options Contents A. Guaranteed Annuity Options B. Valuation and Risk
More informationProbability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
Probability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Module No. #01 Lecture No. #15 Special DistributionsVI Today, I am going to introduce
More informationA new FeynmanKacformula for option pricing in Lévy models
A new FeynmanKacformula for option pricing in Lévy models Kathrin Glau Department of Mathematical Stochastics, Universtity of Freiburg (Joint work with E. Eberlein) 6th World Congress of the Bachelier
More informationAsian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market
Sun and Chen Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications (215) 3:11 DOI 1.1186/s446715357 RESEARCH Open Access Asian Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market Jiajun Sun 1 and Xiaowei
More informationMonte Carlo Methods and Models in Finance and Insurance
Chapman & Hall/CRC FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS SERIES Monte Carlo Methods and Models in Finance and Insurance Ralf Korn Elke Korn Gerald Kroisandt f r oc) CRC Press \ V^ J Taylor & Francis Croup ^^"^ Boca Raton
More informationNumerical methods for American options
Lecture 9 Numerical methods for American options Lecture Notes by Andrzej Palczewski Computational Finance p. 1 American options The holder of an American option has the right to exercise it at any moment
More informationPricing of an Exotic Forward Contract
Pricing of an Exotic Forward Contract Jirô Akahori, Yuji Hishida and Maho Nishida Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University 111 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 5258577, Japan Email: {akahori,
More informationSome Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory
Journal of Uncertain Systems Vol.3, No.1, pp.310, 2009 Online at: www.jus.org.uk Some Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory aoding Liu Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences
More informationThe Heat Equation. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/88
The Heat Equation Lectures INF232 p. 1/88 Lectures INF232 p. 2/88 The Heat Equation We study the heat equation: u t = u xx for x (,1), t >, (1) u(,t) = u(1,t) = for t >, (2) u(x,) = f(x) for x (,1), (3)
More informationContents. 5 Numerical results 27 5.1 Single policies... 27 5.2 Portfolio of policies... 29
Abstract The capital requirements for insurance companies in the Solvency I framework are based on the premium and claim expenditure. This approach does not take the individual risk of the insurer into
More informationA Novel Fourier Transform Bspline Method for Option Pricing*
A Novel Fourier Transform Bspline Method for Option Pricing* Paper available from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2269370 Gareth G. Haslip, FIA PhD Cass Business School, City University London October
More informationDecomposition of life insurance liabilities into risk factors theory and application
Decomposition of life insurance liabilities into risk factors theory and application Katja Schilling University of Ulm March 7, 2014 Joint work with Daniel Bauer, Marcus C. Christiansen, Alexander Kling
More informationStochastic Modelling and Forecasting
Stochastic Modelling and Forecasting Department of Statistics and Modelling Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow, G1 1XH RSE/NNSFC Workshop on Management Science and Engineering and Public Policy
More informationQUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS
QUANTIZED INTEREST RATE AT THE MONEY FOR AMERICAN OPTIONS L. M. Dieng ( Department of Physics, CUNY/BCC, New York, New York) Abstract: In this work, we expand the idea of Samuelson[3] and Shepp[,5,6] for
More informationNonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion
Nonparametric adaptive age replacement with a onecycle criterion P. CoolenSchrijner, F.P.A. Coolen Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK email: Pauline.Schrijner@durham.ac.uk
More informationDoes BlackScholes framework for Option Pricing use Constant Volatilities and Interest Rates? New Solution for a New Problem
Does BlackScholes framework for Option Pricing use Constant Volatilities and Interest Rates? New Solution for a New Problem Gagan Deep Singh Assistant Vice President Genpact Smart Decision Services Financial
More informationRolf Poulsen, Centre for Finance, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE40530 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: rolf.poulsen@economics.gu.se.
The Margrabe Formula Rolf Poulsen, Centre for Finance, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE40530 Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: rolf.poulsen@economics.gu.se Abstract The Margrabe formula for valuation of
More informationScientific Computing: An Introductory Survey
Scientific Computing: An Introductory Survey Chapter 10 Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations Prof. Michael T. Heath Department of Computer Science University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign
More informationMathematical Finance
Mathematical Finance Option Pricing under the RiskNeutral Measure Cory Barnes Department of Mathematics University of Washington June 11, 2013 Outline 1 Probability Background 2 Black Scholes for European
More informationAsymptotics of discounted aggregate claims for renewal risk model with risky investment
Appl. Math. J. Chinese Univ. 21, 25(2: 29216 Asymptotics of discounted aggregate claims for renewal risk model with risky investment JIANG Tao Abstract. Under the assumption that the claim size is subexponentially
More informationHedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies
Hedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies Drazen Pesjak Supervised by A.A. Tsvetkov 1, D. Posthuma 2 and S.A. Borovkova 3 MSc. Thesis Finance HONOURS TRACK Quantitative
More informationThe Effective Dimension of AssetLiability Management Problems in Life Insurance
The Effective Dimension of AssetLiability Management Problems in Life Insurance Thomas Gerstner, Michael Griebel, Markus Holtz Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn holtz@ins.unibonn.de
More informationEstimating the Degree of Activity of jumps in High Frequency Financial Data. joint with Yacine AïtSahalia
Estimating the Degree of Activity of jumps in High Frequency Financial Data joint with Yacine AïtSahalia Aim and setting An underlying process X = (X t ) t 0, observed at equally spaced discrete times
More informationDiscussion on the paper Hypotheses testing by convex optimization by A. Goldenschluger, A. Juditsky and A. Nemirovski.
Discussion on the paper Hypotheses testing by convex optimization by A. Goldenschluger, A. Juditsky and A. Nemirovski. Fabienne Comte, Celine Duval, Valentine GenonCatalot To cite this version: Fabienne
More informationIntroduction to General and Generalized Linear Models
Introduction to General and Generalized Linear Models General Linear Models  part I Henrik Madsen Poul Thyregod Informatics and Mathematical Modelling Technical University of Denmark DK2800 Kgs. Lyngby
More informationFinancial Modeling. An introduction to financial modelling and financial options. Conall O Sullivan
Financial Modeling An introduction to financial modelling and financial options Conall O Sullivan Banking and Finance UCD Smurfit School of Business 31 May / UCD Maths Summer School Outline Introduction
More informationStochastic volatility: option pricing using a multinomial recombining tree
Stochastic volatility: option pricing using a multinomial recombining tree Ionuţ Florescu 1,3 and Frederi G. Viens,4 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point
More informationEuropean Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation
European Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation Alexandros Kyrtsos Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Boston University akyrtsos@bu.edu European options can be priced using the analytical
More informationLecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing
Lecture Note of Bus 41202, Spring 2012: Stochastic Diffusion & Option Pricing Key concept: Ito s lemma Stock Options: A contract giving its holder the right, but not obligation, to trade shares of a common
More informationChapter 2: Binomial Methods and the BlackScholes Formula
Chapter 2: Binomial Methods and the BlackScholes Formula 2.1 Binomial Trees We consider a financial market consisting of a bond B t = B(t), a stock S t = S(t), and a calloption C t = C(t), where the
More informationExample of High Dimensional Contract
Example of High Dimensional Contract An exotic high dimensional option is the INGCoconote option (Conditional Coupon Note), whose lifetime is 8 years (24212). The interest rate paid is flexible. In the
More information1 Simulating Brownian motion (BM) and geometric Brownian motion (GBM)
Copyright c 2013 by Karl Sigman 1 Simulating Brownian motion (BM) and geometric Brownian motion (GBM) For an introduction to how one can construct BM, see the Appendix at the end of these notes A stochastic
More informationThe Exponential Distribution
21 The Exponential Distribution From DiscreteTime to ContinuousTime: In Chapter 6 of the text we will be considering Markov processes in continuous time. In a sense, we already have a very good understanding
More informationStochastic Gradient Method: Applications
Stochastic Gradient Method: Applications February 03, 2015 P. Carpentier Master MMMEF Cours MNOS 20142015 114 / 267 Lecture Outline 1 Two Elementary Exercices on the Stochastic Gradient TwoStage Recourse
More informationOPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS
ONDERZOEKSRAPPORT NR 8904 OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl IN A NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS BY M. VANDEBROEK & J. DHAENE D/1989/2376/5 1 IN A OPTIMAl PREMIUM CONTROl NONliFE INSURANCE BUSINESS By Martina Vandebroek
More informationHPCFinance: New Thinking in Finance. Calculating Variable Annuity Liability Greeks Using Monte Carlo Simulation
HPCFinance: New Thinking in Finance Calculating Variable Annuity Liability Greeks Using Monte Carlo Simulation Dr. Mark Cathcart, Standard Life February 14, 2014 0 / 58 Outline Outline of Presentation
More informationDirichlet forms methods for error calculus and sensitivity analysis
Dirichlet forms methods for error calculus and sensitivity analysis Nicolas BOULEAU, Osaka university, november 2004 These lectures propose tools for studying sensitivity of models to scalar or functional
More information5 Numerical Differentiation
D. Levy 5 Numerical Differentiation 5. Basic Concepts This chapter deals with numerical approximations of derivatives. The first questions that comes up to mind is: why do we need to approximate derivatives
More informationOption Pricing. Chapter 4 Including dividends in the BS model. Stefan Ankirchner. University of Bonn. last update: 6th November 2013
Option Pricing Chapter 4 Including dividends in the BS model Stefan Ankirchner University of Bonn last update: 6th November 2013 Stefan Ankirchner Option Pricing 1 Dividend payments So far: we assumed
More informationDisability insurance: estimation and risk aggregation
Disability insurance: estimation and risk aggregation B. Löfdahl Department of Mathematics KTH, Royal Institute of Technology May 2015 Introduction New upcoming regulation for insurance industry: Solvency
More informationSums of Independent Random Variables
Chapter 7 Sums of Independent Random Variables 7.1 Sums of Discrete Random Variables In this chapter we turn to the important question of determining the distribution of a sum of independent random variables
More informationFAST SIMULATION FOR COMPUTING CREDIT VALUE ADJUSTMENTS OF INTEREST RATE PORTFOLIOS
FAST SIMULATION FOR COMPUTING CREDIT VALUE ADJUSTMENTS OF INTEREST RATE PORTFOLIOS Team members Jonatan Eriksson (Swedbank) Jonas Hallgren (KTH) Ola Hammarlid (Swedbank) Henrik Hult (KTH, team leader)
More informationMoreover, under the risk neutral measure, it must be the case that (5) r t = µ t.
LECTURE 7: BLACK SCHOLES THEORY 1. Introduction: The Black Scholes Model In 1973 Fisher Black and Myron Scholes ushered in the modern era of derivative securities with a seminal paper 1 on the pricing
More informationLecture Notes to Accompany. Scientific Computing An Introductory Survey. by Michael T. Heath. Chapter 10
Lecture Notes to Accompany Scientific Computing An Introductory Survey Second Edition by Michael T. Heath Chapter 10 Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations Copyright c 2001. Reproduction
More informationHedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility. Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15
Hedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15 1. Motivation This is a pure jump model and hence avoids the theoretical drawbacks of continuous path models.
More informationLECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART II TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART II TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Robert S. Pindyck Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02142 Robert Pindyck (MIT) LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS PART II August, 2008 1 / 50
More informationExplicit Option Pricing Formula for a MeanReverting Asset in Energy Markets
Explicit Option Pricing Formula for a MeanReverting Asset in Energy Markets Anatoliy Swishchuk Mathematical & Computational Finance Lab Dept of Math & Stat, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
More informationPricing Forwards and Swaps
Chapter 7 Pricing Forwards and Swaps 7. Forwards Throughout this chapter, we will repeatedly use the following property of noarbitrage: P 0 (αx T +βy T ) = αp 0 (x T )+βp 0 (y T ). Here, P 0 (w T ) is
More informationPricing Barrier Options under Local Volatility
Abstract Pricing Barrier Options under Local Volatility Artur Sepp Mail: artursepp@hotmail.com, Web: www.hot.ee/seppar 16 November 2002 We study pricing under the local volatility. Our research is mainly
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More information1 The Brownian bridge construction
The Brownian bridge construction The Brownian bridge construction is a way to build a Brownian motion path by successively adding finer scale detail. This construction leads to a relatively easy proof
More informationOverview of Monte Carlo Simulation, Probability Review and Introduction to Matlab
Monte Carlo Simulation: IEOR E4703 Fall 2004 c 2004 by Martin Haugh Overview of Monte Carlo Simulation, Probability Review and Introduction to Matlab 1 Overview of Monte Carlo Simulation 1.1 Why use simulation?
More informationPricing and calibration in local volatility models via fast quantization
Pricing and calibration in local volatility models via fast quantization Parma, 29 th January 2015. Joint work with Giorgia Callegaro and Martino Grasselli Quantization: a brief history Birth: back to
More informationValuation of the Surrender Option in Life Insurance Policies
Valuation of the Surrender Option in Life Insurance Policies Hansjörg Furrer Marketconsistent Actuarial Valuation ETH Zürich, Frühjahrssemester 2010 Valuing Surrender Options Contents A. Motivation and
More informationSome ergodic theorems of linear systems of interacting diffusions
Some ergodic theorems of linear systems of interacting diffusions 4], Â_ ŒÆ êæ ÆÆ Nov, 2009, uà ŒÆ liuyong@math.pku.edu.cn yangfx@math.pku.edu.cn 1 1 30 1 The ergodic theory of interacting systems has
More informationVilnius University. Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics. Gintautas Bareikis
Vilnius University Faculty of Mathematics and Informatics Gintautas Bareikis CONTENT Chapter 1. SIMPLE AND COMPOUND INTEREST 1.1 Simple interest......................................................................
More informationPricing complex options using a simple Monte Carlo Simulation
A subsidiary of Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Pricing complex options using a simple Monte Carlo Simulation Peter Fink Among the different numerical procedures for valuing options, the Monte Carlo
More informationTwo Topics in Parametric Integration Applied to Stochastic Simulation in Industrial Engineering
Two Topics in Parametric Integration Applied to Stochastic Simulation in Industrial Engineering Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences Northwestern University September 15th, 2014
More informationProbability and Statistics
CHAPTER 2: RANDOM VARIABLES AND ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS 2b  0 Probability and Statistics Kristel Van Steen, PhD 2 Montefiore Institute  Systems and Modeling GIGA  Bioinformatics ULg kristel.vansteen@ulg.ac.be
More informationA Genetic Algorithm to Price an European Put Option Using the Geometric Mean Reverting Model
Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol 8, 14, no 143, 7157135 HIKARI Ltd, wwwmhikaricom http://dxdoiorg/11988/ams144644 A Genetic Algorithm to Price an European Put Option Using the Geometric Mean Reverting
More informationThe BlackScholes pricing formulas
The BlackScholes pricing formulas Moty Katzman September 19, 2014 The BlackScholes differential equation Aim: Find a formula for the price of European options on stock. Lemma 6.1: Assume that a stock
More informationOn BlackScholes Equation, Black Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price
On BlackScholes Equation, Black Scholes Formula and Binary Option Price Abstract: Chi Gao 12/15/2013 I. BlackScholes Equation is derived using two methods: (1) riskneutral measure; (2)  hedge. II.
More informationProbability and Statistics
Probability and Statistics Syllabus for the TEMPUS SEE PhD Course (Podgorica, April 4 29, 2011) Franz Kappel 1 Institute for Mathematics and Scientific Computing University of Graz Žaneta Popeska 2 Faculty
More informationHOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS. n!f n (1) lim. ln x n! + xn x. 1 = G n 1 (x). (2) k + 1 n. (n 1)!
Math 7 Fall 205 HOMEWORK 5 SOLUTIONS Problem. 2008 B2 Let F 0 x = ln x. For n 0 and x > 0, let F n+ x = 0 F ntdt. Evaluate n!f n lim n ln n. By directly computing F n x for small n s, we obtain the following
More informationLectures 56: Taylor Series
Math 1d Instructor: Padraic Bartlett Lectures 5: Taylor Series Weeks 5 Caltech 213 1 Taylor Polynomials and Series As we saw in week 4, power series are remarkably nice objects to work with. In particular,
More information7: The CRR Market Model
Ben Goldys and Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney MATH3075/3975 Financial Mathematics Semester 2, 2015 Outline We will examine the following issues: 1 The CoxRossRubinstein
More informationReview of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology
Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology March 24, 2005 1 Introduction The purchase of an options contract gives the buyer the right to buy call options contract or sell put options contract some
More informationA nongaussian OrnsteinUhlenbeck process for electricity spot price modeling and derivatives pricing
A nongaussian OrnsteinUhlenbeck process for electricity spot price modeling and derivatives pricing Thilo MeyerBrandis Center of Mathematics for Applications / University of Oslo Based on joint work
More informationCONTROLLABILITY. Chapter 2. 2.1 Reachable Set and Controllability. Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation
Chapter 2 CONTROLLABILITY 2 Reachable Set and Controllability Suppose we have a linear system described by the state equation ẋ Ax + Bu (2) x() x Consider the following problem For a given vector x in
More informationAlternative Price Processes for BlackScholes: Empirical Evidence and Theory
Alternative Price Processes for BlackScholes: Empirical Evidence and Theory Samuel W. Malone April 19, 2002 This work is supported by NSF VIGRE grant number DMS9983320. Page 1 of 44 1 Introduction This
More informationSome stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model
Some stability results of parameter identification in a jump diffusion model D. Düvelmeyer Technische Universität Chemnitz, Fakultät für Mathematik, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany Abstract In this paper we discuss
More informationEXISTENCE AND NONEXISTENCE RESULTS FOR A NONLINEAR HEAT EQUATION
Sixth Mississippi State Conference on Differential Equations and Computational Simulations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 5 (7), pp. 5 65. ISSN: 7669. UL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu
More informationGrey Brownian motion and local times
Grey Brownian motion and local times José Luís da Silva 1,2 (Joint work with: M. Erraoui 3 ) 2 CCM  Centro de Ciências Matemáticas, University of Madeira, Portugal 3 University Cadi Ayyad, Faculty of
More informationFour Derivations of the Black Scholes PDE by Fabrice Douglas Rouah www.frouah.com www.volopta.com
Four Derivations of the Black Scholes PDE by Fabrice Douglas Rouah www.frouah.com www.volopta.com In this Note we derive the Black Scholes PDE for an option V, given by @t + 1 + rs @S2 @S We derive the
More informationApplications to Data Smoothing and Image Processing I
Applications to Data Smoothing and Image Processing I MA 348 Kurt Bryan Signals and Images Let t denote time and consider a signal a(t) on some time interval, say t. We ll assume that the signal a(t) is
More informationFrom Binomial Trees to the BlackScholes Option Pricing Formulas
Lecture 4 From Binomial Trees to the BlackScholes Option Pricing Formulas In this lecture, we will extend the example in Lecture 2 to a general setting of binomial trees, as an important model for a single
More informationBinomial lattice model for stock prices
Copyright c 2007 by Karl Sigman Binomial lattice model for stock prices Here we model the price of a stock in discrete time by a Markov chain of the recursive form S n+ S n Y n+, n 0, where the {Y i }
More informationIntroduction to MonteCarlo Methods
Introduction to MonteCarlo Methods Bernard Lapeyre Halmstad January 2007 MonteCarlo methods are extensively used in financial institutions to compute European options prices to evaluate sensitivities
More informationTHE BLACKSCHOLES MODEL AND EXTENSIONS
THE BLACSCHOLES MODEL AND EXTENSIONS EVAN TURNER Abstract. This paper will derive the BlackScholes pricing model of a European option by calculating the expected value of the option. We will assume that
More informationLecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. LogNormal Distribution
Lecture 8: Random Walk vs. Brownian Motion, Binomial Model vs. Logormal Distribution October 4, 200 Limiting Distribution of the Scaled Random Walk Recall that we defined a scaled simple random walk last
More information