Regulatory Predictions for BPL

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Regulatory Predictions for BPL"

Transcription

1 WIRELESS DEVELOPMENT March 2005 Keller and Heckman LLP Serving Business through Law and Science Regulatory Predictions for BPL Broadband over Power Line ( BPL ) technology is justifiably receiving a great deal of attention at the Federal Communications Commission and elsewhere, because of its potential as a last mile transmission technology. This White Paper highlights the principal regulatory considerations associated with services that may be provided to residential and business customers over BPL networks. More particularly, the focus of this paper is the extent to which BPL services will be regulated as compared to: high speed Internet access services of cable operators, incumbent local exchange carriers ( ILECs ), and Wireless Internet Services Providers ( WISPs ), and Digital Subscriber Line ( DSL ) services provided by ILECs. 1 These services are the models or templates that most closely correspond to the services that can be delivered over BPL networks today. In the future, BPL versions of high capacity special access services such as DS-1 or DS-3 services may be deliverable over BPL networks, as well. The extent of regulation applicable to services provisioned over BPL networks is largely a function of three factors: (1) the services being provided, (2) jurisdiction, and (3) the nature of the services provider. As discussed below, we believe that utilities delivering services over BPL networks will be regulated in a light-handed and predictable manner Telecommunications Services, Private Carrier Services or Information Services May Be Offered Over BPL Networks The statutory definitions of telecommunications services, telecommunications, and information services are central to determining how any service is categorized for regulatory purposes. These definitions are set out in Table 1. Like other services providers, utilities may offer telecommunications services, private carrier services or information services over their BPL networks. Facilities-based, high speed Internet access service in which the provider combines high speed telecommunications, such as that available through DSL technology, with the Internet Protocol ( IP ) suite is generally regarded as the principal BPL commercial service. The service delivered to the enduser is often referred to as broadband service or simply broadband. The high speed Internet access service provided by cable operators over their cable modem networks is an example of facilities-based broadband service. For regulatory purposes, the service is generally regarded as an information service, though there is controversy on this point, as discussed in Section 3, below. Examples of other information services include Internet access service offered by Internet Services Providers ( ISPs ), such as AOL and EarthLink, web portals such as that operated by Yahoo, and search engines such as Google. Table 1 Key Definitions Telecommunications: the transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user s choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received. 47 U.S.C. 153(43). Telecommunications Service: the offering of telecommunications for a fee directly to the public, or such classes of users as to be effectively available directly to the public, regardless of the facilities used. 47 U.S.C. 153(46). Information Service: the offering of a capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing, retrieving, utilizing, or making available information via telecommunications, and includes electronic publishing, U.S.C. 153(20). Importantly, BPL technology also can support high speed telecommunications on a stand-alone basis. This capability is functionally similar to DSL services offered by the ILECs and the transmission-only service that cable operators occasionally sell to unaffiliated ISPs. For regulatory purposes, these offerings may either be private carrier services or telecommunications services. Examples of other telecommunications services are circuit-switched voice (local and long distance), frame relay and private line services.

2 2 The distinctions between telecommunications services, private carrier services, and information services are noteworthy because of the regulatory obligations imposed on telecommunications carriers (providers of telecommunications services) as opposed to non-telecommunications carriers. Interstate telecommunications carriers are subject to Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ( Communications Act ), and must provide service upon reasonable request, pursuant to non-discriminatory rates, terms and conditions. Interstate telecommunications carriers are subject to universal service fund ( USF ) obligations, the Communications Assistance and Law Enforcement Act ( CALEA ), and entry and exit regulation under Section 214 of the Communications Act. Intrastate telecommunications carriers include providers of local exchange service, such as the ILECs and competitive local exchange carriers ( CLECs ), and providers of intrastate long distance services, such as MCI, AT&T and many resellers. They may be subject to state commission regulation, or both FCC and state regulation, depending on the nature of the services they offer. As noted above, utilities offering BPL may elect to provide telecommunications to customers, such as ISPs, on a private carrier basis. The long recognized characteristic distinguishing telecommunications carriers and private carriers is that private carriers do not hold themselves out indiscriminately to the public to provide service upon reasonable request as do telecommunications carriers. Rather, the private carrier chooses its clients on an individual basis and determines in each particular case whether and on what terms to serve and there is no regulatory compulsion to serve all indifferently. 3 This distinction is critical for regulatory purposes. A private carrier is not subject to exit and entry regulation under Section 214 of the Communications Act and is not obligated to provide service pursuant to nondiscriminatory and just and reasonable rates, terms and conditions. In other words, the private carrier can choose its customers and partners and set terms and conditions of service at its discretion. As compared to telecommunications carriers, information services providers are largely unregulated. Information services providers are not subject to exit or entry regulation, and the rates, terms and conditions for their services are not regulated by either state commissions or the FCC Virtually All Commercial BPL Services Will Be Interstate Services, Subject to Exclusive FCC Jurisdiction The services that may be deployed over BPL networks likely will be subject to exclusive FCC as opposed to state or joint state and FCC regulation. The controlling principles for determining the jurisdiction of telecommunications services may be summarized as follows: 1. Jurisdiction is based on the end points of customer s voice or data communications, i.e., the points of origination and termination. Jurisdiction is not based on the physical location of the facilities of any services provider involved in providing the service the originating access facilities, the interexchange or long haul facilities, or the terminating access facilities. 2. Dedicated, non-circuit switched services such as frame relay, private line, special access, and DSL telecommunications services are subject to exclusive FCC jurisdiction if more than a de minimis level of traffic originates and terminates in different states. 3. The de minimis threshold is considered to be reached if 10% or more of the traffic is interstate. Under these principles, many telecommunications services are almost always subject to exclusive FCC jurisdiction. These jurisdictional principles apply equally to telecommunications offered on a private carrier basis. Generally speaking, state regulation would apply to BPL services in the unlikely event a BPL provider elected to provide only circuit-switched local exchange or intrastate interexchange voice services over its BPL network. 5 The FCC has applied the same analysis to high speed Internet access, and has concluded that because Internet access service has the capability to connect users to servers and other Internet accessible devices throughout the world, high speed Internet access is an interstate information service subject to the FCC s exclusive jurisdiction Different Services Providers Are Subject to Different Regulatory Obligations Telecommunications Carriers. Among interstate telecommunications carriers, the FCC distinguishes between non-dominant carriers and dominant carriers. Only the ILECs, including the Regional Bell Operating Companies ( RBOCs ), are regulated as dominant carriers, but only with respect to DSL service, special access services DS-1, DS-3 and Ethernet access services, and interstate switched access services. The FCC requires tariffs and imposes substantive rate regulation on these types of carriers for these services and imposes business structure requirements on these carriers. All other carriers, including AT&T, MCI and competitive local exchange carriers ( CLECs ) are regulated as nondominant carriers. Non-dominant carriers are deemed to lack market power, i.e., the ability to set or maintain prices or

3 3 price levels. Thus, non-dominant carriers are not subject to substantive rate regulation or business structure (separate subsidiary) requirements. 7 Non-dominant carriers, by and large, no longer file tariffs. Utilities offering telecommunications services over BPLbased systems almost always will be regulated as interstate, non-dominant telecommunications carriers. Private Carriers. Utilities providing telecommunications over BPL networks on a private carrier basis are not subject to telecommunications carrier regulation with the exception of the obligation to contribute to USF. Information Services Providers. Regulatory uncertainty exists today for cable operators providing broadband service over their cable modem platforms. The issue is whether unaffiliated ISPs are entitled to access the cable modem platform to transport their own Internet access service. This uncertainty should benefit utilities, because ISPs blocked from cable access may well seek to partner with utilities to provide last mile high speed transport for their Internet access service via BPL platforms. On the other hand, the FCC informally maintains that emerging facilities-based information services providers, such as WISPs, are not required to provide unaffiliated ISPs with access to their wireless networks. 8 We believe that utilities delivering broadband services over BPL networks will be treated in the same manner as WISPs, because the legacy regulatory concerns associated with cable modem service simply do not apply to WISPs and BPL-based providers of information services. Unlike cable operators and ILECs, new facilities-based carriers do not have substantial revenue streams, billions of dollars, or fully deployed networks. In addition, the FCC has signaled repeatedly it does not want to extend so-called legacy regulation to new facilities-based providers of information services, although there may be some exceptions. In the near future, the FCC may impose CALEA obligations on some facilities-based information services providers. 9 Cable Modem Decision Regulatory uncertainty surrounding cable modem service stems from the insistence of local franchise authorities to require cable operators to allow unaffiliated ISPs access to the cable modem networks to offer competing high speed Internet access service. The cable operators have fought this open access obligation for years. not cable service, thereby preventing local cable franchising authorities from imposing open access obligations on cable operators. 10 But in its decision, the court held that cable modem service is part telecommunications service and part information service. Thus, similar to telecommunications carriers, cable operators would be obligated to provide a telecommunications service over their cable networks to ISPs upon reasonable request and pursuant to just and reasonable rates, terms and conditions. Looking to prevent this outcome, the FCC ruled in its Cable Modem Decision that cable modem service is a facilitiesbased, information service that utilizes telecommunications, but does not have a telecommunications service component. Thus, cable operators would not be subject to the telecommunications carrier obligations of Title II of the Communications Act under the FCC s interpretation, and cable operators could lawfully deny requests from unaffiliated ISPs for access to their cable modem platforms. The Wireline Broadband NPRM. 11 In an effort to place the RBOCs on equal footing with the cable operators and to spur competition among facilitiesbased Internet access providers, the FCC proposed to eliminate its longstanding Computer II policy adopted to ensure that the pre-divestiture AT&T and, subsequently, the RBOCs did not unfairly leverage their control over telecommunications services to dominate the market for information services. 12 In its Wireline Broadband NPRM, the agency tentatively concluded that information services provided over an ILEC s own transmission facilities are information services and do not have a telecommunications service component. 13 These facilities include the ILECs existing copper infrastructure, including DSL technology, and next generation fiber-tothe-home ( FTTH ) infrastructure. If this proposed policy change is adopted by the FCC, the RBOCs and other ILECs could elect to self-provision DSL service exclusively for their own high speed Internet access services. 14 Brand X 15 Unfortunately for the FCC and cable operators, the Cable Modem Decision was reversed and remanded in Brand X Internet Services v. FCC. The Ninth Circuit again held that cable modem service includes both telecommunications service and information service components. The decision has deferred indefinitely the Commission s resolution of the Wireline Broadband proceeding. The Ninth Circuit s decision is now before the Supreme Court, which is expected to rule on the matter later this year. In City of Portland v. FCC, the Ninth Circuit ruled that high speed Internet access provided over cable modem facilities is

4 4 4. Conclusions We believe the FCC s Cable Modem Decision ultimately will be affirmed by the courts. As this occurs, we believe the FCC will issue an order in its Wireline Broadband proceeding adopting its proposed policy change. On the chance that the Supreme Court affirms Brand X, the FCC has indicated informally that it would consider exercising its forbearance authority under 47 U.S.C. 160 so that cable operators and ILECs would not be obligated to offer the telecommunications component of their facilities-based information services as a stand-alone telecommunications service. We have every reason to believe that the FCC would adhere to these principles with regard to WISPs and utilities providing broadband service over BPL networks. While utilities need to evaluate BPL business prospects on a case-by-case basis, BPL technology presents a unique opportunity to participate in a truly dynamic segment of the domestic telecommunications and information services sector. Because the regulatory environment for new facilities-based information services providers is not burdensome and relatively predictable, utilities should feel encouraged to consider the potential of BPL technology and the merits of the business opportunity. The potentially substantial regulatory and business risks confronting many ISPs that do not have last mile infrastructure strongly suggest that utilities may have receptive partners looking to access their BPL networks. The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of Keller and Heckman LLP or its clients. This article is intended to provide a general overview of technical and regulatory issues related to BPL and should not be considered as legal advice applicable to any particular factual or legal question. Keller and Heckman LLP 1001 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C The regulatory considerations addressed in this paper are distinct from the rule amendments recently adopted by the FCC amending Part 15 of its Rules and Regulations to promote the deployment of BPL technology. See Report and Order, Amendment Of Part 15 Regarding New Requirements And Measurement Guidelines For Access Broadband Over Power Line Systems/Carrier Current Systems, Including Broadband Over Power Line Systems, 19 FCC Rcd (released October 28, 2004) (BPL Order), Reconsideration Pending. In general, the BPL Order set forth rules imposing new technical requirements on BPL devices, such as the capability to avoid using any specific frequency and to remotely adjust or shut down any unit. It also established excluded frequency bands and exclusion zones. The Commission also changed the equipment authorization for BPL systems from verification to certification. See also, White Paper, BPL And The FCC: The Current Regulatory Environment, Jack Richards (August 23, 2004); White Paper, Broadband Over Power Line: Pole Attachment, Antitrust And Access Issues, Jack Richards, Tom Magee (September 23, 2004); White Paper, Broadband Over Power Line: Easements, Rights-Of-Way and Related Issues, by Jack Richards and Tom Magee (October 14, 2004). All of these papers are available at the Keller and Heckman LLP website: 2 Utilities may be obligated to allocate the expenses and investments associated with BPL to so-called regulated and non-regulated accounts to ensure that electric ratepayers are not being burdened with costs, expenses and liabilities properly allocated to the business or subsidiary engaged in the provision of BPL services to residential and business customers. Cost allocation issues will be addressed by state commissions having jurisdiction over the regulated businesses of utilities, principally, retail electric distribution. 3 Inquiry Concerning High-Speed Access to the Internet over Cable and other Facilities, 17 FCC Rcd 4798, (2002) ( Cable Modem Decision ). 4 In several ongoing proceedings, the FCC is considering whether to impose USF contribution obligations on information services providers. 5 Congress expressly preempted state regulation over entry and rates of commercial mobile wireless services offered by wireless carriers such as Verizon Wireless and Sprint PCS. 47 U.S.C. 332 (c)(3). 6 Cable Modem Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at Utilities owned by holding companies subject to the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended, are required to provide telecommunications services, information services and private carrier services through a separate affiliate that has filed for and obtained Exempt Telecommunications Company ( ETC ) status from the FCC. 8 The FCC expressly excluded WISPs from the scope of its Cable Modem Decision. Cable Modem Decision, 17 FCC Rcd at 4800, n.5. 9 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act and Broadband Access and Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Declaratory Ruling, 19 FCC Rcd (2004). 10 AT&T v. City of Portland, 216 F. 3d 871 (9th Cir. 2000). 11 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet over Wireline Facilities, 17 FCC Rcd 3019 (rel. Feb. 15, 2002) (Wireline Broadband NPRM).

5 5 12 Today, ILECs provide DSL service as a stand-alone telecommunications service. Under the FCC s Computer II rules, ILECs are required to provide non-affiliated ISPs with non-discriminatory access to this service pursuant to just and reasonable rates, terms and conditions. 13 The Commission expressly excluded wireless Internet access service, non-ilec fiber networks and BPL-based Internet access service from the scope of the Wireless Broadband proceeding. Wireline Broadband NPRM, 17 FCC Rcd at 3020, n ISPs could still acquire DSL service from CLECs, such as Covad, that obtain local loops from the ILEC as unbundled network elements ( UNEs ) and offer the DSL services. ISPs are information services providers and are not eligible to acquire UNEs from ILECs. 15 Brand X Internet Services v. FCC, 345 F. 3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2003), cert. granted, Order list 543 U.S. (U.S. Dec. 3, 2004) (No ) (Brand X). Doug Jarrett is a Partner in the Washington, D.C. law firm of Keller and Heckman LLP (www. khlaw.com). Mr. Jarrett specializes in domestic and international telecommunications matters. He represents companies and associations before the Federal Communications Commission, focusing on Wireline Competition and Wireless matters with an emphasis on the deployment and regulation of broadband services. He regularly writes and speaks on varied telecommunications policy matters, including broadband deployment matters. Douglas Jarrett (202) Jack Richards (202) Jack Richards is a Partner in the Washington, D.C. law firm of Keller and Heckman LLP (www. khlaw.com). Since joining the firm in 1986, Mr. Richards has represented electric utilities, commercial wireless service providers, mobile radio and microwave operators and others before the Federal Communications Commission and in various telecommunications business ventures. His clients include the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative and the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association. Before joining Keller and Heckman LLP, Mr. Richards served for 10 years as an attorney with the FCC, where he held senior policy and management positions. Kevin Rupy is an Associate in the Washington, D.C. law firm of Keller and Heckman LLP (www. khlaw.com). Since joining the firm in 2000, Mr. Rupy has represented clients on regulatory and compliance matters before the Federal Communications Commission related to the wireless and satellite industries. Mr. Rupy s practice also includes the handling of diverse licensing issues such as assignments, transfers of control and compliance obligations. Kevin Rupy (202)

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) CenturyLink s Petition for Forbearance ) WC Docket No. 14-9 Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c) from ) Dominant Carrier

More information

MEMORANDUM THE FCC S 2015 OPEN INTERNET ORDER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE PROVIDERS SAMPLE

MEMORANDUM THE FCC S 2015 OPEN INTERNET ORDER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE PROVIDERS SAMPLE MEMORANDUM THE FCC S 2015 OPEN INTERNET ORDER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE PROVIDERS Introduction On March 12, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC or Commission

More information

COMMENTS OF O1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. & VAYA TELECOM, INC.

COMMENTS OF O1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. & VAYA TELECOM, INC. Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition for Declaratory Ruling That tw telecom inc. Has The Right To Direct IP-to-IP Interconnection Pursuant To Section

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION STATE OF MICHIGAN BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the matter, on the Commission s own motion, ) to consider Ameritech Michigan s compliance ) with the competitive checklist in Section

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL32985 CRS Report for Congress.Received through the CRS Web Defining Cable Broadband Internet Access Service: Background and Analysis of the Supreme Court s Brand X Decision July 7, 2005 Angie

More information

Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor

Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor Legal Alert: FCC Imposes Additional USF Contribution Obligations on Interconnected VoIP Providers, Increases Wireless Safe Harbor July 7, 2006 On June 27, 2006, the Federal Communications Commission (

More information

Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere?

Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere? Classifying Broadband Services as Telecommunications Services: A Tidal Wave of Change to USF Contribution Rules or a Slow Road to Somewhere? Orlando, FL Friday, May 15, 2015 10:15AM-11:00AM C. Douglas

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Technologies Transitions Policy Task Force GN Docket No. 13-5 COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN CABLE ASSOCIATION ON PUBLIC NOTICE

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 XO Communication Services, Inc. ) Request for Review of Decision of the ) WC Docket No. 06-122 Universal Service Administrator ) COMMENTS

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Verizon Communications Inc. ) ) WC Docket No. 15-44 and ) ) Frontier Communications Corporation ) ) Application

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review By InterCall, Inc. of Decision of Universal Service Administrator CC Docket No. 96-45 To: The Commission

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) VONAGE HOLDINGS ) CORPORATION ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) WC Docket No. 03-211 Concerning an Order of

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Wireline Competition Bureau Short Term Network Change Notification filed by Verizon New York Inc. Wireline Competition

More information

NEW UNBUNDLING RULES: WILL THE FCC FINALLY OPEN UP CABLE BROADBAND?

NEW UNBUNDLING RULES: WILL THE FCC FINALLY OPEN UP CABLE BROADBAND? NEW UNBUNDLING RULES: WILL THE FCC FINALLY OPEN UP CABLE BROADBAND? This ibrief discusses a recent Court of Appeals decision remanding FCC rules on the unbundling of Internet services by telephone exchange

More information

In the Matter of ) ) ) ) Consumer Information and Disclosure ) CG Docket No. 09-158. Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format ) CG Docket No.

In the Matter of ) ) ) ) Consumer Information and Disclosure ) CG Docket No. 09-158. Truth-in-Billing and Billing Format ) CG Docket No. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Empowering Consumers to Prevent and Detect Billing for Unauthorized Charges ( Cramming CG Docket No. 11-116 Consumer Information

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM 2004 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 AMENDMENT

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 AMENDMENT BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) SBC Communications Amendment to ) Ameritech s, Pacific Bell s, Nevada Bell s, and ) Southwestern Bell Telephone

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) VONAGE HOLDINGS ) CORPORATION ) WC Docket No. 03-211 Petition for Declaratory Ruling ) Concerning an Order of the )

More information

Regulatory Reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service is the Unsurprising Result of ISPs Inexplicable Challenges to FCC Authority

Regulatory Reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service is the Unsurprising Result of ISPs Inexplicable Challenges to FCC Authority Regulatory Reclassification of Broadband Internet Access Service is the Unsurprising Result of ISPs Inexplicable Challenges to FCC Authority An Open Internet has long been a bipartisan goal in the United

More information

Computer Internet. Lawyer. The. This two-part series examines the rulings of

Computer Internet. Lawyer. The. This two-part series examines the rulings of The & Computer Internet Lawyer Volume 25 Number 7/8 JULY/AUGUST 2008 Ronald L. Johnston, Arnold & Porter, LLP Editor-in-Chief* VoIP Services Regulation 2008: Tracking the Evolving Regulatory Framework

More information

Good Filing Practices

Good Filing Practices Filing the FCC Form 499 Good Filing Practices March 17, 2015 Webinar Agenda Agenda New For the 2015 FCC Form 499-A Annual True-Up De Minimis Good Filing Practices How to Avoid Common Findings FCC Form

More information

Presented by Scott Thompson, Jay Ireland, Maria Browne, John Seiver, Jill Valenstein, and Jim Tomlinson October 23, 2013

Presented by Scott Thompson, Jay Ireland, Maria Browne, John Seiver, Jill Valenstein, and Jim Tomlinson October 23, 2013 Current Legal Issues Affecting Broadband Infrastructure Deployment Presented by Scott Thompson, Jay Ireland, Maria Browne, John Seiver, Jill Valenstein, and Jim Tomlinson October 23, 2013 Introduction

More information

Before the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin

Before the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin Before the PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN Madison Wisconsin Investigation of Voice over ) Case No. 5-TI-2071 Internet Protocol in Wisconsin ) Public Comments of Communications Workers of America

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of ) The Cable Communications Policy Act ) MB Docket No. 05-311 of 1934 as amended

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Inquiry Concerning High-Speed ) GN Docket No. 00-185 Access to the Internet Over ) Cable and Other Facilities )

More information

How To File the FCC Form 499-A

How To File the FCC Form 499-A How To File the FCC Form 499-A March 2013 Completing the 2013 FCC Form 499-A Who must file the FCC Form 499-A? Instructions pgs. 2-3 ALL intrastate, interstate, and international providers of telecommunications

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, D.C. 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, D.C. 20554 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of THE PROVISION OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE VIA "CABLE INTERNET" UNITED STATES INTERNET INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION ("USIIA"),

More information

DEVELOPMENTS IN VOIP AND BROADBAND REGULATION

DEVELOPMENTS IN VOIP AND BROADBAND REGULATION DEVELOPMENTS IN VOIP AND BROADBAND REGULATION John Nakahata Brita Strandberg Bruce Gottlieb Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis Copyright 2005 All Rights Reserved i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction...1 A.

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20544 Ameren Missouri Petition for Declaratory ) Ruling Pursuant to Section 1.2(a) of ) WC Docket No. 13-307 the Commission's Rules ) OPPOSITION

More information

January 23, 2015. Re: Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28; Framework for Broadband Internet Service, GN Docket No.

January 23, 2015. Re: Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28; Framework for Broadband Internet Service, GN Docket No. VIA ECFS Ms. Marlene Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, GN Docket No. 14-28; Framework for Broadband

More information

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2013

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2013 Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30, 2013 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau June 2014 This report is available for reference in the FCC s Reference Information

More information

FCC Dives Headfirst Into Privacy

FCC Dives Headfirst Into Privacy Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com FCC Dives Headfirst Into Privacy Law360, New York

More information

The Florida Senate. Interim Report 2011-108 October 2010

The Florida Senate. Interim Report 2011-108 October 2010 The Florida Senate Interim Report 2011-108 October 2010 Committee on Communications, Energy, and Public Utilities REVIEW CHAPTER 364, FLORIDA STATUTES, RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES TO IDENTIFY

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20544

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20544 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20544 In the Matter of Petition of Nebraska Public Service Commission and Kansas Corporation Commission for Declaratory Ruling or, in the Alternative,

More information

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report

KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report KANSAS CORPORATION COMMISSION IP-to-IP Interconnection Report 2014 REPORT ON IP- TO- IP INTERCONNECTION A Summary of Status of the FCC s Internet Protocol- to- Internet Protocol Interconnection Proceeding

More information

VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003

VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003 VoIP Overview Wayne Fonteix - AT&T Presented to: NARUC Committee on Telecommunications NARUC Committee on Finance and Technology February 25, 2003 It is easier to stay out than get out. -- Mark Twain Current

More information

STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. NOI-2013-0001 ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE VOICE ON THE NET COALITION

STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. NOI-2013-0001 ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE VOICE ON THE NET COALITION STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE IOWA UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: INQUIRY INTO THE APPROPRIATE SCOPE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATION Docket No. NOI-2013-0001 COMMENTS OF THE VOICE ON THE NET COALITION

More information

NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554

NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 This is an unofficial announcement

More information

Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049

Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049 Michael 3. Wid Director Public Affiin. Policy, and Communications 100 Communications Drive P.O. Box 49 Sun Prairie, WI 535950049 January 13,2009 Phone: 608-837-1732 FAX: 608-837-1 128 E-mail: mike.wirl@verizon.com

More information

State Taxes and Fees Applicable to Voice, Video, and Data Service Providers

State Taxes and Fees Applicable to Voice, Video, and Data Service Providers INFORMATION BRIEF Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 November 1999 Jeanne Cochran, Legislative Analyst, 651-296-8961 Pat Dalton, Legislative

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Ensuring Customer Premises Equipment Backup Power for Continuity of Communications Technology Transitions Policies and

More information

Data-Driven Developments: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2012-2017

Data-Driven Developments: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2012-2017 Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2529826/ Data-Driven Developments: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2012-2017 Description: The 18th edition of this

More information

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RELEASES STUDY ON TELEPHONE TRENDS

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION RELEASES STUDY ON TELEPHONE TRENDS NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 This is an unofficial announcement

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) Petition for Declaratory Ruling that AT&T s ) Phone-to-Phone IP Telephony Services Are ) WC Docket No. 02-361 Exempt

More information

133-C 9, GENERAL

133-C 9, GENERAL General Order 133-C Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Rules Governing Telecommunications Services Effective July 9, 2009 1. GENERAL 1.1 Intent. a. Purpose. The purpose of these rules

More information

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Petition of Union Electric Company ) WC Docket No. 13-307 D/B/A Ameren Missouri for Declaratory ) Ruling Concerning

More information

Note: Admin rules mis-numbered see 8721 also THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF

Note: Admin rules mis-numbered see 8721 also THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF Note: Admin rules mis-numbered see 8721 also THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ADMINISTRATION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF AB, Inc. FOR A DECLARATORY RULING # 8761 Pursuant to RSA 541-A:1,

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) Technology Transitions ) GN Docket No. 13-5 ) Policies and Rules Governing Retirement ) RM-11358 Of Copper Loops by

More information

the Interconnection Agreements filed with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the

the Interconnection Agreements filed with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (the - ' '..:,- ':)CeC \ir i \;- ; L!LED IDAHO pub~i~~:i~~~e OMMISgWi'fEB -6 1"- ~;i'i 9: 58 In the Matter of the Petition for Approval of an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement Between Verizon Northwest

More information

MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MAINE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Report to the Legislature Pursuant to An Act to Reform Telecommunications Regulation, Public Law 2011, Chapter 623, Section D-7, Regarding Assessments Paid By Voice Service

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISISON Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISISON Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISISON Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) SBC IP Communications, Inc. ) CC Docket No. 99-200 Petition for Limited Waiver of ) Section 52.15(g) of the ) Commissions

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In the Matter of: JOINT APPLICATION OF BELL ATLANTIC ) CORPORATION AND GTE CORPORATION ) CASE NO. 99-296 FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING TRANSFER ) OF

More information

The Free State Foundation

The Free State Foundation A Free Market Think Tank For Maryland Because Ideas Matter Testimony of Randolph J. May President before the Senate Finance Committee and the House Economic Matters Committee of the Maryland General Assembly

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Jurisdictional Separations Reform ) and Referral to the Federal-State ) CC Docket No. 80-286 Joint Board ) ) Communications

More information

Voice over Internet (Protocol)

Voice over Internet (Protocol) Voice over Internet (Protocol) Kevin C. Schoen, President schoen.kevin@acd.net This Presentation: What is VOI(P)? Universal Service 911 Inter-Carrier Compensation Who s ACD? Facilities based CLEC. Operates

More information

REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET

REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET REGULATORY FEES FACT SHEET Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 September 11, 2015 WHAT YOU OWE INTERSTATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS (ITSP) FOR FY 2015

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554

PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 PUBLIC NOTICE Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 News Media Information 202 / 418-0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: 1-888-835-5322 DA 15-1330 Released: November

More information

Before the. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 AND. Charles Acquard, Executive Director NASUCA. 8380 Colesville Road, Suite 101

Before the. Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 AND. Charles Acquard, Executive Director NASUCA. 8380 Colesville Road, Suite 101 October 6, 2011 Stefanie A. Brand Director Division of Rate Counsel Deputy Public Advocate Newark, NJ 07101 Phone (973) 648-2690 Christopher J. White www.rpa.state.nj.us njratepayer@rpa.state.nj.us Fax

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: ) ) ) Inflexion Communications ) ) WC Docket No. 04-52 Petition for Declaratory Ruling that ) Inflexion Communications

More information

Applicants are required to file an original and five (5) paper copies.

Applicants are required to file an original and five (5) paper copies. APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF TERRITORIAL AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS State Form 52648 (R5 / 8-11) INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Applicants are required to file an original

More information

Pole Attachments and Rights-of-Way: Rights and Opportunities

Pole Attachments and Rights-of-Way: Rights and Opportunities Pole Attachments and Rights-of-Way: Rights and Opportunities UTC Telecom 2005 May 23, 2005 Long Beach, California Jeffrey L. Sheldon McDermott Will & Emery LLP 600 13th Street NW Washington, DC 20005-3096

More information

Home Model Legislation Telecommunications and Information. Cable and Video Competition Act

Home Model Legislation Telecommunications and Information. Cable and Video Competition Act Search GO LOGIN LOGOUT HOME JOIN ALEC CONTACT ABOUT MEMBERS EVENTS & MEETINGS MODEL LEGISLATION TASK FORCES ALEC INITIATIVES PUBLICATIONS NEWS Model Legislation Civil Justice Commerce, Insurance, and Economic

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Time Warner Cable s Petition for ) WC Docket No. 06-55 Declaratory Ruling that Competitive ) Local Exchange Carriers

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Vermont Telephone Company Petition for Declaratory Ruling Whether Voice Over Internet Protocol Services Are Entitled

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service Request for Review of Decision of Universal

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of AT&T Petition to Launch a Proceeding Concerning the TDM-to-IP Transition GN Docket No. 12-353 Petition of the National

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) AT&T Petition for Declaratory ) WC Docket No. 02-361 Ruling that AT&T s Phone-to-Phone ) IP Telephony Services are

More information

CRS Report for Congress

CRS Report for Congress Order Code RL33034 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Telecommunications Act: Competition, Innovation, and Reform Updated January 13, 2006 Charles B. Goldfarb Specialist in Industrial

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, DC 20006

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Washington, DC 20006 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Joint Petition for Rulemaking to Resolve ) RM-10865 Various Outstanding Issues Concerning the ) Implementation of

More information

CHAPTER 13 TELECOMMUNICATIONS. commercial mobile services means public telecommunications services supplied through mobile wireless means;

CHAPTER 13 TELECOMMUNICATIONS. commercial mobile services means public telecommunications services supplied through mobile wireless means; CHAPTER 13 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Article 13.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: commercial mobile services means public telecommunications services supplied through mobile wireless means; cost-oriented

More information

Testimony of. Mr. Garry Betty. April 23, 2002

Testimony of. Mr. Garry Betty. April 23, 2002 Testimony of Mr. Garry Betty April 23, 2002 Introduction Good afternoon and thank you for inviting me to testify today about the proposed merger between AT&T and Comcast and its potential impact on competition

More information

Overcoming Economic Obstructions: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2011-2016

Overcoming Economic Obstructions: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2011-2016 Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2134414/ Overcoming Economic Obstructions: U.S. Telecom Wired and Wireless Sizing and Share 2011-2016 Description: The 17th edition

More information

June 27, 2014. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

June 27, 2014. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 91200 G STREET, NW, SUITE 350 PH: 202.296.6650 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 FX: 202.296.7585 June 27, 2014 VIA ECFS EX PARTE Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability to All Americans in a Reasonable and Timely

More information

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS COMPTETITIVE CABLE AND VIDEO SERVICE ACT

SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS COMPTETITIVE CABLE AND VIDEO SERVICE ACT SECTION BY SECTION ANALYSIS COMPTETITIVE CABLE AND VIDEO SERVICE ACT Sections 1-3 These introductory sections explain that the new act will amend the existing cable law (Title 7, Chapter 59), name the

More information

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2013

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2013 Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2013 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau October 2014 This report is available for reference in the FCC s Reference

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 REPLY COMMENTS OF SUREWEST COMMUNICATIONS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 REPLY COMMENTS OF SUREWEST COMMUNICATIONS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) MM Docket 07-269 Annual Assessment of the Status of ) Competition in the Market for the ) Delivery of Video Programming

More information

A dynamic assessment of VoIP adoption, innovation and their interaction with CALEA regulation

A dynamic assessment of VoIP adoption, innovation and their interaction with CALEA regulation A dynamic assessment of VoIP adoption, innovation and their interaction with CALEA regulation Chintan Vaishnav chintanv@mit.edu Engineering Systems Division Massachusetts Institute of Technology Charles

More information

Privacy Year in Review: Privacy and VoIP Technology

Privacy Year in Review: Privacy and VoIP Technology Privacy Year in Review: Privacy and VoIP Technology JOHN B. MORRIS, JR. ABSTRACT Voice over internet protocol ( VoIP ) technology is increasingly being used throughout the nation. VoIP technology provides

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet ) ) ) ) GN Docket No. 14-28 COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION

More information

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE DATE: January 7, 2009 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Bryan Conway Celeste Hari Competitive Providers Report to Legislature ORS 759.050(9) requires the

More information

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission s Own Motion to Require Interconnected Voice Over Internet Protocol Service Providers to

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY MEDIA Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Promoting Innovation and Competition in the Provision of Multichannel Video Programming Distribution Services MB Docket

More information

EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY

EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY EDUCATIONAL ADVISORY FORM 499 REVENUE REPORTING PRIMER SERIES Reporting Revenue from Interconnected VoIP Bundles and Corollary/Peripheral Services Sold in Conjunction With I-VoIP Issues, Options, Risks

More information

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE Original Title Page DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE REGULATIONS, RATES, AND CHARGES Applying to the Provision of DSL For Customers of This DSL Service Guide does not include Internet Access,

More information

Federalism Principles ( Draft Principles ) developed by the National Association of Regulatory Utility

Federalism Principles ( Draft Principles ) developed by the National Association of Regulatory Utility Re: NARUC TASK FORCE ON FEDERALISM Introduction XO Communications, LLC ( XO ) 1 appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft Federalism Principles ( Draft Principles ) developed by the National

More information

National Regulatory Research Institute. Fundamentals of Telecommunications Regulation: Markets, Jurisdiction and Challenges

National Regulatory Research Institute. Fundamentals of Telecommunications Regulation: Markets, Jurisdiction and Challenges National Regulatory Research Institute Fundamentals of Telecommunications Regulation: Markets, Jurisdiction and Challenges Peter Bluhm Director, Telecommunications Research and Policy May 7, 2008 08-05

More information

Broadband What is it?

Broadband What is it? What is it? FCC Definition 200 kbps is defined as Internet Access 200 kbps in at least one direction is defined as Hi Speed Access (1) 200 kbps in both directions is defined as Advanced Services (1) A

More information

GENERAL TARIFF CRTC 21461

GENERAL TARIFF CRTC 21461 410 Resale and Sharing 410.1 Service Description GEERAL TARIFF CRTC 21461 Original Page 410-1 TELUS telecommunications services may be shared or resold in accordance with the terms and conditions specified

More information

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C.

BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of Cbeyond, Inc. Petition for Expedited Rulemaking to Require Unbundling of Hybrid, FTTH, and FTTC Loops Pursuant to 47 U.S.C.

More information

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Request for Review by Deltacom, Inc. of ) WC Docket No. 06-122 Universal Service Administrator Decision ) COMMENTS

More information

Telecommunications Issues in NM Economic & Rural Development Legislative Interim Committee September 20, 2012

Telecommunications Issues in NM Economic & Rural Development Legislative Interim Committee September 20, 2012 Telecommunications Issues in NM Economic & Rural Development Legislative Interim Committee September 20, 2012 Leo Baca, State Legislative Affairs Director CenturyLink CenturyLink in New Mexico CenturyLink

More information

2012 499-A Webinar March 2012. www.usac.org

2012 499-A Webinar March 2012. www.usac.org 2012 499-A Webinar March 2012 Topics What is New for 2012 Completing the 2012 FCC Form 499-A 2012 499 A/Q True Up Navigating E-File What is New For 2012 Non-Interconnected VoIP For Purposes of TRS Contribution

More information

TELEPHONE COMPANY PROPERTY TAX

TELEPHONE COMPANY PROPERTY TAX Department of Revenue Division of Research and Policy January 10, 2007 TELEPHONE COMPANY PROPERTY TAX A. INTRODUCTION In general, property taxes are assessed and collected at the local level. However,

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and Operating Data Gathering REPLY COMMENTS Matthew M. Polka

More information

Overview of WAN Connections Module 1

Overview of WAN Connections Module 1 Overview of WAN Connections Module 1 Objectives This module introduces the basic elements of WAN connections and describes the role each element plays in creating that connection. After completing this

More information

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING. Adopted: June 29, 2012 Released: June 29, 2012

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) ) ) ) ) DECLARATORY RULING. Adopted: June 29, 2012 Released: June 29, 2012 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Petition of GCB Communications, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Communications and Lake Country Communications, Inc. for Declaratory

More information

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 COMMENTS OF XO COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, LLC. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Request for Review of PaeTec Communications, Inc. of Universal Service Administrator Decision WC Docket No. 06-122 COMMENTS

More information

Low Income Program. Best Practices

Low Income Program. Best Practices Low Income Program Best Practices 1 Overview One Lifeline account per household Advertising and Outreach FCC Form 497 Certification and Verification Recordkeeping 2 Best Practices One-per Household 3 One

More information

278.516 Alternative regulation process for small telephone utilities -- Findings -- Definitions -- Procedures -- Withdrawal. (1) The legislature

278.516 Alternative regulation process for small telephone utilities -- Findings -- Definitions -- Procedures -- Withdrawal. (1) The legislature 278.516 Alternative regulation process for small telephone utilities -- Findings -- Definitions -- Procedures -- Withdrawal. (1) The legislature finds and determines that: (a) Small telephone utilities

More information